新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (12): 3041-3048.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.12.020
刘旭坤1,2(), 阿尔孜姑丽·肉孜2, 朱晓峰2, 吐尔逊·阿合买提2, 赵雯慧1,2, 付开赟2, 丁新华2, 贾尊尊2, 阿地力·沙塔尔1(), 郭文超2()
收稿日期:
2023-04-22
出版日期:
2023-12-20
发布日期:
2024-01-03
通信作者:
阿地力·沙塔尔(1968-),男,新疆人,教授,博士,硕士生/博士生导师,研究方向为农业害虫综合防治,(E-mail)adl1968@126.com;郭文超(1966-),男,河北人,研究员,博士,硕士生/博士生导师,研究方向为农业害虫综合防治,(E-mail)gwc1966@163.com
作者简介:
刘旭坤(2000-),男,河南南阳人,硕士研究生,研究方向为森林保护,(E-mail)2416933575@qq.com
基金资助:
LIU Xukun1,2(), Aerziguli Rouzi2, ZHU Xiaofeng2, Tuerxun Ahemaiti2, ZHAO Wenhui1,2, FU Kaiyun2, DING Xinhua2, JIA Zunzun2, Adili Shataer1(), GUO Wenchao2()
Received:
2023-04-22
Online:
2023-12-20
Published:
2024-01-03
Correspondence author:
Adili Shataer (1968-), male, Xinjiang, Ph.D., professor, Integrated pest control in agriculture,(E-mail)Supported by:
摘要:
【目的】筛选出新疆阿克苏地区桃小食心虫Carposina sasakii Matsmura防控效果最佳的迷向装置,提出适宜当地基于昆虫性信息素迷向干扰的防治技术。【方法】定点监测桃小食心虫成虫发生动态,设计在枣园选择距地面3.5与2 m处悬挂迷向丝、迷向管以及缓释迷向袋等不同类型迷向装置,监测并计算其迷向率与蛀果率,筛选适宜高效迷向装置和悬挂高度。【结果】迷向丝、迷向管和缓释迷向袋悬挂高度2与3.5 m蛀果减退率分别为77.36%和90.00%、98.42%和93.15%、93.69%和94.21%;不同迷向装置悬挂高度2与3.5 m,平均迷向率分别为94.81%和89.38%。三种迷向装置防治效果存在明显差异。迷向管控制效果最优,其次为缓释迷向袋的防治效果,迷向丝的防治效果相对较低。不同迷向装置在悬挂高度3.5 m的防治效果优于悬挂高度2 m的防治效果。【结论】在枣园采用每667m2有效成分为顺-7-二十碳烯-11-酮的三种装置中,控制有效成分含量3 g/667m2,配置迷向丝40个/667m2、迷向管20个/667m2和缓施迷向袋6个/667m2均有较好的防效。生产中可使用迷向管和缓释迷向袋用于防治桃小食心虫。
中图分类号:
刘旭坤, 阿尔孜姑丽·肉孜, 朱晓峰, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 赵雯慧, 付开赟, 丁新华, 贾尊尊, 阿地力·沙塔尔, 郭文超. 三种迷向装置对桃小食心虫的防治效果[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 3041-3048.
LIU Xukun, Aerziguli Rouzi, ZHU Xiaofeng, Tuerxun Ahemaiti, ZHAO Wenhui, FU Kaiyun, DING Xinhua, JIA Zunzun, Adili Shataer, GUO Wenchao. The control effect of three kinds of fan devices on Carposina sasakii Matsmura[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(12): 3041-3048.
