不同有机肥对土壤肥力及鲜食玉米农艺性状、产量与品质的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.03.011

新疆农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (3): 619-626.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.03.011

• 作物遗传育种·耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇下一篇

不同有机肥对土壤肥力及鲜食玉米农艺性状、产量与品质的影响

郝曦煜¹^,²(), 张仲鹃¹^,², 张斯文³^,⁴, 张瑾⁵, 郑春秀⁶, 吴世凯⁷, 张永久¹()

1.黑龙江飞鹤乳业有限公司,北京 100015
2.黑龙江北纬四十七绿色有机食品有限公司,黑龙江齐齐哈尔 161500
3.黑龙江北纬四十七绿色有机农场有限公司,黑龙江齐齐哈尔 161500
4.黑龙江省依安县双阳镇乡村经济发展服务中心,黑龙江齐齐哈尔 161500
5.黑龙江省依安县解放乡乡村经济发展服务中心,黑龙江齐齐哈尔 161500
6.黑龙江省依安县阳春乡人民政府,黑龙江齐齐哈尔 161500
7.黑龙江省依安县三兴镇人民政府,黑龙江齐齐哈尔 161500

收稿日期:2024-09-10 出版日期:2025-03-20 发布日期:2025-05-14
通信作者: 张永久(1973-),男,黑龙江哈尔滨人,中级工程师,研究方向为农牧业技术开发与应用,(E-mail) zhangyongjiu@feihe.com
作者简介:郝曦煜(1990-),男,辽宁铁岭人,副研究员,硕士,研究方向为作物育种与栽培,(E-mail) haoxiyu1990@foxmail.com
基金资助:
科技部重点研发计划课题(2022YFC2010104)

Selection and comprehensive evaluation of nitrogen-efficient foxtail millet varieties based on principal component analysis

HAO Xiyu¹^,²(), LIU Tingting¹^,², WANG Hui³^,⁴, LENG Jingwen⁵, GONG Shihang⁶, LIU Wei⁷

1. Heilongjiang Feihe Dairy Co., Ltd., Beijing 10015, China
2. Heilongjiang Beiwei 47 Green Or-ganic Food Co., Ltd., Qiqihar Heilongjiang 161500, China
3. Heilongjiang Beiwei 47 Green Organic Farm Co., Ltd., Qiqihar Heilongjiang 161500, China
4. Rural Economic Development Service Center of Shuangy-ang Town in Yian County of Heilongjiang Province, Qiqihar Heilongjiang 161500, China
5. Rural Economic Development Service Center of Jiefang Town in Yian County of Heilongjiang Province, Qiqihar Heilongjiang 161500, China
6. Peoples Government of Yangchun Town in Yian County of Heilongjiang Province, Qiqihar Heilongjiang 161500, China
7. People's Government of Sanxing Town in Yian County of Heilongjiang Prov-ince, Qiqihar Heilongjiang 161500, China

Received:2024-09-10 Published:2025-03-20 Online:2025-05-14
Supported by:
Project of China Agriculture Research System(CARS-06)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】探索不同有机肥对鲜食玉米的影响,确定适宜不同种植需求的有机肥料。【方法】以2种鲜食玉米为材料,以5种不同类型的有机肥为处理,通过隶属函数法综合评价土壤肥力、农艺性状、产量和品质。【结果】施用2年不同有机肥土壤速效钾含量缓慢上升后下降,其他营养成分逐年上升;氨基酸有机肥提升了最多的有机质含量(0.32%),其次为微生物有机肥;化肥提升了最多的碱解氮(4.75 mg/kg)、有效磷(2.24 mg/kg)、速效钾(13.55 mg/kg)、全氮(119.72 mg/kg)、全磷(33.28 mg/kg)和全钾(1 384.18 mg/kg)含量,其次为氨基酸有机肥。不同有机肥对鲜食玉米的农艺性状影响不同,海藻有机肥+微生物菌剂组合的产量指标优于化肥。氨基酸有机肥的各个营养成分含量在有机肥料处理中普遍处于较高水平。【结论】海藻有机肥+微生物菌剂综合促进鲜食玉米能力最强,氨基酸有机肥可保持较高产量的同时提升鲜食玉米营养成分及土壤养分。

关键词: 有机肥; 土壤; 鲜食玉米; 农艺性状; 产量; 品质

Abstract:

