Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (10): 2442-2452.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.10.013
• Horticultural Special Local Products·Agricultural Product Processing Engineering • Previous Articles Next Articles
YAO Qing1(), SHI Junjie2, HOU Xianfei2, JIA Donghai2, GU Yuanguo2, Aribelegan Hazzetti1, MIAO Haocui3(), LI Qiang2()
Received:
2023-02-10
Online:
2023-10-20
Published:
2023-11-01
Correspondence author:
MIAO Haocui (1981-), female, Qingdao, Shandong, researcher, main research direction of peanut cultivation and stress physiology,(E-mail)Supported by:
姚庆1(), 施俊杰2, 侯献飞2, 贾东海2, 顾元国2, 阿里别里根·哈孜太1, 苗昊翠3(), 李强2()
通讯作者:
苗昊翠(1981-),女,山东青岛人,研究员,研究方向为花生栽培与逆境生理,(E-mail)作者简介:
姚庆(1986-),男,新疆伊犁人,助理研究员,研究方向为新品种引进、选育及作物栽培,(E-mail)452760959@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
YAO Qing, SHI Junjie, HOU Xianfei, JIA Donghai, GU Yuanguo, Aribelegan Hazzetti, MIAO Haocui, LI Qiang. Physiological response of 42 creeping peanut cultivars to salt stress at seedling stage[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(10): 2442-2452.
姚庆, 施俊杰, 侯献飞, 贾东海, 顾元国, 阿里别里根·哈孜太, 苗昊翠, 李强. 42份匍匐型花生幼苗对盐胁迫的生理响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2442-2452.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.10.013
编号 Number | 名称 Name | 来源 Origin | 编号 Number | 名称 Name | 来源 Origin | 编号 Number | 名称 Name | 来源 Origin | 编号 Number | 名称 Name | 来源 Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | C095 | 河南 | 12 | C001 | 河南 | 23 | C129 | 河南 | 34 | Z5096 | 河南 |
2 | Z5035 | 河南 | 13 | C014 | 河南 | 24 | C130 | 河南 | 35 | Z5108 | 河南 |
3 | Z5036 | 河南 | 14 | C035 | 河南 | 25 | C135 | 河南 | 36 | Z5110 | 河南 |
4 | Z5040 | 河南 | 15 | C062 | 河南 | 26 | C141 | 河南 | 37 | Z5123 | 河南 |
5 | Z5069 | 河南 | 16 | C087 | 河南 | 27 | C145 | 河南 | 38 | Z5157 | 河南 |
6 | Z5070 | 河南 | 17 | C090 | 河南 | 28 | C145-1 | 河南 | 39 | Z5185 | 河南 |
7 | Z5074 | 河南 | 18 | C094 | 河南 | 29 | C145-2 | 河南 | 40 | Z5225 | 河南 |
8 | Z5076 | 河南 | 19 | C108 | 河南 | 30 | Z5028 | 河南 | 41 | Z5230 | 河南 |
9 | Z5081 | 河南 | 20 | C126 | 河南 | 31 | Z5083 | 河南 | 42 | C108-1 | 河南 |
10 | C092 | 河南 | 21 | C127 | 河南 | 32 | Z5205 | 河南 | |||
11 | Z5162 | 河南 | 22 | C128 | 河南 | 33 | 新花19号 | 新疆 |
Tab.1 Variety number and origin of creeping peanut tested
编号 Number | 名称 Name | 来源 Origin | 编号 Number | 名称 Name | 来源 Origin | 编号 Number | 名称 Name | 来源 Origin | 编号 Number | 名称 Name | 来源 Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | C095 | 河南 | 12 | C001 | 河南 | 23 | C129 | 河南 | 34 | Z5096 | 河南 |
2 | Z5035 | 河南 | 13 | C014 | 河南 | 24 | C130 | 河南 | 35 | Z5108 | 河南 |
3 | Z5036 | 河南 | 14 | C035 | 河南 | 25 | C135 | 河南 | 36 | Z5110 | 河南 |
4 | Z5040 | 河南 | 15 | C062 | 河南 | 26 | C141 | 河南 | 37 | Z5123 | 河南 |
5 | Z5069 | 河南 | 16 | C087 | 河南 | 27 | C145 | 河南 | 38 | Z5157 | 河南 |
6 | Z5070 | 河南 | 17 | C090 | 河南 | 28 | C145-1 | 河南 | 39 | Z5185 | 河南 |
7 | Z5074 | 河南 | 18 | C094 | 河南 | 29 | C145-2 | 河南 | 40 | Z5225 | 河南 |
8 | Z5076 | 河南 | 19 | C108 | 河南 | 30 | Z5028 | 河南 | 41 | Z5230 | 河南 |
9 | Z5081 | 河南 | 20 | C126 | 河南 | 31 | Z5083 | 河南 | 42 | C108-1 | 河南 |
10 | C092 | 河南 | 21 | C127 | 河南 | 32 | Z5205 | 河南 | |||
11 | Z5162 | 河南 | 22 | C128 | 河南 | 33 | 新花19号 | 新疆 |
品种 Varieties | 对照均值± 标准差 Control mean ±SD | 处理均值± 标准差 Mean± SD after stress | 脯氨酸变幅 Range of proline (%) | 品种 Varieties | 对照均值± 标准差 Control mean ±SD | 处理均值± 标准差 Mean± SD after stress | 脯氨酸变幅 Range of proline (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C095 | 44.86±5.70EF | 926.12±8.29A | 1 964.47 | C128 | 46.74±4.3EF | 791.11±60.17BC | 1 592.58 |
Z5035 | 65.31±16.57CD | 934.41±0.00A | 1 330.73 | C129 | 72.17±3.68CD | 936.97±0.00A | 1 198.28 |
Z5036 | 53.72±9.59EF | 934.41±0.00A | 1 639.41 | C130 | 66.54±4.10CD | 99.05±4.86J | 48.86 |
Z5040 | 55.18±3.74EF | 103.55±15.84J | 87.66 | C135 | 69.41±7.04CD | 265.10±20.74GH | 281.93 |
Z5069 | 48.02±3.79EF | 202.66±17.06HI | 322.03 | C141 | 53.24±4.23EF | 634.22±28.44D | 1 091.25 |
Z5070 | 70.84±4.82CD | 934.41±0.00A | 1 219.04 | C145 | 53.99±4.01EF | 839.28±14.28AB | 1 454.51 |
Z5074 | 77.45±17.61BC | 934.41±0.00A | 1 106.47 | C145-1 | 75.72±13.5CD | 376.29±13.01F | 396.95 |
Z5076 | 38.99±3.79F | 332.79±12.41FG | 753.53 | C145-2 | 65.47±1.94CD | 364.20±28.30F | 456.29 |
Z5081 | 151.67±32.89A | 934.41±0.00A | 516.08 | Z5028 | 68.21±3.39CD | 936.97±0.00A | 1273.65 |
C092 | 52.40±6.20EF | 934.41±0.00A | 1 683.23 | Z5083 | 75.42±1.14CD | 766.80±78.85BC | 916.71 |
Z5162 | 78.16±7.15BC | 919.4±15.02A | 1 076.31 | Z5205 | 76.15±6.73CD | 936.97±0.00A | 1 130.43 |
C001 | 60.10±5.62EF | 227.7±2.75HI | 278.87 | 新花19号 | 59.42±3.23EF | 936.97±0.00A | 1 476.86 |
C014 | 81.99±15.23BC | 934.41±0.00A | 1 039.66 | Z5096 | 68.91±6.44CD | 936.97±0.00A | 1 259.70 |
C035 | 84.91±17.91BC | 934.41±0.00A | 1 000.47 | Z5108 | 64.79±0.79CD | 936.97±0.00A | 1 346.16 |
C062 | 87.20±16.97BC | 934.41±0.00A | 971.57 | Z5110 | 67.56±3.77CD | 499.03±21.97E | 638.65 |
