新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (1): 86-95.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.01.011
收稿日期:
2022-05-10
出版日期:
2023-01-20
发布日期:
2023-03-07
通信作者:
户金鸽(1982-),女,新疆人,副研究员,研究方向为葡萄栽培,(E-mail)hujinge2007@sina.com
基金资助:
HU Jinge(), BAI Shijian, CHEN Guang, CAI Junshe
Received:
2022-05-10
Online:
2023-01-20
Published:
2023-03-07
Correspondence author:
HU Jinge(1982-),female,Xinjiang,research associate,research area:viticulturo,(E-mail)hujinge2007@sina.com
Supported by:
摘要:
【目的】研究15个葡萄砧木品种新梢的生长及叶片叶绿素荧光参数对高温的响应,评价其耐热性的差异性,筛选出耐热性较强的砧木,为砧木的耐热性选择提供理论依据。【方法】在吐鲁番自然高温条件下,研究15个葡萄砧木品种在田间高温下的生长情况并测定叶片的荧光参数,利用隶属函数法分析评价其耐热性。【结果】在40℃高温气候条件下,110R和Fercal叶片卷曲,山河2号轻微卷曲,其它砧木均无卷曲,叶缘正常,叶片上无斑点;植株生长前期速率随温度升高而下降,后期生长速率平稳。15个砧木品种的耐热性分为6类。【结论】砧木山河2号的耐热性最强,140R最弱。
中图分类号:
户金鸽, 白世践, 陈光, 蔡军社. 15个葡萄砧木耐热性差异评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 86-95.
HU Jinge, BAI Shijian, CHEN Guang, CAI Junshe. Differential Evaluation of Heat Tolerance of 15 Grape Rootstocks[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(1): 86-95.
时间 Time (D/M) | 高于35℃ 时长 The length of time above 35℃(h) | 高于40℃ 时长 The length of time above 40℃(h) | 时间 Time (D/M) | 高于35℃ 时长 The length of time above 35℃(h) | 高于40℃ 时长 The length of time above 40℃(h) | 时间 Time (D/M) | 高于35℃ 时长 The length of time above 35℃(h) | 高于40℃ 时长 The length of time above 40℃(h) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1/6 | 8.5 | 4.0 | 1/7 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 1/8 | 7.0 | 0.0 |
2/6 | 9.0 | 6.0 | 2/7 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 2/8 | 8.0 | 2.5 |
3/6 | 9.5 | 6.0 | 3/7 | 7.5 | 2.5 | 3/8 | 5.0 | 2.0 |
4/6 | 8.0 | 0.5 | 4/7 | 8.0 | 3.5 | 4/8 | 8.5 | 6.0 |
5/6 | 8.0 | 0.5 | 5/7 | 7.5 | 3.5 | 5/8 | 9.0 | 6.5 |
6/6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6/7 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 6/8 | 9.0 | 5.5 |
7/6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7/7 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 7/8 | 9.5 | 7.0 |
8/6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8/7 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 8/8 | 8.0. | 4.5 |
9/6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9/7 | 6.5 | 0.0 | 9/8 | 7.0 | 0.0 |
10/6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 10/7 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 10/8 | 3.0 | 0.0 |
11/6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 11/7 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 11/8 | 5.0 | 0.0 |
12/6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 12/7 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 12/8 | 5.0 | 0.0 |
13/6 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 13/7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 13/8 | 5.0 | 0.0 |
14/6 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 14/7 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 14/8 | 2.0 | 0.0 |
15/6 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 15/7 | 6.5 | 0.5 | 15/8 | 1.0 | 0.0 |
16/6 | 7.5 | 0.0 | 16/7 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 16/8 | 3.5 | 0.0 |
17/6 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 17/7 | 8.5 | 5.5 | 17/8 | 4.5 | 0.0 |
18/6 | 6.5 | 0.0 | 18/7 | 8.5 | 6.0 | 18/8 | 7.0 | 0.0 |
19/6 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 19/7 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 19/8 | 4.5 | 0.0 |
