新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (5): 1190-1199.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.05.018
刘衍晨1,2(), 刘志刚3, 白新慧1, 乔鹏1, 徐诚1, 白慧敏1, 张娟1,2()
收稿日期:
2022-10-08
出版日期:
2023-05-20
发布日期:
2023-05-22
通信作者:
张娟(1977-),女,山西太谷人,副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为设施栽培,(E-mail)作者简介:
刘衍晨(1997-),男,新疆哈密人,硕士研究生,研究方向为设施栽培,(E-mail)1847194299@qq.com
基金资助:
LIU Yanchen1,2(), LIU Zhigang3, BAI Xinhui1, QIAO Peng1, XU Cheng1, BAI Huiming1, ZHANG Juan1,2()
Received:
2022-10-08
Online:
2023-05-20
Published:
2023-05-22
Correspondence author:
ZHANG Juan (1977- ), female, native place: Taigu, Shanxi. Master's degree advisor, research field: Facility Cultivation (E-mail)Supported by:
摘要:
【目的】选用新疆南疆产蛭石复配菇渣、炉渣,筛选出适合南疆温室辣椒育苗的基质配方。【方法】于2021年5~7月在塔里木大学园艺试验站连栋温室内进行辣椒育苗试验,采用随机区组设计,以纯蛭石作为对照,设置7个处理组,测定不同基质配方的理化性质及辣椒的株高、茎粗、根面积、可溶性糖含量等生长与生理指标。【结果】CK(纯蛭石)可以为辣椒提供良好的根系生长环境,除T2(蛭石:炉渣:菇渣的体积比为1∶0∶1)、T4(蛭石∶炉渣∶菇渣的体积比为1∶1∶1)处理,其余处理组合的理化性质都符合辣椒育苗基质标准。八叶一心时T2株高最高为8.5 cm、CK茎粗最粗为1.59 cm、T7(蛭石∶炉渣∶菇渣的体积比为4∶1∶1)叶面积最大为4.41 cm2,CK出苗率最高为90%、根系生长也最好分别为主根长度93.25 mm、根面积511.29 mm2、根尖数21.33个、根平均长度49.8 mm,生理指标中T1(蛭石∶炉渣∶菇渣的体积比为1∶1∶0)均相对最优分别为,Chla为0.62 mg/cm2、Chla+b为0.82 mg/cm2、Caros为0.57 mg/cm2、可溶性糖含量为0.66 mS/cm、可溶性蛋白含量为0.78 mS/cm,CK的Chlb、Anths含量最高分别为0.25、0.04 mg/cm2。【结论】菇渣与蛭石的协同性较差不适宜混用培育辣椒幼苗;蛭石与炉渣的协同性较好,在新疆南疆温室条件下,CK(纯蛭石)适合培育辣椒幼苗。
中图分类号:
刘衍晨, 刘志刚, 白新慧, 乔鹏, 徐诚, 白慧敏, 张娟. 蛭石复混基质对辣椒育苗的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1190-1199.
LIU Yanchen, LIU Zhigang, BAI Xinhui, QIAO Peng, XU Cheng, BAI Huiming, ZHANG Juan. The effect of vermiculite compound matrix on pepper seedling cultivation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1190-1199.
处理 Treatments | 基质体积比Matrix volume ratio | ||
---|---|---|---|
蛭石 Vermiculite | 炉渣 Slag | 菇渣 Mushroom residue | |
CK | 1 | 0 | 0 |
T1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
T2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
T3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
T4 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
T5 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
T6 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
T7 | 4 | 1 | 1 |
表1 不同基质配方
Tab.1 Different matrix formulations
处理 Treatments | 基质体积比Matrix volume ratio | ||
---|---|---|---|
蛭石 Vermiculite | 炉渣 Slag | 菇渣 Mushroom residue | |
CK | 1 | 0 | 0 |
T1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
T2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
T3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
T4 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
T5 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
T6 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
T7 | 4 | 1 | 1 |
处理 Treatments | 容重 Bulk density (g/cm3) | 总孔隙 Total porosity (%) | 通气孔隙 Vent pores (%) | 持水孔隙 Water holding pores(%) | 气水比 Air-water ratio | pH | EC (mS/cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 0.21±0.01f | 94.15±0.05a | 26.74±0.10a | 67.39±0.09a | 0.40±0.00a | 8.47±0.01a | 0.35±0.01h |
T1 | 0.65±0.00a | 69.34±0.08f | 16.67±0.21e | 52.57±0.36e | 0.32±0.00c | 7.31±0.01e | 0.58±0.01e |
T2 | 0.45±0.01b | 58.61±0.39g | 6.00±0.66g | 52.61±0.36e | 0.11±0.01e | 7.13±0.06ef | 2.45±0.03a |
