Study on the Influence of Solanum nigrum L. on Cotton Growth and Its Economic Threshold

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.08.002

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 Solanum nigrum L. is a troublesome weed seriously damaging cotton growth development. The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of Solanum nigrum L. on cotton growth in cotton fields and yield traits and its economic threshold, and provide a scientific basis for the formulation of control parameters on Solanum nigrum L. in cotton fields and its control measures. 【Method】 The effects of different densities of Solanum nigrum L.（0, 1, 4, 7, 10, 15 plants/m²） on cotton agronomic traits and yield traits were investigated in field conditions. Then the functional relationship between different densities of Solanum nigrum L. and cotton yields loss rate was researched by using model fitting method. Control economic thresholds on Solanum nigrum L. in cotton were derived on the basis of the economic infestation level formula. 【Result】 The plant height, stem thick and the number of main stem nodes of cotton decreased with the increase of Solanum nigrum L. density, and Solanum nigrum L. had a significant effect on the middle boll number and yield of cotton（P< 0.05）. When the density of Solanum nigrum L. is 1 plant /m², the loss rate of cotton yield is 60.92%. When the density of Solanum nigrum L. reaches 15 plants /m², the loss rate of cotton yield is 100%. The logarithmic regression model was the best in describing the relationship between Solanum nigrum L. density and yield loss as y =12.594ln（x） + 58.025.According to EIL and the logarithmic regression model, the economic threshold for artificial control of Solanum nigrum L. was 0.016 plants/m², and the economic threshold for chemical control by 96% S-metolachlor EC was 0.017 plants/m². 【Conclusion】 The inhibitory effects of Solanum nigrum L. on cotton were positively correlated with its density.According to the economic threshold analysis, when the density of Solanum nigrum L. in the field is higher than 0.016 plant /m²,it should be controlled in time.

Key words: Solanum nigrum L.; cotton; yield property; economic threshold

摘要：

【目的】研究棉田龙葵对棉花生长和产量性状的影响及其防治经济阈值,为制定棉田龙葵的防治指标和措施提供科学依据。【方法】在大田条件下,研究不同密度（0、1、4、7、10、15株/m²）龙葵持续危害对棉花农艺性状和产量性状的影响,采取模型拟合法分析不同密度龙葵与棉花产量损失率间的函数关系,并根据经济危害允许水平分析龙葵的防治经济阈值。【结果】棉花的株高、茎粗、主茎节数随龙葵密度的增加而降低,龙葵对棉花中部铃铃数和产量具有显著影响（P<0.05）。当龙葵密度为1株/m²时,棉花产量损失率为60.92%;当龙葵密度达到15株/m²时,棉花产量损失率为100%。对数模型y =12.594 ln（X） + 58.025能较好地拟合龙葵密度与棉花产量损失率间的关系,根据经济危害允许水平和对数模型,人工防除龙葵的经济阈值为0.016 株/m²,96%精异丙甲草胺EC化学防除的经济阈值为0.017 株/m²。【结论】龙葵对棉花的抑制效应与其密度呈正相关,当田间龙葵持续危害密度高于0.016 株/m²时,即160 株/hm²,应及时防除。

关键词: 龙葵, 棉花, 产量性状, 经济阈值

CLC Number:

S562

HAN Rui, ZHANG Quancheng, WANG Xiaoli, LIN Ping, WEI Yingfeng, WANG Jungang. Study on the Influence of Solanum nigrum L. on Cotton Growth and Its Economic Threshold[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(8): 1831-1837.

韩睿, 张全成, 王小丽, 林萍, 魏迎凤, 王俊刚. 龙葵对棉花生长的影响及其经济阈值分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(8): 1831-1837.

