Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (12): 2888-2898.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.12.004
• Crop Genetics and Breeding · Cultivation Physiology · Germplasm Resources • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Humei1(), TIAN Yu1, SHI Feng1, LI Junhong1, HAN Huanyong2, WANG Fangyong2, LUO Honghai1()
Received:
2022-01-10
Online:
2022-12-20
Published:
2023-01-30
Correspondence author:
LUO Honghai
Supported by:
张虎梅1(), 田雨1, 石峰1, 李军宏1, 韩焕勇2, 王方永2, 罗宏海1()
通讯作者:
罗宏海
作者简介:
张虎梅(1998-),女,甘肃武威人,硕士研究生,研究方向为作物高产生理与节水栽培,(E-mail)1026386718@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
ZHANG Humei, TIAN Yu, SHI Feng, LI Junhong, HAN Huanyong, WANG Fangyong, LUO Honghai. Response of Canopy Characteristics of Different Cotton Varieties with Drought Tolerance to Drip Irrigation Amount in Machine-picked Model[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(12): 2888-2898.
张虎梅, 田雨, 石峰, 李军宏, 韩焕勇, 王方永, 罗宏海. 机采模式下耐旱性不同棉花品种冠层特性对滴水量的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(12): 2888-2898.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.12.004
水肥供应 Irrigation and fertilizer supply | 6月16日 | 6月24日 | 7月4日 | 7月14日 | 7月25日 | 8月4日 | 8月13日 | 8月23日 | 总量 Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
磷酸二氢钾 | 29 | 29 | 42 | 42 | 42 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 230 | |
氮(kg/hm2) | 36 | 36 | 72 | 72 | 72 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 360 | |
灌水量 (m3/hm2) | W1 | 375 | 315 | 315 | 405 | 405 | 405 | 405 | 375 | 3 000 |
W2 | 480 | 420 | 420 | 525 | 525 | 525 | 525 | 480 | 3 900 | |
W3 | 600 | 510 | 510 | 645 | 645 | 645 | 645 | 600 | 4 800 |
Table 1 Fertilizer application and irrigation during the cotton growth period
水肥供应 Irrigation and fertilizer supply | 6月16日 | 6月24日 | 7月4日 | 7月14日 | 7月25日 | 8月4日 | 8月13日 | 8月23日 | 总量 Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
磷酸二氢钾 | 29 | 29 | 42 | 42 | 42 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 230 | |
氮(kg/hm2) | 36 | 36 | 72 | 72 | 72 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 360 | |
灌水量 (m3/hm2) | W1 | 375 | 315 | 315 | 405 | 405 | 405 | 405 | 375 | 3 000 |
W2 | 480 | 420 | 420 | 525 | 525 | 525 | 525 | 480 | 3 900 | |
W3 | 600 | 510 | 510 | 645 | 645 | 645 | 645 | 600 | 4 800 |
Fig.1 The changes of chlorophyll content of cotton under different treatments FS:Full squaring stage;Full;IF:Initialflowering stage;PF:Peak flowering stage;FB:Full boll stage;LFB: Later full boll stage;BO:Boll opening stage.The same below
处理 Treatment | 叶面积指数(LAI) | 冠层开度(冠层开度) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PF | FB | LFB | BO | PF | FB | LFB | BO | |
W1 | 2.63b | 2.85c | 2.79c | 2.75c | 0.06a | 0.05a | 0.10a | 0.11a |
W2 | 5.42a | 5.67b | 5.18b | 4.11b | 0.02b | 0.01b | 0.05b | 0.08b |
W3 | 5.62a | 6.23a | 5.98a | 5.01a | 0.02b | 0.02b | 0.04b | 0.05c |
新陆早17号 Xinluzao 17 | 4.24b | 4.71b | 4.39b | 3.89a | 0.04a | 0.03a | 0.06b | 0.09a |
新陆早22号 Xinluzao 22 | 4.87a | 5.13a | 4.91a | 4.02a | 0.03b | 0.03a | 0.07a | 0.07b |
W1-新陆早17号 W1-Xinluzao 17 | 2.58c | 2.72d | 2.60e | 2.58c | 0.07a | 0.05a | 0.10a | 0.12a |