T3 | 0.43±0.00c | 81.53±0.26c | 21.72±0.06c | 59.78±0.29c | 0.36±0.00b | 7.89±0.01c | 0.47±0.01f |
T4 | 0.45±0.00b | 47.33±0.14h | 3.66±0.58h | 43.67±0.49f | 0.08±0.01f | 7.00±0.17f | 1.76±0.01b |
T5 | 0.42±0.01d | 72.88±0.13e | 15.57±0.23f | 57.28±0.08d | 0.27±0.00d | 7.50±0.01d | 1.47±0.01c |
T6 | 0.36±0.01e | 86.43±0.08b | 23.62±0.15b | 62.41±0.05b | 0.38±0.00ab | 8.17±0.01b | 0.43±0.01g |
T7 | 0.41±0.01d | 78.34±0.03d | 18.48±0.36d | 59.61±0.29c | 0.31±0.01c | 7.57±0.01d | 1.31±0.01d |
表2 不同基质配比的物理性质
Tab.2 Physical properties of different matrix ratios
处理 Treatments | 容重 Bulk density (g/cm3) | 总孔隙 Total porosity (%) | 通气孔隙 Vent pores (%) | 持水孔隙 Water holding pores(%) | 气水比 Air-water ratio | pH | EC (mS/cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 0.21±0.01f | 94.15±0.05a | 26.74±0.10a | 67.39±0.09a | 0.40±0.00a | 8.47±0.01a | 0.35±0.01h |
T1 | 0.65±0.00a | 69.34±0.08f | 16.67±0.21e | 52.57±0.36e | 0.32±0.00c | 7.31±0.01e | 0.58±0.01e |
T2 | 0.45±0.01b | 58.61±0.39g | 6.00±0.66g | 52.61±0.36e | 0.11±0.01e | 7.13±0.06ef | 2.45±0.03a |
T3 | 0.43±0.00c | 81.53±0.26c | 21.72±0.06c | 59.78±0.29c | 0.36±0.00b | 7.89±0.01c | 0.47±0.01f |
T4 | 0.45±0.00b | 47.33±0.14h | 3.66±0.58h | 43.67±0.49f | 0.08±0.01f | 7.00±0.17f | 1.76±0.01b |
T5 | 0.42±0.01d | 72.88±0.13e | 15.57±0.23f | 57.28±0.08d | 0.27±0.00d | 7.50±0.01d | 1.47±0.01c |
T6 | 0.36±0.01e | 86.43±0.08b | 23.62±0.15b | 62.41±0.05b | 0.38±0.00ab | 8.17±0.01b | 0.43±0.01g |
T7 | 0.41±0.01d | 78.34±0.03d | 18.48±0.36d | 59.61±0.29c | 0.31±0.01c | 7.57±0.01d | 1.31±0.01d |
处理 Treat- ments | 速效氮含量 Available nitrogen content (mg/kg) | 速效磷含量 Available phosphorus content (mg/kg) | 速效钾含量 Available potassium content (mg/kg) | 钙含量 Calcium content (g/kg) | 镁含量 Magnesium content (g/kg) | 有机质含量 Organic matter content (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 3.97±0.20f | 20.55±0.58d | 135.72±7.59f | 10.34±0.43g | 103.57±4.20a | 0.72±0.09d |
T1 | 11.67±0.88e | 10.53±0.26e | 457.18±12.45e | 26.34±0.26d | 19.02±0.43f | 10.38±0.32bc |
T2 | 120.03±3.25a | 142.41±4.64a | 5 317.59±116.48a | 43.70±0.86c | 39.51±1.18d | 10.11±0.22c |
T3 | 10.90±0.93e | 17.77±0.19d | 417.59±16.43e | 16.91±0.51e | 32.46±0.78e | 11.24±0.28a |
T4 | 109.78±4.09b | 107.99±7.05b | 3 377.41±51.75b | 50.58±0.76a | 17.73±0.21f | 10.47±0.25bc |
T5 | 96.02±2.67c | 92.31±2.59b | 2 513.54±147.49c | 47.25±0.65b | 14.97±0.24f | 10.96±0.22ab |
T6 | 7.97±0.20f | 20.22±0.30e | 356.42±9.10e | 13.43±0.76f | 63.40±1.38c | 10.29±0.27bc |
T7 | 86.10±1.95d | 62.22±3.88c | 1 600.19±36.32d | 12.35±0.93f | 91.60±1.59b | 10.01±0.24c |
表3 不同基质配比的化学性质
Tab.3 Chemical properties of different matrix ratios
处理 Treat- ments | 速效氮含量 Available nitrogen content (mg/kg) | 速效磷含量 Available phosphorus content (mg/kg) | 速效钾含量 Available potassium content (mg/kg) | 钙含量 Calcium content (g/kg) | 镁含量 Magnesium content (g/kg) | 有机质含量 Organic matter content (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 3.97±0.20f | 20.55±0.58d | 135.72±7.59f | 10.34±0.43g | 103.57±4.20a | 0.72±0.09d |
T1 | 11.67±0.88e | 10.53±0.26e | 457.18±12.45e | 26.34±0.26d | 19.02±0.43f | 10.38±0.32bc |
T2 | 120.03±3.25a | 142.41±4.64a | 5 317.59±116.48a | 43.70±0.86c | 39.51±1.18d | 10.11±0.22c |