C087 | 62.25±0.86DE | 876.18±45.63AB | 1 307.52 | Z5123 | 83.56±7.82BC | 343.16±39.71FG | 310.67 |
C090 | 90.94±15.09BC | 206.13±2.3HI | 126.67 | Z5157 | 57.22±3.66EF | 936.97±0.00A | 1 537.49 |
C094 | 123.41±22.11AB | 936.97±0.00A | 659.23 | Z5185 | 63.51±6.22CD | 157.20±11.23IJ | 147.52 |
C108 | 110.35±13.86AB | 936.97±0.00A | 749.09 | Z5225 | 79.94±8.66BC | 363.17±44.01F | 354.30 |
C126 | 62.05±8.15DE | 936.97±0.00A | 1 410.02 | Z5230 | 66.30±1.74CD | 357.10±29.45F | 438.61 |
C127 | 52.57±2.18EF | 936.97±0.00A | 1 682.33 | C108-1 | 111.57±19.02AB | 936.97±0.00A | 739.80 |
Tab.2 Effect of NaCl stress on proline of prostrate peanut seedlings leaves
品种 Varieties | 对照均值± 标准差 Control mean ±SD | 处理均值± 标准差 Mean± SD after stress | 脯氨酸变幅 Range of proline (%) | 品种 Varieties | 对照均值± 标准差 Control mean ±SD | 处理均值± 标准差 Mean± SD after stress | 脯氨酸变幅 Range of proline (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C095 | 44.86±5.70EF | 926.12±8.29A | 1 964.47 | C128 | 46.74±4.3EF | 791.11±60.17BC | 1 592.58 |
Z5035 | 65.31±16.57CD | 934.41±0.00A | 1 330.73 | C129 | 72.17±3.68CD | 936.97±0.00A | 1 198.28 |
Z5036 | 53.72±9.59EF | 934.41±0.00A | 1 639.41 | C130 | 66.54±4.10CD | 99.05±4.86J | 48.86 |
Z5040 | 55.18±3.74EF | 103.55±15.84J | 87.66 | C135 | 69.41±7.04CD | 265.10±20.74GH | 281.93 |
Z5069 | 48.02±3.79EF | 202.66±17.06HI | 322.03 | C141 | 53.24±4.23EF | 634.22±28.44D | 1 091.25 |
Z5070 | 70.84±4.82CD | 934.41±0.00A | 1 219.04 | C145 | 53.99±4.01EF | 839.28±14.28AB | 1 454.51 |
Z5074 | 77.45±17.61BC | 934.41±0.00A | 1 106.47 | C145-1 | 75.72±13.5CD | 376.29±13.01F | 396.95 |
Z5076 | 38.99±3.79F | 332.79±12.41FG | 753.53 | C145-2 | 65.47±1.94CD | 364.20±28.30F | 456.29 |
Z5081 | 151.67±32.89A | 934.41±0.00A | 516.08 | Z5028 | 68.21±3.39CD | 936.97±0.00A | 1273.65 |
C092 | 52.40±6.20EF | 934.41±0.00A | 1 683.23 | Z5083 | 75.42±1.14CD | 766.80±78.85BC | 916.71 |
Z5162 | 78.16±7.15BC | 919.4±15.02A | 1 076.31 | Z5205 | 76.15±6.73CD | 936.97±0.00A | 1 130.43 |
C001 | 60.10±5.62EF | 227.7±2.75HI | 278.87 | 新花19号 | 59.42±3.23EF | 936.97±0.00A | 1 476.86 |
C014 | 81.99±15.23BC | 934.41±0.00A | 1 039.66 | Z5096 | 68.91±6.44CD | 936.97±0.00A | 1 259.70 |
C035 | 84.91±17.91BC | 934.41±0.00A | 1 000.47 | Z5108 | 64.79±0.79CD | 936.97±0.00A | 1 346.16 |
C062 | 87.20±16.97BC | 934.41±0.00A | 971.57 | Z5110 | 67.56±3.77CD | 499.03±21.97E | 638.65 |
C087 | 62.25±0.86DE | 876.18±45.63AB | 1 307.52 | Z5123 | 83.56±7.82BC | 343.16±39.71FG | 310.67 |
C090 | 90.94±15.09BC | 206.13±2.3HI | 126.67 | Z5157 | 57.22±3.66EF | 936.97±0.00A | 1 537.49 |
C094 | 123.41±22.11AB | 936.97±0.00A | 659.23 | Z5185 | 63.51±6.22CD | 157.20±11.23IJ | 147.52 |
C108 | 110.35±13.86AB | 936.97±0.00A | 749.09 | Z5225 | 79.94±8.66BC | 363.17±44.01F | 354.30 |
C126 | 62.05±8.15DE | 936.97±0.00A | 1 410.02 | Z5230 | 66.30±1.74CD | 357.10±29.45F | 438.61 |
C127 | 52.57±2.18EF | 936.97±0.00A | 1 682.33 | C108-1 | 111.57±19.02AB | 936.97±0.00A | 739.80 |
品种 Varieties | 对照均值± 标准差 Control mean ±SD | 处理均值± 标准差 Mean± SD after stress | 丙二醛变幅 Range of Malondialdeh (%) | 品种 Varieties | 对照均值± 标准差 Control mean ±SD | 处理均值± 标准差 Mean± SD after stress | 丙二醛变幅 Range of Malondialdeh (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C095 | 1.68±0.33MN | 11.68±0.33MN | 56.55 | C128 | 1.32±0.79MN | 221.32±0.79MN | 1 400.76 |
Z5035 | 4.18±0.35IJ | 24.18±0.35IJ | 144.74 | C129 | 7.16±1.40EF | 237.16±1.4EF | -45.39 |
Z5036 | 7.10±0.60EF | 37.10±0.60EF | -43.94 | C130 | 9.57±0.98CD | 249.57±0.98CD | -66.25 |
Z5040 | 4.72±1.59HI | 44.72±1.59HI | -17.16 | C135 | 5.78±0.61FG | 255.78±0.61FG | -45.67 |
Z5069 | 7.87±0.55EF | 57.87±0.55EF | -47.78 | C141 | 1.34±0.69MN | 261.34±0.69MN | 223.13 |
Z5070 | 3.36±0.58IJ | 63.36±0.58IJ | -48.51 | C145 | 0.25±0.10O | 270.25±0.10O | 2 016.00 |
Z5074 | 3.09±0.44JK | 73.09±0.44JK | -40.13 | C145-1 | 3.58±1.11IJ | 283.58±1.11IJ | -8.66 |
Z5076 | 10.10±0.79CD | 810.10±0.79CD | -7.23 | C145-2 | 2.84±1.12KL | 292.84±1.12KL | 20.07 |
Z5081 | 8.08±0.88DE | 98.08±0.88DE | 90.84 | Z5028 | 11.50±0.53CD | 3011.50±0.53CD | -36.96 |
C092 | 5.11±1.75GH | 105.11±1.75GH | -17.22 | Z5083 | 12.93±2.45BC | 3112.93±2.45BC | -40.53 |
Z5162 | 6.90±1.14EF | 116.90±1.14EF | -81.30 | Z5205 | 5.29±1.22FG | 325.29±1.22FG | -92.63 |
C001 | 12.63±2.47BC | 1212.63±2.47BC | -88.04 | 新花19号 | 2.86±0.26KL | 332.86±0.26KL | -10.84 |
C014 | 27.81±1.80A | 1327.81±1.80A | -51.38 | Z5096 | 9.65±0.79CD | 349.65±0.79CD | 34.20 |
C035 | 7.37±0.77EF | 147.37±0.77EF | -60.65 | Z5108 | 6.23±0.39FG | 356.23±0.39FG | 582.34 |
C062 | 6.86±1.18EF | 156.86±1.18EF | -47.23 | Z5110 | 24.23±2.29A | 3624.23±2.29A | -90.55 |
C087 | 5.86±0.97FG | 165.86±0.97FG | -35.84 | Z5123 | 8.05±0.48DE | 378.05±0.48DE | 426.83 |
C090 | 4.46±0.72IJ | 174.46±0.72IJ | -83.18 | Z5157 | 6.19±1.32FG | 386.19±1.32FG | 283.36 |
C094 | 1.12±0.50NO | 181.12±0.50NO | 483.93 | Z5185 | 3.37±0.35IJ | 393.37±0.35IJ | 104.45 |
