基于养分专家系统的棉花推荐施肥效应

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.12.007

新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (12): 2911-2920.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.12.007

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学·土壤肥料 • 上一篇下一篇

基于养分专家系统的棉花推荐施肥效应

佘玲艺¹^,²(), 哈丽哈什·依巴提²^,³, 张炎²^,³(), 陈创洲¹^,², 樊林鑫¹^,², 张优¹^,²

1.新疆农业大学资源与环境学院,乌鲁木齐 830052
2.新疆农业科学院土壤肥料与农业节水研究所,乌鲁木齐 830091
3.农业农村部荒漠绿洲作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830091

收稿日期:2023-04-28 出版日期:2023-12-20 发布日期:2024-01-03
通信作者: 张炎(1965-),女,天津人,研究员,硕士生导师,研究方向为土壤与植物营养和施肥,(E-mail)yanzhangxj@163.com
作者简介:佘玲艺(1996-),女,湖南长沙人,硕士研究生,研究方向为棉花养分高效管理,(E-mail)527154214@qq.com
基金资助:
新疆维吾尔自治区重大科技专项(2020A01002-3);农田智慧施肥项目(05);农业农村部荒漠绿洲作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室开放课题(25107020-202104)

Effect of recommended fertilization on cotton based on nutrient expert system

SHE Lingyi¹^,²(), Halihashi Yibati²^,³, ZHANG Yan²^,³(), CHEN Chuangzhou¹^,², FAN Linxin¹^,², ZHANG You¹^,²

1. School of Resources and Environment, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
2. Institute of Soil Fertilizer and Agricultural Water Conservation, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China
3. Key Laboratory of Desert-Oasis Crop Physiology,Ecology and Tillage, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Urumqi 830091, China

Received:2023-04-28 Online:2023-12-20 Published:2024-01-03
Correspondence author: ZHANG Yan(1965-), Female, Tianjin, researcher, master 's supervisor, research direction is soil and plant nutrition and fertilization technology,(E-mail)yanzhangxj@163.com
Supported by:
Major S & T Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(2020A01002-3);Smart Fertilization Project for Farmland(05);Open Project of Key Laboratory of Desert-Oasis Crop Physiology,Ecology and Cultivation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, P. R. China(25107020-202104)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究棉花养分推荐施肥专家系统在新疆南疆棉花生产中应用的可行性。【方法】2021年在新疆沙雅县的海楼村和库木巴格村进行田间试验。共设8个处理:NE,基于养分专家系统的推荐施肥配比;NE+OM,养分专家系统推荐施肥基础上,施用有机肥代替部分化肥;FP,常规习惯施肥;OPTS,当地农技推广部门推荐施肥;CK,不施肥;NE-N,NE推荐基础上不施氮肥;NE-P,NE推荐基础上不施磷肥;NE-K,NE推荐基础上不施钾肥。【结果】棉花养分专家系统推荐施肥能显著提高籽棉产量、提升经济效益。海楼村和库木巴格村NE较FP增产10.2%和7.95%,产投比提高10.9和8.7;较OPTS增产11.66%和10.13%;产投比提高17.6和11.9。棉花养分专家系统推荐施肥配比也能显著提高棉花养分吸收和肥料利用率,其中海楼NE的氮、磷、钾养分吸收较FP提高10.33%、3.67%、11.79%,较OPTS提高5.63%、3.62%、17.21%。海楼村和库木巴格村NE的氮、磷、钾肥料利用率较FP提高14.83、18.47、36.83和23.82、18.30、79.91个百分点;较OPTS提高23.99、5.83、33.39和29.35、16.42、64.04个百分点。【结论】棉花养分推荐施肥专家系统平衡了氮、磷、钾肥的施肥配比,在保证产量的同时,有效提高了棉花的养分吸收、肥料利用率和经济效益。棉花养分专家系统推荐施肥在新疆沙雅县的应用是可行的。

关键词: 养分专家系统; 推荐施肥; 棉花; 产量; 表观利用率

Abstract:

