新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (11): 2853-2860.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.11.029
• 农业装备工程与机械化·草业 • 上一篇
闫紫烟1(), 魏岩1(), 安忻蕾1, 陆倩1, 孙慧芳1, 严成2
收稿日期:
2023-02-26
出版日期:
2023-11-20
发布日期:
2023-12-07
通信作者:
魏岩(1966-),女,河南镇平县人,教授,博士,硕士/博士生导师,研究方向草地植物资源及其利用,(E-mail)weiyan1966@163.com
作者简介:
闫紫烟(1997-),女,新疆阿克苏人,硕士研究生,研究方向为草原学,(E-mail)1270950974@qq.com
基金资助:
YAN Ziyan1(), WEI Yan1(), AN Xinlei1, LU Qian1, SUN Huifang1, YAN Cheng2
Received:
2023-02-26
Online:
2023-11-20
Published:
2023-12-07
Correspondence author:
WEI Yan(1966-), female, doctor, grassland plant resources and utilization, (E-mail)weiyan1966@163.com
Supported by:
摘要:
【目的】 研究准噶尔荒漠蔷薇猪毛菜的种子异型性与萌发特性,为种子异型性在荒漠条件下的生态适应机制及进化提供理论依据。【方法】 蔷薇猪毛菜(Salsola rosacea)为研究对象,依据种子的形状、大小、颜色和着生方式对种子分类并研究不同类型种子的萌发特性,根据植株干重对植株进行等级划分后计算其繁殖分配与种子输出。【结果】 蔷薇猪毛菜可产生3种类型种子,A型为绿色具翅种子且萌发率高,B、C型为黄色短翅/无翅种子且存在休眠;A、B型繁殖体繁殖分配比例随植株等级增加而增加,表现出对植株个体大小的依赖,C型则不表现依赖;A型种子输出比例随植株等级的增加而减少,B型种子随等级增加而增加,对植株个体大小表现依赖性,C型种子输出无明显波动。【结论】 蔷薇猪毛菜能够产生3种具有不同散布方式和萌发行为的种子,其繁殖分配与种子输出对植株大小产生依赖。
中图分类号:
闫紫烟, 魏岩, 安忻蕾, 陆倩, 孙慧芳, 严成. 准噶尔荒漠蔷薇猪毛菜的种子异型性与萌发特性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(11): 2853-2860.
YAN Ziyan, WEI Yan, AN Xinlei, LU Qian, SUN Huifang, YAN Cheng. Seed heteromorphism and germination characteristics of Salsola rosacea in the Junggar Desert[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2853-2860.
植株等级 Class of plant | 植株干重 Plant biomass (g) | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 节数 No. of nodes | 分枝数 No. of branches |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 1.110±0.100c | 28.617±1.430c | 24.460±1.499c | 2.960±0.643c |
Ⅱ | 3.708±0.235b | 43.556±1.005b | 45.400±1.993b | 9.630±0.856b |
Ⅲ | 8.941±1.680a | 49.533±3.979a | 55.000±2.031a | 18.500±2.377a |
表1 蔷薇猪毛菜不同大小个体的形态特征(平均值±标准误)
Table 1 The morphological characteristics of Salsola rosacea with different sizes (M±SE)
植株等级 Class of plant | 植株干重 Plant biomass (g) | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 节数 No. of nodes | 分枝数 No. of branches |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 1.110±0.100c | 28.617±1.430c | 24.460±1.499c | 2.960±0.643c |
Ⅱ | 3.708±0.235b | 43.556±1.005b | 45.400±1.993b | 9.630±0.856b |
Ⅲ | 8.941±1.680a | 49.533±3.979a | 55.000±2.031a | 18.500±2.377a |
种子类型 Seed types | 颜色 Color | 形状 Shape | 翅 Wings | 长 Length (mm) | 种子单粒重 Seed single weight (mg) | 着生方式 Orientation of seed |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 绿色 | 圆形 | 长 | 2.451±0.036a | 3.124±0.057a | 横生 |
B | 黄色 | 圆形 | 短 | 1.700±0.022b | 1.725±0.032b | 横生 |
C | 黄色 | 圆形 | 无 | 1.348±0.063c | 1.522±0.026c | 横生 |
表2 蔷薇猪毛菜3种类型种子特征比较(平均值±标准误)
Table 2 Comparison of seed characteristics of three types of Salsola rosacea (M±SE)
