Effects of the Amount of Phosphate Fertilizer on Processing Tomato Yield and P Use Efficiency by Drip Irrigation

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.01.021

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 To study the effects of applying different amounts of phosphate fertilizer on the yield. 【Method】 Phosphorus utilization efficiency of tomato under drip irrigation using Jinfan 1606 processed tomato as a test variety through field experiments.Based on the same nitrogen and potassium (N 240 kg/hm², K₂O 90 kg/hm²), five treatments were set up in the test: (1) P₀: no phosphate fertilizer was applied; (2) P₆₀: phosphate fertilizer (P₂O₅) was used at 60 kg/hm^2; (3) P₁₂₀: phosphate fertilizer (P₂O₅) is 120 kg/hm²; (4) P₁₈₀: phosphate fertilizer (P₂O₅) is 180 kg/hm²; (5) P₂₄₀: phosphate fertilizer (P₂O₅) is 240 kg/hm². 【Result】 The results showed that compared with the treatment without phosphorus fertilizer, the application of phosphorus fertilizer significantly increased the phosphorus absorption of processed tomatoes, and the P absorption rate increased with the increase of phosphorus application, but the utilization efficiency of phosphate fertilizer decreased with the increase of phosphorus application.At the same time, the application of phosphate fertilizer significantly increased the yield of processed tomatoes, which increased 3.6%-7.4% compared with no phosphate fertilizer.When the amount of phosphate fertilizer was less than 120 kg/hm², the yield of processing tomatoes increased with the increase of phosphorus application; and when the amount was over than that, the yield no longer increased significantly.The application of phosphate fertilizer had no significant effect on the quality of processing tomatoes. 【Conclusion】 Under this experimental condition, the suitable phosphorus application rate was 129.7 kg/hm², and the optimal economic yield was 121 t/hm².

Key words: processing tomato; phosphate fertilizer; yield; quality; puse efficiency

摘要：

【目的】研究施用不同量磷肥对膜下滴灌加工番茄产量、品质及磷肥利用率的影响。【方法】以金番1606加工番茄为供试品种,通过田间试验,在相同氮钾(N 240 kg/hm²、K₂O 90 kg/hm²)的基础上,设5个处理:(1)P₀:不施磷肥;(2)P₆₀:磷肥(P₂O₅)用量为60 kg/hm²;(3)P₁₂₀:磷肥(P₂O₅)用量为120 kg/hm²;(4)P₁₈₀:磷肥(P₂O₅)用量为180 kg/hm²;(5)P₂₄₀:磷肥(P₂O₅)用量为240 kg/hm²。【结果】与不施磷肥处理相比,施用磷肥显著提高了加工番茄的磷素吸收量,且P吸收速率随施磷量的增加而增加,但磷肥的利用效率却随施磷量的增加而降低。施用磷肥显著增加了加工番茄产量,比不施磷肥增产3.6%~7.4%,当磷肥用量小于120 kg/hm²时,加工番茄产量随施磷量的增加而增加;当磷肥用量超过120 kg/hm²时,加工番茄的产量不再显著增加。而施用磷肥对加工番茄品质没有显著影响。【结论】最佳经济施磷量为129.7 kg/hm²,最佳经济产量为121 t/hm²。

关键词: 加工番茄, 磷肥, 产量, 品质, 磷肥利用率

CLC Number:

S641.2

LU Dawei, Halihashi Yibat, LI Qingjun. Effects of the Amount of Phosphate Fertilizer on Processing Tomato Yield and P Use Efficiency by Drip Irrigation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(1): 185-191.

芦大伟, 哈丽哈什·依巴提, 李青军. 磷肥用量对滴灌加工番茄产量、品质及磷肥利用率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 185-191.