【Objective】In order to explore the feasibility of the application of cotton nutrient expert system recommended fertilization in cotton production in southern Xinjiang.【Methods】Field experiments were carried out in Hailou Village and Kumubag Village of Shaya County in 2021. Eight treatments were set up in the experiment: NE, recommended fertilization based on nutrient expert system; NE+OM, nutrient expert system recommended fertilization based on the application of organic fertilizer instead of some chemical fertilizers; FP, farmers' habitual fertilization; OPTS, local agricultural extension department recommended fertilization; CK, no fertilization; NE-N, recommended by NE on the basis of no nitrogen fertilizer; NE-P, recommended by NE on the basis of no phosphate fertilizer; NE recommended by NE-K on the basis of no potassium fertilizer.【Results】The recommended fertilization of cotton nutrient expert system could significantly increase seed cotton yield and improve economic benefits. Compared with FP, Hailou and Kumubag NE increased yield by 10.2% and 7.95%, and the output-input ratio increased by 10.9 and 8.7. The yield increased by 11.66% and 10.13% compared with OPTS. The output-input ratio increased by 17.6 and 11.9. The recommended fertilization of cotton nutrient expert system could also significantly improve the nutrient absorption and fertilizer utilization rate of cotton. The nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium nutrient absorption of Hailou NE was 10.33%, 3.67% and 11.79% higher than that of FP, and 5.63%, 3.62% and 17.21% higher than that of OPTS. The nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer use efficiency of Hailou and Kumubag NE increased by 14.83, 18.47, 36.83 and 23.82, 18.30, 79.91 percentage points compared with FP, and 23.99, 5.83, 33.39 and 29.35, 16.42, 64.04 percentage points higher than OPTS.【Conclusion】Fertilization recommended by cotton nutrient expert system balanced the fertilization ratio of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer, and effectively improved the nutrient uptake, fertilizer use efficiency and economic benefits of cotton while ensuring the yield. Therefore, the application of cotton nutrient expert system recommended fertilization in Xinjiang Shaya County is feasible.

Key words: nutrient expert system; recommended fertilization; cotton; yield; apparent use efficiency

中图分类号:

S562
S15

佘玲艺, 哈丽哈什·依巴提, 张炎, 陈创洲, 樊林鑫, 张优. 基于养分专家系统的棉花推荐施肥效应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 2911-2920.

SHE Lingyi, Halihashi Yibati, ZHANG Yan, CHEN Chuangzhou, FAN Linxin, ZHANG You. Effect of recommended fertilization on cotton based on nutrient expert system[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(12): 2911-2920.