20/6 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 20/7 | 7.5 | 5.0 | 20/8 | 3.5 | 0.0 |
21/6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 21/7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 21/8 | 5.5 | 0.0 |
22/6 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 22/7 | 7.5 | 0.5 | 22/8 | 3.0 | 0.0 |
23/6 | 7.5 | 0.0 | 23/7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 23/8 | 3.5 | 0.0 |
24/6 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 24/7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 24/8 | 7.0 | 40 |
25/6 | 7.5 | 3.0 | 25/7 | 8.0 | 4.5 | 25/8 | 8.5 | 5.5 |
26/6 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 26/7 | 8.0 | 5.5 | 26/8 | 6.0 | 2.0 |
27/6 | 6.5 | 0.0 | 27/7 | 8.5 | 3.0 | 27/8 | 4.5 | 0.0 |
28/6 | 8.5 | 0.0 | 28/7 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 28/8 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
29/6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 29/7 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 29/8 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
30/6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 30/7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 30/8 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
31/7 | 6.5 | 0.0 | 31/8 | 2.5 | 0.0 |
表1 葡萄试验园6~8月间高于35℃和40℃的气温时长变化
Table 1 The length of time above 35℃ and 40℃ from June to August in vineyard
时间 Time (D/M) | 高于35℃ 时长 The length of time above 35℃(h) | 高于40℃ 时长 The length of time above 40℃(h) | 时间 Time (D/M) | 高于35℃ 时长 The length of time above 35℃(h) | 高于40℃ 时长 The length of time above 40℃(h) | 时间 Time (D/M) | 高于35℃ 时长 The length of time above 35℃(h) | 高于40℃ 时长 The length of time above 40℃(h) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1/6 | 8.5 | 4.0 | 1/7 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 1/8 | 7.0 | 0.0 |
2/6 | 9.0 | 6.0 | 2/7 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 2/8 | 8.0 | 2.5 |
3/6 | 9.5 | 6.0 | 3/7 | 7.5 | 2.5 | 3/8 | 5.0 | 2.0 |
4/6 | 8.0 | 0.5 | 4/7 | 8.0 | 3.5 | 4/8 | 8.5 | 6.0 |
5/6 | 8.0 | 0.5 | 5/7 | 7.5 | 3.5 | 5/8 | 9.0 | 6.5 |
6/6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6/7 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 6/8 | 9.0 | 5.5 |
7/6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7/7 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 7/8 | 9.5 | 7.0 |
8/6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8/7 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 8/8 | 8.0. | 4.5 |
9/6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9/7 | 6.5 | 0.0 | 9/8 | 7.0 | 0.0 |
10/6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 10/7 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 10/8 | 3.0 | 0.0 |
11/6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 11/7 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 11/8 | 5.0 | 0.0 |
12/6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 12/7 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 12/8 | 5.0 | 0.0 |
13/6 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 13/7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 13/8 | 5.0 | 0.0 |
14/6 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 14/7 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 14/8 | 2.0 | 0.0 |
15/6 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 15/7 | 6.5 | 0.5 | 15/8 | 1.0 | 0.0 |
