Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (10): 2404-2411.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.10.008
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Germplasm Resources·Molecular Genetics • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Lulu1(), ZHANG Jinshan1, JIA Yonghong2, LI Peng1, Gulinigaer Turghun1, WANG Runqi1, DONG Yanxue1, SHI Shubing1()
Received:
2023-02-22
Online:
2023-10-20
Published:
2023-11-01
Correspondence author:
SHI Shubing (1966 - ), male, Shanghe Shandong, professor, doctoral supervisor, research direction is wheat high yield cultivation, (E-mail)Supported by:
张路路1(), 张金汕1, 贾永红2, 李鹏1, 古力尼尕尔·吐尔洪1, 王润琪1, 董艳雪1, 石书兵1()
通讯作者:
石书兵(1966 - ),男,山东商河人,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为小麦高产栽培,(E-mail)作者简介:
张路路(1994 - ),女,河南沈丘人,硕士,研究方向为小麦高产栽培,(E-mail)luck11131114@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
ZHANG Lulu, ZHANG Jinshan, JIA Yonghong, LI Peng, Gulinigaer Turghun, WANG Runqi, DONG Yanxue, SHI Shubing. Relationship between electrical conductivity of seed soaking solution and seed viability in wheat spike parts[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(10): 2404-2411.
张路路, 张金汕, 贾永红, 李鹏, 古力尼尕尔·吐尔洪, 王润琪, 董艳雪, 石书兵. 小麦穗部位种子浸泡液电导率与种子活力的关系[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2404-2411.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.10.008
性状 Trait | 变幅 Range | 平均值 Mean | 标准差 Standard deviation |
---|---|---|---|
苗高Seed height(mm) | 37.08~86.08 | 67.90 | 11.19 |
苗鲜重Seedling fresh weight(mg) | 17.02~67.10 | 49.23 | 13.34 |
苗干重Seedling dry weight(mg) | 1.49~7.09 | 5.06 | 1.52 |
发芽势Germination energy(%) | 0.59~0.95 | 0.81 | 0.08 |
发芽率Germination rate(%) | 0.61~0.96 | 0.84 | 0.08 |
发芽指数Germination index | 24.32~38.80 | 32.95 | 3.41 |
活力指数Vigor index | 459.25~2498.35 | 1645.32 | 525.25 |
简化种子活力指数Simplified vigor inde | 12.71~62.31 | 41.70 | 13.14 |
电导率Electrical conductivity(μS/(cm·g)) | 11.26~80.56 | 29.24 | 21.46 |
Tab.1 Statistical characteristics of seed electrical conductivity value and standard germination traits
性状 Trait | 变幅 Range | 平均值 Mean | 标准差 Standard deviation |
---|---|---|---|
苗高Seed height(mm) | 37.08~86.08 | 67.90 | 11.19 |
苗鲜重Seedling fresh weight(mg) | 17.02~67.10 | 49.23 | 13.34 |
苗干重Seedling dry weight(mg) | 1.49~7.09 | 5.06 | 1.52 |
发芽势Germination energy(%) | 0.59~0.95 | 0.81 | 0.08 |
发芽率Germination rate(%) | 0.61~0.96 | 0.84 | 0.08 |
发芽指数Germination index | 24.32~38.80 | 32.95 | 3.41 |
活力指数Vigor index | 459.25~2498.35 | 1645.32 | 525.25 |
简化种子活力指数Simplified vigor inde | 12.71~62.31 | 41.70 | 13.14 |
电导率Electrical conductivity(μS/(cm·g)) | 11.26~80.56 | 29.24 | 21.46 |
Fig.1 Relationship between electrical conductivity and seedling height, seedling fresh weight, seedling dry weight, germination rate, germination potential, germination index, vigor index and simplified seed vigor index
性状 Trait | 类型 Types | 变幅 Range | 平均值 Mean | 标准差 Standard deviation | F值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
