Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (10): 2384-2393.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.10.006
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Cultivation Physiology·Germplasm Resources·Molecular Genetics • Previous Articles Next Articles
CUI Jinxin(), LU Xiaoshuang, LI Shengmei, YANG Tao, PANG Bo, WANG Honggang, GAO Wenwei(
)
Received:
2022-02-03
Online:
2022-10-20
Published:
2022-12-21
Correspondence author:
GAO Wenwei
Supported by:
崔进鑫(), 陆小双, 李生梅, 杨涛, 庞博, 王红刚, 高文伟(
)
通讯作者:
高文伟
作者简介:
崔进鑫(1994-),男,新疆人,硕士研究生,研究方向为农艺与种业,(E-mail)1366707415@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
CUI Jinxin, LU Xiaoshuang, LI Shengmei, YANG Tao, PANG Bo, WANG Honggang, GAO Wenwei. Defoliant on Cotton Defoliation Effect and Its Influence on the Yield of Different Position Fruit Branches[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(10): 2384-2393.
崔进鑫, 陆小双, 李生梅, 杨涛, 庞博, 王红刚, 高文伟. 脱叶剂喷施时间对棉花脱叶效果及不同部位果枝产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(10): 2384-2393.
Fig.2 Effect of spraying time of defoliant on cotton defoliation rate Note: CK:contrast;T1:Apply defoliator when the flocculation rate is 10%-20% (August 29(T1));T2:Apply defoliator when the flocculation rate is 30%-50% (September 5(T2));T2:Apply defoliator when the flocculation rate is 70%-80% (September 12(T3));Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different levels of the same factor at 0.05 level; the same as below
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatlevel | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (kg/hm2) | 皮棉产量 Lint yield (kg/hm2) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) | 铃重 Boll weight (g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
苗宝21号 Miao bao21 | CK | 5 108.93b | 2 284.27a | 46.42a | 4.34a |
T1 | 6 322.89ab | 2 776.04a | 43.21ab | 4.79a | |
T2 | 7 858.56a | 3 262.20a | 41.26b | 4.92a | |
T3 | 6 195.97ab | 2 668.54a | 42.53ab | 4.02a | |
农大1号 Nongda 1 | CK | 4 847.28ab | 2 233.55ab | 45.28a | 4.25a |
T1 | 5 355.91ab | 2 437.47ab | 44.89a | 4.41a | |
T2 | 6 610.52a | 2 993.10a | 42.99a | 4.53a | |
T3 | 4 647.59b | 2 105.75b | 44.41a | 4.42a | |
国新73号 Guoxin 73 | CK | 5 967.38a | 2 582.49a | 43.04a | 5.35a |
T1 | 5 641.79a | 2 427.03a | 43.24a | 5.10a | |
T2 | 5 741.49a | 2 494.47a | 42.95a | 5.27a | |
T3 | 6 032.70a | 2 863.33a | 44.62a | 5.12a | |
C1 | CK | 5 288.98a | 2 320.25a | 43.72ab | 5.04a |
T1 | 4 733.72a | 1 936.50a | 39.26c | 4.64a | |
T2 | 5 404.67a | 2 378.72a | 44.73a | 5.02a | |
T3 | 5 716.38a | 2 377.40a | 41.46bc | 5.26a | |
新陆早37号 Xinluzao 37 | CK | 5 390.87a | 2 310.47a | 43.15a | 4.68a |
T1 | 3 880.23a | 1 722.80a | 42.87a | 3.90b | |
T2 | 3 763.75a | 1 677.77a | 43.37a | 4.63a | |
T3 | 5 082.44a | 2 286.24a | 43.51a | 4.90a | |
P 值 P value | V | 4.43** | 4.203** | 2.379ns | 8.478** |
T | 1.062ns | 1.066ns | 2.59ns | 1.349ns | |
V×T | 1.466ns | 1.326ns | 2.67** | 1.63ns |
Table1 Influence and comparison of yield and yield components of upland cotton under different defoliants
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatlevel | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (kg/hm2) | 皮棉产量 Lint yield (kg/hm2) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) | 铃重 Boll weight (g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
苗宝21号 Miao bao21 | CK | 5 108.93b | 2 284.27a | 46.42a | 4.34a |
T1 | 6 322.89ab | 2 776.04a | 43.21ab | 4.79a | |
T2 | 7 858.56a | 3 262.20a | 41.26b | 4.92a | |
T3 | 6 195.97ab | 2 668.54a | 42.53ab | 4.02a | |
农大1号 Nongda 1 | CK | 4 847.28ab | 2 233.55ab | 45.28a | 4.25a |
T1 | 5 355.91ab | 2 437.47ab | 44.89a | 4.41a | |
T2 | 6 610.52a | 2 993.10a | 42.99a | 4.53a | |
T3 | 4 647.59b | 2 105.75b | 44.41a | 4.42a | |
国新73号 Guoxin 73 | CK | 5 967.38a | 2 582.49a | 43.04a | 5.35a |
T1 | 5 641.79a | 2 427.03a | 43.24a | 5.10a | |
T2 | 5 741.49a | 2 494.47a | 42.95a | 5.27a | |
T3 | 6 032.70a | 2 863.33a | 44.62a | 5.12a | |
C1 | CK | 5 288.98a | 2 320.25a | 43.72ab | 5.04a |
T1 | 4 733.72a | 1 936.50a | 39.26c | 4.64a | |
T2 | 5 404.67a | 2 378.72a | 44.73a | 5.02a | |
T3 | 5 716.38a | 2 377.40a | 41.46bc | 5.26a | |
新陆早37号 Xinluzao 37 | CK | 5 390.87a | 2 310.47a | 43.15a | 4.68a |
T1 | 3 880.23a | 1 722.80a | 42.87a | 3.90b | |
T2 | 3 763.75a | 1 677.77a | 43.37a | 4.63a | |
T3 | 5 082.44a | 2 286.24a | 43.51a | 4.90a | |
P 值 P value | V | 4.43** | 4.203** | 2.379ns | 8.478** |
T | 1.062ns | 1.066ns | 2.59ns | 1.349ns | |
V×T | 1.466ns | 1.326ns | 2.67** | 1.63ns |
因素 Factor | 因素水平 Factor level | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (kg/hm2) | 皮棉产量 Lint yield (kg/hm2) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) | 铃重 Boll weight (g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
品种 Variety (V) | 苗宝21号 | 2 123.83a | 915.95a | 0.43ab | 4.52b |
农大1号 | 1 788.41bc | 885.11a | 0.44a | 4.40b | |
国新73号 | 1 948.64ab | 863.93a | 0.4 | 5.21a | |
C1 | 1 761.92bc | 793.15a | 0.42b | 4.99a | |
新陆早37号 | 1 509.75c | 666.45b | 0.43ab | 4.53b | |
处理水平 Treatlevel (T) | CK | 1 728.91a | 753.34a | 0.44a | 4.73a |
T1 | 1 958.67a | 853.75a | 0.42b | 4.57a | |
T2 | 1 845.08a | 820.06a | 0.43ab | 4.87a | |
T3 | 1 773.52a | 872.54a | 0.43ab | 4.75a | |
果枝位置 Fruiting branch position (FB) | UL1-3 | 856.71c | 400.44c | 0.41b | 4.31b |
ML4-6 | 1 862.33b | 852.52b | 0.44a | 4.95a | |
LL≥7 | 2 760.45a | 1 221.75a | 0.44a | 4.94a | |
P 值 P value | V | 5.05** | 5.027** | 2.124ns | 8.715** |
T | 1.211ns | 1.747** | 2.313ns | 1.387ns | |
FB | 145.91** | 143.372** | 18.455** | 15.966** | |
V×T | 1.671ns | 1.916* | 2.384** | 1.676ns | |
V×FB | 1.069ns | 1.362ns | 1.478ns | 3.929** | |
T×FB | 0.707ns | 2.712** | 1.792ns | 2.296* | |
V×T×FB | 1.093ns | 1.365* | 1.244ns | 1.343ns |
Table 2 Yield statistics and interactive comparison under different defoliants, varieties and branch locations
因素 Factor | 因素水平 Factor level | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (kg/hm2) | 皮棉产量 Lint yield (kg/hm2) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) | 铃重 Boll weight (g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
品种 Variety (V) | 苗宝21号 | 2 123.83a | 915.95a | 0.43ab | 4.52b |
农大1号 | 1 788.41bc | 885.11a | 0.44a | 4.40b | |
国新73号 | 1 948.64ab | 863.93a | 0.4 | 5.21a | |
C1 | 1 761.92bc | 793.15a | 0.42b | 4.99a | |
新陆早37号 | 1 509.75c | 666.45b | 0.43ab | 4.53b | |
处理水平 Treatlevel (T) | CK | 1 728.91a | 753.34a | 0.44a | 4.73a |
T1 | 1 958.67a | 853.75a | 0.42b | 4.57a | |
T2 | 1 845.08a | 820.06a | 0.43ab | 4.87a | |
T3 | 1 773.52a | 872.54a | 0.43ab | 4.75a | |
果枝位置 Fruiting branch position (FB) | UL1-3 | 856.71c | 400.44c | 0.41b | 4.31b |
ML4-6 | 1 862.33b | 852.52b | 0.44a | 4.95a | |
LL≥7 | 2 760.45a | 1 221.75a | 0.44a | 4.94a | |
P 值 P value | V | 5.05** | 5.027** | 2.124ns | 8.715** |
T | 1.211ns | 1.747** | 2.313ns | 1.387ns | |
FB | 145.91** | 143.372** | 18.455** | 15.966** | |
V×T | 1.671ns | 1.916* | 2.384** | 1.676ns | |
V×FB | 1.069ns | 1.362ns | 1.478ns | 3.929** | |
T×FB | 0.707ns | 2.712** | 1.792ns | 2.296* | |
V×T×FB | 1.093ns | 1.365* | 1.244ns | 1.343ns |
品种 Varieity | 处理 Trea tmet | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield(kg/hm2) | 皮棉产量 Lint yield(kg/hm2) | 衣分 Lint percentage(%) | 铃重 Boll weight(g) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UL1-3 | ML4-6 | LL≥7 | UL1-3 | ML4-6 | LL≥7 | UL1-3 | ML4-6 | LL≥7 | UL1-3 | ML4-6 | LL≥7 | ||
苗宝21号 Miaobao 21 | CK | 1 095.4a | 1 726.3a | 2 287.1c | 506.0a | 864.7a | 913.4c | 46.70a | 51.39a | 41.20a | 4.30a | 4.35a | 4.36b |
T1 | 1 158.9a | 2 212.0a | 2 951.7ab | 486.7a | 1 004.4a | 1 284.8ab | 40.68a | 45.23a | 43.75a | 3.91a | 4.70a | 5.76a | |
T2 | 1 659.3a | 2 376.5a | 3 822.6a | 676.2a | 1 002.1a | 1 583.7a | 40.75a | 41.66a | 41.38a | 4.99a | 4.94a | 4.84ab | |
T3 | 1 228.9a | 1 776.5a | 3 190.4ab | 514.6a | 751.6a | 1 402.1a | 41.69a | 42.00a | 43.93a | 3.85a | 3.61a | 4.58b | |
农大1号 Nongda 1 | CK | 648.3a | 1 873.0b | 2 325.9a | 879.2a | 1 131.6a | 1 074.0a | 42.28ab | 47.39a | 46.18a | 3.92a | 4.39a | 4.45a |
T1 | 822.4a | 1 823.5b | 2 709.8a | 361.2b | 824.8ab | 1 251.3a | 37.23b | 45.51a | 45.91a | 3.69a | 5.40a | 4.14a | |
T2 | 524.3a | 2 934.5a | 3 151.5a | 194.3b | 1 306.5a | 1 492.1a | 43.25a | 44.42a | 47.34a | 4.01a | 5.21a | 4.36a | |
T3 | 622.0a | 1 269.4b | 2 756.1a | 260.8b | 577.2b | 1 267.6a | 41.85ab | 45.43a | 45.97a | 3.74a | 4.87a | 4.65a | |
国新73号 Guoxin 73 | CK | 638.6a | 2 086.7a | 3 241.9a | 267.1a | 911.2a | 1 404.0a | 42.04a | 43.77a | 46.56a | 5.04a | 5.32a | 5.69a |
T1 | 956.2a | 1 921.6a | 2 763.8a | 402.4a | 830.5a | 1 194.0a | 42.39a | 44.91a | 43.32b | 4.47a | 5.60a | 5.22a | |
T2 | 968.1a | 1 881.5a | 2 891.8a | 391.8a | 856.7a | 1 245.8a | 39.88a | 45.85a | 43.13b | 4.61a | 5.43a | 5.76a | |
T3 | 605.0a | 2 535.0a | 2 892.6a | 256.3a | 1137.7a | 1469.1a | 41.63a | 43.23a | 43.22b | 4.01a | 5.94a | 5.43a | |
C1 | CK | 1 196.6a | 1 726.8a | 2 365.4a | 784.5a | 1 009.8a | 1 030.8a | 42.1 | 45.94a | 43.12a | 4.96a | 5.42a | 4.73a |
T1 | 464.7a | 1 335.8a | 2 933.1a | 169.0c | 541.2a | 1 226.2a | 39.15b | 44.27b | 45.19a | 4.37a | 4.47a | 5.09a | |
T2 | 1 387.5a | 1 851.5a | 2 165.5a | 606. | 832.0a | 940.4a | 46.16a | 44.7 | 43.32a | 5.55a | 5.06a | 4.44a | |
T3 | 1 247.6a | 1 673.9a | 2 794.8a | 488. | 703.0a | 1 185.3a | 40.6 | 41.5 | 42.20a | 5.82a | 5.22a | 4.74a | |
新陆早37号 Xinluzao 37 | CK | 598.2a | 2 451.9a | 2 340.6a | 245.2a | 1 068.9a | 996.3a | 43.42a | 43.56a | 42.48b | 3.3 | 4.9 | 5.81a |
T1 | 311.3a | 1 236.8b | 2 332.0a | 123.1a | 544.4b | 1 055.1a | 39.15a | 44.27a | 45.1 | 2.39b | 4.4 | 4.83a | |
T2 | 486.8a | 919.0b | 2 357.9a | 187.4a | 412.2b | 1 078.0a | 39.27a | 44.88a | 45.99a | 5.00a | 4.34b | 4.56a | |
T3 | 514.6a | 1 633. | 2 934.2a | 207.6a | 738. | 1 340.2a | 39.73a | 45.49a | 45.3 | 4.19a | 5.30a | 5.23a | |
P值 P value | V | 5.505** | 1.762ns | 2.377ns | 5.638** | 2.014ns | 2.184ns | 0.545ns | 1.092ns | 6.386** | 6.129** | 4.227** | 6.345** |
T | 0.779ns | 0.758ns | 1.905ns | 0.653ns | 1.048ns | 2.729ns | 1.892ns | 2.381ns | 1.313ns | 4.234* | 0.081ns | 0.465ns | |
V×T | 0.806ns | 1.987ns | 1.098ns | 0.865ns | 1.844ns | 1.132ns | 1.736ns | 1.762ns | 1.002ns | 1.353ns | 1.357** | 1.81ns |
Table 3 Effect of defoliant on the yield in different parts of Cotton
品种 Varieity | 处理 Trea tmet | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield(kg/hm2) | 皮棉产量 Lint yield(kg/hm2) | 衣分 Lint percentage(%) | 铃重 Boll weight(g) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UL1-3 | ML4-6 | LL≥7 | UL1-3 | ML4-6 | LL≥7 | UL1-3 | ML4-6 | LL≥7 | UL1-3 | ML4-6 | LL≥7 | ||
苗宝21号 Miaobao 21 | CK | 1 095.4a | 1 726.3a | 2 287.1c | 506.0a | 864.7a | 913.4c | 46.70a | 51.39a | 41.20a | 4.30a | 4.35a | 4.36b |
T1 | 1 158.9a | 2 212.0a | 2 951.7ab | 486.7a | 1 004.4a | 1 284.8ab | 40.68a | 45.23a | 43.75a | 3.91a | 4.70a | 5.76a | |
T2 | 1 659.3a | 2 376.5a | 3 822.6a | 676.2a | 1 002.1a | 1 583.7a | 40.75a | 41.66a | 41.38a | 4.99a | 4.94a | 4.84ab | |
T3 | 1 228.9a | 1 776.5a | 3 190.4ab | 514.6a | 751.6a | 1 402.1a | 41.69a | 42.00a | 43.93a | 3.85a | 3.61a | 4.58b | |
农大1号 Nongda 1 | CK | 648.3a | 1 873.0b | 2 325.9a | 879.2a | 1 131.6a | 1 074.0a | 42.28ab | 47.39a | 46.18a | 3.92a | 4.39a | 4.45a |
T1 | 822.4a | 1 823.5b | 2 709.8a | 361.2b | 824.8ab | 1 251.3a | 37.23b | 45.51a | 45.91a | 3.69a | 5.40a | 4.14a | |
T2 | 524.3a | 2 934.5a | 3 151.5a | 194.3b | 1 306.5a | 1 492.1a | 43.25a | 44.42a | 47.34a | 4.01a | 5.21a | 4.36a | |
T3 | 622.0a | 1 269.4b | 2 756.1a | 260.8b | 577.2b | 1 267.6a | 41.85ab | 45.43a | 45.97a | 3.74a | 4.87a | 4.65a | |
国新73号 Guoxin 73 | CK | 638.6a | 2 086.7a | 3 241.9a | 267.1a | 911.2a | 1 404.0a | 42.04a | 43.77a | 46.56a | 5.04a | 5.32a | 5.69a |
T1 | 956.2a | 1 921.6a | 2 763.8a | 402.4a | 830.5a | 1 194.0a | 42.39a | 44.91a | 43.32b | 4.47a | 5.60a | 5.22a | |
T2 | 968.1a | 1 881.5a | 2 891.8a | 391.8a | 856.7a | 1 245.8a | 39.88a | 45.85a | 43.13b | 4.61a | 5.43a | 5.76a | |
T3 | 605.0a | 2 535.0a | 2 892.6a | 256.3a | 1137.7a | 1469.1a | 41.63a | 43.23a | 43.22b | 4.01a | 5.94a | 5.43a | |
C1 | CK | 1 196.6a | 1 726.8a | 2 365.4a | 784.5a | 1 009.8a | 1 030.8a | 42.1 | 45.94a | 43.12a | 4.96a | 5.42a | 4.73a |
T1 | 464.7a | 1 335.8a | 2 933.1a | 169.0c | 541.2a | 1 226.2a | 39.15b | 44.27b | 45.19a | 4.37a | 4.47a | 5.09a | |
T2 | 1 387.5a | 1 851.5a | 2 165.5a | 606. | 832.0a | 940.4a | 46.16a | 44.7 | 43.32a | 5.55a | 5.06a | 4.44a | |
T3 | 1 247.6a | 1 673.9a | 2 794.8a | 488. | 703.0a | 1 185.3a | 40.6 | 41.5 | 42.20a | 5.82a | 5.22a | 4.74a | |
新陆早37号 Xinluzao 37 | CK | 598.2a | 2 451.9a | 2 340.6a | 245.2a | 1 068.9a | 996.3a | 43.42a | 43.56a | 42.48b | 3.3 | 4.9 | 5.81a |
T1 | 311.3a | 1 236.8b | 2 332.0a | 123.1a | 544.4b | 1 055.1a | 39.15a | 44.27a | 45.1 | 2.39b | 4.4 | 4.83a | |
T2 | 486.8a | 919.0b | 2 357.9a | 187.4a | 412.2b | 1 078.0a | 39.27a | 44.88a | 45.99a | 5.00a | 4.34b | 4.56a | |
T3 | 514.6a | 1 633. | 2 934.2a | 207.6a | 738. | 1 340.2a | 39.73a | 45.49a | 45.3 | 4.19a | 5.30a | 5.23a | |
P值 P value | V | 5.505** | 1.762ns | 2.377ns | 5.638** | 2.014ns | 2.184ns | 0.545ns | 1.092ns | 6.386** | 6.129** | 4.227** | 6.345** |
T | 0.779ns | 0.758ns | 1.905ns | 0.653ns | 1.048ns | 2.729ns | 1.892ns | 2.381ns | 1.313ns | 4.234* | 0.081ns | 0.465ns | |
V×T | 0.806ns | 1.987ns | 1.098ns | 0.865ns | 1.844ns | 1.132ns | 1.736ns | 1.762ns | 1.002ns | 1.353ns | 1.357** | 1.81ns |
[1] | 李福才, 赵国苓, 都占元. 推行棉花机械采摘势在必行[J]. 中国纤检, 2011,(23):25-26. |
LI Fucai, ZHAO Guoling, DU Zhanyuan. It is imperative to implement cotton mechanical picking[J]. China Fiber Inspection, 2011,(23):25-26. | |
[2] | 王志坚, 徐红. 新疆机采棉的调研与发展建议[J]. 中国棉花, 2011, 38(6): 10-13. |
WANG Zhijian, XU Hong. Investigation and Development Suggestions for Xinjiang Mechanical Picking Cotton[J]. China Cotton, 2011, 38(6): 10-13. | |
[3] | 陶湘伟, 陈兴和. 机采棉技术与发展趋势分析[J]. 农业机械, 2013,(13): 97-102. |
TAO Xiangwei, CHEN Xinghe. Analysis on the technology and development trend of mechanical cotton harvesting[J]. Agricultural Machinery, 2013,(13): 97-102. | |
[4] | 樊庆鲁. 棉花脱叶与催熟应用技术研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2008. |
FAN Qinglu. Research on cotton defoliation and ripening application technology[D]. Yangling: Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forestry, 2008. | |
[5] | 王莉, 杜珉. 中美棉花生产成本比较分析[J]. 农业展望, 2006, 2 (7): 12-13. |
WANG Li, DU Min. Comparative analysis of cotton production costs between China and the United States[J]. Agricultural Outlook, 2006, 2 (7): 12-13. | |
[6] | 刘向新, 闫向辉, 周亚立. 新疆生产建设兵团机采棉试验、推广应用及特点[J]. 农业机械, 2009(6):73-74. |
LIU Xiangxin, YAN Xianghui, ZHOU Yali. Experiment, popularization and application of cotton picking machine in Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps[J]. Agricultural Machinery, 2009(6): 73-74. | |
[7] | 张杰, 刘林. 新疆兵团机采棉与手采棉经济效益比较研究[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2013, 34(3):372-375. |
ZHANG Jie, LIU Lin. A comparative study on the economic benefits of machine-picked cotton and hand-picked cotton in Xinjiang Corps[J]. Agricultural Modernization Research, 2013, 34(3):372-375. | |
[8] | 张丽娟, 夏绍南, 崔爱花. 几种棉花脱叶催熟剂在鄱阳湖棉区的应用效果初探[J]. 江西农业学报, 2013, 25(5):16-18. |
ZHANG Lijuan, XIA Shaonan, CUI Aihua. The application effect of several cotton defoliation and ripening agents in Poyang Lake cotton area[J]. Acta Agriculture Jiangxi, 2013, 25(5): 16-18. | |
[9] | 贾军成, 樊庆鲁. 不同种类棉花脱叶剂比较试验研究[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2011,(3):44-46. |
JIA Juncheng, FAN Qinglu. Comparative study on different types of cotton defoliants[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Reclamation Science and Technology, 2011,(3): 44-46. | |
[10] | 李福才, 赵国苓, 都占元. 推行棉花机械采摘势在必行[J]. 中国纤检, 2011,(23): 30-31. |
LI Fucai, ZHAO Guoling, DU Zhanyuan. It is imperative to implement cotton mechanical picking[J]. China Fiber Inspection, 2011,(23): 30-31. | |
[11] | Gwathmey C O, Hayes R M. Harvest-aid interactions under different temperature regimes in field-grown cotton[J]. Journal of Cotton Science, 1997, 1(1): 1-9. |
[12] |
Du M W, Ren X M, Tian X L, et al. Evaluation of harvest aid chemicals for the cotton-winter wheat double cropping system[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2013, 12(2):273-282
DOI URL |
[13] | 王晓婧, 李思嘉, 刘瑞显. 棉花施用脱叶剂对相邻未着药叶片生理活性的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2019, 31(1):64-71. |
WANG Xiaojing, LI Sijia, LIU Ruixian. Effects of applying defoliants to cotton on the physiological activities of adjacent untreated leaves[J]. Cotton Science, 2019, 31(1):64-71. | |
[14] | 李林林, 白玉超, 刘楠楠, 等. 化学脱叶剂及催熟剂在农作物上的应用现状[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34 (12): 132-135. |
LI Linlin, BAI Yuchao, LIU Nannan, et al. Application status of chemical defoliants and ripening agents on crops[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(12): 132-135. | |
[15] |
Cathey G W, Luckett K E, Rayburn Jr S T. Accelerated cotton boll dehiscence with growth regulator and desiccant chemicals[J]. Field Crops Research, 1982, 5: 113-120.
DOI URL |
[16] |
Bange M P, Long R L. Optimizing Timing of Chemical Harvest Aid Application in Cotton by Predicting Its Influence on Fiber Quality[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2011, 103(2):390-395.
DOI URL |
[17] | Larson J A, Gwathmey C O, Hayes R M. Cotton defoliation and harvest timing effects on yields, quality, and net revenues[J]. Journal Cotton Science, 2002, 6: 13-27. |
[18] | Gormus O, Kurt F, Sabagh A E. Impact of defoliation timings and leaf pubescence on yield and fiber quality of cotton[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science & Technology, 2017, 19(4):903-915. |
[19] |
Tian J S, Zhang X Y, Yang Y L, et al. How to reduce cotton fiber damage in the Xinjiang, China[J]. Industrial Crops and Products, 2017, 109: 803-811.
DOI URL |
[20] | 高丽丽. 脱叶剂喷施时间对棉花生理调节效应的研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2016. |
GAO Lili. Study on the effect of defoliant spraying time on cotton physiological regulation[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2016. | |
[21] | 宋兴虎. 在不同棉区噻苯隆和乙烯利用量及配比对脱叶催熟效果影响[J]. 棉花学报. 2020, 32(3):247-257. |
SONG Xinghu. The effect of thidiazuron and ethylene utilization and ratio on defoliation and ripening effects in different cotton areas[J]. Cotton Science, 2020, 32(3):247-257. | |
[22] | 马立刚, 王树林, 王燕. 脱叶催熟剂用量对不同棉花品种脱叶效果及产量构成与品质的影响[J]. 山西农业大学学报. 2019, 39(5), 16-22. |
MA Ligang, WANG Shulin, WANG Yan. Effects of defoliation ripening agent dosage on defoliation effect, yield composition and quality of different cotton varieties[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University, 2019, 39(5), 16-22. | |
[23] | 王谊, 杨丽红. 脱叶剂对棉花脱叶率和产量的影响[J]. 中国棉花, 2014, 41(4): 28-30. |
WANG Yi, YANG Lihong. The effect of defoliant on cotton defoliation rate and yield[J]. China Cotton, 2014, 41(4): 28-30. | |
[24] | 姜伟丽, 马艳, 马小艳, 等. 不同脱叶催熟剂在棉花上的应用效果[J]. 中国棉花, 2013, 4(10):11-14. |
JIANG Weili, MA Yan, MA Xiaoyan, et al. Application effects of different defoliation ripening agents on cotton[J]. China Cotton, 2013, 4(10):11-14. | |
[25] | 宋敏, 高文伟, 李贤超. 脱叶剂瑞脱龙对新疆石河子主栽机采棉品种脱叶敏感性和吐絮率的的影响分析.[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2016, 39(1): 40-44. |
SONG Min, GAO Wenwei, LI Xianchao. Analysis of the effect of defoliant Ruituolong on the defoliation sensitivity and flocculation rate of main machine-harvested cotton varieties in Shihezi, Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2016, 39(1): 40-44. | |
[26] | 王香茹, 张恒恒, 胡莉婷. 新疆棉区棉花脱叶催熟剂的筛选研究[J]. 中国棉花, 2018, 45(2):8-14. |
WANG Xiangru, ZHANG Hengheng, HU Liting. Screening of cotton defoliation and ripening agents in Xinjiang cotton area[J]. China Cotton, 2018, 45(2):8-14. | |
[27] | 雷斌, 张云生, 李忠华. 棉花脱叶剂的田间效果筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2011, 48(12):2321-2324. |
LEI Bin, ZHANG Yunsheng, LI Zhonghua. The field effect screening of cotton defoliants[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 48(12):2321-2324. | |
[28] | 马辉, 戴路, 李静. 棉花脱叶催熟剂综合性状效果试验研究[J]. 中国棉花, 2013, 40(4):15-17. |
MA Hui, DAI Lu, LI Jing. Experimental study on comprehensive characteristics of cotton defoliation and ripening agent[J]. China Cotton, 2013, 40(4):15-17. | |
[29] | 赵战胜, 邢晓东, 张庭军. 脱叶剂喷洒时期对棉花产量性状及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2014,(9):34-35. |
ZHAO Zhansheng, XING Xiaodong, ZHANg Tingjun. The effect of defoliant spraying period on cotton yield traits and quality[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Reclamation Science and Technology, 2014,(9):34-35. |
[1] | FANG Hui, DING Yindeng, FAN Guiqiang, GAO Yonghong, HUANG Tianrong. Research report on the development status of wheat industry in southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 75-80. |
