Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (4): 943-950.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.04.019
• Horticultural Special Local Products·Forestry·Facility Agriculture • Previous Articles Next Articles
DU Hongyan1,2(), PANG Shengqun1(), MA Haixiang1, JI Xuehua1
Received:
2022-07-06
Online:
2023-04-20
Published:
2023-05-06
Correspondence author:
PANG Shengqun(1970-), female, associate professor, master tutor, research direction: vegetable breeding, (E-mail)Supported by:
通讯作者:
庞胜群(1970-),女,安徽箫县人,副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为蔬菜育种,(E-mail)作者简介:
杜红艳(1994-),女,新疆石河子,硕士研究生,研究方向为园艺学,(E-mail)2419309914@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
DU Hongyan, PANG Shengqun, MA Haixiang, JI Xuehua. Correlation and path analysis of agronomic traits of processing tomato early maturity mutants[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 943-950.
杜红艳, 庞胜群, 马海翔, 吉雪花. 加工番茄早熟突变体农艺性状相关性及通径分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 943-950.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.04.019
品种名称 Cultivar | 单果重(g) Weight of single fruit | 熟性 Maturity |
---|---|---|
里格尔87-5 Rigel 87-5 | 53.52 | 早熟 |
里格尔87-5系1(TH11-2) Rigel 87-5 Series 1 (TH11-2) | 60.63 | 早熟 |
里格尔87-5系2(TY11-1) Rigel 87-5 Series 2(TY11-1) | 63.77 | 早熟 |
JW9 | 96.8 | 中熟 |
JW9系1(TH12-6) JW9 series 1 (TH12-6) | 98.73 | 早熟 |
JW9系2(TH12-7) JW9 series 2(TH12-7) | 101.42 | 早熟 |
Tab.1 Main characteristics of the tested materials
品种名称 Cultivar | 单果重(g) Weight of single fruit | 熟性 Maturity |
---|---|---|
里格尔87-5 Rigel 87-5 | 53.52 | 早熟 |
里格尔87-5系1(TH11-2) Rigel 87-5 Series 1 (TH11-2) | 60.63 | 早熟 |
里格尔87-5系2(TY11-1) Rigel 87-5 Series 2(TY11-1) | 63.77 | 早熟 |
JW9 | 96.8 | 中熟 |
JW9系1(TH12-6) JW9 series 1 (TH12-6) | 98.73 | 早熟 |
JW9系2(TH12-7) JW9 series 2(TH12-7) | 101.42 | 早熟 |
性状 Character | 里格尔87-5 Rigel 87-5 | TH11-2 | TY11-1 | JW9 | TH12-6 | TH12-7 | 平均值 Average value | 标准差 Standard deviation | 变异系数 Coefficient of Variation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 Plant height (cm, X1) | 36.07 | 37.09 | 43.68 | 48.43 | 50.05 | 52.94 | 44.79 | 8.11 | 0.181 |
叶面积 Leaf area (cm2, X2) | 21.20 | 23.00 | 27.99 | 33.17 | 33.08 | 31.18 | 28.27 | 5.166 | 0.183 |
茎粗 Stem thickness (mm, X3) | 11.85 | 12.79 | 12.22 | 11.58 | 11.55 | 12.36 | 11.71 | 1.17 | 0.100 |
始花节位 First flower node position (individual,X4) | 8.50 | 7.50 | 7.00 | 9.00 | 8.00 | 7.25 | 7.88 | 0.95 | 0.121 |
现蕾期 Budding period (d,X5) | 60.00 | 57.00 | 58.00 | 64.00 | 62.00 | 57.00 | 59.67 | 2.68 | 0.045 |
始花期 Initial flowering (d,X6) | 74.17 | 68.75 | 71.00 | 85.25 | 74.75 | 70.25 | 74.17 | 5.65 | 0.076 |
开花至成熟天数 Days from flowering to maturity (d,X7) | 47.00 | 42.00 | 43.75 | 51.00 | 47.75 | 42.75 | 45.70 | 3.86 | 0.084 |
