Prediction model of sulfur dioxide accumulation in fresh grape stalk

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.07.022

Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (7): 1774-1783.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.07.022

• Fruits and vegetables and processing column • Previous Articles Next Articles

Prediction model of sulfur dioxide accumulation in fresh grape stalk

MA Caiyun¹^,²(), XING Shijun²^,³, YUAN Yuyao²^,³, ZHANG Zheng²^,³, WANG Man²^,³, WEI Jia²^,³(), WU Bin²^,³()

1. College of Food Sciences and Pharmacy, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
2. Institute of Agricultural Products Processing Research Institute, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China
3. Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Agricultural Products Processing and Preservation, Urumqi 830091, China

Received:2024-12-11 Online:2025-07-20 Published:2025-09-05
Correspondence author: WEI Jia, WU Bin
Supported by:
Natural Science Foundation of China(U2003213);Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(2023D01B39);Major S &T Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(2022A02006);Key R & D Program Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(2022B02026);Agricultural S & T Innovation Stability Support Special Project of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences(xjnkywdzc-2023003-2);He Second Batch of Tianchi Talent Introduction Plan of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (Young Doctoral Project)

二氧化硫在鲜食葡萄果柄中的积累预测模型

马彩云¹^,²(), 邢世均²^,³, 袁宇尧²^,³, 张政²^,³, 王曼²^,³, 魏佳²^,³(), 吴斌²^,³()

1.新疆农业大学食品科学与药学学院, 乌鲁木齐 830052
2.新疆农产品加工与保鲜重点实验室, 乌鲁木齐 830091
3.新疆维吾尔自治区农业科学院农产品加工研究所, 乌鲁木齐 830091

通讯作者: 魏佳,吴斌
作者简介:马彩云(1994-),女,甘肃人,硕士研究生,研究方向为农产品贮藏与加工,(E-mail)1169399488@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(U2003213);新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金项目(2023D01B39);新疆维吾尔自治区重大科技专项(2022A02006);新疆维吾尔自治区重点研发计划(2022B02026);新疆农业科学院农业科技创新稳定支持专项(xjnkywdzc-2023003-2);新疆维吾尔自治区第二批“天池英才”引进计划(青年博士项目)

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 Thus laying a theoretical foundation for the accumulation of SO₂ in grapes based on linear regression analysis. 【Methods】 Eleven grapes, including Flame Seedless, Summer Black, Manicure Finger, Thompson Seedless, Kyoho, Red Globe, Sweet Sapphire, Sunnny Rose, Munage, Crimson, Zizhenxiang, were studied by using correlation and multiple linear regression analysis methods to explore the relationship between stem length, width, surface area, water content, skin hole area and SO₂ accumulation in fruit stalks. 【Results】 The Pearson correlation showed that water content and skin hole area were positively correlated with SO₂ accumulation in fruit stalks. The multiple linear regression equation for predicting SO₂ accumulation in fruit stem was constructed by fumigation concentration (X₁), moisture content (X₂) and skin hole area (X₃). The cumulative prediction model Y= 0.31X₁ + 1,214.08X₂ + 1,261.34X₃-1,040.50 was obtained. The coefficient of determination (R²) of the regression equation was 0.962, The F test of significance corresponds to a P of 0, and the independent variable had a limiting influence on the dependent variable (P < 0.01). The results of regression standardized residual analysis showed that the equation conformed to normal distribution and had a high degree of fit. The average relative error between the predicted value and the actual value of the model was 0.04%, which was a low error. 【Conclusion】 The prediction structure of water content and SO₂ accumulation in fruit stem by using multiple linear regression model is more accurate, the error is lower, and it has high feasibility.

Key words: grape; linear regression; model prediction

摘要：

【目的】分析不同浓度SO₂处理、SO₂积累与果柄生理参数和结构间关系,构建SO₂积累多元线性回归模型,为SO₂在鲜食葡萄中的精准科学的使用提供理论依据。【方法】以火焰无核、夏黑、美人指、无核白、巨峰、红地球、甜蜜蓝宝石、阳光玫瑰、木纳格、克瑞森、紫珍香11种葡萄品种为研究材料,采用不同浓度SO₂处理(100、1 000、5 000和10 000 μL/L),利用相关性和多元线性回归分析方法,探究果柄长、宽、表面积、水分含量、皮孔面积与果柄中SO₂积累量间的关系。【结果】水分含量和皮孔面积与果柄中SO₂积累成正相关。用熏蒸浓度(X₁)、水分含量(X₂)、皮孔面积(X₃)构建预测果柄中SO₂积累的多元线性回归方程。得到积累预测模型Y= 0.31X₁ + 1 214.08X₂+ 1 261.34X₃- 1040.50。回归方程的决定系数(R²)为0.962,显著性F检验对应P为0,自变量对因变量有极限著影响(P<0.01)。该方程符合正态分布,且具有较高的拟合度,经验证发现,模型预测值与实际值平均相对误差为0.04%,误差较低。【结论】采用多元线性回归模型预测果柄中含水量与SO₂的积累预测结构较准确,误差较低,有较高可行性。

关键词: 葡萄, 线性回归, 模型预测

CLC Number:

S663.1

MA Caiyun, XING Shijun, YUAN Yuyao, ZHANG Zheng, WANG Man, WEI Jia, WU Bin. Prediction model of sulfur dioxide accumulation in fresh grape stalk[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(7): 1774-1783.

马彩云, 邢世均, 袁宇尧, 张政, 王曼, 魏佳, 吴斌. 二氧化硫在鲜食葡萄果柄中的积累预测模型[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(7): 1774-1783.

Figures/Tables 11

References 24

[1]	李宝庆, 梁欣, 韦婉琪, 等. 葡萄物流及贮藏保鲜包装技术研究现状与展望[J]. 包装工程, 2023, 44(23): 94-102.
	LI Baoqing, LIANG Xin, WEI Wanqi, et al. Research status and prospect of grape logistics, storage and preservation packaging technology[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2023, 44(23): 94-102.
[2]	王康飞, 王桂英, 王德铮. 不同保鲜方式对葡萄保鲜效果影响的对比研究[J]. 包装工程, 2020, 41(15): 19-24.
	WANG Kangfei, WANG Guiying, WANG Dezhi. Comparative study on the influence of different preservation methods on grape preservation effect[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2020, 41(15): 19-24.
[3]	张昭, 许耀辉, 魏佳, 等. 气调熏蒸微孔包装技术在葡萄采后贮运中的应用[J]. 现代食品科技, 2021, 37(11): 195-203.
	ZHANG Zhao, XU Yaohui, WEI Jia, et al. Application of modified atmosphere fumigation microporous packaging technology in the storage and transportation of grapes[J]. Modern Food Science and Technology, 2021, 37(11): 195-203.
[4]	佟继旭, 朱志强, 赵瑞瑞, 等. 不同SO2保鲜剂对红地球葡萄采后贮藏品质的影响[J]. 农产品质量与安全, 2019,(1): 19-23.
	TONG Jixu, ZHU Zhiqiang, ZHAO Ruirui, et al. Influence of different SO2 preservatives on post-harvest quality of red-global grapes[J]. Quality and Safety of Agro-Products, 2019,(1): 19-23.
[5]	柳素洁, 杜金华, 单玲克, 等. 香蕉中多酚氧化酶性质及褐变控制[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2012, 38(2): 126-130.
	LIU Sujie, DU Jinhua, SHAN Lingke, et al. Property of polyphenol oxidase and browning control in banana[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2012, 38(2): 126-130.
[6]	王明月, 赵亚南, 杨春亮, 等. 桂圆肉中二氧化硫残留的风险评估[J]. 热带作物学报, 2014, 35(2): 396-399.
	WANG Mingyue, ZHAO Yanan, YANG Chunliang, et al. Risk assessment of sulfur dioxide residues in Longan pulp[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2014, 35(2): 396-399.
[7]	周江, 魏佳, 张辉, 等. 二氧化硫(SO2)间歇熏蒸对红地球葡萄贮藏品质的影响[J]. 食品科技, 2015, 40(12): 295-299.
	ZHOU Jiang, WEI Jia, ZHANG Hui, et al. Effects of sulfur dioxide intermittent fumigation on postharvest quality of red globe grapes during storage[J]. Food Science and Technology, 2015, 40(12): 295-299.
[8]	周昊宇, 朱倩莹, 钟玉鸣, 等. 基于线性回归分析法预测李果实干制后果干糖酸比[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2023, 14(20): 200-208.
	ZHOU Haoyu, ZHU Qianying, ZHONG Yuming, et al. Prediction of sugar-acid ratio of Prunus salicina L. fruit after drying based on linear regression analysis method[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2023, 14(20): 200-208.
[9]	Xiao Z Y, Rogiers S Y, Sadras V O, et al. Hypoxia in grape berries: the role of seed respiration and lenticels on the berry pedicel and the possible link to cell death[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2018, 69(8): 2071-2083.
[10]	冯珊珊, 黄春晖, 唐梦云, 等. 细叶云南松针叶形态和显微性状地理变异及其环境解释[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(8): 1116-1130. DOI
	FENG Shanshan, HUANG Chunhui, TANG Mengyun, et al. Geographical variation of needles phenotypic and anatomic traits between populations of Pinus yunnanensis var. tenuifolia and its environmental interpretation[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2023, 47(8): 1116-1130. DOI
[11]	许诺, 李辉, 高寒, 等. 小麦粉吸水量预测模型的建立[J]. 食品科技, 2022, 47(6): 184-190.
	XU Nuo, LI Hui, GAO Han, et al. Establishment of predictive model for water absorption of flour[J]. Food Science and Technology, 2022, 47(6): 184-190.
[12]	Qiao X S, Han F, Zhao L, et al. Solubility of SO2 in 2-butoxy ethanol + water system and investigation on absorption mechanism[J]. Physics and Chemistry of Liquids, 2020, 58(5): 577-589.
[13]	韩洁, 陈存坤, 王文生, 等. 保鲜剂不同组合对袋内SO₂积累及葡萄保鲜质量的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2015, 36(24): 319-325.
	HAN Jie, CHEN Cunkun, WANG Wensheng, et al. Effects of different combinations of preservatives on SO₂ accumulation in packaging bags and quality preservation of grapes[J]. Food Science, 2015, 36(24): 319-325.
[14]	高海燕, 张华云, 王善广, 等. 葡萄对SO₂伤害的敏感性与吸收SO₂途径的探讨[J]. 食品工业科技, 2006, 27(6): 156-158, 161.
	GAO Haiyan, ZHANG Huayun, WANG Shanguang, et al. Study on sensitivity of grope plant to SO₂ and its absorption mechanism[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2006, 27(6): 156-158, 161.
[15]	Rodrigues W P, Silva J R, Ferreira L S, et al. Stomatal and photochemical limitations of photosynthesis in coffee (Coffea spp. ) plants subjected to elevated temperatures[J]. Crop and Pasture Science, 2018, 69(3): 317.
[16]	Huang W, Hu H, Zhang S B. Photorespiration plays an important role in the regulation of photosynthetic electron flow under fluctuating light in tobacco plants grown under full sunlight[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2015, 6: 621. DOI PMID
[17]	Schreiber L, Franke R, Hartmann K. Wax and suberin development of native and wound periderm of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) and its relation to peridermal transpiration[J]. Planta, 2005, 220(4): 520-530. DOI PMID
[18]	Bakker J, Bridle P. Strawberry juice colour: The effect of sulphur dioxide and edta on the stability of anthocyanins[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1992, 60(4): 477-481.
[19]	Song W P, Yi J W, Kurniadinata O F, et al. Linking fruit Ca uptake capacity to fruit growth and pedicel anatomy, a cross-species study[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018, 9: 575. DOI PMID
[20]	Cesarino I. Unraveling the regulatory network of bamboo lignification[J]. Plant Physiology, 2021, 187(2): 673-675. DOI PMID
[21]	张大龙, 柳玉平, 李洋, 等. 基于CO₂传输阻力解析的土壤水分调控番茄光合生理机制[J]. 农业机械学报, 2018, 49(12): 292-299.
	ZHANG Dalong, LIU Yuping, LI Yang, et al. Mechanism of soil moisture regulating photosynthesis rate of tomato based on resistance of CO₂ transport along pathway[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2018, 49(12): 292-299.
[22]	王端阳, 李炼, 李娜, 等. 一种估算CO₂和SO₂在多元胺水溶液体系中溶解度的数学模型[J]. 计算机与应用化学, 2013, 30(5): 492-496.
	WANG Duanyang, LI Lian, LI Na, et al. A simple mathematical model for estimating the solubility of CO2 and SO2 in the ploy-amines aqueous solutions[J]. Computers and Applied Chemistry, 2013, 30(5): 492-496.
[23]	彭丹, 陈名扬, 史翠熠, 等. 基于低场核磁共振弛豫特性结合多元线性回归同步评价菜籽煎炸油品质[J]. 分析化学, 2023, 51(6): 1042-1050.
	PENG Dan, CHEN Mingyang, SHI Cuiyi, et al. Synchronous evaluation of rapeseed frying oil quality indexes based on low-field nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation properties combined with multiple linear regression[J]. Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2023, 51(6): 1042-1050.
[24]	唐启义, 唐洁. 偏最小二乘回归分析在均匀设计试验建模分析中的应用[J]. 数理统计与管理, 2005, 24(5): 45-49, 67.
	TANG Qiyi, TANG Jie. Application of partial least-squares regressive on modeling analysis of uniform design experiment[J]. Application of Statistics and Management, 2005, 24(5): 45-49, 67.

