Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (8): 1931-1939.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.08.014
• Horticultural Special Local Products · Agricultural Product Processing Engineering • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Chao1,2(), BAI Yungang2(
), ZHENG Ming2, XIAO Jun2, DING Ping2
Received:
2022-11-25
Online:
2023-08-20
Published:
2023-08-14
Correspondence author:
BAI Yungang (1974-), male, Han nationality, Qitai Xinjiang, Ph.D, a professor Engineering, mainly engaged in research on agricultural water conservation,(E-mail)xjbaiyg@sina.comSupported by:
张超1,2(), 白云岗2(
), 郑明2, 肖军2, 丁平2
通讯作者:
白云岗(1974-),男,新疆奇台人,教授级高级工程师,博士,研究方向为农业节水,(E-mail)xjbaiyg@sina.com作者简介:
张超(1996-),男,山东济南人,硕士研究生,研究方向为农业资源高效利用,(E-mail)Zhangc2492@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
ZHANG Chao, BAI Yungang, ZHENG Ming, XIAO Jun, DING Ping. Synergistic effect of water and fertilizer on grape in extreme arid area[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1931-1939.
张超, 白云岗, 郑明, 肖军, 丁平. 极端干旱区葡萄水肥协同效应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1931-1939.
处理 Treatments | 萌芽-展叶期 Bud-leafing stage | 膨大-成熟期 Expansion-maturation stage | 总灌水量 The total irrigation water | 总施氮量 Total ammonia application | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W (m3/hm2) | N (kg/hm2) | W (m3/hm2) | N (kg/hm2) | W (m3/hm2) | N (kg/hm2) | |
W1N1 | 1 875 | 144 | 4 500 | 36 | 6 375 | 180 |
W2N2 | 1 875 | 144 | 6 300 | 48 | 8 175 | 192 |
W3N3 | 1 875 | 144 | 8 100 | 60 | 9 975 | 204 |
W4N4 | 2 625 | 192 | 4 500 | 36 | 7 127 | 228 |
W5N5 | 2 625 | 192 | 6 300 | 48 | 8 925 | 240 |
W6N6 | 2 625 | 192 | 8 100 | 60 | 10 725 | 252 |
W7N7 | 3 375 | 240 | 4 500 | 36 | 7 875 | 276 |
W8N8 | 3 375 | 240 | 6 300 | 48 | 9 675 | 288 |
W9N9 | 3 375 | 240 | 8 100 | 60 | 12 475 | 300 |
Tab.1 Test the amount of irrigation and fertilizer
处理 Treatments | 萌芽-展叶期 Bud-leafing stage | 膨大-成熟期 Expansion-maturation stage | 总灌水量 The total irrigation water | 总施氮量 Total ammonia application | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W (m3/hm2) | N (kg/hm2) | W (m3/hm2) | N (kg/hm2) | W (m3/hm2) | N (kg/hm2) | |
W1N1 | 1 875 | 144 | 4 500 | 36 | 6 375 | 180 |
W2N2 | 1 875 | 144 | 6 300 | 48 | 8 175 | 192 |
W3N3 | 1 875 | 144 | 8 100 | 60 | 9 975 | 204 |
W4N4 | 2 625 | 192 | 4 500 | 36 | 7 127 | 228 |
W5N5 | 2 625 | 192 | 6 300 | 48 | 8 925 | 240 |
W6N6 | 2 625 | 192 | 8 100 | 60 | 10 725 | 252 |
W7N7 | 3 375 | 240 | 4 500 | 36 | 7 875 | 276 |
W8N8 | 3 375 | 240 | 6 300 | 48 | 9 675 | 288 |
W9N9 | 3 375 | 240 | 8 100 | 60 | 12 475 | 300 |