C108 | 2.21±0.50LM | 192.21±0.50LM | 114.03 | Z5225 | 16.87±0.79B | 4016.87±0.79B | -83.05 |
C126 | 6.15±1.17FG | 206.15±1.17FG | -50.41 | Z5230 | 2.41±0.60KL | 412.41±0.60KL | 321.99 |
C127 | 5.72±1.31FG | 215.72±1.31FG | -61.19 | C108-1 | 2.84±0.72KL | 422.84±0.72KL | 471.48 |
Tab.3 Effects of salt stress on malondialdehyde in the leaves of creeping peanut seedlings
品种 Varieties | 对照均值± 标准差 Control mean ±SD | 处理均值± 标准差 Mean± SD after stress | 丙二醛变幅 Range of Malondialdeh (%) | 品种 Varieties | 对照均值± 标准差 Control mean ±SD | 处理均值± 标准差 Mean± SD after stress | 丙二醛变幅 Range of Malondialdeh (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C095 | 1.68±0.33MN | 11.68±0.33MN | 56.55 | C128 | 1.32±0.79MN | 221.32±0.79MN | 1 400.76 |
Z5035 | 4.18±0.35IJ | 24.18±0.35IJ | 144.74 | C129 | 7.16±1.40EF | 237.16±1.4EF | -45.39 |
Z5036 | 7.10±0.60EF | 37.10±0.60EF | -43.94 | C130 | 9.57±0.98CD | 249.57±0.98CD | -66.25 |
Z5040 | 4.72±1.59HI | 44.72±1.59HI | -17.16 | C135 | 5.78±0.61FG | 255.78±0.61FG | -45.67 |
Z5069 | 7.87±0.55EF | 57.87±0.55EF | -47.78 | C141 | 1.34±0.69MN | 261.34±0.69MN | 223.13 |
Z5070 | 3.36±0.58IJ | 63.36±0.58IJ | -48.51 | C145 | 0.25±0.10O | 270.25±0.10O | 2 016.00 |
Z5074 | 3.09±0.44JK | 73.09±0.44JK | -40.13 | C145-1 | 3.58±1.11IJ | 283.58±1.11IJ | -8.66 |
Z5076 | 10.10±0.79CD | 810.10±0.79CD | -7.23 | C145-2 | 2.84±1.12KL | 292.84±1.12KL | 20.07 |
Z5081 | 8.08±0.88DE | 98.08±0.88DE | 90.84 | Z5028 | 11.50±0.53CD | 3011.50±0.53CD | -36.96 |
C092 | 5.11±1.75GH | 105.11±1.75GH | -17.22 | Z5083 | 12.93±2.45BC | 3112.93±2.45BC | -40.53 |
Z5162 | 6.90±1.14EF | 116.90±1.14EF | -81.30 | Z5205 | 5.29±1.22FG | 325.29±1.22FG | -92.63 |
C001 | 12.63±2.47BC | 1212.63±2.47BC | -88.04 | 新花19号 | 2.86±0.26KL | 332.86±0.26KL | -10.84 |
C014 | 27.81±1.80A | 1327.81±1.80A | -51.38 | Z5096 | 9.65±0.79CD | 349.65±0.79CD | 34.20 |
C035 | 7.37±0.77EF | 147.37±0.77EF | -60.65 | Z5108 | 6.23±0.39FG | 356.23±0.39FG | 582.34 |
C062 | 6.86±1.18EF | 156.86±1.18EF | -47.23 | Z5110 | 24.23±2.29A | 3624.23±2.29A | -90.55 |
C087 | 5.86±0.97FG | 165.86±0.97FG | -35.84 | Z5123 | 8.05±0.48DE | 378.05±0.48DE | 426.83 |
C090 | 4.46±0.72IJ | 174.46±0.72IJ | -83.18 | Z5157 | 6.19±1.32FG | 386.19±1.32FG | 283.36 |
C094 | 1.12±0.50NO | 181.12±0.50NO | 483.93 | Z5185 | 3.37±0.35IJ | 393.37±0.35IJ | 104.45 |
C108 | 2.21±0.50LM | 192.21±0.50LM | 114.03 | Z5225 | 16.87±0.79B | 4016.87±0.79B | -83.05 |
C126 | 6.15±1.17FG | 206.15±1.17FG | -50.41 | Z5230 | 2.41±0.60KL | 412.41±0.60KL | 321.99 |
C127 | 5.72±1.31FG | 215.72±1.31FG | -61.19 | C108-1 | 2.84±0.72KL | 422.84±0.72KL | 471.48 |
品种 Varieties | 对照均值± 标准差 Control mean ±SD | 处理均值± 标准差 Mean± SD after stress | 叶绿素变幅 Range of chlorophy (%) | 品种 Varieties | 对照均值± 标准差 Control mean ±SD | 处理均值± 标准差 Mean± SD after stress | 叶绿素变幅 Range of chlorophy (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C095 | 2.02±0.08AB | 1.97±0.14BC | -2.48 | C128 | 1.78±0.12AB | 1.36±0.03FG | -23.60 |
Z5035 | 1.64±0.08BC | 1.85±0.13CD | 12.80 | C129 | 2.35±0.21AB | 2.32±0.16BC | -1.28 |
Z5036 | 2.16±0.04AB | 1.85±0.16CD | -14.35 | C130 | 1.51±0.34BC | 2.06±0.2BC | 36.42 |
Z5040 | 1.86±0.09AB | 1.80±0.36CD | -3.23 | C135 | 1.52±0.26BC | 1.81±0.08CD | 19.08 |
Z5069 | 1.82±0.30AB | 2.02±0.32BC | 10.99 | C141 | 2.00±0.18AB | 2.13±0.17BC | 6.50 |
Z5070 | 2.21±0.21AB | 2.38±0.48BC | 7.69 | C145 | 1.47±0.19CD | 1.51±0.21DE | 2.72 |
Z5074 | 1.93±0.25AB | 2.36±0.15BC | 22.28 | C145-1 | 1.15±0.11F | 2.32±0.21BC | 101.74 |
Z5076 | 2.14±0.17AB | 2.21±0.09BC | 3.27 | C145-2 | 1.55±0.16BC | 1.85±0.06CD | 19.35 |
Z5081 | 1.64±0.25BC | 2.30±0.31BC | 40.24 | Z5028 | 1.52±0.13BC | 1.81±0.05CD | 19.08 |
C092 | 1.83±0.10AB | 2.35±0.10BC | 28.42 | Z5083 | 1.63±0.15BC | 1.44±0.14EF | -11.66 |
Z5162 | 1.80±0.31AB | 2.49±0.20BC | 38.33 | Z5205 | 1.83±0.07AB | 1.91±0.1BC | 4.37 |
C001 | 1.80±0.20AB | 2.36±0.20BC | 31.11 | 新花19号 | 1.85±0.09AB | 4.85±0.19A | 162.16 |
C014 | 1.88±0.05AB | 1.98±0.11BC | 5.32 | Z5096 | 1.79±0.06AB | 4.37±0.46A | 144.13 |
C035 | 2.61±0.02A | 2.26±0.1BC | -13.41 | Z5108 | 1.21±0.2EF | 2.10±0.20BC | 73.55 |
C062 | 2.00±0.07AB | 2.42±0.18BC | 21.00 | Z5110 | 1.31±0.05DE | 2.00±0.20BC | 52.67 |
C087 | 2.35±0.31AB | 2.00±0.06BC | -14.89 | Z5123 | 1.47±0.07CD | 2.52±0.12BC | 71.43 |
C090 | 1.48±0.20CD | 2.55±0.14BC | 72.30 | Z5157 | 1.43±0.12CD | 2.10±0.10BC | 46.85 |
C094 | 1.56±0.04BC | 2.81±0.17B | 80.13 | Z5185 | 1.32±0.16DE | 1.99±0.12BC | 50.76 |
C108 | 1.75±0.19BC | 2.36±0.19BC | 34.86 | Z5225 | 1.72±0.34BC | 1.08±0.28G | -37.21 |
C126 | 1.76±0.09BC | 2.19±0.09BC | 24.43 | Z5230 | 1.37±0.27CD | 2.16±0.18BC | 57.66 |
C127 | 1.58±0.33BC | 2.17±0.12BC | 37.34 | C108-1 | 1.16±0.13F | 2.42±0.19BC | 108.62 |
Tab.4 Effect of salt stress on totl chlorophyll in leaf of creeping peanut seedlings
