三种植物提取物对棉花种子发芽及幼苗生长影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.12.006

新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (12): 2902-2910.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.12.006

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学·土壤肥料 • 上一篇下一篇

三种植物提取物对棉花种子发芽及幼苗生长影响

周小云¹^,²(), 张军高¹^,²^,³, 周佳玉², 李进¹^,²^,³, 秦冰霜², 梁晶¹^,², 龚静云¹^,², 雷斌¹^,²^,³()

1.新疆农业科学院核技术生物技术研究所/农业农村部荒漠绿洲作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830091
2.新疆作物化学调控工程技术研究中心/农业农村部盐碱土改良与利用(干旱半干旱区盐碱地) 重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830091
3.新疆绿洲兴源农业科技有限责任公司,乌鲁木齐 830091

收稿日期:2023-03-21 出版日期:2023-12-20 发布日期:2024-01-03
通信作者: 雷斌(1973-),男,四川巴中人,研究员,博士,研究方向为农药研制及作物化控技术,(E-mail)leib668@xaas.ac.cn
作者简介:周小云(1977-),男,重庆人,研究员,博士,研究方向为作物化控与生物技术,(E-mail)xiaoyunzhou77@126.com
基金资助:
新疆维吾尔自治区重点研发项目(2022B02001-2);新疆维吾尔自治区财政厅专项(65000022P007862101422);乡村振兴项目“塔额盆地优质绿色小麦安全生产关键技术示范应用”(2020NC018);新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金重点项目(2022D01D44);“一带一路”农药研发基地建设项目(65000024P008758100965);新疆农业科学院青年科技骨干创新能力培养项目(xjnkq-2019018);新疆维吾尔自治区重大科技专项(2023A02003-5)

Preliminary study on the effects of three plant extracts on cotton seed germination and seedling growth

ZHOU Xiaoyun¹^,²(), ZHANG Jungao¹^,²^,³, ZHOU Jiayu², LI Jin¹^,²^,³, QIN Bingshuang², LIANG Jing¹^,², GONG Jingyun¹^,², LEI Bin¹^,²^,³()

1. Institute of nuclear technology and Biotechnology of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of desert oasis crop physiology, ecology and farming of the Ministry of agriculture, Urumqi 830091,China
2. Xinjiang Crop Chemical Regulation Engineering Technology Research Center / Improvement and utilization of saline alkali soil of the Ministry of agriculture and rural areas (saline alkali land in arid and semi-arid areas) Key Laboratory, Urumqi 830091,China
3. Xinjiang oasis Xingyuan Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd., Urumqi 830091,China

Received:2023-03-21 Online:2023-12-20 Published:2024-01-03
Correspondence author: LEI Bin (1973-), male, Sichuan, researcher, Ph. D., research direction: crop chemical control research, (E-mail)leib668@xaas.ac.cn
Supported by:
The key R & D project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(2022B02001-2);The special project of the finance department of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(65000022P007862101422);The rural revitalization project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(2020NC018);The Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(2022D01D44);"One Belt and One Road" pesticide R&D base construction project(65000024P008758100965);The Innovation Ability Training Project for Young Sci-Tech Backbone Talents Sponsored by Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences(xjnkq-2019018);Major science and technology projects of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(2023A02003-5)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究不同植物甲醇提取物对棉花种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响,分析最佳的植物提取物种类及浓度,为新型植物生长调节剂的研制提供试验依据和理论基础。【方法】选用棉花品种新陆早57号为材料,以蒸馏水处理为对照,将苦豆子、曼陀罗、孜然3种植物甲醇提取物浸膏分别制备成5种不同浓度(100、10、1、0.1、0.01 mg/mL)的溶液浸种后,采用砂培法开展萌发试验,分析发芽势、发芽率、株高、茎粗、叶片光合等指标,并采用主成分分析方法比较植物提取物对棉花生长的生物学效应。【结果】与对照相比,1 mg/mL苦豆子提取物处理的棉种发芽率、发芽指数分别增加8.89%、7.10%,幼苗的茎粗、须根数、鲜重、干重以及干物质转运率分别提高24.61%、20.00%、66.09%、50.00%以及4.90%;0.1 mg/mL孜然甲醇提取物处理的棉花种子发芽率、茎粗、须根数、净光合速率分别增加8.00%、7.33%、10.00%、12.90%。1 mg/mL苦豆子提取物处理综合评价分排在第1位,0.1 mg/mL孜然提取物处理的综合评价分次之。【结论】植物提取物对棉花种子萌发及幼苗生长具有不同调控作用,整体呈现出高浓度抑制、低浓度促进的现象。其中,1 mg/mL苦豆子提取物处理最优,0.1 mg/mL孜然提取物处理次之。

