Effects of Branch Angle on the Dwarf Interstock Zhongai 1 Photosynthetic Fluorescence Parameters of Korla Fragrant Pear

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.11.006

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 To study the effects of different branching angles on the photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of Korla fragrant pear on the dwarf interstock of Zhongai 1 in the hope of providing a theoretical basis for establishing the most suitable branching angle for the shaping and cultivation of Korla fragrant pear young trees with dwarf stock and dense planting. 【Methods】 The 5-year-old Korla fragrant pear with Du pear was used as the base stock and Zhongai 1 as the intermediate rootstock was used as the experimental material. The differences in photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of Korla fragrant pear under different branching angles were determined and analyzed. 【Results】 The results showed that the diurnal variation curves of P_n of Korla fragrant pear treated with different branching angles showed a "double peak" type, and there was an obvious photosynthetic lunch break. With the increase of the branching angle, the photosynthetic parameters of Korla fragrant pear also increased, but when the branching angle was too large, exceeding 80°, the photosynthesis of the tree was inhibited. Under 80° branching treatment, the daily average values of photosynthetic parameters P_n, G_s, C_i, T_r and E_wu of Korla fragrant pear were higher than those of other three treatments, and the daily mean values of P_n, C_i and T_r were significantly different from other treatments. Φ_PSII, C_qp, C_NPQ and R_ET had the highest daily average. 【Conclusion】 Compared with other branch-pulling treatments, the photosynthesis of Korla fragrant pear is the strongest at 80° branch-pulling angle, and the light inhibition is weak. Therefore, 80° branch-pulling angle can be used as the dwarf interstock of Korla fragrant pear Zhongai 1.

Key words: Korla fragrant pear; branch angle; dwarf rootstock; photosynthetic characteristic; chlorophyll fluorescence

摘要：

【目的】研究不同拉枝角度对中矮1号矮化中间砧库尔勒香梨光合及叶绿素荧光特性的影响,为矮砧密植库尔勒香梨幼树整形栽培最适宜的拉枝角度提供理论依据。【方法】以杜梨为基砧,中矮1号为中间砧木的5年生库尔勒香梨为材料,采用不同拉枝角度(40°、60°、80°、100°)4个处理,测定并分析不同拉枝角度下库尔勒香梨的光合特性和叶绿素荧光特性差异。【结果】不同拉枝角度处理下中矮1号矮化中间砧库尔勒香梨的净光合速率(P_n)日变化曲线均呈“双峰”型,存在明显的光合午休现象。随着拉枝角度的增大,库尔勒香梨的光合参数也随着增大,但当拉枝角度过大,超过80°时,树体光合作用则会受到抑制。在80°拉枝处理下,库尔勒香梨的光合参数P_n、气孔导度(G_s)、细胞间隙CO₂浓度(C_i)和蒸腾速率(T_r)日均值均高于其他3个处理,P_n日均值最高可达10.04 μmol/(m²·s),P_n、C_i和T_r日均值与其他处理存在显著性差异,实际光化学效率(Φ_PSⅡ)、光化学淬灭系数(C_qp)、非光学淬灭系数(C_NPQ)和PSII电子传递速率(R_ET)日均值最高。【结论】库尔勒香梨在80°拉枝角度时光合作用最强,受光抑制较弱,80°拉枝角度可作为中矮1号矮化中间砧库尔勒香梨幼树整形栽培的较适宜拉枝角度。

关键词: 库尔勒香梨, 拉枝角度, 矮化砧木, 光合特性, 叶绿素荧光

CLC Number:

S661.2

CUI Huimin, Abulaike Niyazi, WANG Ruizhe, FAN Guoquan, Mansur Nasir. Effects of Branch Angle on the Dwarf Interstock Zhongai 1 Photosynthetic Fluorescence Parameters of Korla Fragrant Pear[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(11): 2644-2651.

崔慧敏, 阿布来克・尼牙孜, 王睿哲, 樊国全, 曼苏尔・那斯尔. 拉枝角度对中矮1号矮化中间砧库尔勒香梨光合荧光参数的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(11): 2644-2651.

