Effect of reducing chemical fertilizer and applying microbial one on the growth and yield of Carthamus tinctorius L. under mulch drip irrigation

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.04.001

Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (4): 781-790.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.04.001

• Standard Production Technology Research Column of Safflower • Previous Articles Next Articles

Effect of reducing chemical fertilizer and applying microbial one on the growth and yield of Carthamus tinctorius L. under mulch drip irrigation

JIA Donghia¹, SONG Xianming¹^,², GU Yuanguo¹, LI Qiang¹(), ZENG Youling², MIAO Haocui¹, GUO Meili³, HOU Xianfei¹()

1. Institute of Economic Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China
2. College of Life Science and Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China
3. Department of Pharmacy, Naval Military Medical University, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200433, China

Received:2023-09-03 Online:2024-04-20 Published:2024-05-31
Correspondence author: LI Qiang, HOU Xianfei
Supported by:
Key research and development Projects of Xinjing Uygur Autonomous Region“Xinjiang safflower high yield, high quality variety screening and high yield and efficiency technology research”(2023B02005-1);Creation of germplasm resources and selection of new varieties of economic crops with special characteristics in Xinjiang(ZYYD2022C04)

化肥减量配施微生物菌肥对膜下滴灌红花生长发育及产量的影响

贾东海¹, 宋贤明¹^,², 顾元国¹, 李强¹(), 曾幼玲², 苗昊翠¹, 郭美丽³, 侯献飞¹()

1.新疆农业科学院经济作物研究所,乌鲁木齐 830091
2.新疆大学生命科学与技术学院,乌鲁木齐 830017
3.海军军医大学药学系,上海 200433

通讯作者: 李强,侯献飞
作者简介:贾东海(1980- ),男,新疆人,研究员,研究方向为油料作物育种与栽培,(E-mail)545507831@qq.com
基金资助:
新疆维吾尔自治区重点研发项目“新疆红花高产、优质品种筛选及丰产增效技术研究”(2023B02005-1);中央引导地方科技发展专项资金项目“新疆特色经济作物种质资源创制与新品种选育”(ZYYD2022C04)

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 To study the effect of chemical fertilizer reduction combined with microbial fertilizer on the growth and development of Carthamus tinctorius L.. 【Methods】 From 2020 to 2021, a two-year located fertilization experiment was arranged in Yumin County, Tacheng Prefecture, Xinjiang. The split plot experiment design was adopted, and six treatments were set up: (1)CK:no fertilization;(2) CF:compound fertilizer of 20 kg/667m²;(3)OF:microbial bacterial fertilizer of 20 kg/667m²;(4) CF+25M:chemical fertilizer of 15 kg/667m²(chemical fertilizer reduction of 25%)+microbial bacterial fertilizer of 5 kg/667m²;(5) CF+37.5M:chemical fertilizer of 12.5 kg/667m²(chemical fertilizer decreased by 37.5%)+microbial bacterial fertilizer of 7.5 kg/667m²;(6) CF+50M:chemical fertilizer of 10 kg/667m²(chemical fertilizer decreased by 50%)+microbial bacterial fertilizer of 10 kg/667m². During the experiment, the effects of different fertilization treatments on the agronomic characters, dry matter accumulation and distribution, and yield formation of Carthamus tinctorius L. were studied. 【Results】 The results showed that CF+25M and CF+37.5M treatments were more conducive to the growth and development of Carthamus tinctorius L. than CF treatment, which could significantly increase the plant height, number of branches, number of leaves and chlorophyll content of Carthamus tinctorius L., promote the accumulation of dry matter of Carthamus tinctorius L., regulate the distribution of dry matter, coordinate and improve the yield components of Carthamus tinctorius L., thereby increasing the yield of Carthamus tinctorius L. filament and seed. Among them, the comprehensive performance of Carthamus tinctorius L. under CF+37.5M treatment was the best. The number of fruit balls per plant, 1,000 grain weight, filament yield and grain yield of Carthamus tinctorius L. under CF+37.5M treatment were significantly increased by 87.85%, 12.29%, 11.42% and 15.78%, respectively, compared with CF treatment. In addition, the plant height, root length and chlorophyll content of Carthamus tinctorius L. reached the highest level under CF+37.5M treatment. 【Conclusion】 Proper reduction of chemical fertilizer and application of microbial fertilizer (37.5% reduction of chemical fertilizer, 12.5 kg/667m² of chemical fertilizer+7.5 kg/667m² of microbial fertilizer) is an environmental protection fertilization scheme that can effectively reduce the application amount of chemical fertilizer. It can promote the growth and development of Carthamus tinctorius L. root system, improve the fertilizer utilization rate, so as to increase the dry matter accumulation of Carthamus tinctorius L., coordinate the yield composition of Carthamus tinctorius L..

