Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (11): 2694-2703.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.11.012
• Crop Genetics and Breeding · Germplasm Resources·Molecular Genetics·Soil Fertilizer • Previous Articles Next Articles
Buhaliqiemu Abulizi1(), ZHANG Yanhong1, YUAN Jie1, ZHAO Zhiqiang1, WEN Xiaorong2, DU Xiaojing2, WANG Fengbin2, LYU Yuping2, Amanguli Aizizi3(
)
Received:
2023-01-13
Online:
2023-11-20
Published:
2023-12-07
Correspondence author:
Amanguli Aizizi (1974-), female, Korla, Xinjiang. senior agronomist, research direction is to improve the quality of cultivated land,saline-alkali land improvement, (E-mail)273067815@qq.com
Supported by:
布哈丽且木·阿不力孜1(), 张燕红1, 袁杰1, 赵志强1, 文孝荣2, 杜孝敬2, 王奉斌2, 吕玉平2, 阿曼古丽·艾孜子3(
)
通讯作者:
阿曼古丽·艾孜子(1974-),女,新疆库尔勒人,正高级农艺师,研究方向为耕地质量与盐碱地改良,(E-mail)273067815@qq.com
作者简介:
布哈丽且木·阿不力孜(1974-),女,新疆喀什人,研究员,研究方向为水稻育种及栽培,(E-mail)1787237708@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Buhaliqiemu Abulizi, ZHANG Yanhong, YUAN Jie, ZHAO Zhiqiang, WEN Xiaorong, DU Xiaojing, WANG Fengbin, LYU Yuping, Amanguli Aizizi. Screening and evaluation of aromatic rice varieties with high quality and high yield in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2694-2703.
布哈丽且木·阿不力孜, 张燕红, 袁杰, 赵志强, 文孝荣, 杜孝敬, 王奉斌, 吕玉平, 阿曼古丽·艾孜子. 新疆优质丰产香型水稻品种筛选与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(11): 2694-2703.
品种 Variety | 有效穗数 (104穗/667m2) Effective panicles (104 panicle/667m2) | 穗粒数(粒) Kernels per panicle (kernel) | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight (g) | 产量 Yield (kg/667m2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
新粳香53号Xinjingxiang 53 | 21.81h | 178.37a | 17.40k | 607.22f |
新粳香83号Xinjingxiang 83 | 30.65b | 83.26k | 23.42f | 580.52g |
新粳香2号Xinjingxiang 2 | 26.27d | 87.77j | 29.28a | 623.27de |
新粳香6号Xinjing xiang 6 | 33.33a | 89.24i | 21.40i | 620.39e |
新粳香8号Xinjingxiang 8 | 25.69e | 105.13g | 24.89c | 635.85c |
新粳香5号Xinjingxiang 5 | 21.73h | 114.79e | 24.34d | 556.94h |
新粳香1号Xinjingxiang 1 | 24.93g | 90.68f | 23.26g | 507.27i |
新稻50号Xindao 50 | 29.19c | 102.24h | 22.84h | 628.96d |
新粳8号Xinjing 8 | 26.23d | 116.50d | 23.51e | 671.16b |
新粳伊20号Xinjingyi 20 | 25.90e | 127.70b | 25.48b | 763.01a |
新粳伊3号Xinjingyi 3 | 25.26f | 122.70c | 21.08j | 627.86d |
Tab.1 Yield and component factors of different aromatic rice varieties
品种 Variety | 有效穗数 (104穗/667m2) Effective panicles (104 panicle/667m2) | 穗粒数(粒) Kernels per panicle (kernel) | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight (g) | 产量 Yield (kg/667m2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
新粳香53号Xinjingxiang 53 | 21.81h | 178.37a | 17.40k | 607.22f |
新粳香83号Xinjingxiang 83 | 30.65b | 83.26k | 23.42f | 580.52g |
新粳香2号Xinjingxiang 2 | 26.27d | 87.77j | 29.28a | 623.27de |
新粳香6号Xinjing xiang 6 | 33.33a | 89.24i | 21.40i | 620.39e |
新粳香8号Xinjingxiang 8 | 25.69e | 105.13g | 24.89c | 635.85c |
