5种植物免疫诱导剂在黄瓜上应用效果

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.01.013

新疆农业科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (1): 107-114.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.01.013

• 植物保护·土壤肥料·贮藏保鲜加工·农业水土工程·微生物·农产品分析检测 • 上一篇下一篇

5种植物免疫诱导剂在黄瓜上应用效果

罗文芳, 何伟, 孙晓军, 许建军

新疆农业科学院植物保护研究所/农业部西北荒漠作物有害生物综合治理重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830091

收稿日期:2020-01-16 出版日期:2021-01-20 发布日期:2021-01-20
通信作者: 许建军(1972-),男,河南人,研究员,硕士,研究方向为蔬菜病虫害防治,(E-mail)xjj72@163.com
作者简介:罗文芳(1990-),女,河南人,助理研究员,硕士,研究方向为蔬菜病虫害防治,(E-mail)576263465@qq.com
基金资助:
自治区重点研发计划(2018B01002-1)

Study on the Application Effects of Five Plant Immune Inducers on Cucumber

LUO Wenfang, HE Wei, SUN Xiaojun, XU Jianjun

Key Laboratory of Integrated Crop Pest Management in Northwestern Oasis of China,Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Plant Protection,Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Urumqi 830091,China

Received:2020-01-16 Online:2021-01-20 Published:2021-01-20
Correspondence author: XU Jianjun(1972-), male,research fellow.master, Research area: Control of vegetables diseases and insect pests,(E-mail)xjj72@163.com
Supported by:
The Key R & D Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(2018B01002-1)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】 研究5种植物免疫诱导剂对黄瓜光合生理变化和抗病性的影响,为植物免疫诱导剂在黄瓜上应用提供科学依据。【方法】 采用盆栽试验,测定5种植物免疫诱导剂对黄瓜光合生理变化、抗病性和防御酶活性的影响。【结果】 那氏齐齐发诱导剂可提高叶绿素含量、促进黄瓜植株花期提前,产量相比对照提高3.5倍;植物免疫诱抗蛋白提高黄瓜植株光合性能,防治黄瓜白粉病效果达99.07%;蛋白免疫制剂提高了POD和CAT活性,是CK值的1.8和2.5倍,对黄瓜白粉病的防效为70.68%。【结论】 植物免疫诱抗蛋白和那氏齐齐发诱导剂可显著促进黄瓜增产且可提高黄瓜植株对白粉病抗病性,适宜在黄瓜生产中应用。

关键词: 植物免疫诱导剂; 黄瓜; 光合特性; 叶绿素荧光参数; 诱导抗病性; 防御酶

Abstract: 【Objective】 The effects of 5 kinds of plant immune inducers on the photosynthetic and physiological changes and disease resistance of the cucumber were determined, and the scientific basis was provided for the application of the plant immune inducers to the cucumber.【Method】 The effects of 5 kinds of plant immune inducers on the physiological and physiological changes, disease resistance and the activity of the defense enzymes were determined by pot experiment.【Result】 Nashi778 inducer could increase chlorophyll content and advance flowering stage of cucumber plants, and the yield was 3.5 times higher than that of the control.The photosynthetic performance of cucumber plants was improved by plant immune inducer protein, and the control effect of cucumber powdery mildew was 99.07%.The protein immune preparation increased the activities of POD and CAT, which was 1.8 and 2.5 times higher than the CK value, and the control effect on cucumber powdery mildew was 70.68%.【Conclusion】 The plant immune-induced protein and the Nashi778 inducer can obviously promote the yield of the cucumber, and can improve the disease resistance of the cucumber plant to the powdery mildew, and is suitable for application in the production of the cucumber.

Key words: plant immune inducer; cucumber; photosynthetic characteristics; chlorophyll fluorescence parameter; induced disease resistance; defense-related enzymes

中图分类号:

S642.2

罗文芳, 何伟, 孙晓军, 许建军. 5种植物免疫诱导剂在黄瓜上应用效果[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(1): 107-114.