品种 Varieties | 对照均值± 标准差 Control mean ±SD | 处理均值± 标准差 Mean± SD after stress | 叶绿素变幅 Range of chlorophy (%) | 品种 Varieties | 对照均值± 标准差 Control mean ±SD | 处理均值± 标准差 Mean± SD after stress | 叶绿素变幅 Range of chlorophy (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C095 | 2.02±0.08AB | 1.97±0.14BC | -2.48 | C128 | 1.78±0.12AB | 1.36±0.03FG | -23.60 |
Z5035 | 1.64±0.08BC | 1.85±0.13CD | 12.80 | C129 | 2.35±0.21AB | 2.32±0.16BC | -1.28 |
Z5036 | 2.16±0.04AB | 1.85±0.16CD | -14.35 | C130 | 1.51±0.34BC | 2.06±0.2BC | 36.42 |
Z5040 | 1.86±0.09AB | 1.80±0.36CD | -3.23 | C135 | 1.52±0.26BC | 1.81±0.08CD | 19.08 |
Z5069 | 1.82±0.30AB | 2.02±0.32BC | 10.99 | C141 | 2.00±0.18AB | 2.13±0.17BC | 6.50 |
Z5070 | 2.21±0.21AB | 2.38±0.48BC | 7.69 | C145 | 1.47±0.19CD | 1.51±0.21DE | 2.72 |
Z5074 | 1.93±0.25AB | 2.36±0.15BC | 22.28 | C145-1 | 1.15±0.11F | 2.32±0.21BC | 101.74 |
Z5076 | 2.14±0.17AB | 2.21±0.09BC | 3.27 | C145-2 | 1.55±0.16BC | 1.85±0.06CD | 19.35 |
Z5081 | 1.64±0.25BC | 2.30±0.31BC | 40.24 | Z5028 | 1.52±0.13BC | 1.81±0.05CD | 19.08 |
C092 | 1.83±0.10AB | 2.35±0.10BC | 28.42 | Z5083 | 1.63±0.15BC | 1.44±0.14EF | -11.66 |
Z5162 | 1.80±0.31AB | 2.49±0.20BC | 38.33 | Z5205 | 1.83±0.07AB | 1.91±0.1BC | 4.37 |
C001 | 1.80±0.20AB | 2.36±0.20BC | 31.11 | 新花19号 | 1.85±0.09AB | 4.85±0.19A | 162.16 |
C014 | 1.88±0.05AB | 1.98±0.11BC | 5.32 | Z5096 | 1.79±0.06AB | 4.37±0.46A | 144.13 |
C035 | 2.61±0.02A | 2.26±0.1BC | -13.41 | Z5108 | 1.21±0.2EF | 2.10±0.20BC | 73.55 |
C062 | 2.00±0.07AB | 2.42±0.18BC | 21.00 | Z5110 | 1.31±0.05DE | 2.00±0.20BC | 52.67 |
C087 | 2.35±0.31AB | 2.00±0.06BC | -14.89 | Z5123 | 1.47±0.07CD | 2.52±0.12BC | 71.43 |
C090 | 1.48±0.20CD | 2.55±0.14BC | 72.30 | Z5157 | 1.43±0.12CD | 2.10±0.10BC | 46.85 |
C094 | 1.56±0.04BC | 2.81±0.17B | 80.13 | Z5185 | 1.32±0.16DE | 1.99±0.12BC | 50.76 |
C108 | 1.75±0.19BC | 2.36±0.19BC | 34.86 | Z5225 | 1.72±0.34BC | 1.08±0.28G | -37.21 |
C126 | 1.76±0.09BC | 2.19±0.09BC | 24.43 | Z5230 | 1.37±0.27CD | 2.16±0.18BC | 57.66 |
C127 | 1.58±0.33BC | 2.17±0.12BC | 37.34 | C108-1 | 1.16±0.13F | 2.42±0.19BC | 108.62 |
品种 Varieties | 对照均值± 标准差 Control mean ±SD | 处理均值± 标准差 Mean± SD after stress | 可溶性 糖变幅 Range ofsoluble sugar(%) | 品种 Varieties | 对照均值± 标准差 Control mean ±SD | 处理均值± 标准差 Mean± SD after stress | 可溶性 糖变幅 Range ofsoluble sugar(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C095 | 3.28±0.96AB | 4.09±0.21AB | 24.70 | C128 | 3.33±0.94AB | 2.94±0.56AB | -11.71 |
Z5035 | 4.04±1.25A | 2.98±0.14AB | -26.24 | C129 | 1.63±0.08B | 3.36±0.15AB | 106.13 |
Z5036 | 1.69±0.13B | 3.22±0.16AB | 90.53 | C130 | 2.50±0.41AB | 2.65±0.21CD | 6.00 |
Z5040 | 1.65±0.44B | 3.07±0.13AB | 86.06 | C135 | 3.48±0.37AB | 3.44±0.36AB | -1.15 |
Z5069 | 3.09±0.39AB | 3.58±0.45AB | 15.86 | C141 | 3.07±0.19AB | 2.80±0.08BC | -8.79 |
Z5070 | 2.25±0.16AB | 3.84±0.45AB | 70.67 | C145 | 2.99±0.37AB | 2.59±0.18CD | -13.38 |
Z5074 | 2.05±0.32AB | 3.44±0.38AB | 67.80 | C145-1 | 3.00±0.10AB | 2.27±0.15DE | -24.33 |
Z5076 | 1.97±0.49AB | 3.27±0.26AB | 65.99 | C145-2 | 3.04±0.28AB | 2.55±0.26CD | -16.12 |
Z5081 | 2.53±0.31AB | 2.67±0.13CD | 5.53 | Z5028 | 3.05±0.17AB | 2.56±0.06CD | -16.07 |
C092 | 2.48±0.23AB | 3.12±0.26AB | 25.81 | Z5083 | 2.43±0.07AB | 2.50±0.08CD | 2.88 |
Z5162 | 2.14±0.09AB | 2.82±0.32BC | 31.78 | Z5205 | 2.42±0.01AB | 2.89±0.22AB | 19.42 |
C001 | 2.43±0.58AB | 2.37±0.24DE | -2.47 | 新花19号 | 2.28±0.34AB | 3.59±0.22AB | 57.46 |
C014 | 2.81±0.26AB | 3.19±0.34AB | 13.52 | Z5096 | 1.82±0.20AB | 4.49±0.62A | 146.70 |
C035 | 3.01±0.41AB | 4.11±0.23AB | 36.54 | Z5108 | 2.48±0.47AB | 4.35±0.37AB | 75.40 |
C062 | 2.86±0.77AB | 3.22±0.06AB | 12.59 | Z5110 | 2.35±0.53AB | 3.05±0.44AB | 29.79 |
C087 | 3.43±1.05AB | 3.06±0.60AB | -10.79 | Z5123 | 2.84±0.21AB | 2.60±0.18CD | -8.45 |
C090 | 2.72±0.23AB | 3.79±0.48AB | 39.34 | Z5157 | 2.88±0.13AB | 2.33±0.03DE | -19.10 |
C094 | 2.69±0.38AB | 2.78±0.67BC | 3.35 | Z5185 | 2.77±0.18AB | 2.87±0.99AB | 3.61 |
C108 | 2.64±1.10AB | 3.04±0.62AB | 15.15 | Z5225 | 2.64±0.02AB | 2.09±0.17E | -20.83 |
C126 | 1.81±0.91AB | 3.40±0.59AB | 87.85 | Z5230 | 2.20±0.12AB | 2.37±0.09DE | 7.73 |
C127 | 1.88±0.60AB | 2.25±0.14DE | 19.68 | C108-1 | 2.08±0.09AB | 3.26±0.04AB | 56.73 |
Tab.5 Effect of salt stress on soluble sugar in the leaves of creeping peanut seedlings
品种 Varieties | 对照均值± 标准差 Control mean ±SD | 处理均值± 标准差 Mean± SD after stress | 可溶性 糖变幅 Range ofsoluble sugar(%) | 品种 Varieties | 对照均值± 标准差 Control mean ±SD | 处理均值± 标准差 Mean± SD after stress | 可溶性 糖变幅 Range ofsoluble sugar(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C095 | 3.28±0.96AB | 4.09±0.21AB | 24.70 | C128 | 3.33±0.94AB | 2.94±0.56AB | -11.71 |
Z5035 | 4.04±1.25A | 2.98±0.14AB | -26.24 | C129 | 1.63±0.08B | 3.36±0.15AB | 106.13 |
Z5036 | 1.69±0.13B | 3.22±0.16AB | 90.53 | C130 | 2.50±0.41AB | 2.65±0.21CD | 6.00 |
Z5040 | 1.65±0.44B | 3.07±0.13AB | 86.06 | C135 | 3.48±0.37AB | 3.44±0.36AB | -1.15 |
Z5069 | 3.09±0.39AB | 3.58±0.45AB | 15.86 | C141 | 3.07±0.19AB | 2.80±0.08BC | -8.79 |
Z5070 | 2.25±0.16AB | 3.84±0.45AB | 70.67 | C145 | 2.99±0.37AB | 2.59±0.18CD | -13.38 |