品种 Varieties	树龄 Tree- age(a)	采样时间 Sample time Year/Month/Day	采样地点 Sampling location
火焰无核 Flame Seedless	7	2023/8/18	昌吉市呼图壁县
夏黑 Summer Black	7	2023/8/22	乌鲁木齐市头屯河区
美人指 Manicure Figer	7	2023/8/23	乌鲁木齐市头屯河区
无核白 Thompson seedless	7	2023/8/24	吐鲁番市高昌区
巨峰 Kyoho	7	2023/8/26	乌鲁木齐市头屯河区
红地球 Red Globe	7	2023/9/3	乌鲁木齐市头屯河区
蓝宝石 Sweet Sapphire	7	2023/9/20	博乐市八十一团
阳光玫瑰 Sunny Rose	6	2023/9/25	乌鲁木市齐头屯河区
木纳格 Munage	7	2023/9/28	喀什市阿图什县
克瑞森 Crimson Seedless	7	2023/10/1	石河子市一五二团
紫珍香 Zizhenxiang	7	2023/10/2	石河子市一五二团

品种 Varieties	树龄 Tree- age(a)	采样时间 Sample time Year/Month/Day	采样地点 Sampling location
火焰无核 Flame Seedless	7	2023/8/18	昌吉市呼图壁县
夏黑 Summer Black	7	2023/8/22	乌鲁木齐市头屯河区
美人指 Manicure Figer	7	2023/8/23	乌鲁木齐市头屯河区
无核白 Thompson seedless	7	2023/8/24	吐鲁番市高昌区
巨峰 Kyoho	7	2023/8/26	乌鲁木齐市头屯河区
红地球 Red Globe	7	2023/9/3	乌鲁木齐市头屯河区
蓝宝石 Sweet Sapphire	7	2023/9/20	博乐市八十一团
阳光玫瑰 Sunny Rose	6	2023/9/25	乌鲁木市齐头屯河区
木纳格 Munage	7	2023/9/28	喀什市阿图什县
克瑞森 Crimson Seedless	7	2023/10/1	石河子市一五二团
紫珍香 Zizhenxiang	7	2023/10/2	石河子市一五二团

品种 Varieties	长 Length (mm)	宽 Width (mm)	果柄表面积 Area (mm²)	皮孔面积 lenticel area (%)	果柄水分含量 stem moisture content(%)
火焰无核Flame Seedless	5.37±0.14^e	1.04±0.16^e	17.57±3.14^e	1.15±0.05^a	78.00±0.76^a
夏黑Summer Black	8.27±0.29^bc	2.28±0.29^bc	59.07±5.45^c	0.27±0.09^d	72.50±0.81
美人指Manicure Figer	8.44±0.46^bc	2.26±0.19^bc	59.79±3.53^b	0.41±0.05^cd	77.19±0.62^a
无核白Thompson seedless	6.40±0.24^d	3.93±0.36^a	78.91±6.97^a	0.58±0.03^bc	62.52±1.40^d
巨峰Kyoho	7.93±0.77^c	2.07±0.11^c	51.47±4.66^d	1.22±0.11^a	77.18±0.54^a
红地球Red Globe	7.71±0.27^c	2.52±0.28^b	61.11±8.l7^b	0.64±0.06^b	71.84±0.49^b
蓝宝石Sweet Sapphire	8.94±0.18^b	2.54±0.62^b	71.25±17.37^a	0.27±0.03^d	71.19±0.60^b
阳光玫瑰Shine Musca	8.53±0.27^bc	2.5±0.23^b	66.97±7.78^a	0.37±0.02^cd	67.72±0.46^c
木纳格Munage	11.54±0.53^a	1.99±0.2^bc	72.40±10.69^a	1.03±0.13^a	70.94±0.18^b
克瑞森Crimson Seedless	7.98±0.29^c	1.79±0.17^cd	44.56±2.77^d	0.36±0.05^cd	70.83±0.36^b
紫珍香Zizhenxiang	11.61±0.79^a	1.39±0.17d^e	50.81±9.41^d	0.21±0.02^d	60.31±0.11^e

品种 Varieties	长 Length (mm)	宽 Width (mm)	果柄表面积 Area (mm²)	皮孔面积 lenticel area (%)	果柄水分含量 stem moisture content(%)
火焰无核Flame Seedless	5.37±0.14^e	1.04±0.16^e	17.57±3.14^e	1.15±0.05^a	78.00±0.76^a
夏黑Summer Black	8.27±0.29^bc	2.28±0.29^bc	59.07±5.45^c	0.27±0.09^d	72.50±0.81
美人指Manicure Figer	8.44±0.46^bc	2.26±0.19^bc	59.79±3.53^b	0.41±0.05^cd	77.19±0.62^a
无核白Thompson seedless	6.40±0.24^d	3.93±0.36^a	78.91±6.97^a	0.58±0.03^bc	62.52±1.40^d
巨峰Kyoho	7.93±0.77^c	2.07±0.11^c	51.47±4.66^d	1.22±0.11^a	77.18±0.54^a
红地球Red Globe	7.71±0.27^c	2.52±0.28^b	61.11±8.l7^b	0.64±0.06^b	71.84±0.49^b
蓝宝石Sweet Sapphire	8.94±0.18^b	2.54±0.62^b	71.25±17.37^a	0.27±0.03^d	71.19±0.60^b
阳光玫瑰Shine Musca	8.53±0.27^bc	2.5±0.23^b	66.97±7.78^a	0.37±0.02^cd	67.72±0.46^c
木纳格Munage	11.54±0.53^a	1.99±0.2^bc	72.40±10.69^a	1.03±0.13^a	70.94±0.18^b
克瑞森Crimson Seedless	7.98±0.29^c	1.79±0.17^cd	44.56±2.77^d	0.36±0.05^cd	70.83±0.36^b
紫珍香Zizhenxiang	11.61±0.79^a	1.39±0.17d^e	50.81±9.41^d	0.21±0.02^d	60.31±0.11^e

品种 Varieties	熏蒸浓度(μL/L) Fumigation concentration
品种 Varieties	100	1 000	5 000	10 000
火焰无核Flame Seedless	24.00±1.73^b	225.00±8.32^a	2 320.33±54.56^a	3 360.00±10.39^b
夏黑Summer Black	16.00±1.33^e	144.33±2.02^f	1 868.33±6.64^d	2 696.00±16.16^de
美人指Manicure Figer	19.30±0.36^d	144.33±2.02^g	1 916.00±2.31^d	2 664.33±6.06^cd
无核白Thompson seedless	23.43±1.30^c	200.00±6.30^b	2 074.00±12.70^bc	3 537.00±1.73^b
巨峰Kyoho	13.80±0.23^de	131.16±3.29^d	1 855.67±17.61^d	2 832.00±15.58^e
红地球Red Globe	17.05±0.73^a	141.40±2.42^g	2 000.00±8.66^c	3 359.66±14.72^de
蓝宝石Sweet Sapphire	15.33±1.45^e	112.40±0.40^e	1 758.00±7.50^e	2 840.00±11.55^de
阳光玫瑰Sunny Rose	21.33±2.02^f	89.66±2.48^g	1 340.00±18.52^g	3 376.33±10.68^bc
木纳格Munage	46.33±1.45^d	275.33±13.64^c	2 148.33±62.20^b	3 458.33±115.18^a
克瑞森Crimson Seedless	18.33±1.45^f	78.93±2.87^g	1 458.33±2.03^f	2 880.00±13.85^cd
紫珍香Zizhenxiang	15.33±0.88^f	81.60±1.67^g	1 296.00±32.92^g	2 240.00±12.70^de

Prediction model of sulfur dioxide accumulation in fresh grape stalk

二氧化硫在鲜食葡萄果柄中的积累预测模型

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 24

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

指标 Indexes	标准错误 Standard error		标准化系数 Standardized coefficient	t	显著性 Significance	共线性检测 Collinearity dctection
指标 Indexes	B	标准错误 Standard error	β	t	显著性 Significance	容差 Tolerance	VIF
常量Constant	-1 040.504	528.191		-1.9.70	0.056
熏蒸浓度 Fumigation concentration	0.314	0.010	0.975	31.612	<0.001	1.000	1.000
水分含量 Moisture content	1 214.820	749.204	0.51	1.621	0.113	0.966	1.036
皮孔面积 Pithole area	1 261.336	494.120	0.80	2.553	0.015	0.966	1.036