果实横径 Fruit diameter (mm, X8) | 45.11 | 38.91 | 43.11 | 46.81 | 52.20 | 50.35 | 46.08 | 5.93 | 0.129 |
果实纵径 Fruit length (mm,X9) | 55.07 | 46.94 | 52.57 | 63.03 | 65.88 | 64.32 | 57.97 | 8.06 | 0.139 |
单果重 Single fruit weight (kg,X10) | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.291 |
一二穗果数 One or two ears of fruit (individual,X11) | 8.50 | 7.25 | 9.75 | 8.75 | 7.50 | 8.75 | 8.42 | 1.91 | 0.227 |
前期产量 Early production (kg,X12) | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.61 | 0.85 | 0.75 | 0.88 | 0.66 | 0.23 | 0.348 |
Tab.2 Descriptive statistical results of major agronomic traits of the early tomato mutant
性状 Character | 里格尔87-5 Rigel 87-5 | TH11-2 | TY11-1 | JW9 | TH12-6 | TH12-7 | 平均值 Average value | 标准差 Standard deviation | 变异系数 Coefficient of Variation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 Plant height (cm, X1) | 36.07 | 37.09 | 43.68 | 48.43 | 50.05 | 52.94 | 44.79 | 8.11 | 0.181 |
叶面积 Leaf area (cm2, X2) | 21.20 | 23.00 | 27.99 | 33.17 | 33.08 | 31.18 | 28.27 | 5.166 | 0.183 |
茎粗 Stem thickness (mm, X3) | 11.85 | 12.79 | 12.22 | 11.58 | 11.55 | 12.36 | 11.71 | 1.17 | 0.100 |
始花节位 First flower node position (individual,X4) | 8.50 | 7.50 | 7.00 | 9.00 | 8.00 | 7.25 | 7.88 | 0.95 | 0.121 |
现蕾期 Budding period (d,X5) | 60.00 | 57.00 | 58.00 | 64.00 | 62.00 | 57.00 | 59.67 | 2.68 | 0.045 |
始花期 Initial flowering (d,X6) | 74.17 | 68.75 | 71.00 | 85.25 | 74.75 | 70.25 | 74.17 | 5.65 | 0.076 |
开花至成熟天数 Days from flowering to maturity (d,X7) | 47.00 | 42.00 | 43.75 | 51.00 | 47.75 | 42.75 | 45.70 | 3.86 | 0.084 |
果实横径 Fruit diameter (mm, X8) | 45.11 | 38.91 | 43.11 | 46.81 | 52.20 | 50.35 | 46.08 | 5.93 | 0.129 |
果实纵径 Fruit length (mm,X9) | 55.07 | 46.94 | 52.57 | 63.03 | 65.88 | 64.32 | 57.97 | 8.06 | 0.139 |
单果重 Single fruit weight (kg,X10) | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.291 |
一二穗果数 One or two ears of fruit (individual,X11) | 8.50 | 7.25 | 9.75 | 8.75 | 7.50 | 8.75 | 8.42 | 1.91 | 0.227 |
前期产量 Early production (kg,X12) | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.61 | 0.85 | 0.75 | 0.88 | 0.66 | 0.23 | 0.348 |
参数 Parameter | 处理组 Treatment group | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 | X11 | X12 | ||
对照组 Control group | X1 | 0.128 | 0.334* | 0.301 | 0.412 | 0.500* | 0.375 | 0.527* | 0.700** | 0.736** | 0.653** | 0.682** | |
X2 | -0.242 | 0.055 | 0.078 | -0.314 | -0.091 | -0.319 | 0.173 | 0.101 | -0.078 | 0.552* | 0.465 | ||
X3 | 0.4 | 0.325 | 0.225 | 0.358 | 0.49 | 0.526* | 0.635** | 0.602** | 0.382 | 0.557* | 0.532* | ||
X4 | 0.644 | -0.295 | 0.743* | 0.550* | 0.780** | 0.4 | 0.365 | 0.428 | 0.107 | 0.14 | 0.213 | ||
X5 | 0.850** | -0.561 | 0.678 | 0.577 | 0.891** | 0.922** | 0.341 | 0.452 | 0.363 | 0.011 | 0.135 | ||
X6 | 0.904** | -0.632 | 0.636 | 0.601 | 0.991** | 0.822** | 0.462 | 0.593* | 0.341 | 0.249 | 0.323 | ||