16/6 | 7.5 | 0.0 | 16/7 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 16/8 | 3.5 | 0.0 |
17/6 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 17/7 | 8.5 | 5.5 | 17/8 | 4.5 | 0.0 |
18/6 | 6.5 | 0.0 | 18/7 | 8.5 | 6.0 | 18/8 | 7.0 | 0.0 |
19/6 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 19/7 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 19/8 | 4.5 | 0.0 |
20/6 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 20/7 | 7.5 | 5.0 | 20/8 | 3.5 | 0.0 |
21/6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 21/7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 21/8 | 5.5 | 0.0 |
22/6 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 22/7 | 7.5 | 0.5 | 22/8 | 3.0 | 0.0 |
23/6 | 7.5 | 0.0 | 23/7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 23/8 | 3.5 | 0.0 |
24/6 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 24/7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 24/8 | 7.0 | 40 |
25/6 | 7.5 | 3.0 | 25/7 | 8.0 | 4.5 | 25/8 | 8.5 | 5.5 |
26/6 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 26/7 | 8.0 | 5.5 | 26/8 | 6.0 | 2.0 |
27/6 | 6.5 | 0.0 | 27/7 | 8.5 | 3.0 | 27/8 | 4.5 | 0.0 |
28/6 | 8.5 | 0.0 | 28/7 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 28/8 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
29/6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 29/7 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 29/8 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
30/6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 30/7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 30/8 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
31/7 | 6.5 | 0.0 | 31/8 | 2.5 | 0.0 |
品种 Cultivar | 颜色 Color | 叶片状态 Status |
---|---|---|
贝达Beta | 黄绿 | 平整 |
5BB | 黄绿 | 平整 |
101-14 | 绿 | 平整 |
110R | 绿 | 卷曲 |
188-08 | 绿 | 平整 |
1103P | 墨绿 | 平整 |
京3309 Jing 3309 | 绿 | 平整 |
140R | 绿 | 平整 |
Valiant | 黄绿 | 平整 |
山河2号 Shanhe 2 | 黄绿 | 卷曲 |
BR No.2 | 绿 | 平整 |
Du Lot | 绿 | 平整 |
Fercal | 墨绿 | 卷曲 |
5C | 绿 | 平整 |
SO4 | 绿 | 平整 |
表2 高温下不同葡萄砧木品种的叶片形态
Table 2 The leaf morphology of different grape root stock cultivars under high temperature condition
品种 Cultivar | 颜色 Color | 叶片状态 Status |
---|---|---|
贝达Beta | 黄绿 | 平整 |
5BB | 黄绿 | 平整 |
101-14 | 绿 | 平整 |
110R | 绿 | 卷曲 |
188-08 | 绿 | 平整 |
1103P | 墨绿 | 平整 |
京3309 Jing 3309 | 绿 | 平整 |
140R | 绿 | 平整 |
Valiant | 黄绿 | 平整 |
山河2号 Shanhe 2 | 黄绿 | 卷曲 |
BR No.2 | 绿 | 平整 |
Du Lot | 绿 | 平整 |
Fercal | 墨绿 | 卷曲 |
5C | 绿 | 平整 |
SO4 | 绿 | 平整 |
品种 Cultivar | 叶片中脉长Leaf lengh | 叶宽Leaf width | 茎粗Stem diameter | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25℃ | 40℃ | 25℃ | 40℃ | 25℃ | 40℃ | |
贝达 Beta | 11.53A | 10.40AB | 13.73A | 12.5AB | 4.18AB | 4.02AB |
5BB | 9.63ABC | 8.07CD | 10.93ABC | 9.67CDEF | 4.06B | 2.98BC |
101-14 | 8.10CDEFG | 7.00CD | 10.70BCD | 8.57EF | 3.46BCDE | 3.14BC |
110R | 8.57BCDE | 8.90BC | 10.30BCD | 11.17ABCD | 5.00A | 5.07A |
188-08 | 6.30G | 8.33CD | 8.87BCD | 9.50CDEF | 3.80BCD | 3.49BC |
1103P | 7.87CDEFG | 7.67CD | 10.23BCD | 9.03DEF | 3.50BCDE | 2.82C |
京3309 Jing 3309 | 7.17DEFG | 7.47CD | 9.67BCD | 9.07DEF | 3.17CDE | 3.62BC |
140R | 6.57FG | 6.83D | 8.07D | 8.17F | 3.74BCD | 3.91BC |
Viliant | 9.43BC | 8.77BCD | 11.10ABC | 11.00ABCDE | 3.93BC | 3.39BC |
山河2号Shanhe 2 | 10.20AB | 11.70A | 10.7BCD | 12.83A | 3.60BCDE | 3.44BC |
BR No.2 | 9.13BCD | 8.73BCD | 11.40AB | 11.67ABC | 3.93BC | 3.06BC |
Du Lot | 8.40BCDEF | 8.97BC | 9.70BCD | 9.57CDEF | 3.50BCDE | 3.23BC |