Figures/Tables 6

References 24

[1]	汤明尧, 张炎, 胡伟, 等. 施氮对加工番茄养分吸收、分配及产量品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2009,(3):26-30.
	TANG Mingyao, ZHANG Yan, HU Wei, et al. Effects of nitrogen application on nutrient absorption, distribution, yield and quality of processed tomato[J]. Soils and Fertilizers in China, 2009,(3):26-30.
[2]	赵方华, 姜波. 加工番茄精准施肥决策支持系统的研究[J]. 农机化研究, 2016,(4):11-16.
	ZHAO Fanghua, JIANG Bo. Research on the Decision Support System for Precise Fertilization of Processing Tomatoes[J]. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2016,(4): 11-16.
[3]	赖波, 汤明尧, 柴仲平, 等. 新疆农田化肥施用现状调查与评价[J]. 干旱区研究, 2014, 31(6): 1024-1030.
	LAI Bo, TANG Mingyao, CHAI Zhongping, et al. Investigation and evaluation of current status of chemical fertilizer application in Xinjiang[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2014, 31(6): 1024-1030.
[4]	Castro B, Torrent J. Phosphate availability in calcareous Vertisols and Inceptisols in relation to fertilizer type and soil properties[J]. Fertilizer Research, 1994, 40(2):109-119. DOI URL
[5]	Delgado A, Madrid A, Kassem S, et al. Phosphorus fertilizer recovery from calcareous soils amended with humic and fulvic acids[J]. Plant & Soil, 2002, 245(2):277-286.
[6]	张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 等. 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径[J]. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(5):915-924.
	ZHANG Fusuo, WANG Jiqing, ZHANG Weifeng, et al. Current status of fertilizer utilization rate of main grain crops in China and ways to improve[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2008, 45(5):915-924.
[7]	林诚, 王飞, 李清华, 等. 长期不同施肥下南方黄泥田有效磷对磷盈亏的响应特征[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(5):1175-1183.
	LIN Cheng, WANG Fei, LI Qinghua, et al. Response characteristics of available phosphorus to phosphorus gains and losses in southern yellow mud fields under long-term different fertilization[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2017, 23(5): 1175-1183.
[8]	鲁艳红, 廖育林, 聂军, 等. 长期施肥红壤性水稻土磷素演变特征及对磷盈亏的响应[J]. 土壤学报, 2017, 54(6):1471-1485.
	LU Yanhong, LIAO Yulin, NIE Jun, et al. Long-term fertilization of red paddy soil phosphorus evolution characteristics and its response to phosphorus deficit[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2017, 54(6): 1471-1485.
[9]	阳文治, 余存祖. 黄土高原区域治理与评价[M]. 北京: 科学出版社,1992.
	YANG Wenzhi, YU Cunzu. Regional Management and Evaluation of the Loess Plateau[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1992.
[10]	胡国智, 张炎, 胡伟, 等. 施磷对棉花磷素吸收利用和产量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2010,(4):27-31.
	HU Guozhi, ZHANG Yan, HU Wei, et al. Effects of phosphorus application on cotton phosphorus absorption and utilization and yield[J]. China Soil and Fertilizer, 2010,(4): 27-31.
[11]	国世佳, 段玉, 张君, 等. 不同类型尿素配施对加工番茄产量、品质及氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2018, 20(6): 96-103. DOI
	GUO Shijia, DUAN Yu, ZHANG Jun, et al. Effects of combined application of different types of urea on the yield, quality and nitrogen utilization efficiency of processing tomatoes[J]. Review of China Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(6): 96- 103.
[12]	张炎, 马海刚, 徐万里, 等. 施钾对加工番茄产量与品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2008,(3):40-42.
	ZHANG Yan, MA Haigang, XU Wanli, et al. The effect of potassium application on the yield and quality of processed tomatoes[J]. China Soil and Fertilizer, 2008,(3): 40-42.
[13]	哈丽哈什·依巴提, 张炎, 李青军. 新型尿素对加工番茄的产量和氮素利用率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(2):278-287. DOI
