不同葡萄品种的耐盐性比较分析

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.04.012

新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (4): 880-888.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.04.012

• 园艺特产·林业·设施农业 • 上一篇下一篇

不同葡萄品种的耐盐性比较分析

陈丽靓(), 鲁倩君, 马媛媛, 刘迎, 赵宝龙, 孙军利()

石河子大学农学院/特色果蔬栽培生理与种质资源利用兵团重点实验室,新疆石河子 832000

收稿日期:2022-08-20 出版日期:2023-04-20 发布日期:2023-05-06
通信作者: 孙军利(1976-),女,河南焦作人,教授,研究方向为园艺植物生理调节,(E-mail)1530322722@qq.com
作者简介:陈丽靓(1997-),女,新疆人,硕士研究生,研究方向为果树生理,(E-mail)1339004564@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“葡萄抗盐砧木筛选及其耐盐适应性反应机制研究”(32060647);国家自然科学基金项目“葡萄抗性砧木提高赤霞珠植株白藜芦醇含量的机理研究”(32060648);石河子大学育种项目(XZZX202104)

Effects of NaCl stress on antioxidant enzyme content and malondialdehyde content in grape cultivars leaves

CHEN Liliang(), LU Qianjun, MA Yuanyuan, LIU Ying, ZHAO Baolong, SUN Junli()

Key Laboratory of Characteristic Fruits and Vegetables Cultivation Physiology and Germplasm Resources Utilization of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps/College of Agronomy,Shihezi University,Shihezi Xinjiang 832003,China

Received:2022-08-20 Online:2023-04-20 Published:2023-05-06
Correspondence author: SUN Junli (1976-), female, Jiaozuo, Henan, professor, research direction for the phys-iological regulation of horticultural plants, (E-mail)1530322722@qq.com
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China "Screening of salt-resistant rootstock of grape and the mechanism of salt-tolerant adaptive reaction"(32060647);National Natural Science Foundation of China "Mechanism of Grape resistant rootstock increasing resveratrol content of Cabernet Sauvignon"(32060648);Breeding Project of Shihezi University(XZZX202104)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究不同葡萄品种耐盐性,为耐盐葡萄品种的筛选提供理论支持。【方法】以葡萄品种5BB、101-14、SO4、3309M、贝达、抗砧3号、喀什哈尔、木纳格、和田红、夏黑10份盆栽葡萄品种幼苗为材料,采用盆栽灌盐培养的方式,研究100 mmol/L NaCl胁迫对不同葡萄品种叶片的盐害指数、光合作用、抗氧化酶含量和丙二醛含量等指标的影响,运用主成分分析比较其耐盐性。【结果】100 mmol/L NaCl胁迫下,和田红、木纳格、喀什哈尔、夏黑的SOD、CAT、POD活性、净光合速率(Pn)、气孔导度(Gs)和蒸腾速率(Tr)与对照相比增幅最大,胞间二氧化碳(Ci)和丙二醛含量降幅最小;101-14、抗砧3号、贝达的SOD、CAT、POD活性、净光合速率(Pn)、气孔导度(Gs)和蒸腾速率(Tr)与对照相比增幅较大,胞间二氧化碳(Ci)和丙二醛含量降幅较小;3309M、5BB、S04的SOD、CAT、POD活性,净光合速率(Pn)、气孔导度(Gs)和蒸腾速率(Tr)与对照相比增幅最小,胞间二氧化碳(Ci)和丙二醛含量降幅最小。【结论】和田红、木纳格、喀什哈尔、夏黑为耐盐品种,101-14、抗砧3号、贝达为中等耐盐品种,3309 M、5BB、S04为不耐盐品种。

关键词: 葡萄; NaCl胁迫; 耐盐性; 光合作用; 抗氧化酶; 丙二醛

Abstract:

【Objective】To compare grape cultivars salt tolerance in the hope of providing theoretical support for the selection of salt-tolerant grape varieties by using ten grape varieties.【Methods】The experimental materials were cultured by pot irrigation with salt by adopting potted salt irrigation method cultivate to study the effects of 100 mmol/L NaCl stress on the salt damage index, photosynthesis, antioxidant enzyme content and malondialdehyde content of different grape varieties. Meanwhile, salt tolerance was compared through principal component analysis.【Results】Under 100 mmol/L NaCl stress, the activities of SOD, CAT, POD, net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs) and transpiration of Kashhar,Munage,Hetian Red,Summer Black the rate (Tr) had the largest increase compared to the control. The content of intercellular carbon dioxide (Ci) and malondialdehyde decreased the least.The SOD, CAT, POD activities, net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs) and transpiration rate (Tr) of 101-14,Beda,Kangzhen 3 increased significantly compared with the control. The content of intercellular carbon dioxide (Ci) and malondialdehyde decreased slightly. The SOD, CAT, POD activities, net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs) and transpiration rate (Tr) of 5BB, SO4,3309M had the smallest increase compared with the control, and the increase of intercellular carbon dioxide (Ci) and The content of malondialdehyde decreased the least.【Conclusion】Kashhar,Munage,Hetian Red and Summer Black are salt-tolerant varieties, 101-14,Beda and Kangzhen 3 are moderately salt-tolerant varieties, and 5BB,SO4 and 3309M are salt intolerant varieties.

Key words: grape; NaCl stress; salt tolerance; photosynthesis; antioxidant enzymes; malonaldehyde

中图分类号:

S663.1

陈丽靓, 鲁倩君, 马媛媛, 刘迎, 赵宝龙, 孙军利. 不同葡萄品种的耐盐性比较分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 880-888.

CHEN Liliang, LU Qianjun, MA Yuanyuan, LIU Ying, ZHAO Baolong, SUN Junli. Effects of NaCl stress on antioxidant enzyme content and malondialdehyde content in grape cultivars leaves[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 880-888.