Fercal | 7.37DEFG | 7.33CD | 8.30CD | 8.37F | 2.80E | 3.37BC |
5C | 8.10CDEFG | 8.60BCD | 10.27BCD | 10.23BCDEF | 3.07DE | 3.83BC |
SO4 | 7.07EFG | 8.73BCD | 9.33BCD | 9.93CDEF | 3.39BCDE | 3.56BC |
表3 高温下葡萄砧木叶片中脉长、宽、径粗变化
Table 3 Leaf length,leaf width,leaf area,stem diameter of grape rootstock under high temperature
品种 Cultivar | 叶片中脉长Leaf lengh | 叶宽Leaf width | 茎粗Stem diameter | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25℃ | 40℃ | 25℃ | 40℃ | 25℃ | 40℃ | |
贝达 Beta | 11.53A | 10.40AB | 13.73A | 12.5AB | 4.18AB | 4.02AB |
5BB | 9.63ABC | 8.07CD | 10.93ABC | 9.67CDEF | 4.06B | 2.98BC |
101-14 | 8.10CDEFG | 7.00CD | 10.70BCD | 8.57EF | 3.46BCDE | 3.14BC |
110R | 8.57BCDE | 8.90BC | 10.30BCD | 11.17ABCD | 5.00A | 5.07A |
188-08 | 6.30G | 8.33CD | 8.87BCD | 9.50CDEF | 3.80BCD | 3.49BC |
1103P | 7.87CDEFG | 7.67CD | 10.23BCD | 9.03DEF | 3.50BCDE | 2.82C |
京3309 Jing 3309 | 7.17DEFG | 7.47CD | 9.67BCD | 9.07DEF | 3.17CDE | 3.62BC |
140R | 6.57FG | 6.83D | 8.07D | 8.17F | 3.74BCD | 3.91BC |
Viliant | 9.43BC | 8.77BCD | 11.10ABC | 11.00ABCDE | 3.93BC | 3.39BC |
山河2号Shanhe 2 | 10.20AB | 11.70A | 10.7BCD | 12.83A | 3.60BCDE | 3.44BC |
BR No.2 | 9.13BCD | 8.73BCD | 11.40AB | 11.67ABC | 3.93BC | 3.06BC |
Du Lot | 8.40BCDEF | 8.97BC | 9.70BCD | 9.57CDEF | 3.50BCDE | 3.23BC |
Fercal | 7.37DEFG | 7.33CD | 8.30CD | 8.37F | 2.80E | 3.37BC |
5C | 8.10CDEFG | 8.60BCD | 10.27BCD | 10.23BCDEF | 3.07DE | 3.83BC |
SO4 | 7.07EFG | 8.73BCD | 9.33BCD | 9.93CDEF | 3.39BCDE | 3.56BC |
砧木品种 Cultivar | 植株基部 5 cm径粗 Stem thick at 5 cm (mm) | 当年枝条成 熟长度 Length of mature branches in 2020 (cm) | 当年枝条成 熟节数(节) Mature section number in 2020 | 当年枝条未成 熟长度 Length of immature branches in 2020 (cm) | 当年枝条未成 熟节数(节) Immature section number in 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
贝达 Beta | 12.66 | 210.11 | 35.7 | 42.44 | 10.8 |
5BB | 12.12 | 336.13 | 39.9 | 120.75 | 18.0 |
SO4 | 11.76 | 180.11 | 33.1 | 77.78 | 15.9 |
101-14 | 10.08 | 175.75 | 33.8 | 85.13 | 16.8 |
110R | 15.75 | 347.43 | 37.3 | 119.71 | 17.3 |
188-08 | 14.46 | 287.00 | 41.7 | 109.55 | 21.6 |
1103P | 26.12 | 432.29 | 58.6 | 147.00 | 22.9 |
京3309 Jing 3309 | 14.33 | 257.38 | 41.0 | 117.75 | 23.8 |
140R | 19.39 | 363.30 | 49.9 | 125.89 | 22.7 |
Valliant | 15.82 | 319.44 | 53.6 | 23.89 | 7.6 |
山河2号Shanhe 2 | 14.72 | 431.00 | 51.7 | 94.90 | 16.2 |
BR No.2 | 10.69 | 273.75 | 42.4 | 78.63 | 15.6 |
Du Lot | 10.28 | 237.83 | 36.0 | 90.00 | 15.5 |
Fercal | 14.17 | 324.50 | 47.2 | 136.67 | 19.7 |
5C | 12.17 | 314.00 | 41.0 | 121.00 | 17.9 |
表4 葡萄砧木品种田间生长变化
Table 4 Root stock growth in the field
砧木品种 Cultivar | 植株基部 5 cm径粗 Stem thick at 5 cm (mm) | 当年枝条成 熟长度 Length of mature branches in 2020 (cm) | 当年枝条成 熟节数(节) Mature section number in 2020 | 当年枝条未成 熟长度 Length of immature branches in 2020 (cm) | 当年枝条未成 熟节数(节) Immature section number in 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
贝达 Beta | 12.66 | 210.11 | 35.7 | 42.44 | 10.8 |
5BB | 12.12 | 336.13 | 39.9 | 120.75 | 18.0 |
SO4 | 11.76 | 180.11 | 33.1 | 77.78 | 15.9 |
101-14 | 10.08 | 175.75 | 33.8 | 85.13 | 16.8 |
110R | 15.75 | 347.43 | 37.3 | 119.71 | 17.3 |
188-08 | 14.46 | 287.00 | 41.7 | 109.55 | 21.6 |
1103P | 26.12 | 432.29 | 58.6 | 147.00 | 22.9 |
京3309 Jing 3309 | 14.33 | 257.38 | 41.0 | 117.75 | 23.8 |
140R | 19.39 | 363.30 | 49.9 | 125.89 | 22.7 |
Valliant | 15.82 | 319.44 | 53.6 | 23.89 | 7.6 |
