干旱胁迫下鸭茅苗期生长特性及耗水规律

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.06.022

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】 研究不同水分条件下鸭茅生长特性及耗水规律。【方法】 以7份来源不同的鸭茅为材料,观测其生长特性,用称重法研究其耗水变化。【结果】 (1)随干旱胁迫增大,各材料生长速度减缓,株高、分蘖数、地上及地上生物量逐渐降低;(2)7份鸭茅材料的耗水规律基本一致,随干旱胁迫增大,耗水量呈现逐渐降低趋势,但材料间耗水特性存在差异;(3)综合生长发育及耗水特性,新疆尼勒克县鸭茅表现最优,其次美国俄勒冈鸭茅,新疆乌鲁木齐市鸭茅表现最差。【结论】 不同种源鸭茅随干旱胁迫增强生长特性及耗水均呈现降低趋势,新疆野生鸭茅具有一定的抗旱性,优于两栽培品种。

关键词: 鸭茅; 干旱胁迫; 生长特性; 耗水特性; 水分利用率; 综合评价

Abstract:

【Objective】 To explore the growth characteristics and water consumption of D.glomerata under drought stress.【Method】 Seven D.glomerata materials from different sources were used as the research objects to observe their growth characteristics.The weighing method was used to study the change in water consumption.【Result】 (1) As the drought stress increases, the growth rate of each material slowed down, and the plant height, tiller number, and above-ground and above-ground biomass gradually decreased; (2) The water consumption law of the seven D.glomerata materials was basically the same and increased with the drought stress; Water consumption showed a gradual decrease trend, but there were differences in water consumption characteristics among materials; (3) Comprehensive growth and development and water consumption characteristics showed that D.glomeratas in Nilek County, Xinjiang had the best performance, followed by Dactylus Oregon in the United States and D.glomerata in Urumqi, Xinjiang.【Conclusion】 The growth characteristics and water consumption of Dactylis from different provenances show a decreasing trend with the increase of drought stress.In general, Xinjiang wild Dactylis has a certain drought resistance and is better than the two cultivated varieties, so it has important cultivation value.

Key words: Dactylisglomerata; drought stress; growth characteristics; water consumption characteristics; water use efficiency; comprehensive evaluation

中图分类号:

李江艳, 张鲜花, 袁小强, 袁惠, 刘雯欣. 干旱胁迫下鸭茅苗期生长特性及耗水规律[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(6): 1502-1512.

LI Jiangyan, ZHANG Xianhua, YUAN Xiaoqiang, YUAN Hui, LIU Wenxin. Study on the Growth Characteristics and Water Consumption Law of Dactylisglomerata Seedling under Drought Stress[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(6): 1502-1512.

