Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2021, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (12): 2182-2190.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.12.004
• Crop Genetics and Breeding · Molecular Genetics . Cultivation Physiology · Storage and Preservation Processing • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHAO Long1(), LIU Xiangyu1, XU Jiang2(
), ZHU Li3, LI Yabin3, Mamat Ahmat4, LI Qun5, Alimu Abudilimu1
Received:
2020-10-08
Online:
2021-12-20
Published:
2021-12-31
Correspondence author:
XU Jiang
Supported by:
赵龙1(), 刘翔宇1, 徐江2(
), 朱莉3, 李玉斌3, 买买提·艾合买提4, 李群5, 阿力木·阿不迪力木1
通讯作者:
徐江
作者简介:
赵龙(1981-),男,新疆吐鲁番人,高级农艺师,硕士,研究方向为作物抗逆性,(E-mail) 592932851@sina.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
ZHAO Long, LIU Xiangyu, XU Jiang, ZHU Li, LI Yabin, Mamat Ahmat, LI Qun, Alimu Abudilimu. Performance and Drought Resisting Group Classification of 43 Maize Varieties in the Arid Area of Turpan, Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(12): 2182-2190.
赵龙, 刘翔宇, 徐江, 朱莉, 李玉斌, 买买提·艾合买提, 李群, 阿力木·阿不迪力木. 43个玉米品种在新疆吐鲁番旱区表现和抗旱类群划分[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(12): 2182-2190.
品种序号 Code | 品种名称 Cultivars name | 选育单位 Breeding units | 品种序号 Code | 品种名称 Cultivarsname | 选育单位 Breeding units |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | KX9384 | 德国KWS种子股份公司 | 23 | 先玉335 | 美国先锋良种国际有限公司 |
2 | KX3564 | 德国KWS种子股份公司 | 24 | 联创808 | 北京联创种业股份有限公司 |
3 | 泽玉402 | 吉林省宏泽现代农业有限公司 | 25 | 增玉1572 | 铁岭增玉种子技术研究有限公司 |
4 | 泽玉501 | 吉林省宏泽现代农业有限公司 | 26 | 裕丰303 | 北京联创种业股份有限公司 |
5 | 泽玉8911 | 吉林省宏泽现代农业有限公司 | 27 | 中科玉505 | 北京联创种业股份有限公司 |
6 | 泽尔沣99 | 吉林省宏泽现代农业有限公司 | 28 | 登海605 | 山东登海种业股份有限公司 |
7 | 辽单565 | 辽宁省农业科学院玉米研究所 | 29 | 登海618 | 山东登海种业股份有限公司 |
8 | 辽单575 | 辽宁省农业科学院玉米研究所 | 30 | 郑单958 | 河南省农业科学院粮食作物研究所 |
9 | 辽单585 | 辽宁省农业科学院玉米研究所 | 31 | 郑单538 | 河南省农业科学院粮食作物研究所 |
10 | 辽单586 | 辽宁省农业科学院玉米研究所 | 32 | 郑单1002 | 河南省农业科学院粮食作物研究所 |
11 | 辽单1211 | 辽宁省农业科学院玉米研究所 | 33 | 秋乐368 | 河南秋乐种业科技股份有限公司 |
12 | 辽单145 | 辽宁省农业科学院玉米研究所 | 34 | 陕单628 | 西北农林科技大学 |
13 | 农华101 | 北京金色农华种业科技有限公司 | 35 | 陕单609 | 西北农林科技大学 |
14 | 农华106 | 北京金色农华种业科技有限公司 | 36 | 陕单620 | 西北农林科技大学 |
15 | 锦华150 | 北京金色农华种业科技有限公司 | 37 | 陕单650 | 西北农林科技大学 |
16 | 农华205 | 北京金色农华种业科技有限公司 | 38 | 吉单101 | 吉林省农业科学院 |
17 | 农华127 | 北京金色农华种业科技有限公司 | 39 | 吉单180 | 吉林省农业科学院 |
18 | 增玉1317 | 北京金色农华种业科技有限公司 | 40 | 掖单13号 | 山东省莱州市农业科学院 |
19 | 农华816 | 北京金色农华种业科技有限公司 | 41 | 四单8号 | 吉林省四平地区农业研究所 |
20 | 农大108 | 中国农业大学 | 42 | 丹玉13号 | 辽宁省丹东市农科所 |
21 | 金通152 | 北京金色农华种业科技有限公司 | 43 | 英粒子 | 吉林农家种 |
22 | MC670 | 北京金色农华种业科技有限公司 |
Table 1 Information of 43 maize cultivars
品种序号 Code | 品种名称 Cultivars name | 选育单位 Breeding units | 品种序号 Code | 品种名称 Cultivarsname | 选育单位 Breeding units |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | KX9384 | 德国KWS种子股份公司 | 23 | 先玉335 | 美国先锋良种国际有限公司 |
2 | KX3564 | 德国KWS种子股份公司 | 24 | 联创808 | 北京联创种业股份有限公司 |
3 | 泽玉402 | 吉林省宏泽现代农业有限公司 | 25 | 增玉1572 | 铁岭增玉种子技术研究有限公司 |
4 | 泽玉501 | 吉林省宏泽现代农业有限公司 | 26 | 裕丰303 | 北京联创种业股份有限公司 |
5 | 泽玉8911 | 吉林省宏泽现代农业有限公司 | 27 | 中科玉505 | 北京联创种业股份有限公司 |
6 | 泽尔沣99 | 吉林省宏泽现代农业有限公司 | 28 | 登海605 | 山东登海种业股份有限公司 |
7 | 辽单565 | 辽宁省农业科学院玉米研究所 | 29 | 登海618 | 山东登海种业股份有限公司 |
8 | 辽单575 | 辽宁省农业科学院玉米研究所 | 30 | 郑单958 | 河南省农业科学院粮食作物研究所 |
9 | 辽单585 | 辽宁省农业科学院玉米研究所 | 31 | 郑单538 | 河南省农业科学院粮食作物研究所 |
10 | 辽单586 | 辽宁省农业科学院玉米研究所 | 32 | 郑单1002 | 河南省农业科学院粮食作物研究所 |
11 | 辽单1211 | 辽宁省农业科学院玉米研究所 | 33 | 秋乐368 | 河南秋乐种业科技股份有限公司 |