处理 Treatments | 展叶期中期 Middle leafing stage | 展叶期后期 Late leafing stage | 膨大期中期 Metaphase of enlargement | 膨大期后期 Late enlargement stage | 成熟期中期 Middle maturity | 成熟期后期 Late maturity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1N1 | 1.62±0.06c | 2.5±0.10c | 3.24±0.14e | 3.87±0.14c | 4.12±0.13c | 4.17±0.14d |
W2N2 | 1.73±0.12abc | 2.55±0.13c | 3.47±0.08cde | 4.20±0.08abc | 4.49±0.15bc | 4.53±0.10bcd |
W3N3 | 1.69±0.15bc | 2.62±0.13c | 3.56±0.10cd | 4.38±0.07abc | 4.64±0.23ab | 4.79±0.39abc |
W4N4 | 1.82±0.04abc | 3.16±0.17ab | 3.43±0.24de | 4.17±0.43bc | 4.26±0.37bc | 4.33±0.33cd |
W5N5 | 1.96±0.22abc | 3.03±0.11b | 3.61±0.18cd | 4.16±0.38bc | 4.32±0.30bc | 4.51±0.32bcd |
W6N6 | 1.79±0.05abc | 2.94±0.08b | 3.74±0.21bc | 4.34±0.11abc | 4.49±0.15bc | 4.70±0.17abc |
W7N7 | 2.03±0.34ab | 3.03±0.17b | 3.58±0.16cd | 4.21±0.19abc | 4.32±0.31bc | 4.43±0.21bcd |
W8N8 | 2.10±0.20a | 3.37±0.35a | 3.92±0.10ab | 4.52±0.06ab | 4.72±0.11ab | 4.91±0.12ab |
W9N9 | 2.08±0.30a | 3.26±0.15ab | 4.05±0.12a | 4.72±0.50a | 4.98±0.37a | 5.11±0.34a |
Tab.2 Effects of different water and fertilizer treatments on leaf area index of grape
处理 Treatments | 展叶期中期 Middle leafing stage | 展叶期后期 Late leafing stage | 膨大期中期 Metaphase of enlargement | 膨大期后期 Late enlargement stage | 成熟期中期 Middle maturity | 成熟期后期 Late maturity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1N1 | 1.62±0.06c | 2.5±0.10c | 3.24±0.14e | 3.87±0.14c | 4.12±0.13c | 4.17±0.14d |
W2N2 | 1.73±0.12abc | 2.55±0.13c | 3.47±0.08cde | 4.20±0.08abc | 4.49±0.15bc | 4.53±0.10bcd |
W3N3 | 1.69±0.15bc | 2.62±0.13c | 3.56±0.10cd | 4.38±0.07abc | 4.64±0.23ab | 4.79±0.39abc |
W4N4 | 1.82±0.04abc | 3.16±0.17ab | 3.43±0.24de | 4.17±0.43bc | 4.26±0.37bc | 4.33±0.33cd |
W5N5 | 1.96±0.22abc | 3.03±0.11b | 3.61±0.18cd | 4.16±0.38bc | 4.32±0.30bc | 4.51±0.32bcd |
W6N6 | 1.79±0.05abc | 2.94±0.08b | 3.74±0.21bc | 4.34±0.11abc | 4.49±0.15bc | 4.70±0.17abc |
W7N7 | 2.03±0.34ab | 3.03±0.17b | 3.58±0.16cd | 4.21±0.19abc | 4.32±0.31bc | 4.43±0.21bcd |
W8N8 | 2.10±0.20a | 3.37±0.35a | 3.92±0.10ab | 4.52±0.06ab | 4.72±0.11ab | 4.91±0.12ab |
W9N9 | 2.08±0.30a | 3.26±0.15ab | 4.05±0.12a | 4.72±0.50a | 4.98±0.37a | 5.11±0.34a |
处理 Treatments | 硬度 Hardness (kg/cm2) | 可溶性 固形物含量 Soluble solid content(%) | 可滴定酸含量 Titratable acid content(%) | 还原糖 Reducing sugar(g/L) | VC Vitamin C (10-2mg/100g) | 固酸比 Solid acid than |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1N1 | 1.18±0.12de | 22.16±0.62bc | 0.53±0.00cd | 191.80±0.30f | 17.26±0.50c | 41.80±1.17b |
W2N2 | 1.39±0.12abc | 23.00±0.39ab | 0.56±0.02abc | 198.87±0.35d | 19.01±0.38a | 41.34±1.46bc |