图/表 6

参考文献 31

[1]	2021年全国棉花产量小幅下降[N]. 中国信息报.2021-12-15(02).
	National cotton production declined slightly in 2021[N]. China News, 2021-12-15(02).
[2]	国家统计局关于2021年棉花产量的公告[N]. 中国信息报,2021-12-15(01).
	Announcement of the National Bureau of Statistics on Cotton Yield in 2021[N]. China Information, 2021-12-15(01).
[3]	Chen Y, Hu S, Guo Z, et al. Effect of balanced nutrient fertilizer: A case study in Pinggu District, Beijing, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 754.
[4]	李继福, 何俊峰, 陈佛文, 等. 中国棉花生产格局与施肥研究现状——基于CNKI数据计量分析[J]. 中国棉花, 2019, 46(4):17-24,28. DOI
	LI Jifu, HE Junfeng, CHEN Fowen, et al. Research status of cotton production pattern and fertilization in China Based on CNKI data econometric analysis[J]. China Cotton, 2019, 46(4):17-24,28. DOI
[5]	郑曙峰, 韩效钊, 徐道青, 等. 长江流域棉花减量简化一次性施肥技术研究[J]. 中国棉花, 2020, 47(6):9-13. DOI
	ZHENG Shufeng, HAN Xiaozhao, XU Daoqing, et al. Study on simplified one-time fertilization technology for cotton reduction in the Yangtze River Basin[J]. China Cotton, 2020, 47(6):9-13. DOI
[6]	何萍, 徐新朋, 周卫, 等. 基于产量反应和农学效率的推荐施肥方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2017.
	HE Ping, XU Xinpeng, ZHOU Wei, et al. Recommended fertilization method based on yield response and agronomic efficiency[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2017.
[7]	Huang S H, He P, Jia L L, et al. Improving nitrogen use efficiency and reducing environmental cost with long-term nutrient expert management in a summer maize-winter wheat rotation system[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2021, 213.
[8]	沈若川, 丁文成, 高强, 等. 基于养分专家系统推荐施肥的北方马铃薯适宜氮肥用量研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28(5):880-893.
	SHEN Ruochuan, DING Wencheng, GAO Qiang, et al. Study on the appropriate nitrogen fertilizer amount for northern potato based on recommended fertilization by nutrient expert system[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2022, 28(5):880-893.
[9]	Alam M M, Karim M R, Ladha J K. Integrating best management practices for rice with farmers’ cropmanagement techniques: a potential option for minimizing rice yield gap[J]. Field Crops Research, 2013, 144(144):62-68. DOI URL
[10]	Pant C, Joshi P P, et al. Effect of Site Specific Nutrient Management Approach In Productivity Of Spring Rice In Kanchanpur, Nepal[J]. Malaysian Journal of Halal Research, 2020, 3(1).
[11]	Zhang J J, Ding W C, He P, et al. Establishment and Validation of Nutrient Expert System for Radish Fertilization Management in China[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2019, 111(5).
[12]	Mondal T, Mitra B, Das S. Precision nutrient management in wheat (Triticum aestivum) using Nutrient Expert?: Growth phenology, yield, nitrogen-use efficiency and profitability under eastern sub-Himalayan plains[J]. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 2018, 63(2):174-180.
[13]	何萍, 金继运, Mirasol F.Pampolino, 等. 基于作物产量反应和农学效率的推荐施肥方法[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18(2):499-505.
	HE Ping, JIN Jiyun, Mirasol F. et al. Pampolino, Recommended fertilization method based on crop yield response and agronomic efficiency[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2012, 18(2):499-505.
[14]	哈丽哈什·依巴提, 李传龙, 刘欢, 等. 基于产量反应的棉花推荐施肥效应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(1):72-79. DOI
	Halihashi Yibati, LI Chuanlong, LIU Huan, et al. Recommended Fertilization Effect of Cotton Based on Yield Response[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(1):72-79. DOI
[15]	孙绘健, 姚青青, 何忠盛, 等. 养分专家系统推荐施肥对棉花产量及肥料效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(8):1406-1417. DOI
	SUN Huijian, YAO Qingqing, HE Zhongsheng, et al. Effects of recommended fertilization by nutrient expert system on cotton yield and fertilizer efficiency[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(8):1406-1417. DOI
[16]	王宜伦, 白由路, 王磊, 等. 基于养分专家系统的小麦-玉米推荐施肥效应研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(22):4483-4492. DOI
	WANG Yilun, BAI Youlu, WANG Lei, et al. Effect of recommended fertilization on wheat-maize based on nutrient expert system[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(22):4483-4492. DOI
[17]	宋蝶, 陈新兵, 董洋阳, 等. 养分专家系统推荐施肥对苏北地区水稻产量和肥料利用率的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020, 28(1):68-75.
	SONG Die, CHEN Xinbing, DONG Yangyang, et al. Effects of recommended fertilization by nutrient expert system on rice yield and fertilizer use efficiency in northern Jiangsu[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2020, 28(1):68-75.
