新疆农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (4): 835-844.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.04.006
• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学·生理生化 • 上一篇 下一篇
收稿日期:
2023-09-21
出版日期:
2024-04-20
发布日期:
2024-05-31
通信作者:
马亮(1980-),男,新疆石河子人,教授,博士,硕士生/博士生导师,研究方向为干旱区节水灌溉,(E-mail)xjmaliang@xjau.edu.cn作者简介:
朱韬(1999-),男,湖南益阳人,硕士研究生,研究方向为干旱区节水灌溉,(E-mail)1275727565@qq.com
基金资助:
ZHU Tao(), Lei Qingyuan, MA Liang(
)
Received:
2023-09-21
Published:
2024-04-20
Online:
2024-05-31
Correspondence author:
MA Liang(1980-),male, from Shihezi, Xinjiang. Professor, Ph.D.,research direction: Water-saving irrigation technology in arid area, (E-mail)xjmaliang@xjau.edu.cnSupported by:
摘要:
【目的】基于层次分析法及模糊综合评价模型在验证大田作物水氮优选方案的实用性,为制定新疆南疆玉米高效高产种植水氮配施方案提供参考。【方法】设置3个灌水梯度,分别为300 mm(W1)、400 mm(W2)、500 mm(W3);3个施氮梯度,分别为0 kg/hm2(F0)、250 kg/hm2(F1)、350 kg/hm2(F2),共9个处理(W1F0、W1F1、W1F2、W2F0、W2F1、W2F2、W3F0、W3F1、W3F2),每个处理3次重复,测定并分析滴灌条件下不同水氮配施对玉米株高、叶面积指数、干物质积累、产量以及水氮利用效率的影响,结合常规分析与模糊综合评价法寻求最优水氮配施方案并验证模型。【结果】适宜灌水量和施氮量下,水氮之间表现出显著交互作用,可以提高玉米的株高、叶面积指数、干物质积累量、积累速率和产量,棉花产量随施氮量和灌水量的增加呈抛物线变化,增产效率降低,适当的灌水量和施氮量可以获得较高的增产效率和水氮利用效率,在W2F1处理下,株高、叶面积指数、干物质积累量等达到最大值,产量增长率和水分利用率均达到最大值,分别为24.35%、3.89 kg/m3,氮肥利用效率仅次于W3F1。【结论】新疆阿克苏地区玉米适宜的灌水量和施氮量为400 mm和250 kg/hm2(W2F1)。
中图分类号:
朱韬, 雷庆元, 马亮. 不同水氮用量对复播玉米生长发育、产量及利用效率的影响和选优模型验证[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(4): 835-844.
ZHU Tao, Lei Qingyuan, MA Liang. Effects of water and nitrogen on growth, yield and water and nitrogen utilization efficiency of resown Maize and verification of scheme optimization model[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 835-844.
土层深 Soil depth (cm) | 有机质 Organic matter (g/kg) | 速效氮 Available nitrogen (mg/kg) | 速效磷 Available phosphorus (mg/kg) | 速效钾 Available potassium (mg/kg) | 总盐 Total salt (mg/g) | pH值 pH value | 田间持水量 Field capacity (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0~20 | 8.97 | 36.64 | 13.98 | 115.62 | 0.505 | 8.57 | 22.90 |
20~40 | 6.28 | 29.61 | 6.62 | 105.74 | 0.505 | 8.62 | 20.78 |
40~60 | 4.71 | 21.45 | 5.72 | 101.81 | 0.545 | 8.69 | 24.99 |
表1 试验地土壤性质及初始养分
Tab.1 Test soil properties and initial nutrients
土层深 Soil depth (cm) | 有机质 Organic matter (g/kg) | 速效氮 Available nitrogen (mg/kg) | 速效磷 Available phosphorus (mg/kg) | 速效钾 Available potassium (mg/kg) | 总盐 Total salt (mg/g) | pH值 pH value | 田间持水量 Field capacity (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0~20 | 8.97 | 36.64 | 13.98 | 115.62 | 0.505 | 8.57 | 22.90 |
20~40 | 6.28 | 29.61 | 6.62 | 105.74 | 0.505 | 8.62 | 20.78 |
40~60 | 4.71 | 21.45 | 5.72 | 101.81 | 0.545 | 8.69 | 24.99 |
处理 Teatments | 六叶期 Six leaf | 十二叶期 Twelve leaf | 吐丝期 Silking | 灌浆期 Grouting |
---|---|---|---|---|
W1F0 | 1.62 de | 2.51 de | 3.51 e | 4.43 f |
W1F1 | 1.77 cd | 2.58 cd | 3.83 cd | 4.91 d |
W1F2 | 1.59 e | 2.41 e | 3.28 f | 4.37 f |
W2F0 | 1.74 cde | 2.57 cd | 3.31 f | 4.44 f |
W2F1 | 1.80bc | 2.96 b | 3.74d | 5.17 c |