[2] | LI Yongtai, GAO Axiang, LI Yanjun, ZHANG Xinyu. Effects of defoliants on the physiological characteristics of cotton varieties with different sensitivities [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2094-2102. |
[3] | ZHANG Zehua, YE Hanchun, WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao, LI Haiqiang, LIU Jian. Effects of equal nitrogen applied with urease inhibitor on cotton growth, yield, and quality under mulched drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111. |
[4] | CHEN Ruijie, LUO Linyi, RUAN Xiangyang, YE Jun. Effects of humic acid on soil nutrients, cotton yield and quality in cotton fields under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121. |
[5] | HUANG Boxuan, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, SHAO Jingjing, FENG Weina, PANG Chaoyou, XU Wenxiu, DONG Helin. Effects of different nitrogen inhibitors on growth, nitrogen utilization and yield of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131. |
[6] | CHEN Fang, LI Zihui, SUNXiaogui , ZHANG Tingjun. Different dosage of microbial agents on the yield and quality of processed tomatoes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289. |
[7] | ZHANG Chengjie, HU Haoran, DUAN Songjiang, WU Yifan, ZHANG Jusong. Effects of nitrogen-dense interaction on growth, development, yield and quality of Gossypium barbadense L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830. |
[8] | HOU Lili, WANG Wei, CUI Xinju, ZHOU Dawei. Effects of organic and inorganic combined application on yield, soil nutrients and enzyme activities of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1845-1852. |
[9] | CHEN Fang, LI Zihui, WANG Bingyue, SUN Xiaogui, ZHANG Tingjun. Effects of microbial inoculants on growth and yield of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1853-1860. |
[10] | YUAN Yingying, ZHAO Jinghua, Dilimulati Simayi, YANG Tingrui. Study on physiological indexes and yield analysis of spring wheat in pots based on apriori algorithm [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1861-1871. |
[11] | NIU Tingting, MA Mingsheng, ZHANG Jungao. Effects of straw returning and plastic film mulching on soil physical and chemical properties and spring maize yield in rain-fed upland farmland [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1896-1906. |
[12] | ZHAO Minhua, SONG Bingxi, ZHANG Yupeng, GAO Zhihong, ZHU Yongyong, CHEN Xiaoyuan. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction on rice yield and nitrogen partial factor productivity under dry farming conditions [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1907-1915. |
[13] | ZHANG Caihong, WANG Guoqiang, JIANG Luyan, LIU Tao, DE Xianming. Variation of environmental factors and analysis of tomato traits in low-energy assembly-type deep-winter production solar greenhouse [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 2043-2053. |
[14] | YANG Mei, ZHAO Hongmei, Dilireba Xiamixiding, YANG Weijun, ZHANG Jinshan, HUI Chao. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction and biochar application on population structure, photosynthetic characteristics and yield of spring wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1582-1589. |
[15] | LU Weidan, ZHOU Yuanhang, MA Xiaolong, GAO Jianglong, FAN Xiaoqin, GUO Jianfu, LI Jianqiang, LIN Ming. Effects of replacing chemical fertilizer with organic fertilizer in different proportions and plant nutrients and sugar beet yield [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1631-1639. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text 94
|
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||