LUO Wenfang, HE Wei, SUN Xiaojun, XU Jianjun. Study on the Application Effects of Five Plant Immune Inducers on Cucumber[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(1): 107-114.

参考文献

[1]邱德文.植物免疫诱抗剂的研究进展与应用前景[J].中国农业科技导报,2014,16(1):39-45.
QIU Dewen. Progress and prospect of plant immunity inducer [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology,2014,16(1): 39-45.
[2]WANG Guokun, ZHU Jiaqi, ZHANG Juntao, et al. Circulating micro RNA: a novel potential biomarker for early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in humans [J]. European Heart Journal, 2010, 31(6):659 - 666.
[3]盛世英,周强,邱德文,等.植物免疫蛋白制剂阿泰灵诱导小麦抗病增产效果及作用机制[J].中国生物防治学报,2017,33(2): 213-218.
SHENG Shiying, ZHOU Qiang, QIU Dewen, et al. Effects and mechanism of disease resistance and yield improvement induced by plant immune protein preparation Atailing in wheat[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2017,33(2):213-218.
[4]郭芳,王亚军,谢忠奎,等.诱抗剂对切花百合生长·抗病性及相关酶活性的影响[J].园艺学报,2010,37 (5):763-768.
GUO Fang, WANG Yajun, XIE Zhongkui, et al. The effects of inducers on growth, disease resistance and related enzymes activities of lily cut flower [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2010, 37 (5):763-768.
[5]李少波,石延霞,刘君丽,等. 4种诱抗剂诱导番茄抗晚疫病的初步效果[J].中国蔬菜,2013,(12):49-54.
LI Shaobo, SHI Yanxia, LIU Junli, et al. Preliminary effects of 4 resistance inducers on tomato resistance to late blight [J]. China Vegetables, 2013,(12):49-54.
[6]吕金慧,安娜,陈萍.海岛素在植物中的应用研究进展[J].绿色科技,2017,1(1):15-17.
LÜ Jinhui, AN Na, CHEN Ping. Research advances in application of amino oligosaccharide in plants [J]. Journal of Green Science and Technology, 2017, 1(1):15-17.
[7]郑剑超,智雪萍,董飞.植物诱导剂对黄瓜基质穴盘苗生长的影响[J].北方园艺,2017,(2): 44-46.
ZHENG Jianchao, ZHI Xueping, DONG Fei. Effects of plant inducer on growth of cucumber matrix plug seedling [J]. Northern Horticulture, 2017,(2): 44-46.
[8]Dang J L, Jones J D G. Plant pathogens and integrated defense responses to infection[J]. Nature, 2001, 411:826-833.
[9]Asai T., Tena G., Plonikova J., et al. MAP kinase signaling cascade in arabidopsis innate immunity [J]. Nature, 2002, 415:977-983.
[10]张守仁.叶绿素荧光动力学参数的意义及讨论[J].植物学通报,1999,16(4):444-448.
ZHANG Shouren. A discussion on chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics parameters and their significance [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 1999, 16(4):444-448.
[11]Wang D., Liu Y., Tan X., et al. Effect of exogenous nitric oxide on antioxidative system and snitrosylation in leaves of Boehmerianivea (L.) Gaud under cadmium stress [J]. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2015, 22 (5):3489-3497.
[12]Wang LZ, Wang LM, Xiang HT, et al. Relationship of photosynthetic efficiency and seed-setting rate in two contrasting rice cultivars under chilling stress [J]. Photosynthetica, 2016, 54 (4):581-588.
[13]Zheng YL, Li WQ, Sun WB. Effects of acclimation and pretreatment with abscisic acid or salicylic acid on tolerance of Trigonobalanus doichangensis to extreme temperatures [J]. Biologia Plantarum, 2015, 59(2): 382-388.
[14]郭珍,葛波,韩美丽,等.根肿菌侵染油菜抗感病品种早期防御酶活性及转录组分析[J].植物保护学报,2018,45(2):290-298.
GUO Zhen, GE Bo, HAN Meili, et al. Analysis of defense enzyme activities and transcriptome of clubroot-resistant and susceptible in canola to clubroot pathogen Plasmodiophorabrassicae during early infection [J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 2018, 45(2):290-298.
[15]陈艳光,尹淑丽,刘洪伟,等.枯草芽孢杆菌BSD-2诱导黄瓜抗灰霉病的作用研究[J].北方园艺,2016,(12): 119-123.
CHEN Yanguang, YIN Shuli, LIU Hongwei, et al. Induced resistance of cucumber against botrytis cinereaby Bacillus subtilis BSD-2[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2016,(12): 119-123.
[16]甄丹妹,郭景红,韩兴,等.玫瑰黄链霉菌活性代谢产物诱导黄瓜白粉病抗性[J].江苏农业科学,2019,47(11):148-150.
ZHEN Danmei, GUO Jinghong, HAN Xing, et al. Induced resistance of active metabolites of Streptomyces roseoflavus against cucumber powdery mildew [J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(11):148-150.