12 | 辽单145 | 辽宁省农业科学院玉米研究所 | 34 | 陕单628 | 西北农林科技大学 |
13 | 农华101 | 北京金色农华种业科技有限公司 | 35 | 陕单609 | 西北农林科技大学 |
14 | 农华106 | 北京金色农华种业科技有限公司 | 36 | 陕单620 | 西北农林科技大学 |
15 | 锦华150 | 北京金色农华种业科技有限公司 | 37 | 陕单650 | 西北农林科技大学 |
16 | 农华205 | 北京金色农华种业科技有限公司 | 38 | 吉单101 | 吉林省农业科学院 |
17 | 农华127 | 北京金色农华种业科技有限公司 | 39 | 吉单180 | 吉林省农业科学院 |
18 | 增玉1317 | 北京金色农华种业科技有限公司 | 40 | 掖单13号 | 山东省莱州市农业科学院 |
19 | 农华816 | 北京金色农华种业科技有限公司 | 41 | 四单8号 | 吉林省四平地区农业研究所 |
20 | 农大108 | 中国农业大学 | 42 | 丹玉13号 | 辽宁省丹东市农科所 |
21 | 金通152 | 北京金色农华种业科技有限公司 | 43 | 英粒子 | 吉林农家种 |
22 | MC670 | 北京金色农华种业科技有限公司 |
X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 | X11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x1 | 1 | ||||||||||
x2 | 0.661** | 1 | |||||||||
x3 | 0.33* | 0.556** | 1 | ||||||||
x4 | 0.466** | 0.351* | 0.174 | 1 | |||||||
x5 | 0.315* | 0.140 | 0.063 | 0.250 | 1 | ||||||
x6 | 0.297* | 0.139 | 0.269* | 0.467** | 0.211 | 1 | |||||
x7 | 0.53** | 0.439** | 0.294* | 0.421** | 0.624** | 0.513** | 1 | ||||
x8 | 0.425** | 0.253 | 0.338* | 0.33* | 0.264* | 0.586** | 0.449** | 1 | |||
x9 | 0.193 | 0.153 | 0.272* | 0.401** | 0.063 | 0.415** | 0.327* | 0.44** | 1 | ||
x10 | 0.539** | 0.367** | 0.335* | 0.751** | 0.285* | 0.66** | 0.521** | 0.866** | 0.506** | 1 | |
x11 | 0.638** | 0.569** | 0.313* | 0.51** | 0.286* | 0.299* | 0.657** | 0.384** | 0.308* | 0.527** | 1 |
x12 | 0.724** | 0.609** | 0.341* | 0.48** | 0.336* | 0.3* | 0.677* | 0.478** | 0.363** | 0.572** | 0.908** |
Table 2 The correlation analysis data
X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 | X11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x1 | 1 | ||||||||||
x2 | 0.661** | 1 | |||||||||
x3 | 0.33* | 0.556** | 1 | ||||||||
x4 | 0.466** | 0.351* | 0.174 | 1 | |||||||
x5 | 0.315* | 0.140 | 0.063 | 0.250 | 1 | ||||||
x6 | 0.297* | 0.139 | 0.269* | 0.467** | 0.211 | 1 | |||||
x7 | 0.53** | 0.439** | 0.294* | 0.421** | 0.624** | 0.513** | 1 | ||||
x8 | 0.425** | 0.253 | 0.338* | 0.33* | 0.264* | 0.586** | 0.449** | 1 | |||
x9 | 0.193 | 0.153 | 0.272* | 0.401** | 0.063 | 0.415** | 0.327* | 0.44** | 1 | ||
x10 | 0.539** | 0.367** | 0.335* | 0.751** | 0.285* | 0.66** | 0.521** | 0.866** | 0.506** | 1 | |
x11 | 0.638** | 0.569** | 0.313* | 0.51** | 0.286* | 0.299* | 0.657** | 0.384** | 0.308* | 0.527** | 1 |
x12 | 0.724** | 0.609** | 0.341* | 0.48** | 0.336* | 0.3* | 0.677* | 0.478** | 0.363** | 0.572** | 0.908** |
性状 Character | F1 | F2 | F3 | 共同度 Communalities (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
株高 Plant height | 0.734 | 0.226 | 0.341 | 0.706 |
穗位高 Ear position height | 0.897 | 0.067 | 0.029 | 0.811 |
茎粗 Stem diameter | 0.640 | 0.297 | -0.284 | 0.578 |
单株穗数 The number of ears per plant | 0.312 | 0.582 | 0.280 | 0.515 |
穗行数 Rows per ear | 0.055 | 0.104 | 0.856 | 0.747 |
穗长 Ear length | 0.039 | 0.803 | 0.192 | 0.683 |
穗粗 Ear diameter | 0.424 | 0.368 | 0.678 | 0.776 |
穗粒重 Kernel weight per ear | 0.215 | 0.791 | 0.155 | 0.696 |
百粒重 100-kernels weight | 0.151 | 0.708 | -0.077 | 0.530 |
籽粒产量 Grain yield | 0.318 | 0.858 | 0.227 | 0.889 |
茎叶鲜重 Weight of fresh leaves and stems | 0.726 | 0.255 | 0.412 | 0.762 |
茎叶干重 Weight of dry leaves and stems | 0.752 | 0.294 | 0.420 | 0.829 |
初始特征值 Eigenvalue | 5.777 | 1.555 | 1.190 | |
贡献率 Contribution rate(%) | 48.14 | 12.96 | 9.92 | |
累积贡献率 The cumulative contribution(%) | 48.14 | 61.1 | 71.02 |