Figures/Tables 4

References 22

[1]	马建江, 张萍, 薛根生. 新疆巴州库尔勒香梨发展分析与建议[J]. 北方园艺, 2016,(5):191-194.
	MA Jianjiang, ZHANG Ping, XUE Gensheng. Analysis and suggestions on the development of fragrant pears in Korla, Bazhou, Xinjiang[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2016,(5):191-194.
[2]	阿布来克·尼牙孜, 章世奎, 樊国全, 等. 不同矮化中间砧木对库尔勒香梨光合特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(9):1681-1688. DOI
	Abulaike Niyazi, ZHANG Shikui, FAN Guoquan, et al. Effects of different dwarf intermediate rootstocks on photosynthetic characteristics of Korla fragrant pear[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(9): 1681-1688. DOI
[3]	周伟权, 杨文莉, 杨花花, 等. PP_(333)对库尔勒香梨抗寒性的影响研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2017, 54(7):1259-1268.
	ZHOU Weiquan, YANG Wenli, YANG Huahua, et al. Study on the effect of PP_(333) on the cold resistance of Korla fragrant pear[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 54(7):1259-1268.
[4]	樊慧敏, 赵志军, 程福厚, 等. 不同梨品种的光合特性研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2010, 37(11):115-117.
	FAN Huimin, ZHAO Zhijun, CHENG Fuhou, et al. Study on photosynthetic characteristics of different pear varieties[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 37(11):115-117.
[5]	孙志鸿, 魏钦平, 杨朝选, 等. 改良高干开心形富士苹果树冠不同层次相对光照强度分布与枝叶的关系[J]. 果树学报, 2008,(2):145-150.
	SUN Zhihong, WEI Qinping, YANG Chaoxuan, et al. The relationship between relative light intensity distribution and branches and leaves at different levels of the canopy of an improved high-stemmed happy-shaped Fuji apple tree[J]. Journal of Fruit Trees, 2008,(2):145-150.
[6]	艾沙江·买买提, 阿布都外力·木米尼, 王晶晶, 等. 富士苹果短截、拉枝对当年生新梢叶片光合特性的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2013, 18(6):126-131.
	Aishajiang Maimaiti, Abduwaili Mumini, WANG Jingjing, et al. Effects of truncation and branching of Fuji apples on photosynthetic characteristics of new shoots of the current year[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2013, 18(6):126-131.
[7]	高建国. 红富士苹果树生长季修剪关键技术[J]. 西北园艺(果树), 2005, (2):44-44.
	GAO Jianguo. Key techniques for pruning of red Fuji apple trees in the growing season[J]. Northwest Horticulture (Fruit Trees), 2005, (2):44-44.
[8]	王涛. 南方早熟梨幼树拉枝试验报告[J]. 西南园艺, 2004,(4):20-21.
	WANG Tao. Report on the branch pulling experiment of early-ripening pear saplings in the south[J]. Southwest Horticulture, 2004,(4):20-21.
[9]	廖立安, 李志光, 曹建明. 翠冠梨引种试验及整形拉枝对其经济性状的影响[J]. 中南林学院学报, 2003,(2):79-81.
	LIAO Li'an, LI Zhiguang, CAO Jianming. The introduction test of Cuiguan pear and the effect of shaping and branching on its economic characters[J]. Journal of Central South Forestry University, 2003,(2):79-81.
[10]	王振磊, 林敏娟, 付银洋, 等. 不同拉枝角度对富士苹果树体生理特性和果实品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2013, 50(8):1462-1467.
	WANG Zhenlei, LIN Minjuan, FU Yinyang, et al. Effects of different branching angles on the physiological characteristics and fruit quality of Fuji apple trees[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 50(8): 1462-1467.
[11]	赵国栋, 贾林光, 张新生, 等. 拉枝角度对‘宫崎短枝富士’树体生长、果实品质和质地的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2021, 30(1):102-108.
	ZHAO Guodong, JIA Linguang, ZHANG Xinsheng, et al. Effects of branch pulling angle on tree growth, fruit quality and texture of 'Miyazaki short-branched Fuji'[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2021, 30(1): 102-108.
[12]	赵世荣, 廖康, 成小龙, 等. 不同成熟期杏品种光合特性差异分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2013, 50(7):1206-1212.