Key words: Carthamus tinctorius L.; fertilizer reduction; microbial bacterial fertilizer; dry matter accumulation; growth; yield

摘要：

【目的】研究化肥减量配施微生物菌肥对膜下滴灌红花生长发育及产量的影响。【方法】2020~2021年在新疆塔城地区裕民县设置2年定位施肥试验,采用裂区试验设计,设6个处理:(1)对照CK:不施肥;(2)CF:复合肥20 kg/667m²;(3)OF:微生物菌肥20 kg/667m²;(4)CF+25M:化肥15 kg/667m²(化肥减量25%)+微生物菌肥5 kg/667m²;(5)CF+37.5M:化肥12.5 kg/667m²(化肥减量37.5%)+微生物菌肥7.5 kg/667m²;(6)CF+50M:化肥10 kg/667m²(化肥减量50%)+微生物菌肥10 kg/667m²。研究不同施肥处理对红花农艺性状、干物质积累与分配和产量形成的影响。【结果】处理CF+25M和CF+37.5M有利于红花的生长发育,可以显著增加红花株高、分枝数、叶片数和叶绿素含量等,并能促进红花干物质积累,调节干物质分配,协调改善红花产量构成因素,从而增加红花花丝和籽粒产量。其中以CF+37.5M处理下红花综合性状表现最优,其单株果球数、千粒重、花丝产量和籽粒产量分别比CF处理显著提高了87.85%、12.29%、11.42%和15.78%,同时株高、根长和叶绿素含量亦均达到最高水平。【结论】化肥减量配施微生物菌肥CF+37.5M:化肥12.5 kg/667m²(化肥减量37.5%)+微生物菌肥7.5 kg/667m²最优,能有效降低化肥施用量,促进红花生长发育,从而提高肥料利用率。

关键词: 红花, 化肥减量, 微生物菌肥, 干物质积累, 生长, 产量

CLC Number:

S567

JIA Donghia, SONG Xianming, GU Yuanguo, LI Qiang, ZENG Youling, MIAO Haocui, GUO Meili, HOU Xianfei. Effect of reducing chemical fertilizer and applying microbial one on the growth and yield of Carthamus tinctorius L. under mulch drip irrigation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 781-790.

贾东海, 宋贤明, 顾元国, 李强, 曾幼玲, 苗昊翠, 郭美丽, 侯献飞. 化肥减量配施微生物菌肥对膜下滴灌红花生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(4): 781-790.

