多旋翼植保无人机棉花飞防作业效果

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2019.03.017

新疆农业科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (3): 537-543.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2019.03.017

• 棉花化肥农药减施研究 • 上一篇下一篇

多旋翼植保无人机棉花飞防作业效果

娄朝霞¹, 温浩军¹, 张斌¹, 辛芳², 韩小强², 付威^1,3

1.石河子大学机械电气工程学院,新疆石河子 832003;
2.石河子大学农学院,新疆石河子 832003;
3.海南大学机电工程学院,海口 570100

收稿日期:2018-12-12 出版日期:2019-03-20 发布日期:2019-06-25
通信作者: 付威(1977-),博士,教授,研究方向为精准农业航空施药技术,(E-mail)fuwei001@126.com
作者简介:娄朝霞(1994-),硕士研究生,研究方向为农业航空,(E-mail)1127677017@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2017YFD0201904);兵团国际科技合作计划(2017BC001)

Study on the Effect of Cotton Fly Prevention Operation of Multi-rotor Plant Protection UAV

Lou Zhaoxia¹, Wen Haojun¹, Zhang Bin¹, Xin Fang², Han Xiaoqiang², Fu Wei^1,3

1. College of Mechanical and Electrical engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi Xinjiang 832003,China ;
2. College of Agricultural, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003;
3.College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Hainan University, Haikou 570100,China

Received:2018-12-12 Online:2019-03-20 Published:2019-06-25
Correspondence author: Fu Wei(1977-), Ph., professor, engaged in precision agricultural aviation spraying technology. (Email)fuwei001@126.com
Supported by:
National key R & amp; d program (2017YFD0201904); International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of the Corps (2017BC001)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的研究植保无人机喷施作业雾滴的沉积分布规律和病虫害防治效果,为植保无人机田间作业提供理论依据和技术支持。方法使用无人机和喷杆喷雾机进行喷施试验,以卡罗米特纸卡和滤纸作为取样器采集雾滴,研究雾滴在棉花冠层的沉积规律,比较两种植保机械的病虫害防治效果。结果在有效喷幅范围内,无人机喷施作业雾滴主要集中在棉花冠层上部,棉花冠层中部和下部雾滴沉积量和覆盖率均较低;无人机施药雾滴在上风向和下风向的飘移量有显著差异,上风向雾滴平均飘移百分比为4.93%,下风向平均飘移百分比为14.96%,且波动较大;JT-30植保无人机和3W-1000Y悬挂式喷杆喷雾机在施药7 d后对棉蚜防治效果较好,在施药后15 d对棉叶螨防治效果较好。结论雾滴在棉花冠层的穿透性较差,下风向雾滴飘移现象较突出,对蚜虫的防治效果较好。

关键词: 棉花; 沉积量; 穿透性; 无人机; 防治效果

Abstract: Objective To study the deposition distribution law and pest control efficiency of droplet spraying operation of plant protection UAV. Method Using UAV and boom sprayer to carry out spraying test, with Kromekote card and filter paper as sampler to collect droplets, study the deposition law of droplets in cotton canopy, compare the pest control efficiency of two kinds of plant protection machinery. Results The results of test show that in the range of effective spray amplitude, the droplets of UAV spraying operation are mainly concentrated in the upper part of cotton canopy, the deposition and coverage of droplets in the middle and lower of cotton canopy are lower, The droplet drift of UAV spraying on the upper and lower wind direction is significantly different, and the average drift percentage of the upper wind direction is 4.93%, the average drift percentage of lower wind direction is 14.96%, and the fluctuation is large, JT-30 plant protection UAV and 3W-1000Y boom sprayer had better control effect on cotton aphid after 7 days of spraying, and the control effect on cotton leafhopper was better after 15 days of spraying. Conclusion From the operation effect of UAV, the penetration of droplets in cotton canopy is poor, the phenomenon of droplet drift of lower wind direction is more prominent, the control effect of aphids is good, and the research results can provide theoretical basis and technical support for the field operation of plant protection UAV.

Key words: cotton; sediment volume; penetration; control effect

中图分类号:

S562S475-9

娄朝霞, 温浩军, 张斌, 辛芳, 韩小强, 付威. 多旋翼植保无人机棉花飞防作业效果[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(3): 537-543.