W2F2 | 1.94 ab | 3.00 b | 4.35 a | 5.31 b |
W3F0 | 1.80 bc | 2.68 c | 3.91 c | 4.66 e |
W3F1 | 1.87 abc | 3.05b | 4.10 b | 5.42 ab |
W3F2 | 2.01 a | 3.28a | 4.18 b | 5.48 a |
表2 不同水氮处理下玉米叶面积指数的变化
Tab.2 Changes of maize leaf area indexunder different irrigation and nitrogen rates
处理 Teatments | 六叶期 Six leaf | 十二叶期 Twelve leaf | 吐丝期 Silking | 灌浆期 Grouting |
---|---|---|---|---|
W1F0 | 1.62 de | 2.51 de | 3.51 e | 4.43 f |
W1F1 | 1.77 cd | 2.58 cd | 3.83 cd | 4.91 d |
W1F2 | 1.59 e | 2.41 e | 3.28 f | 4.37 f |
W2F0 | 1.74 cde | 2.57 cd | 3.31 f | 4.44 f |
W2F1 | 1.80bc | 2.96 b | 3.74d | 5.17 c |
W2F2 | 1.94 ab | 3.00 b | 4.35 a | 5.31 b |
W3F0 | 1.80 bc | 2.68 c | 3.91 c | 4.66 e |
W3F1 | 1.87 abc | 3.05b | 4.10 b | 5.42 ab |
W3F2 | 2.01 a | 3.28a | 4.18 b | 5.48 a |
处理 Teatments | 六叶期 Six leaf | 十二叶期 Twelve leaf | 吐丝期 Silking | 灌浆期 Grouting | 成熟期 Mature |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1F0 | 24.12ab | 86.28a | 100.84a | 151.42c | 171.49e |
W2F0 | 23.62ab | 74.82ab | 101.06a | 174.23bc | 194.32d |
W3F0 | 22.37ab | 77.17ab | 97.29a | 195.55ab | 220.31c |
W1F1 | 22.62ab | 73.33ab | 117.29a | 177.22abc | 183.75de |
W2F1 | 22.37ab | 72.17ab | 125.76a | 199.99ab | 242.4b |
W3F1 | 20.13b | 63.92b | 126.65a | 212.75a | 253.37b |
W1F2 | 23.83ab | 77.68ab | 103.44a | 150.37c | 168.37e |
W2F2 | 25.28a | 72.93ab | 112.36a | 196.77ab | 250.21b |
W3F2 | 22.6ab | 65.85b | 120.80a | 208.20ab | 276.13a |
表3 不同水氮处理下玉米干物质积累变化
Tab.3 Dynamic changes of dry matter accumulation in Maize under different combinations of irrigation and nitrogen application
处理 Teatments | 六叶期 Six leaf | 十二叶期 Twelve leaf | 吐丝期 Silking | 灌浆期 Grouting | 成熟期 Mature |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1F0 | 24.12ab | 86.28a | 100.84a | 151.42c | 171.49e |
W2F0 | 23.62ab | 74.82ab | 101.06a | 174.23bc | 194.32d |
W3F0 | 22.37ab | 77.17ab | 97.29a | 195.55ab | 220.31c |
W1F1 | 22.62ab | 73.33ab | 117.29a | 177.22abc | 183.75de |
W2F1 | 22.37ab | 72.17ab | 125.76a | 199.99ab | 242.4b |
W3F1 | 20.13b | 63.92b | 126.65a | 212.75a | 253.37b |
W1F2 | 23.83ab | 77.68ab | 103.44a | 150.37c | 168.37e |
W2F2 | 25.28a | 72.93ab | 112.36a | 196.77ab | 250.21b |
W3F2 | 22.6ab | 65.85b | 120.80a | 208.20ab | 276.13a |
处理 Treatments | 耗水量 Water consumption (mm) | 水分利 用效率 WUE (kg/m3) | 氮肥偏 生产力 PFPN (kg/kg) | 氮肥农 学效率 ANUE (kg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|
W1F0 | 218.50e | 3.80a | / | / |
W2F0 | 262.38cd | 3.65b | / | / |
W3F0 | 320.15b | 3.24d | / | / |
W1F1 | 224.57e | 3.89a | 35.61b | 1.75e |
W2F1 | 279.19c | 3.89a | 44.28a | 5.24b |
W3F1 | 366.46a | 3.29d | 49.18a | 6.92a |
W1F2 | 249.64d | 3.60bc | 26.20c | 2.01f |
W2F2 | 317.55b | 3.50c | 32.34b | 4.45d |
W3F2 | 371.21a | 3.26d | 35.23b | 5.04c |
表4 不同水氮处理下玉米水氮利用效率变化
Tab.4 Changes of water and nitrogen use efficiency of Maize under different irrigation and nitrogen application combinations