新粳香5号Xinjingxiang 5 | 21.73h | 114.79e | 24.34d | 556.94h |
新粳香1号Xinjingxiang 1 | 24.93g | 90.68f | 23.26g | 507.27i |
新稻50号Xindao 50 | 29.19c | 102.24h | 22.84h | 628.96d |
新粳8号Xinjing 8 | 26.23d | 116.50d | 23.51e | 671.16b |
新粳伊20号Xinjingyi 20 | 25.90e | 127.70b | 25.48b | 763.01a |
新粳伊3号Xinjingyi 3 | 25.26f | 122.70c | 21.08j | 627.86d |
品种 Variety | 糙米率 Brown rice rate (%) | 精米率 Milled rice rate (%) | 整精米率 Head rice rate (%) | 垩白度 Chalky degree (%) | 垩白率 Chalky rate (%) | 蛋白质 含量 Protein content (%) | 直链淀 粉含量 Amylose content (%) | 胶稠度 Gel consis tency (mm) | 粒长 Grain length (mm) | 长宽比 Aspect ratio | 透明度 Transpa rency |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新粳香53号 Xinjingxiang 53 | 77.30g | 62.43h | 59.83e | 0.10d | 1.00d | 7.76g | 14.87f | 75.67d | 4.57g | 1.87d | 1.00b |
新粳香83号 Xinjingxiang 83 | 81.10e | 70.43e | 67.70c | 0.10d | 1.00d | 11.59a | 16.67d | 73.67d | 6.47c | 2.70b | 1.00b |
新粳香2号 Xinjingxiang 2 | 82.60d | 71.67c | 62.73d | 0.10d | 1.00d | 8.67d | 18.13c | 74.33d | 7.70a | 3.20a | 1.00b |
新粳香6号 Xinjingxiang 6 | 83.33c | 73.47b | 68.70b | 0.33b | 3.33b | 7.44h | 18.53b | 82.67b | 5.17f | 1.80de | 1.00b |
新粳香8号 Xinjingxiang 8 | 85.40a | 75.67a | 68.87b | 0.33b | 2.00c | 7.97e | 15.47e | 81.33b | 4.57g | 1.60e | 1.67a |
新粳香5号 Xinjingxiang 5 | 79.90f | 65.73g | 54.80g | 0.20c | 1.00d | 9.35b | 18.63b | 75.67d | 6.77b | 3.10a | 1.00b |
新粳香1号 Xinjingxiang 1 | 81.17e | 67.23f | 53.30h | 0.20c | 2.00c | 8.83c | 19.30a | 66.33f | 6.30c | 2.57b | 1.67a |
新稻50号 Xindao 50 | 83.30c | 73.17b | 69.23a | 0.20c | 1.00d | 7.25i | 15.40e | 78.00c | 5.47e | 2.13c | 1.00b |
新粳8号 Xinjing 8 | 81.23e | 70.83d | 57.57f | 0.10d | 2.00c | 8.69d | 19.17a | 71.00e | 5.60e | 2.27c | 1.00b |
新粳伊20号 Xinjingyi 20 | 84.70b | 75.80a | 69.40a | 0.53a | 5.00a | 7.82fg | 19.40a | 87.00a | 5.57e | 2.20c | 1.00b |
新粳伊3号 Xinjingyi 3 | 81.23e | 75.63a | 69.33a | 0.10d | 1.00d | 7.89ef | 16.37d | 75.33d | 5.83d | 2.30c | 1.00b |
Tab.2 Rice quality traits of different aromatic rice varieties
品种 Variety | 糙米率 Brown rice rate (%) | 精米率 Milled rice rate (%) | 整精米率 Head rice rate (%) | 垩白度 Chalky degree (%) | 垩白率 Chalky rate (%) | 蛋白质 含量 Protein content (%) | 直链淀 粉含量 Amylose content (%) | 胶稠度 Gel consis tency (mm) | 粒长 Grain length (mm) | 长宽比 Aspect ratio | 透明度 Transpa rency |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新粳香53号 Xinjingxiang 53 | 77.30g | 62.43h | 59.83e | 0.10d | 1.00d | 7.76g | 14.87f | 75.67d | 4.57g | 1.87d | 1.00b |
新粳香83号 Xinjingxiang 83 | 81.10e | 70.43e | 67.70c | 0.10d | 1.00d | 11.59a | 16.67d | 73.67d | 6.47c | 2.70b | 1.00b |
新粳香2号 Xinjingxiang 2 | 82.60d | 71.67c | 62.73d | 0.10d | 1.00d | 8.67d | 18.13c | 74.33d | 7.70a | 3.20a | 1.00b |
新粳香6号 Xinjingxiang 6 | 83.33c | 73.47b | 68.70b | 0.33b | 3.33b | 7.44h | 18.53b | 82.67b | 5.17f | 1.80de | 1.00b |
新粳香8号 Xinjingxiang 8 | 85.40a | 75.67a | 68.87b | 0.33b | 2.00c | 7.97e | 15.47e | 81.33b | 4.57g | 1.60e | 1.67a |