Figures/Tables 6

References 26

[1]	杨滨键, 尚杰, 于法稳. 农业面源污染防治的难点、问题及对策[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(2): 236-245.
	YANG Binjian, SHANG Jie, YU Fawen. Difficulty, problems and countermeasures of agricultural non-point sources pollution control in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2019, 27(2): 236-245.
[2]	刘钦普. 中国化肥施用强度及环境安全阈值时空变化[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(6): 214-221.
	LIU Qinpu. Spatio-temporal changes of fertilization intensity and environmental safety threshold in China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(6): 214-221.
[3]	汪粮荐. 中国化学肥料的发展与其农业应用分析[J]. 山西农经, 2018,(10): 103, 108.
	WANG Liangjian. Development of chemical fertilizer and its agricultural application in China[J]. Shanxi Agricultural Economy, 2018,(10): 103, 108.
[4]	汤明尧, 沈重阳, 傅国海, 等. 新疆种植业化肥施用情况调查与分析[J]. 农业工程, 2021, 11(5): 132-136.
	TANG Mingyao, SHEN Chongyang, FU Guohai, et al. Investigation and analysis of fertilizer application of planting industry in Xinjiang[J]. Agricultural Engineering, 2021, 11(5): 132-136.
[5]	刘钦普, 濮励杰. 中国与主要发达国家化肥施用配置及效率对比分析[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021,(6): 328-335.
	LIU Qinpu, PU Lijie. Comparation of fertilizer allocation and integrated efficiency between China and major developed countries[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2021,(6): 328-335.
[6]	贺怀杰, 王振华, 郑旭荣, 等. 水氮耦合对膜下滴灌棉花生长及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2017, 54(11): 1983-1989. DOI
	HE Huaijie, WANG Zhenhua, ZHENG Xurong, et al. Effects of water-nitrogen coupling on growth and yield of cotton under mulch drip irrigation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 54(11): 1983-1989. DOI
[7]	马征, 崔荣宗, 贾德, 等. 氮磷钾平衡施用对大葱产量、养分吸收及利用的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019,(3): 109-114.
	MA Zheng, CUI Rongzong, JIA De, et al. Effects of N, P and K balanced fertilization on Welsh onion yield, nutrient uptake and utilization[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2019,(3): 109-114.
[8]	马静. 生物有机肥对不同土壤生物活性和油菜产量品质的影响[D]. 太古: 山西农业大学, 2017.
	MA Jing. Effect of bioorganic fertilizer application on biological activity and yield and quality of rape in different soils[D]. Taigu: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2017.
[9]	聂文翰. 基于秸秆堆肥和水肥一体化的化肥减量技术研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2017.
	NIE Wenhan. Study on Fertilizer Reduction Technique Based on Straw Composts and Fertigation System[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2017.
[10]	吕凤莲, 侯苗苗, 张弘弢, 等. 塿土冬小麦-夏玉米轮作体系有机肥替代化肥比例研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(1): 22-32.
	LYU Fenglian, HOU Miaomiao, ZHANG Hongtao, et al. Replacement ratio of chemical fertilizer nitrogen with manure under the winter wheat-summer maize rotation system in Lou soil[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018, 24(1): 22-32.
[11]	赵婧文, 张庆伟, 李政, 等. 膜下滴灌施用生物有机肥对土壤盐分及棉花产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(3): 102-108. DOI
	ZHAO Jingwen, ZHANG Qingwei, LI Zheng, et al. Effects of drip irrigation under plastic film and bio-organic fertilizer on soil salinity and cotton yield[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(3): 102-108. DOI
[12]	候丽丽, 王伟, 崔新菊, 等. 化肥减量配施有机肥对小麦生长、光合和产量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2021, 41(4): 475-482.
	HOU Lili, WANG Wei, CUI Xinju, et al. Effect of chemical fertilizer reduction combined with organic fertilizer application on growth, photosynthesis and yield of wheat[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2021, 41(4): 475-482.
[13]	Ibukunoluwa Moyin-Jesu E. Use of different organic fertilizers on soil fertility improvement, growth and head yield parameters of cabbage (Brassica Oleraceae L)[J]. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 2015, 4(4): 291-298.
[14]	李菊, 高程斐, 马宁, 等. 化肥减量配施生物有机肥对松花菜养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2021, 36(6): 153-162. DOI