X7 | 0.906** | -0.628 | 0.639 | 0.646 | 0.987** | 0.995** | 0.444 | 0.576* | 0.496 | 0.113 | 0.236 | ||
X8 | -0.27 | 0.119 | -0.201 | -0.592 | -0.441 | -0.449 | -0.487 | 0.818** | 0.47 | 0.489 | 0.540* | ||
X9 | -0.585 | 0.474 | -0.228 | -0.559 | -0.764* | -0.768* | -0.811* | 0.783** | 0.799** | 0.675** | 0.782** | ||
X10 | 0.811* | -0.481 | 0.659 | 0.498 | 0.976** | 0.968** | 0.956** | -0.405 | -0.71 | 0.632** | 0.770** | ||
X11 | 0.551 | -0.191 | 0.396 | 0.646 | 0.43 | 0.474 | 0.515 | -0.602 | -0.557 | 0.506 | 0.958** | ||
X12 | 0.793* | -0.383 | 0.619 | 0.688 | 0.848** | 0.868** | 0.884** | -0.609 | -0.77 | 0.892** | 0.822* |
Tab.3 Correlation coefficient among agronomic traits
参数 Parameter | 处理组 Treatment group | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 | X11 | X12 | ||
对照组 Control group | X1 | 0.128 | 0.334* | 0.301 | 0.412 | 0.500* | 0.375 | 0.527* | 0.700** | 0.736** | 0.653** | 0.682** | |
X2 | -0.242 | 0.055 | 0.078 | -0.314 | -0.091 | -0.319 | 0.173 | 0.101 | -0.078 | 0.552* | 0.465 | ||
X3 | 0.4 | 0.325 | 0.225 | 0.358 | 0.49 | 0.526* | 0.635** | 0.602** | 0.382 | 0.557* | 0.532* | ||
X4 | 0.644 | -0.295 | 0.743* | 0.550* | 0.780** | 0.4 | 0.365 | 0.428 | 0.107 | 0.14 | 0.213 | ||
X5 | 0.850** | -0.561 | 0.678 | 0.577 | 0.891** | 0.922** | 0.341 | 0.452 | 0.363 | 0.011 | 0.135 | ||
X6 | 0.904** | -0.632 | 0.636 | 0.601 | 0.991** | 0.822** | 0.462 | 0.593* | 0.341 | 0.249 | 0.323 | ||
X7 | 0.906** | -0.628 | 0.639 | 0.646 | 0.987** | 0.995** | 0.444 | 0.576* | 0.496 | 0.113 | 0.236 | ||
X8 | -0.27 | 0.119 | -0.201 | -0.592 | -0.441 | -0.449 | -0.487 | 0.818** | 0.47 | 0.489 | 0.540* | ||
X9 | -0.585 | 0.474 | -0.228 | -0.559 | -0.764* | -0.768* | -0.811* | 0.783** | 0.799** | 0.675** | 0.782** | ||
X10 | 0.811* | -0.481 | 0.659 | 0.498 | 0.976** | 0.968** | 0.956** | -0.405 | -0.71 | 0.632** | 0.770** | ||
X11 | 0.551 | -0.191 | 0.396 | 0.646 | 0.43 | 0.474 | 0.515 | -0.602 | -0.557 | 0.506 | 0.958** | ||
X12 | 0.793* | -0.383 | 0.619 | 0.688 | 0.848** | 0.868** | 0.884** | -0.609 | -0.77 | 0.892** | 0.822* |
性状 Character | 早熟性指数 Precocity index | 始花节位 First flower node | 现蕾期 Budding period | 始花期 Initial flowering | 开花至成熟 天数 Days from flowering to maturity | 单果重 Single fruit weight | 一二穗果数 One or two ears of fruit | 前期产量 Early production |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
早熟性指数 Precocity index | 1 | -0.1980 | -0.358 | -0.209 | -0.306 | 0.457* | 0.590** | 0.723** |
始花节位 First flower node | -0.198 | 1 | 0.651** | 0.671** | 0.572** | 0.18 | 0.006 | 0.202 |
现蕾期 Budding period | -0.358 | 0.651** | 1 | 0.917** | 0.876** | 0.361 | -0.023 | 0.314 |
始花期 Initial flowering | -0.209 | 0.671** | 0.917** | 1 | 0.888** | 0.294 | 0.122 | 0.354 |
开花至成熟天数 Days from flowering to maturity | -0.306 | 0.572** | 0.876** | 0.888** | 1 | 0.224 | 0.082 | 0.265 |