【Objective】In order to explore the effects of different organic fertilizers on fresh corn and determine suitable organic fertilizers for different planting needs. 【Methods】two varieties of fresh corn were used as the experimental materials and five different types of organic fertilizers were used as treatments. Soil fertility, agronomic traits, yield, and quality were conduct by comprehensive evaluation. 【Results】The results showed that the application of different organic fertilizers over two years led to a slow increase followed by a decrease in soil available potassium content, while other nutrient components increased annually. Amino acid organic fertilizer had the highest increase in organic matter content (0.32%), followed by microbial organic fertilizer. Chemical fertilizer had the highest increase in available nitrogen (4.75 mg/kg), available phosphorus (2.24 mg/kg), available potassium (13.55 mg/kg), total nitrogen (119.72 mg/kg), total phosphorus (33.28 mg/kg), and total potassium (1384.18 mg/kg) content, followed by amino acid organic fertilizer. Different organic fertilizers had varying effects on the agronomic traits of fresh corn, with the yield index of seaweed organic fertilizer combined with microbial agents being superior to chemical fertilizer. The nutrient content of amino acid organic fertilizer was generally at a higher level in the organic fertilizer treatments.【Conclusion】The results of comprehensive evaluation using membership function method showed that the combination of seaweed organic fertilizer and microbial agents was found to most effectively promote the ability of fresh corn, while amino acid organic fertilizer could maintain high yields while enhancing the nutritional content of fresh corn and soil fertility.

Key words: organic fertilizer; soil; fresh corn; agronomic traits; yield; quality

中图分类号:

S513

郝曦煜, 张仲鹃, 张斯文, 张瑾, 郑春秀, 吴世凯, 张永久. 不同有机肥对土壤肥力及鲜食玉米农艺性状、产量与品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(3): 619-626.

HAO Xiyu, LIU Tingting, WANG Hui, LENG Jingwen, GONG Shihang, LIU Wei. Selection and comprehensive evaluation of nitrogen-efficient foxtail millet varieties based on principal component analysis[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(3): 619-626.