T3 | 10.90±0.93e | 17.77±0.19d | 417.59±16.43e | 16.91±0.51e | 32.46±0.78e | 11.24±0.28a |
T4 | 109.78±4.09b | 107.99±7.05b | 3 377.41±51.75b | 50.58±0.76a | 17.73±0.21f | 10.47±0.25bc |
T5 | 96.02±2.67c | 92.31±2.59b | 2 513.54±147.49c | 47.25±0.65b | 14.97±0.24f | 10.96±0.22ab |
T6 | 7.97±0.20f | 20.22±0.30e | 356.42±9.10e | 13.43±0.76f | 63.40±1.38c | 10.29±0.27bc |
T7 | 86.10±1.95d | 62.22±3.88c | 1 600.19±36.32d | 12.35±0.93f | 91.60±1.59b | 10.01±0.24c |
处理 Treat- ments | 出苗率 Emergence rate(%) | 根冠比 Root shoot ratio | 壮苗指数 Strong seedling index |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 90±4a | 0.50±0.02a | 0.105±0.010a |
T1 | 81±2a | 0.34±0.02b | 0.088±0.013ab |
T2 | 83±2a | 0.22±0.06bc | 0.070±0.021abc |
T3 | 90±2a | 0.17±0.12c | 0.066±0.007bc |
T4 | 88±7a | 0.25±0.06bc | 0.062±0.020bc |
T5 | 87±7a | 0.27±0.03bc | 0.062±0.003bc |
T6 | 88±5a | 0.32±0.06bc | 0.056±0.008bc |
T7 | 89±3a | 0.24±0.01bc | 0.042±0.007c |
表4 不同基质配比下辣椒育苗变化
Tab.4 The effect of different substrate ratios on pepper seedlings
处理 Treat- ments | 出苗率 Emergence rate(%) | 根冠比 Root shoot ratio | 壮苗指数 Strong seedling index |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 90±4a | 0.50±0.02a | 0.105±0.010a |
T1 | 81±2a | 0.34±0.02b | 0.088±0.013ab |
T2 | 83±2a | 0.22±0.06bc | 0.070±0.021abc |
T3 | 90±2a | 0.17±0.12c | 0.066±0.007bc |
T4 | 88±7a | 0.25±0.06bc | 0.062±0.020bc |
T5 | 87±7a | 0.27±0.03bc | 0.062±0.003bc |
T6 | 88±5a | 0.32±0.06bc | 0.056±0.008bc |
T7 | 89±3a | 0.24±0.01bc | 0.042±0.007c |
处理 Treatments | 主根长度 Tap root length (mm) | 根面积 Root area (mm2) | 根尖数 Number of root tips (个) | 根平均长度 Average root length (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 93.25±1.16a | 511.29±11.64a | 21.33±1.53a | 49.8±1.87a |
T1 | 17.45±0.23f | 216.84±2.15e | 10.33±0.58c | 8.63±0.29f |
T2 | 28.99±0.52e | 273.54±4.65d | 13.33±0.58bc | 18.04±0.51de |
T3 | 29.03±2.17e | 376.47±3.36b | 12.00±2.65bc | 19.79±0.97d |
T4 | 29.68±1.52e | 218.90±5.26e | 14.00±4.00bc | 15.29±0.6e |
T5 | 56.3±1.27c | 307.74±8.27c | 17.33±1.15ab | 43.55±1.07b |
T6 | 67.8±1.68b | 295.24±6.60c | 13.67±1.15bc | 37.91±1.7c |
T7 | 34.99±0.25d | 303.24±5.15c | 11.33±1.53c | 19.04±0.31d |
表5 不同基质配比下辣椒幼苗根系生长发育变化
Tab.5 Effects of different substrate ratios on the growth and development of pepper seedling roots
处理 Treatments | 主根长度 Tap root length (mm) | 根面积 Root area (mm2) | 根尖数 Number of root tips (个) | 根平均长度 Average root length (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 93.25±1.16a | 511.29±11.64a | 21.33±1.53a | 49.8±1.87a |
T1 | 17.45±0.23f | 216.84±2.15e | 10.33±0.58c | 8.63±0.29f |
T2 | 28.99±0.52e | 273.54±4.65d | 13.33±0.58bc | 18.04±0.51de |
T3 | 29.03±2.17e | 376.47±3.36b | 12.00±2.65bc | 19.79±0.97d |
T4 | 29.68±1.52e | 218.90±5.26e | 14.00±4.00bc | 15.29±0.6e |
T5 | 56.3±1.27c | 307.74±8.27c | 17.33±1.15ab | 43.55±1.07b |
T6 | 67.8±1.68b | 295.24±6.60c | 13.67±1.15bc | 37.91±1.7c |
T7 | 34.99±0.25d | 303.24±5.15c | 11.33±1.53c | 19.04±0.31d |
处理 Treatments | 地上鲜重 Fresh weight on the ground (g) | 地上干重 Ground dry weight (g) | 地下鲜重 Underground fresh weight (g) | 地下干重 Underground dry weight (g) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 1.736±0.048a | 0.119±0.049c | 1.020±0.015a | 0.091±0.014ab |
T1 | 0.958±0.018d | 0.258±0.016bc | 0.647±0.042e | 0.124±0.043a |