W3N3 | 1.32±0.03bcd | 22.24±0.61abc | 0.59±0.02a | 185.73±0.15g | 19.10±0.30a | 37.91±0.62d |
W4N4 | 1.25±0.02de | 23.05±1.32ab | 0.54±0.02bcd | 212.53±0.15a | 18.52±0.65ab | 42.67±1.15ab |
W5N5 | 1.47±0.06a | 23.31±0.05a | 0.52±0.01e | 212.63±0.06a | 19.29±0.26a | 44.84±0.84a |
W6N6 | 1.44±0.06abc | 23.04±0.10ab | 0.55±0.02bcd | 195.30±0.36e | 19.43±1.30a | 41.92±1.17b |
W7N7 | 1.16±0.11e | 23.28±0.20ab | 0.53±0.00cd | 205.40±0.10c | 17.09±0.47c | 43.92±0.38ab |
W8N8 | 1.46±0.02ab | 21.82±0.61c | 0.56±0.04abc | 208.87±0.35b | 17.81±0.88bc | 38.88±3.40cd |
W9N9 | 1.31±0.04cd | 20.78±0.20d | 0.57±0.02ab | 185.77±0.31g | 18.88±0.23ab | 36.28±1.66d |
Tab.3 Effects of different water and fertilizer treatments on grape quality at ripening stage
处理 Treatments | 硬度 Hardness (kg/cm2) | 可溶性 固形物含量 Soluble solid content(%) | 可滴定酸含量 Titratable acid content(%) | 还原糖 Reducing sugar(g/L) | VC Vitamin C (10-2mg/100g) | 固酸比 Solid acid than |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1N1 | 1.18±0.12de | 22.16±0.62bc | 0.53±0.00cd | 191.80±0.30f | 17.26±0.50c | 41.80±1.17b |
W2N2 | 1.39±0.12abc | 23.00±0.39ab | 0.56±0.02abc | 198.87±0.35d | 19.01±0.38a | 41.34±1.46bc |
W3N3 | 1.32±0.03bcd | 22.24±0.61abc | 0.59±0.02a | 185.73±0.15g | 19.10±0.30a | 37.91±0.62d |
W4N4 | 1.25±0.02de | 23.05±1.32ab | 0.54±0.02bcd | 212.53±0.15a | 18.52±0.65ab | 42.67±1.15ab |
W5N5 | 1.47±0.06a | 23.31±0.05a | 0.52±0.01e | 212.63±0.06a | 19.29±0.26a | 44.84±0.84a |
W6N6 | 1.44±0.06abc | 23.04±0.10ab | 0.55±0.02bcd | 195.30±0.36e | 19.43±1.30a | 41.92±1.17b |
W7N7 | 1.16±0.11e | 23.28±0.20ab | 0.53±0.00cd | 205.40±0.10c | 17.09±0.47c | 43.92±0.38ab |
W8N8 | 1.46±0.02ab | 21.82±0.61c | 0.56±0.04abc | 208.87±0.35b | 17.81±0.88bc | 38.88±3.40cd |
W9N9 | 1.31±0.04cd | 20.78±0.20d | 0.57±0.02ab | 185.77±0.31g | 18.88±0.23ab | 36.28±1.66d |
处理 Treatments | 产量 Yield | 可溶性固形物 Soluble solid | 可滴定酸 Titratable acid | 还原糖 Reducing sugar | VC Vitamin C | 固酸比 Solid acid than | 硬度 Hardness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1N1 | -1.396 | -0.430 | -0.904 | -0.732 | -1.388 | 0.262 | -1.268 |
W2N2 | -0.894 | 0.567 | 0.303 | -0.073 | 0.596 | 0.099 | 0.520 |
W3N3 | -0.703 | -0.335 | 1.660 | -1.298 | 0.690 | -1.115 | -0.104 |
W4N4 | -0.495 | 0.630 | -0.452 | 1.201 | 0.034 | 0.569 | -0.672 |
W5N5 | 1.588 | 0.937 | -1.357 | 1.210 | 0.905 | 1.336 | 1.201 |
W6N6 | 1.138 | 0.618 | 0.000 | -0.406 | 1.067 | 0.304 | 0.946 |
W7N7 | -0.286 | 0.897 | -0.904 | 0.536 | -1.584 | 1.010 | -1.467 |
W8N8 | 0.703 | -0.823 | 0.601 | 0.859 | -0.762 | -0.773 | 1.060 |
