播期及覆膜处理对旱稻养分吸收和产量的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.03.003

新疆农业科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (3): 412-418.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.03.003

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学·耕作栽培·土壤肥料 • 上一篇下一篇

播期及覆膜处理对旱稻养分吸收和产量的影响

范晓芳¹, 索常凯¹, 褚璇¹, 王露霞¹, 冶军¹, 窦浩², 王蔚铭²

1.石河子大学农学院资环系,新疆石河子 832003;
2.新疆禾伯农业科技有限责任公司,新疆克拉玛依 834000

收稿日期:2020-03-24 出版日期:2021-03-20 发布日期:2021-03-30
通信作者: 冶军(1974-) 男,新疆霍城人,教授,研究方向为新型肥料,(E-mail) yejun.shz@ 163.com
作者简介:范晓芳(1986-),女,新疆沙湾人,硕士研究生,研究方向为新型肥料,(E-mail)fanxiaofang-520@163.com
基金资助:
国家科技支撑计划“滴灌条件下粮食作物水肥资源高效利用与农田肥力提升研究与示范”(2012BAD42B02)

Effects of Sowing Dates and Plastic Film Mulching on Nutrient Uptake and Yield of Upland Rice

FAN Xiaofang¹, SUO Changkai¹, CHU Xuan¹, WANG Luxia¹, YE Jun¹, DOU Hao², WANG Yuming²

1. Department of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi Xinjiang 832003, China;
2. Xinjiang Hebo Agricultural Technology Co., LTD., Karamay Xinjiang 834000, China

Received:2020-03-24 Online:2021-03-20 Published:2021-03-30
Correspondence author: YE Jun(1974-)male, Birthplace:Huocheng, Xinjiang, professor, Master Tutor, engaging in new fertilizer and modern fertilization technology research, (E-mail) yejun. shz@ 163.com
Supported by:
National Science and Technology Support Project "Research and Demonstration on Efficient Utilization of Water and Fertilizer Resources of Grain Crops and Improvement of Farmland Fertility under Drip Irrigation" (2012BAD42B02)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】 研究裸地和覆膜处理与不同播期组合对旱稻生长、养分吸收及产量的影响。【方法】 采用田间试验,设置裸地和覆膜2个处理,每处理3个播期,即4月15日(早播)、5月1日(适播)、5月15日(晚播),旱稻品种选用旱香1号、旱香2号,分析旱稻的干物质重、养分吸收及产量。【结果】 覆膜处理旱稻干物质重、养分吸收及产量均显著高于裸地处理,分别高出14.7%~19.5%、8.8%~54.2%和18.4%~24.0%。不覆膜条件下,晚播干物质重、养分吸收及产量均显著高于早播,分别高出17.5%~22.1%、23.3%~55.0%和71.7%~85.1%。覆膜条件下,适播处理干物质重、养分吸收及产量最高,较早播和晚播分别增加9.0%~18.0%、7.5%~30.3%和3.6%~24.8%。【结论】 旱稻在覆膜和适播条件下,有利于旱稻生长和养分吸收,并提高产量,为最佳的栽培模式。

关键词: 旱稻; 播期; 覆膜; 养分吸收; 产量

Abstract: 【Objective】 The field experiments were conducted to study the effects of bare land, plastic film mulching and different sowing dates on growth, nutrient uptake and yield of upland rice.【Methods】 Two treatments of bare land and plastic mulch were set up, and the three sowing dates of each treatment were April 15 (early sowing), May 1 (suitable sowing), and May 15 (late sowing). The dry matter weight, nutrient absorption and yield of upland rice were analyzed by using upland rice varieties Haxiang 1 and Haxiang 2.【Results】 The dry matter weight, nutrient uptake and yield in film mulched upland rice treatment were 14.7%-19.5%, 8.8%-54.2% and 18.4%-24.0% higher than those in bare land treatments respectively. The dry matter weight, nutrient uptake and yield in late sowing treatment were 17.5%-22.1%, 23.3%-55.0% and 71.7%-85.1% higher than those in early sowing treatments respectively. Under the plastic film mulching treatment, the dry matter weight, nutrient uptake and yield of suitable sowing treatment were the highest, which were increased by 9.0%-18.0%, 7.5%-30.3% and 3.6%-24.8% in early and late sowing respectively.【Conclusion】 Under the conditions of plastic film mulching and suitable sowing, upland rice is the best cultivation mode for its growth, nutrient uptake and yield.

Key words: upland rice; sowing date; plastic film mulching; nutrient uptake; yield

中图分类号:

S511

范晓芳, 索常凯, 褚璇, 王露霞, 冶军, 窦浩, 王蔚铭. 播期及覆膜处理对旱稻养分吸收和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(3): 412-418.

FAN Xiaofang, SUO Changkai, CHU Xuan, WANG Luxia, YE Jun, DOU Hao, WANG Yuming. Effects of Sowing Dates and Plastic Film Mulching on Nutrient Uptake and Yield of Upland Rice[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(3): 412-418.