名称 Name | 载体 Carrier | 长度 Length (mm) | 外径 Outside diameter (mm) | 壁厚 thickness (mm) | 活性组分含量 Active ingredient content(g) | 持效期 Shelf life(d) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
迷向丝 Fascinated by silk | 复合聚乙烯 | 200±5 | 2.7±0.2 | 0.7±0.1 | 0.075 | 120 |
迷向管 Confusion tube | PVC塑料管 | 300±5 | 2.3±0.2 | 1.5±0.2 | 0.150 | 120 |
缓释迷向袋 Slow-release puzzle pouch | 聚乙烯缓释袋 | 70×150 | - | - | 0.500 | 120 |
三角形诱捕器 Triangle trap | 钙塑板 | 265±2 | 200±2 | 110±2 | - | - |
白色粘虫板 White sticky worm plate | 230±2 | 190±2 | - | - | - |
表1 试验材料
Tab.1 Experimental materials
名称 Name | 载体 Carrier | 长度 Length (mm) | 外径 Outside diameter (mm) | 壁厚 thickness (mm) | 活性组分含量 Active ingredient content(g) | 持效期 Shelf life(d) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
迷向丝 Fascinated by silk | 复合聚乙烯 | 200±5 | 2.7±0.2 | 0.7±0.1 | 0.075 | 120 |
迷向管 Confusion tube | PVC塑料管 | 300±5 | 2.3±0.2 | 1.5±0.2 | 0.150 | 120 |
缓释迷向袋 Slow-release puzzle pouch | 聚乙烯缓释袋 | 70×150 | - | - | 0.500 | 120 |
三角形诱捕器 Triangle trap | 钙塑板 | 265±2 | 200±2 | 110±2 | - | - |
白色粘虫板 White sticky worm plate | 230±2 | 190±2 | - | - | - |
试验区 Plot | 桃小食心虫 Carposinasasakiii | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
迷向剂 Vacuum | 高度 Height (m) | 主要成分含量 The main ingredient content (g/667m2) | 数量 Quantity (个) | |
A | 迷向丝 | 2.0 | 3 | 40 |
B | 迷向丝 | 3.5 | 3 | 40 |
C | 迷向管 | 2.0 | 3 | 20 |
D | 迷向管 | 3.5 | 3 | 20 |
E | 缓释迷向袋 | 2.0 | 3 | 6 |
F | 缓释迷向袋 | 3.5 | 3 | 6 |
CK | - | - | - | - |
表2 试验区概况
Tab.2 Overview of the test area
试验区 Plot | 桃小食心虫 Carposinasasakiii | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
迷向剂 Vacuum | 高度 Height (m) | 主要成分含量 The main ingredient content (g/667m2) | 数量 Quantity (个) | |
A | 迷向丝 | 2.0 | 3 | 40 |
B | 迷向丝 | 3.5 | 3 | 40 |
C | 迷向管 | 2.0 | 3 | 20 |
D | 迷向管 | 3.5 | 3 | 20 |
E | 缓释迷向袋 | 2.0 | 3 | 6 |
F | 缓释迷向袋 | 3.5 | 3 | 6 |
CK | - | - | - | - |
试验区 Plot | 总诱蛾量 (头) Total amount of moths (head) | 迷向率 Percentage of isotropy (%) |
---|---|---|
A(迷向丝2 m fascinated by silk 2 m) | 5 | 99.82 |
B(迷向丝3.5 m fascinated by silk 3.5 m) | 0 | 100.00 |
C(迷向管2 m confusion tube 2 m) | 0 | 100.00 |
D(迷向管3.5 m confusion tube 3.5 m) | 0 | 100.00 |
E(缓释迷向袋2 m slow-release puzzle pouch 2 m) | 17 | 95.99 |
F(缓释迷向袋3.5 m slow-release puzzle pouch 3.5 m) | 45 | 89.38 |
CK | 424 | - |
表3 不同处理区总诱蛾量
Tab.3 Statistics on total trapping in different treatment areas
试验区 Plot | 总诱蛾量 (头) Total amount of moths (head) | 迷向率 Percentage of isotropy (%) |
---|---|---|
A(迷向丝2 m fascinated by silk 2 m) | 5 | 99.82 |
B(迷向丝3.5 m fascinated by silk 3.5 m) | 0 | 100.00 |
C(迷向管2 m confusion tube 2 m) | 0 | 100.00 |
D(迷向管3.5 m confusion tube 3.5 m) | 0 | 100.00 |
E(缓释迷向袋2 m slow-release puzzle pouch 2 m) | 17 | 95.99 |
F(缓释迷向袋3.5 m slow-release puzzle pouch 3.5 m) | 45 | 89.38 |
CK | 424 | - |
试验区 Plot (m) | 总诱蛾量 Total trap catch (头) | 平均诱蛾量 Average amount of moths (头) | 迷向率 Percentage of isotropy (%) |
---|---|---|---|
悬挂高度2 Suspensionheight 2 | 22 | 1.46 | 94.81 |
悬挂高度3.5 Suspension height 3.5 | 45 | 3 | 89.38 |
对照区CK Control plot | 424 | 84.8 | — |
表4 不同悬挂高度处理区总诱蛾量
Tab.4 Statistics of total trapping in treatment areas by suspension height
试验区 Plot (m) | 总诱蛾量 Total trap catch (头) | 平均诱蛾量 Average amount of moths (头) | 迷向率 Percentage of isotropy (%) |
---|---|---|---|
悬挂高度2 Suspensionheight 2 | 22 | 1.46 | 94.81 |