Z5074 | 2.05±0.32AB | 3.44±0.38AB | 67.80 | C145-1 | 3.00±0.10AB | 2.27±0.15DE | -24.33 |
Z5076 | 1.97±0.49AB | 3.27±0.26AB | 65.99 | C145-2 | 3.04±0.28AB | 2.55±0.26CD | -16.12 |
Z5081 | 2.53±0.31AB | 2.67±0.13CD | 5.53 | Z5028 | 3.05±0.17AB | 2.56±0.06CD | -16.07 |
C092 | 2.48±0.23AB | 3.12±0.26AB | 25.81 | Z5083 | 2.43±0.07AB | 2.50±0.08CD | 2.88 |
Z5162 | 2.14±0.09AB | 2.82±0.32BC | 31.78 | Z5205 | 2.42±0.01AB | 2.89±0.22AB | 19.42 |
C001 | 2.43±0.58AB | 2.37±0.24DE | -2.47 | 新花19号 | 2.28±0.34AB | 3.59±0.22AB | 57.46 |
C014 | 2.81±0.26AB | 3.19±0.34AB | 13.52 | Z5096 | 1.82±0.20AB | 4.49±0.62A | 146.70 |
C035 | 3.01±0.41AB | 4.11±0.23AB | 36.54 | Z5108 | 2.48±0.47AB | 4.35±0.37AB | 75.40 |
C062 | 2.86±0.77AB | 3.22±0.06AB | 12.59 | Z5110 | 2.35±0.53AB | 3.05±0.44AB | 29.79 |
C087 | 3.43±1.05AB | 3.06±0.60AB | -10.79 | Z5123 | 2.84±0.21AB | 2.60±0.18CD | -8.45 |
C090 | 2.72±0.23AB | 3.79±0.48AB | 39.34 | Z5157 | 2.88±0.13AB | 2.33±0.03DE | -19.10 |
C094 | 2.69±0.38AB | 2.78±0.67BC | 3.35 | Z5185 | 2.77±0.18AB | 2.87±0.99AB | 3.61 |
C108 | 2.64±1.10AB | 3.04±0.62AB | 15.15 | Z5225 | 2.64±0.02AB | 2.09±0.17E | -20.83 |
C126 | 1.81±0.91AB | 3.40±0.59AB | 87.85 | Z5230 | 2.20±0.12AB | 2.37±0.09DE | 7.73 |
C127 | 1.88±0.60AB | 2.25±0.14DE | 19.68 | C108-1 | 2.08±0.09AB | 3.26±0.04AB | 56.73 |
品种 Varieties | 综合评价指标Comprehensive evaluation indexes | 平均隶属 函数值 Average membership function value | 抗盐性 排序 Rank of salt tolerance | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
可溶性糖 Soluble sugar content | 丙二醛 MDA | 脯氨酸 Proline content | 叶绿素a Chlorophyll a | 叶绿素b Chlorophyll b | 叶绿素总含量 The total Chlorophyll | |||
C095 | 0.83 | 0.95 | 0.99 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.58 | 10 |
Z5035 | 0.37 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.19 | 0.27 | 0.20 | 0.47 | 23 |
Z5036 | 0.47 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.17 | 0.32 | 0.20 | 0.51 | 16 |
Z5040 | 0.41 | 0.92 | 0.01 | 0.17 | 0.29 | 0.19 | 0.33 | 38 |
Z5069 | 0.62 | 0.91 | 0.12 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.25 | 0.41 | 29 |
Z5070 | 0.73 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.32 | 0.45 | 0.35 | 0.64 | 3 |
Z5074 | 0.56 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.32 | 0.40 | 0.34 | 0.60 | 6 |
Z5076 | 0.49 | 0.79 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.41 | 28 |
Z5081 | 0.24 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.32 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.48 | 20 |
C092 | 0.43 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 0.56 | 13 |
Z5162 | 0.30 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.36 | 0.44 | 0.37 | 0.57 | 11 |
C001 | 0.12 | 0.97 | 0.15 | 0.33 | 0.37 | 0.34 | 0.38 | 33 |
C014 | 0.46 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.48 | 22 |
C035 | 0.84 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.29 | 0.39 | 0.31 | 0.63 | 4 |
C062 | 0.47 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.33 | 0.46 | 0.36 | 0.59 | 7 |
C087 | 0.40 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.22 | 0.33 | 0.25 | 0.51 | 17 |
C090 | 0.71 | 0.99 | 0.13 | 0.35 | 0.53 | 0.39 | 0.52 | 15 |
C094 | 0.29 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.40 | 0.68 | 0.46 | 0.61 | 5 |
C108 | 0.40 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.30 | 0.47 | 0.34 | 0.57 | 12 |
C126 | 0.55 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.26 | 0.44 | 0.30 | 0.58 | 9 |
C127 | 0.07 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.26 | 0.40 | 0.29 | 0.50 | 19 |
C128 | 0.35 | 0.54 | 0.83 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.32 | 40 |
C129 | 0.53 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.30 | 0.42 | 0.33 | 0.58 | 8 |
C130 | 0.23 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.33 | 39 |
C135 | 0.56 | 0.93 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.25 | 0.19 | 0.39 | 32 |
C141 | 0.30 | 0.91 | 0.64 | 0.25 | 0.40 | 0.28 | 0.46 | 24 |
C145 | 0.21 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.09 | 0.22 | 0.11 | 0.40 | 31 |
C145-1 | 0.08 | 0.93 | 0.33 | 0.27 | 0.55 | 0.33 | 0.42 | 27 |
C145-2 | 0.19 | 0.93 | 0.32 | 0.17 | 0.35 | 0.21 | 0.36 | 35 |
Z5028 | 0.20 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.16 | 0.31 | 0.19 | 0.45 | 26 |
Z5083 | 0.17 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.34 | 37 |
Z5205 | 0.33 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.50 | 18 |
新花19号 | 0.63 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 1 |
Z5096 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.78 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 2 |
Z5108 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.23 | 0.43 | 0.27 | 0.48 | 20 |
Z5110 | 0.40 | 0.95 | 0.48 | 0.18 | 0.48 | 0.24 | 0.46 | 25 |
Z5123 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.52 | 0.38 | 0.29 | 41 |