	LI Ju, GAO Chengfei, MA Ning, et al. Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction combined with biological organic fertilizer on nutrient absorption and yield of cauliflower[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2021, 36(6): 153-162.
[15]	熊廷浩, 资涛, 张嫒, 等. 化肥减量条件下不同有机肥用量对油菜养分利用和产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2021,(3): 133-139.
	XIONG Tinghao, ZI Tao, ZHANG Ai, et al. Effects of different organic fertilizer dosages on nutrient utilization and yield of rapeseed under chemical fertilizer reduction[J]. Crops, 2021,(3): 133-139.
[16]	田满栀. 有机肥替代化肥对棉花生长及产量的影响[J]. 中国农技推广, 2022, 38(1): 63-65.
	TIAN Manzhi. Effect of replacing chemical fertilizer with organic fertilizer on cotton growth and yield[J]. China Agricultural Technology Extension, 2022, 38(1): 63-65.
[17]	蒋静, 张霞, 马晓丽, 等. 施肥对新疆红花莲座期生长及N、P化学计量的影响[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 32(3): 272-278.
	JIANG Jing, ZHANG Xia, MA Xiaoli, et al. Effects of fertilization on rosette stage growth and N, P ecological stoichiometry of Carthamus tinctorius L[J]. Journal of Shihezi University (Natural Science), 2014, 32(3): 272-278.
[18]	叶祝弘. 化肥减量配施有机肥对水稻生长及稻田气体调节功能的影响[D]. 沈阳农业大学, 2018.
	YE Zhuhong. Effect of chemical fertilizer reduction combined organic fertilizer on rice growth and gas regulation value in paddy field[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2018.
[19]	陈云梅, 肖厚军, 赵欢, 等. 商品有机肥替代化肥对春玉米生长、产量及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2022, 35(1): 148-152.
	CHEN Yunmei, XIAO Houjun, ZHAO Huan, et al. Effects of commercial organic fertilizer as substitution of chemical fertilizer on growth, yield of spring maize and soil fertility[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 35(1): 148-152.
[20]	卢合全, 唐薇, 罗振, 等. 商品有机肥替代部分化肥对连作棉田土壤养分、棉花生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2511-2521. DOI
	LU Hequan, TANG Wei, LUO Zhen, et al. Effects of commercial organic fertilizer substituting chemical fertilizer partially on soil nutrients, plant development, and yield in cotton[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(12): 2511-2521. DOI
[21]	吕巨智, 范继征, 谢小东, 等. 不同耕作方式对玉米生长发育、产量及品质的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2021, 53(7): 34-38.
	LYU Juzhi, FAN Jizheng, XIE Xiaodong, et al. Effects of different tillage managements on growth, yield and quality of maize[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 53(7): 34-38.
[22]	Geng Y H, Cao G J, Wang L C, et al. Effects of equal chemical fertilizer substitutions with organic manure on yield, dry matter, and nitrogen uptake of spring maize and soil nitrogen distribution[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(7): e0219512.
[23]	冯克云, 王宁, 南宏宇, 等. 水分亏缺下化肥减量配施有机肥对棉花光合特性与产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(1): 125-137. DOI
	FENG Keyun, WANG Ning, NAN Hongyu, et al. Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction with organic fertilizer application under water deficit on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of cotton[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(1): 125-137. DOI
[24]	徐令旗, 郭晓红, 兰宇辰, 等. 不同有机肥对旱直播水稻干物质积累和产量的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2021, 36(2): 188-195. DOI
	XU Lingqi, GUO Xiaohong, LAN Yuchen, et al. Effects of different organic fertilizers on dry matter accumulation and yield of dry direct-seeding rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2021, 36(2): 188-195.
[25]	何浩, 张宇彤, 危常州, 等. 不同有机替代减肥方式对玉米生长及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(5): 281-287.
	HE Hao, ZHANG Yutong, WEI Changzhou, et al. Effects of different organic substitution reducing fertilizer patterns on maize growth and soil fertility[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 33(5): 281-287.
[26]	王宁, 南宏宇, 冯克云. 化肥减量配施有机肥对棉田土壤微生物生物量、酶活性和棉花产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(1): 173-181. DOI
	WANG Ning, NAN Hongyu, FENG Keyun. Effects of reduced chemical fertilizer with organic fertilizer application on soil microbial biomass, enzyme activity and cotton yield[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(1): 173-181. DOI