图/表 10

参考文献 22

[1]	刁现民. 中国谷子产业与产业技术体系[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2011: 20-27.
	DIAO Xianmin. Chinese Foxtail Millet Industry and Industry Technology System[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2011: 20-27.
[2]	温晓南. 吉林省西部半干旱地区农业可持续发展研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2008.
	WEN Xiaonan. Agricultural Sustainable Development in the Semi-Arid Area in the West of Jilin Province[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2008.
[3]	郝曦煜, 梁杰, 郭文云, 等. 白城市特色食用豆产业发展优势分析[J]. 东北农业科学, 2019, 44(1): 87-90.
	HAO Xiyu, LIANG Jie, GUO Wenyun, et al. Analysis of advantages of development of characteristic food legumes industry in Baicheng[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 44(1): 87-90.
[4]	王慧敏, 李明昊, 李云, 等. 谷子品种(系)萌发期耐盐碱性鉴定及评价[J]. 作物杂志, 2023,(2): 57-66.
	WANG Huimin, LI Minghao, LI Yun, et al. Identification and evaluation of salt-alkali tolerance of foxtail millet cultivars(lines) at germination stage[J]. Crops, 2023,(2): 57-66.
[5]	刘晓东, 韩渊怀, 张海颖, 等. 33份谷子抗除草剂新种质农艺性状综合分析[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2023,(1): 155-158, 163.
	LIU Xiaodong, HAN Yuanhuai, ZHANG Haiying, et al. Comprehensive analysis of agronomic traits of 33 millet herbicide resistant germplasm[J]. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023,(1): 155-158, 163.
[6]	邢国芳, 侯颖, 王浩, 等. 谷子苗期硒高效品种筛选及评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2023, 24(1): 158-171. DOI
	XING Guofang, HOU Ying, WANG Hao, et al. Screening and evaluation of efficient utilization of selenium in foxtail millet at the seedling stage[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2023, 24(1): 158-171. DOI
[7]	朱晓东, 赵术伟, 陈国秋. 基于主成分分析的谷子品种萌芽期抗旱性鉴定与分类[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2021,(6): 1-7.
	ZHU Xiaodong, ZHAO Shuwei, CHEN Guoqiu. Identification and classification of millet cultivars for drought resistance during germination stage based on principal components analysis and cluster analysis[J]. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, 2021,(6): 1-7.
[8]	崔纪菡, 刘猛, 赵宇, 等. 不同形态氮对谷子生长和氮利用的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2021, 53(7): 58-64.
	CUI Jihan, LIU Meng, ZHAO Yu, et al. Effects of different nitrogen forms on growth and nitrogen utilization of foxtail millet[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 53(7): 58-64.
[9]	常闻谦, 刘鹏, 赵世伟. 水氮耦合对谷子拔节后生长、产量和水氮利用效率的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2018, 27(9): 1313-1321.
	CHANG Wenqian, LIU Peng, ZHAO Shiwei. Effects of water and nitrogen coupling on growth, yield and water and nitrogen utilization after millet jointing[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2018, 27(9): 1313-1321.
[10]	陈二影, 杨延兵, 秦岭, 等. 谷子苗期氮高效品种筛选及相关特性分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(17): 3287-3297. DOI
	CHEN Erying, YANG Yanbing, QIN Ling, et al. Evaluation of nitrogen efficient cultivars of foxtail millet and analysis of the related characters at seedling stage[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(17): 3287-3297. DOI
[11]	秦娜, 马春业, 朱灿灿, 等. 谷子氮高效基因型筛选及相关特性分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2019, 48(5): 22-29.
	QIN Na, MA Chunye, ZHU Cancan, et al. Screening of foxtail millet genotype with high nitrogen use efficiency and analysis of related characters[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 48(5): 22-29.
[12]	朱建平. 应用多元统计分析[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006.
	ZHU Jianping. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2006.
[13]	GB 5009.5-2016:食品安全国家标准食品中蛋白质的测定[S].
	GB 5009.5-2016.National food safety stands determination of protein in foods[S].
[14]	Pang J Y, Palta J A, Rebetzke G J, et al. Wheat genotypes with high early vigour accumulate more nitrogen and have higher photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency during early growth[J]. Functional Plant Biology, 2014, 41(2): 215. DOI PMID
[15]	宋晓, 张珂珂, 黄晨晨, 等. 基于主成分分析的氮高效小麦品种的筛选[J]. 河南农业科学, 2020, 49(12): 10-16.
	SONG Xiao, ZHANG Keke, HUANG Chenchen, et al. Selection of nitrogen-efficient wheat varieties based on principal component analysis[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 49(12): 10-16.
[16]	李强, 罗延宏, 谭杰, 等. 玉米杂交种苗期耐低氮指标的筛选与综合评价[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2014, 22(10): 1190-1199.
	LI Qiang, LUO Yanhong, TAN Jie, et al. Indexes screening and comprehensive evaluation of low nitrogen tolerance of hybrid maize cultivars at seedling stage[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2014, 22(10): 1190-1199.
[17]	许小宛, 姚俭昕, 高雅洁, 等. 一批新育成小麦品种(系)主要农艺性状分析及其分子标记鉴定[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2019, 39(5): 520-531.
	XU Xiaowan, YAO Jianxin, GAO Yajie, et al. Analyses on main agronomic traits of a batch of new wheat varieties(lines) and detection by molecular markers[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2019, 39(5): 520-531.
[18]	林蝉蝉, 何舟阳, 单文龙, 等. 基于主成分与聚类分析综合评价杨凌地区红色鲜食葡萄果实品质[J]. 果树学报, 2020, 37(4): 520-532.
	LIN Chanchan, HE Zhouyang, SHAN Wenlong, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality of 12 red table grape cultivars cultivated in Yangling area based on principal component and cluster analyses[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2020, 37(4): 520-532.
[19]	张楚, 张永清, 路之娟, 等. 苗期耐低氮基因型苦荞的筛选及其评价指标[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(8): 1205-1215.
	ZHANG Chu, ZHANG Yongqing, LU Zhijuan, et al. Screening Fagopyrum tararicum genotypes tolerant to low nitrogen stress at seedling stage and its evaluating indices[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2017, 43(8): 1205-1215.
[20]	赵化田, 王瑞芳, 许云峰, 等. 小麦苗期耐低氮基因型的筛选与评价[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2011, 19(5): 1199-1204.
	ZHAO Huatian, WANG Ruifang, XU Yunfeng, et al. Screening and evaluating low nitrogen tolerant wheat genotype at seedling stage[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2011, 19(5): 1199-1204.
[21]	王丹丹, 李燕, 张庆银, 等. 基于主成分分析的黄瓜新品种引进筛选综合评价[J]. 北方园艺, 2022,(23): 21-28.
	WANG Dandan, LI Yan, ZHANG Qingyin, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of introduction and screening of new cucumber varieties based on principal component analysis[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2022,(23): 21-28.
[22]	乌凤章, 张润梅, 尹泽宇, 等. 基于主成分分析的高丛蓝莓品种果实品质综合评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(22): 262-269.
	WU Fengzhang, ZHANG Runmei, YIN Zeyu, et al. Comprehensive quality evaluation of highbush blueberry cultivars based on principal component analysis[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 38(22): 262-269.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	16	0	0	42