[18]	侯云鹏, 孔丽丽, 徐新朋, 等. 基于养分专家系统推荐施肥在东北玉米上的长期综合效应[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(19):129-138.
	HOU Yunpeng, KONG Lili, XU Xinpeng, et al. Effects of recommended fertilization by nutrient expert system on rice yield and fertilizer use efficiency in northern Jiangsu[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2021, 37(19):129-138.
[19]	徐新朋, 魏丹, 李玉影, 等. 基于产量反应和农学效率的推荐施肥方法在东北春玉米上应用的可行性研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(6):1458-1467.
	XU Xinpeng, WEI Dan, LI Yuying, et al. Feasibility study on the application of recommended fertilization method based on yield response and agronomic efficiency in spring maize in Northeast China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2016, 22(6):1458-1467.
[20]	梁俊梅, 张君, 安昊, 等. 养分专家系统推荐施肥对马铃薯产量及肥料利用率的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2019,(4):133-138.
	LIANG Junmei, ZHANG Jun, AN Hao, et al. Effects of fertilization recommended by nutrient expert system on potato yield and fertilizer use efficiency[J]. Crops, 2019,(4):133-138.
[21]	山楠, 串丽敏, 刘继培, 等. 养分专家系统推荐施肥在萝卜上的应用效果[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(11):125-134.
	SHAN Nan, CHUAN Limin, LIU Jipei, et al. Application effect of fertilization recommended by nutrient expert system on radish[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(11):125-134.
[22]	马征, 刘东升, 魏建林, 等. 基于养分专家系统的氮肥减施对大葱产量、品质及养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(11):9-14.
	MA Zheng, LIU Dongsheng, WEI Jianlin, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction based on nutrient expert system on yield, quality and nutrient absorption and utilization of onion[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 52(11):9-14.
[23]	黄晓萌, 徐新朋, 王秀斌, 等. 冬小麦养分专家推荐施肥系统在长江流域的可行性研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(8):1430-1439.
	HUANG Xiaomeng, XU Xinpeng, WANG Xiubin, et al. Feasibility study of winter wheat nutrient expert recommendation fertilization system in the Yangtze River Basin[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(8):1430-1439.
[24]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析(第三版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
	BAO Shidan. Soil agrochemical analysis (third ed.)[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000.
[25]	李朝英, 郑路. 流动分析仪同时快速测定植物全氮、全磷含量的方法改进[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021,(2):336-342.
	LI Chaoying, ZHENG Lu. The method of rapid determination of total nitrogen and total phosphorus in plants by flow analyzer was improved[J]. Soil and Fertilizers Sciences in China, 2021,(2):336-342.
[26]	李林洋, 夏淑洁, 张润花, 等. 氮钾互作对长江流域棉花产量和氮肥利用效率的影响及适宜施肥水平研究[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022,(1):40-46.
	LI Linyang, XIA Shujie, ZHANG Runhua, et al. Effects of nitrogen and potassium interaction on cotton yield and nitrogen use efficiency in the Yangtze River Basin and suitable fertilization levels[J]. Soil and Fertilizers Sciences in China, 2022,(1):40-46.
[27]	Chuan L M, He P, Pampolino M F, et al. Establishing a scientific basis for fertilizer recommendations for wheat in China: yield response and agronomic efficiency[J]. Field Crops Research, 2013, 140:1-8. DOI URL
[28]	徐新朋. 基于产量反应和农学效率的水稻和玉米推荐施肥方法研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2015.
	XU Xinpeng. Study on recommended fertilization methods for rice and maize based on yield response and agronomic efficiency[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2015.
[29]	郭小琰, 孙桂兰, 熊世武, 等. 施氮量对棉花养分吸收利用及产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(7):1246-1254. DOI
	GUO Xiaoyan, SUN Guilan, XIONG Shiwu, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rate on nutrient absorption and utilization, yield and quality of cotton[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(7):1246-1254. DOI
[30]	宋荣美, 贺奇志, 刘晓乐. 新疆农村棉花施肥中存在的问题和对策[J]. 农村科学实验, 2020,(7):75-76.
	SONG Rongmei, HE Qizhi, LIU Xiaole. Xinjiang rural cotton fertilization problems and countermeasures[J]. Rural Scientific Experiment, 2020,(7):75-76.
[31]	胡斌, 张民, 刘春生. 测土配方施肥对鲁西地区提高棉花产量及肥料利用效率的效果[J]. 中国棉花, 2014, 41(9):19-22. DOI
	HU Bin, ZHANG Min, LIU Chunsheng. Effect of soil testing and formulated fertilization on cotton yield and fertilizer use efficiency in Luxi area[J]. China Cotton, 2014, 41(9):19-22. DOI