生育时期 Growth period	处理 Treatments	株高Plant height(cm)		茎粗Stem thick(cm)		根长Root length(cm)		叶片数Leaves number(个)		分枝数Branchs number(个)
生育时期 Growth period	处理 Treatments	2020年	2021年	2020年	2021年	2020年	2021年	2020年	2021年	2020年	2021年
伸长期 Elongation stage	CK	3.2±1.27^ab	12.8±1.51^c	4.4±0.77^b	5.6±0.89^a	7.9±2.75^a	12.3±3.11^a	9.3±1.52^a	8.3±0.58^a	/	/
	CF	2.2±1.39^b	13.4±1.01^bc	5.6±0.4^a	6.3±0.3^a	8.3±1.24^a	9.8±2.33^a	10.7±1.53^a	8±1^a	/	/
	OF	6.1±1.54^a	13.3±0.65^c	4.9±0.69^ab	6±0.71^a	8.6±1.43^a	11.5±2.35^a	9.7±1.15^a	8±1^a	/	/
	CF+25M	3.1±0.65^ab	15.7±0.87^a	5.3±0.99^ab	6.4±0.27^a	9.9±1.06^a	12.5±1.73^a	9.7±1.53^a	8.7±1.15^a	/	/
	CF+37.5M	3.7±0.91^ab	15.1±0.42^ab	5.6±0.3^a	5.9±0.37^a	7.6±1.63^a	11.1±0.75^a	11±1^a	8.3±2.08^a	/	/
	CF+50M	4.6±0.68^ab	15.7±1.17^a	6±0.73^a	6.5±0.4^a	9.4±1.68^a	12±1.76^a	10.7±1.53^a	8±1^a	/	/
分枝期 Branching stage	CK	19.1±0.83^b	35.6±1.4^c	6.7±1.3^b	7.3±0.66^b	10.1±0.96^a	14.9±1.71^b	18.3±1.31^a	19.3±1.15^c	/	/
	CF	21.4±0.91^ab	42.8±1.93^ab	8.1±0.33^a	8.1±0.81^ab	12.5±1.67^a	16.6±0.9^a	19.7±1.52^a	22.7±0.58^ab	/	/
	OF	20.3±0.98^ab	40.4±2.48^b	8.2±1.3^a	7.5±1.55^b	12.3±0.76^a	16.2±0.12^a	16±1^b	20.7±1.15c	/	/
	CF+25M	21.1±0.95^ab	44±1.9^a	7.5±0.62^a	8.4±0.43^ab	11.8±1.66^a	15.9±1.65^a	18±1.36^a	24.3±0.58a	/	/
	CF+37.5M	25.7±1.69^a	48.5±1.49^a	8.9±0.71^a	9.1±0.54^a	9.4±1.65^b	17.3±2.57^a	19±1^a	24.7±0.58a	/	/
	CF+50M	23.1±1.17^a	42.9±1.82^ab	7.4±0.76^a	7.6±0.44^b	10.5±1.44^a	17.4±1.05^a	19.3±1.53^a	24.7±1.15a	/	/
现蕾期 Budding stage	CK	55.6±3.84^b	70.8±2.2^c	7.8±0.2^c	8.5±0.32^b	15.2±1.2^b	17.5±1^bc	67.7±2.15^c	101±11.2^c	6.5±1^c	10.3±1.1^b
	CF	65.9±3.09^ab	74.6±1.08^ab	8.9±0.62^b	9.9±0.35^a	18.9±1.17^ab	18.6±1.96^abc	90.3±3.65^ab	112.7±6.56^bc	7±2.65^bc	10±2.06^b
	OF	63.6±2.75^ab	78.8±1.5^a	11.4±1.32^a	9.6±0.52^a	18.5±1.1^ab	20.5±1.1^ab	91±3.38^ab	152±11.35^ab	8±2^abc	11.7±1.53^a
	CF+25M	65.9±3.95^ab	74.4±1.97^bc	9.2±0.2^b	9.5±1.12^a	18.7±1.97^ab	19.5±1.7^ab	89±3.05^ab	149±7.17^ab	9.7±1.53^ab	13.3±1^a
	CF+37.5M	70±2.36^a	77.7±2.8^a	11.6±1.15^a	10.2±0.53^a	20.1±2.35^a	21.7±2.08^a	109.7±3.76^a	183±10.24^a	11±2.65^a	12.7±1.06^a
	CF+50M	57.1±3.03^b	72.3±2^c	9.3±0.52^b	9.3±0.91^a	15.8±1.37^b	16.8±1.63^c	98.3±3.13^ab	138±9.51^b	9.7±1.53^ab	9.7±1.08^b
开花期 Flowering stage	CK	65.1±2.4^b	71±1.05^b	9.9±0.72^b	9.1±0.43^b	17.1±2.39^a	18.2±2.96^a	100.3±9.66^c	158.3±9.68^c	10.7±0.89^b	8.3±0.58^c
	CF	70.2±3.77^a	76.3±3.62^ab	13.7±2.29^a	11.5±0.94^a	19.4±2.95^a	21.1±5.5^a	133±8.53^bc	179±10.03^b	10.7±2^b	9.3±1.15^b
	OF	73.2±3.37^a	79.9±2.72^a	12.8±2.56^a	10.5±0.68^a	18.6±2.84^a	20.4±2.36^a	170.7±5.08^b	173.3±11.65^b	12.3±1.65^ab	9.3±0.58^b
	CF+25M	71.5±2.79^a	76.7±1.55^ab	12±1.49^ab	10.2±0.63^a	18.9±1.57^a	20.7±2.61^a	195±10.59^a	257±9.58^a	15±0.58^a	13.3±1.15^a
	CF+37.5M	73.5±4.64^a	81.6±4.26^a	11.9±0.71^ab	10.8±0.99^a	20.8±3.27^a	22.5±1.69^a	226.7±8.26^a	259±12.13^a	14±1.61^a	15±2.65^a
	CF+50M	70.6±2.26^a	75.3±3.51^ab	10.9±0.96^ab	9.6±1.21^ab	18.1±1.77^a	18.9±2.6^a	175.7±8.17^ab	248±10.15^a	10.3±1.31^b	14.3±2.31^a