种子类型 Seed types | 颜色 Color | 形状 Shape | 翅 Wings | 长 Length (mm) | 种子单粒重 Seed single weight (mg) | 着生方式 Orientation of seed |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 绿色 | 圆形 | 长 | 2.451±0.036a | 3.124±0.057a | 横生 |
B | 黄色 | 圆形 | 短 | 1.700±0.022b | 1.725±0.032b | 横生 |
C | 黄色 | 圆形 | 无 | 1.348±0.063c | 1.522±0.026c | 横生 |
植株等级 Class | 繁殖体总生物量 Total (g) | 繁殖分配 Reproductive allocation (%) | 总繁殖分配 Total (%) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | A | B | C | ||||
Ⅰ | 0.113±0.010Ac | 0.012±0.003Bc | 0.013±0.002Bc | 10.214±0.422Aa | 0.876±0.190Ba | 1.166±0.167Ba | 12.256±0.453b | ||
Ⅱ | 0.397±0.034Ab | 0.042±0.007Bb | 0.035±0.006Bb | 11.069±0.343Aa | 1.121±0.163Ba | 0.943±0.148Ba | 13.132±0.283ab | ||
Ⅲ | 0.968±0.099Aa | 0.118±0.019Ba | 0.121±0.009Ba | 11.561±0.340Aa | 1.397±0.166Ba | 1.474±0.096Ba | 14.432±0.252a |
表3 蔷薇猪毛菜不同大小个体的繁殖分配(平均值±标准误)
Table 3 The reproductive allocation of Salsola rosacea individuals with different sizes (M±SE)
植株等级 Class | 繁殖体总生物量 Total (g) | 繁殖分配 Reproductive allocation (%) | 总繁殖分配 Total (%) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | A | B | C | ||||
Ⅰ | 0.113±0.010Ac | 0.012±0.003Bc | 0.013±0.002Bc | 10.214±0.422Aa | 0.876±0.190Ba | 1.166±0.167Ba | 12.256±0.453b | ||
Ⅱ | 0.397±0.034Ab | 0.042±0.007Bb | 0.035±0.006Bb | 11.069±0.343Aa | 1.121±0.163Ba | 0.943±0.148Ba | 13.132±0.283ab | ||
Ⅲ | 0.968±0.099Aa | 0.118±0.019Ba | 0.121±0.009Ba | 11.561±0.340Aa | 1.397±0.166Ba | 1.474±0.096Ba | 14.432±0.252a |
植株等级 Class of plant | 种子总数 Total | 种子数量 No. of seeds | 种子输出 Seed output (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | A | B | C | ||
Ⅰ | 49.739± 4.155c | 38.609± 3.401Ac | 3.913± 0.829Bc | 7.217± 1.274Bc | 77.931± 2.570Aa | 7.457± 1.634Cb | 14.612± 1.906Ba |
Ⅱ | 186.539± 16.266b | 135.692± 11.439Ab | 26.692± 3.830Bb | 24.154± 3.641Bb | 73.532± 2.571Aab | 13.887± 1.354Ba | 12.581± 1.587Ba |
Ⅲ | 451.167± 53.639a | 301.500± 36.846Aa | 71.000± 9.957Ba | 78.667± 8.515Ba | 66.762± 1.019Ab | 15.564± 1.049Ba | 17.673± 0.930Ba |
表4 蔷薇猪毛菜不同大小个体的种子输出变化
Table 4 The seed output of Salsola rosacea individuals with different sizes
植株等级 Class of plant | 种子总数 Total | 种子数量 No. of seeds | 种子输出 Seed output (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | A | B | C | ||
Ⅰ | 49.739± 4.155c | 38.609± 3.401Ac | 3.913± 0.829Bc | 7.217± 1.274Bc | 77.931± 2.570Aa | 7.457± 1.634Cb | 14.612± 1.906Ba |
Ⅱ | 186.539± 16.266b | 135.692± 11.439Ab | 26.692± 3.830Bb | 24.154± 3.641Bb | 73.532± 2.571Aab | 13.887± 1.354Ba | 12.581± 1.587Ba |
Ⅲ | 451.167± 53.639a | 301.500± 36.846Aa | 71.000± 9.957Ba | 78.667± 8.515Ba | 66.762± 1.019Ab | 15.564± 1.049Ba | 17.673± 0.930Ba |
图2 蔷薇猪毛菜3种类型种子在不同变温条件下的最终萌发率变化
Fig.2 The final germination percentages (%±SE) of three types of seeds of Salsola rosacea at different alternating temperatures
图3 蔷薇猪毛菜A型种子在不同变温条件下的累积萌发率变化
Fig.3 The cumulative germination percentages (%±SE) of A type of seeds of Salsola rosacea at different alternating temperatures