W2-新陆早17号 W2-Xinluzao 17 | 5.00b | 5.29c | 4.76c | 4.04b | 0.03c | 0.01b | 0.04cd | 0.08bc |
W3-新陆早17号 W3-Xinluzao 17 | 5.12b | 6.12ab | 5.81b | 5.06a | 0.02c | 0.01b | 0.03d | 0.06d |
W1-新陆早22号 W1-Xinluzao 22 | 2.67c | 2.98d | 2.97d | 2.93c | 0.05b | 0.04a | 0.10a | 0.10b |
W2-新陆早22号 W2-Xinluzao 22 | 5.84ab | 6.06b | 5.60b | 4.19b | 0.02c | 0.02b | 0.06b | 0.07cd |
W3-新陆早22号 W3-Xinluzao 22 | 6.11a | 6.34a | 6.15a | 4.95a | 0.02c | 0.02b | 0.05bc | 0.04e |
W | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
P | 0.013 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ns | 0.03 | ns | 0.028 | 0.001 |
W×P | ns | 0.011 | ns | ns | ns | ns | 0.047 | ns |
Table 2 Cotton canopy structure changes dynamically under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 叶面积指数(LAI) | 冠层开度(冠层开度) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PF | FB | LFB | BO | PF | FB | LFB | BO | |
W1 | 2.63b | 2.85c | 2.79c | 2.75c | 0.06a | 0.05a | 0.10a | 0.11a |
W2 | 5.42a | 5.67b | 5.18b | 4.11b | 0.02b | 0.01b | 0.05b | 0.08b |
W3 | 5.62a | 6.23a | 5.98a | 5.01a | 0.02b | 0.02b | 0.04b | 0.05c |
新陆早17号 Xinluzao 17 | 4.24b | 4.71b | 4.39b | 3.89a | 0.04a | 0.03a | 0.06b | 0.09a |
新陆早22号 Xinluzao 22 | 4.87a | 5.13a | 4.91a | 4.02a | 0.03b | 0.03a | 0.07a | 0.07b |
W1-新陆早17号 W1-Xinluzao 17 | 2.58c | 2.72d | 2.60e | 2.58c | 0.07a | 0.05a | 0.10a | 0.12a |
W2-新陆早17号 W2-Xinluzao 17 | 5.00b | 5.29c | 4.76c | 4.04b | 0.03c | 0.01b | 0.04cd | 0.08bc |
W3-新陆早17号 W3-Xinluzao 17 | 5.12b | 6.12ab | 5.81b | 5.06a | 0.02c | 0.01b | 0.03d | 0.06d |
W1-新陆早22号 W1-Xinluzao 22 | 2.67c | 2.98d | 2.97d | 2.93c | 0.05b | 0.04a | 0.10a | 0.10b |
W2-新陆早22号 W2-Xinluzao 22 | 5.84ab | 6.06b | 5.60b | 4.19b | 0.02c | 0.02b | 0.06b | 0.07cd |
W3-新陆早22号 W3-Xinluzao 22 | 6.11a | 6.34a | 6.15a | 4.95a | 0.02c | 0.02b | 0.05bc | 0.04e |
W | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
P | 0.013 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ns | 0.03 | ns | 0.028 | 0.001 |
W×P | ns | 0.011 | ns | ns | ns | ns | 0.047 | ns |
生育时期 | Chl | LPAR | MPAR | UPAR | LAI | 冠层开度 | CAP | CR | Yield | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
盛花期 FF | Chl | 1.000 | 0.592 | 0.717 | 0.739 | -0.915* | 0.774 | -0.589 | -0.390 | -0.717 |
LPAR | 1.000 | 0.618 | 0.409 | -0.819* | 0.848* | -0.824* | -0.766 | -0.783 | ||
MPAR | 1.000 | 0.749 | -0.765 | 0.819* | -0.431 | -0.289 | -0.670 | |||
UPAR | 1.000 | -0.659 | 0.437 | -0.047 | 0.157 | -0.234 | ||||
LAI | 1.000 | -0.890* | 0.751 | 0.604 | 0.8226* | |||||
冠层开度 | 1.000 | -0.870* | -0.772 | -0.968** | ||||||
CAP | 1.000 | 0.973* | 0.942** | |||||||
CR | 1.000 | 0.871* | ||||||||
盛铃期 FB | Chl | 1.000 | -0.479 | -0.281 | -0.208 | 0.415 | -0.416 | 0.972** | 0.870* | 0.828* |
LPAR | 1.000 | 0.947** | 0.912* | -0.884* | 0.979** | -0.633 | -0.706 | -0.832* | ||
MPAR | 1.000 | 0.987** | -0.830* | 0.938** | -0.426 | -0.539 | -0.719 | |||
UPAR | 1.000 | -0.797 | 0.914* | -0.346 | -0.487 | -0.655 | ||||
LAI | 1.000 | -0.954** | 0.599 | 0.782 | 0.836* | |||||
冠层开度 | 1.000 | -0.590 | -0.726 | -0.826* | ||||||
CAP | 1.000 | 0.941** | 0.912* | |||||||
CR | 1.000 | 0.958** | ||||||||