单果重 Single fruit weight | 0.457* | 0.18 | 0.361 0 | 0.294 | 0.224 | 1 | -0.067 | 0.822** |
一二穗果数 One or two ears of fruit | 0.590** | 0.006 0 | -0.023 | 0.122 | 0.082 | -0.067 | 1 | 0.492* |
前期产量 Early production | 0.723** | 0.202 0 | 0.314 | 0.354 | 0.265 | 0.822** | 0.492* | 1 |
Tab.4 Correlation analysis between components of early maturation of processing tomatoes precocious mutant
性状 Character | 早熟性指数 Precocity index | 始花节位 First flower node | 现蕾期 Budding period | 始花期 Initial flowering | 开花至成熟 天数 Days from flowering to maturity | 单果重 Single fruit weight | 一二穗果数 One or two ears of fruit | 前期产量 Early production |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
早熟性指数 Precocity index | 1 | -0.1980 | -0.358 | -0.209 | -0.306 | 0.457* | 0.590** | 0.723** |
始花节位 First flower node | -0.198 | 1 | 0.651** | 0.671** | 0.572** | 0.18 | 0.006 | 0.202 |
现蕾期 Budding period | -0.358 | 0.651** | 1 | 0.917** | 0.876** | 0.361 | -0.023 | 0.314 |
始花期 Initial flowering | -0.209 | 0.671** | 0.917** | 1 | 0.888** | 0.294 | 0.122 | 0.354 |
开花至成熟天数 Days from flowering to maturity | -0.306 | 0.572** | 0.876** | 0.888** | 1 | 0.224 | 0.082 | 0.265 |
单果重 Single fruit weight | 0.457* | 0.18 | 0.361 0 | 0.294 | 0.224 | 1 | -0.067 | 0.822** |
一二穗果数 One or two ears of fruit | 0.590** | 0.006 0 | -0.023 | 0.122 | 0.082 | -0.067 | 1 | 0.492* |
前期产量 Early production | 0.723** | 0.202 0 | 0.314 | 0.354 | 0.265 | 0.822** | 0.492* | 1 |
偏相关系数 Partial correlation coefficient | t检验值 t test value | 显著性水平P Significance level P | 方程 Equation |
---|---|---|---|
r(Y,X1)=-0.084 | -0.001 | 0.999 0 | 相关系数R=0.990,F值=65.482 |
r(Y,X10)=0.819 | 5.253 | 0.006 0 | 显著水平P=0.001,调整后的相关系数Ra=0.965 |
r(Y,X11)=0.669 | 5.851 | 0.004 0 | Durbin-Watson统计量 d=2.576 |
Tab.5 Control group regression model diagnosis
偏相关系数 Partial correlation coefficient | t检验值 t test value | 显著性水平P Significance level P | 方程 Equation |
---|---|---|---|
r(Y,X1)=-0.084 | -0.001 | 0.999 0 | 相关系数R=0.990,F值=65.482 |
r(Y,X10)=0.819 | 5.253 | 0.006 0 | 显著水平P=0.001,调整后的相关系数Ra=0.965 |
r(Y,X11)=0.669 | 5.851 | 0.004 0 | Durbin-Watson统计量 d=2.576 |
偏相关系数 Partial correlation coefficient | t检验值 t test value | 显著性水平P Significance level P | 方程 Equation |
---|---|---|---|
r(Y,X1)=0.252 | -0.904 | 0.384 0 | 相关系数R=0.982,F值=108.224 |
r(Y,X10)=0.734 | 3.743 | 0.003 0 | 显著水平P=0.000,调整后的相关系数Ra=0.955 |
r(Y,X11)=0.952 | 10.739 | 0.000 0 | Durbin-Watson统计量 d=2.181 |
Tab.6 Treatment group regression model diagnosis
偏相关系数 Partial correlation coefficient | t检验值 t test value | 显著性水平P Significance level P | 方程 Equation |
---|---|---|---|
r(Y,X1)=0.252 | -0.904 | 0.384 0 | 相关系数R=0.982,F值=108.224 |
r(Y,X10)=0.734 | 3.743 | 0.003 0 | 显著水平P=0.000,调整后的相关系数Ra=0.955 |
r(Y,X11)=0.952 | 10.739 | 0.000 0 | Durbin-Watson统计量 d=2.181 |