	ZHAO Shirong, LIAO Kang, CHENG Xiaolong, et al. Differences in photosynthetic characteristics of apricot varieties at different maturity stages[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 50(7): 1206-1212.
[13]	丁想, 周伟权, 麦合木提·图如普, 等. 刻芽和拉枝对库尔勒香梨生长发育的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(11):2084-2093. DOI
	DING Xiang, ZHOU Weiquan, Maihemuti Tulupu, et al. Effects of cutting buds and pulling branches on the growth and development of Korla fragrant pears[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(11): 2084-2093. DOI
[14]	冯毓琴, 张永茂, 李翠红, 等. 拉枝角度对‘烟富6号’苹果树生长、生理特性及果实品质的影响[J]. 中国果树, 2016,(6):1-7.
	FENG Yuqin, ZHANG Yongmao, LI Cuihong, et al. Effects of branch pulling angle on the growth, physiological characteristics and fruit quality of apple tree ‘Yanfu No. 6’[J]. China Fruit Tree, 2016,(6): 1-7.
[15]	马瑞娟, 张斌斌, 俞明亮, 等. 6个桃品种光合特性及叶绿素荧光特性比较[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2010, 26(6):1334-1341.
	MA Ruijuan, ZHANG Binbin, YU Mingliang, et al. Comparison of photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of six peach varieties[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Journal, 2010, 26(6): 1334-1341.
[16]	牛莹莹, 廖康, 赵世荣, 等. 不同栽植密度库尔勒香梨光合及叶绿素荧光特性比较[J]. 经济林研究, 2017, 35(1):8-14.
	NIU Yingying, LIAO Kang, ZHAO Shirong, et al. Comparison of photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of Korla fragrant pear with different planting densities[J]. Economic Forest Research, 2017, 35(1): 8-14.
[17]	陈贤田, 柯世省. 茶树光合“午休”的原因分析[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2002,(3):80-83.
	CHEN Xiantian, KE Shisheng. Analysis of the reasons for the "lunch break" of tea tree photosynthesis[J]. Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2002,(3):80-83.
[18]	吴鲜亮, 何志爱, 杨勇. 拉枝对苹果梨幼树生长发育的影响[J]. 内蒙古农业科技, 2008,(1):54-55, 57.
	WU Xianliang, HE Zhiai, YANG Yong. Effects of branch pulling on the growth and development of apple and pear saplings[J]. Inner Mongolia Agricultural Science and Technology, 2008,(1):54-55, 57.
[19]	位杰, 蒋媛, 马建江, 等. 拉枝角度对库尔勒香梨枝叶生长及果实品质的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2018, 33(3):111-116.
	WEI Jie, JIANG Yuan, MA Jianjiang, et al. Effects of branch pulling angle on the growth of branches and leaves and fruit quality of Korla fragrant pear[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2018, 33(3): 111-116.
[20]	李鹏民, 高辉远, Reto J.Strasser. 快速叶绿素荧光诱导动力学分析在光合作用研究中的应用[J]. 植物生理与分子生物学学报, 2005,(6):559-566. PMID
	LI Pengmin, GAO Huiyuan, Reto J. Strasser. Application of Fast Chlorophyll Fluorescence Induction Kinetic Analysis in Photosynthesis Research[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology, 2005,(6):559-566. PMID
[21]	王世伟, 潘存德, 张大海, 等. 新疆11个杏品种叶绿素荧光特征比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2010, 47(4):637-643.
	WANG Shiwei, PAN Cunde, ZHANG Dahai, et al. Comparison of chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of 11 apricot varieties in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 47(4): 637-643.
[22]	张秋英, 李发东, 刘孟雨, 等. 水分胁迫对小麦旗叶叶绿素a荧光参数和光合速率的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2002,(3):80-84.
	ZHANG Qiuying, LI Fadong, LIU Mengyu, et al. Effects of water stress on chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters and photosynthetic rate of wheat flag leaves[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2002,(3):80-84.