偏差来源 Source | 自由度 df | 均方 Meansquare | F | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
种子类型 Type of seed | 2 | 45 817.867 | 1 641.564 | 0 |
温度 Temperature | 4 | 14.267 | 0.511 | 0.728 |
种子类型×温度 Type of seed×Temperature | 8 | 10.867 | 0.389 | 0.921 |
表5 蔷薇猪毛菜不同类型种子与不同温度范围对萌发影响的双因素方差
Table 5 Results of Two-way ANOVA evaluating the effect of different types of seeds and different alternating temperatures on seed germination in Salsola rosacea
偏差来源 Source | 自由度 df | 均方 Meansquare | F | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
种子类型 Type of seed | 2 | 45 817.867 | 1 641.564 | 0 |
温度 Temperature | 4 | 14.267 | 0.511 | 0.728 |
种子类型×温度 Type of seed×Temperature | 8 | 10.867 | 0.389 | 0.921 |
[1] |
Venable D L. The evolutionary ecology of seed heteromorphism[J]. American Naturalist, 1985, 126(5):577-595.
DOI URL |
[2] |
王雷, 董鸣, 黄振英. 种子异型性及其生态意义的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(5):578-590.
DOI |
WANG Lei, DONG Ming, HUANG Zhenying. Review of research on seed heteromorphism and its ecological significance[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(5):578-590.
DOI |
|
[3] |
Mandák B, Pysek P. How does seed heteromorphism influence the life history stages of Atriplex sagittata (Chenopodiaceae)[J]. Flora, 2005, 200(6):516-526.
DOI URL |
[4] | Baskin C C, Baskin J M. Seeds: Ecology,Biogeography and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination[M]. San Diego: Academic Press,1998. |
[5] | 李伟强, 刘小京, 毛任钊, 等. 植物种子二形性(多形性)研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(4):1234-1242. |
LI Weiqiang, LIU Xiaojing, MAO Renzhao, et al. Advances in plant seed dimorphism (or polymorphism) research[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(4):1234-1242. | |
[6] | Wei Y, Dong M, Huang ZY. Seed polymorphism, dormancy and germination of Salsola affinis (Chenopodiaceae), a dominant desert annual inhabiting Junggar Basin of Xinjiang, China[J]. Austalian Journal of Botany, 2007, 55(4): 464-470. |
[7] | Gul B, Ansari R, Flowers T J, et al. Germination strategies of halophyte seeds under salinity[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2013, (92): 4-18. |
[8] | 周平, 黄俊华. 果翅、盐分及干旱胁迫对白梭梭种子萌发的影响[J]. 防护林科技, 2012,(3): 9-13. |
ZHOU Ping, HUANG Junhua. Effect of winged perianth, salt & drought stress on germination of Halaxylonpersicum[J]. Protection Forest Science and Technology, 2012,(3): 9-13. | |
[9] | 毛祖美. 新疆植物志[M]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆科学技术出版社. 1994. |
MAO Zumei. Flora of Xinjiang[M]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Science&Technology Press. 1994. | |
[10] |
Imbert E. Ecological consequences and ontogeny of seed heteromorphism[J]. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2002, 5(1): 13-36.