Table 3 The principal component analysis
性状 Character | F1 | F2 | F3 | 共同度 Communalities (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
株高 Plant height | 0.734 | 0.226 | 0.341 | 0.706 |
穗位高 Ear position height | 0.897 | 0.067 | 0.029 | 0.811 |
茎粗 Stem diameter | 0.640 | 0.297 | -0.284 | 0.578 |
单株穗数 The number of ears per plant | 0.312 | 0.582 | 0.280 | 0.515 |
穗行数 Rows per ear | 0.055 | 0.104 | 0.856 | 0.747 |
穗长 Ear length | 0.039 | 0.803 | 0.192 | 0.683 |
穗粗 Ear diameter | 0.424 | 0.368 | 0.678 | 0.776 |
穗粒重 Kernel weight per ear | 0.215 | 0.791 | 0.155 | 0.696 |
百粒重 100-kernels weight | 0.151 | 0.708 | -0.077 | 0.530 |
籽粒产量 Grain yield | 0.318 | 0.858 | 0.227 | 0.889 |
茎叶鲜重 Weight of fresh leaves and stems | 0.726 | 0.255 | 0.412 | 0.762 |
茎叶干重 Weight of dry leaves and stems | 0.752 | 0.294 | 0.420 | 0.829 |
初始特征值 Eigenvalue | 5.777 | 1.555 | 1.190 | |
贡献率 Contribution rate(%) | 48.14 | 12.96 | 9.92 | |
累积贡献率 The cumulative contribution(%) | 48.14 | 61.1 | 71.02 |
统计量 Statistic | 观测值 Observed value | F值 F value | 假设df Hypotheticaldf | 误差 df Error df | Pr>F |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pillai's Trace | 0.999 | 726.753 | 2.000 | 1.000 | 0.026 |
Wilksi's Trace | 0.001 | 726.753 | 2.000 | 1.000 | 0.026 |
Hotelling Trace | 1 453.506 | 726.753 | 2.000 | 1.000 | 0.026 |
Roy's Greatest Root | 1 453.506 | 726.753 | 2.000 | 1.000 | 0.026 |
Table 4 Test of main indicators among different classes
统计量 Statistic | 观测值 Observed value | F值 F value | 假设df Hypotheticaldf | 误差 df Error df | Pr>F |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pillai's Trace | 0.999 | 726.753 | 2.000 | 1.000 | 0.026 |
Wilksi's Trace | 0.001 | 726.753 | 2.000 | 1.000 | 0.026 |
Hotelling Trace | 1 453.506 | 726.753 | 2.000 | 1.000 | 0.026 |
Roy's Greatest Root | 1 453.506 | 726.753 | 2.000 | 1.000 | 0.026 |
类别 Categories | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 穗位高 Earposition height(cm) | 茎粗 Stemdiameter (mm) | 单株穗数 The number of ears perplant (个) | 穗长 Ear length (cm) | 穗茎粗 Ear diameter (mm) | 穗粒重 Kernel weight perear(kg) | 百粒重 100-kernels weight(g) | 籽粒产量 Grain yield (t/hm2) | 鲜重 Weight of fresh leaves and stems(kg) | 干重 Weight of dry leaves and stems(kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 1.9±0.09 | 0.77±0.1 | 2.36±0.11 | 1.81±0.39 | 23.71±3.82 | 41±0.56 | 0.24±0.04 | 29.14±1.91 | 5.16±0.92 | 0.58±0.07 | 0.24±0.05 |
Ⅱ | 2.29±0.04 | 1.08±0.04 | 2.85±0.24 | 2.69±0.29 | 29.6±5.4 | 49.28±2.31 | 0.34±0.07 | 32.23±0.6 | 10.88±1.78 | 1.13±0.06 | 0.45±0.03 |
Ⅲ | 2.16±0.03 | 0.88±0.07 | 2.52±0.24 | 2.52±0.07 | 30.73±0.69 | 46.79±1.59 | 0.35±0.02 | 32.87±0.84 | 10.66±0.4 | 0.92±0.11 | 0.36±0.05 |
Ⅳ | 2.16±0.07 | 0.91±0.08 | 2.56±0.13 | 2.3±0.15 | 27.37±1.78 | 47.03±1.74 | 0.3±0.03 | 31.36±1.97 | 8.19±0.85 | 0.98±0.11 | 0.39±0.03 |
Ⅴ | 2.02±0.09 | 0.8±0.06 | 2.43±0.17 | 2.36±0.19 | 28.42±2.02 | 46.11±1.62 | 0.29±0.03 | 31.64±1.76 | 8.15±1.07 | 0.8±0.09 | 0.31±0.03 |
Table 5 Average and variation range of grain yield and major index quality of each class’s cultivars
类别 Categories | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 穗位高 Earposition height(cm) | 茎粗 Stemdiameter (mm) | 单株穗数 The number of ears perplant (个) | 穗长 Ear length (cm) | 穗茎粗 Ear diameter (mm) | 穗粒重 Kernel weight perear(kg) | 百粒重 100-kernels weight(g) | 籽粒产量 Grain yield (t/hm2) | 鲜重 Weight of fresh leaves and stems(kg) | 干重 Weight of dry leaves and stems(kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 1.9±0.09 | 0.77±0.1 | 2.36±0.11 | 1.81±0.39 | 23.71±3.82 | 41±0.56 | 0.24±0.04 | 29.14±1.91 | 5.16±0.92 | 0.58±0.07 | 0.24±0.05 |