T2 | 1.226±0.111c | 0.418±0.111a | 0.469±0.015f | 0.066±0.018b |
T3 | 1.739±0.021a | 0.195±0.022bc | 0.859±0.008bc | 0.065±0.008b |
T4 | 1.178±0.079c | 0.280±0.081ab | 0.514±0.011f | 0.046±0.011b |
T5 | 1.417±0.003b | 0.210±0.008bc | 0.810±0.008cd | 0.057±0.008b |
T6 | 1.265±0.030bc | 0.195±0.029bc | 0.796±0.003d | 0.067±0.003b |
T7 | 1.662±0.027a | 0.264±0.028bc | 0.899±0.004b | 0.065±0.004b |
表6 不同基质配比下辣椒幼苗生物积累量变化
Tab.6 Effects of different substrate ratios on pepper seedling bioaccumulation
处理 Treatments | 地上鲜重 Fresh weight on the ground (g) | 地上干重 Ground dry weight (g) | 地下鲜重 Underground fresh weight (g) | 地下干重 Underground dry weight (g) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 1.736±0.048a | 0.119±0.049c | 1.020±0.015a | 0.091±0.014ab |
T1 | 0.958±0.018d | 0.258±0.016bc | 0.647±0.042e | 0.124±0.043a |
T2 | 1.226±0.111c | 0.418±0.111a | 0.469±0.015f | 0.066±0.018b |
T3 | 1.739±0.021a | 0.195±0.022bc | 0.859±0.008bc | 0.065±0.008b |
T4 | 1.178±0.079c | 0.280±0.081ab | 0.514±0.011f | 0.046±0.011b |
T5 | 1.417±0.003b | 0.210±0.008bc | 0.810±0.008cd | 0.057±0.008b |
T6 | 1.265±0.030bc | 0.195±0.029bc | 0.796±0.003d | 0.067±0.003b |
T7 | 1.662±0.027a | 0.264±0.028bc | 0.899±0.004b | 0.065±0.004b |
处理 Treatments | Chl a (mg/cm2) | Chl b (mg/cm2) | Chl a+b (mg/cm2) | 类胡萝卜素 Caros (mg/cm2) | 花青素 Anths (mg/cm2) | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar (mS/cm) | 可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein (mS/cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 0.51±0.004b | 0.25±0.006a | 0.76±0.008b | 0.50±0.007b | 0.04±0.002a | 0.52±0.021d | 0.66±0.003ab |
T1 | 0.62±0.002a | 0.20±0.006c | 0.82±0.004a | 0.53±0.003a | 0.03±0.001b | 0.66±0.003a | 0.78±0.013a |
T2 | 0.21±0.005g | 0.08±0.003f | 0.29±0.004d | 0.25±0.004h | 0.01±0.001f | 0.47±0.016e | 0.62±0.105b |
T3 | 0.35±0.001f | 0.13±0.005e | 0.48±0.003c | 0.38±0.001g | 0.02±0.001c | 0.65±0.009ab | 0.65±0.020b |
T4 | 0.50±0.003c | 0.20±0.006c | 0.70±0.002b | 0.47±0.002e | 0.02±0.002e | 0.50±0.035de | 0.58±0.065b |
T5 | 0.37±0.001e | 0.15±0.001d | 0.52±0.002c | 0.43±0.000f | 0.02±0.002de | 0.61±0.007bc | 0.69±0.007ab |
T6 | 0.50±0.002c | 0.21±0.001c | 0.71±0.031b | 0.49±0.003d | 0.02±0.001cd | 0.62±0.018abc | 0.64±0.013b |
T7 | 0.49±0.006d | 0.23±0.004b | 0.72±0.003b | 0.50±0.001c | 0.02±0.000cde | 0.59±0.004c | 0.57±0.015b |
表7 不同基质配比下辣椒幼苗生理指标变化
Tab.7 Effects of different substrate ratios on physiological indexes of pepper seedlings
处理 Treatments | Chl a (mg/cm2) | Chl b (mg/cm2) | Chl a+b (mg/cm2) | 类胡萝卜素 Caros (mg/cm2) | 花青素 Anths (mg/cm2) | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar (mS/cm) | 可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein (mS/cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 0.51±0.004b | 0.25±0.006a | 0.76±0.008b | 0.50±0.007b | 0.04±0.002a | 0.52±0.021d | 0.66±0.003ab |
T1 | 0.62±0.002a | 0.20±0.006c | 0.82±0.004a | 0.53±0.003a | 0.03±0.001b | 0.66±0.003a | 0.78±0.013a |
T2 | 0.21±0.005g | 0.08±0.003f | 0.29±0.004d | 0.25±0.004h | 0.01±0.001f | 0.47±0.016e | 0.62±0.105b |
T3 | 0.35±0.001f | 0.13±0.005e | 0.48±0.003c | 0.38±0.001g | 0.02±0.001c | 0.65±0.009ab | 0.65±0.020b |