关键词: 棉花; 植物提取物; 萌发; 生长发育

Abstract:

【Objective】To study the allelopathic effects of different plant methanol extracts on cotton seed germination and seedling growth, clarify the type of plant extracts with the best allelopathic effect and determine the appropriate concentration, so as to provide experimental basis and theoretical guidance for the development of new plant growth regulators.【Methods】Taking the popularized cotton seed Xinluzao 57 as the experimental material and the distilled water treatment as the control, the methanol extracts of Sophra alopecuroides, Euphorbia pekinensis, Cuminum cyminum were prepared into five solutions with different concentrations (100,10, 1, 0.1 and 0.01 mg/mL), respectively. After soaking of the seeds, the sand culture method was used to carry out the germination test to investigate the germination potential, germination rate, plant height, stem diameter, leaf photosynthesis and other indicators, and the principal component analysis method was applied to compare the biological effects of plant extracts on cotton growth.【Results】Compared with CK, the germination rate and germination index of cotton seeds treated with 1 mg/mL Sophra alopecuroides extract increased by 8.89% and 7.10% respectively, and the stem diameter, fibrous root number, fresh weight, dry weight and dry matter transport rate of seedlings increased by 24.61%, 20.00%, 66.09%, 50.00% and 4.90%, respectively; The germination rate, stem diameter, number of fibrous roots and net photosynthetic rate of cotton seeds treated with 0.1 mg/mL Cuminum cyminum methanol extract increased by 8.00%, 7.33%, 10.00% and 12.90%, respectively. Further principal component analysis showed that the comprehensive evaluation of 1 mg/mL Sophra alopecuroides extract treatment ranked first, followed by 0.1 mg/mL Cuminum cyminum extract treatment.【Conclusion】Different concentrations of plant extracts have different regulatory effects on cotton seed germination and seedling growth. Among them, 1 mg/mL l Sophra alopecuroides extract treatment is the best, followed by 0.1 mg/mL Cuminum cyminum extract treatment.

Key words: cotton; plant extracts; germination; growth and development

中图分类号:

周小云, 张军高, 周佳玉, 李进, 秦冰霜, 梁晶, 龚静云, 雷斌. 三种植物提取物对棉花种子发芽及幼苗生长影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 2902-2910.

ZHOU Xiaoyun, ZHANG Jungao, ZHOU Jiayu, LI Jin, QIN Bingshuang, LIANG Jing, GONG Jingyun, LEI Bin. Preliminary study on the effects of three plant extracts on cotton seed germination and seedling growth[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(12): 2902-2910.