处理 Treatments | 耗水量 Water consumption (mm) | 水分利 用效率 WUE (kg/m3) | 氮肥偏 生产力 PFPN (kg/kg) | 氮肥农 学效率 ANUE (kg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|
W1F0 | 218.50e | 3.80a | / | / |
W2F0 | 262.38cd | 3.65b | / | / |
W3F0 | 320.15b | 3.24d | / | / |
W1F1 | 224.57e | 3.89a | 35.61b | 1.75e |
W2F1 | 279.19c | 3.89a | 44.28a | 5.24b |
W3F1 | 366.46a | 3.29d | 49.18a | 6.92a |
W1F2 | 249.64d | 3.60bc | 26.20c | 2.01f |
W2F2 | 317.55b | 3.50c | 32.34b | 4.45d |
W3F2 | 371.21a | 3.26d | 35.23b | 5.04c |
性状模糊集 Character fuzzy set | 株高 Plant height | 叶面积指数 LAI | 干物质量 Dry matter accumulation | CGR变化率 Change rate of CGR | 产量 Yield | 增产率 Yield growth rate | 水分利 用效率 WUE | 氮肥偏 生产力 PFPN | 氮肥农 学效率 ANUE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | 0.327 | 0.327 | 0.328 | 0 | 0.319 | 0 | 0.337 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
0.334 | 0.328 | 0.351 | 0 | 0.335 | 0 | 0.344 | 0.576 | 0.465 | |
0.339 | 0.344 | 0.322 | 0 | 0.346 | 0 | 0.319 | 0.424 | 0.535 | |
R2 | 0.324 | 0.317 | 0.283 | 0.147 | 0.303 | 0.243 | 0.331 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
0.335 | 0.334 | 0.353 | 0.338 | 0.343 | 0.386 | 0.352 | 0.578 | 0.541 | |
0.341 | 0.350 | 0.364 | 0.515 | 0.351 | 0.371 | 0.317 | 0.422 | 0.459 | |
R3 | 0.310 | 0.288 | 0.294 | 0.460 | 0.300 | 0.292 | 0.328 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
0.338 | 0.350 | 0.338 | 0.173 | 0.349 | 0.392 | 0.341 | 0.583 | 0.578 | |
0.352 | 0.361 | 0.368 | 0.367 | 0.350 | 0.317 | 0.331 | 0.417 | 0.422 |
表5 玉米指标的性状模糊集
Tab.5 The maize character fuzzy set of index
性状模糊集 Character fuzzy set | 株高 Plant height | 叶面积指数 LAI | 干物质量 Dry matter accumulation | CGR变化率 Change rate of CGR | 产量 Yield | 增产率 Yield growth rate | 水分利 用效率 WUE | 氮肥偏 生产力 PFPN | 氮肥农 学效率 ANUE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | 0.327 | 0.327 | 0.328 | 0 | 0.319 | 0 | 0.337 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
0.334 | 0.328 | 0.351 | 0 | 0.335 | 0 | 0.344 | 0.576 | 0.465 | |
0.339 | 0.344 | 0.322 | 0 | 0.346 | 0 | 0.319 | 0.424 | 0.535 | |
R2 | 0.324 | 0.317 | 0.283 | 0.147 | 0.303 | 0.243 | 0.331 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
0.335 | 0.334 | 0.353 | 0.338 | 0.343 | 0.386 | 0.352 | 0.578 | 0.541 | |
0.341 | 0.350 | 0.364 | 0.515 | 0.351 | 0.371 | 0.317 | 0.422 | 0.459 | |
R3 | 0.310 | 0.288 | 0.294 | 0.460 | 0.300 | 0.292 | 0.328 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
0.338 | 0.350 | 0.338 | 0.173 | 0.349 | 0.392 | 0.341 | 0.583 | 0.578 | |
0.352 | 0.361 | 0.368 | 0.367 | 0.350 | 0.317 | 0.331 | 0.417 | 0.422 |
因素 Factors | A1 | A2 | A3 | A4 | A5 | A6 | A7 | A8 | A9 | D1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | 1 | 1 | 1/4 | 1/4 | 1/5 | 1/5 | 1/5 | 1/3 | 1/3 | 0.024 |
A2 | 1 | 1 | 1/4 | 1/4 | 1/5 | 1/5 | 1/5 | 1/3 | 1/3 | 0.024 |
A3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 2 | 2 | 0.089 |
A4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 2 | 2 | 0.092 |