图/表 6

参考文献 30

[1]	文章, 耿贵, 王宇光, 等. 盐胁迫下耐盐甜菜生理及其蛋白差异表达分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(32):8-16. DOI
	WEN Zhang, GENG Gui, WANG Yuguang, et al. Physiological and protein differential expression analysis of salt tolerant sugar beet under salt stress[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(32):8-16. DOI
[2]	Zhao H Q, Wang L, Hong J, et al. Oxidative stress of maize roots caused by a combination of both salt stress and manganese deprivation[J]. Cereal Research Communications, 2014, 42(4):568-577. DOI URL
[3]	朱新广, 张其德. NaCl对光合作用影响的研究进展[J]. 植物学通报, 1999,(4):332-338.
	ZHU Xinguang, ZHANG Qide. Research progress on the influence of NaCl on photosynthesis[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 1999,(4):332-338.
[4]	赵可夫. 植物对盐渍逆境的适应[J]. 生物学通报, 2002,(6):7-10.
	ZHAO Kefu. The adaptation of plants to salt adversity[J]. Bulletin of Biology, 2002,(6):7-10.
[5]	廖祥儒, 贺普超, 朱新产. 盐渍对葡萄光合色素含量的影响[A]. 贺普超.葡萄研究论文选集[C].北京:中国园艺学会, 2003.
	LIAO Xiangru, HE Puchao, ZHU Xinchan. The effect of salting on the photosynthetic pigment content of grapes[A]. HE Puchao. Collection of grape research papers [C]. Beijing:Chinese Horticultural Society, 2003.
[6]	李会云, 郭修武. 盐胁迫对葡萄砧木叶片保护酶活性和丙二醛含量的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2008,(2):240-243.
	LI Huiyun, GUO Xiuwu. Effects of salt stress on protective enzyme activities and malondialdehyde content of grape rootstock leaves[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2008,(2):240-243.
[7]	Sreenivasulu N, Grimm B, Wobus U, et al. Differential response of antioxidant compounds to salinity stress in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive seedlings of fox-tail millet (Setaria italica)[J]. Physiol Plant, 2001,(9):435-442.
[8]	雷成军. 盐胁迫对红地球葡萄苗生长生理指标及抗病性的影响[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2012.
	LEI Chengjun. Effects of salt stress on the growth and physiological indexes and disease resistance of Red Globe grape seedlings[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2012.
[9]	袁军伟, 李敏敏, 贾楠, 等. 21份葡萄砧木品种资源耐盐性鉴定[J]. 西北农业学报, 2019, 28(4):602-606.
	YUAN Junwei, LI Minmin, JIA Nan,etal. Identification of salt tolerance of 21 grape rootstock varieties resources[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2019, 28(4):602-606.
[10]	牛锐敏, 许泽华, 沈甜, 等. 盐胁迫对不同品种葡萄砧木生长的影响[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2017, 58(3):1-3, 6.
	NIU Ruimin, XU Zehua, SHEN Tian, et al. Effects of salt stress on the growth of different varieties of grape rootstocks[J]. Ningxia Agriculture and Forestry Science and Technology, 2017, 58(3):1-3, 6.
[11]	孙茜. 四种葡萄砧木抗旱、耐盐碱性的比较研究[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2014.
	SUN Qian. Comparative study on drought resistance and salt-alkali tolerance of four grape rootstocks[D]. Yinchuan: Ningxia University, 2014.
[12]	吴梦晓, 张晓雪, 李众, 等. 葡萄砧木的耐盐性评价[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2017,(5):14-18.
	WU Mengxiao, ZHANG Xiaoxue, LI Zhong, et al. Evaluation of the salt tolerance of grape rootstocks[J]. Sino-Overseas Grapevine & Wine, 2017,(5):14-18.
[13]	马跃. 葡萄砧木苗期耐盐试验初报[J]. 葡萄栽培与酿酒, 1991,(3): 6-8.
	MA Yue. Preliminary report on salt tolerance test of grape rootstock during seedling stage[J]. Viticulture and Winemaking, 1991, (3): 6-8.
[14]	王连君, 皇甫淳, 王鸣, 等. 盐碱胁迫下山葡萄的叶绿素含量与耐盐碱性关系的研究[J]. 葡萄栽培与酿酒, 1995, 75(4):1-3.
	WANG Lianjun, HUANGFU Chun, WANG Ming, et al. Study on the relationship between chlorophyll content and salt-alkali tolerance of Vitis vinifera under salt-alkali stress[J]. Viticulture and Winemaking, 1995, 75(4):1-3.
[15]	刘崇怀, 沈育杰, 陈俊, 等. 葡萄种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.
	LIU Chonghuai, SHEN Yujie, CHEN Jun, et al. Description and data standards for grape germplasm resources[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006.
[16]	邹琦. 植物生理学试验指导[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
	ZOU Qi. Guidance of plant physiology experiment[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000.