图/表 5

参考文献 24

[1]	谭海军. 中国生物农药的概述与展望[J]. 世界农药, 2022, 44(4):16-27.
	TAN Haijun. Review and prospect of biological pesticides in China[J]. World Pesticide, 2022, 44(4):16-27.
[2]	郭美薇, 吕建洲. 苦参碱制剂作为生物刺激素对玉米种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2019, 34(6):42-46.
	GUO Meiwei, LYU Jianzhou. Effect of matrine preparation as bio-stimulant on maize seed germination and seedling growth[J]. Phosphate&Compound Fertilizer, 2019, 34(6):42-46.
[3]	查佳雪, 宗绪和, 陈星言, 等. 苦参碱对绿豆种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 园艺与种苗, 2016, 22(7):126-128.
	CHA Jiaxue, ZONG Xuhe, CHEN Xingyan, et al. Effects of Matrine on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Wheat[J]. Tianjin Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 22(7):126-128.
[4]	周苗苗, 姜雪, 金独英, 等. 苦参碱对小麦种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 园艺与种苗, 2016, (2) :28-29,45.
	ZHOU Miaomiao, JIANG Xue, JIN Duying, et al. Effects of matrine on seed germination and seedling growth of wheat[J]. Horticulture and Seedling, 2016,(2) :28-29,45.
[5]	Sunohara Y, Nakano K, Matsuyama S, et al. Cuminaldehyde, a cumin seed volatile component, induces growth inhibition, overproduction of reactive oxygen species and cell cycle arrest in onion roots[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2021, 289.
[6]	Jones A M P, Shukla M R, Sherif S M, et al. Growth regulating properties of isoprene and isoprenoid-based essential oils[J]. Plant Cell Reports, 2016, 35(1):91-102. DOI PMID
[7]	Gouda N A A, Saad M M G, Abdelgaleil S A M. Pre and post herbicidal activity of monoterpenes against barnyard grass (Echinochloa crus-galli)[J]. Weed Science, 2016, 64(1):191-200. DOI URL
[8]	来庆捷, 孙婧迪, 于明斌, 等. 曼陀罗生物碱对绿豆种子萌发生长的影响[J]. 南方农业, 2016, 10(9):181-186.
	LAI Qingjie, SUN Jingdi, YU mingbin, et al. Effects of Datura alkaloids on the germination and growth of mung bean seeds[J]. South China Agriculture, 2016, 10(9):181-186.
[9]	郑秀芳, 李彩霞. 曼陀罗生物碱对玉米种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 33(5):121-126.
	ZHENG Xiufang, LI Caixia. Effects of Datura stramonium L, s Alkaloids on Maize Seeds Germination and Seedling Growth[J]. Journal of Southwest China Normal University (Natural Science Ed.), 2008, 33(5):121-126.
[10]	胡林峰, 李广泽, 李艳艳, 等. 孜然化学成分及其生物活性研究进展[J]. 西北植物学报, 2005, (8) :1700-1705.
	HU Linfeng, LI Guangze, LI Yanyan, et al. Research progress on chemical constituents and bioactivity of cuminum cyminum[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2005,(8):1700-1705.
[11]	郭小强. 苦豆子种子提取物对小麦幼苗生长的影响[J]. 甘肃农业, 2012, (9):70-71.
	GUO Xiaoqiang. Effect of bitter bean seed extract on wheat seedling growth[J]. Gansu Agriculture, 2012,(9):70-71.
[12]	高荣岐, 张春庆. 种子生物学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2009.
	GAO Rongqi, ZHANG Chunqing. Seed Biology[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2009.
[13]	施成晓, 陈婷, 王昌江, 等. 干旱胁迫对不同抗旱性小麦种子萌发发及幼苗根芽生物量分配的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2016, 36(4) :483-490.
	SHI Chengxiao, CHEN Ting, WANG Changjiang, et al. Effect of drought stress on seed germination and biomass allocation of root and shoot of different drought resistant wheat cultivars[J]. Journal of Wheat Crops, 2016, 36(4) :483-490.
[14]	吕丽荣. 茶多酚对盐处理下小麦幼苗叶片光合特性及抗氧化反应的影响[D]. 兰州: 西北师范大学, 2018.
	LYU Lirong. Effects of Tea Polyphenols on photosynthetic characteristics and antioxidant response of wheat seedling leaves under salt treatment[D]. Lanzhou: Northwest Normal University, 2018.
[15]	Bruce Williamson G, Richardson D. Bioassays for allelopathy: measuring treatment responses with independent controls[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1988, 14(1):181-7. DOI PMID
[16]	王倩, 孙会军, 孙令强, 等. 化感物质及作用机理田[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2005, (S1):70-74
	WANG Qian, SUN Huijun, SUN Lingqiang, et al. Allelopathic Substances and Mechanisms of Action[J]. Chinese Vegetables, 2005,(S1):70-74.
[17]	张琴, 刘占文, 李艳宾, 等. 核桃叶水浸提液对棉花生长及棉花枯萎病菌的影响[J]. 生态科学, 2017, 36 (1) :165-169.
	ZHANG Qin, LIU Zhanwen, LI Yanbin, et al. Allelopathic effects of walnut leaf water extract on cotton growth and cotton fusarium wilt[J]. Ecological Sciences, 2017, 36 (1) :165-169.
[18]	张笑聪. 银杏外种皮提取物对桑叶及蚕茧产质量的影响[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2020.
	ZHANG Xiaocong. Effects of ginkgo biloba exotesta extract on the yield and quality of mulberry leaves and cocoons[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2020.
[19]	孙君艳, 刘俊强, 张耀洲, 等. 香附水提液对小麦幼苗生理活性酶的影响[J]. 基因组学与应用生物学, 2019, 38 (4):1697-1701.
	SUN Junyan, LIU Junqiang, Zhang Yaozhou, et al. Effect of rhizoma cyperi aqueous extract on physiological active enzymes of wheat seedlings[J]. Genomics and Applied Biology, 2019, 38 (4) :1697-1701.
[20]	秦学功, 马忠海, 元英进. 苦豆子生物碱的农用活性初步研究[J]. 佳木斯大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, (3):340-344.
	QIN Xuegong, MA Zhonghai, YUAN Yingjin. Exploration for pesticide activity of alkaloids from sophora alopecuroides L.[J]. Journal of Jiamusi University (Natural Science Ed.), 2002,(3):340-344.
[21]	刘姚姚, 张瑞, 沈晓飞, 等. 毛竹林不同浸提液对浙江楠幼苗生长的影响研究[J]. 西部林业科学, 2020, 49 (3) :99-108.
	LIU Yaoyao, ZHANG Rui, SHEN Xiaofei, et al. Effects of different extracts from Moso bamboo forest on the growth of photinia chekiangensis seedlings[J]. Western Forestry Sciences, 2020, 49(3):99-108.
[22]	张笑聪, 郁万文, 蔡金峰, 等. 银杏外种皮提取物对桑叶生长、生理指标及蚕茧质量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36 (10) :47-52. DOI
	ZHANG Xiaocong, YU Wanwen, CAI Jinfeng, et al. Effects of ginkgo biloba exotesta extract on mulberry leaf growth, physiological indexes and cocoon quality[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36 (10):47-52. DOI
[23]	陈小凤, 黄如葵, 冯诚诚, 等. 苦瓜芽期耐冷性鉴定与评价[J]. 种子, 2017, 36(1) :36-39.
	CHEN Xiaofeng, HUANG Rukui, FENG Chengcheng, et al. Identification and evaluation of cold tolerance of balsam pear at bud stage[J]. Seed, 2017, 36(1) :36-39.
[24]	李珍, 云岚, 张玉霞. 10个饲用燕麦品种种子萌发期耐盐碱性的综合评价[J]. 种子, 2019, 38 (11) :90-95.
	LI Zhen, Yun LAN, ZHANG Yuxia. Comprehensive evaluation of salt and alkaline tolerance of 10 forage oat varieties during seed germination[J] Seed, 2019, 38(11) :90-95.