自变量 Independent variable | 与Y的简单 相关系数 Simple correlation coefficient with Y | 通径系数 (直接作用) Path coefficient (Direct action) | 间接通径系数 (间接作用) Indirect diameter coefficient (indirect action) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
X10 | X11 | |||
X10 | 0.905 | 0.639 | 0.323 3 | |
X11 | 0.705 | 0.499 | 0.252 |
Tab.7 Path analysis of main agronomic traits and early yield
自变量 Independent variable | 与Y的简单 相关系数 Simple correlation coefficient with Y | 通径系数 (直接作用) Path coefficient (Direct action) | 间接通径系数 (间接作用) Indirect diameter coefficient (indirect action) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
X10 | X11 | |||
X10 | 0.905 | 0.639 | 0.323 3 | |
X11 | 0.705 | 0.499 | 0.252 |
自变量 Independent variable | 与Y的简单 相关系数 Simple correlation coefficient with Y | 通径系数 (直接作用) Path coefficient (Direct action) | 间接通径系数 (间接作用) Indirect diameter coefficient (indirect action) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
X10 | X11 | |||
X10 | 0.77 | 0.316 | 0.511 3 | |
X11 | 0.958 | 0.809 | 0.199 7 |
Tab.8 Path analysis of main agronomic traits and early yield
自变量 Independent variable | 与Y的简单 相关系数 Simple correlation coefficient with Y | 通径系数 (直接作用) Path coefficient (Direct action) | 间接通径系数 (间接作用) Indirect diameter coefficient (indirect action) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
X10 | X11 | |||
X10 | 0.77 | 0.316 | 0.511 3 | |
X11 | 0.958 | 0.809 | 0.199 7 |
[1] | 徐鹤林, 李景富. 中国番茄[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2007. |
XU Helin, LI Jingfu. China Tomato[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2007. | |
[2] | 单淑玲. 加工番茄花药培养愈伤组织诱导和分化研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2019. |
SHAN Shu Ling. Study on Induction and Differentiation of Processed Tomato Anther Culture Callus[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2019. | |
[3] | 李凯, 谭丹. 新疆番茄产业国际竞争力分析[J]. 现代商业, 2018,(35):65-68. |
LI Kai, TAN Dan. Analysis on the International Competitiveness of Xinjiang Tomato Industry[J]. Modern Business, 2018,(35):65-68. | |
[4] | 刘晓坤. 多目标加工番茄种植规划研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆大学, 2019. |
LIU Xiaokun. Research on Planting Planning of Multi-Object Processing Tomato[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang University, 2019. | |
[5] | 刘超. 新疆番茄加工产业的现状及发展前景分析[J]. 现代食品, 2018,(13):4-5, 9. |
LIU Chao. Analysis of the status quo and development prospects of Xinjiang tomato processing industry[J]. Modern Food, 2018,(13):4-5, 9. | |
[6] | 李守明, 王建江, 王诚军, 等. 2013. 我国加工番茄产业发展中的技术瓶颈与对策[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2013,(7):6-8. |
LI Shouming, WANG Jianjiang, WANG Chengjun, et al. Technical bottlenecks and countermeasures in the development of my country's processing tomato industry[J]. China Vegetables, 2013,(7): 6-8. | |
[7] | 李荣霞, 刘伟, 张爱萍. 早熟加工番茄新品种新番72号的选育[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2017,(1):66-68. |