[17]	Kochba J, Lavee S, Spiegel-Roy P. Differences in peroxidase activity and isoenzymes in embryogenic ane non-embryogenic 'Shamouti' orange ovular callus lines[J]. Plant & Cell Physiology, 1977, 18(2).
[18]	李合生. 植物生理生化试验原理及技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.
	LI Hesheng. The principle and technology of plant physiology and biochemistry experiment[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000.
[19]	李会云, 郭修武. 盐胁迫对葡萄砧木叶片保护酶活性和丙二醛含量的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2008,(2):240-243.
	LI Huiyun, GUO Xiuwu. Effects of salt stress on protective enzyme activities and malondialdehyde content of grape rootstock leaves[J]. Acta Prudenza Sinica, 2008,(2):240-243.
[20]	Belew D, Astakief T, Mokashi M N. Effects of salinity and mycorrhizal inoculation( Glomus fasciculatum) on growth responses of grape rootstocks(Vitis spp )[J]. South African Journal for Enology and Viticulture, 2010, 31(2):82-88.
[21]	Southey J M, Jooste J H. Physiological response of Vitis vinifera L. cv.chenin blanc grafted onto different rootstocks on a relatively saline soil[J]. South African Journal for Enology and Viticulture, 1992, 13(1):10-22.
[22]	付晴晴. 左山一杂交砧木株系耐盐评价及钠离子吸收分配特征研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2018.
	FU Qingqing. Evaluation of Salt Tolerance and Characteristics of Sodium Ion Absorption and Distribution of Hybrid Rootstock of Zuoshanyi[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2018.
[23]	李学孚, 倪智敏, 吴月燕, 等. 盐胁迫对‘鄞红’葡萄光合特性及叶片细胞结构的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(13):4436-4444.
	LI Xuefu, NI Zhimin, WU Yueyan,etal, RAO Huiyun. Effects of salt stress on photosynthetic characteristics and leaf cell structure of‘Yinhong’ grape[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(13):4436-4444.
[24]	秦玲, 康文怀, 齐艳玲, 等. 盐胁迫对酿酒葡萄叶片细胞结构及光合特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(20):4233-4241. DOI
	QIN Ling, KANG Wenhuai, QI Yanling,etal. Effects of salt stress on cell structure and photosynthetic characteristics of wine grape leaves[J] Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(20):4233-4241. DOI
[25]	Sreenivasulu N, Grimm B, Wobus U. Differential response of antioxidant compounds to salinity stress in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive seedlings of fox-tail millet (Setaria italica)[J]. Physiol Plant, 2001,(9):435-442.
[26]	郝玉杰. NaCl胁迫对两个葡萄品种生长及生理特性的影响[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2017.
	HAO Yujie. Effects of NaCl stress on the growth and physiological characteristics of two grape varieties[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2017.
[27]	秦红艳, 沈育杰, 李昌禹, 等. 不同葡萄品种膜质过氧化和保护酶活性对盐胁迫的响应[J]. 北方园艺, 2010,(20):4-9.
	QIN Hongyan, SHEN Yujie, LI Changyu, et al. Response of membrane peroxidation and protective enzyme activities of different grape cultivars to salt stress[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2010,(20):4-9.
[28]	马丽清, 韩振海, 周二峰, 等. 盐胁迫对珠美海棠和山定子膜保护酶系统的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2006, 23(4):495-499.
	MA Liqing, HAN Zhenhai, ZHOU Erfeng, et al. Effects of salt stress on the protective enzyme system of Begonia zhumei Heshan lamina[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2006, 23(4):495-499.
[29]	韩志平, 郭世荣, 尤秀娜, 等. 盐胁迫对西瓜幼苗活性氧代谢和渗透调节物质含量的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2010, 30(11):2210-2218.
	HAN Zhiping, GUO Shirong, YOU Xiuna, etal. Effects of salt stress on active oxygen metabolism and osmotic adjustment substance content in watermelon seedlings[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2010, 30(11):2210-2218.
[30]	张亚冰, 刘崇怀, 潘兴, 等. 盐胁迫下不同耐盐性葡萄砧木丙二醛和脯氨酸含量的变化[J]. 河南农业科学, 2006,(4):84-86. DOI
	ZHANG Yabing, LIU Chonghuai, PAN Xing, et al. Changes in the contents of malondialdehyde and proline in different salt-tolerant grape rootstocks under salt stress[J]. Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2006,(4):84-86.