DOI URL |
[11] | Harper J L, Lovell P H, Moore K G. The shapes and sizes of seeds[J]. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 1970, (1): 327-356. |
[12] | UngarI A. Population ecology of halophyte seeds[J]. Boeanical Review, 1987, 53(3): 301-334. |
[13] |
耿宇鹏, 张文驹, 李博, 等. 表型可塑性与外来植物的入侵能力[J]. 生物多样性, 2004, (4):447-455.
DOI |
GENG Yupeng, ZHANG Wenju, LI Bo, et al. Phenotypic plasticity and invasiveness of alien plants[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2004, 12(4): 447-455.
DOI |
|
[14] | Harper J L. Population Biology of Plants[M]. London: Academic Press, 1977. |
[15] |
王宏飞, 魏岩. 紫翅猪毛菜的种子多型性及其结实格局[J]. 生物多样性, 2007, 15(4):419-424.
DOI |
WANG Hongfei, WEI Yan. Seed polymorphism and fruit-set patterns of Salsola affinis[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2007, 15(4):419-424.
DOI |
|
[16] | 魏岩, 王宏飞, 安沙舟. 散枝猪毛菜的果实多型性及个体大小依赖的繁殖输出[J]. 干旱区研究, 2008, 25(3):357-362. |
WEI Yan, WANG Hongfei, AN Shazhou. Studyon fruit polymorphismand size-dependent reproductive output of Salsola bracchita[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2008, 25(3):357-362. | |
[17] | Pickering C M. Size dependent reproduction in Australian alpine ranunculus[J]. Australian Journal of Botany, 1994, 19(3): 336-344. |
[18] |
Dorken M E, Sch B. Phenotypic plasticity of vegetative and reproductive traits in monoecious and dioecious populations of Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae): a clonal aquatic plant[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2004, 92(1): 32-44.
DOI URL |
[19] | 张大勇. 理论生态学研究[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000:10-14,32-38. |
ZHANG Dayong. Research on Theoretical Ecology[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000:10-14,32-38. | |
[20] |
Thompson P A. Variations in seed size within populations of Silene dioica (L.) Clairv in relation to habitat[J]. Annals of Botany, 1981, 47(5): 623-634.
DOI URL |
[21] |
Sultan S E. Phenotypic plasticity for fitness components in species of contrasting ecological breadth[J]. Ecology, 2001, 82(2): 328-343.
DOI URL |
[22] |
Sultan S E, Bazzaz F A. Phenotypic plasticity in Polygonumpersicaria II. Norms of reaction to soil moisture ecological breadth and the maintenance of genetic diversity[J]. Evolution, 1993, 47(4): 1032-1049.
DOI PMID |
[23] |
Ellison A M. Effect of Seed dimorphism on the density-dependent dynamics of experimental populations of Atriplex triangularis (Chenopodiaceae)[J]. American Journal of Botany, 1987, 74(8): 1280-1288.
DOI URL |
[24] |
LloydD G. Selection of offspring size at independence and other size-versus-number strategies[J]. American Naturalist, 1987, 129(6): 800-817.
DOI URL |
[25] | Venable D L. The evolutionary ecology of seed heteromorphism[J]. American Naturalist, 1985, 12(6): 577-595. |
[26] |
Cao D C, Baskin C C, Baskin J M, et al. Comparison of germination and seed bank dynamics of dimorphic seeds of the cold desert halophyte Suaedacorniculata subsp. Mongolica[J]. Annals of Botany, 2012, 110(8): 1545-1558.
DOI URL |
[27] |
Lu JJ, Tan D Y, Baskin J M, et al. Phenotypic plasticity and bet-hedging in a heterocarpic winter annual/spring ephemeral cold desert species of Brassicaceae[J]. Oikos, 2012, 121(3): 357-366.
DOI URL |
[28] | Baskin J M, Lu J J, Baskin C C, et al. Diaspore dispersal ability and degree of dormancy in heteromorphic species of cold deserts of northwest China: a review[J]. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2014, (16): 93-99. |
[29] |
Jansen P A, Bongers F, Van Der Meer P J. Is farther seed dispersal better Spatial patterns of offspring mortality in three rainforest tree species with different dispersal abilities[J]. Ecography (Cop.), 2008, 31(1): 43-52.