山河2号Shanhe 2 | 14.72 | 431.00 | 51.7 | 94.90 | 16.2 |
BR No.2 | 10.69 | 273.75 | 42.4 | 78.63 | 15.6 |
Du Lot | 10.28 | 237.83 | 36.0 | 90.00 | 15.5 |
Fercal | 14.17 | 324.50 | 47.2 | 136.67 | 19.7 |
5C | 12.17 | 314.00 | 41.0 | 121.00 | 17.9 |
品种 Cultivar | Fo | Fm | Fv/Fo | Fv/Fm |
---|---|---|---|---|
贝达Beta | 313.70±10.76ABC | 517.33±72.11ABCD | 0.64±0.18CD | 0.38±0.07BC |
5BB | 331.37±20.66ABC | 637.33±111.59ABCD | 0.91±0.22ABCD | 0.47±0.06ABC |
101-14 | 319.17±10.88ABC | 646.73±6.62ABCD | 1.03±0.05ABCD | 0.51±0.01ABC |
110R | 313.30±20.90ABC | 502.87±59.23BCD | 0.60±0.09D | 0.37±0.04BC |
188-08 | 291.10±24.11ABC | 544.93±116.14ABCD | 0.85±0.27ABCD | 0.45±0.08ABC |
1103P | 328.00±21.37ABC | 634.73±78.72ABCD | 0.93±0.13ABCD | 0.48±0.03ABC |
京3309 Jing 3309 | 325.50±37.14ABC | 691.20±174.95ABC | 1.10±0.33ABC | 0.51±0.08AB |
140R | 286.70±52.37BC | 484.47±173.54CD | 0.64±0.28CD | 0.37±0.10BC |
Viliant | 302.00±15.72ABC | 580.07±63.78ABCD | 0.92±0.11ABCD | 0.48±0.03ABC |
山河2号 Shanhe 2 | 342.37±5.76AB | 753.40±26.37A | 1.20±0.05A | 0.55±0.01A |
BR No.2 | 278.43±11.31C | 445.13±43.37D | 0.60±0.11D | 0.37±0.04C |
Du Lot | 335.93±3.33ABC | 623.07±33.40ABCD | 0.85±0.08ABCD | 0.46±0.03ABC |
Fercal | 346.20±4.51A | 736.93±56.58AB | 1.13±0.15AB | 0.53±0.03A |
5C | 324.30±9.04ABC | 567.53±51.18ABCD | 0.75±0.11ABCD | 0.43±0.03ABC |
SO4 | 321.13±4.65ABC | 555.00±18.64ABCD | 0.73±0.04BCD | 0.42±0.01ABC |
表5 葡萄砧木品种Fo、Fm、Fv/Fo、Fv/Fm下高温响应变化
Table 5 Response of Fo,Fm, Fv/Fo, Fv/Fm of different grape cultivars to high temperature
品种 Cultivar | Fo | Fm | Fv/Fo | Fv/Fm |
---|---|---|---|---|
贝达Beta | 313.70±10.76ABC | 517.33±72.11ABCD | 0.64±0.18CD | 0.38±0.07BC |
5BB | 331.37±20.66ABC | 637.33±111.59ABCD | 0.91±0.22ABCD | 0.47±0.06ABC |
101-14 | 319.17±10.88ABC | 646.73±6.62ABCD | 1.03±0.05ABCD | 0.51±0.01ABC |
110R | 313.30±20.90ABC | 502.87±59.23BCD | 0.60±0.09D | 0.37±0.04BC |
188-08 | 291.10±24.11ABC | 544.93±116.14ABCD | 0.85±0.27ABCD | 0.45±0.08ABC |
1103P | 328.00±21.37ABC | 634.73±78.72ABCD | 0.93±0.13ABCD | 0.48±0.03ABC |
京3309 Jing 3309 | 325.50±37.14ABC | 691.20±174.95ABC | 1.10±0.33ABC | 0.51±0.08AB |
140R | 286.70±52.37BC | 484.47±173.54CD | 0.64±0.28CD | 0.37±0.10BC |
Viliant | 302.00±15.72ABC | 580.07±63.78ABCD | 0.92±0.11ABCD | 0.48±0.03ABC |
山河2号 Shanhe 2 | 342.37±5.76AB | 753.40±26.37A | 1.20±0.05A | 0.55±0.01A |
BR No.2 | 278.43±11.31C | 445.13±43.37D | 0.60±0.11D | 0.37±0.04C |
Du Lot | 335.93±3.33ABC | 623.07±33.40ABCD | 0.85±0.08ABCD | 0.46±0.03ABC |
Fercal | 346.20±4.51A | 736.93±56.58AB | 1.13±0.15AB | 0.53±0.03A |
5C | 324.30±9.04ABC | 567.53±51.18ABCD | 0.75±0.11ABCD | 0.43±0.03ABC |
SO4 | 321.13±4.65ABC | 555.00±18.64ABCD | 0.73±0.04BCD | 0.42±0.01ABC |
品种 Cultivar | 综合值 Comprehensive evaluation | 排名 Rank | 耐热性 Heat tolerance | 品种 Cultivar | 综合值 Comprehensive evaluation | 排名Rank | 耐热性 Heat tolerance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
贝达Beta | 1.268 | 13 | 极弱 | Viliant | 1.904 | 10 | 较弱 |
5BB | 2.572 | 4 | 较强 | 山河2号Shanhe 2 | 2.776 | 1 | 强 |
101-14 | 2.283 | 7 | 较强 | BR No.2 | 1.081 | 14 | 极弱 |
110R | 2.368 | 5 | 较强 | Du Lot | 2.118 | 8 | 中等 |
188-08 | 2.098 | 9 | 中等 | Fercal | 2.775 | 2 | 较强 |
1103P | 2.636 | 3 | 较强 | 5C | 1.672 | 11 | 弱 |
京3309 Jing 3309 | 2.293 | 6 | 较强 | SO4 | 1.473 | 12 | 极弱 |
140R | 1.096 | 15 | 极弱 |
表6 葡萄砧木耐热性的分析与评价
Table 6 Analysis and evaluation of heat tolerance of different grape root stock cultivars