品种 Varieties	盐害指数 Salt damage index (%)	耐盐性排序 Salt tolerance ordination	耐盐性分类 Salt tolerance classification
和田红 Hetianhong	23.0	1	强
木纳格 Munage	25.0	2	强
喀什哈尔 Kashihaer	26.0	3	强
夏黑 Xiahei	33.0	4	强
101-14	48.0	5	中
抗3 Kang 3	50.0	6	中
贝达 Beida	53.0	7	中
3309M	63.0	8	弱
5BB	65.0	9	弱
SO4	70.0	10	弱

品种 Varieties	盐害指数 Salt damage index (%)	耐盐性排序 Salt tolerance ordination	耐盐性分类 Salt tolerance classification
和田红 Hetianhong	23.0	1	强
木纳格 Munage	25.0	2	强
喀什哈尔 Kashihaer	26.0	3	强
夏黑 Xiahei	33.0	4	强
101-14	48.0	5	中
抗3 Kang 3	50.0	6	中
贝达 Beida	53.0	7	中
3309M	63.0	8	弱
5BB	65.0	9	弱
SO4	70.0	10	弱

品种 Cultivars	处理 Treat	净光合速率 Pn (μmol/(m²·s))	气孔导度 Gs (mol/(m²·s))	胞间CO₂浓度 Ci (μmol/mol)	蒸腾速率 Tr (mmol/(m²·s))
和田红 Hetianhong	CK	7.434±0.012^a	0.105±0.004^a	104.18±4.061^a	5.820±0.008^a
和田红 Hetianhong	T	5.067±0.003^b	0.083±0.001^b	113.67±5.398^a	4.570±0.005^b
木纳格 Munage	CK	6.388±0.410^a	0.077±0.012^a	139.28±0.075^a	3.007±0.001^a
木纳格 Munage	T	3.637±0.010^b	0.052±0.003^b	171.46±7.180^a	2.405±0.404^b
喀什哈尔 Kashihaer	CK	5.417±0.148^a	0.080±0.005^a	103.23±0.567^a	2.710±0.003^a
喀什哈尔 Kashihaer	T	3.279±0.005^b	0.050±0.021^b	126.34±1.127^a	1.770±0.014^b
夏黑 Xiahei	CK	6.526±0.003^a	0.080±0.002^ba	118.75±2.447^a	2.088±0.004^a
夏黑 Xiahei	T	3.405±0.042^b	0.056±0.023^b	123.16±3.483^a	1.386±0.003^b
101-14	CK	5.568±0.058^a	0.092±0.008^a	357.64±6.318^b	2.290±0.001^a
101-14	T	2.783±0.292^b	0.048±0.001^b	449.85±4.418^a	1.093±0.002^b
抗3 Kang 3	CK	6.123±0.027^a	0.074±0.004^a	228.48±4.727^b	2.462±0.002^a
抗3 Kang 3	T	2.430±0.001^b	0.037±0.004^b	317.11±5.607^a	1.086±0.015^b
贝达 Beida	CK	6.129±0.278^a	0.071±0.003^a	355.32±4.604^b	3.941±0.006^a
贝达 Beida	T	2.202±0.174^b	0.034±0.005^b	450.29±5.096^a	1.929±0.005^b
3309M	CK	4.790±0.224^a	0.078±0.001^b	342.41±4.561^b	3.660±0.005^a
3309M	T	1.525±0.042^b	0.025±0.008^b	490.11±1.554^a	1.179±0.189^b
5BB	CK	5.425±0.002^a	0.068±0.001^a	312.02±0.572^b	3.266±0.002^a
5BB	T	1.515±0.025^b	0.026±0.001^b	460.65±0.910^a	1.206±0.235^b
SO4	CK	7.431±0.063^a	0.087±0.006^a	304.21±1.129^b	2.976±0.011^a
SO4	T	2.069±0.011^b	0.030±0.002^b	470.12±0.093^a	0.814±0.004^b

品种 Cultivars	处理 Treat	净光合速率 Pn (μmol/(m²·s))	气孔导度 Gs (mol/(m²·s))	胞间CO₂浓度 Ci (μmol/mol)	蒸腾速率 Tr (mmol/(m²·s))
和田红 Hetianhong	CK	7.434±0.012^a	0.105±0.004^a	104.18±4.061^a	5.820±0.008^a
和田红 Hetianhong	T	5.067±0.003^b	0.083±0.001^b	113.67±5.398^a	4.570±0.005^b
木纳格 Munage	CK	6.388±0.410^a	0.077±0.012^a	139.28±0.075^a	3.007±0.001^a
木纳格 Munage	T	3.637±0.010^b	0.052±0.003^b	171.46±7.180^a	2.405±0.404^b
喀什哈尔 Kashihaer	CK	5.417±0.148^a	0.080±0.005^a	103.23±0.567^a	2.710±0.003^a
喀什哈尔 Kashihaer	T	3.279±0.005^b	0.050±0.021^b	126.34±1.127^a	1.770±0.014^b
夏黑 Xiahei	CK	6.526±0.003^a	0.080±0.002^ba	118.75±2.447^a	2.088±0.004^a
夏黑 Xiahei	T	3.405±0.042^b	0.056±0.023^b	123.16±3.483^a	1.386±0.003^b
101-14	CK	5.568±0.058^a	0.092±0.008^a	357.64±6.318^b	2.290±0.001^a
101-14	T	2.783±0.292^b	0.048±0.001^b	449.85±4.418^a	1.093±0.002^b
抗3 Kang 3	CK	6.123±0.027^a	0.074±0.004^a	228.48±4.727^b	2.462±0.002^a
抗3 Kang 3	T	2.430±0.001^b	0.037±0.004^b	317.11±5.607^a	1.086±0.015^b
贝达 Beida	CK	6.129±0.278^a	0.071±0.003^a	355.32±4.604^b	3.941±0.006^a
贝达 Beida	T	2.202±0.174^b	0.034±0.005^b	450.29±5.096^a	1.929±0.005^b
3309M	CK	4.790±0.224^a	0.078±0.001^b	342.41±4.561^b	3.660±0.005^a
3309M	T	1.525±0.042^b	0.025±0.008^b	490.11±1.554^a	1.179±0.189^b
5BB	CK	5.425±0.002^a	0.068±0.001^a	312.02±0.572^b	3.266±0.002^a
5BB	T	1.515±0.025^b	0.026±0.001^b	460.65±0.910^a	1.206±0.235^b
SO4	CK	7.431±0.063^a	0.087±0.006^a	304.21±1.129^b	2.976±0.011^a
SO4	T	2.069±0.011^b	0.030±0.002^b	470.12±0.093^a	0.814±0.004^b