悬挂高度3.5 Suspension height 3.5 | 45 | 3 | 89.38 |
对照区CK Control plot | 424 | 84.8 | — |
图2 不同迷向装置不同高度下诱蛾迷向率对比 注:A表示为迷向丝悬挂2 m、B表示为迷向丝悬挂3.5 m、C表示为迷向管悬挂2 m、D表示为迷向管悬挂3.5 m、E表示为缓释迷向袋悬挂2 m、F表示为缓释迷向袋悬挂3.5 m; P<0.05水平差异显著(单因素方差分析)
Fig.2 Comparison of the brawl rate of moths at different heights of different vandal devices Note: A indicates fascinated by silk suspension 2 m, B indicates fascinated by silk suspension 3.5 m, C indicates confusion tube suspension 2 m, D indicates confusion tube suspension 3.5 m, E indicates slow-release puzzle pouch suspension 2 m, F indicates slow-release puzzle pouch suspension 3.5 m; Significant difference in P<0.05 levels (one-way ANOVA)
图3 桃小食心虫成虫发生动态与不同高度诱蛾迷向率对比
Fig.3 Comparison of the occurrence dynamics of adult peach heartworms with the fugitive rates of moths at different heights
试验区 Plot | 调查总果数 Total fruit (个) | 虫果数 Wormy fruit (个) | 蛀果率 Fruit borer rate (%) | 蛀果减退率 Fruit borer reduction rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
A(迷向丝2 m)A (fascinated by silk 2 m) | 1 000 | 43 | 4.3b | 77.36 |
B(迷向丝3.5 m)B (fascinated by silk 3.5 m) | 1 000 | 19 | 1.9c | 90.00 |
C(迷向管2 m)C (confusion tube 2 m) | 1 000 | 3 | 0.3d | 98.42 |
D(迷向管3.5 m)D (confusion tube 3.5 m) | 1 000 | 13 | 1.3c | 93.15 |
E(缓释迷向袋2 m)E (slow-release puzzle pouch 2 m) | 1 000 | 12 | 1.2c | 93.69 |
F(缓释迷向袋3.5 m)F (slow-release puzzle pouch 3.5 m) | 1 000 | 11 | 1.1c | 94.21 |
CK | 1 000 | 190 | 19a | - |
表5 果实成熟期蛀果率变化
Tab.5 Fruit decay rate survey results
试验区 Plot | 调查总果数 Total fruit (个) | 虫果数 Wormy fruit (个) | 蛀果率 Fruit borer rate (%) | 蛀果减退率 Fruit borer reduction rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
A(迷向丝2 m)A (fascinated by silk 2 m) | 1 000 | 43 | 4.3b | 77.36 |
B(迷向丝3.5 m)B (fascinated by silk 3.5 m) | 1 000 | 19 | 1.9c | 90.00 |
C(迷向管2 m)C (confusion tube 2 m) | 1 000 | 3 | 0.3d | 98.42 |
D(迷向管3.5 m)D (confusion tube 3.5 m) | 1 000 | 13 | 1.3c | 93.15 |
E(缓释迷向袋2 m)E (slow-release puzzle pouch 2 m) | 1 000 | 12 | 1.2c | 93.69 |
F(缓释迷向袋3.5 m)F (slow-release puzzle pouch 3.5 m) | 1 000 | 11 | 1.1c | 94.21 |
CK | 1 000 | 190 | 19a | - |
[1] | 赵飞, 王慧. 桃小食心虫生物生态学研究进[J]. 山西农业科学, 2010, 38(5):36-38. |
ZHAO Fei, WANG Hui. Research on the Bioecology of Peach Heartworm[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 38(5):36-38. | |
[2] | 孙天文, 郭艳春. 河南省苹果食心虫发生情况简报[J]. 河南农业科学, 1991, (1):23-25. |
SUN Tianwei, GUO Yanchun. Brief report on the occurrence of apple heartworm in Henan Province[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 1991,(1):23-25. | |
[3] | 熊彩珍, 李洁, 范全根. 梨小食心虫发生期预测与防治[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2017, 45(16):147-148. |
XIONG Caizhen, LI Jie, FAN Quangen. Prediction and control of the occurrence period of pear heartworm[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45(16):147-148. | |
[4] | 杜恩强, 庾琴, 封云涛, 等. 5种农药对梨小食心虫成虫杀灭及产卵抑制作用[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2019, 39(1):57-60. |
DU Enqiang, YU Qin, FENG Yuntao, et al. Effect of five pesticides on adult killing and spawning inhibition of pear heartworm[J]. China Plant Protection Herald, 2019, 39(1):57-60. | |
[5] | 公义, 孙淑建, 肖云丽, 等. 性迷向素迷向法防治梨园梨小食心虫试验效果[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(10):109-111. |