Figures/Tables 8

References 22

[1]	马小艳, 任相亮, 姜伟丽, 等. 不同萌发期龙葵的生长和繁殖特性比较[J]. 杂草学报, 2019, 37(3):13-18.
	MA Xiaoyan, REN Xiangliang, JIANG Weili, et al. Comparison of Growth and Reproduction of Black Nightshade(Solanum nigrumL.) Plants Emerging at Different Times[J]. Journal of Weed Science, 2019, 37(3):13-18.
[2]	冯宏祖, 王兰. 新疆南部棉区棉田杂草发生规律及综合防治[J]. 中国棉花, 2008,(4): 24-26.
	FENG Hongzu, WANG Lan. Occurrence and Comprehensive Control of Weeds in Cotton Fields in the Cotton Area of Southern Xinjiang[J]. China Cotton, 2008,(4): 24-26.
[3]	张强, 田英, 朱玉永, 等. 新疆兵团主要植棉区机采棉田杂草调查[J]. 中国棉花, 2020, 47(5): 13-16.
	ZHANG Qiang, TIAN Ying, ZHU Yuyong, et al. Investigation on Weeds in Machine Harvested Cotton Field in Main CottonPlanting Areas of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps[J]. China Cotton, 2020, 47(5): 13-16.
[4]	郝彦俊, 李广阔, 王剑, 等. 新疆棉田杂草调查[J]. 植物保护, 2003, 29(4): 42-44.
	HAO Yanjun, LI Guangkuo, WANG Jian, et al. Investigation of Weeds in Xinjiang Cotton Field[J]. Plant Protection, 2003, 29(4): 42-44.
[5]	冯琦. 石河子垦区滴灌棉田杂草的种类调查与防治[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学硕士学位论文, 2016.
	FENG Qi. The Occurrence and Controlling of Weeds in Cotton Field UnderDrip Irrigation in Shihezi[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2016.
[6]	强胜. 杂草学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2001: 22.
	QIANG Sheng. Weed Science[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2001: 22.
[7]	彭军, 马艳, 李香菊, 等. 外来入侵杂草黄顶菊与棉花的竞争作用[J]. 棉花学报, 2012, 24(3):272-278.
	PENG Jun, MA Yan, LI Xiangju, et al. Competition of an Alien Invasive Weed Flaveria bidentis with Cotton[J]. Cotton Science, 2012, 24(3): 272-278.
[8]	Barnett K A, Steckel L E. Giant ragweed(Ambrosia trifida)competition in cotton[J]. Weed Science, 2013, 61(4): 543-548. DOI URL
[9]	曹坳程, 朱文达, 颜冬冬, 等. 紫茎泽兰对棉花生长的影响及经济阈值[J]. 植物保护学报, 2013, 40(2):171-176.
	CAO Aocheng, ZHU Wenda, YAN Dongdong, et al. Effects of Eupatorium adenophorum on the growth of cotton and its economicthreshold[J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 2013, 40(2):171-176.
[10]	毛鹏志, 马小艳, 王少山, 等. 北疆棉田恶性杂草田旋花与棉花的竞争作用[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2020, 40(7):17-21.
	MAO Pengzhi, MA Xiaoyan, WANG Shaoshan, et al. Competition between Convolvulus arvensis and cotton in the cotton field ofNorthern Xinjiang[J]. China Plant Protection, 2020, 40(7): 17-21.
[11]	蔡晓虎. 扁秆藨草胁迫机采棉生长发育的研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学硕士学位论文, 2020.
	CAI Xiaohu. Study on Stress of Bolboschoenus planiculmis on the growth and development of Mechanical Harvest Cotton[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2020.
[12]	李文杰. 龙葵与棉花竞争及化学防除的研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学硕士学位论文, 2017.
	LI Wenjie. Study on the Competition and Chemical Control in Cotton and Solanum nigrum L.[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2017.
[13]	马冬梅, 魏建华, 杨青玲, 等. 棉田恶性杂草龙葵防控技术研究试验[J]. 新疆农业科技, 2014(6):41-42.
	MA Dongmei, WEI Jianhua, YANG Qingling, et al. Research and Experiment on prevention and control Technology of Malign weed Solanum nigrum L. in cotton field[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Science and Technology, 2014,(6):41-42.
[14]	潘俊峰, 万开元, 陶勇, 等. 基于农田养分管理的杂草生态防控策略[J]. 植物保护, 2014, 40(3):5-9,36.
	PAN Junfeng, WAN Kaiyuan, TAO Yong, et al. Ecological weed control strategy based on farmland nutrient management[J]. Plant Protection, 2014, 40(3):5-9,36.
[15]	王新玲, 马小艳, 姜伟丽, 等. 杂草与棉花的竞争作用[J]. 棉花学报, 2015, 27(5):474-480.
	WANG Xinling, MA Xiaoyan, JIANG Weili, et al. Review on Competition between Weeds and Cotton[J]. Cotton Science, 2015, 27(5):474-480.
[16]	李淑英, 朱加保, 路献勇, 等. 反枝苋对棉花的密度竞争作用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(2):286-298.
	LI Shuying, ZHU Jiabao, LU Xianyong, et al. The Influence of Redroot Pigweed(Amaranthus retroflexus) Density on Cotton(Gossypium hirsutum)[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(2):286-298.
[17]	冯建永, 庞民好, 刘颖超, 等. 棉田黄顶菊的经济阈值及竞争临界期[J]. 植物保护学报, 2009, 36(6): 561-566.
	FENG Jianyong, PANG Minhao, LUI Yingchao, et al. Economic threshold and critical period of competition of Flaveria bidentis(L.) Kuntze in the cotton fields[J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 2009, 36(6): 561-566.
[18]	唐淑荣, 魏守军, 郭瑞林, 等. 不同熟性棉花品种纤维品质特征分析与评价[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(10):1564-1577.
	TANG Shurong, WEI Shoujun, GUO Ruilin, et al. Evaluation and analysis of fiber quality characteristics of different maturity cottonvarieties[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2019, 27(10): 1564-1577.
[19]	袁志清. 世界各主要产棉国棉花品质分析及适纺性研究[D]. 石家庄: 河北科技大学硕士学位论文, 2013.
	YUAN Zhiqing. The Analysis of Cotton Properties and Spinnability Which is Producted in Main Cotton-Growing Countries[D]. Shijiazhuang: Hebei University of Science and Technology, 2013.
[20]	Kelly AB, Lawrence ES. Giant Ragweed( Ambrosia trifida ) Competition in Cotton[J]. Weed Science, 2013, 61(4):543-548. DOI URL
[21]	MARK LW, DON SM, BANKS JC, et al. Johnsongrass(Sorghum halepense) Density Effects on Cotton(Gossypium hirsutum) Harvest and Economic Value[J]. Weed Technology, 2002, 16(3):495-501. DOI URL
[22]	刘德立, Lovett J V, Johnson I R. 杂草对作物产量损失的经验模型[J]. 植物保护学报, 1991,(4):371-377.
	LUI Deli, Lovett J V, Johnson I R. Empirical Model of Weeds on Crop Yield Loss[J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 1991,(4):371-377.