试验点 Experimental location	土层 Soil horizon (cm)	全氮 Total nitrogen (g/kg)	全磷 Total phos phorus (g/kg)	全钾 Total potassium (g/kg)	有机质 Organic matter (g/kg)	碱解氮 Alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen (mg/kg)	有效磷 Available phos phorus (mg/kg)	速效钾 Rapidly available potassium (mg/kg)	pH值	电导率 Electric condu ctivity (μS/cm)
海楼村 Hailou village	0~20	0.60	0.36	7.12	12.77	26	12.2	128	8.38	253
海楼村 Hailou village	20~40	0.59	0.35	7.22	13.57	24	10.8	111	8.44	237
库木巴格村 Kumubag village	0~20	1.34	0.39	9.67	18.00	29	12.5	190	8.26	523
库木巴格村 Kumubag village	20~40	0.96	0.34	9.69	17.30	31	8.0	165	8.36	421

试验点 Experimental location	土层 Soil horizon (cm)	全氮 Total nitrogen (g/kg)	全磷 Total phos phorus (g/kg)	全钾 Total potassium (g/kg)	有机质 Organic matter (g/kg)	碱解氮 Alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen (mg/kg)	有效磷 Available phos phorus (mg/kg)	速效钾 Rapidly available potassium (mg/kg)	pH值	电导率 Electric condu ctivity (μS/cm)
海楼村 Hailou village	0~20	0.60	0.36	7.12	12.77	26	12.2	128	8.38	253
海楼村 Hailou village	20~40	0.59	0.35	7.22	13.57	24	10.8	111	8.44	237
库木巴格村 Kumubag village	0~20	1.34	0.39	9.67	18.00	29	12.5	190	8.26	523
库木巴格村 Kumubag village	20~40	0.96	0.34	9.69	17.30	31	8.0	165	8.36	421

试验点 Experi mental location	处理 Treat- ment	N (kg/hm²)	P₂O₅ (kg/hm²)	K₂O (kg/hm²)	有机肥 Organic fertilizer (kg/hm²)
海楼村 Hailou village	CK	0	0	0	0
	NE	253	95	60	0
	NE-N	0	95	60	0
	NE-P	253	0	60	0
	NE-K	253	95	0	0
	NE+OM	146.5	51.1	54.2	1 500
	FP	305	335	160	0
	OPTS	495	100	105	0
库木巴格村 Kumubag village	CK	0	0	0	0
	NE	247	70	60	0
	NE-N	0	70	60	0
	NE-P	247	0	60	0
	NE-K	247	70	0	0
	NE+OM	140.5	26.1	54.2	1 500
	FP	502.5	474	393	0
	OPTS	495	100	105	0

试验点 Experi mental location	处理 Treat- ment	N (kg/hm²)	P₂O₅ (kg/hm²)	K₂O (kg/hm²)	有机肥 Organic fertilizer (kg/hm²)
海楼村 Hailou village	CK	0	0	0	0
	NE	253	95	60	0
	NE-N	0	95	60	0
	NE-P	253	0	60	0
	NE-K	253	95	0	0
	NE+OM	146.5	51.1	54.2	1 500
	FP	305	335	160	0
	OPTS	495	100	105	0
库木巴格村 Kumubag village	CK	0	0	0	0
	NE	247	70	60	0
	NE-N	0	70	60	0
	NE-P	247	0	60	0
	NE-K	247	70	0	0
	NE+OM	140.5	26.1	54.2	1 500
	FP	502.5	474	393	0
	OPTS	495	100	105	0