GONG Yi, SUN Shujian, XIAO Yunli, et al. Experimental effect of sexual myxin fascination method on the control of pear heartworm in pear garden[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(10):109-111. | |
[6] |
McDonough L M, Aller W C, Knight A L. Performance char-acteristics of a commercial controlled release dispenser of sex pheromone for control of codling moth (Cydia pomonella) by mating disruption[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1992, 18(12):2177-2189.
DOI PMID |
[7] | Witzgall P, Stelinski L L, Gut L j, et al. Codling moth man-agement and chemical ecology[J]. Annual Review of Entomol-ogy, 2008, 53: 503-522(5):12-15. |
[8] | 李晓龙, 贾永华, 窦云萍, 等. 性信息素迷向丝对不同果树梨小食心虫的防控效果[J]. 植物保护, 2019, 45(1):212-215. |
LI Xiaolong, JIA Yonghua, DOU Yunping, et al. Prevention and control effect of sexual pheromonic fascination silk on small heartworm pears in different fruit trees[J]. Plant Protection, 2019, 45(1):212-215. | |
[9] |
李兴龙, 张馨月, 雷岳杰, 等. 石河子垦区果树食心虫迷向技术[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(1):173-180.
DOI |
LI Xinglong, ZHANG Xinyue, LEI Yuejie, et al. Lost Technique of Heartworm in Fruit Trees in Shihezi Reclamation Area[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(1):173-180.
DOI |
|
[10] | 涂洪涛, 张金勇, 陈汉杰, 等. 应用性信息素缓释剂迷向防治桃树梨小食心虫研究[J]. 果树学报, 2012, 29(2):286-290. |
TU Hongtao, ZHANG Jinlong, CHEN Hanjie, et al. Study on the control of peach pear small heartworm by applied pheromone sustained release agent[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2012, 29(2):286-290. | |
[11] | 翟浩, 张勇, 李晓军, 等. 性迷向素胶条结合化学药剂规模化防控晚熟梨园梨小食心虫[J]. 果树学报, 2018, 35(S):148-154. |
ZHAI Hao, ZHANG Yong, LI Xiaojun, et al. Large-scale prevention and control of late-ripening pear garden pear heartworm on a large-scale basis by combining chemical agents of sexual myxine glue strips[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2018, 35(S):148-154. | |
[12] | 王玉兰, 唐丽, 岳朝阳, 等. 性诱剂不同悬挂高度及田间风向对梨小食心虫诱集效果的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2011, 48(7):1283-1286. |
WANG Yulan, TANG Li, YUE Chaoyang, et al. Effects of different suspension heights and field wind direction of sexual attractants on the induction effect of pear small heartworm[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 48(7):1283-1286. | |
[13] | 康总江, 宫亚军, 朱亮, 等. 三种不同材质小菜蛾性诱剂诱芯田间诱蛾效果比较[J]. 北方园艺, 2011,(6):155-156. |
KANG Zongjiang, GONG Yajun, ZHU Liang, et al. Comparison of field moth lure effects of three different materials of small cabbage moth sexual attractant to lure moth[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2011,(6):155-156. | |
[14] | 王安柱, 李东鸿, 梁婷婷, 等. 3种性诱剂诱捕器对桃园梨小食心虫诱捕试验[J]. 西北农业学报, 2010, 21(11):203-206. |
WANG Anzhu, LI Donghong, LIANG Tingting, et al. Trapping test of three kinds of sexual attractant traps on small heartworms in Taoyuan pear[J]. Northwest Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 21(11):203-206. | |
[15] | 涂洪涛, 张金勇, 陈汉杰, 等. 应用性信息素缓释剂迷向防治桃树梨小食心虫研究[J]. 果树学报, 2012, 29(2):286-290. |
TU Hongtao, ZHANG Jinyong, CHEN Hanjie, et al. Study on the control of peach pear small heartworm by applied pheromone sustained release agent[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2012, 29(2):286-290. | |
[16] |
Witzgall P, Kirsch I P, Cork A. Sex pheromones and their impact on pest management[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2010, 36(1):80-100.