新粳香5号 Xinjingxiang 5 | 79.90f | 65.73g | 54.80g | 0.20c | 1.00d | 9.35b | 18.63b | 75.67d | 6.77b | 3.10a | 1.00b |
新粳香1号 Xinjingxiang 1 | 81.17e | 67.23f | 53.30h | 0.20c | 2.00c | 8.83c | 19.30a | 66.33f | 6.30c | 2.57b | 1.67a |
新稻50号 Xindao 50 | 83.30c | 73.17b | 69.23a | 0.20c | 1.00d | 7.25i | 15.40e | 78.00c | 5.47e | 2.13c | 1.00b |
新粳8号 Xinjing 8 | 81.23e | 70.83d | 57.57f | 0.10d | 2.00c | 8.69d | 19.17a | 71.00e | 5.60e | 2.27c | 1.00b |
新粳伊20号 Xinjingyi 20 | 84.70b | 75.80a | 69.40a | 0.53a | 5.00a | 7.82fg | 19.40a | 87.00a | 5.57e | 2.20c | 1.00b |
新粳伊3号 Xinjingyi 3 | 81.23e | 75.63a | 69.33a | 0.10d | 1.00d | 7.89ef | 16.37d | 75.33d | 5.83d | 2.30c | 1.00b |
性状指标 Trait Index | 最小值 Min | 最大值 Max | 平均值 Average | 标准差 SD | 变异系数 CV(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
有效穗数(104穗/667m2) Effective panicles(104 panicle/667m2) | 21.57 | 33.41 | 26.45 | 3.37 | 12.74 |
穗粒数(粒)Kernels per panicle(kernel) | 83.25 | 178.50 | 110.76 | 26.17 | 23.63 |
千粒重1000-grain weight(g) | 17.30 | 29.36 | 23.36 | 2.87 | 12.29 |
产量Yield( kg/667m2) | 502.84 | 769.40 | 620.22 | 62.73 | 10.11 |
糙米率Brown rice rate(%) | 77.10 | 85.70 | 81.93 | 2.21 | 2.70 |
精米率Milled rice rate(%) | 62.10 | 76.10 | 71.10 | 4.26 | 6.00 |
整精米率Head rice rate(%) | 53.10 | 69.70 | 63.77 | 6.15 | 9.64 |
垩白度Chalky degree(%) | 0.10 | 0.60 | 0.21 | 0.14 | 66.67 |
垩白率Chalky rate(%) | 1.00 | 6.00 | 1.85 | 1.28 | 69.19 |
蛋白质含量Protein content(%) | 7.22 | 11.71 | 8.48 | 1.18 | 13.92 |
直链淀粉含量Amylose content(%) | 14.70 | 19.40 | 17.45 | 1.68 | 9.63 |
胶稠度Gel consistency(mm) | 65.00 | 88.10 | 76.45 | 5.61 | 7.34 |
粒长Grain length(mm) | 4.40 | 7.80 | 5.82 | 0.92 | 15.81 |
长宽比Aspect ratio | 1.60 | 3.30 | 2.34 | 0.51 | 21.79 |
透明度Transparency | 1.00 | 2.00 | 1.12 | 0.33 | 29.46 |
Tab.3 Statistics on variation of yield and quality of different aromatic rice varieties
性状指标 Trait Index | 最小值 Min | 最大值 Max | 平均值 Average | 标准差 SD | 变异系数 CV(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
有效穗数(104穗/667m2) Effective panicles(104 panicle/667m2) | 21.57 | 33.41 | 26.45 | 3.37 | 12.74 |
穗粒数(粒)Kernels per panicle(kernel) | 83.25 | 178.50 | 110.76 | 26.17 | 23.63 |
千粒重1000-grain weight(g) | 17.30 | 29.36 | 23.36 | 2.87 | 12.29 |
产量Yield( kg/667m2) | 502.84 | 769.40 | 620.22 | 62.73 | 10.11 |
糙米率Brown rice rate(%) | 77.10 | 85.70 | 81.93 | 2.21 | 2.70 |
精米率Milled rice rate(%) | 62.10 | 76.10 | 71.10 | 4.26 | 6.00 |
整精米率Head rice rate(%) | 53.10 | 69.70 | 63.77 | 6.15 | 9.64 |
垩白度Chalky degree(%) | 0.10 | 0.60 | 0.21 | 0.14 | 66.67 |
垩白率Chalky rate(%) | 1.00 | 6.00 | 1.85 | 1.28 | 69.19 |
蛋白质含量Protein content(%) | 7.22 | 11.71 | 8.48 | 1.18 | 13.92 |
直链淀粉含量Amylose content(%) | 14.70 | 19.40 | 17.45 | 1.68 | 9.63 |
胶稠度Gel consistency(mm) | 65.00 | 88.10 | 76.45 | 5.61 | 7.34 |
粒长Grain length(mm) | 4.40 | 7.80 | 5.82 | 0.92 | 15.81 |
长宽比Aspect ratio | 1.60 | 3.30 | 2.34 | 0.51 | 21.79 |