T4 | 0.50±0.003c | 0.20±0.006c | 0.70±0.002b | 0.47±0.002e | 0.02±0.002e | 0.50±0.035de | 0.58±0.065b |
T5 | 0.37±0.001e | 0.15±0.001d | 0.52±0.002c | 0.43±0.000f | 0.02±0.002de | 0.61±0.007bc | 0.69±0.007ab |
T6 | 0.50±0.002c | 0.21±0.001c | 0.71±0.031b | 0.49±0.003d | 0.02±0.001cd | 0.62±0.018abc | 0.64±0.013b |
T7 | 0.49±0.006d | 0.23±0.004b | 0.72±0.003b | 0.50±0.001c | 0.02±0.000cde | 0.59±0.004c | 0.57±0.015b |
项目 Item | 第一主因 Primary cause | 第二主因 The second main cause | 第三主因 The third main cause |
---|---|---|---|
株高Plant height | -0.413 | 0.353 | 0.311 9 |
茎粗Stem thickness | -0.057 3 | 0.901 8 | 0.020 9 |
叶面积Leaf area | 0.090 2 | 0.113 9 | 0.937 7 |
出苗率Emergence rate | 0.890 5 | 0.024 4 | 0.018 8 |
根冠比Root shoot ratio | 0.723 8 | 0.399 | -0.353 4 |
壮苗指数Strong seedling index | 0.267 2 | 0.581 2 | -0.726 2 |
Chla+b | 0.935 3 | -0.122 1 | -0.074 2 |
Caros | 0.958 9 | -0.053 8 | 0.091 6 |
Anths | 0.745 3 | 0.566 6 | -0.264 6 |
可溶性糖含量Soluble sugar content | 0.133 | -0.110 9 | -0.023 7 |
可溶性蛋白含量Soluble protein content | 0.143 8 | 0.154 | -0.772 8 |
方差贡献Ariance contribution | 3.958 3 | 1.823 3 | 2.311 2 |
累计贡献Cumulative contribution | 0.359 8 | 0.525 6 | 0.735 7 |
特征值Eigenvalues | 4.808 3 | 2.554 7 | 2.094 3 |
百分率Percentage(%) | 43.712 2 | 23.224 5 | 19.038 7 |
累计百分率Cumulative percentage(%) | 43.712 2 | 66.936 7 | 85.975 4 |
权重Weights | 0.508 4 | 0.270 1 | 0.221 4 |
表8 辣椒幼苗生长及生理指标-方差极大正交旋转后因子载荷矩阵
Tab.8 Growth and physiological indexes of pepper seedlings-factor loading matrix after orthogonal rotation with maximum variance
项目 Item | 第一主因 Primary cause | 第二主因 The second main cause | 第三主因 The third main cause |
---|---|---|---|
株高Plant height | -0.413 | 0.353 | 0.311 9 |
茎粗Stem thickness | -0.057 3 | 0.901 8 | 0.020 9 |
叶面积Leaf area | 0.090 2 | 0.113 9 | 0.937 7 |
出苗率Emergence rate | 0.890 5 | 0.024 4 | 0.018 8 |
根冠比Root shoot ratio | 0.723 8 | 0.399 | -0.353 4 |
壮苗指数Strong seedling index | 0.267 2 | 0.581 2 | -0.726 2 |
Chla+b | 0.935 3 | -0.122 1 | -0.074 2 |
Caros | 0.958 9 | -0.053 8 | 0.091 6 |
Anths | 0.745 3 | 0.566 6 | -0.264 6 |
可溶性糖含量Soluble sugar content | 0.133 | -0.110 9 | -0.023 7 |
可溶性蛋白含量Soluble protein content | 0.143 8 | 0.154 | -0.772 8 |
方差贡献Ariance contribution | 3.958 3 | 1.823 3 | 2.311 2 |
累计贡献Cumulative contribution | 0.359 8 | 0.525 6 | 0.735 7 |
特征值Eigenvalues | 4.808 3 | 2.554 7 | 2.094 3 |
百分率Percentage(%) | 43.712 2 | 23.224 5 | 19.038 7 |
累计百分率Cumulative percentage(%) | 43.712 2 | 66.936 7 | 85.975 4 |
权重Weights | 0.508 4 | 0.270 1 | 0.221 4 |
处理 Treat- ments | 株高 Plant height | 茎粗 Stem thickness | 叶面积 Leaf area | 出苗率 Emergence rate | 根冠比 Root shoot ratio | 壮苗指数 Strong seedling index | Chla+b | 类胡萝卜素 Caros | 花青素 Anths | 可溶性 糖含量 Soluble sugar content | 可溶性 蛋白含量 Soluble protein content | 综合 评价系数 Comprehensive evaluation coefficient | 排序 Sort |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 0.80 | 1 | 0.66 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.73 | 0.94 | 1 | 0.28 | 0.43 | 0.80 | 1 |
T1 | 0 | 0.82 | 0 | 0 | 0.50 | 0.73 | 1 | 1 | 0.67 | 1 | 1 | 0.61 | 2 |
T2 | 1 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 8 |
T3 | 0.54 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 1 | 0 | 0.39 | 0.50 | 0.84 | 0.50 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 0.58 | 3 |