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	35	23
比例	60%	40%

摘要

148

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	148

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	36	112
比例	24%	76%

处理 Treat- ments	肥料类型 Fertilization types	施用量 Amount of fertilizer
CK	—	—
F₀	化肥	尿素:75 kg/hm²,磷酸二铵:195 kg/hm², 硫酸钾:142.5 kg/hm²
F₁	生物质有机肥	2 700 kg/hm²
F₂	氨基酸有机肥	2 700 kg/hm²
F₃	黄腐酸有机肥	2 700 kg/hm²
F₄	海藻有机肥	2 700 kg/hm²
F₅	海藻有机肥+ 微生物菌剂	2 700 kg/hm²+60 L(600倍液)

处理 Treat- ments	肥料类型 Fertilization types	施用量 Amount of fertilizer
CK	—	—
F₀	化肥	尿素:75 kg/hm²,磷酸二铵:195 kg/hm², 硫酸钾:142.5 kg/hm²
F₁	生物质有机肥	2 700 kg/hm²
F₂	氨基酸有机肥	2 700 kg/hm²
F₃	黄腐酸有机肥	2 700 kg/hm²
F₄	海藻有机肥	2 700 kg/hm²
F₅	海藻有机肥+ 微生物菌剂	2 700 kg/hm²+60 L(600倍液)

指标 Indexes	隶属函数值Membership function value
指标 Indexes	CK	F₀	F₁	F₂	F₃	F₄	F₅
株高Plant height	0.000	0.247	1.000	0.860	0.105	0.189	0.185
穗位高Ear height	0.944	0.862	0.000	0.028	0.834	0.893	1.000
茎粗Stem diameter	0.675	0.927	0.000	0.672	0.927	0.927	1.000
穗长Ear length	1.000	0.411	0.046	0.000	0.823	0.509	0.529
秃尖长Ear bald tip length	0.548	0.514	0.114	0.000	0.410	0.357	1.000
穗粗Ear diameter	0.502	0.770	0.000	0.105	0.809	0.885	1.000
轴粗Corncob	0.511	1.000	0.000	0.102	0.866	0.758	0.691
穗行数Rows per ear	0.500	1.000	0.000	0.000	0.500	1.000	1.000
行粒数Kernel per row	0.000	0.183	1.000	0.726	0.046	0.091	0.183
单穗净重Net weight per ear	0.089	0.954	0.000	0.329	0.559	0.780	1.000
单穗鲜重Fresh weight per ear	0.000	0.183	1.000	0.726	0.046	0.091	0.183
轴重Cob weight	0.531	0.072	1.000	0.212	0.282	0.000	0.075
产量Yield	0.000	0.927	0.075	0.369	0.574	0.772	1.000
糖度Sugar content	0.176	0.224	0.931	1.000	0.112	0.321	0.000
蛋白质Crude protein	0.532	0.360	0.805	1.000	0.114	0.120	0.000
淀粉Starch	0.424	0.340	0.828	1.000	0.117	0.097	0.000
脂肪Ether extract	0.425	0.000	1.000	0.991	0.273	0.261	0.086
可溶性糖 Sugar content soluble sugar	0.031	0.264	1.000	0.747	0.000	0.516	0.302
花青素Anthocyanidin	0.389	1.000	0.019	0.409	0.000	0.112	0.961
隶属平均值 Average value of membership function	0.383	0.539	0.464	0.488	0.389	0.457	0.537
排序Ranking	7	1	4	3	6	5	2

指标 Indexes	隶属函数值Membership function value
指标 Indexes	CK	F₀	F₁	F₂	F₃	F₄	F₅
株高Plant height	0.000	0.247	1.000	0.860	0.105	0.189	0.185
穗位高Ear height	0.944	0.862	0.000	0.028	0.834	0.893	1.000
茎粗Stem diameter	0.675	0.927	0.000	0.672	0.927	0.927	1.000
穗长Ear length	1.000	0.411	0.046	0.000	0.823	0.509	0.529
秃尖长Ear bald tip length	0.548	0.514	0.114	0.000	0.410	0.357	1.000
穗粗Ear diameter	0.502	0.770	0.000	0.105	0.809	0.885	1.000
轴粗Corncob	0.511	1.000	0.000	0.102	0.866	0.758	0.691
穗行数Rows per ear	0.500	1.000	0.000	0.000	0.500	1.000	1.000
行粒数Kernel per row	0.000	0.183	1.000	0.726	0.046	0.091	0.183
单穗净重Net weight per ear	0.089	0.954	0.000	0.329	0.559	0.780	1.000
单穗鲜重Fresh weight per ear	0.000	0.183	1.000	0.726	0.046	0.091	0.183
轴重Cob weight	0.531	0.072	1.000	0.212	0.282	0.000	0.075
产量Yield	0.000	0.927	0.075	0.369	0.574	0.772	1.000
糖度Sugar content	0.176	0.224	0.931	1.000	0.112	0.321	0.000
蛋白质Crude protein	0.532	0.360	0.805	1.000	0.114	0.120	0.000
淀粉Starch	0.424	0.340	0.828	1.000	0.117	0.097	0.000
脂肪Ether extract	0.425	0.000	1.000	0.991	0.273	0.261	0.086
可溶性糖 Sugar content soluble sugar	0.031	0.264	1.000	0.747	0.000	0.516	0.302
花青素Anthocyanidin	0.389	1.000	0.019	0.409	0.000	0.112	0.961
隶属平均值 Average value of membership function	0.383	0.539	0.464	0.488	0.389	0.457	0.537
排序Ranking	7	1	4	3	6	5	2

