Effects of Different Planting Densities on Main Agronomic Traits and Yield of Peanuts

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.11.005

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 To study the effects of different density treatments on agronomic traits and yields of Huayu 25, 33 and 36 series peanut varieties and find out the best configuration of density and yield to promote. 【Methods】 The experiments were carried out to treat 4 planting density levels (1.2×10⁵ holes/hm², 1.5×10⁵ holes/hm², 1.8×10⁵ holes/hm², 2.1×10⁵ holes/hm²) by using split plot design, through the analysis of 3 Huayu series peanut varieties (Huayu 25, 33 and 36). The effects of density on the main agronomic traits, such as main stem height and lateral branch length and yield of each peanut variety under different planting densities were studied in order to select the best planting density. 【Results】 The main stem height in the density range of 1.2×10⁵~1.5×10⁵ holes/hm² was significantly higher than the density of 1.8×10⁵~2.1×10⁵ holes/hm²; The lateral branches length in the density treatment of 1.5×10⁵ holes/hm² was significantly higher than other treatments by 1~6.8 cm; The number of pods per plant and well filled pods were the largest under low density, decreasing with the increase of density; Planting density had no significant difference in the effect of total branches and effective branches; Huayu 33 had the highest yield when the planting density was 1.5×10⁵ holes/hm² which was 4,555.58 kg/hm², followed by Huayu 36, whose density was 1.8×10⁵ holes/hm², and the third was Huayu 25, whose density was 1.5×10⁵ holes/hm² treatment. 【Conclusion】 The planting density of Huayu series peanut varieties is 1.5×10⁵~1.8×10⁵ holes/hm², which can promote the high yield of peanuts in Bazhou area of Xinjiang.

Key words: peanut; planting density; agronomic traits; yield

摘要：

【目的】研究不同密度处理下对花生农艺性状及产量的影响,分析密度与产量的最佳配置。【方法】选取3种花育系列花生品种(花育25号、花育33号和花育36号),设置4个种植密度水平(1.2×10⁵、1.5×10⁵、1.8×10⁵和2.1×10⁵穴/hm²)处理进行列区设计试验,测定不同种植密度下各花生品种的主茎高、侧枝长等主要农艺性状以及产量,筛选最佳种植密度。【结果】密度为1.2×10⁵~1.5×10⁵穴/hm²主茎高要显著大于密度为1.8×10⁵~2.1×10⁵穴/hm²;密度处理为1.5×10⁵穴/hm²的侧枝长比其他处理显著高出1~6.8 cm;单株果数和饱果数均在低密度下最大,随密度的增大而减小;种植密度对总分枝和结果枝影响差异不显著;花育33号在种植密度为1.5×10⁵穴/hm²时产量为最大,为4 555.58 kg/hm²,其次是花育36号、密度为1.8×10⁵穴/hm²处理,第三是花育25号、密度为1.5×10⁵穴/hm²处理。【结论】花育系列花生品种种植密度为1.5×10⁵~1.8×10⁵穴/hm²。

关键词: 花生, 种植密度, 农艺性状, 产量

CLC Number:

S565.2

DU Shanshan, CHEN Jinrui, LUO Jing, YAO Qingqing, SUN Huijian, HE Zhongsheng, Kurban Yasheng. Effects of Different Planting Densities on Main Agronomic Traits and Yield of Peanuts[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(11): 2637-2643.

杜珊珊, 陈晋瑞, 罗静, 姚青青, 孙绘健, 何忠盛, 库尔班・牙生. 不同种植密度对花生主要性状及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(11): 2637-2643.