第1类 | 63.98~86.08 | 73.12 | 5.46 | ||
苗高Seed height(mm) | 第2类 | 37.08~52.39 | 44.96 | 6.02 | 39.47** |
第3类 | 42.74~74.27 | 65.29 | 9.28 | ||
第1类 | 42.22~67.10 | 56.56 | 5.22 | ||
苗鲜重Seedling fresh weight(mg) | 第2类 | 17.02~28.64 | 22.03 | 4.29 | 61.476** |
第3类 | 18.67~55.05 | 43.03 | 10.40 | ||
第1类 | 4.30~7.09 | 5.96 | 0.61 | ||
苗干重Seedling dry weight(mg) | 第2类 | 1.49~2.44 | 2.05 | 0.35 | 80.382** |
第3类 | 1.85~5.28 | 4.13 | 0.97 | ||
第1类 | 0.71~0.95 | 0.84 | 0.06 | ||
发芽势Germination energy(%) | 第2类 | 0.74~0.81 | 0.78 | 0.03 | 6.902** |
第3类 | 0.59~0.88 | 0.75 | 0.09 | ||
第1类 | 0.72~0.96 | 0.87 | 0.06 | ||
发芽率Germination rate(%) | 第2类 | 0.75~0.84 | 0.80 | 0.04 | 10.03** |
第3类 | 0.61~0.88 | 0.77 | 0.09 | ||
第1类 | 28.72~38.8 | 34.35 | 2.54 | ||
发芽指数Germination index | 第2类 | 27.3~31.81 | 30.10 | 1.86 | 8.817** |
第3类 | 24.32~36.57 | 30.61 | 4.03 | ||
第1类 | 1208.68~2498.35 | 1946.05 | 261.38 | ||
活力指数vigor index | 第2类 | 459.25~890.47 | 667.28 | 154.15 | 52.972** |
第3类 | 505.64~1652.51 | 1322.37 | 360.9 | ||
简化种子活力指数 Simplified vigor inde | 第1类 | 30.36~62.31 | 49.36 | 6.66 | 54.298** |
Tab.2 Different types of traits with conductivity
性状 Trait | 类型 Types | 变幅 Range | 平均值 Mean | 标准差 Standard deviation | F值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
第1类 | 63.98~86.08 | 73.12 | 5.46 | ||
苗高Seed height(mm) | 第2类 | 37.08~52.39 | 44.96 | 6.02 | 39.47** |
第3类 | 42.74~74.27 | 65.29 | 9.28 | ||
第1类 | 42.22~67.10 | 56.56 | 5.22 | ||
苗鲜重Seedling fresh weight(mg) | 第2类 | 17.02~28.64 | 22.03 | 4.29 | 61.476** |
第3类 | 18.67~55.05 | 43.03 | 10.40 | ||
第1类 | 4.30~7.09 | 5.96 | 0.61 | ||
苗干重Seedling dry weight(mg) | 第2类 | 1.49~2.44 | 2.05 | 0.35 | 80.382** |
第3类 | 1.85~5.28 | 4.13 | 0.97 | ||
第1类 | 0.71~0.95 | 0.84 | 0.06 | ||
发芽势Germination energy(%) | 第2类 | 0.74~0.81 | 0.78 | 0.03 | 6.902** |
第3类 | 0.59~0.88 | 0.75 | 0.09 | ||
第1类 | 0.72~0.96 | 0.87 | 0.06 | ||
发芽率Germination rate(%) | 第2类 | 0.75~0.84 | 0.80 | 0.04 | 10.03** |
第3类 | 0.61~0.88 | 0.77 | 0.09 | ||
第1类 | 28.72~38.8 | 34.35 | 2.54 | ||
发芽指数Germination index | 第2类 | 27.3~31.81 | 30.10 | 1.86 | 8.817** |
第3类 | 24.32~36.57 | 30.61 | 4.03 | ||
第1类 | 1208.68~2498.35 | 1946.05 | 261.38 | ||
活力指数vigor index | 第2类 | 459.25~890.47 | 667.28 | 154.15 | 52.972** |
第3类 | 505.64~1652.51 | 1322.37 | 360.9 | ||
简化种子活力指数 Simplified vigor inde | 第1类 | 30.36~62.31 | 49.36 | 6.66 | 54.298** |
[1] | 孙群, 王建华, 孙宝启. 种子活力的生理和遗传机理研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2007,(1):48-53. |
SUN Qun, WANG Jianhua, SUN Baoqi. Advances on Seed Vigor Physiological and Genetic Mechanisms[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2007,(1):48-53. | |
[2] |
Al-Amery M, Geneve R L, Sanches M F, et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy used to predict soybean seed germination and vigour[J]. Seed Science Research, 2018, 28:245-252.
DOI URL |
[3] |
Ellis R H. Seed and seedling vigour in relati on to crop growth and yield[J]. Plant Growth Regulation, 1992, 11(3):249-255.