透明度Transparency | 1.00 | 2.00 | 1.12 | 0.33 | 29.46 |
相关性 Correlation | 有效穗数 Effective panicles | 穗粒数 Kernels per panicle | 千粒重 1000- grain weight | 产量 Yield | 糙米率 Brown rice rate | 精米率 Milled rice rate | 整精米率 Head rice rate | 垩白度 Chalky degree | 垩白率 Chalky rate | 蛋白质 含量 Protein content | 直链淀 粉含量 Amylose content | 胶稠度 Gel consistency | 粒长 Grain length | 长宽比 Aspect ratio | 透明度 Transpar- ency |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有效穗数 Effective panicles | 1.000 | ||||||||||||||
穗粒数 Kernels per panicle | -0.644* | 1.000 | |||||||||||||
千粒重 1 000-grain weight | 0.076 | -0.609* | 1.000 | ||||||||||||
产量 Yield | 0.123 | 0.274 | 0.185 | 1.000 | |||||||||||
糙米率 Brown rice rate | 0.490 | -0.529 | 0.576 | 0.496 | 1.000 | ||||||||||
整精米率 Head rice rate | 0.588 | -0.135 | 0.018 | 0.560 | 0.613* | 1.000 | |||||||||
精米率 Milled rice rate | 0.518 | -0.410 | 0.392 | 0.598 | 0.869** | 0.785** | 1.000 | ||||||||
垩白度 Chalky degree | 0.169 | -0.038 | 0.208 | 0.538 | 0.687* | 0.379 | 0.477 | 1.000 | |||||||
垩白率 Chalky rate | 0.253 | -0.007 | 0.146 | 0.631* | 0.558 | 0.275 | 0.439 | 0.885** | 1.000 | ||||||
蛋白质含量 Protein content | 0.062 | -0.375 | 0.230 | -0.400 | -0.276 | -0.251 | -0.279 | -0.379 | -0.320 | 1.000 | |||||
直链淀粉含量 Amylose content | 0.056 | -0.355 | 0.452 | 0.082 | 0.154 | -0.413 | 0.038 | 0.306 | 0.537 | 0.160 | 1.000 | ||||
胶稠度 Gel consistency | 0.260 | 0.151 | 0.064 | 0.712* | 0.583 | 0.716* | 0.548 | 0.781** | 0.629* | -0.449 | -0.108 | 1.000 | |||
粒长 Grain length | -0.041 | -0.522 | 0.662* | -0.308 | -0.096 | -0.326 | -0.109 | -0.334 | -0.290 | 0.535 | 0.469 | -0.421 | 1.000 | ||
长宽比 Aspect ratio | -0.224 | -0.351 | 0.557 | -0.352 | -0.273 | -0.461 | -0.291 | -0.389 | -0.364 | 0.587 | 0.430 | -0.471 | 0.967** | 1.000 | |
透明度 Transparency | -0.163 | -0.235 | 0.120 | -0.372 | 0.294 | -0.209 | 0.040 | 0.203 | 0.058 | -0.032 | -0.018 | -0.228 | -0.202 | -0.246 | 1.000 |
Tab.4 Correlation analysis of yield and quality traits among different aromatic rice varieties
相关性 Correlation | 有效穗数 Effective panicles | 穗粒数 Kernels per panicle | 千粒重 1000- grain weight | 产量 Yield | 糙米率 Brown rice rate | 精米率 Milled rice rate | 整精米率 Head rice rate | 垩白度 Chalky degree | 垩白率 Chalky rate | 蛋白质 含量 Protein content | 直链淀 粉含量 Amylose content | 胶稠度 Gel consistency | 粒长 Grain length | 长宽比 Aspect ratio | 透明度 Transpar- ency |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有效穗数 Effective panicles | 1.000 | ||||||||||||||
穗粒数 Kernels per panicle | -0.644* | 1.000 | |||||||||||||
千粒重 1 000-grain weight | 0.076 | -0.609* | 1.000 | ||||||||||||
产量 Yield | 0.123 | 0.274 | 0.185 | 1.000 | |||||||||||
糙米率 Brown rice rate | 0.490 | -0.529 | 0.576 | 0.496 | 1.000 | ||||||||||
整精米率 Head rice rate | 0.588 | -0.135 | 0.018 | 0.560 | 0.613* | 1.000 | |||||||||
精米率 Milled rice rate | 0.518 | -0.410 | 0.392 | 0.598 | 0.869** | 0.785** | 1.000 | ||||||||
垩白度 Chalky degree | 0.169 | -0.038 | 0.208 | 0.538 | 0.687* | 0.379 | 0.477 | 1.000 | |||||||
垩白率 Chalky rate | 0.253 | -0.007 | 0.146 | 0.631* | 0.558 | 0.275 | 0.439 | 0.885** | 1.000 | ||||||
蛋白质含量 Protein content | 0.062 | -0.375 | 0.230 | -0.400 | -0.276 | -0.251 | -0.279 | -0.379 | -0.320 | 1.000 | |||||
直链淀粉含量 Amylose content | 0.056 | -0.355 | 0.452 | 0.082 | 0.154 | -0.413 | 0.038 | 0.306 | 0.537 | 0.160 | 1.000 | ||||
胶稠度 Gel consistency | 0.260 | 0.151 | 0.064 | 0.712* | 0.583 | 0.716* | 0.548 | 0.781** | 0.629* | -0.449 | -0.108 | 1.000 | |||
粒长 Grain length | -0.041 | -0.522 | 0.662* | -0.308 | -0.096 | -0.326 | -0.109 | -0.334 | -0.290 | 0.535 | 0.469 | -0.421 | 1.000 | ||
长宽比 Aspect ratio | -0.224 | -0.351 | 0.557 | -0.352 | -0.273 | -0.461 | -0.291 | -0.389 | -0.364 | 0.587 | 0.430 | -0.471 | 0.967** | 1.000 | |
透明度 Transparency | -0.163 | -0.235 | 0.120 | -0.372 | 0.294 | -0.209 | 0.040 | 0.203 | 0.058 | -0.032 | -0.018 | -0.228 | -0.202 | -0.246 | 1.000 |
主成分 Principal component | 初始特征值 Initial eigenvalues | 提取载荷平方和 Extraction sums of squared loadings | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总计 Total | 方差百分比 Variance(%) | 累积 Cumulative(%) | 总计 Total | 方差百分比 Variance(%) | 累积 Cumulative(%) | |
1 | 5.582 | 37.212 | 37.212 | 5.582 | 37.212 | 37.212 |
2 | 3.620 | 24.137 | 61.348 | 3.620 | 24.137 | 61.348 |
3 | 1.889 | 12.593 | 73.941 | 1.889 | 12.593 | 73.941 |
4 | 1.625 | 10.835 | 84.776 | 1.625 | 10.835 | 84.776 |
5 | 0.993 | 6.617 | 91.393 | |||
6 | 0.580 | 3.868 | 95.261 | |||
7 | 0.412 | 2.746 | 98.007 | |||
8 | 0.188 | 1.252 | 99.259 | |||
9 | 0.080 | 0.530 | 99.789 | |||
10 | 0.032 | 0.211 | 100.000 |
Tab.5 Principal component eigenvalues
主成分 Principal component | 初始特征值 Initial eigenvalues | 提取载荷平方和 Extraction sums of squared loadings | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总计 Total | 方差百分比 Variance(%) | 累积 Cumulative(%) | 总计 Total | 方差百分比 Variance(%) | 累积 Cumulative(%) | |
1 | 5.582 | 37.212 | 37.212 | 5.582 | 37.212 | 37.212 |
2 | 3.620 | 24.137 | 61.348 | 3.620 | 24.137 | 61.348 |
3 | 1.889 | 12.593 | 73.941 | 1.889 | 12.593 | 73.941 |
4 | 1.625 | 10.835 | 84.776 | 1.625 | 10.835 | 84.776 |
5 | 0.993 | 6.617 | 91.393 | |||
6 | 0.580 | 3.868 | 95.261 | |||
7 | 0.412 | 2.746 | 98.007 | |||
8 | 0.188 | 1.252 | 99.259 | |||
9 | 0.080 | 0.530 | 99.789 | |||
10 | 0.032 | 0.211 | 100.000 |
品种 Variety | 因子1 Factor 1 | 因子2 Factor 2 | 因子3 Factor 3 | 因子4 Factor 4 | 主成分1 PC 1 | 主成分2 PC 2 | 主成分3 PC 3 | 主成分4 PC 4 | 综合得分 Composite score | 排序 Order |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新粳香53号 Xinjingxiang 53 | -0.797 6 | -2.494 2 | 0.405 0 | 0.447 3 | -1.884 4 | -4.745 5 | 0.556 7 | 0.570 1 | -2.022 6 | 11 |
新粳香83号 Xinjingxiang 83 | -0.630 2 | 0.770 2 | -1.522 7 | 0.503 2 | -1.488 8 | 1.465 4 | -2.092 8 | 0.641 4 | -0.465 3 | 8 |
新粳香2号 Xinjingxiang 2 | -0.560 4 | 1.490 7 | -0.090 9 | 0.817 9 | -1.324 0 | 2.836 2 | -0.124 9 | 1.042 6 | 0.340 9 | 4 |
新粳香6号 Xinjingxiang 6 | 1.140 4 | 0.061 9 | -0.384 8 | -0.157 9 | 2.694 4 | 0.117 7 | -0.528 9 | -0.201 3 | 1.112 0 | 2 |
新粳香8号 Xinjingxiang 8 | 1.114 6 | -0.305 9 | -0.548 6 | -1.725 2 | 2.633 5 | -0.582 0 | -0.754 0 | -2.199 2 | 0.597 3 | 3 |
新粳香5号 Xinjingxiang 5 | -1.185 9 | 0.345 2 | 1.059 1 | 0.395 8 | -2.801 8 | 0.656 8 | 1.455 6 | 0.504 5 | -0.762 2 | 9 |
新粳香1号 Xinjingxiang 1 | -1.060 6 | 0.509 1 | 0.728 8 | -2.150 9 | -2.505 9 | 0.968 7 | 1.001 7 | -2.741 8 | -1.025 8 | 10 |
新稻50号 Xindao 50 | 0.478 2 | -0.295 7 | -1.187 5 | 0.207 4 | 1.129 8 | -0.562 5 | -1.632 0 | 0.264 4 | 0.127 2 | 5 |
新粳8号 Xinjing 8 | -0.316 2 | 0.022 6 | 0.573 4 | 0.277 8 | -0.747 1 | 0.043 0 | 0.788 1 | 0.354 2 | -0.153 4 | 6 |
新粳伊20号 XinJingyi 20 | 1.802 7 | 0.392 3 | 1.748 9 | 0.778 2 | 4.259 0 | 0.746 4 | 2.403 7 | 0.992 0 | 2.565 9 | 1 |
新粳伊3号 Xinjingyi 3 | 0.014 9 | -0.496 3 | -0.780 9 | 0.606 5 | 0.035 3 | -0.944 2 | -1.073 3 | 0.773 1 | -0.313 9 | 7 |
Tab.6 Composite score of principal component and order of different aromatic rice varieties
品种 Variety | 因子1 Factor 1 | 因子2 Factor 2 | 因子3 Factor 3 | 因子4 Factor 4 | 主成分1 PC 1 | 主成分2 PC 2 | 主成分3 PC 3 | 主成分4 PC 4 | 综合得分 Composite score | 排序 Order |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新粳香53号 Xinjingxiang 53 | -0.797 6 | -2.494 2 | 0.405 0 | 0.447 3 | -1.884 4 | -4.745 5 | 0.556 7 | 0.570 1 | -2.022 6 | 11 |
新粳香83号 Xinjingxiang 83 | -0.630 2 | 0.770 2 | -1.522 7 | 0.503 2 | -1.488 8 | 1.465 4 | -2.092 8 | 0.641 4 | -0.465 3 | 8 |
新粳香2号 Xinjingxiang 2 | -0.560 4 | 1.490 7 | -0.090 9 | 0.817 9 | -1.324 0 | 2.836 2 | -0.124 9 | 1.042 6 | 0.340 9 | 4 |
新粳香6号 Xinjingxiang 6 | 1.140 4 | 0.061 9 | -0.384 8 | -0.157 9 | 2.694 4 | 0.117 7 | -0.528 9 | -0.201 3 | 1.112 0 | 2 |
新粳香8号 Xinjingxiang 8 | 1.114 6 | -0.305 9 | -0.548 6 | -1.725 2 | 2.633 5 | -0.582 0 | -0.754 0 | -2.199 2 | 0.597 3 | 3 |
新粳香5号 Xinjingxiang 5 | -1.185 9 | 0.345 2 | 1.059 1 | 0.395 8 | -2.801 8 | 0.656 8 | 1.455 6 | 0.504 5 | -0.762 2 | 9 |
新粳香1号 Xinjingxiang 1 | -1.060 6 | 0.509 1 | 0.728 8 | -2.150 9 | -2.505 9 | 0.968 7 | 1.001 7 | -2.741 8 | -1.025 8 | 10 |
新稻50号 Xindao 50 | 0.478 2 | -0.295 7 | -1.187 5 | 0.207 4 | 1.129 8 | -0.562 5 | -1.632 0 | 0.264 4 | 0.127 2 | 5 |
新粳8号 Xinjing 8 | -0.316 2 | 0.022 6 | 0.573 4 | 0.277 8 | -0.747 1 | 0.043 0 | 0.788 1 | 0.354 2 | -0.153 4 | 6 |
新粳伊20号 XinJingyi 20 | 1.802 7 | 0.392 3 | 1.748 9 | 0.778 2 | 4.259 0 | 0.746 4 | 2.403 7 | 0.992 0 | 2.565 9 | 1 |
新粳伊3号 Xinjingyi 3 | 0.014 9 | -0.496 3 | -0.780 9 | 0.606 5 | 0.035 3 | -0.944 2 | -1.073 3 | 0.773 1 | -0.313 9 | 7 |
[1] |
Patel D P, Das A, Munda G C, et al. Evaluation of yield and physiological attributes of high-yielding rice varieties under aerobic and flood-irrigated management practices in mid-hills ecosystem[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2010, 97(9):1269-1276.
DOI URL |
[2] |
ZHANG Huimin, XU Minggang, SHI Xiaojun, et al. Rice yield, potassium uptake and apparent balance under long-term fertilization in rice-based cropping systems in Southern China[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2010, 88(3): 341-349.
DOI URL |
[3] | 于深州, 赵一洲, 王绍林, 等. 不同育种方法对粳型香稻早世代外观品质性状的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2021, 34(5):915-920. |
YU Shenzhou, ZHAO Yizhou, WANG Shaolin, et al. Effects of different breeding methods on appearance quality traits of early generations of japonica aromatic rice[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 34(5): 915-920. | |
[4] |
布哈丽且木·阿不力孜, 袁杰, 朱小霞, 等. 新疆稻区优质丰产水稻品种筛选与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(11): 2108-2117.
DOI |
Buhaliqiemu Abulizi, YUAN Jie, ZHU Xiaoxia, et al. Screening and evaluation of high-quality and high-yield rice varieties in ecological regions of Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(11): 2108-2117.
DOI |
|
[5] |
Lau W C P, Rafii M Y, Ismail M R, et al. Review of functional markers for improving cooking, eating, and the nutritional qualities of rice[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2015, 6:832.
DOI PMID |
[6] |
Mo Zhaowen, Li Wu, Pan Shenggang, et al. Shading during the grain filling period increases 2-acetyl-1- pyrroline content in fragrant rice[J]. Rice, 2015, 8(1): 9.
DOI URL |
[7] |
曾仁杰. 不同播期对优质稻玉针香产量及稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2020, 26(6): 100-103.
DOI |
ZENG Renjie. Effects of different sowing dates on the yield and grain quality of yuzhenxiang[J]. China Rice, 2020, 26(6): 100-103.
DOI |
|
[8] |
韦小珊, 梁俭伟, 张集胜, 等. 不同灌溉方式对香稻产量品质及水分利用率的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2020, 35(4): 129-136.
DOI |
WEI Xiaoshan, LIANG Jianwei, ZHANG Jisheng, et al. Effects of different irrigation methods on yield, quality and water use efficiency of fragrant rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2020, 35(4): 129-136. | |
[9] |
邢丕鹏, 刘金海, 罗昊文, 等. 有机栽培条件下不同机械种植方式对香稻产量、品质以及香气的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(5): 41-44.
DOI |
XING Pipeng, LIU Jinhai, LUO Haowen, et al. Effects of different mechanical planting methods on yield, quality and aroma of fragrant rice under organic cultivation conditions[J]. China Rice, 2021, 27(5): 41-44.
DOI |
|
[10] |
宫彦龙, 雷月, 闫志强, 等. 收获期对优质稻大粒香品质性状的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2020, 26(3): 81-83.
DOI |
GONG Yanlong, LEI Yue, YAN Zhiqiang, et al. Effects of harvesting time on quality traits of high quality rice variety Dalixiang[J]. China Rice, 2020, 26(3): 81-83.
DOI |
|
[11] | 刘化龙, 张宇, 邹德堂, 等. 香稻种质资源筛选及香味基因遗传研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2014, 30(6): 21-26. |
Liu Hualong, Zhang Yu, Zou Detang, et al. Screening for aromatic rice germplasm resources and genetic research of fragrance gene[J]. Crops, 2014, 30(6): 21-26. | |
[12] | 彭波, 于静波, 何璐璐, 等. 豫南香稻种质资源稻米氨基酸含量的检测与分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32(7): 1524-1530. |
PENG Bo, YU Jingbo, HE Lulu, et al. Detection and analysis of amino acid contents of fragrant rice germplasm resources in south of Henan province[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 32(7): 1524-1530. | |
[13] |
魏晓东, 张亚东, 赵凌, 等. 稻米香味物质2-乙酰-1-吡咯啉的形成及其影响因素[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(2): 131-138.
DOI |
WEI Xiaodong, ZHANG Yadong, ZHAO Ling, et al. Research progress in biosynthesis and influencing factors of 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline in fragrant rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2022, 36(2): 131-138.