W9N9 | 0.347 | -2.060 | 1.054 | -1.295 | 0.441 | -1.691 | -0.217 |
Tab.4 Standardized treatment of each quality in maturity stage
处理 Treatments | 产量 Yield | 可溶性固形物 Soluble solid | 可滴定酸 Titratable acid | 还原糖 Reducing sugar | VC Vitamin C | 固酸比 Solid acid than | 硬度 Hardness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1N1 | -1.396 | -0.430 | -0.904 | -0.732 | -1.388 | 0.262 | -1.268 |
W2N2 | -0.894 | 0.567 | 0.303 | -0.073 | 0.596 | 0.099 | 0.520 |
W3N3 | -0.703 | -0.335 | 1.660 | -1.298 | 0.690 | -1.115 | -0.104 |
W4N4 | -0.495 | 0.630 | -0.452 | 1.201 | 0.034 | 0.569 | -0.672 |
W5N5 | 1.588 | 0.937 | -1.357 | 1.210 | 0.905 | 1.336 | 1.201 |
W6N6 | 1.138 | 0.618 | 0.000 | -0.406 | 1.067 | 0.304 | 0.946 |
W7N7 | -0.286 | 0.897 | -0.904 | 0.536 | -1.584 | 1.010 | -1.467 |
W8N8 | 0.703 | -0.823 | 0.601 | 0.859 | -0.762 | -0.773 | 1.060 |
W9N9 | 0.347 | -2.060 | 1.054 | -1.295 | 0.441 | -1.691 | -0.217 |
解释的总方差Total variance of interpretation | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
成分 Ingredient | 初始特征值Initial eigenvalue | 提取载荷平方和Extract the sum of squares of loads | ||||
总计 Total | 方差百分比 Percentage of variance | 累积 Accumulate (%) | 总计 Total | 方差百分比 Percentage of variance | 累积 Accumulate (%) | |
1 | 3.266 | 46.655 | 46.655 | 3.266 | 46.655 | 46.655 |
2 | 2.317 | 33.097 | 79.751 | 2.317 | 33.097 | 79.751 |
3 | 0.739 | 10.560 | 90.312 | |||
4 | 0.380 | 5.430 | 95.742 | |||
5 | 0.153 | 2.188 | 97.929 | |||
6 | 0.145 | 2.066 | 99.995 | |||
7 | 0.000 | 0.005 | 100.000 |
Tab.5 Results of principle component analysis during maturity period
解释的总方差Total variance of interpretation | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
成分 Ingredient | 初始特征值Initial eigenvalue | 提取载荷平方和Extract the sum of squares of loads | ||||
总计 Total | 方差百分比 Percentage of variance | 累积 Accumulate (%) | 总计 Total | 方差百分比 Percentage of variance | 累积 Accumulate (%) | |
1 | 3.266 | 46.655 | 46.655 | 3.266 | 46.655 | 46.655 |
2 | 2.317 | 33.097 | 79.751 | 2.317 | 33.097 | 79.751 |
3 | 0.739 | 10.560 | 90.312 | |||
4 | 0.380 | 5.430 | 95.742 | |||
5 | 0.153 | 2.188 | 97.929 | |||
6 | 0.145 | 2.066 | 99.995 | |||
7 | 0.000 | 0.005 | 100.000 |
处理 Treatments | 成熟期Mature period | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Z1 | Z2 | Z | 排名 Ranking | |
W1N1 | 0.02 | -2.52 | -1.03 | 7 |
W2N2 | -0.05 | 0.21 | 0.06 | 5 |
W3N3 | -2.35 | 0.02 | -1.37 | 8 |
W4N4 | 1.31 | -0.58 | 0.53 | 3 |
W5N5 | 2.51 | 2.04 | 2.31 | 1 |
W6N6 | 0.30 | 1.74 | 0.90 | 2 |
W7N7 | 1.80 | -1.98 | 0.23 | 4 |
W8N8 | -0.53 | 0.80 | 0.02 | 6 |
W9N9 | -3.01 | 0.26 | -1.65 | 9 |