DOI URL |
[4] | 马守才, 张改生, 王军卫, 等. 小麦种子活力性状的遗传变异和相关研究(英文)[J]. 西北植物学报, 2004,(9):1674-1679. |
MA Shoucai, ZHANG Gaisheng, WANG Junwei, et al. Genetic difference and interrelationship among seed vigor traits in wheat[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2004,(9):1674-1679. | |
[5] | 张艳芳, 吴凯铭, 刘光耀, 等. 不同收获期对小麦种子活力及物理性状的影响[J]. 种子, 2021, 40(8):1-7,14. |
ZHANG Yanfang, WU Kaiming, LIU Guanyao, et al. Effects of different time on vigor and physical characteristics of wheat seeds[J]. Seed, 2021, 40(8):1-7,14. | |
[6] | Fick G L, Hibbard R P. A method for determining seed viability by el ectri cal conductivity measurements[J]. Michigan Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters, 1925, 5: 95-103. |
[7] | Matthews S, Powell A A. Electrical conductivity vigour test: Physiological basis and use[J]. Seed Testing International, 2006, 131:32-35. |
[8] | 朱银, 颜伟, 杨欣, 等. 电导法测定小麦种子活力[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2014, 42(9):78-80. |
ZHU Yin, YAN Wei, YANG Xin, et al. Determination of wheatseed vigor by conductance method[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 42(9):78-80. | |
[9] | 郑雅潞, 薛小雁, 仇永康, 等. 小麦种子活力测定方法的比较[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(15):61-64. |
ZHENG Yalu, XUE Xiaoyan, QIU Yongkang, et al. Comparison of wheat seed vigor determination methods[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45(15):61-64. | |
[10] | 杨剑平, 唐玉林, 王文平. 小麦种子衰老的生理生化分析[J]. 种子, 1995,(2):13-14. |
YANG Jianping, TANG Yulin, WANG Wenping. Analysis of physiology and biochemistry for senescence of wheat seed[J]. Seed, 1995,(2):13-14. | |
[11] | 李富花, 李富利, 李富荣, 等. 燕麦种子活力测定方法[J]. 草业科学, 2013, 30(5):767-771. |
LI Fuhua, LI Fuli, LI Furong, et al. Study on testing methods of oat seed vigour[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2013, 30(5):767-771. | |
[12] | 冯魁, 贾永红, 李琼, 等. 春小麦新春31号种子活力与穗位和籽粒成熟度的关系[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2017, 37(6):808-814. |
FENG Kui, JIA Yonghong, LI Qiong, et al. Relationship between seed vigor of the sprin wheat Xinchun 31 and ear axis position and seed maturity[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2017, 37(6):808-814. | |
[13] | 刘旭欢, 加得拉·努尔兰, 贾永红, 等. 籽粒成熟度与穗部位置对春小麦种子活力的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2014, 23(10):71-75. |
LIU Xuhuan, Jiadela Nuerlan, JIA Yonghong, et al. Effects of maturity and head position on seed vigor of spring wheat[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2014, 23(10):71-75. | |
[14] | 周爱清, 罗顺. 种子活力[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1990. |
ZHOU Aiqing, LUO Shun. Seed Vigor[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1990. | |
[15] |
Mavi K, Mavi F, Demir I, et al. Electrical conductivity of seed soak water predicts seedling emergence and seed storage potential in commercial seed lots of radish[J]. Seed Science and Technology, 2014, 42(1):76-86.
DOI URL |
[16] | 余波, 杜尚广, 罗丽萍. 种子活力测定方法[J]. 中国科学:生命科学, 2015, 45:709-713. |
YU Bo, DU Shangguang, LUO Liping. Progress in determinations of seed vigor[J]. Scientia Sinica:Vitae, 2015, 45:709-713. | |
[17] |
Wang Y, Yu L, Nan Z, et al. Vigor tests used to rank seed lot quality and predict field emergence in four forage species[J]. Crop Science, 2004, 44(2):535-541.
DOI URL |
[18] | 郑成超, 邹琦, 程炳嵩. 大豆种子吸胀时内含物外渗及其与种子活力的相关性研究[J]. 大豆科学, 1991, 10(3):226-230. |
ZHENG Chenchao, ZOU Qi, CHENG Bingsong. Study on the exudation of inclusions during swelling of soybean seeds and its correlation with seed vigor[J]. Soybean Science, 1991, 10(3):226-230. | |
[19] | Larry O C, Copeland M, Miller B. Principles of Seed Science and Technology (3rd. Ed.)[M]. Springer, Boston, MA, 1999. |
[20] | 张红生. 种子学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015. |
ZHANG Hongsheng. Seed Scoience[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2015. | |
[21] | 曲宗普尺, 毛光锋, 吴敏, 等. 水稻种子浸泡液电导率与种子活力的关系[J/OL]. 中国农业科技导报:1-7[2022-05-30]. |
Quzongpuchi, WAO Guanfeng, WU Min, et al. Relationship Between Electrical Conductivity of Seed Soaking Solution and Seed Vigor in Rice(Oryza sativa L.)[J/OL]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology: 1-7[2022-05-30]. | |
[22] | 张文明, 倪安丽, 王昌初, 等. 杂交水稻及其双亲种子活力的研究[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 1997,(1):42-46. |
ZHANG Wenming, NI Anli, Wang Changchu, et al. Study on seed viability of hybrid rice and its two parents[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 1997,(1):42-46. | |