DOI PMID |
[17] | 李晓龙, 夏国宁, 何建川, 等. 复合式膏体迷向剂对梨小、桃小食心虫的防控效果[J]. 植物保护, 2013, 39(6):147-152. |
LI Xiaolong, XIA Guoning, HE Jianchuan, et al. Control effects of a dual sex pheromone cream on the oriental fruit moth and peach fruit moth in apple orchards[J]. Plant Protection, 2013, 39(6):147-152. | |
[18] | 朱虹昱, 刘伟, 崔艮中, 等. 苹果蠹蛾迷向防治技术效果初报[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2012, 49(1):121-129. |
ZHU Hongyu, LIU Wei, CUI Genzhong, et al. A preliminary report on the effect of the control technology of apple beetle moth[J]. Acta Applied Entomological Sinica, 2012, 49(1):121-129. | |
[19] | 翟小伟, 刘万学, 张桂芬, 等. 苹果蠹蛾性信息素的研究和应用进展[J]. 昆虫学报, 2009, 52(8):907-916. |
ZHAI Xiaowei, LIU Wanxue, ZHANG Guifen, et al. Research and application progress of pheromones in apple beetle moth[J]. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 2009, 52(8):907-916. | |
[20] | 尹河龙, 刘贤谦, 马瑞燕, 等. 应用性信息素迷向法防治桃小食心虫[J]. 林业实用技术, 2009,(1):33-34. |
YIN Helong, LIU Xianqian, MA Ruiyan, et al. Applied pheromone vague method for the control of peach heartworms[J]. Forestry Practical Technology, 2009,(1):33-34. | |
[21] | 李霞, 李先伟, 赵志国, 等. 桃小食心虫性诱芯合理有效使用方法的研究[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 31(3):213-216. |
LI Xia, LI Xianwei, ZHAO Zhiguo, et al. Study on rational and effective use of peach heartworm sexual inducement core[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2011, 31(3):213-216. | |
[22] | 毛尼亚孜·依马木, 崔燕华, 张新浩, 等. 阿克苏红枣上桃小食心虫的发生及防治技术[J]. 农村科技, 2017,(2):49-50. |
Maoniyazi yimamu, CUI Yanhua, ZHANG Xinhao, et al. Occurrence and control technology of peach heartworm on Aksu jujube[J]. Journal of Rural Science and Technology, 2017,(2):49-50. | |
[23] | 牛永浩, 首鹏云, 郭彦君, 等. 迷向法在不同果园防治梨小食心虫效果分析[J]. 山西农业科学, 2021, 49(11):1336-1339. |
NIU Yonghao, SHOU Pengyun, GUO Yanjun, et al. Effect analysis of the control of pear heartworm in different orchards by the lost method[J]. Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 49(11):1336-1339. | |
[24] | 侯晶东, 马利奋. 宁夏中宁枣园桃小食心虫的发生与迷向防控效果[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2019, 60(12):55-56,58. |
HOU Jingdong, MA Lifen. Occurrence and Effect of Peach Heartworm in Zhongning Jujube Garden, Ningxia[J]. Ningxia Agriculture and Forestry Science and Technology, 2019, 60(12):55-56,58. | |
[25] | 陆佳, 蔡鹏, 倪伶俐, 等. pH敏感性聚甲基丙烯酸二乙基氨基乙酯微球的制备及其缓释性能研究[C]// 第三届中国国际复合材料科技大会摘要集-分会场 11-15, 2017:65. |