参考文献

[1] 李云武.提高水稻光能利用率促进水稻高产[J].四川农业科技, 2011,(2):12-13.
LI Yunwu.Improving the utilization ratio of light energy and promoting high yield of rice [J].Sichuan Agricultural Science and Technology, 2011,(2):12-13.
[2] 艾福中.节水抗旱稻品种适应性及高产栽培技术研究与示范[D].武汉:华中农业大学, 2013.
AI Fuzhong.Studies on adaptability and high-yielding cultivation techniques of water-saving and drought-resistant Rice varieties and demonstration [D].Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2013.
[3] 张晓亚.浅谈我国旱稻的生产发展[J].河南农业, 2018,(4):31.
ZHANG Xiaoya.Discussion on the development of upland rice production in China [J].Henan Agriculture, 2018,(4):31.
[4] 马国胜, 薛吉全, 路海东, 等.播种时期与密度对关中灌区夏玉米群体生理指标的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2007,(6):1247-1253.
MA Guosheng, XUE Jiquan, LU Haidong, et al.Effects of sowing time and density on physiological indexes of summer maize population in Guanzhong Irrigation Area[J].Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007,(6):1247-1253.
[5] Anapalli SS, Ma L, Nielsen DC, et al.Simulating planting date effects on corn production using RZWQM and CERES-Maize model [J].Agronomy Journal, 2005, 97:58-71.
[6] 武艳芍,郝建平.不同播期对玉米(强盛49)出苗速度及生育期的影响[J].中国农学通报, 2009,25(4):119-121.
WU Yanshao, HAO Jianping.Effects of different sowing dates on emergence speed and growth period of maize Qiangsheng 49[J].Bulletin of Chinese Agronomy, 2009, 25(4):119-121.
[7] 李宁, 翟志席, 李建民, 等.播期与密度组合对夏玉米群体源库关系及冠层透光率的影响[J].中国生态农业学报, 2010,18(5):959-964.
LI Ning, ZHAI Zhixi, LI Jianming, et al.Effects of sowing date and density combination on source-sink relationship and canopy light transmittance of summer maize[J].Chinese Journal of Ecological Agriculture, 2010, 18(5):959-964.
[8] 李俊红, 丁志强, 王育红, 等.播种期对洛稻998生长发育动态及产量的影响[J].作物研究, 2008,(3):151-153.
LI Junhong, DING Zhiqiang, WANG Yuhong, et al.Effect of sowing date on growth and yield of Luodao 998 [J].Crop Research, 2008,(3):151-153.
[9] 薛昌颖, 杨晓光, 陈怀亮, 等.基于ORYZA2000模型的北京地区旱稻适宜播种期分析[J].生态学报, 2010,30(24):6970-6979.
XUE Changying, YANG Xiaoguang, CHEN Huailiang, et al.Analysis of suitable sowing date of upland rice in Beijing area based on Oryza 2000 Model [J].Journal of Ecology, 2010,30(24):6970-6979.
[10] 刘忠良, 刘岩, 毕振宇, 等.文登区不同播期对旱稻生长及产量的影响[J].农业科技通讯, 2018,(5):161-163.
LIU Zhongliang, LIU Yan, BI Zhenyu, et al.Effects of different sowing dates on growth and yield of upland rice in Wendeng Area [J].Agricultural Science and Technology Newsletter, 2018,(5):161-163.
[11] Chakraborty D, Nagarajan S, Aggarwal P, et al.Effect of mulching on soil and plant water status, and the growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in a semi-arid environment[J].Agricultural Water Management, 2008, 95 (12):1323-1334.
[12] 柴守玺,杨长刚,张淑芳,等.不同覆膜方式对旱地冬小麦土壤水分和产量的影响.作物学报, 2015,41(5):787-796.
CHAI Shouxi, YANG Changgang, ZHANG Shufang, et al.Effects of different film mulching methods on soil moisture and yield of winter wheat in dryland[J].Journal of Crop Science, 2015, 41(5):787-796.
[13] 刘成启, 孙东升, 佟斌.浅谈旱稻覆膜栽培技术[J].黑龙江农业科学, 2008,(4):148-149.
LIU Chengqi, SUN Dongsheng, TONG Bin.A brief talk on the cultivation technique of film mulching of Upland Rice [J].Agricultural Sciences of Heilongjiang, 2008,(4):148-149.
[14] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析(第3版)[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2000.
BAO Shidan.Soil agrochemical analysis (3rd edition) [M].Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000.
[15] Zhao H, Xiong Y C, Li F M, et al.Plastic film mulch for half growing season maximized WUE and yield of potato via moisture temperature improvement in a semi-aridagroeco system [J].Agricultural Water Management, 2012, 104:68-78.
[16] 郭江.高垄滴灌覆膜栽培水肥一体化技术要点[J].中国农业信息,2016,(16):106.
GUO Jiang.Key points of water and fertilizer integration technology for High Ridge drip irrigation and plastic film Mulching [J].Agricultural Information of China, 2016,(16):106.
[17] 李威, 李可, 魏长宾, 等.露地覆膜对华南地区冬季茄子营养吸收的影响[J].中国瓜菜, 2019,32(12):52-56.
LI Wei, LI Ke, WEI Changbin, et al.Effects of plastic film mulching on nutrient uptake of eggplant in winter in south China[J].Chinese Melon and Vegetable, 2019, 32(12):52-56.
[18] 李世清, 李凤民, 宋秋华, 等.半干旱地区不同地膜覆盖时期对土壤氮素有效性的影响[J].生态学报, 2001,(9):1519-1526.
LI Shiqing, LI Fengmin, SONG Qiuhua, et al.Effects of different plastic film mulching periods on soil nitrogen availability in semi-arid area[J].Journal of Ecology, 2001,(9):1519-1526.
[19] 黄福心.不同播期下机直播稻群体特性及产量表现[J].上海农业科技, 2019,(6):50-52.
HUANG Fuxin.Population characteristics and yield performance of direct-seeding rice under different sowing dates [J].Shanghai Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019,(6):50-52.
[20] 金旭生, 张璟秋, 羊彬.不同播期对水直播稻株型及产量构成的影响[J].上海农业科技, 2019,(6):52-53,55.
JIN Xusheng, ZHANG Jingqiu, YANG Bin.Effects of different sowing periods on the composition of rice plant type and yield in water [J].Shanghai Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019,(6): 52-53,55.
[21] 段里成, 郭瑞鸽, 张坤, 等.不同播期对直播早稻干物质积累的影响[J].作物杂志, 2019,(5):186-191.
DUAN Licheng, GUO Ruige, ZHANG Kun, et al.Effects of different sowing dates on dry matter accumulation of direct-seeding early rice [J].Crop Magazine, 2019,(5):186-191.