品种 Cultivar | 综合值 Comprehensive evaluation | 排名 Rank | 耐热性 Heat tolerance | 品种 Cultivar | 综合值 Comprehensive evaluation | 排名Rank | 耐热性 Heat tolerance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
贝达Beta | 1.268 | 13 | 极弱 | Viliant | 1.904 | 10 | 较弱 |
5BB | 2.572 | 4 | 较强 | 山河2号Shanhe 2 | 2.776 | 1 | 强 |
101-14 | 2.283 | 7 | 较强 | BR No.2 | 1.081 | 14 | 极弱 |
110R | 2.368 | 5 | 较强 | Du Lot | 2.118 | 8 | 中等 |
188-08 | 2.098 | 9 | 中等 | Fercal | 2.775 | 2 | 较强 |
1103P | 2.636 | 3 | 较强 | 5C | 1.672 | 11 | 弱 |
京3309 Jing 3309 | 2.293 | 6 | 较强 | SO4 | 1.473 | 12 | 极弱 |
140R | 1.096 | 15 | 极弱 |
分类数 Cluster number | 误差函数 Error function | 最优分割结果 Optimal segmentation |
---|---|---|
2 | 4.222 | 1,2-15 |
3 | 3.319 3 | 1,2-7,8-15 |
4 | 2.648 9 | 1,2-7,8,9-15 |
5 | 2.203 7 | 1,2-7,8,9-13,14-15 |
6 | 1.524 8 | 1,2-7,8-9,10,11,12-15 |
7 | 0.761 0 | 1,2-7,8-9,10,11,12-13,14-15 |
8 | 0.434 5 | 1,2-7,8,9,10,11,12-13,14-15 |
9 | 0.218 7 | 1,2-7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14-15 |
10 | 0.172 1 | 1,2,3-7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14-15 |
11 | 0.116 7 | 1,2,3-5,6-7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14-15 |
12 | 0.057 9 | 1,2,3-5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14-15 |
13 | 0.023 4 | 1,2,3-4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14-15 |
14 | 0.003 6 | 1,2,3-4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 |
表7 不同分类数下的AR分类
Table 7 Classification results of AR under different cluster numbers
分类数 Cluster number | 误差函数 Error function | 最优分割结果 Optimal segmentation |
---|---|---|
2 | 4.222 | 1,2-15 |
3 | 3.319 3 | 1,2-7,8-15 |
4 | 2.648 9 | 1,2-7,8,9-15 |
5 | 2.203 7 | 1,2-7,8,9-13,14-15 |
6 | 1.524 8 | 1,2-7,8-9,10,11,12-15 |
7 | 0.761 0 | 1,2-7,8-9,10,11,12-13,14-15 |
8 | 0.434 5 | 1,2-7,8,9,10,11,12-13,14-15 |
9 | 0.218 7 | 1,2-7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14-15 |
10 | 0.172 1 | 1,2,3-7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14-15 |
11 | 0.116 7 | 1,2,3-5,6-7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14-15 |
12 | 0.057 9 | 1,2,3-5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14-15 |
13 | 0.023 4 | 1,2,3-4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14-15 |
14 | 0.003 6 | 1,2,3-4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 |
[1] | 贺普超. 葡萄学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社,1999. |
He Puchao. Vitis Culture[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press,1999. | |
[2] |
Lobell D B, Asner G P. Climate and management contributions to recent trends in U.S.agricultural yields[J]. Science, 2003, 299(5609):1032-1033.
DOI PMID |
[3] | 田婧, 郭世荣. 黄瓜的高温胁迫伤害及其耐热性研究进展[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2012,(18):43-52. |
TIAN Jing, GUO Shirong. Research for Progress on High-temperature Stress Injury and Heat Tolerance of Cucumber[J]. Chinese Vegetables, 2012,(18):43-52. | |
[4] | 张睿佳, 李瑛, 虞秀明, 等. 高温胁迫与外源油菜素内脂对‘巨峰’葡萄叶片光合特性生理与果实品质的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2015, 32(4):590-596. |
ZHANG Ruijia, LI Ying, YU Xiuming, et al. Effects of Heat Stress and Exogenous Brassinolide on Photosynthesis of Leaves and Berry Quality of ‘Kyoho’ grapevine[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2015, 32(4):590-596. | |
[5] |
查倩, 奚晓军, 蒋爱丽, 等. 高温条件下‘巨玫瑰’葡萄品种叶片表现,可溶性糖和叶绿素荧光特性的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(25):118-123.