Ⅱ | 2.29±0.04 | 1.08±0.04 | 2.85±0.24 | 2.69±0.29 | 29.6±5.4 | 49.28±2.31 | 0.34±0.07 | 32.23±0.6 | 10.88±1.78 | 1.13±0.06 | 0.45±0.03 |
Ⅲ | 2.16±0.03 | 0.88±0.07 | 2.52±0.24 | 2.52±0.07 | 30.73±0.69 | 46.79±1.59 | 0.35±0.02 | 32.87±0.84 | 10.66±0.4 | 0.92±0.11 | 0.36±0.05 |
Ⅳ | 2.16±0.07 | 0.91±0.08 | 2.56±0.13 | 2.3±0.15 | 27.37±1.78 | 47.03±1.74 | 0.3±0.03 | 31.36±1.97 | 8.19±0.85 | 0.98±0.11 | 0.39±0.03 |
Ⅴ | 2.02±0.09 | 0.8±0.06 | 2.43±0.17 | 2.36±0.19 | 28.42±2.02 | 46.11±1.62 | 0.29±0.03 | 31.64±1.76 | 8.15±1.07 | 0.8±0.09 | 0.31±0.03 |
品种名称 Cultivar name | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 穗位高 Ear position height(cm) | 茎粗 Stem diameter (mm) | 单株穗数 The number of ears per plant(个) | 穗行数 Rows per ear (行) | 穗长 Ear length (cm) | 穗粗 Ear length (mm) | 穗粒重 Kernel weight per ear(kg) | 百粒重 100-kernels weight(g) | 籽粒产量 Grain yield (t/hm2) | 鲜重 Weight of fresh leaves and stems (kg) | 干重 Weight of dry leaves and stems (kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
辽单145 Liaodan 145 | 2.29 | 1.11 | 2.81 | 2.60 | 16.22 | 34.13 | 51.92 | 0.42 | 32.71 | 12.94 | 1.14 | 0.49 |
郑单958 Zengdan 958 | 2.33 | 1.03 | 2.63 | 3.01 | 15.63 | 23.63 | 47.64 | 0.27 | 31.56 | 9.90 | 1.19 | 0.45 |
辽单1211 Liaodan 1211 | 2.24 | 1.09 | 3.11 | 2.46 | 15.44 | 31.04 | 48.27 | 0.33 | 32.40 | 9.79 | 1.07 | 0.42 |
Table 6 Index values of the class Ⅱ
品种名称 Cultivar name | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 穗位高 Ear position height(cm) | 茎粗 Stem diameter (mm) | 单株穗数 The number of ears per plant(个) | 穗行数 Rows per ear (行) | 穗长 Ear length (cm) | 穗粗 Ear length (mm) | 穗粒重 Kernel weight per ear(kg) | 百粒重 100-kernels weight(g) | 籽粒产量 Grain yield (t/hm2) | 鲜重 Weight of fresh leaves and stems (kg) | 干重 Weight of dry leaves and stems (kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
辽单145 Liaodan 145 | 2.29 | 1.11 | 2.81 | 2.60 | 16.22 | 34.13 | 51.92 | 0.42 | 32.71 | 12.94 | 1.14 | 0.49 |
郑单958 Zengdan 958 | 2.33 | 1.03 | 2.63 | 3.01 | 15.63 | 23.63 | 47.64 | 0.27 | 31.56 | 9.90 | 1.19 | 0.45 |
辽单1211 Liaodan 1211 | 2.24 | 1.09 | 3.11 | 2.46 | 15.44 | 31.04 | 48.27 | 0.33 | 32.40 | 9.79 | 1.07 | 0.42 |
[1] | 王文静, 延军平, 刘永林. 新疆旱涝气候的南北差异性分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2016,33(3):609-618. |
WANG Wenjing, YAN Junping, LIU Yongling. Difference of Drought/Flod Disasters in Xinjiang[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2016,33(3):609-618. | |
[2] | 杨杰, 雷志刚, 梁晓玲, 等. 新疆玉米新自交系耐旱性鉴定与评价[J]. 西北农业学报, 2011,20(12):66-71. |
YANG Jie, LEI Zhigang, LIANG Xiaoling, et al. Evaluation for Drought Tolerance of New Maize Inbred Lines in Xinjiang[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica , 2011,20(12):66-71. | |
[3] | 王鹏涛. 西北地区干旱灾害时空统计规律与风险管理研究[D]. 西安:陕西师范大学, 2018. |
WANG Pengtao. Research on spatial and temporal statistics and risk management of drought disasters in northwest China[D]. Xian: Shanxi Normal University, 2018. | |
[4] | 中国天气网. 新疆气候趋暖湿,干旱气候背景不改变[DB/OL]. http://www.weather.com.cn/xinjiang/xjsy/tqyw/3264037.shtml,2019-12-4 |