播期及覆膜处理对旱稻养分吸收和产量的影响

Effects of Sowing Dates and Plastic Film Mulching on Nutrient Uptake and Yield of Upland Rice

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	陈茂光, 林涛, 张昊, 刘海军, 王一帆, 汤秋香. 地膜类型对棉花生长的影响及自身降解和回收特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108.
[2]	杨国江, 陈云, 林祥群, 何江勇, 刘盛林, 曲永清. 氮肥减施下有机肥替代对滴灌棉花产量、氮素吸收利用及土壤硝态氮的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145.
[3]	陈传信, 张永强, 聂石辉, 孔德鹏, 赛力汗·赛, 徐其江, 雷钧杰. 生物质炭施用量对滴灌冬小麦生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2146-2151.
[4]	王立红, 张宏芝, 张跃强, 李剑峰, 王重, 高新, 时佳, 王春生, 夏建强, 樊哲儒. 不同产量水平冬小麦产量差异形成的干物质生产、转运及氮肥利用分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2152-2162.
[5]	王晓雨, 王小平, 史文宇, 刘美艳, 马健, 郭云鹏, 宋瑞欣, 王清涛. 拔节期冬小麦光合特性、干物质积累和产量对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2163-2172.
[6]	向莉, 王仙, 董裕生, 郭小玲, 方伏荣, 陈智军, 马艳明, 苗雨. 外源丁酸对干旱胁迫下大麦产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2173-2181.
[7]	杨红梅, 张跃强, 史应武, 吾买尔江·库尔班, 林青, 王宁, 楚敏, 曾军. 不同类型叶面肥喷施对冬小麦籽粒产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2182-2188.
[8]	马明杰, 赵经华, 李冬民, 杨胜春, 王克贤, 李池. 不同灌溉方式对苜蓿土壤水分与灌溉水利用效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2306-2313.
[9]	王心, 林涛, 崔建平, 吴凤全, 唐志轩, 崔来园, 郭仁松, 王亮, 郑子漂. 种植模式与灌溉定额对机采长绒棉产量及纤维品质形成的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1821-1829.
[10]	董艳雪, 贾永红, 张金汕, 李丹丹, 王凯, 罗四维, 王润琪, 石书兵. 不同生态区环境下春小麦干物质积累及产量形成分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1848-1857.
[11]	李怀胜, 艾洪玉, 孟玲, 王贺亚, 张磊, 艾海峰. 减氮下运筹养分吸收高峰期追施比例对春小麦的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1866-1872.
[12]	张超, 白云岗, 郑明, 肖军, 丁平. 极端干旱区葡萄水肥协同效应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1931-1939.
[13]	王挺, 张力, 张凡凡, 黄嵘峥, 李肖, 张玉琳, 陈永成, 赵建涛, 马春晖. 适合青贮的玉米品种生产性能筛选及营养价值评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1596-1605.
[14]	梁志国, 王泽鹏, 贾宋楠, 范凤翠, 刘胜尧, 张哲, 杜凤焕, 秦勇. 不同土壤水分对设施茄子生长、产量、品质及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1713-1721.
[15]	张永强, 陈传信, 徐其江, 聂石辉, 雷钧杰, 刘昌文. 氮肥增效剂与氮肥减量配施对冬小麦叶片生理及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1319-1325.