盛铃后期 FBL | Chl | 1.000 | -0.872* | -0.642 | -0.834* | 0.545 | -0.754 | 0.616 | 0.854* | 0.899* |
LPAR | 1.000 | 0.905* | 0.985** | -0.633 | 0.925** | -0.159 | -0.632 | -0.774 | ||
MPAR | 1.000 | 0.940** | -0.456 | 0.901* | 0.121 | -0.417 | -0.613 | |||
UPAR | 1.000 | -0.660 | 0.968** | -0.109 | -0.651 | -0.805 | ||||
LAI | 1.000 | -0.761 | 0.008 | 0.615 | 0.676 | |||||
冠层开度 | 1.000 | -0.041 | -0.686 | -0.823* | ||||||
CAP | 1.000 | 0.708 | 0.571 | |||||||
CR | 1.000 | 0.966** | ||||||||
吐絮期 BO | Chl | 1.000 | -0.101 | -0.129 | 0.142 | 0.560 | -0.252 | 0.231 | 0.371 | 0.485 |
LPAR | 1.000 | 0.990** | 0.760 | 0.583 | 0.784 | -0.103 | -0.550 | -0.749 | ||
MPAR | 1.000 | 0.777 | 0.620 | 0.808 | -0.185 | -0.580 | -0.751 | |||
UPAR | 1.000 | 0.559 | 0.291 | 0.152 | -0.059 | -0.218 | ||||
LAI | 1.000 | 0.576 | -0.390 | -0.423 | -0.320 | |||||
冠层开度 | 1.000 | -0.604 | -0.910* | -0.940** | ||||||
CAP | 1.000 | 0.825* | 0.555 | |||||||
CR | 1.000 | 0.923** | ||||||||
Yield | 1.000 |
Table 3 Correlation between canopy structure parameters and seed cotton yield
生育时期 | Chl | LPAR | MPAR | UPAR | LAI | 冠层开度 | CAP | CR | Yield | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
盛花期 FF | Chl | 1.000 | 0.592 | 0.717 | 0.739 | -0.915* | 0.774 | -0.589 | -0.390 | -0.717 |
LPAR | 1.000 | 0.618 | 0.409 | -0.819* | 0.848* | -0.824* | -0.766 | -0.783 | ||
MPAR | 1.000 | 0.749 | -0.765 | 0.819* | -0.431 | -0.289 | -0.670 | |||
UPAR | 1.000 | -0.659 | 0.437 | -0.047 | 0.157 | -0.234 | ||||
LAI | 1.000 | -0.890* | 0.751 | 0.604 | 0.8226* | |||||
冠层开度 | 1.000 | -0.870* | -0.772 | -0.968** | ||||||
CAP | 1.000 | 0.973* | 0.942** | |||||||
CR | 1.000 | 0.871* | ||||||||
盛铃期 FB | Chl | 1.000 | -0.479 | -0.281 | -0.208 | 0.415 | -0.416 | 0.972** | 0.870* | 0.828* |
LPAR | 1.000 | 0.947** | 0.912* | -0.884* | 0.979** | -0.633 | -0.706 | -0.832* | ||
MPAR | 1.000 | 0.987** | -0.830* | 0.938** | -0.426 | -0.539 | -0.719 | |||
UPAR | 1.000 | -0.797 | 0.914* | -0.346 | -0.487 | -0.655 | ||||
LAI | 1.000 | -0.954** | 0.599 | 0.782 | 0.836* | |||||
冠层开度 | 1.000 | -0.590 | -0.726 | -0.826* | ||||||
CAP | 1.000 | 0.941** | 0.912* | |||||||
CR | 1.000 | 0.958** | ||||||||
盛铃后期 FBL | Chl | 1.000 | -0.872* | -0.642 | -0.834* | 0.545 | -0.754 | 0.616 | 0.854* | 0.899* |
LPAR | 1.000 | 0.905* | 0.985** | -0.633 | 0.925** | -0.159 | -0.632 | -0.774 | ||
MPAR | 1.000 | 0.940** | -0.456 | 0.901* | 0.121 | -0.417 | -0.613 | |||
UPAR | 1.000 | -0.660 | 0.968** | -0.109 | -0.651 | -0.805 | ||||
LAI | 1.000 | -0.761 | 0.008 | 0.615 | 0.676 | |||||
冠层开度 | 1.000 | -0.041 | -0.686 | -0.823* | ||||||
CAP | 1.000 | 0.708 | 0.571 | |||||||
CR | 1.000 | 0.966** | ||||||||
吐絮期 BO | Chl | 1.000 | -0.101 | -0.129 | 0.142 | 0.560 | -0.252 | 0.231 | 0.371 | 0.485 |
LPAR | 1.000 | 0.990** | 0.760 | 0.583 | 0.784 | -0.103 | -0.550 | -0.749 | ||
MPAR | 1.000 | 0.777 | 0.620 | 0.808 | -0.185 | -0.580 | -0.751 | |||
UPAR | 1.000 | 0.559 | 0.291 | 0.152 | -0.059 | -0.218 | ||||
LAI | 1.000 | 0.576 | -0.390 | -0.423 | -0.320 | |||||
冠层开度 | 1.000 | -0.604 | -0.910* | -0.940** | ||||||
CAP | 1.000 | 0.825* | 0.555 | |||||||
CR | 1.000 | 0.923** | ||||||||