Chinaweathernews. The climate in xinjiang is warmer and wetter, while the arid climate background remains unchanged[DB/OL].http://www.weather.com.cn/xinjiang/xjsy/tqyw/3264037.shtml,2019-12-4. | |
[5] | 董朝阳, 杨晓光, 杨婕, 等. 中国北方地区春玉米干旱的时间演变特征和空间分布规律[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013,46(20):4234-4245. |
DONG Chaoyang, YANG Xiaoguang, YANG Jie, et al. The Temporal Variation Characteristics and Spatial Distribution Laws of Drought of Spring Maize in Northern China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013,46(20):4234-4245. | |
[6] | 唐怀君, 孙宝成, 周芳芝, 等. 玉米抗旱性状的遗传力分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2015,52(11):2011-2015. |
TANG Huaijun, SUN Baocheng, ZHOU Fangzhi, et al. Analysis of the hereditability of maize drought Resistance characteristics[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2015,52(11):2011-2015. | |
[7] | 王君, 籍秀梅, 于海秋, 等. 玉米植株抗旱性状的杂种优势分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2006,14(5):9-14. |
WANG Jun, JI Xiumei, YU Haiqiu, et al. Analysis on heterosis of plant drought-resistant traits of maize[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2006,14(5):9-14. | |
[8] | 张中保, 卢敏, 李会勇, 等. 玉米干旱诱导表达基因ZmCKS2的克隆与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2010,36(6):945-952. |
ZHANG Zhongbao, LU Ming, LI Huiyong, et al. Isolation and expression analysis of a drought-Induced Gene“ZmCKS2”inMaize(Zea mays L.)[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010,36(6):945-952. | |
[9] | Hz A, Zhen Y B, Ww A, et al. Transcriptome analysis of maize inbred lines differing in drought tolerance provides novel insights into the molecular mechanisms of drought responses in roots[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2020,149(1):11-26. |
[10] | 郭相平, 刘展鹏, 王青梅, 等. 利用投影寻踪分类模型评价玉米旱后生理补偿效应[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2007,25(6):22-25. |
GUO Xiangping, LIU Zhanpeng, WANG Qingmei, et al. Comprehensive evaluation on compensatory effects of rewatering after PEG stress based on PPC-RAGA model[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2007,25(6):22-25. | |
[11] | 邵瑞鑫, 李蕾蕾, 郑会芳, 等. 外源一氧化氮对干旱胁迫下玉米幼苗光合作用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学2016, 49(2):251-259. |
SHA0 Ruixin, LI Leilei, ZHENG Huifang, et al. Efects of exogenous nitric oxide on photosynjournal of maize seedlings under drought stress[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016,49(2):251-259. | |
[12] | 李春燕. 探究玉米节水抗旱栽培技术措施[J]. 中国农业文摘-农业工程, 2020,32(1):80-81. |
LI Chunyang . The technical measures of water-saving and drought-resistant cultivation of maize[J]. Agricultural Science and Engineering in China, 2020,32(1):80-81. | |
[13] | 牟颖熙, 刘艳, 王国英, 等. 一个玉米旱敏感突变体的遗传分析与基因定位[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2014,15(3):615-619. |
MU Yingxi, LIU Yang, WANG Guoying, et al. Genetic analysis and gene mapping of a maize drought sensitive mutant[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2014,15(3):615-619. | |
[14] | Gaffney J, Schussler J, et al. Industry-Scale evaluation of maize hybrids selected for increased yield in drought-stress conditions of the US Corn Belt[J]. Crop Science, 2015,55(4):1608-1613. |
[15] | Mark C, Carla G, Roger L, et al. Breeding drought-tolerant maize hybrids for the US corn-belt: discovery to product[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2014,21(3):1314-1328. |