LI Rongxia, LIU Wei, ZHANG Aiping. The breeding of a new early-maturing tomato variety Xinfan 72[J]. China Vegetables, 2017,(1):66-68. | |
[8] | 洪伟, 马野平, 张军, 等. 早熟加工番茄新品种新番71号的选育[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2016,(12):72-74. |
HONG Wei, MA Yeping, ZHANG Jun, et al. The breeding of a new early-maturing tomato variety Xinfan 71[J]. China Vegetables, 2016,(12):72-74. | |
[9] | 刘磊, 李君明, 郑峥, 等. 早熟加工番茄新品种IVF1305的选育[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2018,(6):70-73. |
LIU Lei, LI Junming, ZHENG Zheng, et al. The breeding of a new early-maturing tomato variety IVF1305[J]. China Vegetables, 2018,(6):70-73. | |
[10] | 周长海, 潘凤英, 肖人鹏, 等. 扬稻6号早熟突变体扬6早的特征特性鉴定[J]. 南方农业学报, 2013, 44(11):1800-1805. |
ZHOU Changhai, PAN Fengying, XIAO Renpeng, et al. Characteristics identification of early maturity mutant Yangdao 6[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2013, 44(11):1800-1805. | |
[11] |
Serrat X, Esteban Roger, Guibourt N, et al. EMS mutagenesis in mature seed-derived rice calli as a new method for rapidly obtaining TILLING mutant populations[J]. Plant Methods, 2014, 10:5(3): 467-475.
DOI URL |
[12] | 张晓勤, 薛大伟, 周伟辉, 等. 用甲基磺酸乙酯(EMS)诱变的大麦浙农的3号突变体的筛选和鉴定[J]. 浙江大学学报, 2011, 37(2):37-52. |
ZHANG Xiaoqin, XUE Dawei, ZHUO Weihui, et al. Screening and identification of No. 3 mutant of barley Zhenong mutagenized with ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS)[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University, 2011, 37(2):37-52. | |
[13] |
佟星, 赵波, 金文林, 等. 理化诱变小豆京农 6 号突变体的鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36 (4):565-573.
DOI |
TONG Xing, ZHAO Bo, JIN Wenlin, et al. 2010. Identification of Mutants from Azuki Bean (Vigna angularisi) Jingnong 6 Seed Induced by Physical and Chemical Agents[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010, 36(4): 565-573.
DOI |
|
[14] | Shiwa Y, Fukushima-Tanaka S, Kasahara K, et al. Whole-Genome Profiling of a Novel Mutagenesis Technique Using Proofreading-Deficient DNA Polymerase δ[J]. International Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2012, 2012(1):860797. |
[15] |
Sabetta W, Alba V, Blanco A, et al. sunTILL: a TILLING re-source for gene function analysis in sunflower[J]. Plant Methods, 2011, 7(1):20-20.
DOI PMID |
[16] | 卢银, 刘梦洋, 赵建军, 等. 大白菜突变体库的构建及 M 2 叶片表型变异的研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2014, 41(8):1609-1619. |
LU Yin, LIU Mengyang, ZHAO Jiianjun, et al. Construction of Chinese Cabbage Mutant Library and Study on Phenotypic Variation of M 2 Leaves[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2014, 41(8):1609-1619. | |
[17] |
刘根忠, 王云飞, 孟祥飞, 等. EMS诱变的‘里格尔87-5’番茄M2群体突变体表型及其抗坏血酸研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2017, 44(1):120-130.