Tab.6 Comprehensive evaluation of different water and fertilizer treatments at maturity stage
处理 Treatments | 成熟期Mature period | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Z1 | Z2 | Z | 排名 Ranking | |
W1N1 | 0.02 | -2.52 | -1.03 | 7 |
W2N2 | -0.05 | 0.21 | 0.06 | 5 |
W3N3 | -2.35 | 0.02 | -1.37 | 8 |
W4N4 | 1.31 | -0.58 | 0.53 | 3 |
W5N5 | 2.51 | 2.04 | 2.31 | 1 |
W6N6 | 0.30 | 1.74 | 0.90 | 2 |
W7N7 | 1.80 | -1.98 | 0.23 | 4 |
W8N8 | -0.53 | 0.80 | 0.02 | 6 |
W9N9 | -3.01 | 0.26 | -1.65 | 9 |
[1] | 侯裕生, 王振华, 李文昊, 等. 极端干旱区滴灌葡萄水肥适宜用量主成分分析法[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2021, 39(1): 89-95. |
HOU Yusheng, WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao, et al. Principal component analysis of appropriate water and fertilizer dosage for grape under drip irrigation in extremely dry early area[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2021, 39(1):89-95. | |
[2] | 张兴国, 胡笑涛, 冉辉, 等. 水肥耦合对温室葡萄产量和水肥利用的影响[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2019,(1): 1-5. |
ZHANG Xinguo, HU Xiaotao, RAN Hui, et al. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on grape yield and water and fertilizer utilization in greenhouse[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2019,(1): 1-5. | |
[3] |
邢英英, 张富仓, 张燕, 等. 滴灌施肥水肥耦合对温室番茄产量、品质和水氮利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(4): 713-726.
DOI |
XING Yingying, ZHANG Fucang, ZHANG Yan, et al. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling under drip irrigation on yield, quality and water and hydrogen utilization of tomato in greenhouse[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(4): 713-726.
DOI |
|
[4] | 张江辉, 刘洪波, 白云岗, 等. 极端干旱区滴灌葡萄水肥耦合效应研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2018, 55(4): 804-814. |
ZHANG Jianghui, LIU Hongbo, BAI Yungang, et al. Coupling effect of water and fertilizer on grape under drip irrigation in extreme arid region[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2018, 55(4): 804-814. | |
[5] |
王淑芬, 裴冬, 贾金生, 等. 膜下滴灌棉花关键生育期不同灌水量、灌水次数对其生长、产量及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2005,(5): 76-80.
DOI |
WANG Shufen, PEI Dong, JIA Jinsheng, et al. Effects of different irrigation amount and times on growth, yield and water use efficiency of cotton under mulch drip irrigation at key growth stages[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2005,(5): 76-80. | |
[6] |
Simonetta F, Rosella M, Francesco G. The effect of nitrogenous fertilizer application on leaf traits in durum wheat in relation to grain yield and development[J]. Field Crop Research, 2009, 110(1): 69-75.