生育时期 Growth period	处理 Treatments	株高Plant height(cm)		茎粗Stem thick(cm)		根长Root length(cm)		叶片数Leaves number(个)		分枝数Branchs number(个)
生育时期 Growth period	处理 Treatments	2020年	2021年	2020年	2021年	2020年	2021年	2020年	2021年	2020年	2021年
伸长期 Elongation stage	CK	3.2±1.27^ab	12.8±1.51^c	4.4±0.77^b	5.6±0.89^a	7.9±2.75^a	12.3±3.11^a	9.3±1.52^a	8.3±0.58^a	/	/
	CF	2.2±1.39^b	13.4±1.01^bc	5.6±0.4^a	6.3±0.3^a	8.3±1.24^a	9.8±2.33^a	10.7±1.53^a	8±1^a	/	/
	OF	6.1±1.54^a	13.3±0.65^c	4.9±0.69^ab	6±0.71^a	8.6±1.43^a	11.5±2.35^a	9.7±1.15^a	8±1^a	/	/
	CF+25M	3.1±0.65^ab	15.7±0.87^a	5.3±0.99^ab	6.4±0.27^a	9.9±1.06^a	12.5±1.73^a	9.7±1.53^a	8.7±1.15^a	/	/
	CF+37.5M	3.7±0.91^ab	15.1±0.42^ab	5.6±0.3^a	5.9±0.37^a	7.6±1.63^a	11.1±0.75^a	11±1^a	8.3±2.08^a	/	/
	CF+50M	4.6±0.68^ab	15.7±1.17^a	6±0.73^a	6.5±0.4^a	9.4±1.68^a	12±1.76^a	10.7±1.53^a	8±1^a	/	/
分枝期 Branching stage	CK	19.1±0.83^b	35.6±1.4^c	6.7±1.3^b	7.3±0.66^b	10.1±0.96^a	14.9±1.71^b	18.3±1.31^a	19.3±1.15^c	/	/
	CF	21.4±0.91^ab	42.8±1.93^ab	8.1±0.33^a	8.1±0.81^ab	12.5±1.67^a	16.6±0.9^a	19.7±1.52^a	22.7±0.58^ab	/	/
	OF	20.3±0.98^ab	40.4±2.48^b	8.2±1.3^a	7.5±1.55^b	12.3±0.76^a	16.2±0.12^a	16±1^b	20.7±1.15c	/	/
	CF+25M	21.1±0.95^ab	44±1.9^a	7.5±0.62^a	8.4±0.43^ab	11.8±1.66^a	15.9±1.65^a	18±1.36^a	24.3±0.58a	/	/
	CF+37.5M	25.7±1.69^a	48.5±1.49^a	8.9±0.71^a	9.1±0.54^a	9.4±1.65^b	17.3±2.57^a	19±1^a	24.7±0.58a	/	/
	CF+50M	23.1±1.17^a	42.9±1.82^ab	7.4±0.76^a	7.6±0.44^b	10.5±1.44^a	17.4±1.05^a	19.3±1.53^a	24.7±1.15a	/	/