处理 Treatment	净光合速率P_n (μmol/(m²·s))	气孔导度G_s (mol/(m²·s))	胞间CO₂浓度 C_i(μL/L)	蒸腾速率T_r (mol/(m²·s))	水分利用E_wu (mmol/mol)	气孔限制值 L_s
T₁	8.15±0.19^c	0.20±0.02^a	262.61±3.73^c	10.40±0.13^b	0.92±0.09^b	0.32±0.01^a
T₂	9.25±0.45^b	0.19±0.01^a	279.16±3.98^b	9.56±0.22^c	1.03±0.22^c	0.33±0.01^a
T₃	10.04±0.21^a	0.22±0.01^a	287.13±4.25^a	11.20±0.35^a	1.12±0.35^a	0.32±0.01^a
T₄	6.41±0.41^d	0.15±0.02^b	269.21±3.72^c	7.15±0.20^d	1.15±0.20^a	0.31±0.01^a

处理 Treatment	净光合速率P_n (μmol/(m²·s))	气孔导度G_s (mol/(m²·s))	胞间CO₂浓度 C_i(μL/L)	蒸腾速率T_r (mol/(m²·s))	水分利用E_wu (mmol/mol)	气孔限制值 L_s
T₁	8.15±0.19^c	0.20±0.02^a	262.61±3.73^c	10.40±0.13^b	0.92±0.09^b	0.32±0.01^a
T₂	9.25±0.45^b	0.19±0.01^a	279.16±3.98^b	9.56±0.22^c	1.03±0.22^c	0.33±0.01^a
T₃	10.04±0.21^a	0.22±0.01^a	287.13±4.25^a	11.20±0.35^a	1.12±0.35^a	0.32±0.01^a
T₄	6.41±0.41^d	0.15±0.02^b	269.21±3.72^c	7.15±0.20^d	1.15±0.20^a	0.31±0.01^a

处理 Treatment	初始荧光 F_o	最大荧光 F_m	PSⅡ最大光能转化效率 F_v/F_m	PSⅡ潜在光化学活性 F_v/F_o	PSⅡ实际光化学效率 Φ_PSⅡ	光化学猝灭系数 C_qp	非光化学猝灭系数 C_NPQ	表观光合电子传递效率 R_ET
T₁	113.76±5.30^a	597.48±22.78^b	0.81±0.04^a	4.96±0.21^ab	0.69±0.02^b	0.93±0.08^a	1.12±0.08^a	3.22±0.17^b
T₂	88.90±3.97^c	651.52±13.91^a	0.84±0.03^a	5.40±0.18^a	0.74±0.02^a	0.99±0.07^a	1.20±0.08^a	3.65±0.14^ab
T₃	105.38±3.72^b	615.95±5.40^b	0.81±0.02^a	4.78±0.30^b	0.76±0.01^a	1.12±0.03^a	1.24±0.06^a	3.91±0.10^a
T₄	90.05±2.94^c	564.67±13.48^c	0.83±0.02^a	4.59±0.29^b	0.75±0.02^a	1.02±0.20^a	0.91±0.07^b	3.56±0.36^ab

处理 Treatment	初始荧光 F_o	最大荧光 F_m	PSⅡ最大光能转化效率 F_v/F_m	PSⅡ潜在光化学活性 F_v/F_o	PSⅡ实际光化学效率 Φ_PSⅡ	光化学猝灭系数 C_qp	非光化学猝灭系数 C_NPQ	表观光合电子传递效率 R_ET
T₁	113.76±5.30^a	597.48±22.78^b	0.81±0.04^a	4.96±0.21^ab	0.69±0.02^b	0.93±0.08^a	1.12±0.08^a	3.22±0.17^b
T₂	88.90±3.97^c	651.52±13.91^a	0.84±0.03^a	5.40±0.18^a	0.74±0.02^a	0.99±0.07^a	1.20±0.08^a	3.65±0.14^ab
T₃	105.38±3.72^b	615.95±5.40^b	0.81±0.02^a	4.78±0.30^b	0.76±0.01^a	1.12±0.03^a	1.24±0.06^a	3.91±0.10^a
T₄	90.05±2.94^c	564.67±13.48^c	0.83±0.02^a	4.59±0.29^b	0.75±0.02^a	1.02±0.20^a	0.91±0.07^b	3.56±0.36^ab