LU Jia, CAI Peng, NI LingLi, et al. Preparation and sustained release performance of pH-sensitive polyethylaminoethyl methacrylate microspheres[C]// Summary of the 3rd China International Conference on Composites Science and Technology-Sub-Venue 11-15, 2017:65. | |
[26] | 孙丽娜, 张怀江, 阎文涛, 等. 桃小食心虫研究进展[J]. 中国果树, 2018,(1):76-81. |
SUN Lina, ZHANG Huaijiang, YAN Wentao, et al. Research progress of peach heartworm[J]. China Fruit Trees, 2018,(1):76-81. |
[1] | 王朋, 郑凯, 赵杰银, 高文举, 龙遗磊, 陈全家, 曲延英. 陆地棉种质资源材料的耐热性评价及指标筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2081-2090. |
[2] | 刘玉芳, 张志刚, 李长城, 李宏, 程平, 杨璐. 不同温度和成熟度对杏贮藏期腐烂率和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2189-2197. |
[3] | 宋冰梅, 姜岩, 陈鑫, 张宇, 程宛楠, 潘洪生. 新型转基因高产棉花萌发期和苗期耐盐性与耐碱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2239-2247. |
[4] | 曲可佳, 时晓磊, 张恒, 王兴州, 耿洪伟, 丁孙磊, 张金波, 严勇亮. PEG处理下引进春小麦品种苗期抗旱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1363-1371. |
[5] | 宋单波, 张国新, 王权, 刘保军, 黄涛, 韩宏伟, 白剑宇, 郭庆元. 巴旦木细菌性穿孔病菌的生物学特性及抑菌药剂筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1515-1522. |
[6] | 张燕红, 侯天钰, 巴音花, 赵彩月, 吕玉平, 布哈丽且木·阿不力孜, 赵志强, 李冬, 杜孝敬, 袁杰, 王奉斌. 水稻重组自交系群体芽期和苗期耐盐性鉴定与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1041-1049. |
[7] | 哈力旦·依克热木, 刘娜, 刘联正, 周安定, 姜奇彦, 达买力江·合孜尔, 曹俊梅, 张新忠. 小麦近缘种芽期和苗期的耐盐性鉴定与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1118-1126. |
[8] | 姚庆, 阿里别里根·哈孜太, 杨明花, 李强, 苗昊翠, 崔宏亮. 藜麦种子对萌发温度的响应及低温胁迫萌发能力鉴定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1141-1149. |
[9] | 杨明花, 刘强, 廖必勇, 彭云承, 布阿依夏木·那曼提, 达吾来·杰克山. 不完全双列杂交玉米组合抗倒伏综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 832-840. |
[10] | 赵斌荣, 田晓曦, 柴军发, 景亮亮, 张红艳, 洪波, 贾彦霞. 西蓝花田桃蚜的室内药剂筛选及田间药效评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(3): 547-554. |
[11] | 侯良忠, 郭同军, 张俊瑜, 苏玲玲, 古再丽努尔·艾麦提, 温小燕, 朱晓芳, 杨建中, 王文奇. 不同比例籽用西葫芦皮瓤与玉米秸秆混贮效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(3): 567-573. |
[12] | 马旭, 赵英, 韩炜, 武胜利, 韩晓燕. 14种沙棘果实中氨基酸组成的主成分分析与综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(2): 378-388. |
[13] | 龙天宇, 邓亚辉, 祖倩丽, 杨龙, 曲延英, 陈全家. 棉花枯萎病室内苗期抗病性鉴定方法及评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(2): 416-423. |
[14] | 赵雯慧, 刘旭坤, 阿尔孜姑丽·肉孜, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 付开赟, 丁新华, 贾尊尊, 阿地力·沙塔尔, 郭文超. 不同类型和密度的诱捕器对桃小食心虫诱捕效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 3025-3031. |
[15] | 马辉, 戴路, 李星星, 阿布都艾尼·阿布都维力, 艾麦尔江·阿布力提甫, 田立文, 欧欢. 不同化学药剂处理对长绒棉封顶效果的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(11): 2601-2608. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||