Figures/Tables 6

References 24

[1]	Kumar R, Pandey M K, Roychoudhry S, et al. Peg biology: Deciphering the Molecular Regulations Involved during Peanut Peg Development[J]. Front Plant Science, 2019, (10): 1289.
[2]	李楠, 杨秀丽, 宁东贤, 等. 花生抗旱性鉴定指标及评价研究进展[J]. 农业科学, 2020, 40(11): 11-14.
	LI Nan, YANG Xiuli, NING Dongxian, et al. Research Progress on Identification Index and Evaluation of Peanut Drought Resistance[J]. Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 40(11): 11-14.
[3]	高飞, 翟志席, 王铭伦. 密度对夏直播花生光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(11): 320-323.
	GAO Fei, ZHAI Zhixi, WANG Minglun. Effects of Plant Density on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield in Summer-planting Peanut[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(11): 320-323.
[4]	裴瑞杰, 方丽, 孙天洲, 等. 花生单双粒播种及适宜密度研究[J]. 信阳农林学院学报, 2020, 30(1): 89-91, 96.
	PEI Ruijie, FANG Li, SUN Tianzhou, et al. Study on Single and Double Grain Sowing and Suitable Density of Peanut[J]. Journal of Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, 2020, 30(1): 89-91, 96.
[5]	陈四龙, 李玉荣, 程增书, 等. 用GGE 双标图分析种植密度对高油花生生长和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(7): 1328-1335.
	CHEN Silong, LI Yurong, CHENG Zengshu, et al. GGE Biplot Analysis of Effects of Planting Density on Growth and Yield Components of High Oil Peanut[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2009, 35(7): 1328-1335. DOI URL
[6]	蒋春姬, 梁烜赫, 曹铁华, 等. 密植条件下高产花生品种的群体结构及生长特性比较[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2010, 32(3): 237-241.
	JIANG Chunji, LIANG Xuanhe, CAO Tiehua, et al. Comparison of Population Structure and Growth Characters of High-Yield Peanuts under Dense Planting[J]. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 2010, 32(3): 237-241.
[7]	吴鑫桃. 不同品种、密度、施氮量对红衣花生产量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2005, 33(4): 575.
	WU Xintao. Effects of Different Varieties, Density and Nitrogen Application Rate on the Yield of Peanut in Red Coat[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Science. 2005, 33(4): 575.
[8]	Maas A L, Dashiell K E, Melouk H A. Planting densityinfluences disease incidence and severity of sclerotinia blight in peanut[J]. Crop Science, 2006, 46(3): 1341-1345. DOI URL
[9]	栾天浩, 翟季, 孙袆龙, 等. 密度与氮、磷、钾用量对花生吉花1号产量的影响[J]. 东北农业科学, 2017, 42(4): 23-26.
	LUAN Tianhao, ZHAI Ji, SUN Weilong, et al. Effects of Density and Amount of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium on the Yield of Peanut Jihua No.1[J]. Northeast Agricultural Science, 2017, 42(4): 23-26.
[10]	李强, 顾元国, 王娟, 等. 新疆旱区不同种植密度对花生光合生理及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2016, 53(1): 84-90.
	LI Qiang, GU Yuanguo, SUN Weilong, et al. Effects of Different Density on Photosynthetic Physiology and Yield of Peanut in Arid Regions of Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 53(1): 84-90.
[11]	吴继华, 张金民, 肖召杰, 等. 不同播期和密度对珍珠豆型花生品种远杂9307经济性状和产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(9): 151-153.
	WU Jihua, ZHANG Jinmin, XIAO Zhaojie, et al. Effect of Different Planting Period and Density[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2005, 21(9): 151-153.
[12]	陈雷, 范小玉, 李可, 等. 不同播期和密度对花生新品种商研9807 主要经济性状和产量的影响[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2014, (4): 118-121.
	CHEN Lei, FAN Xiaoyu, LI Ke, et al. Effect of Different Sowing Date and Density on Main Economic Characters and Yield of New Peanut Variety Shangyan 9807[J]. Agricultural Science and Technology Newsletter, 2014,(4): 118-121.
[13]	刘俊华, 吴正峰, 李林, 等. 单粒精播密度对花生冠层结构及产量的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2020, 42(6): 970-977.
	LIU Junhua, WU Zhengfeng, LI Lin, et al. Effect of Different Density on Canopy Structure and Pod Yield of Peanut under Single Seed Precision Sowing[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2020, 42(6): 970-977.
[14]	张利民, 康涛, 李文金, 等. 播期和种植密度对夏直播花生生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 花生学报, 2017, 46(3):72-76.
	ZHANG Limin, KANG Tao, LI Wenjin, et al. Effects of Sowing Date and Density on Growth and Yield of Summer-planting Peanut[J]. Journal of Peanut Science, 2017, 46(3): 72-76.
[15]	高建玲, 杜绍印, 马秀娟, 等. 花生高产栽培适宜种植密度初探[J]. 耕作与科学, 2012, (1): 33-38.
	GAO Jianling, DU Shaoyin, MA XiuJuan, et al. Preliminary Study on Suitable Planting Density of Peanut High-yield Cultivation[J]. Farming and Science, 2012,(1): 33-38.
[16]	臧秀旺, 汤丰收, 张俊, 等. 起垄种植不同密度对花生产量及品质的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2015, 44(12): 42-44.
	ZANG Xiuwang, TANG Fengshou, HANG Jun, et al. Effect of Ridge Tillage Planting Density on the Yield and Quality of Peanut[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 44(12): 42-44.
[17]	李松坚, 王军强, 朱瑞华, 等. 不同种植密度对中间型大花生花育22号生物学性状与产量的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2014, 46(6): 64-66.
	LI Songjian, Wang Junqiang, Zhu Ruihua, et al. Effects of Different Planting Densities on Biological Characters and Yield of Intermediat-Type Peanut Variety Huayu 22[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 46(6): 64-66.
[18]	吴亚平. 种植密度对花育30号生长发育的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2011, (4): 42-43.
	WU Yaping. Effect of Planting Density on the Growth and Development of Huayu 30[J]. Journal of Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2011,(4): 42-43.
[19]	王亮, 王桥江, 李艳, 等. 天山北坡经济带机收花生膜下滴灌高产栽培技术[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2015, (6): 238-240.
	WANG Liang, WANG Qiaojiang, LI Yan, et al. High-yield Cultivation Techniques of Machine-harvested Peanuts under Plastic Film on the North Slope of Tangshan[J]. Agricultural Science and Technology Newsletter, 2015,(6): 238-240.
[20]	王亮, 李艳, 王桥江, 等. 膜下滴灌种植密度对花生主要农艺性状和产量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2017, 56(1): 21-25.
	WANG Liang, LI Yan, WANG Qiaojiang, et al. Effects of Different Planting Density on Main Agronomic Traits and Yield of Peanut under Mulched Drip Irrigation[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 56(1): 21-25.
[21]	张智猛, 戴良香, 慈敦伟, 等. 种植密度和播种方式对盐碱地花生生长发育、产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24(10): 1328-1338.
	ZHANG Zhimeng, DAI Liangxiang, CI Dunwei, et al. Effects of planting density and sowing method on growth, development, yield and quality of peanut in saline alkali land[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2016, 24(10): 1328-1338.
[22]	赵长星, 邵长亮, 王月福, 等. 单粒精播模式下种植密度对花生群体生态特征及产量的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2013, 3(2):1-5
	ZHAO Changxing, SHAO Changliang, WANG Yuefu, et al. Effects of different planting densities on population ecological characteristics and yield of peanut under the mode of single-seed precision sowing[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2013, 3(2): 1-5.
[23]	万书波. 花生优质安全增效栽培理论与技术[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2009.
	WAN Shubo. The Cultivation Theory and Technology of High Quality, Safety and Efficiency of Peanut[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2009.
[24]	修俊杰. 不同密度单粒精播对花生农艺性状光合特性及荚果产量的影响[J]. 农业与技术, 2018, 38(9): 4-7.
	XIU Junjie. Effects of single seed seeding at different densities on peanut agronomic trait photosynthetic characteristics and its pod yield.[J]. Agriculture & Technology, 2018, 38(9): 4-7.

代码 Code	项目 Items		处理组合 Treatment combination
A₁	花育25号	A₁B₁	花育25号,密度为1.2×10⁵穴/hm²
A₂	花育33号	A₁B₂	花育25号,密度为1.5×10⁵穴/hm²
A₃	花育36号	A₁B₃	花育25号,密度为1.8×10⁵穴/hm²
B₁	1.2×10⁵穴/hm²	A₁B₄	花育25号,密度为2.1×10⁵穴/hm²
B₁	1.2×10⁵穴/hm²	A₂B₁	花育33号,密度为1.2×10⁵穴/hm²
B₂	1.5×10⁵穴/hm²	A₂B₂	花育33号,密度为1.5×10⁵穴/hm²
B₂	1.5×10⁵穴/hm²	A₂B₃	花育33号,密度为1.8×10⁵穴/hm²
B₃	1.8×10⁵穴/hm²	A₂B₄	花育33号,密度为2.1×10⁵穴/hm²
B₃	1.8×10⁵穴/hm²	A₃B₁	花育36号,密度为1.2×10⁵穴/hm²
B₄	2.1×10⁵穴/hm²	A₃B₂	花育36号,密度为1.5×10⁵穴/hm²
		A₃B₃	花育36号,密度为1.8×10⁵穴/hm²
		A₃B₄	花育36号,密度为2.1×10⁵穴/hm²

代码 Code	项目 Items		处理组合 Treatment combination
A₁	花育25号	A₁B₁	花育25号,密度为1.2×10⁵穴/hm²
A₂	花育33号	A₁B₂	花育25号,密度为1.5×10⁵穴/hm²
A₃	花育36号	A₁B₃	花育25号,密度为1.8×10⁵穴/hm²
B₁	1.2×10⁵穴/hm²	A₁B₄	花育25号,密度为2.1×10⁵穴/hm²
B₁	1.2×10⁵穴/hm²	A₂B₁	花育33号,密度为1.2×10⁵穴/hm²
B₂	1.5×10⁵穴/hm²	A₂B₂	花育33号,密度为1.5×10⁵穴/hm²
B₂	1.5×10⁵穴/hm²	A₂B₃	花育33号,密度为1.8×10⁵穴/hm²
B₃	1.8×10⁵穴/hm²	A₂B₄	花育33号,密度为2.1×10⁵穴/hm²
B₃	1.8×10⁵穴/hm²	A₃B₁	花育36号,密度为1.2×10⁵穴/hm²
B₄	2.1×10⁵穴/hm²	A₃B₂	花育36号,密度为1.5×10⁵穴/hm²
		A₃B₃	花育36号,密度为1.8×10⁵穴/hm²
		A₃B₄	花育36号,密度为2.1×10⁵穴/hm²

处理组合 Treatment combination	主茎高 Main stem height (cm)	侧枝长 Lateral branches length (cm)	总分枝数 No.of branches (条)	结果枝数 No. of effective branches(条)	单株果数 No. of pods per plant (个)	饱果数 No. of plump- pod (个)
A₁B₁	18.50±0.50^e	22.80±0.84^h	8.00±0.71^a	7.60±0.55^a	30.40±11.33^ab	22.40±11.74^ab
A₁B₂	19.30±0.57^e	24.30±0.57^g	5.80±0.45^b	4.80±2.05^bc	24.00±6.12^abc	13.80±5.40^c
A₁B₃	16.60±0.65^f	22.30±0.45^h	4.80±0.45^cd	3.60±0.45^c	20.00±7.35^c	12.80±5.17^c
A₁B₄	17.10±0.55^f	23.10±0.76^h	5.40±0.55^bc	5.80±0.84^b	18.80±5.17^c	14.00±4.53^c
A₂B₁	29.20±0.76^a	36.80±0.57^b	5.20±0.84^bc	4.80±0.84^bc	33.20±3.27^a	24.20±2.28^a
A₂B₂	28.88±0.48^a	37.80±0.57^a	4.80±0.45^cd	4.00±0.00^c	17.40±9.99^bc	13.00±2.16^c
A₂B₃	28.70±0.84^a	36.40±0.42^b	4.80±0.45^cd	4.40±0.55^c	22.60±6.54^bc	17.60±5.13^abc
A₂B₄	24.60±0.89^c	31.00±0.94^cd	4.80±0.45^cd	3.80±0.84^c	17.80±3.19^c	12.20±2.17^c
A₃B₁	25.10±0.74^bc	29.40±0.65^e	5.00±1.00^bcd	4.40±0.55^c	26.40±11.59^abc	15.80±6.06^c
A₃B₂	25.90±0.96^b	31.80±0.57^c	4.20±0.45^d	4.20±0.45^c	20.40±4.51^c	14.40±3.05^c
A₃B₃	24.10±1.64^c	30.30±0.84^d	4.60±0.55^cd	4.00±0.71^c	19.20±6.98^c	12.40±3.78^c
A₃B₄	21.20±0.84^d	27.20±1.35^f	4.60±0.55^cd	4.80±0.45^bc	17.00±4.36^c	11.80±3.63^c