来源 Source	平方和	自由度	均方 Mean square	F	P
回归Return	66 948 779.47	3	22 316 259.82	336.785	0.000^b
残差Residual	26 650 506.338	40	66 262.658
总计Total	69 599 285.80	43	**		***

指标 Index	最大值 Maximum	最小值 Minimum	平均值 Average value	变异系数 Coefficient	观测值 Observations
模型预测值 Model predicted value	3 363.93	42.54	1 637.73	0.73	35
实际预测值 Actual predicted value	3 360.00	24.00	1 602.10	0.77
模型预测值与实际预测值的绝对误差 Absdute error between model predic ted value and actual predicted value of variation	3.34	18.00	35.63
模型预测值与实际预测值的相对误差 Relative error between the model predicted value and the actual predicted	0.00	0.75	0.02

[1]	WANG Shu, LIU Baojun, ZHANG Liya, SHAN Jiaqi, LI Kemei, BAI Jianyu. Sequence analysis and detection of grapevine geminivirus A [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(4): 887-893.
[2]	LYU Qi, ZHANG Xiaohui, ZHANG Jinzhi, WANG Jingjing. Effects of increasing organicfertilizer and reducing chemical fertilizer on fruit quality of Xiahei grape in arid areas [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(4): 894-902.
[3]	ZHANG Lingjian, ZHANG Kai, ZHANG Hui, GUO Xiaomeng, CHEN Guoyue, WANG Yiding, JIA Qingyu. Study on the relationship between plant water content and morphological characteristics of top stem and leaf during the whole growth period of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(3): 531-538.
[4]	BAI Shijian, HU Jinge, CAI Junshe, WU Jiuyun, MA Xiaocai, YUAN Sen, WU Guohong. Cultivation characteristics and berry quality analysis of twelve grape cultivars in Turpan grape production area [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(3): 678-687.
[5]	WANG Min, HAN Shouan, LIU Xupeng, ZHANG Wen, ZHANG Fuchun, ZHONG Haixia, WU Xinyu, PAN Mingqi. The current development status of the grape industry in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 127-130.
[6]	SHEN Xiaohe, ZHU Zhanjiang, YANG Liling, LIU Jia, Abulizi Basiti. Current situation and development suggestions of wine grape mechanization in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 147-152.
[7]	HU Jinge, BAI Shijian, CHEN Guang, CAI Junshe. Effects of different ground mulch types on the berry quality of Marselan wine grape and comprehensive evaluation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(5): 1131-1139.
[8]	MA Yunlong, XIE Hui, ZHANG Wen, ZHU Xuehui, WANG Yanmeng, MAI Sile, ZHANG Jiaxi. Effects of temperature on color and drying characteristics of green raisins [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 345-354.
[9]	WANG Jijiao, PAN Yue, WANG Shiwei, HAN Zhengwei, MA Yong, HU Haifang, WANG Baoqing. Canonical correlation analysis of soil nutrients and the quality of Beibinghong grape juice [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 355-364.
[10]	XU Andong, ZHANG Guangjie, FU Rao, MENG Zhuo, YAN Yu, LI Baoguo, MA Deying. Optimization of high-efficiency decomposition conditions and transformation parameters of grapevine branches eaten by the Protaetia brevitarsis Lewis [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 3067-3077.
[11]	ZHANG Jinrong, LU Shiling, LUO Ruifeng, MA Xiaoning, WANG Guodong. Effect of spraying foliar selenium on selenium content and quality of three cultivars of grape fruit [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(10): 2417-2426.
[12]	DANG Xinchen, SHEN Zongyi, QU Donglin, SONG Yuyang. Effects of different agronomic measures on leaf curtain microclimate of Chardonnay grape [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(10): 2427-2433.
[13]	WANG Yong, LI Yuling, Sulaiman Aizezi, HU Jinge, SUN Feng, WU Guohong. Study on pollination and seed setting characteristics of two grape cultivars [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(1): 101-108.
[14]	YANG Bo, WANG Hao, CHEN Yongwei, HA Rong, JIN Wei, XU Can, ZHANG Min, YANG Guili, YANG Hongbo, MA Wenli. Study on establishment and optimization of rapid tissue culture propagation technology of three wine grape cultivars [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(1): 109-117.
[15]	HU Jinge, BAI Shijian, CHEN Guang, CAI Junshe. Transcriptome and metabolome integrated analysis of flavonoids in Xinyu grape peel under different ground mulch 5ypes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(1): 63-78.