不同处理 Different treatments	发芽势 Germination potential(%)	感应指数 Response Index	发芽率 Germination rate(%)	感应指数 Response Index	发芽指数 Germination Index	感应指数 Response Index	活力指数 Vitality Index	感应指数 Response Index
CK	6.67±2.89^a	—	75.00±8.67^b	—	34.67±26.30^ab	—	201.7±1.06^ab	—
C₁	1.67±2.89^ab	-2.99	28.33±10.41^c	-1.65	3.77±1.70^c	-8.20	20.18±1.06^c	-9.00
C₂	0.00	0.00	30.00±0.00^c	-1.50	1.49±0.49^c	22.27	7.62±1.08^c	-25.47
C₃	0.00	0.00	15.00±13.23^c	-4.00	1.42±0.15^c	23.42	6.30±1.05^c	-31.02
C₄	8.67±2.89^a	0.23	81.00±5.00^a	0.07	36.73±0.64^a	0.06	207.73±1.04^a	0.03
C₅	7.67±2.89^a	0.13	80.67±11.55^ab	0.07	35.02±0.24^ab	0.01	206.66±1.04^a	0.02
S₁	1.67±2.89^ab	-2.99	25.00±13.22^c	-2.00	1.85±0.37^c	17.74	9.49±1.05^c	-20.25
S₂	3.33±2.89^ab	-1.00	28.33±10.41^c	-1.65	1.33±0.61^c	25.07	6.51±1.06^c	-29.98
S₃	7.67±2.89^a	0.13	81.67±34.03^a	0.08	37.13±0.45^a	0.07	190.53±1.30^ab	-0.06
S₄	0.00	0.00	73.33±5.77^b	-0.02	32.47±1.84^ab	-0.07	155.90±1.01^b	-0.29
S₅	5.00±5.00^ab	-0.33	71.67±11.55^b	-0.05	31.16±0.28^ab	-0.11	170.18±1.08^b	-0.19
E₁	1.67±2.89^b	-2.99	10.00±5.00^c	-6.50	1.87±0.87^c	17.54	11.00±1.05^c	-17.34
E₂	3.33±2.89^b	-1.00	55.00±0.00^bc	-0.36	25.66±0.44^bc	-0.35	16.11±1.09^c	-11.52
E₃	5.00±0.00^ab	-0.33	41.67±20.21^bc	-0.80	20.86±0.25^bc	-0.66	128.84±1.12^bc	-0.57
E₄	3.33±5.77^b	-1.00	65.00±18.03^b	-0.15	21.42±0.92^bc	-0.62	113.10±1.62^bc	-0.78
E₅	5.00±5.00^ab	-0.33	75.00±10.00^b	0.00	32.51±1.16^ab	-0.07	171.12±1.10^b	-0.18