试验点 Experi- mental loca- tion	处理 Treat- ment	株数 (株/hm²) Number of stems (plant/hm²)	单株铃数 Boll number per plant (g)	单铃重 Boll weight (g)	产量 Yield (kg/hm²)
海楼村 Hailou village	NE	188 276^a	4.22^a	6.18^a	4 915^a
	NE+OM	188 348^a	4.35^a	6.06^a	4 960^a
	FP	187 921^a	3.98^ab	5.96^a	4 460^abc
	OPTS	188 426^a	3.96^ab	6.11^a	4 553^ab
	CK	187 694^a	3.66^b	5.19^c	3 561^d
	NE-N	187 723^a	3.77^b	5.44^b	3 846^cd
	NE-P	188 139^a	3.82^b	5.57^b	4 002^cd
	NE-K	188 182^a	4.01^ab	5.56^b	4 196^cd
	自由度	23	23	23	23
	F值	0.333	3.544	24.413	11.757
	F_0.05	0.927	0.017	<0.001	<0.001
库木巴格村 Kumu bag village	NE	148 500^a	6.54^a	5.79^a	5 621^a
	NE+OM	148 194^a	6.55^a	5.78^a	5 511^ab
	FP	148 806^a	5.83^b	5.79^a	5 034^c
	OPTS	148 806^a	5.25^c	5.88^a	5 104^bc
	CK	147 660^a	4.63^d	5.58^b	3 818^d
	NE-N	148 500^a	4.83^cd	5.75^a	4 132^d
	NE-P	147 736^a	4.87^cd	5.85^a	4 206^d
	NE-K	149 417^a	5.71^b	5.79^a	4 934^c
	自由度	23	23	23	23
	F值	0.106	31.832	2.555	20.800
	F_0.05	0.977	<0.001	0.570	<0.001
试验点 Experimental location		^***	^***	NS	^***
处理 Treatment		NS	^***	^***	^***
试验点×处理 Experimental location ×treatment		NS	^***	^***	NS

基于养分专家系统的棉花推荐施肥效应

Effect of recommended fertilization on cotton based on nutrient expert system

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

试验点 Experimental location	处理 Treatment	产值 Yield value (Yuan/hm²)	肥料投入 Fertilizer input (Yuan/hm²)	效益 Benefit (Yuan)	产投比 Ratio of output to Input	较CK增收 Increased income compared to CK(Yuan)
海楼村 Hailou village	NE	51 607.2^a	2 461.1	49 146.0^a	20.0^a	11 752.3
	NE+OM	52 078.0^a	6 318.0	45 760.0^ab	7.2^c	8 366.4
	FP	46 829.4^a	5 194.9	41 634.5^b	8.0^c	4 240.8
	OPTS	47 809.0^a	4 084.6	43 724.4^ab	10.7^b	6 330.7
	CK	37 393.7^b	—	—	—	—
库木巴格村 Kumubag village	NE	59 020.4^a	2 238.9	56 781.5^a	25.4^a	16 694.7
	NE+OM	57 867.4^ab	6 095.7	51 771.7^b	8.5^c	11 684.8
	FP	52 860.1^c	8 781.8	44 078.4^c	5.0^d	3 991.6
	OPTS	53 590.9^bc	4 084.6	49 506.3^b	12.1^b	9 419.5
	CK	40 086.8^d	—	—	—	—

试验点 Experimental location	处理 Treatment	表观利用率 Apparent use efficiency(%)			农学效率 Agronomic efficiency(kg/kg)			偏生产力 Partial factor productivity(kg/kg)
试验点 Experimental location	处理 Treatment	N	P₂O₅	K₂O	N	P₂O₅	K₂O	N	P₂O₅	K₂O
海楼村 Hailou village	NE	43.72^a	24.03^a	65.57^a	4.23^a	9.61^a	10.47^a	19.43^a	51.74^a	81.92^a
	NE+OM	41.59^b	18.90^b	60.71^b	4.40^a	10.08^a	11.22^a	19.60^a	52.21^a	82.66^a
	FP	28.88^c	5.56^c	28.75^d	2.01^b	1.37^b	1.08^c	14.67^b	13.31^c	27.87^c
	OPTS	19.72^d	18.20^b	32.19^c	1.43^c	1.11^c	2.53^b	9.20^c	45.53^b	43.36^b
	自由度	11	11	11	11	11	11	11	11	11
	F值	113.942	76.197	163.135	16.424	13.509	20.666	99.269	175.811	226.586
	F_0.05	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	0.002	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
库木巴格村 Kumubag village	NE	44.49^a	27.71^a	95.90^a	6.03^a	20.21^a	11.45^a	24.65^a	80.30^a	93.68^a
	NE+OM	46.38^a	26.99^a	85.55^a	5.58^b	18.64^b	9.62^b	23.15^b	78.73^a	91.85^a
	FP	20.66^b	9.41^c	16.00^c	1.8^d	1.75^d	0.26^d	9.92^c	10.62^c	12.81^c
	OPTS	15.14^c	11.28^b	31.86^b	1.96^c	8.98^c	1.62^c	9.10^c	51.04^b	48.61^b
	自由度	11	11	11	11	11	11	11	11	11
	F值	642.214	62.08	436.512	206.709	210.613	1 656.628	1 039.11	1 596.614	1 770.152
	F_0.05	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
试验点 Experimental location		NS	^**	^***	^***	^***	^***	NS	^***	NS
处理 Treatment		^***	^***	^***	^***	^***	^***	^***	^***	^***
试验点×处理 Experimental location×treatment		^***	^***	^***	^***	^***	^***	^***	^***	^***