Yield | 1.000 |
[1] | 魏鑫. 种植模式对机采棉花产量形成及采收效果的影响[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2017. |
WEI Xin. Effect of row planting pattern on machine-harvested cotton yield formation and harvest quality[D]. Urumuqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2017. | |
[2] | 张娜. 新疆农业高效节水灌溉发展现状及"十三五"发展探讨[J]. 中国水利, 2018,(13):36-38, 45. |
ZHANG Na. High-efficient water-saving irrigation development and 13th five-year plan in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region[J]. China Water Resources, 2018,(13):36-38, 45. | |
[3] | 宁松瑞, 左强, 石建初, 等. 新疆典型膜下滴灌棉花种植模式的用水效率与效益[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(22):90-99. |
NING Songrui, ZUO Qiang, SHI Jianchu, et al. Water use efficiency and benefit for typical planting modes of drip-irrigated cotton under film in Xinjiang[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2013, 29(22): 90-99. | |
[4] | 黄程琪. 新疆农业水资源利用效率及影响因素分析[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2019. |
HUANG Chengqi. Analysis on Utilization Efficiency and Influencing Factors of Agricultural Water Resources in Xinjiang[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2019. | |
[5] | 谭代军, 熊康宁, 张俞, 等. 喀斯特石漠化地区枇杷冠层结构特征[J]. 南方农业学报, 2018, 49(9):1753-1759. |
TAN Daijun, XIONG Kangning, ZHANG Yu, et al. Canopy structure characteristics of loquat in Karst rocky desertification area[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2018, 49(9):1753-1759. | |
[6] | 谭娟, 郭晋川, 吴建强, 等. 不同灌溉方式下甘蔗光合特性[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(11):150-158. |
TAN Juan, GUO Jinchuan, WU Jianqiang, et al. Photosynthetic characteristics of sugarcane under different irrigation modes[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2016, 32(11): 150-158. | |
[7] | 杜刚锋. 灌溉方式和灌水量对棉花冠层结构指标及群体光合生产力的影响[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2019. |
DU Gangfen. Effects of irrigation methods and irrigation amount on canopy structure and canopy photosynthetic oroduction in cotton[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2019. | |
[8] | 徐守振, 杨延龙, 陈民志, 等. 北疆棉区滴水量对化学打顶棉花冠层结构及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2017, 54(6):988-997. |
XU Shouzheng, YANG Yanlong, CHEN Mingzhi, et al. Effect of drip irrigation amount on canopy structure and yield of chemical topping cotton in northern Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 54(6):988-997. | |
[9] | 马富裕, 李蒙春, 杨建荣, 等. 花铃期不同时段水分亏缺对棉花群体光合速率及水分利用效率影响的研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2002,(12):1467-1472. |
MA Fuyu, LI Mengchun, YANG Jianrong, et al. A study of effect of water deficit of three period during cotton anthesis on canopy apparent photosynthesis and WUE[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2002,(12):1467-1472. | |
[10] | Drewry D T, Kumar P, Long S, et al. Ecohydrological responses of dense canopies to environmental variability: 1.Interplay between vertical structure and photosynthetic pathway[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences, 2010a, 115(G4):985-989 |
[11] | 牛玉萍, 陈宗奎, 陈厚川, 等. 不同滴灌模式下种植密度对棉花冠层结构特性的调节[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2016, 53(10):1765-1777. |