	Halihas Ibati, ZHANG Yan, LI Qingjun. The effect of new urea on the yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency of processed tomatoes[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(2): 278-287.
[14]	汤明尧, 张炎, 胡伟, 等. 加工番茄氮肥用量与氮营养状况诊断研究[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2015, (4): 82-87.
	TANG Mingyao, ZHANG Yan, HU Wei, et al. Diagnosis of Nitrogen Fertilizer Dosage and Nitrogen Nutrition Status of Processing Tomato[J]. Soils and Fertilizers Sciences in China, 2015(4): 82-87.
[15]	杨玉珍, 孟超然, 张新疆, 等. 氮、钾肥用量对膜下滴灌加工番茄产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017,(1): 61-67.
	YANG Yuzhen, MENG Chaoran, ZHANG Xinjiang, et al. Effects of nitrogen and potassium fertilizer rates on the yield and quality of tomato processed by drip irrigation under mulch[J]. Soils and Fertilizers Sciences in China, 2017,(1): 61-67.
[16]	马乔玲, 张炎, 李青军, 等. 钾肥施用对加工番茄产量及效益的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2013, 50(11):2046-2053.
	MA Qiaoling, ZHANG Yan, LI Qingjun, et al. Effect of Potassium Fertilizer Application on the Yield and Benefit of Processing Tomato[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 50(11): 2046-2053.
[17]	姜宗庆, 封超年, 黄联联, 等. 施磷量对小麦物质生产及吸磷特性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006, 12(5):628-634.
	JIANG Zongqing, FENG Chaonian, HUANG Lianlian, et al. Effects of phosphorus application amount on wheat material production and phosphorus absorption characteristics[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2006, 12(5): 628-634.
[18]	边秀芝, 盖嘉慧, 郭金瑞, 等. 玉米施磷肥的生物效应[J]. 玉米科学, 2008, 16(5):120-122.
	BIAN Xiuzhi, GAI Jiahui, GUO Jinrui, et al. Biological Effects of Phosphorus Fertilizer Application on Maize[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2008, 16(5): 120-122.
[19]	岳红丽, 张胜, 蒙美莲, 等. 施磷量对膜下滴灌马铃薯产质量及磷肥利用效率的影响[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报, 2013, 34(3): 40-45.
	YUE Hongli, ZHANG Sheng, MENG Meilian, et al. Effect of Phosphorus Application on Potato Yield and Quality and Phosphate Fertilizer Utilization Efficiency under Mulch Drip Irrigation[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2013, 34(3): 40-45.
[20]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析(3版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
	BAO Shidan. Soil agrochemical analysis (3rd ed.)[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2000.
[21]	汤明尧, 张炎, 胡伟, 等. 施肥对加工番茄生长发育和养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2009,(3):26-30.
	TANG Mingyao, ZHANG Yan, HU Wei, et al. The effect of fertilization on the growth and development and nutrient absorption and utilization of processing tomatoes[J]. Soils and Fertilizers Sciences in China, 2009,(3): 26-30.
[22]	沙海宁, 孙权, 李建设, 等. 不同施磷量对设施番茄生长、产量的影响及最佳施用量研究[J]. 长江蔬菜(学术版), 2010, (20): 59-62.
	SHA Haining, SUN Quan, LI Jianshe, et al. The effect of different phosphorus application rates on the growth and yield of protected tomato and the optimal application rate[J]. Yangtze River Vegetables (Academic Ed.), 2010,(20): 59- 62.
[23]	张炎, 王讲利, 刘骅. 新疆棉田土壤养分的吸附特征与有效性研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2005, 10(5):47-51.
	ZHANG Yan, WANG Jiangli, LIU Hua. Study on adsorption characteristics and availability of soil nutrients in Xinjiang cotton field[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2005, 10(5):47-51.
[24]	王平, 陈新平, 田长彦, 等. 新疆南部地区棉花施肥现状及评价[J]. 干旱区研究, 2005, 6(2):264-268.
	WANG Ping, CHEN Xinping, TIAN Changyan, et al. Actuality and Evaluation of Fertilization in Cotton Fields in South Xinjiang[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2005, 6(2):264-268.