Z5157 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.34 | 0.27 | 0.40 | 30 |
Z5185 | 0.32 | 0.85 | 0.07 | 0.20 | 0.40 | 0.24 | 0.35 | 36 |
Z5225 | 0.00 | 0.94 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.21 | 42 |
Z5230 | 0.12 | 0.77 | 0.31 | 0.24 | 0.46 | 0.29 | 0.37 | 34 |
C108-1 | 0.49 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.33 | 0.44 | 0.35 | 0.54 | 14 |
Tab.6 Comprehensive evaluation of salt resistance of 42 creeping peanut varieties under NaCl stress
品种 Varieties | 综合评价指标Comprehensive evaluation indexes | 平均隶属 函数值 Average membership function value | 抗盐性 排序 Rank of salt tolerance | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
可溶性糖 Soluble sugar content | 丙二醛 MDA | 脯氨酸 Proline content | 叶绿素a Chlorophyll a | 叶绿素b Chlorophyll b | 叶绿素总含量 The total Chlorophyll | |||
C095 | 0.83 | 0.95 | 0.99 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.58 | 10 |
Z5035 | 0.37 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.19 | 0.27 | 0.20 | 0.47 | 23 |
Z5036 | 0.47 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.17 | 0.32 | 0.20 | 0.51 | 16 |
Z5040 | 0.41 | 0.92 | 0.01 | 0.17 | 0.29 | 0.19 | 0.33 | 38 |
Z5069 | 0.62 | 0.91 | 0.12 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.25 | 0.41 | 29 |
Z5070 | 0.73 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.32 | 0.45 | 0.35 | 0.64 | 3 |
Z5074 | 0.56 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.32 | 0.40 | 0.34 | 0.60 | 6 |
Z5076 | 0.49 | 0.79 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.41 | 28 |
Z5081 | 0.24 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.32 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.48 | 20 |
C092 | 0.43 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 0.56 | 13 |
Z5162 | 0.30 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.36 | 0.44 | 0.37 | 0.57 | 11 |
C001 | 0.12 | 0.97 | 0.15 | 0.33 | 0.37 | 0.34 | 0.38 | 33 |
C014 | 0.46 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.48 | 22 |
C035 | 0.84 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.29 | 0.39 | 0.31 | 0.63 | 4 |
C062 | 0.47 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.33 | 0.46 | 0.36 | 0.59 | 7 |
C087 | 0.40 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.22 | 0.33 | 0.25 | 0.51 | 17 |
C090 | 0.71 | 0.99 | 0.13 | 0.35 | 0.53 | 0.39 | 0.52 | 15 |
C094 | 0.29 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.40 | 0.68 | 0.46 | 0.61 | 5 |
C108 | 0.40 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.30 | 0.47 | 0.34 | 0.57 | 12 |
C126 | 0.55 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.26 | 0.44 | 0.30 | 0.58 | 9 |
C127 | 0.07 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.26 | 0.40 | 0.29 | 0.50 | 19 |
C128 | 0.35 | 0.54 | 0.83 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.32 | 40 |
C129 | 0.53 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.30 | 0.42 | 0.33 | 0.58 | 8 |
C130 | 0.23 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.33 | 39 |
C135 | 0.56 | 0.93 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.25 | 0.19 | 0.39 | 32 |
C141 | 0.30 | 0.91 | 0.64 | 0.25 | 0.40 | 0.28 | 0.46 | 24 |
C145 | 0.21 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.09 | 0.22 | 0.11 | 0.40 | 31 |
C145-1 | 0.08 | 0.93 | 0.33 | 0.27 | 0.55 | 0.33 | 0.42 | 27 |
C145-2 | 0.19 | 0.93 | 0.32 | 0.17 | 0.35 | 0.21 | 0.36 | 35 |
Z5028 | 0.20 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.16 | 0.31 | 0.19 | 0.45 | 26 |
Z5083 | 0.17 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.34 | 37 |
Z5205 | 0.33 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.50 | 18 |
新花19号 | 0.63 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 1 |
Z5096 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.78 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 2 |
Z5108 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.23 | 0.43 | 0.27 | 0.48 | 20 |
Z5110 | 0.40 | 0.95 | 0.48 | 0.18 | 0.48 | 0.24 | 0.46 | 25 |
Z5123 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.52 | 0.38 | 0.29 | 41 |
Z5157 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.34 | 0.27 | 0.40 | 30 |
Z5185 | 0.32 | 0.85 | 0.07 | 0.20 | 0.40 | 0.24 | 0.35 | 36 |
Z5225 | 0.00 | 0.94 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.21 | 42 |
Z5230 | 0.12 | 0.77 | 0.31 | 0.24 | 0.46 | 0.29 | 0.37 | 34 |
C108-1 | 0.49 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.33 | 0.44 | 0.35 | 0.54 | 14 |
[1] | 王艳丽, 杨帆, 李睿瑞, 等. 不同种类盐胁迫对绿豆种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报, 2018, 30(5):20-26. |
WANG Liyan, YANG Fan, LI Ruirui, et al. Effect of Different Salt Stress on Germination and Seedling Growth of Mung Bean Seed[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, 2018, 30(5):20-26. | |
[2] |
Wang W, Vinocur B, Altman A. Plant responses to drought,salinity and extreme temperatures:towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance[J]. Planta Berlin, 2003, 218(1):1-14.