图/表 10

参考文献 26

[1]	Gauthier P, Lumaret R. Bédécarrats.A.Ecotype differentiation and coexistence of two parapatric tetraploid subspecies of Cocksfoot (Dactylisglomerata) in the Alps[J]. New Phytologist, 1998, 139(4): 741-750. DOI URL
[2]	Peri P L, Moot D J, McNeil D L. An integrated model for predicting maximum net photosynthetic rate of cocksfoot(Dactylisglomerata L.) leaves in silvopastoral systems[J]. Agroforestry Systems, 2003, 58: 173-183. DOI URL
[3]	张洪江. 新源县山地草甸类草地保护区禾本科优良牧草资源[J]. 草业与畜牧, 2014,(6):15-18,21.
	ZHANG Hongjiang. High-quality gramineous forage resources in the mountain meadow grassland reserve of Xinyuan County[J]. Journal of Grassland and Forage Science, 2014,(6):15-18,21.
[4]	季杨, 梁小玉, 易军, 等. 干旱-复水对鸭茅生长及补偿效益影响研究[J]. 草学, 2017,(4):18-21.
	JI Yang, LIANG Xiaoyu, YI Jun, et al. Effects of Compensatory Benefits of Drought Stress and Rewatering on Growth of Orchardgrass[J]. Journal of Grassland and Forage Science, 2017,(4):18-21.
[5]	曾兵, 张新全, 彭燕, 等. 优良牧草鸭茅的温室抗旱性研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2006,(1):103-106.
	ZENG Bing, ZHANG Xinquan, PENG Yan, et al. Analysis on the Drought Tolerance of Dactylisglomerata in Greenhouse[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2006,(1):103-106.
[6]	季杨, 梁小玉, 易军, 等. 多胺浸种对鸭茅抗旱性的影响[J]. 草学, 2017,(3):36-40.
	JI Yang, LIANG Xiaoyu, YI Jun, et al. The Effects of polyamines presoaking on drought resistance of orchardgrass[J]. Journal of Grassland and Forage Science, 2017,(3):36-40.
[7]	季杨, 张新全, 彭燕, 等. 鸭茅种子萌发对渗透胁迫响应与耐旱性评价[J]. 草地学报, 2013, 21(4):737-743.
	JI Yang, ZHANG Xinquan, PENG Yan, et al. Seed germination response to osmotic stress and tolerance evaluation of orchardgrass[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2013, 21(4):737-743.
[8]	赵莉, 牟书勇, 张鲜花. 干旱胁迫下新疆野生鸭茅(Dactylisglomerata)苗期抗旱性生理特性[J]. 干旱区研究, 2015, 32(5):953-957.
	ZHAO Li, MU Shuyong, ZHANG Xianhua. On the physiological characteristic of drought resistance of native Dactylisglomerata in Xinjiang at seeding stage[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2015, 32(5):953-957.
[9]	季杨, 张新全, 彭燕, 等. 鸭茅优异种质材料苗期抗旱性鉴定及综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(5):1122-1126.
	JI Yang, ZHANG Xinquan, PENG Yan, et al. Drought resistance evaluation of orchardgrass (Dactylisglomerata) germplasms at seeding stage[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(5):1122-1126.
[10]	Fatemeh S, Mahdi M M, Aghafakhr M, et al. Physiological responses of drought tolerance in orchardgrass (Dactylisglomerata) in association with persistence and summer dormancy[J]. Crop and Pasture Science, 2018, 69(5):515-.526 DOI URL
[11]	覃凤飞, 沈益新, 李兰海, 等. 干旱胁迫对新疆三个优势牧草种的光合特性与水分利用效率的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(10):86-94.
	QIN Fengfei, SHEN Yixin, LI Lanhai, et al. Effect of drought stress on the photosynthetic characteristics and water use efficiency of three dominant forage grasses in Sinkiang[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(10):86-94.
[12]	蔡昆争. 作物根系生理生态学[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2011.
	CAI Kunzheng. Physiological Ecology of Crop Root System[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2011.
[13]	Dobbertin M. Tree growth as indicator of tree vitality and of tree reaction to environmental stress: a review[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2005, 124:319-333. DOI URL
[14]	Zlatev Z, Lidon F C. An overview on drought induced changes in plant growth, water relations and photosynthesis[J]. Food Agriculture, 2012, 24:57-72.
[15]	朱铁霞, 高凯, 卢长青, 等. 干旱胁迫对紫花苜蓿幼苗生长的影响[J]. 内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2008,(1):48-50.
	ZHU Tiexia, GAO Kai, LU Changqing, et al. The effect of drought stress on Alfalfa[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities (Natural Sciences), 2008,(1):48-50.
[16]	周海军, 顾洪如, 沈益新, 等. 干旱胁迫下两种钝叶草的生长和生理响应差异[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2008, 24(6):805-809.
	ZHOU Haijun, GU Hongru, SHEN Yixin, et al. Differences in growth and physiological responses of two augustinegrass (Stenotaphrum secundatum) to drought stress[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2008, 24(6):805-809.
[17]	周建松, 沈学根, 徐杰, 等. 不同定植期对龙茭2号秋茭产量的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2010,(9):114-115.
	ZHOU Jiansong, SHEN Xuegen, XU Jie, et al. Effects of different planting periods on the yield of Longjiao 2[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2010,(9):114-115.
[18]	杨丹, 张舒芸, 田新会, 等. 不同黑麦品种(品系)对持续干旱胁迫的形态适应性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(1):122-129.
	YANG Dan, ZHANG Shuyun, TIAN Xinhui, et al. Morphological adaptability of different rye varieties (Lines) to persistent drought stress[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(1):122-129.
[19]	韩志顺, 郑敏娜, 梁秀芝, 等. 干旱胁迫对不同紫花苜蓿品种形态特征和生理特性的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2020, 42(3):37-43.
	HAN Zhishun, ZHENG Minna, LIANG Xiuzhi, et al. Effects of drought stress on morphological and physiological characteristics of different Alfalfa cultivars[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2020, 42(3):37-43.
[20]	高宏云, 李军宏, 王远远, 等. 2个不同耐旱性棉花品种光合特性和干物质累积对干旱的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(2):233-244. DOI
	GAO Hongyun, LI Junhong, WANG Yuanyuan, et al. Response of photosynthetic characteristics and dry matter accumulation to drought of two cotton varieties with different drought resistance[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(2):233-244. DOI
[21]	王湛, 李银坤, 郭文忠, 等. 不同灌水量对温室茄子蒸腾规律及水分利用的影响[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2019,(7):6-10.
	WANG Zhan, LI Yinkun, GUO Wenzhong, et al. The effect of different irrigation amount on the transpiration rate and water use efficiency of autumn eggplant in greenhouses[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2019,(7):6-10.
[22]	马新, 李铭, 董鹏, 等. 不同土壤水分条件下文冠果阶段性耗水规律[J]. 西南农业学报, 2016, 29(10):2441-2444.
	MA Xin, LI Ming, DONG Peng, et al. Stage rules of water consumption of Xanthocerassorbifolia seedlings under different soil moisture conditions[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 29(10):2441-2444.
[23]	王海珍, 韩路, 李志军. 胡杨、灰叶胡杨蒸腾耗水规律初步研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2009, 23(8):186-189.
	WAMG Haizhen, HAN Lu, LI Zhijun. Preliminary probe to the transpiration water-consumption regularity of Populus euphraticu and Populuspruinosa in Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2009, 23(8):186-189.
[24]	李丽霞, 梁宗锁, 韩蕊莲. 土壤干旱对沙棘苗木生长及水分利用的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2002,(2):88-94.
	LI Lixia, LIANG Zongsuo, HAN Ruilian. Effect of soil drought on the growth and water use efficiency of seabuckthorn[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2002,(2):88-94.
[25]	王德梅, 于振文, 许振柱. 高产条件下不同小麦品种耗水特性和水分利用效率的差异[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(12):6552-6560.
	WANG Demei, YU Zhenwen, XU Zhenzhu. Water consumption characteristics and water use efficiency of different wheat cultivars with high yield[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(12):6552-6560.
[26]	褚鹏飞, 于振文, 王小燕, 等. 灌水量对小麦籽粒淀粉含量和相关酶活性及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(2):324-333.
	CHU Pengfei, YU Zhenwen, WANG Xiaoyan, et al. Effects of irrigation amount on grain starch content, starch synthase activity, and water use efficiency in wheat[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2009, 35(2):324-333. DOI URL