[16] | 梁晓玲, 王业建, 杨杰, 等. 玉米耐旱遗传育种研究及分子育种策略[J]. 玉米科学, 2018,26(3):1-5. |
LIANG Xiaoling, WANG Yejiang, YANG Jie, et al. Genetics and breeding for drought tolerance in maize[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2018,26(3):1-5 . | |
[17] | 徐莹莹, 刘玉涛, 高盼, 等. 吐丝期干旱胁迫对玉米生长及产量的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2017,(4):16-20. |
XU Yingying, LIU Yutao, GAO Pan, et al. Effects of drought stress on growth and yield of maize during silking period[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Science, 2017,(4):16-20 . | |
[18] | 赵霞, 刘诗慧, 张国方, 等. 16个玉米杂交种的抗旱性评价[J]. 河南农业科学, 2017,46(12):24-28. |
ZHAO Xia, LIU Shihui, ZHANG Guofang, et al. Evaluation on drought tolerance of 16 maize hybrids[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2017,46(12):24-28. | |
[19] | 岳海旺, 卜俊周, 陈淑萍, 等. 冀中南地区不同玉米品种抗旱性比较研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 2017,29(3):22-27. |
YUE Haiwang, BU Junzhou, CHEN Shuping, et al. Comparative research on drought resistance of diferent maizeVarieties in central and southern regions of Hebei province[J] Acta Agricuhurae Jiangxi, 2017,29(3):22-27. | |
[20] | 韩登旭, 杨杰, 邵红雨, 等. 中国骨干玉米自交系抗旱性分析与评价[J]. 西北植物学报, 2012,32(8):1648-1653. |
HAN Dengxu, YANG Jie, SHAO Hongyu, et al. Analysis and evaluation of drought resistanceof elite maize inbred lines in China[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2012,32(8):1648-1653. | |
[21] | 阿依加马力·克然木, 努尔巴衣·阿布都沙力克. 近52年新疆吐鲁番市气温及降水量变化特征分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2014,28(12):45-50. |
Ayijiamali K, Nuerbayi A. Analysis of temperature and rainfall changes in recent 52 years in Turpan city, Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2014,28(12):45-50. | |
[22] | 阿米娜·帕塔尔. 吐鲁番市气候特点以及对农业生态的影响[J]. 新农业, 2019,(21):24-25. |
Amina Partaer. The climatic characteristics of Turpan city and its influence on agricultural ecology[J]. Xin Nongye, 2019,(21):24-25. | |
[23] | 梁静. 新疆水肥一体化技术应用现状与发展对策[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2015,38(1):38-40. |
LIANG Jing. Application status and development countermeasures of integrated technology of water fertilizer in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Farmland Reclamation Science & Technology, 2015,38(1):38-40. | |
[24] | 唐启义. DPS数据处理系统[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013. |
TANG Qiyi. Data Processing System [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2013. | |
[25] | 卢纹岱, 朱红兵 . SPSS统计分析[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2015. |
LU Wendai, ZHU Hongbing. SPSS Statistical Analysis[M]. Beijing:Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2015. | |
[26] | Supriya C, Manjit P, Dhan P, Sheikh F A, et al. Singh. Ancestry informative markers derived from discriminant analysis of principal components provide important insights into the composition of crossbred cattle[J]. Genomics, 2020,112(2):1726-1733. |
[27] | Stolerman L M, Getz M, Smith S, et al. Stability analysis of a bulk-surface reaction model for membrane protein clustering[J]. Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2020,82(2):30 |
[28] | 刘翔宇, 刘祖昕, 加帕尔, 等. 基于主成分与灰色关联分析的甜高粱品种综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2016,53(1):99-107. |
LIU Xiangyu, LIU Zhuxin, Jiapar Slayiding, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of sweet sorghum varieties based on principal component analysis and gray relational grade analysis[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2016,53(1):99-107. | |