不同处理 Different treatments	发芽势 Germination potential(%)	感应指数 Response Index	发芽率 Germination rate(%)	感应指数 Response Index	发芽指数 Germination Index	感应指数 Response Index	活力指数 Vitality Index	感应指数 Response Index
CK	6.67±2.89^a	—	75.00±8.67^b	—	34.67±26.30^ab	—	201.7±1.06^ab	—
C₁	1.67±2.89^ab	-2.99	28.33±10.41^c	-1.65	3.77±1.70^c	-8.20	20.18±1.06^c	-9.00
C₂	0.00	0.00	30.00±0.00^c	-1.50	1.49±0.49^c	22.27	7.62±1.08^c	-25.47
C₃	0.00	0.00	15.00±13.23^c	-4.00	1.42±0.15^c	23.42	6.30±1.05^c	-31.02
C₄	8.67±2.89^a	0.23	81.00±5.00^a	0.07	36.73±0.64^a	0.06	207.73±1.04^a	0.03
C₅	7.67±2.89^a	0.13	80.67±11.55^ab	0.07	35.02±0.24^ab	0.01	206.66±1.04^a	0.02
S₁	1.67±2.89^ab	-2.99	25.00±13.22^c	-2.00	1.85±0.37^c	17.74	9.49±1.05^c	-20.25
S₂	3.33±2.89^ab	-1.00	28.33±10.41^c	-1.65	1.33±0.61^c	25.07	6.51±1.06^c	-29.98
S₃	7.67±2.89^a	0.13	81.67±34.03^a	0.08	37.13±0.45^a	0.07	190.53±1.30^ab	-0.06
S₄	0.00	0.00	73.33±5.77^b	-0.02	32.47±1.84^ab	-0.07	155.90±1.01^b	-0.29
S₅	5.00±5.00^ab	-0.33	71.67±11.55^b	-0.05	31.16±0.28^ab	-0.11	170.18±1.08^b	-0.19
E₁	1.67±2.89^b	-2.99	10.00±5.00^c	-6.50	1.87±0.87^c	17.54	11.00±1.05^c	-17.34
E₂	3.33±2.89^b	-1.00	55.00±0.00^bc	-0.36	25.66±0.44^bc	-0.35	16.11±1.09^c	-11.52
E₃	5.00±0.00^ab	-0.33	41.67±20.21^bc	-0.80	20.86±0.25^bc	-0.66	128.84±1.12^bc	-0.57
E₄	3.33±5.77^b	-1.00	65.00±18.03^b	-0.15	21.42±0.92^bc	-0.62	113.10±1.62^bc	-0.78
E₅	5.00±5.00^ab	-0.33	75.00±10.00^b	0.00	32.51±1.16^ab	-0.07	171.12±1.10^b	-0.18

不同处理 Treatments	株高 Strain heigh (cm)	感应指数 Response Index	茎粗 Stem diameter(mm)	感应指数 Response Index	主根长 Taproot length(cm)	感应指数 Response Index	须根数 Number of fibers root	感应指数 Response Index
CK	10.57±1.00^ab	—	1.91±0.11^ab	—	30.2±3.01^b	—	10.00±1.00^b	—
C₁	9.73±0.90^ab	-0.09	1.90±0.12^ab	-0.01	28.65±2.09^bc	-0.05	8.00±0.80^b	-0.25
C₂	9.30±0.90^ab	-0.14	2.20±0.20^a	0.13	28.09±2.01^bc	-0.08	6.00±0.60^b	-0.67
C₃	8.07±0.80^b	-0.31	1.96±0.11^ab	0.03	27.97±1.98^c	-0.08	8.00±0.80^b	-0.25
C₄	10.23±1.00^a	-0.03	2.05±0.22^a	0.07	32.19±3.12^a	0.06	11.00±1.00^ab	0.09
C₅	10.73±1.00^a	0.01	2.04±0.11^a	0.06	31.2±3.02^ab	0.03	19.00±1.90^a	0.47
S₁	9.33±0.90^ab	-0.13	2.32±0.17^a	0.18	28.98±1.98^bc	-0.04	5.00±0.50^b	-1.00
S₂	8.90±0.89^b	-0.19	1.64±0.12^b	-0.16	29.13±1.86^bc	-0.04	6.00±0.61^b	-0.67
S₃	9.33±0.93^ab	-0.13	2.38±0.21^a	0.20	32.88±3.11^a	0.08	12.00±1.20^a	0.17
S₄	8.73±0.87^b	-0.21	2.08±0.11^a	0.08	30.23±3.02^b	0.00	6.00±0.51^b	-0.67
S₅	9.93±0.90^ab	-0.06	2.27±0.21^a	0.16	30.74±2.88^b	0.02	12.00±1.20^a	0.17
E₁	10.70±1.00^a	0.01	2.13±0.13^a	0.10	28.88±2.77^bc	-0.05	13.00±1.20^a	0.23
E₂	11.77±1.18^a	0.10	1.93±0.11^ab	0.01	29.15±2.19^b	-0.04	8.00±0.71^b	-0.25
E₃	11.23±1.12^a	0.06	2.03±0.12^a	0.06	30.19±2.78^b	0.00	10.00±1.00^b	0.00
E₄	9.60±0.97^ab	-0.10	2.28±0.21^a	0.16	29.41±2.56^b	-0.03	12.00±1.20^a	0.17
E₅	9.57±0.96^ab	-0.10	1.79±0.11^b	-0.07	30.78±2.65^b	0.02	7.00±0.61^b	-0.43

不同处理 Treatments	株高 Strain heigh (cm)	感应指数 Response Index	茎粗 Stem diameter(mm)	感应指数 Response Index	主根长 Taproot length(cm)	感应指数 Response Index	须根数 Number of fibers root	感应指数 Response Index
CK	10.57±1.00^ab	—	1.91±0.11^ab	—	30.2±3.01^b	—	10.00±1.00^b	—
C₁	9.73±0.90^ab	-0.09	1.90±0.12^ab	-0.01	28.65±2.09^bc	-0.05	8.00±0.80^b	-0.25
C₂	9.30±0.90^ab	-0.14	2.20±0.20^a	0.13	28.09±2.01^bc	-0.08	6.00±0.60^b	-0.67
C₃	8.07±0.80^b	-0.31	1.96±0.11^ab	0.03	27.97±1.98^c	-0.08	8.00±0.80^b	-0.25
C₄	10.23±1.00^a	-0.03	2.05±0.22^a	0.07	32.19±3.12^a	0.06	11.00±1.00^ab	0.09
C₅	10.73±1.00^a	0.01	2.04±0.11^a	0.06	31.2±3.02^ab	0.03	19.00±1.90^a	0.47
S₁	9.33±0.90^ab	-0.13	2.32±0.17^a	0.18	28.98±1.98^bc	-0.04	5.00±0.50^b	-1.00
S₂	8.90±0.89^b	-0.19	1.64±0.12^b	-0.16	29.13±1.86^bc	-0.04	6.00±0.61^b	-0.67
S₃	9.33±0.93^ab	-0.13	2.38±0.21^a	0.20	32.88±3.11^a	0.08	12.00±1.20^a	0.17
S₄	8.73±0.87^b	-0.21	2.08±0.11^a	0.08	30.23±3.02^b	0.00	6.00±0.51^b	-0.67
S₅	9.93±0.90^ab	-0.06	2.27±0.21^a	0.16	30.74±2.88^b	0.02	12.00±1.20^a	0.17
E₁	10.70±1.00^a	0.01	2.13±0.13^a	0.10	28.88±2.77^bc	-0.05	13.00±1.20^a	0.23
E₂	11.77±1.18^a	0.10	1.93±0.11^ab	0.01	29.15±2.19^b	-0.04	8.00±0.71^b	-0.25
E₃	11.23±1.12^a	0.06	2.03±0.12^a	0.06	30.19±2.78^b	0.00	10.00±1.00^b	0.00
E₄	9.60±0.97^ab	-0.10	2.28±0.21^a	0.16	29.41±2.56^b	-0.03	12.00±1.20^a	0.17
E₅	9.57±0.96^ab	-0.10	1.79±0.11^b	-0.07	30.78±2.65^b	0.02	7.00±0.61^b	-0.43