DOI URL |
[30] |
Tielb rger K, Petru M F X, Lampei C. Bet-hedging germination in annual plants: a sound empirical test of the theoretical foundations[J]. Oikos, 2012, 121(11): 1860-1868.
DOI URL |
[31] |
Gremer J R, Kimball S, Venable D L. Within-and among-year germination in Sonoran Desert winter annuals: bet hedging and predictive germination in a variable environment[J]. Ecology letters, 2016, 19(10):1209-1218.
DOI PMID |
[32] |
Hutchings M J, Booth K D. Studies on the feasibility of re-creating chalk grassland vegetation on ex-arable land. I. The potential roles of the seed bank and the seed rain[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1996, 33(5):1171-1181.
DOI URL |
[33] | Anderson T M, Schutz M, Risch A C. Seed germination cues and the importance of the soil seed bank across an environmental gradient in the Serengeti[J]. Oikos, 2012,(121): 306-312. |
[34] | 刘华峰. 紫翅猪毛菜种子异时萌发的生态适应性研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2013. |
LIU Huafeng. The ecological adaptability research of Salsola affinis seeds on different germinating time[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2013. |
[1] | 鞠乐, 齐军仓, 陈培育, 牛银亭, 阴志刚. 干旱胁迫对大麦种子萌发、幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1879-1886. |
[2] | 肖菁, 刘宁, 许明海, 张金波, 马艳明, 王莉, 徐麟. NaCl胁迫对糜子种子萌发的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1623-1629. |
[3] | 来汉林, 沈煜洋, 陈利, 杨红, 李月, 雷钧杰, 李广阔, 高海峰. 温度和盐胁迫对播娘蒿种子萌发特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1326-1334. |
[4] | 杨金钰, 乔小燕, 王西和, 孙九胜. NaCl胁迫对3种饲草种子萌发的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(2): 448-453. |
[5] | 熊韬, 闫淼, 王豪杰, 毛建才, 王江涛, 胡国智. 盐碱胁迫对甜瓜种子萌发及幼苗生长发育的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(8): 1965-1974. |
[6] | 陈家力, 姜喜, 谭占明, 杨明禄, 肖海兵. 3种盐胁迫对桂桑优12种子萌发特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(1): 205-214. |
[7] | 麻冬, 艾比布拉·伊马木, 哈里木拉提·努热合买提. 木地肤种子包衣材料的筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(2): 352-360. |
[8] | 吴小媚, 袁延平, 魏肖如, 曹福祥, 陈己任, 吕长平, 李玉帆. 预处理及培养方法协同作用对新铁炮百合种子萌发的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(7): 1276-1286. |
[9] | 赵海蓓, 危常州, 张新疆, 吕小凡, 陈英花. 腐植酸浸种对玉米种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(11): 2118-2125. |
[10] | 申吴燕, 吐尔逊娜依·热依木, 雪热提江·麦提努日, 邓婷婷, 黄长福, 王梦, 马伊王利, 麻浩. 12种植物萌发期耐盐性筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(10): 1912-1920. |
[11] | 库尼都孜阿依·吐尔汗, 任毅, 颜安, 石书兵, 张芳, 时晓磊, 耿洪伟. 新疆冬小麦品种萌发期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质的筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(1): 20-31. |
[12] | 王颖, 王兰, 马艳, 马小艳. 环境因素对新疆不同地区田旋花种子萌发的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(5): 890-898. |
[13] | 张金汕,贾永红,孙鹏,刘俊,帕日旦·买提库尔班,谢日排姆·艾柯木,石书兵. 施钾和叶面喷施赤霉素对春小麦种子萌发的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(8): 1384-1391. |
[14] | 热孜亚·麦麦提,顾元国,李强,王娟,侯献飞,贾东海,买买提·伊明. 盐和干旱胁迫对芥菜型油菜种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(10): 1819-1828. |
[15] | 李柯,施宠,李昊宇,王文全,李阳. 重金属Cd胁迫下内生真菌感染对德兰臭草种子萌发及生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(10): 1916-1926. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||