DOI URL |
[7] | 黎冰, 侍朋宝, 栾雪涛, 等. 硝铵态氮不同配比对葡萄新梢生长和叶片光合特性的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(2): 73-83. |
LI Bing, SHI Pengbao, RUAN Xuetao, et al. Effects of nitrate ratio on the growth of new shoots and photosynthetic characteristics of grape leaves[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Ed.), 2018, 46(2): 73-83. | |
[8] | 史星雲, 李强, 张军, 等. 滴灌条件下水肥耦合对酿酒葡萄生长发育及果实品质的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2019, 28(2): 225-236. |
SHI Xingyun, LI Qiang, ZHANG Jun, et al. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on growth and fruit quality of wine grape under drip irrigation[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2019, 28(2): 225-236. | |
[9] | 李岳容. 打顶与喷施乙烯利对不同源库类型花生生理特性和产量品质的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2020. |
LI Yuerong. Effects of topping and spraying ethephon on physiological characteristics, yield and quality of peanut from different source and sink types[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2020. | |
[10] | 曾辰. 极端干旱区成龄葡萄生长特征与水分高效利用[D]. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院(教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心), 2010. |
ZENG Chen. Growth characteristics and water efficient utilization of mature grape in extremely dry early region[D]. Beijing: Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2010. | |
[11] | 王全九, 王康, 苏李君, 等. 灌溉施氮和种植密度对棉花叶面积指数与产量的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2021, 52(12): 300-312. |
WANG Quanjiu, WANG Kang, SU Lijun, et al. Effects of hydrogen application and planting density on leaf area index and yield of cotton[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2021, 52(12): 300-312. | |
[12] | 魏永华, 何双红, 徐长明. 控制灌溉条件下水肥耦合对水稻叶面积指数及产量的影响[J]. 农业系统科学与综合研究, 2010, 26(4): 500-505. |
WEI Yonghua, HE Shuanghong, XU Changming. Effect of water and fertilizer coupling on leaf area index and yield of rice under controlled irrigation[J]. Journal of Agricultural Systems Science and Integrated Research, 2010, 26(4): 500-505. | |
[13] | 毋海梅, 闫浩芳, 张川, 等. 温室滴灌黄瓜产量和水分利用效率对水分胁迫的响应[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(9): 84-93. |
WU Haimei, YAN Haofang, ZHANG Chuan, et al. Response of cucumber yield and water use efficiency to water stress under drip irrigation in greenhouse[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(9): 84-93. | |
[14] | 张丽莹. 不同水肥处理对温室无土栽培水果黄瓜生长发育的影响及其生理机制的研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2011. |
ZHANG Liying. Effects of different water and fertilizer treatments on the growth and development of cucumber and its physiological mechanism in soilless fruit cultivation in greenhouse[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2011. | |
[15] | 王程翰. 大棚膜下滴灌水肥耦合对葡萄生长发育、产量和品质的影响[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2016. |
WANG Chenghan. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on grape growth and development, yield and quality under mulched drip irrigation in greenhouse[D]. Changchun: Jilin Agricultural University, 2016. | |
[16] | 龚萍, 刘洪光, 何新林. 水肥状况对幼龄葡萄光合特性的影响研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2015,(7): 10-15. |
GONG Ping, LIU Hongguang, HE Xinlin. Effects of water and fertilizer status on photosynthetic characteristics of young grape[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2015,(7): 10-15. | |
[17] |
LIU K, ZHANG T Q, TAN C S, et al. Responses of fruit yield and quality of processing tomato to drip-irrigation and fertilizers phosphorus and potassium[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2011, 103(5): 1339-1345.
DOI URL |
[18] | 王连君, 王程翰, 乔建磊, 等. 膜下滴灌水肥耦合对葡萄生长发育、产量和品质的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2016, 47(6): 113-119, 92. |
WANG Lianjun, WANG Chenghan, QIAO Jianlei, et al. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling under mulch drip irrigation on growth, yield and quality of grape[J]. Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2016, 47(6): 113-119, 92. | |
[19] | 杜清洁, 李建明, 潘铜华, 等. 滴灌条件下水肥耦合对番茄产量及综合品质的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2015, 33(3): 10-17. |
DU Qingjie, LI Jianming, PAN Tonghua, et al. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on yield and comprehensive quality of tomato under drip irrigation[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2015, 33(3): 10-17. | |
[20] | 虞娜, 张玉龙, 黄毅, 等. 温室滴灌施肥条件下水肥耦合对番茄产量影响的研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2003(3): 179-183. |