不同处理 Treatments	鲜重 Fresh weight (g)	感应指数 Response Index	干重 Dry weight (g)	感应指数 Response Index	干物质转率 Dry matter conversion rate(%)	感应指数 Response Index	呼吸消耗量 Respiratory consumption (mg/株)	感应指数 Response Index
CK	1.74±0.11^b	—	0.10±0.01^b	—	39.82±3.81^ab	—	30.22±3.01^b	—
C₁	1.78±0.12^ab	0.02	0.13±0.01^b	0.23	38.66±2.44^b	-0.030	33.17±3.17^a	0.089
C₂	0.86±0.06^b	-1.02	0.16±0.01^ab	0.38	38.21±3.21^b	-0.012	32.19±3.01^a	-0.030
C₃	1.36±0.13^ab	-0.28	0.09±0.01^b	-0.11	37.65±3.27^b	-0.015	32.08±3.08^a	-0.003
C₄	2.64±0.21^a	0.34	0.50±0.03^a	0.80	40.93±3.88^a	0.080	30.11±2.98^b	-0.065
C₅	2.58±0.21^a	0.33	0.70±0.05^a	0.86	40.02±3.85^ab	-0.023	29.91±2.91^b	-0.007
S₁	0.31±0.02^b	-4.61	0.05±0.01^b	-1.00	39.12±3.41^b	-0.023	32.11±3.01^a	0.069
S₂	1.44±0.11^ab	-0.21	0.13±0.01^b	0.23	39.26±3.91^ab	0.004	30.78±2.90^b	-0.043
S₃	2.89±0.19^a	0.40	0.15±0.02^b	0.33	41.77±3.85^a	0.060	29.88±2.88^b	-0.030
S₄	0.64±0.05^b	-1.72	0.05±0.01^b	-1.00	39.34±3.91^ab	-0.062	30.15±2.56^b	0.009
S₅	1.90±0.14^ab	0.08	0.12±0.01^b	0.17	39.55±3.82^ab	0.005	30.17±2.67^b	0.001
E₁	0.63±0.05^b	-1.76	0.08±0.01^b	-0.25	39.25±3.80^ab	-0.008	30.98±2.89^b	0.026
E₂	0.45±0.05^b	-2.87	0.07±0.01^b	-0.43	39.33±3.41^ab	0.002	30.89±2.85^b	-0.003
E₃	0.73±0.07^b	-1.38	0.12±0.01^b	0.17	39.35±3.80^ab	0.001	30.98±2.94^b	0.003
E₄	0.89±0.07^b	-0.96	0.10±0.01^b	0.00	39.31±3.71^ab	-0.001	31.02±3.01^ab	0.001
E₅	0.85±0.08^b	-1.05	0.10±0.01^b	0.00	39.87±3.80^ab	0.014	30.13±3.03^b	-0.030

三种植物提取物对棉花种子发芽及幼苗生长影响

Preliminary study on the effects of three plant extracts on cotton seed germination and seedling growth

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 24

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

不同处理 Treatments	净光合速率 Net photosynthesis rate (μmol/(m²·S))	蒸腾速率 Transpiration rate (mmol/(m²·S))	气孔导度 Stomatal conductance (mol/(m²·S))	胞间二氧化碳浓度 Intercellular CO₂ concentration (μmol/mol)	气孔限制值 Stomatal limiation
CK	3.1±0.2^b	1.01±0.1^ab	21.1±2.1^b	281.3±8.7^b	0.3^ab
C₁	3.0±0.1^b	1.02±0.1^ab	20.1±2.4^b	271.3±8.5^b	0.3^ab
C₂	2.8±0.1^b	1.02±0.1^a	20.4±2.1^b	279.3±16.7^b	0.2^ab
C₃	2.9±0.1^b	1.01±0.1^ab	20.2±2.5^b	271.3±15.3^b	0.2^ab
C₄	3.5±0.2^a	1.04±0.1^a	22.0±2.1^a	296.3±20.7^a	0.3^ab
C₅	3.4±0.1^a	1.03±0.2^a	22.2±3.1^a	295.3±20.8^a	0.2^ab
S₁	3.0±0.1_b	1.02±0.1^a	20.1±2.7_b	286.3±7.9^ab	0.4^a
S₂	2.8±0.1_b	1.01±0.1^ab	20.2±2.1_b	289.3±8.4^ab	0.2^ab
S₃	3.3±0.2^ab	1.03±0.1^a	22.2±2.4^a	301.3±14.1^a	0.3^a
S₄	3.0±0.1_b	1.02±0.2^a	21.3±2.2^ab	291.3±13.1^a	0.3^ab
S₅	2.9±0.1_b	1.02±0.1^a	21.1±2.4_b	287.3±7.8^ab	0.3^ab
E₁	2.8±0.2_b	1.01±0.1^a	20.2±2.3_b	281.3±9.9_b	0.2^ab
E₂	3.0±0.1_b	1.01±0.1^ab	20.2±2.2_b	287.3±14.9^ab	0.3^ab
E₃	2.9±0.1_b	1.02±0.2^a	21.3±2.1_b	291.3±18.6^a	0.2^ab
E₄	3.0±0.2_b	1.01±0.1^ab	20.8±2.5_b	295.3±9.7^a	0.3^ab
E₅	2.8±0.1_b	1.02±0.1^a	21.7±2.2_b	292.3±9.4^a	0.2^ab