DOI |
LIU Genzhong, WANG Yunfei, MENG Xiangfei, et al. Study on the phenotype and ascorbic acid of'Riger 87-5' tomato M2 population mutant induced by EMS[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2017, 44(1):120-130.
DOI |
|
[18] | 张萍, 姜景彬, 杨欢欢, 等. 番茄EMS突变体库的构建及表型分析[J]. 北方园艺, 2019,(7):1-9. |
ZHANG Ping, JIANG Jingbin, YANG Huabhuan, et al. Construction and phenotype analysis of tomato EMS mutant library[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2019,(7):1-9. | |
[19] | 尚娜. EMS诱变番茄突变体库的构建及表型分析[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2017. |
SHANG Na. Construction and phenotype analysis of tomato mutant library induced by EMS[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2017. | |
[20] | 余庆辉, 张勇, 杨生保, 等. 加工番茄叶片与产量的相关性及叶内生理性酶活性比较分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2007, 44(3):259-263. |
YU Qinghui, ZHANG Yong, YANG Shengbao, et al. The correlation between processed tomato leaves and yield and comparative analysis of physiological enzyme activities in leaves[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 44(3):259-263. | |
[21] | 王永飞, 王鸣, 王雷, 等. 加工番茄丰产性状和品质性状的典型相关分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 1999, 32(1):20-25. |
Wang Yongfei, WANG Ming, WANG Lei, et al. Canonical correlation analysis of high-yield traits and quality traits of processed tomato[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 1999, 32(1): 20-25. | |
[22] |
武路广, 霍梅俊, 刘思奇, 等. 白羊草干草产量与主要农艺性状的多元回归及通径分析[J]. 草地学报, 2013, 21(4):697-701.
DOI |
WU Luguang, HUO Meijun, LIU Siqi, et al. Multivariate regression and path analysis of hay yield and main agronomic traits of White Leymus chinensis[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2013, 21(4): 697-701. | |
[23] | 杜家菊, 陈志伟. 使用SPSS线性回归实现通径分析的方法[J]. 生物学通报, 2010, 45(2):4-6. |
DU Jiaju, CHEN Zhiwei. A method of path analysis using SPSS linear regression[J]. Bulletin of Biology, 2010, 45(2):4-6. | |
[24] | 庞胜群, 郑群, 辛建华, 等. 加工番茄主要农艺性状与产量的相关及通径分析[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2010,(22):26-28. |
PANG Shengqun, ZHENG Qun, XIN Jianhua, et al. Correlation and Path Analysis of the Main Agronomic Characters and Yield of Processing Tomato[J]. Journal of Changjiang Vegetables, 2010,(22):26-28. | |
[25] | 贾晓军, 陈芳, 兰创业. 鲜食番茄农艺性状和产量的相关性分析[J]. 北方园艺, 2017,(5):27-30. |
JIA Xiaojun, CHEN Fang, LAN Chuangye. Correlation Analysis of Agronomic Characters and Yield of Fresh Tomato[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2017,(5):27-30. | |
[26] | 杨荣昌, 徐鹤林. 番茄早熟性构成及遗传相关分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 1992,(2):48-50. |
YANG Rongchang, XU Helin. The composition and genetic correlation analysis of tomato early maturity[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 1992,(2):48-50. | |
[27] | 明道绪. 通径分析[M]. 雅安: 四川农业大学学报编辑部, 1990. |
MING Daoxu. Path analysis[M]. Ya'an: Editorial Department of Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 1990. |
[1] | WANG Peng, ZHENG Kai, ZHAO Jieyin, GAO Wenju, LONG Yilei, CHEN Quanjia, QU Yanying. Evaluation and index screening of heat resistance of Gossypium hirsutum germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2081-2090. |
[2] | PU Min, RUAN Xiangyang, XIAO Lele, SUO Changkai, CHEN Guoyong, YE Jun, GAO Bo. Effect of citric acid soluble calcium magnesium fertilizer on calcium and magnesium absorption and quality of processing tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1987-1995. |