年份 Year	处理 Treatment	P利用率 P use efficiency(%)	农学效率 Agronomy efficiency(kg/kg)	偏生产力 Partial productivity(kg/kg)
2017	P₀	/	/	/
	P₆₀	32.8^a	54.4^a	1 964^a
	P₁₂₀	28.1^a	59.4^a	1 014^b
	P₁₈₀	20.0^b	40.2^b	677^c
	P₂₄₀	16.0^c	29.0^c	507^d
2018	P₀	/	/	/
	P₆₀	37.8^a	80.7^a	1 965^a
	P₁₂₀	29.8^b	81.5^a	1 024^b
	P₁₈₀	21.4^c	51.6^b	680^c
	P₂₄₀	17.1^d	39.7^c	511^d
平均 Average	P₀	/	/	/
	P₆₀	35.3^a	67.5^a	1 965^a
	P₁₂₀	28.9^b	70.5^a	1 019^b
	P₁₈₀	20.7^c	45.9^b	678^c
	P₂₄₀	16.5^d	34.4^c	509^d

年份 Year	处理 Treatment	P利用率 P use efficiency(%)	农学效率 Agronomy efficiency(kg/kg)	偏生产力 Partial productivity(kg/kg)
2017	P₀	/	/	/
	P₆₀	32.8^a	54.4^a	1 964^a
	P₁₂₀	28.1^a	59.4^a	1 014^b
	P₁₈₀	20.0^b	40.2^b	677^c
	P₂₄₀	16.0^c	29.0^c	507^d
2018	P₀	/	/	/
	P₆₀	37.8^a	80.7^a	1 965^a
	P₁₂₀	29.8^b	81.5^a	1 024^b
	P₁₈₀	21.4^c	51.6^b	680^c
	P₂₄₀	17.1^d	39.7^c	511^d
平均 Average	P₀	/	/	/
	P₆₀	35.3^a	67.5^a	1 965^a
	P₁₂₀	28.9^b	70.5^a	1 019^b
	P₁₈₀	20.7^c	45.9^b	678^c
	P₂₄₀	16.5^d	34.4^c	509^d

年份 Year	处理 Treatment	可溶性固形物 Soluble solid (%)	pH	色差 Color difference	总酸 The total of acidity (%)	茄红素 Lycopene (mg/100g)
	P₀	5.17	4.43	2.45	0.47	10.73
	P₆₀	4.86	4.47	2.53	0.44	11.80
2017	P₁₂₀	5.24	4.66	2.48	0.46	11.19
	P₁₈₀	5.04	4.54	2.52	0.44	10.62
	P₂₄₀	5.12	4.48	2.44	0.45	11.37
	显著性Significance	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
	P₀	5.01	4.33	2.57	0.48	10.86
	P₆₀	4.98	4.45	2.43	0.47	11.36
2018	P₁₂₀	5.17	4.36	2.49	0.44	11.24
	P₁₈₀	5.12	4.39	2.52	0.43	11.18
	P₂₄₀	5.09	4.47	2.51	0.46	10.67
	显著性Significance	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns

年份 Year	处理 Treatment	可溶性固形物 Soluble solid (%)	pH	色差 Color difference	总酸 The total of acidity (%)	茄红素 Lycopene (mg/100g)
	P₀	5.17	4.43	2.45	0.47	10.73
	P₆₀	4.86	4.47	2.53	0.44	11.80
2017	P₁₂₀	5.24	4.66	2.48	0.46	11.19
	P₁₈₀	5.04	4.54	2.52	0.44	10.62
	P₂₄₀	5.12	4.48	2.44	0.45	11.37
	显著性Significance	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
	P₀	5.01	4.33	2.57	0.48	10.86
	P₆₀	4.98	4.45	2.43	0.47	11.36
2018	P₁₂₀	5.17	4.36	2.49	0.44	11.24
	P₁₈₀	5.12	4.39	2.52	0.43	11.18
	P₂₄₀	5.09	4.47	2.51	0.46	10.67
	显著性Significance	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns