Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (9): 2192-2199.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.09.013
• Horticultural Special Local Products·Storage and Preservation Processing·Soil Fertilizer·Water Saving Irrigation·Prataculture·Food Process Engineering • Previous Articles Next Articles
SHAO Huawei1(), MENG Ajing1, TANG Yan2, ZHOU Yan3(
), CHENG Xinying4, TANG Lei3, WANG Xinyong1
Received:
2021-12-10
Online:
2022-09-20
Published:
2023-01-16
Correspondence author:
ZHOU Yan
Supported by:
邵华伟1(), 孟阿静1, 唐燕2, 周燕3(
), 程新瑛4, 唐蕾3, 王新勇1
通讯作者:
周燕
作者简介:
邵华伟(1978-),男,河南上蔡人,副研究员,研究方向为土壤培肥与新型肥料,(E-mail)18666185@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
SHAO Huawei, MENG Ajing, TANG Yan, ZHOU Yan, CHENG Xinying, TANG Lei, WANG Xinyong. Effects of Reducing Fertilizer Application and Increasing Application of Fulvic Acid Potassium Dihydrogen Phosphate Water-soluble Formula Fertilizer on the Growth and Quality of Junzao Jujube[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2192-2199.
邵华伟, 孟阿静, 唐燕, 周燕, 程新瑛, 唐蕾, 王新勇. 化肥减施增施黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥对骏枣生长及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(9): 2192-2199.
处理 Treatment | 施肥种类及用量 Fertilizer type and amount | 总养分 (N+P2O5+K2O) Total nutrients (kg/667m2) | 化肥减施率 Fertilizer reduction rate (%) | 黄腐酸含量 Fulvic acid content (kg/667m2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 尿素45 kg,磷酸一铵50 kg; 硫酸钾35 kg | 69.7 | 0 | 0 |
T1 | 60 kg黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥 | 24.0 | 65% | 6.0 |
T2 | 96 kg黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥 | 38.4 | 45% | 9.6 |
T3 | 120 kg黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥 | 48.0 | 31% | 12.0 |
T4 | 144 kg黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥 | 57.6 | 17% | 14.4 |
Table 1 Test treatment
处理 Treatment | 施肥种类及用量 Fertilizer type and amount | 总养分 (N+P2O5+K2O) Total nutrients (kg/667m2) | 化肥减施率 Fertilizer reduction rate (%) | 黄腐酸含量 Fulvic acid content (kg/667m2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 尿素45 kg,磷酸一铵50 kg; 硫酸钾35 kg | 69.7 | 0 | 0 |
T1 | 60 kg黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥 | 24.0 | 65% | 6.0 |
T2 | 96 kg黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥 | 38.4 | 45% | 9.6 |
T3 | 120 kg黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥 | 48.0 | 31% | 12.0 |
T4 | 144 kg黄腐酸磷酸二氢钾水溶配方肥 | 57.6 | 17% | 14.4 |
处理 Treatment | 枣吊长度 Date hanging length (cm) | 叶片长 Blade length (cm) | 叶片宽 Blade width (cm) |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 63.33±6.81ab | 10.50±1.32a | 5.83±0.29ab |
T1 | 55.00±4.00b | 8.67±2.08a | 4.53±0.58b |
T2 | 64.33±7.77ab | 9.67±1.53a | 4.43±0.21b |
T3 | 71.67±1.53a | 9.83±0.76a | 5.23±0.41b |
T4 | 72.33±1.55a | 11.33±1.89a | 6.83±1.76a |
Table 2 Effects of reducing chemical fertilizer application and increasing application of fulvic acid potassium dihydrogen phosphate water-soluble formula fertilizer on Junzao jujube hanging
处理 Treatment | 枣吊长度 Date hanging length (cm) | 叶片长 Blade length (cm) | 叶片宽 Blade width (cm) |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 63.33±6.81ab | 10.50±1.32a | 5.83±0.29ab |
T1 | 55.00±4.00b | 8.67±2.08a | 4.53±0.58b |
T2 | 64.33±7.77ab | 9.67±1.53a | 4.43±0.21b |
T3 | 71.67±1.53a | 9.83±0.76a | 5.23±0.41b |
T4 | 72.33±1.55a | 11.33±1.89a | 6.83±1.76a |
处理 Treatment | VC含量 VC content(mg/g) | 还原糖 Reducing sugar(%) | 总酸 Acid value(%) | 蛋白质 Protein(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 3.20±0.24d | 30.51±1.49b | 0.60±0.07a | 6.63±0.12a |
T1 | 4.37±0.14c | 33.41±2.25ab | 0.43±0.03bc | 6.42±0.31a |
T2 | 5.73±0.25a | 33.29±1.81ab | 0.47±0.02b | 4.31±0.23c |
T3 | 5.21±0.13b | 34.09±0.58ab | 0.36±0.27c | 5.66±0.49b |
T4 | 4.86±0.39b | 36.74±4.94a | 0.55±0.45a | 6.69±0.41a |
Table 3 Effects of reducing fertilizer application and increasing application of fulvic acid potassium dihydrogen phosphate water-soluble formula fertilizer on yield
处理 Treatment | VC含量 VC content(mg/g) | 还原糖 Reducing sugar(%) | 总酸 Acid value(%) | 蛋白质 Protein(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 3.20±0.24d | 30.51±1.49b | 0.60±0.07a | 6.63±0.12a |
T1 | 4.37±0.14c | 33.41±2.25ab | 0.43±0.03bc | 6.42±0.31a |
T2 | 5.73±0.25a | 33.29±1.81ab | 0.47±0.02b | 4.31±0.23c |
T3 | 5.21±0.13b | 34.09±0.58ab | 0.36±0.27c | 5.66±0.49b |
T4 | 4.86±0.39b | 36.74±4.94a | 0.55±0.45a | 6.69±0.41a |
处理 Treatment | 果形指数 Fruit shape index | 单果重 Dry weight of single fruit(g) | 产量 Yield (kg/667 m2) |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 1.53±0.09b | 13.57±1.02b | 801.38±9.39c |
T1 | 1.73±0.67a | 13.36±0.51b | 756.25±6.77d |
T2 | 1.52±0.36b | 13.96±1.14ab | 804.47±21.03c |
T3 | 1.54±0.11b | 14.09±2.07ab | 881.24±17.05b |
T4 | 1.63±0.08ab | 16.13±0.38a | 910.51±6.21a |
Table 4 Effects of reducing fertilizer application and increasing application of fulvic acid potassium dihydrogen phosphate water-soluble formula fertilizer on the quality of Junzao
处理 Treatment | 果形指数 Fruit shape index | 单果重 Dry weight of single fruit(g) | 产量 Yield (kg/667 m2) |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 1.53±0.09b | 13.57±1.02b | 801.38±9.39c |
T1 | 1.73±0.67a | 13.36±0.51b | 756.25±6.77d |
T2 | 1.52±0.36b | 13.96±1.14ab | 804.47±21.03c |
T3 | 1.54±0.11b | 14.09±2.07ab | 881.24±17.05b |
T4 | 1.63±0.08ab | 16.13±0.38a | 910.51±6.21a |
[1] | 崔亚荣. 化肥减量增施有机肥对骏枣生长的影响[D]. 延安: 延安大学, 2018. |
CUI Yarong. Effects of reducing the amount of chemical fertilizers and increasing the application of organic fertilizers on the growth of Junzao jujube[D]. Yan'an: Yan'an University, 2018. | |
[2] | 包艳丽, 程红梅, 张利召. 新疆红枣产业发展研究[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2022, 33(1):145-146,152. |
BAO Yanli, CHENG Hongmei, ZHANG Lizhao, et al. Research on the development of jujube industry in Xinjiang[J]. Rural Economy and Technology, 2022, 33(1):145-146,152. | |
[3] | 李秀芬, 朱金兆, 顾晓君, 等. 农业面源污染现状与防治进展[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2010, 20(4):81-84. |
LI Xiufen, ZHU Jinzhao, GU Xiaojun, et al. Current Situation and Prevention and Control of Agricultural Non-point Source Pollution[J]. China Population·Resources and Environment, 2010, 20(4):81-84. | |
[4] | 张维理, 武淑霞, 冀宏杰, 等. 中国农业面源污染形势估计及控制对策 I.21世纪初期中国农业面源污染的形势估计[J]. 中国农业科学, 2004,(7):1008-1017. |
ZHANG Weili, WU Shuxia, JI Hongjie, et al.. Situation Estimation and Control Countermeasures of Agricultural Non-point Source Pollution in China I. Situation Estimation of Agricultural Non-point Source Pollution in China in the Early 21st Century[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science, 2004,(7): 1008-1017. | |
[5] |
李东坡, 武志杰. 化学肥料的土壤生态环境效应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008,(5):1158-1165.
PMID |
LI Dongpo, WU Zhijie. Effects of Chemical Fertilizers on Soil Ecological Environment[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008,(5):1158-1165.
PMID |
|
[6] | 张北赢, 陈天林, 王兵. 长期施用化肥对土壤质量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(11):182-187. |
ZHANG Beiying, CHEN Tianlin, WANG Bing. Effects of long-term application of chemical fertilizers on soil quality[J]. China Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 26(11):182-187. | |
[7] |
Ekenler M., Tabatabai M A. Effects of limingand tillage systems on microbial biomass and glycosidases insoils[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2003, 39(1) : 51-61.
DOI URL |
[8] | Matsuyama N, Saigusa M, Sakaiya E, et al. Acidification and Soil Productivity of Allophanic Andosols Affected by Heavy Application of Fertilizers[J]. Soil Science & Plant Nutrition, 2005, 51(1) :117-123. |
[9] | 陆欣欣, 岳玉波, 赵峥, 等. 不同施肥处理稻田系统磷素输移特征研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2014, 22(4):394-400. |
LU Xinxin, YUE Yubo, ZHAO Zheng, et al. Study on the characteristics of phosphorus transport in paddy field systems with different fertilization treatments[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecological Agriculture, 2014, 22(4):394-400. | |
[10] | 王虎兵. 日光温室膜下滴灌番茄对水肥响应的研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2019. |
WANG Hubing. Study on the Response of Tomatoes to Water and Fertilizer by Drip Irrigation under Film in Solar Greenhouse[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2019. | |
[11] |
Tayefeh M, Sadeghi S M, Noorhosseini S A, et al. Environmental impact of rice production based on nitrogen fertilizer use[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25(16):15885 -15895.
DOI URL |
[12] |
Ahmed M, Rauf M, Mukhtar Z, et al. Excessive use of nitrogenous fertilizers: An unawareness causing serious threats environment and human health[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, 24(35):26983-26987.
DOI URL |
[13] | 贺会强, 陈凯利, 邹志荣, 等. 不同施肥水平对日光温室番茄产量和品质的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 40(7):135-140. |
HE Huiqiang, CHEN Kaili, ZOU Zhirong, et al. Effects of different fertilization levels on yield and quality of tomato in solar greenhouse[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Ed.), 2012, 40(7):135-140. | |
[14] | 韩文质. 腐植酸类肥料对土壤的改良作用及施用方法[J]. 甘肃农业科技, 1997,(6):33-34. |
HAN Wenzhi. Effects of humic acid fertilizers on soil improvement and application methods[J]. Gansu Agricultural Science and Technology, 1997,(6):33-34. | |
[15] | 苏初连, 邓爱妮, 范琼, 等. 腐植酸型功能肥料对酸化土壤改良和香蕉生长的作用[J]. 分子植物育种, 2022, 22(6): 1923-1929. |
SU Chulian, DENG Aini, FAN Qiong, et al. Effects of humic acid-type functional fertilizers on acidified soil improvement and banana growth[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2022, 22(6): 1923-1929. | |
[16] | 章智明, 黄占斌, 单瑞娟. 腐植酸对土壤改良作用探讨[J]. 环境与可持续发展, 2013, 38(3):109-111. |
ZHANG Zhiming, HUANG Zhanbin, SHAN Ruijuan. Discussion on the effect of humic acid on soil improvement[J]. Environment and Sustainable Development, 2013, 38(3):109-111. | |
[17] | 王官茂, 杨茂峰, 李志燕, 等. 黄腐酸对马铃薯产量和商品薯率的影响[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2016, 30(1):25-30. |
WANG Guanmao, YANG Maofeng, LI Zhiyan, et al. Effects of fulvic acid on potato yield and commercial potato yield[J]. China Potato, 2016, 30(1):25-30. | |
[18] | 张亚飞, 罗静静, 彭福田, 等. 黄腐酸钾与化肥控释袋促进桃树生长及氮肥吸收利用[J]. 腐植酸, 2019,(6):37. |
ZHANG Yafei, LUO Jingjing, PENG Futian, et al. Potassium humate and chemical fertilizer controlled-release bag to promote peach tree growth and nitrogen fertilizer absorption and utilization[J]. Humic Acid, 2019,(6):37. | |
[19] | 赵世杰, 史国安, 董新纯. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2002. |
ZHAO S J, SHI G A, DONG X C. Guidance of Plant Physiology Experiments>[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2002. | |
[20] | 库尔班江, 赛丽曼. 碘量法测水果蔬菜中维生素 C 的含量[J]. 伊犁师范学院学报(自然科学版), 2007,(3): 29-32. |
Kuerbanjiang, Sailiman. Determination of ascorbic acid in vegetables and fruits by eudiometry[J]. Journal of Yili Normal University (Natural Science Ed.), 2007,(3): 29-32. | |
[21] | 龙建春, 邓浩, 秦江南, 等. 新型黄腐酸肥对新温185核桃提质增效的效果[J]. 落叶果树, 2021, 53(3):24-26. |
LONG Jianchun, DENG Hao, QIN Jiangnan, et al. Effect of new fulvic acid fertilizer on quality improvement and efficiency of Xinwen 185 walnut[J]. Deciduous Fruit Trees, 2021, 53(3):24-26. | |
[22] | 宋挚, 郭新送, 范仲卿, 等. 叶面喷施黄腐酸钾对水稻产量及品质的影响[J]. 腐植酸, 2022,(1):52-55. |
SONG Zhi, GUO Xinsong, FAN Zhongqing, et al. Effects of Foliar Spraying Potassium Fulvic Acid on Rice Yield and Quality[J]. Humic Acid, 2022,(1):52-55. | |
[23] | 张丽丽, 史庆华, 巩彪. 中、碱性土壤条件下黄腐酸与磷肥配施对番茄生育和磷素利用率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(17):3567-3575. |
ZHANG Lili, SHI Qinghua, GONG Biao. Effects of combined application of fulvic acid and phosphorus fertilizer on tomato growth and phosphorus utilization under moderate and alkaline soil conditions[J]. China Agricultural Science, 2020, 53(17):3567-3575. | |
[24] | 何流. 专用配方套餐肥和黄腐酸肥料在富士苹果上的应用[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2018. |
HE Liu. Application of special formula package fertilizer and fulvic acid fertilizer on Fuji apple[D]. Tai'an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2018. | |
[25] | 闫嘉欣, 常青, 杨治平, 等. 黄腐酸液体配方肥对大棚黄瓜产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(10):47-51. |
YAN Jiaxin, CHANG Qing, YANG Zhiping, et al. Effects of fulvic acid liquid formula fertilizer on yield and quality of cucumber in greenhouse[J]. China Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(10):47-51. | |
[26] | 姚东伟. 黄腐酸对番茄生长、产量及光合特性的影响[D]. 晋中: 山西农业大学, 2003. |
Yao Dongwei. Effects of fulvic acid on tomato growth, yield and photosynthetic characteristics[D]. Jinzhong: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2003. | |
[27] |
刘彩娟, 吕春雨, 艾希珍, 等. 黄腐酸对干旱胁迫下黄瓜光合特性及产量和品质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1300-1310..