DOI URL |
[3] | 贾敬敦, 张富. 依靠科技创新推动我国盐碱地资源可持续利用[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2014, 16(5):1-7. |
JIA Jingdun, ZHANG Fu. Sustainable Utilization of Saline-alkali Land Resources through Scientific and Technological Innovation in China[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2014, 16(5):1-7. | |
[4] | 姚立生. 植物耐盐性多学科的研究进展[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2016. |
YAO Lisheng. Advances in multi-disciplinary studies on salt tolerance of plants[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2016. | |
[5] | 张炜曼. 浅析中国西北地区土壤盐碱化现状及修复对策[J]. 当代化工研究, 2018,(2):26-27. |
ZHANG Weiman. Analysis on the Present Situation and Restoration Countermeasures of Soil Salinization in Northwest Region of China[J]. Modern Chemical Research, 2018,(2):26-27. | |
[6] |
孙东雷, 卞能飞, 陈志德, 等. 花生萌发期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2017, 18(6):1079-1087.
DOI |
SUN Donslei, BIAN Nengfei, CHEN Zhide, et al. Comprehensive Evaluation of Salt Tolerance and Screening for Salt Tolerant Accessions of Peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) at Germination Stage[J]. Journal of Plant GeneticResources, 2017, 18(6):1079-1087. | |
[7] | 吴兰荣, 陈静, 许婷婷, 等. 花生全生育期耐盐鉴定研究[J]. 花生学报, 2005, 34(1):20-24. |
WU Lanrong, CHEN Jing, XU Tingting, et al. Identification of Salt Tolerance in Peanut Growth Duration[J]. Journal o f Peanut Science, 2005, 34(1):20-24. | |
[8] | 李远航, 贺康宁, 张潭, 等. 盐胁迫对黑果枸杞光合生理指标的影响[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2019, 17(1):82-88. |
LI Yuanhang, HE Kangning, ZHANG Tan, et al. Effects of salt stress on the photosynthetic and physiological indexes of Lycium ruthenicum[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 17(1):82-88. | |
[9] | 慈敦伟, 张智猛, 丁红, 等. 花生耐盐性评价方法的比较与应用[J]. 花生学报, 2013, 42(2):28-35. |
CI Dunwei, ZHANG Zhimeng, DING Hong, et al. Comparison and Application of Different Evaluation Methods on Peanut Salt Tolerance[J]. Journal of Peanut Science, 2013, 42(2):28-35. | |
[10] | 胡晓辉, 孙令强, 苗华荣, 等. 不同盐浓度对花生品种耐盐性鉴定指标的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2011,(11):35-37. |
HU Xiaohui, SUN Linqiang, MIAO Huarong, et al. Effects of Different Na Cl Concentrations on Indicators for Evaluating Salt Tolerance of Peanut Varieties[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2011,(11):35-37. | |
[11] | 陈杨, 吕玉英, 杨会, 等. 水培法鉴定花生苗期耐盐性研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 2019, 51(9)125-131. |
CHEN Yang, LYU Yuying, YANG Hui, et al. Study on Salt Tolerance Identification of Peanut at Seedling Stage by Hydroponics[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 51(9)125-131. | |
[12] |
Y Wang Y, Liang C, Meng Z, et al. Leveraging Atriplex hortensis Choline Monooxygenase to Improve Chilling Tolerance in Cotton[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2019, 162:364-373.
DOI URL |
[13] |
Buysse J A N, Merckx R. An improved colorimetric method to quantify sugar content of plant tissue[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1993, 44(10):1627-1629.
DOI URL |
[14] |
Masayasu M, Hiroshi Y. A simplified assay method of superoxide dismutase activity for clinical use[J]. Clinica Chimica Acta, 1979, 92(3):337-342.
DOI PMID |
[15] | Zhu F Y, Chen M X, Chan W L, et al. SWATH-MS quantitative proteomic investigation of nitrogen starvation in Arabidopsis reveals new aspects of plant nitrogen stress responses[J]. Journal of Proteomics, 2018:S1874391918302938-. |
[16] | 杨淑慎, 高俊凤. 活性氧、自由基与植物的衰老[J]. 西北植物学报, 2001,(2):215-220. |
YANG Shushen, GAO Junfeng. Influence of active oxygen and free radicals on plant senescence[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2001,(2):215-220. | |
[17] |
Lu K X, Cao B H, Feng X P, et al. Photosyntheic response of salt-tolerant and sensitive soybean varieties[J]. Photosynthetica, 2009, 47(3):381-387.