现蕾期 Budding stage	CK	55.6±3.84^b	70.8±2.2^c	7.8±0.2^c	8.5±0.32^b	15.2±1.2^b	17.5±1^bc	67.7±2.15^c	101±11.2^c	6.5±1^c	10.3±1.1^b
	CF	65.9±3.09^ab	74.6±1.08^ab	8.9±0.62^b	9.9±0.35^a	18.9±1.17^ab	18.6±1.96^abc	90.3±3.65^ab	112.7±6.56^bc	7±2.65^bc	10±2.06^b
	OF	63.6±2.75^ab	78.8±1.5^a	11.4±1.32^a	9.6±0.52^a	18.5±1.1^ab	20.5±1.1^ab	91±3.38^ab	152±11.35^ab	8±2^abc	11.7±1.53^a
	CF+25M	65.9±3.95^ab	74.4±1.97^bc	9.2±0.2^b	9.5±1.12^a	18.7±1.97^ab	19.5±1.7^ab	89±3.05^ab	149±7.17^ab	9.7±1.53^ab	13.3±1^a
	CF+37.5M	70±2.36^a	77.7±2.8^a	11.6±1.15^a	10.2±0.53^a	20.1±2.35^a	21.7±2.08^a	109.7±3.76^a	183±10.24^a	11±2.65^a	12.7±1.06^a
	CF+50M	57.1±3.03^b	72.3±2^c	9.3±0.52^b	9.3±0.91^a	15.8±1.37^b	16.8±1.63^c	98.3±3.13^ab	138±9.51^b	9.7±1.53^ab	9.7±1.08^b
开花期 Flowering stage	CK	65.1±2.4^b	71±1.05^b	9.9±0.72^b	9.1±0.43^b	17.1±2.39^a	18.2±2.96^a	100.3±9.66^c	158.3±9.68^c	10.7±0.89^b	8.3±0.58^c
	CF	70.2±3.77^a	76.3±3.62^ab	13.7±2.29^a	11.5±0.94^a	19.4±2.95^a	21.1±5.5^a	133±8.53^bc	179±10.03^b	10.7±2^b	9.3±1.15^b
	OF	73.2±3.37^a	79.9±2.72^a	12.8±2.56^a	10.5±0.68^a	18.6±2.84^a	20.4±2.36^a	170.7±5.08^b	173.3±11.65^b	12.3±1.65^ab	9.3±0.58^b
	CF+25M	71.5±2.79^a	76.7±1.55^ab	12±1.49^ab	10.2±0.63^a	18.9±1.57^a	20.7±2.61^a	195±10.59^a	257±9.58^a	15±0.58^a	13.3±1.15^a
	CF+37.5M	73.5±4.64^a	81.6±4.26^a	11.9±0.71^ab	10.8±0.99^a	20.8±3.27^a	22.5±1.69^a	226.7±8.26^a	259±12.13^a	14±1.61^a	15±2.65^a
	CF+50M	70.6±2.26^a	75.3±3.51^ab	10.9±0.96^ab	9.6±1.21^ab	18.1±1.77^a	18.9±2.6^a	175.7±8.17^ab	248±10.15^a	10.3±1.31^b	14.3±2.31^a