NIU Yunping, CHEN Zongkai, CHEN Houchuan, et al. Effect of planting density on canopy Structure characteristics of cotton under different drip irrigation patterns[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 53(10):1765-1777. | |
[12] |
高宏云, 李军宏, 王远远, 等. 2个不同耐旱性棉花品种光合特性和干物质累积对干旱的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(2):233-244.
DOI |
GAO Hongyun, LI Junhong, WANG Yuanyuan, et al. Response of photosynthetic characteristics and dry matter accumulation to drought of two cotton varieties with different drought resistance[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(2):233-244.
DOI |
|
[13] |
田雨, 王旭文, 韩焕勇, 等. 施氮量对等行距密植棉花气体交换和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(11):1987-1997.
DOI |
TIAN Yu, WANG Xuwen, HAN Huanyong, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rates on gas exchange and chlorophyll Fluorescence parameters of cotton under wide-row spacing with High Density[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(11):1987-1997.
DOI |
|
[14] | 王聪. 棉花机采模式下行距变化对植株生长发育和产量形成的影响[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2015. |
WANG Chong. A research of Machine-picked cotton growth and yield formation under different row space[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2015. | |
[15] | 田雨, 陈献丘, 夏军, 等. 滴水量对等行距密植机采棉产量和脱叶吐絮的影响[J]. 石河子大学学报, 2020, 38(4):471-478. |
TIAN Yu, CHEN Xianqiu, XIA Jun, et al. Effects of drip irrigation amount on yield,defoliation and boll opening inmachine-harvested cotton under wide-row spacing with high density[J]. Journal of Shihezi University, 2020, 38(4):471-478. | |
[16] | Lichtenthaler H K. Chlorophylls and carotenoids pigments of photosynthetic bio-membranes[J]. Methods Enzymology, 1987,(148):350-382. |
[17] | Malone S, Herbert Jr D A, Holshouser D L. Evaluation of the LAI-2000 plant canopy analyzer to estimate leaf area in manually defoliated soybean[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2002, (94): 1012-1019. |
[18] | 高亮之, 李林. 水稻气象生态. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1992. |
GAO Liangzhi, LI Ling. Meteorological ecology of rice[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press,1992. | |
[19] | 马富裕, 张旺锋, 李锦辉, 等. 棉花群体光合作用测定方法探讨[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 1998,(S1):46-50. |
MA Fuyu, ZHANG Wangfen, LI Jinhong, et al. Dicussion on the determination method of photosynthesis in cotton population[J]. Journal of Shihezi University (Natural Science Ed.), 1998,(S1):46-50. | |
[20] | Dagdelen N, Bas A H, et al. Different drip irrigation regimes affect cotton yield,water use efficiency and fiber quality in western Turkey[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2009,(96):111-120 |
[21] | 成国鹏, 孙红春, 张永江, 等. 群体冠层结构对棉花光合特性及产量性状的影响效应研究[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2015, 38(4):1-7. |
CHEN Guopeng, SUN Hongchun, ZHANG Yongjian, et al. Effects of canopy structure on photosynthesis and yield in cotton[J]. Journal of Agricultural University of Heibei, 2015, 38(4):1-7. | |
[22] |
王本洋, 余世孝. 种群分布格局的多尺度分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005,(2):235-241.