[29] | 王正新, 党耀国, 曹明霞. 基于灰熵优化的加权灰色关联度[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2010,32(4):774-776, 783. |
WANG Zhengxin, DANG Yaoguo, CAO Mingxia. Weighted degree of grey incidence based on optimized entropy[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010,32(4):774-776, 783. | |
[30] | 任红松, 陈宝峰, 黄润. 基于熵权的改进灰色关联度分析在县域经济竞争力评价中的应用[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2013,41(34):13429-13430,13432 |
REN Hongsong, CHEN Baofeng, HUANG Rong. The Application of The Improved Grey Relational Analysis Based on Entropy Weight in the Evaluation of County Economic Competitiveness[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2013,41(34):13429-13430,13432. | |
[31] | 刘翔宇, 赵龙, 巴哈尔古丽·先木西, 等. 新疆陆地棉种质资源的综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017,50(24):4679-4691. |
LIU Xiangyu, ZHAO Long, Bahargul Xianmuxi, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of germplasm resources of upland cotton in Xinjiang[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017,50(24):4679-4691. | |
[32] | Ramdath Lu, Mahara j, et al. Proximate Analysis and Nutritional Evaluation of Twenty Canadian Lentils by Principal Component and Cluster Analyses[J]. Foods, 2020,9(2):175. |
[33] | 牟书靓, 牛海龙, 李伟堂, 等. 花生种质资源农艺性状主成分及聚类分析[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2019,(6):1-5. |
MU Shuliang, NIU Hailong, LI Weitang, et al. Principal components and cluster analysis of agronomic characters of peanut germplasm resources[J]. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, 2019,(6):1-5. | |
[34] | 张振良, 黄小兰, 薛林, 等. 基于主成分分析和聚类分析的甜糯玉米新组合育种潜力评价[J]. 江西农业学报, 2019,31(2):19-25. |
ZHANG Zhenliang, HUANG Xiaolang, XUE Lin, et al. Evaluation of new combination breeding potential of sweet waxy maize based on principal component analysis and cluster analysis[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2019,31(2):19-25. | |
[35] | 王业建, 郗浩江, 李铭东, 等. 我国47份主要玉米自交系耐旱性分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2018,(4):10-16. |
WANG Yejian, XI Haojiang, LI Mingdong, et al. Drought tolerance evaluation of 47 main maize inbred lines in China[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2018(4):10-16. | |
[36] | 李洪, 王瑞军, 王彧超, 等. 不同玉米品种在晋北地区的适应性评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018,34(20):15-20. |
LI Hong, WANG Ruijun, WANG Yuchao, YANG Zhibin, et al, Adaptability evaluation of maize varieties in northern Shanxi[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018,34(20):15-20. |
[1] | ZENG Wanying, GENG Hongwei, CHENG Yukun, LI Sizhong, QIAN Songting, GAO Weishi, ZHANG Liming. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance during the rapid growth stage of sugar beet cultivars [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2140-2151. |
[2] | LI Jinyao, XU Guiqing, WANG Lisheng, LU Ping, SHI Dongfang, ZHENG Weihua. Study on the effect of N fertilization on drought resistance of Calligonum caput-medusae seedlings [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2330-2340. |
[3] | YANG Minghua, LIU Qiang, FENG Guorui, LIAO Biyong, Dawulai Jiekeshan, PENG Yuncheng, Buayixiamu Namanti, CHEN Yanping. Study on suitable harvesting time and grain water content of fresh waxy maize [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1626-1630. |