不同有机肥对土壤肥力及鲜食玉米农艺性状、产量与品质的影响

Selection and comprehensive evaluation of nitrogen-efficient foxtail millet varieties based on principal component analysis

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 22

相关文章 15

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

[1]	章莲, 陈湘耀, 王潭刚, 马晓梅, 陈兵, 王刚, 段震宇. 高强度地膜对土壤温度、湿度及棉花生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(3): 539-545.
[2]	徐守振, 马麒, 宁新柱, 李吉莲, 宿俊吉, 韩焕勇, 王方永, 林海. 不同行距和脱叶剂对棉花脱叶效果的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(3): 546-555.
[3]	赵玉鹏, 陈波浪, 王治国, 付彦博, 扁青永. 不同碳源物质输入对板结黏土特性及棉花苗期生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(3): 556-571.
[4]	焦润兴, 卜东升, 邵延慧, 张涛, 陈玲, 张冬冬. “干播湿出”对不同盐碱化土壤水盐分布、养分及棉花产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(3): 572-583.
[5]	聂凌帆, 张金汕, 田文强, 孙刚刚, 王泓懿, 张君, 张强斌, 郭飞, 吴利, 石书兵. 不同水氮处理对超晚播冬麦生长、水氮利用及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(3): 584-592.
[6]	孙刚刚, 郭飞, 聂凌帆, 田文强, 王泓懿, 史永清, 吴利, 艾红玉, 张金汕, 石书兵. 种肥分离对冬小麦光合特性、干物质积累和产量形成的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(3): 593-599.
[7]	白世践, 户金鸽, 蔡军社, 吴久赟, 马小才, 袁森, 伍国红. 12个葡萄品种在吐鲁番葡萄产区的栽培特性及果实品质分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(3): 678-687.
[8]	傅鹏宇, 梁萌, 李晨华. 荒漠开垦与施肥对土壤有机碳储量与微生物群落特征的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(3): 739-747.
[9]	胡莎莎, 邵丽萍, 陈丽华, 宋卫平, 赵海, 张新宇, 孙杰. 脱叶剂对机采棉棉铃发育及纤维品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(2): 270-277.
[10]	刘跃, 连世昊, 李家豪, 王泓懿, 田文强, 聂凌帆, 孙刚刚, 贾永红, 石书兵, 于月华, 张金汕. 播期和密度对花生产量形成及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(2): 278-285.
[11]	陆明昆, 李军宏, 尼陆排尔·于苏甫江, 潘喜鹏, 刘晓成, 张正贵, 潘占磊, 翟梦华, 张要朋, 赵文琪, 王丽宏, 王占彪. 追施硅肥对棉花生长发育及产量品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(2): 286-293.
[12]	王奕丁, 张凯, 张凌健, 张慧, 郭小梦, 陈国悦. 滴灌量对新疆棉花生长发育、产量形成和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(2): 294-301.
[13]	王晓艳, 白云岗, 柴仲平, 卢震林, 刘洪波, 肖军, 阿曼尼萨. 休作期冬灌滴灌调控下“干播湿出”对棉花生长及产量影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(2): 302-313.
[14]	张腾艺, 李千里, 冯贝贝, 南坤, 闫鹏, 耿文娟. 金冠、维纳斯黄金、瑞雪苹果采收期的判定及果实品质的变化动态[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(2): 314-323.
[15]	李天乐, 白新禄, 安世杰, 郑强卿, 汤智辉, 支金虎. 水肥耦合对库尔勒香梨生长、果实品质及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(2): 335-342.