DOI |
WANG Benyang, YU Shixiao. Multi-scale analyses of population distribution patterns[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2005,(2):235-241. | |
[23] |
杜刚锋, 汪江涛, 孙雪冰, 等. 不同灌溉方式和灌水量对棉花冠层叶铃配置的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(7):1177-1186.
DOI |
DU Gangfen, WANG Jiangtao, SUN Xuebing, et al. Effects of Irrigation Method and Irrigation Amount on Cotton Crown Leaf Boll Configuration[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(7):1177-1186.
DOI |
|
[24] | 郑重, 马富裕, 白萍, 等. 膜下滴灌不同水肥条件下棉花群体冠层结构分析[J]. 西北农业学报, 2001,(1):84-87. |
ZHENG Zhong, MA Fuyu, BAI Ping, et al. Analysis of cotton canopy structure with treatments of different water and fertilizers under mulch drip irrigation[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2001,(1):84-87. | |
[25] | 姚贺盛. 新疆棉花机采模式下高光效冠层结构特征及调控研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2018. |
YAO Hesheng. Research on the Canopy Structure Characteristics of High Photosynthetic Efficiency and Its Regulation Mechanism in Machine-Harvested Cotton[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2018. | |
[26] |
王秀媛, 马卉, 高宏云, 等. 新疆北部棉花冠层结构特征对滴灌定额的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(12):4169-4176.
DOI |
WANG Xiuyuan, MA Hui, GAO Hongyun, et al. Responses of cotton canopy structure characteristics to drip irrigation quota in north Xinjiang, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(12):4169-4176.
DOI |
|
[27] |
张旺锋, 王振林, 余松烈, 等. 种植密度对新疆高产棉花群体光合作用、冠层结构及产量形成的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2004,(2):164-171.
DOI |
ZHANG Wangfen, WANG Zhengling, YU Songlie, et al. Effects of planting density on canopy photosynthesis,canopy structure and yield formation of high-yield cotton in Xinjiang, China[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2004,(2):164-171. | |
[28] | 杨成勋. 化学打顶对棉花植株形态、冠层结构及群体光合生产的影响[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2016. |
YANG Chengxun. Effects of chemical topping on plant morphological, canopy structure, and canopy photosynthetic production of cotton[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2016. | |
[29] | 王娟, 胡强, 徐雅光, 等. 不同灌水量对棉铃空间分布及产量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2014, 23(3):62-66. |
WANG Juan, HU Qiang, XU Yaquang, et al. The influences of irrigation quantity on spatial distribution of cotton bolls and yield[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2014, 23(3):62-66. | |
[30] | Rautiainen M M,? ttus M, Stenberg P. On the relationship of canopy LAI and photon recollision probability in boreal forests[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2009, (113): 458-461. |
[31] | 韩焕勇, 王方永, 陈兵, 等. 不同种植密度下棉花叶面积指数与群体透光率的关系研究[J]. 中国棉花, 2014, 41(7):14-16. |
HAN Huanyong, WANG Fangyong, CHEN Bing, et al. Study on cotton leaf area index and transmittance application of different planting density[J]. China Cotton, 2014, 41(7):14-16. | |
[32] | 辛明华, 李小飞, 韩迎春, 等. 不同行距配置对南疆机采棉生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 中国棉花, 2020, 47(2):13-17. |
XIN Minghua, LI Xiaofei, HAN Yingchun, et al. Effects of Different Row Spacing Configurations on the Growth and Development and Yield of Machine-Picked Cotton in Southern Xinjiang[J]. China Cotton, 2020, 47(2):13-17. | |
[33] |
刘梅先, 杨劲松, 李晓明, 等. 膜下滴灌条件下滴水量和滴水频率对棉田土壤水分分布及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(12):3203-3210.
PMID |
LIU Meixian, YANG Jinsong, LI Xiaoming, et al. Effects of irrigation amount and frequency on soil water distribution and water use efficiency in a cotton field under mulched drip irrigation[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(12):3203-3210.