DOI |
|
[14] | 王远征, 王晓菁, 李源, 等. 北方粳稻产量与品质性状及其相互关系分析[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(6): 910-918. |
WANG Yuanzheng, WANG Xiaojing, LI Yuan, et al. Analysis of yield and quality traits and their relationship in japonica rice in Northern China[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2015, 41(6): 910-918.
DOI URL |
|
[15] | 韩瑞才, 文春燕, 沈显华, 等. 藏区不同类型水稻品种产量和稻米品质特性分析[J]. 江西农业学报, 2021, 33(11): 1-7. |
HAN Ruicai, WEN Chunyan, SHEN Xianhua, et al. Analysis of yield and rice quality characteristics of different types of rice varieties in Tibetan Area[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2021, 33(11): 1-7. | |
[16] | 陈重远, 张大双, 张习春, 等. 基于主成分分析和聚类分析对籼稻资源品质性状的综合评价[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(24): 8330-8340. |
CHEN Zhongyuan, ZHANG Dashuang, ZHANG Xichun, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of quality traits of indica rice resources based on PCA and CA[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2021, 19(24): 8330-8340. | |
[17] |
毛红艳, 徐鑫, 于明. 新疆地区玉米品种营养品质主成分分析与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(10): 1909-1915.
DOI |
MAO Hongyan, XU Xin, YU Ying. Principal component analysis and evaluation of nutritional quality of maize cultivars in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(10): 1909-1915.
DOI |
|
[18] | LYU Hongbin, QIAN Min, LI Chaohua, et al. The principal component analysis on yielding and agronomic traits of hybrid rice of liangyou 2111[J]. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2017, 18(3): 483-486. |
[1] | JIN Juan, LI lili, YANG Lei, FAN Dingyu, HAO Qing. Analysis on the Development status of Xinjiang Jujube Industry [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 106-110. |
[2] | WU Yating, CHEN He, ZHENG Nan, MA Xianlan, ZHOU Lina, ZHAO Yankun. Current situation and development trend prospect of Xinjiang characteristic dairy industry [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 158-162. |
[3] | HOU Xianzheng, XIAO Tong, CHEN Yulan, WEI Jiyu. The spatial effects and mechanism of digital technology innovation on agricultural economic resilience [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 196-205. |
[4] | YUE Rongqiang, ZHANG Qiong, WANG Fang, DENG Wenwen, CHEN Yu, Maiwulanjiang Mamut, Nurmanquli Batur. Improve the academic quality and influence of agricultural academic journals [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 256-260. |
[5] | WANG Junduo, CUI Yujiang, LIANG Yajun, GONG Zhaolong, ZHENG Junyun, LI Xueyuan. Xinjiang cotton production advantageous regional layout scheme [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 60-69. |
[6] | FANG Hui, DING Yindeng, FAN Guiqiang, GAO Yonghong, HUANG Tianrong. Research report on the development status of wheat industry in southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 75-80. |
[7] | YANG Minghua, LIAO Biyong, LIU Qiang, PENG Yuncheng, Dawulai Jiekeshan, FENG Guorui, TANG Shimin. Study on variation of grain nutritional quality of glutinous maize [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2087-2093. |
[8] | ZHANG Zehua, YE Hanchun, WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao, LI Haiqiang, LIU Jian. Effects of equal nitrogen applied with urease inhibitor on cotton growth, yield, and quality under mulched drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111. |
[9] | CHEN Ruijie, LUO Linyi, RUAN Xiangyang, YE Jun. Effects of humic acid on soil nutrients, cotton yield and quality in cotton fields under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121. |
[10] | HUANG Boxuan, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, SHAO Jingjing, FENG Weina, PANG Chaoyou, XU Wenxiu, DONG Helin. Effects of different nitrogen inhibitors on growth, nitrogen utilization and yield of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131. |
[11] | LIU Jing, DU Mingchuan, ZHANG Wenting, BAO Haijuan, JING Meiling, DU Wenhua. Screening of triticale germplasm in different areas of Qinghai [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2183-2190. |
[12] | TIAN Haiyan, ZHANG Zhanqin, XIE Jianhui, WANG Jianjiang, YANG Xiangkun. Study on the relationship between Lycopene and main quality characters of processing tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2197-2202. |
[13] | Areziguli Tuxun, GAO Jie. Effects of drought stress and planting density on physiological characteristics and yield of onion bulblets [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2211-2222. |
[14] | ZHANG Tingjun, LI Zihui, CUI Yujiang, SUN Xiaogui, CHEN Fang. Effects of microbial agents on cotton growth and soil physico-chemical properties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2269-2276. |
[15] | CHEN Fang, LI Zihui, SUNXiaogui , ZHANG Tingjun. Different dosage of microbial agents on the yield and quality of processed tomatoes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 51
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 204
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||