不同处理 Treatments	因子Factors				F₁	F₂	F₃	F₄	F	排序 Order
不同处理 Treatments	Factor 1	Factor 2	Factor 3	Factor 4	F₁	F₂	F₃	F₄	F	排序 Order
CK	0.97	0.09	-0.39	-0.58	2.57	0.13	-0.43	-0.59	0.96	3
C₁	-1.10	-0.17	0.64	-0.53	-2.92	-0.24	0.70	-0.54	-1.27	15
C₂	-1.31	0.39	0.37	0.31	-3.48	0.54	0.41	0.31	-1.25	14
C₃	-1.43	0.15	1.46	-0.55	-3.78	0.21	1.60	-0.56	-1.39	16
C₄	1.53	-1.02	0.82	0.32	4.06	-1.42	0.90	0.32	1.65	2
C₅	0.99	-3.34	-0.58	0.03	2.62	-4.63	-0.64	0.03	-0.02	8
S₁	-1.08	0.69	0.24	1.05	-2.86	0.96	0.27	1.07	-0.79	11
S₂	-0.63	0.32	0.82	-2.09	-1.67	0.44	0.90	-2.13	-0.81	12
S₃	1.55	-0.12	1.24	1.90	4.10	-0.17	1.36	1.94	2.29	1
S₄	0.27	1.00	0.71	-0.10	0.71	1.39	0.77	-0.10	0.74	5
S₅	0.62	0.18	-0.11	0.91	1.65	0.25	-0.12	0.93	0.90	4
E₁	-0.93	0.13	-1.47	0.45	-2.46	0.19	-1.60	0.46	-1.23	13
E₂	-0.12	0.43	-1.96	-0.62	-0.31	0.60	-2.14	-0.63	-0.48	10
E₃	0.00	0.26	-1.52	-0.16	0.00	0.36	-1.67	-0.16	-0.25	9
E₄	0.00	0.23	-0.19	1.11	0.01	0.32	-0.21	1.13	0.23	7
E₅	0.66	0.79	-0.10	-1.45	1.74	1.09	-0.11	-1.48	0.73	6

[1]	陈茂光, 林涛, 张昊, 刘海军, 王一帆, 汤秋香. 地膜类型对棉花生长的影响及自身降解和回收特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108.
[2]	杨川, 张凯, 陈冰, 张慧, 柳萍, 常松, 盛建东. 棉花植株形态特征对不同水分状况的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2120-2127.
[3]	杨国江, 陈云, 林祥群, 何江勇, 刘盛林, 曲永清. 氮肥减施下有机肥替代对滴灌棉花产量、氮素吸收利用及土壤硝态氮的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145.
[4]	陈传信, 张永强, 聂石辉, 孔德鹏, 赛力汗·赛, 徐其江, 雷钧杰. 生物质炭施用量对滴灌冬小麦生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2146-2151.
[5]	宋冰梅, 姜岩, 陈鑫, 张宇, 程宛楠, 潘洪生. 新型转基因高产棉花萌发期和苗期耐盐性与耐碱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2239-2247.
[6]	李雪玲, 郭俊先, 陈莉, 宋鹤岭, 张众. 不同覆膜宽度对棉花农田环境的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1840-1847.
[7]	鞠乐, 齐军仓, 陈培育, 牛银亭, 阴志刚. 干旱胁迫对大麦种子萌发、幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1879-1886.
[8]	阳妮, 玛依拉·玉素音, 杨延龙, 李春平, 张大伟, 徐海江, 赖成霞. 黄萎病枯斑型与黄化型病症棉花叶片的植物挥发物对比[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1975-1986.
[9]	魏迎凤, 张全成, 查慧, 王小丽, 王俊刚. 二甲戊灵对龙葵苗期主要生长发育和生理指标的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 2013-2021.
[10]	米尔扎提·木塔力甫, 石秀楠, 柏军兵, 祖拜代·阿布都克日木, 吾勒加勒哈斯·阿扎提, 石书兵. 不同脱绒方式及PEG胁迫下对棉花种子活力及幼苗性状的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1561-1568.
[11]	肖菁, 刘宁, 许明海, 张金波, 马艳明, 王莉, 徐麟. NaCl胁迫对糜子种子萌发的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1623-1629.
[12]	来汉林, 沈煜洋, 陈利, 杨红, 李月, 雷钧杰, 李广阔, 高海峰. 温度和盐胁迫对播娘蒿种子萌发特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1326-1334.
[13]	王兴州, 时晓磊, 张恒, 曲可佳, 耿洪伟, 丁孙磊, 张金波, 严勇亮. 引进春小麦品种萌发期耐盐性鉴定及评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1353-1362.
[14]	江柱, 张江辉, 白云岗, 杨鹏年, 刘洪波, 肖军, 刘旭辉. 膜下咸水滴灌水肥盐调控对棉花生长及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1389-1397.
[15]	王文涛, 吴博, 邰红忠, 练文明, 戴翠荣, 李双江, 蒲艳梅. 新疆阿拉尔垦区不同播期对棉花生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1413-1422.