Responses of morphological characteristics of cotton to different water conditions

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.09.005

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 To clarify the response of cotton morphological characteristics to different water conditions in Xinjiang in the hope of providing scientific basis for establishing cotton moisture diagnosis technology based on morphological characteristics.【Methods】 The field experiment method was used to set different water treatments (100%, 85%, 75%, 60% of the normal drip irrigation amount) to observe the changes of cotton morphological characteristics (distance of top petioles, angle stem-petiole, angle leaves) and plant water content during the irrigation period under the normal drip irrigation condition at the bud stage, the flowering and bolling stage, and meanwhile the differences of cotton morphological characteristics under different irrigation amounts were compared.【Results】 (1) In an irrigation cycle at the bud stage, after irrigation, the angle between petiole and water content of cotton plants decreased with time, and the distance between the top two leaves increased with time; There were differences in plant morphology among different irrigation treatments, and the leaf angle decreased slightly with the decrease of irrigation amount.(2) In an irrigation cycle at flowering and bolling stage, after irrigation, the angle between petiole and water content of cotton plants decreased with time, while the distance between the top two leaves and the angle between leaves increased with time.There were differences in plant morphology among different irrigation treatments.The distance between the top two leaves and the angle between leaves increased with the decrease of irrigation amount, while the angle between petioles decreased with the decrease of irrigation amount.(3) Correlation analysis showed that the distance between the top two leaves was negatively correlated with plant moisture content, and the angle between petioles was positively correlated with plant moisture content.【Conclusion】 To sum up, the distance between the top two leaves, the angle between petioles and the angle between leaves of cotton have a good response law to the cotton water situation at the bud stage and the flowering and bolling stage, which can be used as the basis for cotton water diagnosis in the field.

Key words: cotton; morphological characteristics; rate of water content; moisture diagnosis

摘要：

【目的】研究新疆棉花形态特征对不同水分状况的响应,为棉花水分特征的识别和科学灌溉提供参考。【方法】采用大田试验的方法,设置不同水分处理(正常滴灌量的100%、85%、75%、60%),在花蕾期和花铃期,观测正常滴灌条件下灌水周期内棉花形态特征(顶两叶距离、叶柄夹角、叶夹角)和植株含水量的变化,并比较不同灌溉量处理下棉花形态特征差异。【结果】(1)在花蕾期一个灌溉周期,灌水后叶柄夹角和棉花植株含水量表现出随时间延长而降低趋势,顶两叶距离表现出随时间延长而增加的趋势;不同灌溉量处理间植株形态存在差异,叶夹角随灌水量降低而略微降低。(2)在花铃期一个灌溉周期,灌水后叶柄夹角和棉花植株含水量表现出随时间延长而降低趋势,顶两叶距离和叶夹角表现出随时间延长而增加的趋势;不同灌溉量处理间植株形态存在差异,顶两叶距离和叶夹角随灌溉量降低而增加,叶柄夹角随灌溉量降低而降低。(3)相关分析表明,顶两叶距离与植株含水率呈显著负相关,叶柄夹角与植株含水率呈显著正相关。【结论】棉花花蕾期和花铃期,棉花形态特征指标顶两叶距离、叶柄夹角以及叶夹角对棉花水分均有较好的响应规律,可以作为大田棉花水分诊断依据。

关键词: 棉花, 形态特征, 含水率, 水分诊断

CLC Number:

S562

YANG Chuan, ZHANG Kai, CHEN Bing, ZHANG Hui, LIU Ping, CHANG Song, SHENG Jiandong. Responses of morphological characteristics of cotton to different water conditions[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2120-2127.

杨川, 张凯, 陈冰, 张慧, 柳萍, 常松, 盛建东. 棉花植株形态特征对不同水分状况的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2120-2127.