T4 | 0.60 | 0.76 | 0.56 | 0.77 | 0.23 | 0.32 | 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.33 | 0.16 | 0.05 | 0.48 | 7 |
T5 | 0.40 | 0.86 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.39 | 0.47 | 0.33 | 0.75 | 0.57 | 0.52 | 5 |
T6 | 0.32 | 0 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.44 | 0.28 | 0.71 | 0.89 | 0.33 | 0.73 | 0.33 | 0.50 | 6 |
T7 | 0.69 | 0.48 | 1 | 0.85 | 0.21 | 0 | 0.73 | 0.92 | 0.33 | 0.65 | 0 | 0.53 | 4 |
表9 辣椒幼苗生长及生理指标综合评价
Tab.9 Comprehensive evaluation of growth and physiological indexes of pepper seedlings
处理 Treat- ments | 株高 Plant height | 茎粗 Stem thickness | 叶面积 Leaf area | 出苗率 Emergence rate | 根冠比 Root shoot ratio | 壮苗指数 Strong seedling index | Chla+b | 类胡萝卜素 Caros | 花青素 Anths | 可溶性 糖含量 Soluble sugar content | 可溶性 蛋白含量 Soluble protein content | 综合 评价系数 Comprehensive evaluation coefficient | 排序 Sort |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 0.80 | 1 | 0.66 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.73 | 0.94 | 1 | 0.28 | 0.43 | 0.80 | 1 |
T1 | 0 | 0.82 | 0 | 0 | 0.50 | 0.73 | 1 | 1 | 0.67 | 1 | 1 | 0.61 | 2 |
T2 | 1 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 8 |
T3 | 0.54 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 1 | 0 | 0.39 | 0.50 | 0.84 | 0.50 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 0.58 | 3 |
T4 | 0.60 | 0.76 | 0.56 | 0.77 | 0.23 | 0.32 | 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.33 | 0.16 | 0.05 | 0.48 | 7 |
T5 | 0.40 | 0.86 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.39 | 0.47 | 0.33 | 0.75 | 0.57 | 0.52 | 5 |
T6 | 0.32 | 0 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.44 | 0.28 | 0.71 | 0.89 | 0.33 | 0.73 | 0.33 | 0.50 | 6 |
T7 | 0.69 | 0.48 | 1 | 0.85 | 0.21 | 0 | 0.73 | 0.92 | 0.33 | 0.65 | 0 | 0.53 | 4 |
[1] | 王高飞, 邢丹, 牟玉梅, 等. 稻秆/稻壳炭育苗基质对辣椒幼苗生长和氮磷钾养分含量的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2021,(4): 53-56. |
WANG Gaofei, XIN Dan, MOU Yumei, et al. Effect of rice straw/rice husk charcoal seedling substrate on pepper seed-ling growth and nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium nutrients[J]. China Cucurbits and Vegetables, 2021,(4):53-56. | |
[2] | 朱丽, 陈晓东, 乔玉山, 等. 不同配比基质对草莓母苗生长和抽生匍匐茎的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2021,(3): 547-554. |
ZHU Li, CHENG Xiaodong, QIAO Yushan, et al. Effects of Different-Proportion Matrixes on Growth of Strawberry Mother Plants and Runners[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2021,(3):547-554. | |
[3] | 王霞, 郝树芹. 辣椒秸秆复合基质对西瓜育苗质量的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2021,(3): 31-35. |
WANG Xia, HAO Shuqing. Effect of pepper straw composite matrix on watermelon seedling quality[J]. China Cucurbits and Vegetables, 2021,(3):31-35. | |
[4] | 刘燕, 张凯鸣, 孙萍, 等. 添加矿质营养对蚓粪-蛭石育苗基质培育西红柿幼苗的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020,(22): 153-159. |
LIU Yan, ZHANG Kaiming, SUN Ping, et al. Effect of adding mineral nutrients on the cultivation of tomato seedlings on earthworm manure-vermiculite seedling substrate[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2020,(22):153-159. | |
[5] |
王涛, 雷锦桂, 黄语燕, 等. 绣球菌渣复合基质对黄瓜幼苗素质及产量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2020,(1): 177-185.