5种植物免疫诱导剂在黄瓜上应用效果

Study on the Application Effects of Five Plant Immune Inducers on Cucumber

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	王晓雨, 王小平, 史文宇, 刘美艳, 马健, 郭云鹏, 宋瑞欣, 王清涛. 拔节期冬小麦光合特性、干物质积累和产量对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2163-2172.
[2]	韩守安, 王敏, 麦合木提·图如普, 谢辉, 艾尔买克·才卡斯木, 刘佳乐, 张雯, 潘明启. 不同光质处理对赤霞珠葡萄叶片光合特性及果实品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1894-1903.
[3]	朱学慧, 张雯, 马云龙, 何鹏飞, 韩守安, 王敏, 田嘉, 谢辉. 不同生态环境下葡萄光合特性差异性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1913-1921.
[4]	马新超, 轩正英, 闵昊哲, 齐志文, 成宏宇, 谭占明, 王旭峰. 水氮耦合对沙培黄瓜光合日变化及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1966-1974.
[5]	汤东, 安玉光, 程平, 李宏, 杨建军, 王凯. 天山北坡前山带典型灌木光合特性对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1531-1539.
[6]	申莹莹, 张巨松, 彭增莹, 段松江, 李宗润, 吴一帆. 缩节胺复配打顶剂对机采棉冠层结构、光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1110-1117.
[7]	丁宇, 张江辉, 白云岗, 刘洪波, 郑明, 赵经华, 肖军, 韩政宇. 双膜条件下不同干播湿出水分处理对棉花生理、生长特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 810-822.
[8]	吕齐, 蒋宇, 赵丰云, 雷叶, 于坤, 姚东东, 李旭娇, 沙日叶, 王芳霞. 施加生物炭对盐胁迫下无花果生物量叶绿素荧光参数及离子分配的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(3): 574-581.
[9]	阿布来克·尼牙孜, 章世奎, 王绍鹏, 王亚铜, 樊国全. 根域限制栽培对库尔勒香梨光合、荧光特性及果实品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(2): 344-350.
[10]	秦国礼, 王为然, 王萌, 杨静, 黄幸磊, 刘志清, 朱家辉, 阿里甫·艾尔西, 孔杰, 陈国栋. 草甘膦对海岛棉农艺性状及光合作用的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 2861-2868.
[11]	马媛媛, 李刚, 何旺, 赵宝龙, 鲁倩君, 陈丽靓, 刘迎. 外源褪黑素对NaCl胁迫下草莓幼苗生理特性的缓解效应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2486-2495.
[12]	户金鸽, 白世践, 陈光, 蔡军社. 15个葡萄砧木耐热性差异评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 86-95.
[13]	摆虹霞, 张亚红, 马小连, 黄嘉俊. 灌水频率和灌水量对温室黄瓜产量、品质及灌溉水利用效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(9): 2136-2146.
[14]	韩毅, 赵宝龙, 孙军利, 赵书成. 新疆桃实生优选单株叶片性状及光合特性日变化[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(9): 2170-2178.
[15]	史开奇, 王和平, 李斌, 程勇, 杨建军, 程平. 不同引进白蜡品种光合日变化[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(7): 1708-1715.