[23] | 卢新雄, 辛霞, 尹广鹍, 等. 中国作物种质资源安全保存理论与实践[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20(1):1-10. |
LU Xinxiong, XIN Xia, YIN Guangkun, et al. Theory and Practice of the Safe Conservation of Crop Germplasm Resources in China[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2019, 20(1):1-10. |
[1] | CHEN Chuanxin, ZHNAG Yongqiang, NIE Shihui, KONG Depeng, Sailihan Sai, XU Qijiang, LEI Junjie. Effects of biomass charcoal application rate on the growth, development, and yield of winter wheat under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2146-2151. |
[2] | WANG Lihong, ZHANG Hongzhi, ZHANG Yueqiang, LI Jianfeng, WANG Zhong, GAO Xin, SHI Jia, WANG Chunsheng, XIA Jianqiang, FAN Zheru. Analysis of dry matter production, transport and nitrogen fertilizer utilization caused by yield Gap at different yield levels of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2152-2162. |
[3] | WANG Xiaoyu, WANG Xiaoping, SHI Wenyu, LIU Meiyan, MA Jian, GUO Yunpeng, SONG Ruixin, WANG Qingtao. Responses of photosynthetic characteristics, dry matter accumulation and yield to drought stress in winter wheat at jointing stage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2163-2172. |
[4] | YANG Hongmei, ZHANG Yueqiang, SHI Yingwu, Omarjan Kurban, LIN Qing, WANG Ning, CHU Min, ZENG Jun. Effects of different types of foliar fertilizers on grain yield and 1uality of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2182-2188. |
[5] | DONG Yanxue, JIA Yonghong, ZHANG Jinshan, LI Dandan, WANG Kai, LUO Siwei, WANG Runqi, SHI Shubing. Effects of different ecological conditions on dry matter accumulation and yield of spring wheat varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1848-1857. |
[6] | FENG Mei, LIU Chaoqin, CHEN Jie, LIU Wenlong, YANG Zhigang, TIAN Jieying, HUANG Xin. Analysis of character variation and heterosis of F1 generation of different crosses in wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1858-1865. |
[7] | LI Huaisheng, AI Hongyu, MENG Ling, WANG Heya, ZHANG Lei, AI Haifeng. Effects of chasing rate during peak nutrient uptake of transport under n Reduction on spring wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1866-1872. |
[8] | ZHANG Yongqiang, CHEN Chuanxin, NIE Shihui, XU Qijiang, Sailihan Sai, LEI Junjie. Regulation of chlormequat on lodging resistance of winter wheat stem during the period of drip application of CCC [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1873-1878. |
[9] | YANG Jinyu, WANG Xihe, SUN Jiusheng. Effect of hydroponic culture on amino acid composition of whole plant barley and wheat seedlings and comparative analysis [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1589-1595. |
[10] | TIAN Wenqiang, DONG Yanxue, SHI Yongqing, LEI Junjie, SUN Ganggang, WANG Hongyi, NIE Lingfan, GOU Fei, AI Hongyu, SHI Shubing, ZHANG Jinshan. Effects of sowing date on stem traits and population dynamics of ultra late winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1301-1307. |
[11] | DONG Deyu, CHENG Yukun, WANG Rui, LEI Junjie, WANG Wei, CHEN Chuanxin, ZHENG Yongqiang, GENG Hongwei. Retrieval of wheat photosynthetic parameters at different growth stages based on UAV multispectral images [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1308-1318. |
[12] | ZHANG Yongqiang, CHEN Chuanxin, XU Qijiang, NIE Shihui, LEI Junjie, LIU Changwen. Effects of combined application of nitrogen enhancer and nitrogen reduction on leaf physiology and yield of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1319-1325. |
[13] | LAI Ning, GENG Qinglong, LI Yongfu, LI Na, XIN Huinan, BU Shengbing, CHEN Shuhuang. Effects of organic manure application combined with chemical fertilizer on yield, nitrogen, phosphorus uptake and utilization, and soil fertility of the extremely-late winter sown wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1335-1343. |
[14] | LUO Siwei, JIA Yonghong, ZHANG Jinshan, WANG Kai, LI Dandan, WANG Runqi, DONG Yanxue, SHI Shubing. Effects of drip irrigation capillary spacing and emitter spacing on the spatial distribution of soil water, root morphology and yield of uniformly sown winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1344-1352. |
[15] | WANG Xingzhou, SHI Xiaolei, ZHANG Heng, QU Kejia, GENG Hongwei, DING Sunlei, ZHANG Jinbo, YAN Yongliang. Identification and evaluation of salt tolerance at germination stage of introduced spring wheat varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1353-1362. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||