A5 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0.159 |
A6 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0.178 |
A7 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0.202 |
A8 | 3 | 3 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/3 | 1/3 | 1/3 | 1 | 1 | 0.094 |
A9 | 3 | 3 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/3 | 1/3 | 1/3 | 1 | 1 | 0.136 |
表6 判断矩阵A及权重
Tab.6 Judgement matrix A and its weight
因素 Factors | A1 | A2 | A3 | A4 | A5 | A6 | A7 | A8 | A9 | D1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | 1 | 1 | 1/4 | 1/4 | 1/5 | 1/5 | 1/5 | 1/3 | 1/3 | 0.024 |
A2 | 1 | 1 | 1/4 | 1/4 | 1/5 | 1/5 | 1/5 | 1/3 | 1/3 | 0.024 |
A3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 2 | 2 | 0.089 |
A4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 2 | 2 | 0.092 |
A5 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0.159 |
A6 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0.178 |
A7 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0.202 |
A8 | 3 | 3 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/3 | 1/3 | 1/3 | 1 | 1 | 0.094 |
A9 | 3 | 3 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 1/3 | 1/3 | 1/3 | 1 | 1 | 0.136 |
因素 Factors | C1 | C2 | C3 | D2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | 1 | 1/3 | 3 | 0.260 |
C2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 0.633 |
C3 | 1/3 | 1/5 | 1 | 0.106 |
表7 判断矩阵C及权重
Tab.7 Judgement matrix A and its weight
因素 Factors | C1 | C2 | C3 | D2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | 1 | 1/3 | 3 | 0.260 |
C2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 0.633 |
C3 | 1/3 | 1/5 | 1 | 0.106 |
[1] | 李洪铭. 浅谈我国玉米制种产业的发展现状及建议[J]. 中国食品, 2021,(21): 88-89. |
LI Hongming. Discussion on the development status and suggestions of maize seed production industry in China[J]. China Food, 2021,(21): 88-89. | |
[2] | 新疆维吾尔自治区统计局. 《新疆统计年鉴》[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2021. |
Statistic Bureau of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. Xinjiang Statistical Yearbook[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2021. | |
[3] | 司海丽, 纪立东, 李磊. 水肥协同对水果玉米生长发育及土壤养分的影响[J]. 节水灌溉, 2020,(5): 68-72. |
SI Haili, JI Lidong, LI Lei. Effects of water and fertilizer coordination on growth of fruit corn and soil nutrients[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2020,(5): 68-72. | |
[4] | 姚鹏飞. 农田水利工程高效节水灌溉发展思路[J]. 乡村科技, 2020,(8): 118-119. |
YAO Pengfei. Thoughts on the development of high-efficiency water-saving irrigation in farmland water conservancy projects[J]. Rural Science and Technology, 2020,(8): 118-119. | |
[5] | 王海艺, 韩烈保, 黄明勇. 干旱条件下水肥耦合作用机理和效应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2006, 22(6): 124-128. |
WANG Haiyi, HAN Liebao, HUANG Mingyong. Mechanism and effect of water and fertilizer coupling under drought stresses[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2006, 22(6): 124-128.
DOI |
|
[6] | 张晓梅, 张碧胜, 匡双便. 云南省冬季鲜食玉米高产栽培技术[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2016,(7): 174-175. |
ZHANG Xiaomei, ZHANG Bisheng, KUANG Shuang(Bian|Pian). High-yield cultivation techniques of fresh corn in winter in Yunnan Province[J]. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2016,(7): 174-175. | |
[7] | 张富仓, 严富来, 范兴科, 等. 滴灌施肥水平对宁夏春玉米产量和水肥利用效率的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(22): 111-120. |
ZHANG Fucang, YAN Fulai, FAN Xingke, et al. Effects of irrigation and fertilization levels on grain yield and water-fertilizer use efficiency of drip-fertigation spring maize in Ningxia[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(22): 111-120. | |
[8] | 孙云云, 刘方明, 高玉山, 等. 吉林西部膜下滴灌水氮调控对玉米生长及水肥利用的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2020, 39(11): 76-82. |
SUN Yunyun, LIU Fangming, GAO Yushan, et al. Regulating water and fertilizer application in film-mulched drip irrigation to improve growth and water-fertilizer utilization of maize in western Jilin[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2020, 39(11): 76-82. | |
[9] | 连彩云, 马忠明. 水肥用量对制种玉米水肥利用及种子活力的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2021, 39(1): 128-135. |
LIAN Caiyun, MA Zhongming. Rates of water and fertilizer on their use efficiencyand seed vigor of seed maize[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2021, 39(1): 128-135. | |
[10] | Gheysari M, Mirlatifi S M, Bannayan M, et al. Interaction of water and nitrogen on maize grown for silage[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2009, 96(5): 809-821. |
[11] | 吴婕. 不同灌水水平对河西绿洲玉米干物质积累过程及产量影响[J]. 节水灌溉, 2019,(7): 45-48, 55. |
WU Jie. Experimental study on the effect of irrigation on dry matter accumulation and yield of maize in Hexi oasis[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2019,(7): 45-48, 55. | |
[12] |
王士杰, 尹光华, 李忠, 等. 浅埋滴灌水肥耦合对辽西半干旱区春玉米产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(1): 139-147.
DOI |
WANG Shijie, YIN Guanghua, LI Zhong, et al. Effects of water-fertilizer coupling on the yield of spring maize under shallow-buried drip irrigation in semi-arid region of western Liaoning Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(1): 139-147.
DOI |
|
[13] | 林彦宇, 徐丹. 基于模糊综合评判法的稻作水肥耦合综合评价[J]. 黑龙江水利, 2015,(1):39-41. |
LIN Yanyu, XU Dan. Comprehensive evaluation of coupling of water and fertilizer in rice farming based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J]. Hydro Science and Cold Zone Engineering, 2015,(1):39-41. | |
[14] | 韩丙芳, 田军仓, 李应海, 等. 宁夏灌区不同水肥处理对膜上灌玉米性状影响的模糊评判[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2005, 24(4): 29-32. |
HAN Bingfang, TIAN Juncang, LI Yinghai, et al. Fuzzy evaluation of maize characteristics irrigated from the film hole with different combination between water and fertilizer in Ningxia irri gation district[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2005, 24(4): 29-32. | |
[15] | 王伟妮, 鲁剑巍, 李银水, 等. 当前生产条件下不同作物施肥效果和肥料贡献率研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(19): 3997-4007. |
WANG Weini, LU Jianwei, LI Yinshui, et al. Study on fertilization effect and fertilizer contribution rate of different crops at present production conditions[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(19): 3997-4007. | |
[16] |
梁哲军, 齐宏立, 王玉香, 等. 不同滴灌定额对玉米光合性能及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(36): 74-78.