DOI |
ZHA Qian, XI Xiaojun, JIANG Aili, et al. Study on Leaf Phenotype,Soluble Sugar and Chlrophy ⅡFluorescence Characteristics Response to Heat Stress in ‘Jumeigui’Grapes[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(25):118-123. | |
[6] | 徐洪国. 葡萄耐热性评价及不同耐热性葡萄转录组研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2014. |
XU Hongguo. Evaluation of Grape Heat Tolerance and Transcriptome of Didderent Heat Tolerance of Grape[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2014. | |
[7] | 吴久赟, 廉苇佳, 曾晓燕, 等. 不同品种葡萄对高温的生理响应及耐热性评价[J]. 西北植物学报, 2019, 39(6):1075-1084. |
WU Jiuyun, LIAN Weijia, ZENG Xiaoyan, et al. Physiological Response to High Temperature and Heat Tolerance Evaluation of Different Grape Cultivars[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2019, 39(6):1075-1084. | |
[8] | 肖芳. 高温胁迫对苗期红提葡萄生理及基因表达特性的影响[D]. 南京: 南京信息工程大学, 2018. |
XIAO Fang. Effects of High Tempetature stress on Physiologial and Gene Expression Characteristics of Grapevine(Vitis vinifera L.Hongti)during Seedling stage[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Information Engineering University, 2018. | |
[9] | 查倩, 奚晓军, 何雅妮, 等. 不同鲜食葡萄品种的高温逆境应答反应研究[J]. 上海农业学报, 2018, 34(5):77-83. |
ZHA Qian, XI Xiaojun, HE Yani, et al. Research on High Temperature Stress Response of Different Table Grape Cultivars[J]. Acta Agriculturae Shanghai, 2018, 34(5):77-83. | |
[10] | 查倩, 奚晓军, 蒋爱丽, 等. 高温胁迫对葡萄高温相关基因和蛋白表达的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(9):1694-1683. |
ZHA Qian, XI Xiaojun, JIANG Aili, et al. Influence of Heat Stress on the Expression of Related Genes and Proteins in Grapevines[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(9):1694-1683. | |
[11] | 蒋建福, 马寅峰, 樊秀彩, 等. 196份葡萄属(Vitis L.)种质资源耐热性评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2017, 18(1):70-79. |
JIANG Jianfu, MA Yinfeng, FAN Xiucai, et al. Evaluation of 196 Vitis L.Germplasm Resources to Heat Tolerance[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2017, 18(1):70-79. | |
[12] | 王涛, 田雪瑶, 谢寅峰, 等. 植物耐热性研究进展[J]. 云南农业大学学报, 2013, 28(5):719-726. |
WANG Tao, TIAN Xueyao, XIE Yinfeng, et al. Research Advance on Heat-Stress tolerance in Plant[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University, 2013, 28(5):719-726. | |
[13] |
王小波, 关攀锋, 辛明明, 等. 小麦种质资源耐热性评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(23):4191-4200.
DOI |
WANg Xiaobo, GUAN Panfeng, XIN Mingming, et al. Evaluation of Heat Tolerance in Wheat Germplasm Resources[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(23):4191-4200.
DOI |
|
[14] | 文章, 王芳, 谢刘勇, 等. 玉米自交系花期耐热能力的评价[J]. 玉米科学, 2019, 27(6):31-38. |
WEN Zhang, WANG Fang, XIE Liuyong, et al. Evaluation on the Heat Resistance of Maize Inbred Line at Flowering Stage[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2019, 27(6):31-38. | |
[15] | 王倩. 番茄种质资源苗期与花期耐热性评价与分析[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2017. |
WANg Qian. Ecaluation and Analysis of the Heat Tolerance of Tomato Germplasm Resources at Seedling and Anthesis Stage[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2017. | |
[16] | 白晨熙. 不同大白菜品种耐热性鉴定[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2019. |
BAI Chenxi. Indentifucation of Heat Tolerance of Different Chinese Cabbage Varieties[D]. Tai'an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2019. | |
[17] | 付丽军, 李聪晓, 苏胜宇, 等. 黄瓜苗期耐热种质筛选与耐热性评价体系构建[J]. 植物生理学报, 2020, 56(7):1593-1604. |
FU Lijun, LI Congxiao, SU Shengyu, et al. Screening of Cucumber Germplasms in Seedling Stage and the Construction of Evaluation System for Heat Tolerance[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2020, 56(7):1593-1604. | |
[18] | 毛静, 董艳芳, 周媛, 等. 十六个德国鸢尾品种的耐热性评价[J]. 北方园艺, 2019,(3):94-100. |
MAO Jing, DONG Yanfang, ZHOU Yuan, et al. Physiological Characteristics of Different Iris germanica Cultivars to High Temperature Stress and Evaluation of Their Heat Tolerance[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2019,(3):94-100. | |