DOI URL |
[18] | 刘华, 舒孝喜, 赵银, 等. 盐胁迫对碱茅生长及碳水化合物含量的影响[J]. 草业科学, 1997, 14(1):18-20. |
LIU Hua, SHU Xiaoxi, ZHAO Yin, et al. Effect of salt stress on growth and carbohydrate contents in puccinellia tenuiflora[J]. Pratacultural Science, 1997, 14(1):18-20. | |
[19] | 张改过. 黑麦草耐盐性的研究[J]. 山西农林科技, 2009, 38(2):19-21. |
ZHANG Gaiguo. Study on Antrsalinity of Lolium perenne[J]. Shanxi Forestry Science and Technology, 2009, 38(2):19-21. | |
[20] | 张春兰, 曹帅, 满丽莉, 等. 不同基因型大豆耐盐性筛选与综合鉴定[J]. 内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 34(4):342-249. |
ZHANG Chunlan, CAO Shuai, MAN Lili, et al. Screening and Comprehensive Identification of Salt Tolerance of Soybean Genotypes[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities, 2019, 34(4):342-249. | |
[21] | 陈学森, 李宪利, 张艳敏, 等. 杏种质资源评价及遗传育种研究进展[J]. 果树学报, 2001,(3):178-181. |
CHEN Xuesen, LI Xianli, ZHANG Yanmin, et al. Advances in Apricot Germplasm Resources Evaluation and Genetic Breeding[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2001,(3):178-181. | |
[22] | 李瀚, 杨吉顺, 张冠初, 等. 花生品种萌发期耐盐性比较鉴定[J]. 花生学报, 2015, 44(4):48-52. |
LI Han, YANG Jishun, ZHANG Guanchu, et al. Identification of Salt Tolerance in Germination Period of Peanut Varieties[J]. Journal of Peanut Science, 2015, 44(4):48-52. | |
[23] |
石运庆, 苗华荣, 胡晓辉, 等. 花生耐盐碱性鉴定指标的研究及应用[J]. 核农学报, 2015, 29(3):442-447.
DOI |
SHI Yunqing, MIAO Huarong, HU Xiaohui, et al. Research and Application of Saline-alkaline Tolerance Indexes of Peanut[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 29(3):442-447.
DOI |
|
[24] | 杨圆圆. 花生种质苗期耐盐性鉴定评价[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2016. |
YANG Yuanyuan. Identification of Salt Tolerance at Seedling Stage in Peanut Germplasm[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2016. | |
[25] | 高荣嵘, 杨莎, 郭峰, 等. 干旱—盐胁迫对花生幼苗渗透调节物质含量的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2017, 49(8):26-29. |
GAO Rongrong, YANG Sha, GUO Feng, et al. Effects of Intercross Stress of Drought and Salt on Contents of Osmotic Adjustment Substances in Peanut Seedlings[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 49(8):26-29. | |
[26] | 赵英, 何璐洁, 邓平, 等. NaCl胁迫下罗汉果幼苗生长和生理特性的变化[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48,(15):199-203. |
ZHAO Ying, HE Lujie, DENG Ping, et al. Changes in growth and physiological characteristics of Momordica grosvenorius seedlings under NaCl stress[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48,(15):199-203. | |
[27] | 温赛群, 丁红, 徐扬, 等. 不同耐盐性花生品种对NaCl胁迫的光合和抗逆生理响应特征[J]. 西北植物学报, 2021, 41(9):1535-1544. |
WEN Saiqun, DING Hong, XU Yang, et al. Physiological Response with Different Salt Characteristics of Resistance under Peanut Varieties NaCI Stress[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2021, 41(9):1535-1544. | |
[28] | 徐晨, 凌风楼, 徐克章, 等. 盐胁迫对不同水稻品种光合特性和生理生化特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(3):280-286. |
XU Chen, LING Fenglou, XU Kezhang, et al. Effect of Salt Stress on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Physiological and Biochemical Traits of Different Rice Varieties[J]. Chinese Rice Science, 2013, 27(3):280-286. |
[1] | Wang Tianling, Hou Xianfei, Shi Junjie, Sun Quanxi, Jia Donghai, Gu Yuanguo, Shan Shihua, Miao Haocui, Li Qiang. Genetic diversity analysis of 67 creeping peanut germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(1): 42-54. |
[2] | WEI Yingfeng, ZHANG Quancheng, ZHA Hui, WANG Xiaoli, WANG Jungang. Effect of pendimethalin on the main growth and development and physiological indicators of Solanum nigrum L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 2013-2021. |
[3] | XIAO Jing, LIU Ning, XU Minghai, ZHANG Jinbo, MA Yanming, WANG Li, XU Lin. Effect of NaCl stress on seed germination of Panicum miliaceum L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1623-1629. |
[4] | WANG Guanyu, JIA Pingping, JIN Juan, Abudoukayoumu Ayimaiti, FAN Dingyu, ZHAO Xiaomei, HAO Qing, YANG Lei, GENG Wenjuan. Effects of high temperature stress on physiological characteristics on jujube flower organs [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1485-1491. |
[5] | CHEN Yan, HUANG Luyao, DENG Changrong, ZHANG Yanjun, HOU Quangang, SHAO Dengkui. Analysis on related physiological indexes of pepper with hair characteristic under chilling stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1492-1498. |
[6] | CHEN Liliang, LU Qianjun, MA Yuanyuan, LIU Ying, ZHAO Baolong, SUN Junli. Effects of NaCl stress on antioxidant enzyme content and malondialdehyde content in grape cultivars leaves [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 880-888. |
[7] | ZHU Pusheng, LIU Huiying, CAO Ze, LIU Kaige, LI Xuezhen. Effects of Exogenous GSNO on Growth and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Tomato Seedlings under NaCl Stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 351-358. |
[8] | MA Yuanyuan, LI Gang, HE Wang, ZHAO Baolong, LU Qianjun, CHEN Liliang, LIU Ying. Alleviating effect of exogenous melatonin on strawberry seedling under NaCl stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(10): 2486-2495. |
[9] | XIAO Zhonglin, YAN Huizhuan, GAO Jie, WANG Siyi, ZHANG Xuxu, Ailixire Nijiati. Effects of Different Concentrations of NaCl and NaHCO3 Stress on Diurnal Changes of Photosynthetic Characteristics of Dried Pepper [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(1): 140-149. |
[10] | YAN Miao, XIONG Tao, HUANG Quansheng, WU Ting, WU Haibo, ZHAO Zhun, HU Guozhi. Effect of Exogenous Salicylic Acid(SA)on the Leaf Anatomical Structure of Hami Melon under NaCl Stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2123-2129. |
[11] | CHEN Liliang, SUN Junli, CHANG Xinyi, YE Jiafa. Effects of Exogenous ALA on Chlorophyll Synthesis in Jujube Seedlings under NaCl Stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(7): 1659-1665. |
[12] | HE Chenchen, LIU Lijun, LU Xiaoyan. Selection of miRNAs and Target Genes in Leaves of Malus sieversii under NaCl Stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(4): 589-598. |
[13] | MAO Jiancai, XIONG Mu, ZHAI Wenqiang, YI Hongping, HUANG Yuan, ZHANG Xuejun. Comprehensive Evaluation of Physiological Indexes of Nine Melon Varieties under NaCl Stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(8): 1421-1430. |
[14] | CHANG Xin-yi, SUN Jun-li, ZAO Bao-long, LI Fang-fang, LIU Lian-ling, HE Wang. Effects of Exogenous ALA on Photosynthesis and Membrane Peroxidation in the Leaves of Jujube Seedlings under NaCl Treatment [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(9): 1635-1644. |
[15] | WANG Zhen-Dong, LU Xiao-Yan, TU Wen-Wen, HE Chen-Chen. Transcriptome Sequencing Analysis of Leaf and Root of Sour Jujube Seedlings under NaCl Stress Alleviated by Exogenous CaCl2 [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(6): 1052-1062. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||