Lou Zhaoxia, Wen Haojun, Zhang Bin, Xin Fang, Han Xiaoqiang, Fu Wei. Study on the Effect of Cotton Fly Prevention Operation of Multi-rotor Plant Protection UAV[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(3): 537-543.

参考文献 17

[1]	马小艳,王志国,等.无人机飞防技术现状及在我国棉田应用前景分析[J].中国棉花,2016,43(6):7-11.MA Xiao-yan, WANG Zhi-guo, et al. (2016).The present situation of UAV flight prevention technology and its application prospect analysis in cotton field in China [J]. China Cotton, 43 (6): 7-11.
[2]	Yuan Huizhu, Yang Daibin, Yan Xiaojing, et al. (2011).Pesticide efficiency and the way to optimize the spray application[J]. Plant Protection, 37(5): 14-20.
[3]	全国土壤污染状况调查公报[R].北京:中华人民共和国国土资源部和环境保护部,2014.National Soil Pollution Status Survey Bulletin [R]. Beijing: Ministry of Land and Resources of the People's Republic of China and Ministry of Environmental Protection, 2014.
[4]	Bae Y,Koo Y M.(2013).Flight attitudes and spray patterns of a roll-balanced agricultural unmanned helicopter [J] Applied Engineering in Agriculture ,29(5):675-862.
[5]	Ru Yu, Zhou Hongping, Shu Chaoran. (2014).Deposition evaluation of aerial electrostatic spraying system assembled in fixed-wing[J]. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 30(5): 751-757.
[6]	Fritz B K, Kirk I W, Hoffmann W C, et al.( 2006).Aerial application methods for increasing spray deposition on wheat heads[J]. Transactions of the ASABE, 22(3):357-364.
[7]	J. Connor Ferguson , Rodolfo G. (2016). Chechetto , Andrew J. Hewitt.Assessing the deposition and canopy penetration of nozzles with different spray qualities in an oat (Avena sativa L.) canopy.Crop Protection. 81: 14-19.
[8]	R.C.Derksen, H.Zhu, H.E.Ozkan. (2008).Determining the influence of spray quality, nozzle type, spray volume, and air-assisted application strategies on deposition of pesticides in soybean canopy. Transactions of the ASAE, 51(5): 1,529-1,537.
[9]	Wang Shilin, Song Jianli, He Xiongkui. (2017).Performances evaluation of four typical unmanned aerial vehicles used for pesticide application in China. Int J Agric & Biol Eng.10(4):22-31.
[10]	Zheng Yongjun, Yang Shenghui, Zhao Chunjiang. (2017).Modelling operation parameters of UAV on spray effects at different growth stages of corns .Int J Agric & Biol Eng.10(3):57-66.
[11]	Wei-Cai Qin, Bai-Jing Qiu, Xin-Yu Xue.(2016).Droplet deposition and control effect of insecticides sprayed with an unmanned aerial vehicle against plant hoppers.Crop Protection.85:79-88.
[12]	邱白晶,王立伟,蔡东林,等.无人直升机飞行高度与速度对喷雾沉积分布的影响[J].农业机械学报,2013,29(24):25-31.QIU Bai-jing, WANG Li-wei, CAI Dong-lin, et al. (2013).Effects of flight altitude and velocity of unmanned helicopters on spray deposition distribution [J]. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 29 (24): 25-31.
[13]	张京,何雄奎,宋坚利,等.无人驾驶直升机航空喷雾参数对雾滴沉积的影响[J].农业机械学报,2012,43(12):94 -96.ZHANG Jing, HE Xiong-kui, SONG Jian-li, et al. (2012).Effects of aerial spray parameters of unmanned helicopters on droplet deposition [J]. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 43 (12): 94-96.
[14]	许童羽,于丰华,曹英丽,等.粳稻多旋翼植保无人机雾滴沉积垂直分布研究[J].农业机械学报,2017,48(10):101-107.XU Tong-yu,YU Feng-hua, CAO Ying-li, et al. (2017).Study on vertical distribution of droplet deposition in multi-rotor plant protection UAV of Japonica Rice [J]. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 48 (10): 101-107.
[15]	王昌陵,何雄奎,王潇楠,等.无人植保机施药雾滴空间质量平衡测试方法[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(11):54-61.WANG Chang-ling, HE Xiong-kui, WANG Xiao-nan, et al. (2016).test method for spatial quality balance of application droplets of unmanned plant protection machine [J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 32 (11): 54-61.
[16]	Xue Xinyu, Tu Kang, Qin Weicai. (2014).Drift and deposition of ultra-low altitude and low volume application in paddy field. .Int J Agric & Biol Eng,7(4):23-28.
[17]	姚伟祥,兰玉彬,王娟,等.AS350B3e直升机航空喷施雾滴漂移分布特性[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(22):75-83.Yao Wei-xiang, Lan Yu-bin, Wang Juan, et. Droplet drift characteristics of aerial spraying of AS350B3e helicopter [J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 2017,33(22):75-83.