编号 Numbering	采集地点(来源) Collection location (source)	地理位置 Location		海拔 Altitude(m)	备注 Remarks
YM-1	中国新疆阿勒泰市	E87°40'48.7″	N48°08'39.3″	1 651	野生种
YM-2	中国新疆奇台县	E 89°45'19″	N43°03'22″	2 200	野生种
YM-3	中国新疆乌鲁木齐市	E 87°03'32″	N43°29'20″	1 816	野生种
YM-4	中国新疆塔城市	E83°00'35.0″	N47°06'29.2″	1 902	野生种
YM-5	中国新疆尼勒克县	E 87°34'6.23″	N43°48'36.2″	1 935	野生种

编号 Numbering	采集地点(来源) Collection location (source)	地理位置 Location		海拔 Altitude(m)	备注 Remarks
YM-1	中国新疆阿勒泰市	E87°40'48.7″	N48°08'39.3″	1 651	野生种
YM-2	中国新疆奇台县	E 89°45'19″	N43°03'22″	2 200	野生种
YM-3	中国新疆乌鲁木齐市	E 87°03'32″	N43°29'20″	1 816	野生种
YM-4	中国新疆塔城市	E83°00'35.0″	N47°06'29.2″	1 902	野生种
YM-5	中国新疆尼勒克县	E 87°34'6.23″	N43°48'36.2″	1 935	野生种

材料 material	胁迫程度Stress level
材料 material	L	M	H
YM-1	3.73±0.23^Ba	4.16±0.43^ABa	5.09±0.41^Aa
YM-2	2.11±0.07^Bbc	3.10±0.24^ABbc	3.56±0.53^Ab
YM-3	2.84±0.30^Ab	2.86±0.44^Abc	2.79±0.35^Ab
YM-4	2.56±0.11^Bbc	3.32±0.12^Aab	3.33±0.24^Ab
YM-5	2.77±0.45^Ab	3.28±0.34^Aab	3.16±0.31^Ab
YM-6	2.34±0.20^Abc	2.23±0.16^Ac	2.39±0.39^Ab
YM-7	1.87±0.12^Ac	2.41±0.36^Abc	2.57±0.14^Ab

材料 material	胁迫程度Stress level
材料 material	L	M	H
YM-1	3.73±0.23^Ba	4.16±0.43^ABa	5.09±0.41^Aa
YM-2	2.11±0.07^Bbc	3.10±0.24^ABbc	3.56±0.53^Ab
YM-3	2.84±0.30^Ab	2.86±0.44^Abc	2.79±0.35^Ab
YM-4	2.56±0.11^Bbc	3.32±0.12^Aab	3.33±0.24^Ab
YM-5	2.77±0.45^Ab	3.28±0.34^Aab	3.16±0.31^Ab
YM-6	2.34±0.20^Abc	2.23±0.16^Ac	2.39±0.39^Ab
YM-7	1.87±0.12^Ac	2.41±0.36^Abc	2.57±0.14^Ab

材料 material	胁迫程度Stress level
材料 material	L	M	H
YM-1	1.81±0.14^Ac			2.03±0.24^Ab	2.78±0.48^Ab
YM-2	2.55±0.19^Aabc			3.01±0.32^Aa	3.55±0.51^Ab
YM-3	2.09±0.12^Bbc			3.33±0.23^Ba	5.25±0.84^Aa
YM-4	2.01±0.3^Abc			3.16±0.14^Aa	3.48±0.71^Ab
YM-5	2.47±0.26^Babc			3.08±0.16^ABa	3.53±0.14^Ab
YM-6	2.66±0.34^Bab			3.35±0.24^ABa	3.71±0.35^Ab
YM-7	2.99±0.22^Aa			2.93±0.1^Aa	3.16±0.2^Ab