处理组合 Treatment combination	主茎高 Main stem height (cm)	侧枝长 Lateral branches length (cm)	总分枝数 No.of branches (条)	结果枝数 No. of effective branches(条)	单株果数 No. of pods per plant (个)	饱果数 No. of plump- pod (个)
A₁B₁	18.50±0.50^e	22.80±0.84^h	8.00±0.71^a	7.60±0.55^a	30.40±11.33^ab	22.40±11.74^ab
A₁B₂	19.30±0.57^e	24.30±0.57^g	5.80±0.45^b	4.80±2.05^bc	24.00±6.12^abc	13.80±5.40^c
A₁B₃	16.60±0.65^f	22.30±0.45^h	4.80±0.45^cd	3.60±0.45^c	20.00±7.35^c	12.80±5.17^c
A₁B₄	17.10±0.55^f	23.10±0.76^h	5.40±0.55^bc	5.80±0.84^b	18.80±5.17^c	14.00±4.53^c
A₂B₁	29.20±0.76^a	36.80±0.57^b	5.20±0.84^bc	4.80±0.84^bc	33.20±3.27^a	24.20±2.28^a
A₂B₂	28.88±0.48^a	37.80±0.57^a	4.80±0.45^cd	4.00±0.00^c	17.40±9.99^bc	13.00±2.16^c
A₂B₃	28.70±0.84^a	36.40±0.42^b	4.80±0.45^cd	4.40±0.55^c	22.60±6.54^bc	17.60±5.13^abc
A₂B₄	24.60±0.89^c	31.00±0.94^cd	4.80±0.45^cd	3.80±0.84^c	17.80±3.19^c	12.20±2.17^c
A₃B₁	25.10±0.74^bc	29.40±0.65^e	5.00±1.00^bcd	4.40±0.55^c	26.40±11.59^abc	15.80±6.06^c
A₃B₂	25.90±0.96^b	31.80±0.57^c	4.20±0.45^d	4.20±0.45^c	20.40±4.51^c	14.40±3.05^c
A₃B₃	24.10±1.64^c	30.30±0.84^d	4.60±0.55^cd	4.00±0.71^c	19.20±6.98^c	12.40±3.78^c
A₃B₄	21.20±0.84^d	27.20±1.35^f	4.60±0.55^cd	4.80±0.45^bc	17.00±4.36^c	11.80±3.63^c

处理组合 Treatment combination	荚果产量 Pod yield (kg/hm²)	标准差 Standard deviation	差异显著性 (P<0.05) Significance of different	位次 Rank
A₁B₁	3 022.24	116.89	g	12
A₁B₂	4 422.24	157.47	ab	3
A₁B₃	4 200.02	202.46	cd	7
A₁B₄	3 533.35	57.74	f	11
A₂B₁	3 566.68	100.00	f	10
A₂B₂	4 555.58	107.22	a	1
A₂B₃	4 233.35	33.50	bcd	6
A₂B₄	4 044.46	38.68	de	8
A₃B₁	3 933.35	66.50	e	9
A₃B₂	4 377.80	95.84	abc	4
A₃B₃	4 466.69	202.79	a	2
A₃B₄	4 350.02	50.00	abc	5