YU Na, ZHANG Yulong, HUANG Yi, et al. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on tomato yield under drip irrigation and fertilization in greenhouse[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2003(3): 179-183. | |
[21] | 马宗桓, 李彦彪, 赵津, 等. 不同肥料配比对荒漠区‘黑比诺’葡萄果实品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2022,(4): 1-7. |
MA Zonghuan, LI Yanbiao, ZHAO Jin, et al. Effects of Different fertilizer ratios on fruit quality of "Pinot Noir" grape in desert area[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2022,(4): 1-7. | |
[22] | 王振华, 陈潇洁, 吕德生, 等. 水肥耦合对加气滴灌加工番茄产量及品质的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(19): 66-75. |
WANG Zhenhua, CHEN Xiaojie, LYU Desheng, et al. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on yield and quality of tomato processed by aerated drip irrigation[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(19): 66-75. | |
[23] | 李超. 膜下滴灌条件下温室草莓生长环境试验研究[D]. 邯郸: 河北工程大学, 2018. |
LI Chao. Experimental study on strawberry growth environment in greenhouse under drip irrigation under membrane[D]. Handan: Hebei University of Engineering, 2018. |
[1] | JIN Juan, LI lili, YANG Lei, FAN Dingyu, HAO Qing. Analysis on the Development status of Xinjiang Jujube Industry [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 106-110. |
[2] | WU Yating, CHEN He, ZHENG Nan, MA Xianlan, ZHOU Lina, ZHAO Yankun. Current situation and development trend prospect of Xinjiang characteristic dairy industry [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 158-162. |
[3] | HOU Xianzheng, XIAO Tong, CHEN Yulan, WEI Jiyu. The spatial effects and mechanism of digital technology innovation on agricultural economic resilience [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 196-205. |
[4] | YUE Rongqiang, ZHANG Qiong, WANG Fang, DENG Wenwen, CHEN Yu, Maiwulanjiang Mamut, Nurmanquli Batur. Improve the academic quality and influence of agricultural academic journals [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 256-260. |
[5] | WANG Junduo, CUI Yujiang, LIANG Yajun, GONG Zhaolong, ZHENG Junyun, LI Xueyuan. Xinjiang cotton production advantageous regional layout scheme [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 60-69. |
[6] | FANG Hui, DING Yindeng, FAN Guiqiang, GAO Yonghong, HUANG Tianrong. Research report on the development status of wheat industry in southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 75-80. |
[7] | YANG Minghua, LIAO Biyong, LIU Qiang, PENG Yuncheng, Dawulai Jiekeshan, FENG Guorui, TANG Shimin. Study on variation of grain nutritional quality of glutinous maize [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2087-2093. |
[8] | ZHANG Zehua, YE Hanchun, WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao, LI Haiqiang, LIU Jian. Effects of equal nitrogen applied with urease inhibitor on cotton growth, yield, and quality under mulched drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111. |
[9] | CHEN Ruijie, LUO Linyi, RUAN Xiangyang, YE Jun. Effects of humic acid on soil nutrients, cotton yield and quality in cotton fields under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121. |
[10] | HUANG Boxuan, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, SHAO Jingjing, FENG Weina, PANG Chaoyou, XU Wenxiu, DONG Helin. Effects of different nitrogen inhibitors on growth, nitrogen utilization and yield of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131. |
[11] | ZENG Wanying, GENG Hongwei, CHENG Yukun, LI Sizhong, QIAN Songting, GAO Weishi, ZHANG Liming. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance during the rapid growth stage of sugar beet cultivars [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2140-2151. |
[12] | LIU Jing, DU Mingchuan, ZHANG Wenting, BAO Haijuan, JING Meiling, DU Wenhua. Screening of triticale germplasm in different areas of Qinghai [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2183-2190. |
[13] | TIAN Haiyan, ZHANG Zhanqin, XIE Jianhui, WANG Jianjiang, YANG Xiangkun. Study on the relationship between Lycopene and main quality characters of processing tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2197-2202. |
[14] | ZHANG Tingjun, LI Zihui, CUI Yujiang, SUN Xiaogui, CHEN Fang. Effects of microbial agents on cotton growth and soil physico-chemical properties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2269-2276. |
[15] | CHEN Fang, LI Zihui, SUNXiaogui , ZHANG Tingjun. Different dosage of microbial agents on the yield and quality of processed tomatoes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 32
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 378
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||