DOI |
LIANG Zhejun, QI Hongli, WANG Yuxiang, et al. Effects of different drip irrigation quota on photosynthetic performance and water use efficiency of maize[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(36): 74-78.
DOI |
|
[17] | 李铁男, 李美娟, 王大伟. 不同灌溉方式对玉米生物学效应影响研究[J]. 节水灌溉, 2011,(10): 24-25, 28. |
LI Tienan, LI Meijuan, WANG Dawei. Study on influence of different irrigation methods on corn biological effect[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2011,(10): 24-25, 28. | |
[18] | 魏永霞, 马瑛瑛, 刘慧, 等. 调亏灌溉下滴灌玉米植株与土壤水分及节水增产效应[J]. 农业机械学报, 2018, 49(3): 252-260. |
WEI Yongxia, MA Yingying, LIU Hui, et al. Effects of soil water, plant, water saving and yield increasing of maize under regulated deficit drip irrigation[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2018, 49(3): 252-260. | |
[19] |
吕丽华, 董志强, 曹洁璇, 等. 播期、收获期对玉米物质生产及光能利用的调控效应[J]. 华北农学报, 2013, 28(S1): 177-183.
DOI |
LYU Lihua, DONG Zhiqiang, CAO Jiexuan, et al. Effects of planting and harvest date on matter production of summer maize and its utilization of solar and heat resource[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2013, 28(S1): 177-183. | |
[20] | 徐泰森, 孙扬, 刘彦萱, 等. 膜下滴灌水肥耦合对半干旱区玉米生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2016, 24(5): 118-122. |
XU Taisen, SUN Yang, LIU Yanxuan, et al. Effects of combinations of water and nitrogen on growth and yield of drip irrigation under plastic film mulching maize in western Jilin Province[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2016, 24(5): 118-122. | |
[21] | 吕刚, 史东梅. 三峡库区春玉米水肥耦合效应研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2005, 19(3): 192-195. |
LYU Gang, SHI Dongmei. Coupling effect of water and fertilizers on spring corn in Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 2005, 19(3): 192-195. | |
[22] | 冯亚阳, 史海滨, 李瑞平, 等. 膜下滴灌水氮耦合效应对玉米干物质与产量的影响[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2018, 36(8): 750-755. |
FENG Yayang, SHI Haibin, LI Ruiping, et al. Water-nitrogen coupling effect by mulched drip irrigation on dry matter and yield of maize[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2018, 36(8): 750-755. | |
[23] |
王旭敏, 雒文鹤, 刘朋召, 等. 节水减氮对夏玉米干物质和氮素积累转运及产量的调控效应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(15): 3183-3197.
DOI |
WANG Xumin, LUO Wenhe, LIU Pengzhao, et al. Regulation effects of water saving and nitrogen reduction on dry matter and nitrogen accumulation, transportation and yield of summer maize[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(15): 3183-3197.