Effect of reducing chemical fertilizer and applying microbial one on the growth and yield of Carthamus tinctorius L. under mulch drip irrigation

化肥减量配施微生物菌肥对膜下滴灌红花生长发育及产量的影响

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 26

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	YAN Manman, JIANG Tingting, ZHENG Feng. Practice and discussion on education and training of young managers in agricultural research institutes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 181-185.
[2]	FANG Hui, DING Yindeng, FAN Guiqiang, GAO Yonghong, HUANG Tianrong. Research report on the development status of wheat industry in southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 75-80.
[3]	ZHANG Zehua, YE Hanchun, WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao, LI Haiqiang, LIU Jian. Effects of equal nitrogen applied with urease inhibitor on cotton growth, yield, and quality under mulched drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111.
[4]	CHEN Ruijie, LUO Linyi, RUAN Xiangyang, YE Jun. Effects of humic acid on soil nutrients, cotton yield and quality in cotton fields under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121.
[5]	HUANG Boxuan, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, SHAO Jingjing, FENG Weina, PANG Chaoyou, XU Wenxiu, DONG Helin. Effects of different nitrogen inhibitors on growth, nitrogen utilization and yield of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131.
[6]	WANG Chao, XU Wenxiu, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, FENG Weina, SHAO Jingjing, DONG Helin. Response of cotton seedling growth and development to soil available potassium levels [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2132-2139.
[7]	ZHANG Niao, WANG Hui, FENG Guojun, Zaituniguli Kuerban. Study on the agronomic traits and quality differences of grain sorghum in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2160-2167.
[8]	ZHANG Fan, CHEN Xiaolu, WANG Jie, HOU Xianfei, JIA Donghai, GU Yuanguo, MIAO Haocui, LI Qiang. Effects of mixed salt stress on seed germination and seedling growth of peanut seed [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2168-2182.
[9]	CHEN Fang, LI Zihui, SUNXiaogui , ZHANG Tingjun. Different dosage of microbial agents on the yield and quality of processed tomatoes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289.
[10]	ZHANG Chengjie, HU Haoran, DUAN Songjiang, WU Yifan, ZHANG Jusong. Effects of nitrogen-dense interaction on growth, development, yield and quality of Gossypium barbadense L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830.
[11]	HOU Lili, WANG Wei, CUI Xinju, ZHOU Dawei. Effects of organic and inorganic combined application on yield, soil nutrients and enzyme activities of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1845-1852.
[12]	CHEN Fang, LI Zihui, WANG Bingyue, SUN Xiaogui, ZHANG Tingjun. Effects of microbial inoculants on growth and yield of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1853-1860.
[13]	YUAN Yingying, ZHAO Jinghua, Dilimulati Simayi, YANG Tingrui. Study on physiological indexes and yield analysis of spring wheat in pots based on apriori algorithm [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1861-1871.
[14]	NIU Tingting, MA Mingsheng, ZHANG Jungao. Effects of straw returning and plastic film mulching on soil physical and chemical properties and spring maize yield in rain-fed upland farmland [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1896-1906.
[15]	ZHAO Minhua, SONG Bingxi, ZHANG Yupeng, GAO Zhihong, ZHU Yongyong, CHEN Xiaoyuan. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction on rice yield and nitrogen partial factor productivity under dry farming conditions [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1907-1915.