[1]	陈茂光, 林涛, 张昊, 刘海军, 王一帆, 汤秋香. 地膜类型对棉花生长的影响及自身降解和回收特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108.
[2]	杨川, 张凯, 陈冰, 张慧, 柳萍, 常松, 盛建东. 棉花植株形态特征对不同水分状况的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2120-2127.
[3]	杨国江, 陈云, 林祥群, 何江勇, 刘盛林, 曲永清. 氮肥减施下有机肥替代对滴灌棉花产量、氮素吸收利用及土壤硝态氮的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145.
[4]	陈传信, 张永强, 聂石辉, 孔德鹏, 赛力汗·赛, 徐其江, 雷钧杰. 生物质炭施用量对滴灌冬小麦生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2146-2151.
[5]	王立红, 张宏芝, 张跃强, 李剑峰, 王重, 高新, 时佳, 王春生, 夏建强, 樊哲儒. 不同产量水平冬小麦产量差异形成的干物质生产、转运及氮肥利用分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2152-2162.
[6]	王晓雨, 王小平, 史文宇, 刘美艳, 马健, 郭云鹏, 宋瑞欣, 王清涛. 拔节期冬小麦光合特性、干物质积累和产量对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2163-2172.
[7]	向莉, 王仙, 董裕生, 郭小玲, 方伏荣, 陈智军, 马艳明, 苗雨. 外源丁酸对干旱胁迫下大麦产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2173-2181.
[8]	杨红梅, 张跃强, 史应武, 吾买尔江·库尔班, 林青, 王宁, 楚敏, 曾军. 不同类型叶面肥喷施对冬小麦籽粒产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2182-2188.
[9]	马明杰, 赵经华, 李冬民, 杨胜春, 王克贤, 李池. 不同灌溉方式对苜蓿土壤水分与灌溉水利用效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2306-2313.
[10]	王心, 林涛, 崔建平, 吴凤全, 唐志轩, 崔来园, 郭仁松, 王亮, 郑子漂. 种植模式与灌溉定额对机采长绒棉产量及纤维品质形成的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1821-1829.
[11]	李雪玲, 郭俊先, 陈莉, 宋鹤岭, 张众. 不同覆膜宽度对棉花农田环境的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1840-1847.
[12]	董艳雪, 贾永红, 张金汕, 李丹丹, 王凯, 罗四维, 王润琪, 石书兵. 不同生态区环境下春小麦干物质积累及产量形成分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1848-1857.
[13]	李怀胜, 艾洪玉, 孟玲, 王贺亚, 张磊, 艾海峰. 减氮下运筹养分吸收高峰期追施比例对春小麦的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1866-1872.
[14]	张超, 白云岗, 郑明, 肖军, 丁平. 极端干旱区葡萄水肥协同效应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1931-1939.
[15]	阳妮, 玛依拉·玉素音, 杨延龙, 李春平, 张大伟, 徐海江, 赖成霞. 黄萎病枯斑型与黄化型病症棉花叶片的植物挥发物对比[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1975-1986.