Figures/Tables 7

References 23

[1]	闫建峰. 新疆维吾尔自治区棉花生产现状及发展对策[J]. 乡村科技, 2020, 11(22): 47-48.
	YAN Jianfeng. Present situation and development countermeasures of cotton production in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region[J]. Xiang Cun Ke Ji, 2020, 11(22): 47-48.
[2]	李雪源, 王俊铎, 郑巨云, 等. 新疆棉花产业发展与供给侧改革[J]. 中国棉花, 2017, 44(8): 1-7.
	LI Xueyuan, WANG Junduo, ZHENG Juyun, et al. Cotton industry development and the supply-side reformin Xinjiang, China[J]. China Cotton, 2017, 44(8): 1-7.
[3]	郑媛芳. 新疆水资源分布及脆弱性评价[J]. 2018: 39-41.
	ZHENG Yuanfang. Distribution and vulnerability assessment of water resources in Xinjiang[J]. Shaanxi Water Resources, 2018: 39-41.
[4]	郑力嘉, 孙宇瑞, 蔡祥. 基于激光扫描3D图像的植物亏水体态辨识与萎蔫指数比较[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(2): 79-86.
	ZHENG Lijia, SUN Yurui, CAI Xiang. Comparison of plant water deficit posture identification and wilting index based on laser scanning 3D images[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(2): 79-86.
[5]	张智韬, 边江, 韩文霆, 等. 无人机热红外图像计算冠层温度特征数诊断棉花水分胁迫[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(15): 77-84.
	ZHANG Zhitao, BIAN Jiang, HAN Wenting, et al. Diagnosis of cotton water stress by calculating canopy temperature characteristic number from UAV thermal infrared image[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(15): 77-84.
[6]	尚晓英, 张智韬, 边江, 等. 基于无人机热红外的水分胁迫指数与土壤含水率关系研究[J]. 节水灌溉, 2019, 284(4): 16-21.
	SHANG Xiaoying, ZHANG Zhitao, BIAN Jiang, et al. Study on the relationship between water stress index and soil moisture content based on UAV thermal infrared[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2019, 284(4): 16-21.
[7]	Jones H G. Use of Infrared Thermometry for Estimation of Stomatal Conductance as a Possible Aid to Irrigation Scheduling[J]. Agricultural & Forest Meteorology, 1999, 95(3): 139-149.
[8]	王娟. 基于计算机视觉的棉花干旱诊断研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2014.
	WANG Juan. Research on Cotton Drought Diagnosis Based on Computer Vision[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2014.
[9]	吴晓磊, 张寄阳, 刘浩, 等. 基于红外热像仪的棉花水分状况诊断方法[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(1): 165-172.
	WU Xiaolei, ZHANG Jiyang, LIU Hao, et al. Diagnosis method of cotton water status based on infrared thermal imaging[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(1): 165-172. PMID
[10]	王方永, 王克如, 王崇桃, 等. 基于图像识别的棉花水分状况诊断研究[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, (4): 404-407.
	WANG Fangyong, WANG Keru, WANG Chongtao, et al. Research on cotton moisture condition diagnosis based on image recognition[J]. Journal of Shihezi University (Natural Science Ed.), 2007,(4): 404-407.
[11]	张寄阳, 段爱旺, 孟兆江, 等. 不同水分状况下棉花茎直径变化规律研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2005, (5): 7-11.
	ZHANG Jiyang, DUAN Aiwang, MENG Zhangjiang, et al. Stem diameter Variations of cotton under different Water conditions[J]. Transactions of Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2005, (5): 7-11.
[12]	李志博, 徐建伟, 李衡, 等. 后期持续干旱对北疆棉花生长发育的影响及其抗旱适应性评价[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2014, 32(3): 45-49, 82.
	LI Zhibo, XU Jianwei, LI Heng, et al. Effect of persistent drought on cotton growth and development in northern Xinjiang and its drought-resistant adaptability evaluation[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2014, 32(3): 45-49, 82.
[13]	肖俊夫, 刘祖贵, 孙景生, 等. 不同生育期干旱对棉花生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 灌溉排水, 1999,(1): 24-28.
	XIAO Junfu, LIU Zugui, SUN Jingsheng, et al. Effects of drought at different growth stages on cotton growth and yield[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 1999,(1): 24-28.
[14]	龙海燕, 邓伦秀. 植物形态对干旱胁迫的反应与适应性研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2019, 58(8): 5-7.
	LONG Haiyan, DENG Lunxiu. Response and adaptability of plant morphology to drought stress[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 58(8): 5-7.
[15]	高阳. 土壤水分梯度变化对内蒙古典型草原草本植物形态及成分的影响[D]. 北京: 中央民族大学, 2021.
	GAO Yang. Effects of soil moisture gradient on the morphology and composition of herbaceous plants in typical grasslands of Inner Mongolia[D]. Beijing: Minzu University of China, 2021.
[16]	冯先伟, 陈曦, 包安明, 等. 水分胁迫条件下棉花生理变化及其高光谱响应分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2004,(2): 250-255.
	FENG Xianwei, CHEN Xi, BAO Anming, et al. Physiological changes and hyperspectral response analysis of cotton under water stress[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2004,(2): 250-255.
[17]	李彦, 雷晓云, 白云岗. 不同灌水下限对棉花产量及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2013, 32(4): 132-134.
	LI Yan, LEI Xiaoyun, BAI Yungang. Effects of different irrigation limits on cotton yield and water use efficiency[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2013, 32(4): 132-134.
[18]	郭金强, 危常州, 侯振安, 等. 北疆棉花膜下滴灌耗水规律的研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2005, 42(4): 205-209.
	GUO Jinqiang, WEI Changzhou, HOU Zhen 'an, et al. Study on water consumption law of drip irrigation under plastic film for cotton in northern Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2005, 42(4): 205-209.
[19]	江柱, 张江辉, 白云岗, 等. 不同灌水频率水分胁迫对北疆棉花生长及产量的影响[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2021,(5): 49-54.
	JIANG Zhu, ZHANG Jianghui, BAI Yungang, et al. Effects of water stress with different irrigation frequencies on cotton growth and yield in northern Xinjiang[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2021,(5): 49-54.
[20]	赵燕东, 刘贺, 刘卫平. 基于叶片分形维数的植物亏水胁迫萎蔫体态测量方法[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(9): 191-195.
	ZHAO Yandong, LIU He, LIU Weiping. Measurement method of plant wilting posture under water deficit stress based on fractal dimension of leaves[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2011, 27(9): 191-195.
[21]	吕新, 张伟, 王登伟, 等. 棉花冠层对不同灌水量的反应[J]. 棉花学报, 2004,(1): 21-25.
	LYU Xin, ZHANG Wei, WANG Dengwei, et al. Response of cotton canopy to different irrigation amounts[J]. Cotton Science, 2004,(1): 21-25.
[22]	张伟, 吕新. 棉花冠层对不同灌水量的反应及其产量形成研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2004,(4): 425-429.
	ZHANG Wei, LYU Xin. Response of cotton canopy to different irrigation amount and its yield formation[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2004,(4): 425-429.
[23]	张世民. 调亏灌溉对棉花生长生理和产量的影响[D], 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学, 2017.
	Zhang Shimin. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on cotton growth physiology and yield[D]. Aral: Tarim University, 2017.

处理 Treatments	滴灌时间及滴灌量 Date and quantity of drip irrigation(m³/hm²)							滴灌总量 Total irrigation (m³/hm²)
处理 Treatments	5/10	6/13	6/26	7/13	7/22	7/30	8/10	滴灌总量 Total irrigation (m³/hm²)
W₁₀₀	650	807	323	344	286	229	432	3 071
W₈₅	650	682	271	292	245	193	354	2 687
W₇₅	650	641	250	219	193	177	292	2 422
W₆₀	650	490	167	151	139	125	234	1 956

处理 Treatments	滴灌时间及滴灌量 Date and quantity of drip irrigation(m³/hm²)							滴灌总量 Total irrigation (m³/hm²)
处理 Treatments	5/10	6/13	6/26	7/13	7/22	7/30	8/10	滴灌总量 Total irrigation (m³/hm²)
W₁₀₀	650	807	323	344	286	229	432	3 071
W₈₅	650	682	271	292	245	193	354	2 687
W₇₅	650	641	250	219	193	177	292	2 422
W₆₀	650	490	167	151	139	125	234	1 956

时间 Time	顶两叶距离 Distance of top petioles (cm)	叶柄夹角 Angle stem- petiole (°)	叶夹角 Angle leaf (°)
10:00~11:00	-0.441^**	0.436^**	0.034
13:00~14:00	-0.370^**	0.322^**	0.231
16:00~17:00	-0.569^**	0.351^**	0.307^*
19:00~20:00	-0.434^**	0.304^**	0.104

时间 Time	顶两叶距离 Distance of top petioles (cm)	叶柄夹角 Angle stem- petiole (°)	叶夹角 Angle leaf (°)
10:00~11:00	-0.441^**	0.436^**	0.034
13:00~14:00	-0.370^**	0.322^**	0.231
16:00~17:00	-0.569^**	0.351^**	0.307^*
19:00~20:00	-0.434^**	0.304^**	0.104

生育期 Reproductive period		顶两叶距离 Distance of top petioles (cm)	叶柄夹角 Angle stem- petiole (°)	叶夹角 Angle leaf (°)
花蕾期 Bud stage	植株含水率	-0.569^**	0.351^**	0.307^*
	叶含水率	-0.481^**	0.311^**	0.365^**
	茎含水率	-0.557^**	0.340^**	0.370^**
	根含水率	-0.570^**	0.319^**	0.396^**
花铃期 Flowering and boll stage	植株含水率	-0.382^**	0.381^**	-0.387^**
	叶含水率	-0.217^*	0.226^*	-0.247^*
	茎含水率	-0.405^**	0.396^**	-0.402^**
	根含水率	-0.403^**	0.400^**	-0.393^**