[19] | 李婉迪, 王威, 谢倩, 等. 9个杜鹃品种的高温半致死温度与耐热性评价[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2018, 33(5):105-110. |
LI Wandi, WANG Wei, XIE Qian, et al. Heat Tolerance and High Semi-lethal Temperature of Nine Rhododendron Cultivars[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2018, 33(5):105-110. | |
[20] | 王乐宁. 月季耐热相关sHSP基因的克隆和功能初探[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2016. |
WANG Lening. Cloning and Primary Function Analysis of Thermotolerance-related sHSP Genes in Rosa Chinensis[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2016. | |
[21] | 宫本贺. 百合热击转录因子LIHSFAI及其下游热激蛋白LIHSP70响应热胁迫的机制解析[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2015. |
GONG Benhe. Mechanism Analysis of Response to Heat Stress of LIHSFAI and its Downstream LIHSP70 from lily(Lilium longiflorum)[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2015. | |
[22] | Kumar P, Rouphael Y, Cardarelli M, et al. Vegetable grafting as a tool to improve drought resistance and water use efficiency[J]. Front Plant Science, 2017,(8):8-1130. |
[23] | 马晓娣, 彭慧茹, 汪矛, 等. 作物耐热性的评价[J]. 植物学通报, 2004, 21(4):411-418. |
MA Xiaodi, PENG Huiru, WANG Mao, et al. Evaluation of Heat Tolerance in Crop[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2004, 21(4):411-418. | |
[24] | 刘克禄, 陈卫国. 植物耐热相关基因研究进展[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2015, 16(1):127-132. |
LIU Kelu, CHEN Weiguo. Recent Advance in Plant Heat-related Genes[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2015, 16(1):127-132. | |
[25] | 林俊芳, 钟凤林, 胡海非, 等. 茄子苗期耐热性的模糊综合评判[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2015, 16(2):389-394. |
LIN Junfang, ZHONG Fenglin, HU Haifei, et al. Fuzzt Comprehensive Evalution on Heat Tolerance in Eggplant Seedling Stage[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2015, 16(2):389-394. | |
[26] |
Maxwell K, Johnson G N. Chlorophy Ⅱfluorescence-A practical guide[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2000, 51(345):659-668.
DOI PMID |
[1] | 王朋, 郑凯, 赵杰银, 高文举, 龙遗磊, 陈全家, 曲延英. 陆地棉种质资源材料的耐热性评价及指标筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2081-2090. |
[2] | 马新超, 轩正英, 闵昊哲, 齐志文, 成宏宇, 谭占明, 王旭峰. 水氮耦合对沙培黄瓜光合日变化及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1966-1974. |
[3] | 丁宇, 张江辉, 白云岗, 刘洪波, 郑明, 赵经华, 肖军, 韩政宇. 双膜条件下不同干播湿出水分处理对棉花生理、生长特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 810-822. |
[4] | 吕齐, 蒋宇, 赵丰云, 雷叶, 于坤, 姚东东, 李旭娇, 沙日叶, 王芳霞. 施加生物炭对盐胁迫下无花果生物量叶绿素荧光参数及离子分配的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(3): 574-581. |
[5] | 秦国礼, 王为然, 王萌, 杨静, 黄幸磊, 刘志清, 朱家辉, 阿里甫·艾尔西, 孔杰, 陈国栋. 草甘膦对海岛棉农艺性状及光合作用的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 2861-2868. |
[6] | 由佳辉, 高林, 冯琳骄, 买迪妮阿依·买买提, 周龙, 李树德. 17个葡萄砧木品种叶片解剖结构与抗旱性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(8): 1896-1906. |
[7] | 白世践, 户金鸽, 李超, 蔡军社, 王勇, 赵荣华, 陈光. 葡萄砧木苗期对混合盐碱的生理响应及耐盐碱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(7): 1666-1679. |
[8] | 刘志刚, 任红松, 胡西旦·买买提, 王瑞华, 李海峰, 胡国智. 高温期喷施外源钙对甜瓜幼苗叶片生理特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(3): 588-596. |
[9] | 刘怡辰, 仵妮平, Токтаров Н.З., 贾姝萍, 向雪纯, 李卫华, 张东海. 不同小麦品种面粉品质性状对花期高温响应及耐热性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(3): 541-550. |
[10] | 罗文芳, 何伟, 孙晓军, 许建军. 5种植物免疫诱导剂在黄瓜上应用效果[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(1): 107-114. |
[11] | 宋羽, 曲继松, 张丽娟, 朱倩楠. 氮素用量对设施韭菜气体交换及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(5): 852-858. |
[12] | 李铭东, 梁晓玲, 阿不来提·阿布拉, 韩登旭, 杨杰, 郗浩江, 商佳鑫, 滕元旭, 杨新军, 李召锋, 王业建. 玉米自交系灌浆期耐热性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(8): 1382-1387. |
[13] | 李笑佳, 张倩, 张淑英. 外源硅对盐胁迫下棉花幼苗光合、荧光及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(5): 873-881. |
[14] | 张琦, 李鹏, 田嘉, 李疆. 转扁桃AcCBF1基因对烟草光合及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(2): 267-277. |
[15] | 钟海霞;艾尔买克·才卡斯木;张付春;潘明启;韩守安;张雯;谢辉;陈锐;伍新宇. 7个葡萄砧木根系的抗寒性研究[J]. , 2016, 53(3): 429-436. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||