[4] | WANG Yizhao, YANG Qizhi, LIU Yuxiu, Alayi Nurkamali, Vladimir Shvidchenko, ZHANG Zhengmao. Evaluation of drought resistance of different Kazakhstan spring wheat at seeding stage under PEG-6000 stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1352-1360. |
[5] | ZHANG Lei, YAO Mengyao, LIU Zhigang, LI Juan, YANG Yang, CAI Darun, CHEN Guo, LI Bo, LI Xiaorong, CHEN Xunji, ZHAI Yunlong. Research of maize yield estimation based on unmanned aerial vehicle multispectral NDVI [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 845-851. |
[6] | GAO Mutian, XIAO Yanmei, LIAO Zhijie, HUANG Cheng. Comprehensive evaluation of kernel and quality traits in maize-teosinte introgression line population [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 885-891. |
[7] | MENG Hanying, GUO Dandan, HE Wanjie, ZHANG Weiwei, ZHANG Jianping, CHEN Jing. Effects of different feeding time of Monolepta Signata on the composition and content of volatile in maize leaves [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 421-433. |
[8] | LIAO Caiyun, MA Gui, ZHOU Yanyan, DING Jiafu, ZHOU Yue, BI Kexin, SUN Rong, LI Youhua. Effects of combined exposure of zinc and different microplastics on seed germination and growth of maize [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(11): 2713-2721. |
[9] | LI Chi, CHEN Gang, YANG Jige, YANG Tingrui, ZHAO Jinghua, MA Mingjie. Stu dy on leaf information collection of spring maize under different water nitrogen treatment conditions based on ground-based multispectrum [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(10): 2374-2387. |
[10] | CHEN Zhanhui, SUN Qiang, REN Jiaojiao, HUANG Bowen, XU Jiabo, YANG Jie, WU Penghao. QTL mapping and genomic selection of maize leaf width [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1606-1613. |
[11] | SHAO Panxia, ZHAO Zhun, SHAO Wukui, HAO Xiaoyan, GAO Shengqi, LI Jianping, HU Wenran, HUANG Quansheng. Expression analysis of ZmCDPK22 gene in maize under drought stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1372-1378. |
[12] | LU Yantian, SANG Zhiqin, XU Can, ZHANG Li, XIA Chunlan, WANG Youde, LI Wei, CHEN Shubin. Evolution of main characters of maize varieties approved in Xinjiang and Ningxia over the years and analysis of the current situation of variety approval [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1379-1388. |
[13] | YANG Minghua, LIU Qiang, LIAO Biyong, PEN Yuncheng, Buayxam Namat, Dawulai Jiekeshan. Comprehensive evaluation of lodging resistance of NCII maize combinations [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 832-840. |
[14] | ZHOU Guangwei, HAN Dengxu, ZHU Qi, ZHANG Shaomin. Screening of spring maize genotypes tolerant to low-phosphorus and their phosphorus efficiency in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 847-856. |
[15] | Chen Guo, Hao Xiaoyan, Gao Shengqi, Hu Wenran, Zhao Zhun, Huang Quansheng. Genome-wide identification of the maize calcium-dependent protein kinase and drought expression analysis of the CDPK gene family in maize [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 857-864. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 96
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 131
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||