DOI |
|
[24] | 王雯, 张雄, 白盼盼, 等. 滴灌条件下水肥耦合对春玉米光合速率及产量的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2021, 49(9): 1100-1104. |
WANG Wen, ZHANG Xiong, BAI Panpan, et al. Effects of water-fertilizer coupling on photosynthetic rate and yield of spring maize under drip irrigation[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 49(9): 1100-1104. | |
[25] | 惠晓丽, 马清霞, 王朝辉, 等. 基于旱地小麦高产优质的氮肥用量优化[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(2): 233-244. |
HUI Xiaoli, MA Qingxia, WANG Zhaohui, et al. Optimization of nitrogen rate based on grain yield and nutrient contents in dryland wheat production[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(2): 233-244. | |
[26] | 刘凡, 刘斌祥, 刘佳媛, 等. 水氮互作对川中丘陵区玉米水肥利用效率和产量形成的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2021, 39(6): 200-206. |
LIU Fan, LIU Binxiang, LIU Jiayuan, et al. Effect of water and nitrogen interaction on maize utilization efficiency of fertilizer, water and yield formation in the Middle Hilly Area of Sichuan Province[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2021, 39(6): 200-206. | |
[27] | 张建军, 党翼, 赵刚, 等. 控释氮肥全量基施对旱地玉米产量形成和水肥利用效率的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(2): 170-177. |
ZHANG Jianjun, DANG Yi, ZHAO Gang, et al. Effects of application of controlled-release nitrogen on yield and water and fertilizer use efficiency of maize[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 35(2): 170-177. | |
[28] | 徐剑, 赵经华, 马英杰, 等. 水氮耦合条件下打瓜产量及耗水性的模糊综合评判[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2019, 37(3): 110-116. |
XU Jian, ZHAO Jinghua, MA Yingjie, et al. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of yield and water consumptionof seeding-watermelon under water-nitrogen coupling condition[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2019, 37(3): 110-116. |
[1] | 张磊, 孙诗仁, 谢小清, 王业建, 李冬, 唐怀君, 刘成. 额敏县玉米灌溉用水现状及节水灌溉策略[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 81-84. |
[2] | 张泽华, 叶含春, 王振华, 李文昊, 李海强, 刘健. 等氮配施脲酶抑制剂对滴灌棉花生长发育和产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111. |
[3] | 陈瑞杰, 罗林毅, 阮向阳, 冶军. 腐植酸对滴灌棉田土壤养分和棉花产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121. |
[4] | 黄铂轩, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 孙淼, 邵晶晶, 冯卫娜, 庞朝友, 徐文修, 董合林. 不同氮素抑制剂对棉花生长发育、氮素利用与产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131. |
[5] | 张鸟, 王卉, 冯国郡, 再吐尼古丽·库尔班. 不同粒用高粱品种产量和农艺性状及品质的差异性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2160-2167. |
[6] | 陈芳, 李字辉, 孙孝贵, 张庭军. 不同剂量的微生物菌剂对加工番茄产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289. |
[7] | 张承洁, 胡浩然, 段松江, 吴一帆, 张巨松. 氮肥与密度互作对海岛棉生长发育及产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830. |
[8] | 候丽丽, 王伟, 崔新菊, 周大伟. 有机无机肥配施对冬小麦产量和土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1845-1852. |
[9] | 陈芳, 李字辉, 王兵跃, 孙孝贵, 张庭军. 微生物菌剂对冬小麦生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1853-1860. |
[10] | 袁莹莹, 赵经华, 迪力穆拉提·司马义, 杨庭瑞. 基于apriori算法对盆栽春小麦生理指标及产量的分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1861-1871. |
[11] | 牛婷婷, 马明生, 张军高. 秸秆还田和覆膜对旱作雨养农田土壤理化性质及春玉米产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1896-1906. |
[12] | 赵敏华, 宋秉曦, 张宇鹏, 高志红, 朱勇勇, 陈晓远. 旱作条件下氮肥减施对水稻产量及氮肥偏生产力的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1907-1915. |
[13] | 胡华兵, 孙琳琳, 刘建雄, 贺碧微, 刘珣, 郇町, 李有芳. 滴灌甜菜糖分积累与温度的相关性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1916-1925. |
[14] | 李锁丞, 柳延涛, 董红业, 孙振博, 李紫薇, 张春媛, 王开勇, 李强, 杨明凤. 不同施钾量对滴灌花生光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1926-1936. |
[15] | 张彩虹, 王国强, 姜鲁艳, 刘涛, 德贤明. 低能耗组装式深冬生产型日光温室环境因子变化及番茄性状分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 2043-2053. |
阅读次数 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
全文 53
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
摘要 260
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||