[3] | WANG Ting, ZHANG Li, ZHANG Fanfan, HUANG Rongzheng, LI Xiao, ZHANG Yulin, CHEN Yongcheng, ZHAO Jiantao, MA Chunhui. Poduction performance screening and nutritional value evaluation of corn varieties suitable for silage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1596-1605. |
[4] | SHI Xiaolei, DING Sunlei, CONG Hua, ZHANG Jinbo, QU Kejia, WANG Xingzhou, HAN dai, YAN Yongliang. Gray correlation analysis of reast soybean yield correlation traits [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1641-1652. |
[5] | YAN Yongliang, ZHANG Heng, QU Kejia, SHI Xiaolei, WANG Xingzhou, ZHANG Jinbo, CONG Hua. Comparative study on the agronomic traits and yields of different soybean varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1653-1662. |
[6] | ZHAO Lianjia, LI Gan, XU Lin, YAN Guorong, LIU Ning, WANG Fan, DENG Chaohong, Abudukeyoumu Abudurezike, WANG Cong, WANG Wei. Analysis of the main characters of soybean varieties in Xinjiang and their correlation with yield [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1663-1670. |
[7] | HUANG Qiannan, Maerheba Aisibaier, ZOU Hui, WANG Cairong, Ailimaimaiti Kuerban, SUN Na, LEI Junjie. Genetic diversity of main agronomic traits in Xinjiang winter wheat germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1050-1058. |
[8] | SANG Zhiwei, LIANG Yajun, GONG Zhaolong, ZHENG Juyun, WANG Junduo, LI Xueyuan, CHEN Quanjia. Analysis of mechanical harvesting characters of germplasm resources of different upland cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1088-1098. |
[9] | LU Tao, ZENG Qingtao, ZHANG Wen, WANG Wenbo, WANG Zhengyang, YANG Rui, SUN Yuyan. Comprehensive evaluation of cotton yield and quality by principal component analysis and grey correlation analysis [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1099-1109. |
[10] | LI Shuo, WANG Juan, Nigary Yadikar, ZHU Jinfang, FENG Zuoshan, Parhat Ainiwaer. Functional components changes of different apricot cultivars in different development stages [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1200-1207. |
[11] | DONG Xiuli, HAN Dengxu, YANG Jie, Abuleti Abula, DAI Aimei, LI Junjie, WANG Yejian, LIU Jun, XI Haojiang, LIANG Xiaoling, LI Mingdong. Comprehensive analysis of main agronomic traits of maize [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 865-871. |
[12] | HAO Xiyu, YANG Tao, ZHANG Junjie, LI Xue, ZHANG Zhongjuan, WU Chenqing, ZONG Xuxiao, LENG Youbin, CHEN Bo, GUO Laichun. Effects of Different Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Treatments on Yield, Agronomic Traits and Economic Benefit of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(3): 555-566. |
[13] | Alibieligen Hazitai, Hanipa Hazaisi, Zulehumaer Wusimanjiang, YAO Qing, Shouhereti Yodika, HOU Xanfei, LI Qiang, ZHANG Zheng. Adaptability Analysis of Introduced Soybean Varieties in Yili Valley of Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 326-335. |
[14] | MA Xu, ZHAO Ying, HAN Wei, WU Shengli, HAN Xiaoyan. Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis of Amino Acids in Seabuckthorn Fruit [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 378-388. |
[15] | HOU Zhixiong, JING Changqing, CHEN Chen, WANG Gongxin, GUO Wenzhang, ZHAO Weikang. Spatiotemporal Variation of Vegetation Coverage of Natural Grassland in Northern Xinjiang in Recent 20 Years and Its Relationship with Meteorological Factors [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 464-471. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||