项目 Item	第一主成分 The first principal component	第二主成分 The second principal component
SOD	0.968	-0.192
MDA	-0.95	-0.047
CAT	0.948	0.112
GS	0.93	0.089
CI	-0.92	0.079
POD	0.904	-0.218
Tr	0.772	0.325
Pn	-0.03	0.966
特征值 Eigen values	5.866	1.152
方差贡献率 Proportion of variance (%)	73.324	14.398
累计贡献率 Cumulative variance (%)	73.324	87.722

不同葡萄品种的耐盐性比较分析

Effects of NaCl stress on antioxidant enzyme content and malondialdehyde content in grape cultivars leaves

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

品种 Cultivars	Y₁	Y₂	综合主成分Y Comprehensive principal components	排名 Ranking
和田红 Hetianhong	4.963	2.285	5.643	1
木纳格 Munage	2.554	1.121	2.856	2
喀什哈尔 Kashihaer	2.493	0.749	2.484	3
夏黑 Xiahei	1.765	0.671	1.882	4
101-14	-0.300	-0.375	-0.549	5
抗砧3号 Kang 3	-0.503	-0.264	-0.601	6
贝达 Beida	-1.238	-0.572	-1.409	7
3309 M	-2.395	-1.083	-2.706	8
5BB	-3.250	-1.239	-3.470	9
SO4	-4.088	-1.292	-4.131	10

[1]	韩守安, 王敏, 麦合木提·图如普, 谢辉, 艾尔买克·才卡斯木, 刘佳乐, 张雯, 潘明启. 不同光质处理对赤霞珠葡萄叶片光合特性及果实品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1894-1903.
[2]	肖乐乐, 李志强, 冶军, 蒲敏, 阮向阳, 刘怀金. 肽肥与镁配施对森田尼无核葡萄品质和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1904-1912.
[3]	朱学慧, 张雯, 马云龙, 何鹏飞, 韩守安, 王敏, 田嘉, 谢辉. 不同生态环境下葡萄光合特性差异性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1913-1921.
[4]	王曼, 张政, 伊丽达娜·迪力夏提, 吴斌. 木纳格葡萄谷胱甘肽-S-转移酶VvGST1基因克隆与序列分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1922-1930.
[5]	张超, 白云岗, 郑明, 肖军, 丁平. 极端干旱区葡萄水肥协同效应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1931-1939.
[6]	肖菁, 刘宁, 许明海, 张金波, 马艳明, 王莉, 徐麟. NaCl胁迫对糜子种子萌发的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1623-1629.
[7]	柏玲, 冯国郡, 胡相伟, 赵云, 石书兵. 不同谷子品种萌发期抗旱鉴定及生理变化[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1630-1640.
[8]	杨晓娟, 靳娟, 樊丁宇, 郝庆, 杨磊, 耿文娟. 极端高温环境对骏枣和伏脆蜜枣光合特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1679-1688.
[9]	贺腾飞, 刘英玉, 张柳青, 陈旺, 李泽亚, 胡芸, 蒋金豆, 祖力胡马尔·艾力. 新疆牛羊源金黄色葡萄球菌D353质粒pD353序列分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1806-1812.
[10]	韦伟, 单守明, 徐文娣, 李光宗. 山葡萄‘双优’组织培养生根期愈伤组织的转录组分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1451-1459.
[11]	张燕红, 侯天钰, 巴音花, 赵彩月, 吕玉平, 布哈丽且木·阿不力孜, 赵志强, 李冬, 杜孝敬, 袁杰, 王奉斌. 水稻重组自交系群体芽期和苗期耐盐性鉴定与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1041-1049.
[12]	田文强, 郭飞, 聂凌帆, 孙刚刚, 王泓懿, 史永清, 尚艳明, 吴利, 石书兵, 张金汕. 超晚播对冬小麦光合特性、干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1059-1066.
[13]	哈力旦·依克热木, 刘娜, 刘联正, 周安定, 姜奇彦, 达买力江·合孜尔, 曹俊梅, 张新忠. 小麦近缘种芽期和苗期的耐盐性鉴定与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1118-1126.
[14]	周伟权, 侯毅兴, 刘春燕, 阿克居里德孜·努尔改里得, 薛靖, 李树德, 周龙. 不同葡萄砧穗组合嫁接对根系生长特性及解剖结构的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1170-1180.
[15]	常雪花, 闫波雯, 翟荣臻, 张政, 吴斌, 魏佳. 二氧化硫对木纳格葡萄采后糖含量及糖代谢途径的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1216-1225.