多旋翼植保无人机棉花飞防作业效果

Study on the Effect of Cotton Fly Prevention Operation of Multi-rotor Plant Protection UAV

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 17

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	陈茂光, 林涛, 张昊, 刘海军, 王一帆, 汤秋香. 地膜类型对棉花生长的影响及自身降解和回收特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108.
[2]	杨川, 张凯, 陈冰, 张慧, 柳萍, 常松, 盛建东. 棉花植株形态特征对不同水分状况的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2120-2127.
[3]	杨国江, 陈云, 林祥群, 何江勇, 刘盛林, 曲永清. 氮肥减施下有机肥替代对滴灌棉花产量、氮素吸收利用及土壤硝态氮的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145.
[4]	李雪玲, 郭俊先, 陈莉, 宋鹤岭, 张众. 不同覆膜宽度对棉花农田环境的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1840-1847.
[5]	阳妮, 玛依拉·玉素音, 杨延龙, 李春平, 张大伟, 徐海江, 赖成霞. 黄萎病枯斑型与黄化型病症棉花叶片的植物挥发物对比[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1975-1986.
[6]	米尔扎提·木塔力甫, 石秀楠, 柏军兵, 祖拜代·阿布都克日木, 吾勒加勒哈斯·阿扎提, 石书兵. 不同脱绒方式及PEG胁迫下对棉花种子活力及幼苗性状的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1561-1568.
[7]	董德誉, 程宇坤, 王睿, 雷钧杰, 王伟, 陈传信, 张永强, 耿洪伟. 基于无人机多光谱影像反演不同生育期小麦光合参数分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1308-1318.
[8]	江柱, 张江辉, 白云岗, 杨鹏年, 刘洪波, 肖军, 刘旭辉. 膜下咸水滴灌水肥盐调控对棉花生长及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1389-1397.
[9]	王文涛, 吴博, 邰红忠, 练文明, 戴翠荣, 李双江, 蒲艳梅. 新疆阿拉尔垦区不同播期对棉花生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1413-1422.
[10]	宋单波, 张国新, 王权, 刘保军, 黄涛, 韩宏伟, 白剑宇, 郭庆元. 巴旦木细菌性穿孔病菌的生物学特性及抑菌药剂筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1515-1522.
[11]	桑志伟, 梁亚军, 龚照龙, 郑巨云, 王俊铎, 李雪源, 陈全家. 不同陆地棉种质资源机采性状分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1088-1098.
[12]	逯涛, 曾庆涛, 张文, 王文博, 王政洋, 杨芮, 孙玉岩. 主成分分析及灰色关联度分析综合评价棉花产量与品质[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1099-1109.
[13]	王宁, 史应武, 牛新湘, 杨红梅, 楚敏, 詹发强, 包慧芳, 杨蓉, 龙宣杞, 丁荣荣. 棉花根际溶磷菌WJP-7发酵培养基优化及防病增产效果[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1263-1270.
[14]	张泓, 吐尔逊江·买买提, 张少民, 张军高, 周小云. 近30 a全国棉花生产区域时空变化及区域优势分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 1028-1040.
[15]	代健敏, 张巨松, 徐新龙, 李始鑫, 翟梦华, 孙明辉. 氮肥运筹对雹后重播受旱棉花生长特性及产量影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 798-809.