龙葵密度（株/m²） Weed density （plant/m²）	株高 Plant height （cm）	茎粗 Stem thick （cm）	主茎节数 Number of main stems（Joint）
0	65.88±5.28^a	1.10±0.08^a	12.38±0.48^a
1	63.38±2.55^a	1.02±0.04^ab	12.11±0.99^a
4	51.58±6.81^b	0.97±0.18^ab	11.78±1.31^a
7	48.78±5.99^b	0.87±0.11^bc	10.22±1.40^b
10	41.67±3.48^c	0.78±0.15^c	10.33±1.56^b
15	43.00±2.36^c	0.73±0.12^c	8.89±0.75^c

龙葵密度（株/m²） Weed density （plant/m²）	株高 Plant height （cm）	茎粗 Stem thick （cm）	主茎节数 Number of main stems（Joint）
0	65.88±5.28^a	1.10±0.08^a	12.38±0.48^a
1	63.38±2.55^a	1.02±0.04^ab	12.11±0.99^a
4	51.58±6.81^b	0.97±0.18^ab	11.78±1.31^a
7	48.78±5.99^b	0.87±0.11^bc	10.22±1.40^b
10	41.67±3.48^c	0.78±0.15^c	10.33±1.56^b
15	43.00±2.36^c	0.73±0.12^c	8.89±0.75^c

龙葵密度（株/m²） Weed density （plant/m²）	产量 Yield （kg/hm²）	衣分 Lint percentage （%）	产量损失率 Yield loss rate （%）
0	5 681.43±286.10^a	44.83±0.69^ab
1	2 220.10±99.71^b	47.96±0.17^a	60.92
4	1 499.44±277.79^bc	44.43±0.93^ab	73.61
7	1 253.31±158.97^c	38.23±2.95^c	77.94
10	980.39±36.89^c	41.35±0.86^bc	82.74
15	0.00±0.00^d	0.00±0.00^d	100.00

龙葵密度（株/m²） Weed density （plant/m²）	产量 Yield （kg/hm²）	衣分 Lint percentage （%）	产量损失率 Yield loss rate （%）
0	5 681.43±286.10^a	44.83±0.69^ab
1	2 220.10±99.71^b	47.96±0.17^a	60.92
4	1 499.44±277.79^bc	44.43±0.93^ab	73.61
7	1 253.31±158.97^c	38.23±2.95^c	77.94
10	980.39±36.89^c	41.35±0.86^bc	82.74
15	0.00±0.00^d	0.00±0.00^d	100.00

龙葵密度（株/m²） Weed density （plant/m²）	马克隆值 Micronaire value	纤维长度 Fiber length （mm）	纤维整齐度 Fiber uniformity （%）	短纤维指数 Short fiber index （%）	纤维强度 Fiber strength （cN/tex）	纤维成熟度 Fiber maturity
0	4.49±0.04^ab	29.99±0.29^a	84.90±0.86^a	8.17±0.21^b	30.54±1.00^a	0.85±0.01^b
1	4.76±0.25^b	29.60±0.23^a	84.73±0.99^a	13.20±2.25^a	29.24±0.36^ab	0.87±0.00^a
4	5.08±0.04^a	29.64±0.58^a	86.17±0.54^a	10.43±0.69^b	29.58±0.68^ab	0.86±0.00^b
7	4.70±0.05^b	29.59±0.69^a	85.03±0.39^a	8.33±0.74^b	29.11±0.29^ab	0.86±0.01^b
10	5.07±0.02^a	30.10±0.39^a	85.86±0.46^a	8.00±1.13^b	28.28±0.60^b	0.87±0.00^a
15	—	—	—	—	—	—