PMID |
|
[34] | Fereres E, Soriano M A. Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2007, (58):147-159. |
[1] | LIU Haijun, ZHANG Hao, WANG Yifan, CHEN Maoguang, WU Fengquan, LIN Tao, TANG Qiuxiang. Effects of different mulching materials and irrigation on yield formation and effective accumulated temperature production efficiency of machine-picked cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2091-2100. |
[2] | CHEN Maoguang, LIN Tao, ZHANG Hao, LIU Haijun, WANG Yifan, TANG Qiuxiang. Effects of mulch film types on cotton growth and analysis of self-degradation recycling characteristics [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108. |
[3] | YANG Guojiang, CHEN Yun, LIN Xiangqun, HE Jiangyong, LIU Shenglin, QU Yongqing. Effects of organic fertilizer replacement on the yield and nutrient absorption of cotton and nitrate nitrogen under chemical fertilizer reduction [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145. |
[4] | CHEN Chuanxin, ZHNAG Yongqiang, NIE Shihui, KONG Depeng, Sailihan Sai, XU Qijiang, LEI Junjie. Effects of biomass charcoal application rate on the growth, development, and yield of winter wheat under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2146-2151. |
[5] | WANG Lihong, ZHANG Hongzhi, ZHANG Yueqiang, LI Jianfeng, WANG Zhong, GAO Xin, SHI Jia, WANG Chunsheng, XIA Jianqiang, FAN Zheru. Analysis of dry matter production, transport and nitrogen fertilizer utilization caused by yield Gap at different yield levels of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2152-2162. |
[6] | WANG Xiaoyu, WANG Xiaoping, SHI Wenyu, LIU Meiyan, MA Jian, GUO Yunpeng, SONG Ruixin, WANG Qingtao. Responses of photosynthetic characteristics, dry matter accumulation and yield to drought stress in winter wheat at jointing stage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2163-2172. |
[7] | XIANG Li, WANG Xian, DONG Yusheng, GUO Xiaoling, FANG Furong, CHEN Zhijun, MA Yanming, MIAO Yu. Effects of exogenous butyric acid on yield and quality of barley under drought stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2173-2181. |
[8] | YANG Hongmei, ZHANG Yueqiang, SHI Yingwu, Omarjan Kurban, LIN Qing, WANG Ning, CHU Min, ZENG Jun. Effects of different types of foliar fertilizers on grain yield and 1uality of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2182-2188. |
[9] | WANG Xin, LIN Tao, CUI Jianping, WU Fengquan, TANG Zhixuan, CUI Laiyuan, GUO Rensong, WANG Liang, ZHENG Zipiao. Effects of planting mode and irrigation quota on yield and fiber quality of machine-picked long-staple cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1821-1829. |
[10] | DONG Yanxue, JIA Yonghong, ZHANG Jinshan, LI Dandan, WANG Kai, LUO Siwei, WANG Runqi, SHI Shubing. Effects of different ecological conditions on dry matter accumulation and yield of spring wheat varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1848-1857. |
[11] | LI Huaisheng, AI Hongyu, MENG Ling, WANG Heya, ZHANG Lei, AI Haifeng. Effects of chasing rate during peak nutrient uptake of transport under n Reduction on spring wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1866-1872. |
[12] | ZHANG Chao, BAI Yungang, ZHENG Ming, XIAO Jun, DING Ping. Synergistic effect of water and fertilizer on grape in extreme arid area [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1931-1939. |
[13] | WANG Ting, ZHANG Li, ZHANG Fanfan, HUANG Rongzheng, LI Xiao, ZHANG Yulin, CHEN Yongcheng, ZHAO Jiantao, MA Chunhui. Poduction performance screening and nutritional value evaluation of corn varieties suitable for silage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1596-1605. |
[14] | LIANG Zhiguo, WANG Zepeng, JIA Songnan, FAN Fengcui, LIU Shengyao, ZHANG Zhe, DU Fenghuan, QIN Yong. Effects of different soil moisture on growth, yield, quality and water use efficiency of greenhouse eggplant [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1713-1721. |
[15] | LAI Ning, GENG Qinglong, LI Yongfu, LI Na, XIN Huinan, BU Shengbing, CHEN Shuhuang. Effects of organic manure application combined with chemical fertilizer on yield, nitrogen, phosphorus uptake and utilization, and soil fertility of the extremely-late winter sown wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1335-1343. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||