DOI |
LIU Caijuan, LU Chunyu, AI Xizhen, et al. Effects of fulvic acid on photosynthetic characteristics, yield and quality of cucumber under drought stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(5): 1300-1310.
DOI |
[1] | JIN Juan, LI lili, YANG Lei, FAN Dingyu, HAO Qing. Analysis on the Development status of Xinjiang Jujube Industry [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 106-110. |
[2] | WU Yating, CHEN He, ZHENG Nan, MA Xianlan, ZHOU Lina, ZHAO Yankun. Current situation and development trend prospect of Xinjiang characteristic dairy industry [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 158-162. |
[3] | HOU Xianzheng, XIAO Tong, CHEN Yulan, WEI Jiyu. The spatial effects and mechanism of digital technology innovation on agricultural economic resilience [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 196-205. |
[4] | YUE Rongqiang, ZHANG Qiong, WANG Fang, DENG Wenwen, CHEN Yu, Maiwulanjiang Mamut, Nurmanquli Batur. Improve the academic quality and influence of agricultural academic journals [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 256-260. |
[5] | WANG Junduo, CUI Yujiang, LIANG Yajun, GONG Zhaolong, ZHENG Junyun, LI Xueyuan. Xinjiang cotton production advantageous regional layout scheme [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 60-69. |
[6] | FANG Hui, DING Yindeng, FAN Guiqiang, GAO Yonghong, HUANG Tianrong. Research report on the development status of wheat industry in southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 75-80. |
[7] | YANG Minghua, LIAO Biyong, LIU Qiang, PENG Yuncheng, Dawulai Jiekeshan, FENG Guorui, TANG Shimin. Study on variation of grain nutritional quality of glutinous maize [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2087-2093. |
[8] | ZHANG Zehua, YE Hanchun, WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao, LI Haiqiang, LIU Jian. Effects of equal nitrogen applied with urease inhibitor on cotton growth, yield, and quality under mulched drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111. |
[9] | CHEN Ruijie, LUO Linyi, RUAN Xiangyang, YE Jun. Effects of humic acid on soil nutrients, cotton yield and quality in cotton fields under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121. |
[10] | HUANG Boxuan, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, SHAO Jingjing, FENG Weina, PANG Chaoyou, XU Wenxiu, DONG Helin. Effects of different nitrogen inhibitors on growth, nitrogen utilization and yield of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131. |
[11] | LIU Jing, DU Mingchuan, ZHANG Wenting, BAO Haijuan, JING Meiling, DU Wenhua. Screening of triticale germplasm in different areas of Qinghai [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2183-2190. |
[12] | TIAN Haiyan, ZHANG Zhanqin, XIE Jianhui, WANG Jianjiang, YANG Xiangkun. Study on the relationship between Lycopene and main quality characters of processing tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2197-2202. |
[13] | ZHANG Tingjun, LI Zihui, CUI Yujiang, SUN Xiaogui, CHEN Fang. Effects of microbial agents on cotton growth and soil physico-chemical properties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2269-2276. |
[14] | CHEN Fang, LI Zihui, SUNXiaogui , ZHANG Tingjun. Different dosage of microbial agents on the yield and quality of processed tomatoes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289. |
[15] | QIAO Yajie, FU Huixin, QIAO Xue, MENG Xintao, ZHANG Ting, PAN Yan. Study on the variation of fresh beef quality under different storage temperature conditions [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2323-2329. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||