DOI |
WANG Tao, LEI Jingjia, HUANG Yuyan, et al.. Effect of composite substrate of hydrangea residue on the quality and yield of cucumber seedlings[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2020,(1):177-185. | |
[6] | 王学求, 周建, 迟清华, 等. 中国稀土元素地球化学背景与远景区优选[J]. 地球学报, 2020,(6): 747-758. |
WANG Xueqiu, ZHOU Jian, CHI Qinghua, et al. Geochemical Background and Distribution of Rare Earth Elements in China Implications for Potential Prospects[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2020,(6):747-758. | |
[7] | 杨若鹏, 李爷福, 李杰. 蛭石引发对盐胁迫下番茄种子萌发、幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018,(4): 135-139. |
YANG Ruopeng, LI Yefu, LI Jie. Effect of vermiculite triggering on seed germination, seedling growth and physiological characteristics of tomato under salt stress[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2018,(4):135-139. | |
[8] | 王书英, 何青. 辣椒育苗与移栽技术[J]. 现代农业, 2009,(3): 20. |
WANG Shuyin, HE Qing. Pepper seedling and transplanting technology[J]. Modern Agriculture, 2009,(3):20. | |
[9] | 刘超杰, 郭世荣, 王长义, 等. 混配醋糟复合基质对辣椒幼苗生长的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2010, 37(4): 559-566. |
LIU Chaojie, GUO Shirong, WANG Changyi, et al. Vinegar Residue Substrate as Component of Mixed Substrate for Pepper Seedling Growth[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2010, 37(4):559-566. | |
[10] |
Ghulam A B, Muhammad U, Yasir N, et al. Morphometry of leaf and shoot variables to assess aboveground biomass structure and carbon sequestration by different varieties of white mulberry(Morus alba L.)[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2021, 32(6): 2291-2300.
DOI |
[11] | Pimentel N A, Gazzana D A, Spanevello J F B, et al. Effect of mini-cutting size on adventitious rooting and morphophysiological quality of Ilex paraguariensis plantlets[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2020,(2): 1-8. |
[12] | Liu R, Gu M, Huang L, et al. Effect of pine wood biochar mixed with two types of compost on growth of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)[J]. Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology, 2019, 60(3): 313-319. |
[13] | 张永亮, 续建国, 李灵芝. 菇渣复合基质对番茄幼苗生长的影响[J]. 种子科技, 2016, 34(5): 40-44. |
ZHANG Yongliang, XU Jianguo, LI Lingzhi. Effect of mushroom residue composite substrate on the growth of tomato seedlings[J]. Seed Science & Technology, 2016, 34(5):40-44. | |
[14] | 徐曼, 邓正春, 孙信成, 等. 不同育苗方式对白菜薹幼苗质量的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2021,(10): 11-15. |
XU Man, DENG Zhenchun, SUN Xinchen, et al. Effects of Different Seedling-raising Ways on the Quality of Stalk Chinese Cabbage Seedlings[J]. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 2021,(10):11-15. | |
[15] | Shomali A, Aliniaeifard S, Didaran F, et al. Synergistic Effects of Melatonin and Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid on Protection of Photosynthesis System in Response to Multiple Abiotic Stressors.[J]. Cells, 2021, 10(7). |
[16] | Sui X, Zhang Z, Zhang B, et al. [Photosynthetic and growth characteristics of different ecotype capsicum under weak light[J]. The Journal of Applied Ecology, 2006, 17(10). |
[17] | 郭世荣. 无土栽培学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2011. |
GUO Shirong. Soilless Culture Science[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2011. | |
[18] | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. |
BAO Shidan. Soilless Culture Science[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000. | |
[19] |
董环, 娄春荣, 张青, 等. 调节草炭pH值对其有效养分和番茄、辣椒幼苗生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(7): 55-62.
DOI |
DONG Huan, LOU Chunrong, ZHANG Qin, et al. Regulation of Peat pH Value: Effect on Its Available Nutrients,and Seedling Growth of Tomato and Hot Pepper[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(55):55-62. | |
[20] | 王立革, 孙晓姝, 王媛, 等. 秸秆还田及钾肥减量对设施黄瓜钾钙镁含量和土壤钾形态的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2021, 49(4): 461-466. |
WANG Lige, SUN Xiaozhu, WANG Yan, et al. Effect of straw return and potassium fertilizer reduction on potassium, calcium and magnesium content and soil potassium morphology of cucumber in facilities[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 49(4):461-466. | |
[21] |
高玉秋, 徐彩龙, 马立晖, 等. 鄂伦春旗耕地土壤有机质含量的时空变化趋势及其与大豆产量的关系[J]. 农学学报, 2021, 11(2): 57-63.
DOI |
GAO Yuqiu, XU Cailong, MA Lihui, et al. Temporal-Spatial Distribution of Arable Soil Organic Matter in Oroqen Banner and Its Relationship with Soybean Yield[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(2):57-63.
DOI |
|
[22] |
高玉秋, 徐彩龙, 马立晖, 等. 鄂伦春旗耕地土壤有机质含量的时空变化趋势及其与大豆产量的关系[J]. 农学学报, 2021, 11(2): 57-63.
DOI |
GAO Yuqiu, XU Cailong, MA Lihui, et al. Temporal-Spatial Distribution of Arable Soil Organic Matter in Oroqen Banner and Its Relationship with Soybean Yield[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(2):57-63.
DOI |
|
[23] | 高赟, 马慧萍. 不同光质组合对西葫芦幼苗光合及生长特性的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2021,(20): 42-47. |
GAO Bin, MA Huiping. Effect of different light quality combinations on photosynthetic and growth characteristics of zucchini seedlings[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2021,(20):42-47. | |
[24] | 高俊凤. 植物生理学试验指导[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006. |
GAO Junfen. Plant Physiology Test Guide[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006. | |
[25] | 葛建坤, 辛清聪, 龚雪文, 等. 温室通风控水条件对番茄耗水特性及产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(15): 204-213. |
GE Jiankun, XIN Qingcong, LONG Xuewen, et al. Effect of greenhouse ventilation and water control conditions on water consumption characteristics and yield of tomato[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2021, 37(15):204-213. | |
[26] | 刘庆超. 三种重要盆栽花卉的有机代用基质研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2006. |
LIU Qingchao. Research on organic substitute substrates for three important potted flowers[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2006. | |
[27] | 吴志行, 凌丽娟, 张义平. 蔬菜无土育苗基质选用理论与技术的研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 1988,(3): 20-27. |
WU Zhixin, LING Lijuan, ZHANG Yiping. Research on the theory and technology of vegetable soilless seedling substrate selection[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 1988,(3):20-27. | |
[28] | 张豪强, 朱永华, 吕海深. 淮北平原夏玉米生长与土壤含水量和地下水的关系[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2021, 49(5): 79-84. |
ZHANG Haoqiang, ZHU Yonghua, LV Haisheng. Relationship between summer maize growth and soil water content and groundwater in the Huabei Plain[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 49(5):79-84. |
[1] | 鞠乐, 齐军仓, 陈培育, 牛银亭, 阴志刚. 干旱胁迫对大麦种子萌发、幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1879-1886. |
[2] | 魏迎凤, 张全成, 查慧, 王小丽, 王俊刚. 二甲戊灵对龙葵苗期主要生长发育和生理指标的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 2013-2021. |
[3] | 江柱, 张江辉, 白云岗, 杨鹏年, 刘洪波, 肖军, 刘旭辉. 膜下咸水滴灌水肥盐调控对棉花生长及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1389-1397. |
[4] | 王冠玉, 贾平平, 靳娟, 阿布都卡尤木·阿依麦提, 樊丁宇, 赵晓梅, 郝庆, 杨磊, 耿文娟. 高温胁迫对枣花器官生理特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1485-1491. |
[5] | 陈艳, 黄璐瑶, 邓昌蓉, 张彦君, 侯全刚, 邵登魁. 冷害对多茸毛型线辣椒幼苗生理水平的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1492-1498. |
[6] | 袁雷, 唐亚萍, 张国儒, 吉雪花, 杨生保. 基于辣椒种间杂交F2群体的遗传连锁图谱构建及主要果实性状QTL定位[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1150-1161. |
[7] | 田敬宇, 高雁, 高兴旺, 曾军, 赵鹏安, 苏比努尔·居来提. 哈密瓜种植对根际土壤细菌群落组成和多样性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1253-1262. |
[8] | 程利华, 杨红兰, 马清倩, 史莹, 张大伟, Alisher A. Abdullaev, 张道远. 陆地棉种质黄萎病抗性生理鉴定分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 992-1002. |
[9] | 裴红霞, 李生梅, 武旭霞, 耿世伟, 赖黎丽, 高晶霞, 董心久. 辣椒核雄性不育系pby-1形态学及生理生化特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(3): 624-632. |
[10] | 尤厚美, 杜佳, 罗勇, 张祥坤, 朱宝林, 田维亮. 蛭石基培养基质育苗性能的评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(2): 399-406. |
[11] | 杨志毅, 王惠林, 王瑞, 王超楠, 徐宝林, 邱火箭. 六种铜制剂对主要甜瓜生长指标、产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 3008-3017. |
[12] | 姚庆, 施俊杰, 侯献飞, 贾东海, 顾元国, 阿里别里根·哈孜太, 苗昊翠, 李强. 42份匍匐型花生幼苗对盐胁迫的生理响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2442-2452. |
[13] | 肖中林, 闫会转, 高杰, 王思逸, 张旭旭, 艾力西热·尼加提. 不同浓度NaCl和NaHCO3胁迫对制干辣椒光合特性日变化的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 140-149. |
[14] | 李安, 候玉勇, 周岭. 菌糠对猪粪好氧堆肥的腐熟度指标影响及评价分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 242-251. |
[15] | 彭宇, 闫会转, 肖中林, 贾凯, 燕存尧, 王妍欣. 不同施肥处理对盆栽辣椒土壤酶活性及土壤微生物含量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(9): 2200-2208. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||