Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (8): 1987-1995.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.08.020
• Plant Protection · Microbes • Previous Articles Next Articles
PU Min1(), RUAN Xiangyang1, XIAO Lele1, SUO Changkai1, CHEN Guoyong1, YE Jun1(), GAO Bo2
Received:
2022-10-30
Online:
2023-08-20
Published:
2023-08-14
Correspondence author:
YE Jun (1974-), male, professor, research direction: new fertilizer and modern fertilization technology,(E-mail)yejun.shz@163.comSupported by:
蒲敏1(), 阮向阳1, 肖乐乐1, 索常凯1, 陈国永1, 冶军1(), 高波2
通讯作者:
冶军(1974-),男,教授,研究方向为新型肥料与现代施肥,(E-mail)yejun.shz@163.com作者简介:
蒲敏(1998-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为新型肥料与现代施肥,(E-mail)pumin2020@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
PU Min, RUAN Xiangyang, XIAO Lele, SUO Changkai, CHEN Guoyong, YE Jun, GAO Bo. Effect of citric acid soluble calcium magnesium fertilizer on calcium and magnesium absorption and quality of processing tomato[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1987-1995.
蒲敏, 阮向阳, 肖乐乐, 索常凯, 陈国永, 冶军, 高波. 枸溶性钙镁肥对加工番茄钙、镁吸收及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1987-1995.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.08.020
Fig.1 Effect of citric acid soluble calcium magnesium fertilizer on magnesium absorption of fruit Note: The different letters on the graph indicate significant differences between different treatments during the same period (P <0.05),the same as below
生育期(天数) Growth period (days) | 处理 Treat- ment | 吸收速率 Absorption rate (kg/(hm2·d)) | 吸收比例 Absorption ratio Ca∶Mg | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ca | Mg | |||
开花期-坐果初期 Flowering stage - Early fruiting stage (30 d) | CK | 0.130c | 0.024c | 5.3∶1 |
C450 | 0.142c | 0.028bc | 5.0∶1 | |
C900 | 0.168b | 0.035b | 4.9∶1 | |
C1 800 | 0.193a | 0.040a | 4.8∶1 | |
坐果初期-坐果后期 Early fruiting stage - Late fruiting stage (28 d) | CK | 0.144d | 0.037b | 3.9∶1 |
C450 | 0.172c | 0.036b | 4.8∶1 | |
C900 | 0.210b | 0.056a | 3.8∶1 | |
C1 800 | 0.215a | 0.061a | 3.5∶1 | |
坐果后期-成熟期 Late fruiting stage - mature stage (40 d) | CK | 0.118c | 0.040c | 3.0∶1 |
C450 | 0.139b | 0.051b | 2.7∶1 | |
C900 | 0.143b | 0.058a | 2.5∶1 | |
C1 800 | 0.162a | 0.059a | 2.7∶1 |
Tab.1 Absorption characteristics of calcium and magnesium in fruits at different growth stages
生育期(天数) Growth period (days) | 处理 Treat- ment | 吸收速率 Absorption rate (kg/(hm2·d)) | 吸收比例 Absorption ratio Ca∶Mg | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ca | Mg | |||
开花期-坐果初期 Flowering stage - Early fruiting stage (30 d) | CK | 0.130c | 0.024c | 5.3∶1 |
C450 | 0.142c | 0.028bc | 5.0∶1 | |
C900 | 0.168b | 0.035b | 4.9∶1 | |
C1 800 | 0.193a | 0.040a | 4.8∶1 | |
坐果初期-坐果后期 Early fruiting stage - Late fruiting stage (28 d) | CK | 0.144d | 0.037b | 3.9∶1 |
C450 | 0.172c | 0.036b | 4.8∶1 | |
C900 | 0.210b | 0.056a | 3.8∶1 | |
C1 800 | 0.215a | 0.061a | 3.5∶1 | |
坐果后期-成熟期 Late fruiting stage - mature stage (40 d) | CK | 0.118c | 0.040c | 3.0∶1 |
C450 | 0.139b | 0.051b | 2.7∶1 | |
C900 | 0.143b | 0.058a | 2.5∶1 | |
C1 800 | 0.162a | 0.059a | 2.7∶1 |
处理 Treat- ment | 单果重 Single fruit weight (g) | 果形指数 Fruit shape index | 横径×纵径 Transverse diameter× vertical diameter (cm×cm) | 颜色指数 (CI) Color index | 心室数 (个) Number of ventr icular |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 40.22b | 1.40a | 25.68b | 33.95b | 2b |
C450 | 49.07a | 1.38a | 29.67a | 35.29ab | 3a |
C900 | 48.48a | 1.41a | 29.42a | 36.82a | 3a |
C1 800 | 47.16a | 1.31b | 26.02b | 36.85a | 3a |
Tab.2 Effects of different application rates on the appearance quality of processing tomato fruit
处理 Treat- ment | 单果重 Single fruit weight (g) | 果形指数 Fruit shape index | 横径×纵径 Transverse diameter× vertical diameter (cm×cm) | 颜色指数 (CI) Color index | 心室数 (个) Number of ventr icular |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 40.22b | 1.40a | 25.68b | 33.95b | 2b |
C450 | 49.07a | 1.38a | 29.67a | 35.29ab | 3a |
C900 | 48.48a | 1.41a | 29.42a | 36.82a | 3a |
C1 800 | 47.16a | 1.31b | 26.02b | 36.85a | 3a |
处理 Treat- ment | 硬度 Hardness (kg/cm2) | 可溶性 固形 Soluble solids (%) | 可溶 性糖 Soluble sugar (%) | 可滴 定酸 Titra table acid (%) | 糖酸比 Sugar acid ratio | 果肉 厚度 Pulp thich ness (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 1.12a | 4.07a | 1.50c | 0.32b | 4.69b | 0.61c |
C450 | 1.16a | 4.33a | 1.57c | 0.38a | 4.16b | 0.72b |
C900 | 1.13a | 4.07a | 1.88b | 0.37a | 5.07b | 0.73b |
C1 800 | 1.13a | 4.37a | 2.43a | 0.33b | 7.27a | 0.79a |
Tab.3 Effects of different application rates on taste quality of processing tomato fruit
处理 Treat- ment | 硬度 Hardness (kg/cm2) | 可溶性 固形 Soluble solids (%) | 可溶 性糖 Soluble sugar (%) | 可滴 定酸 Titra table acid (%) | 糖酸比 Sugar acid ratio | 果肉 厚度 Pulp thich ness (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 1.12a | 4.07a | 1.50c | 0.32b | 4.69b | 0.61c |
C450 | 1.16a | 4.33a | 1.57c | 0.38a | 4.16b | 0.72b |
C900 | 1.13a | 4.07a | 1.88b | 0.37a | 5.07b | 0.73b |
C1 800 | 1.13a | 4.37a | 2.43a | 0.33b | 7.27a | 0.79a |
处理 Treat- ment | VC Vitamin C (mg/100g) | 番茄红素 Lycopene (mg/kg) | 硝酸盐 Nitrate nitrogen (mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 20.73b | 15.51ab | 160.66a |
C450 | 18.73c | 13.81b | 120.12b |
C900 | 19.70bc | 17.53a | 114.36b |
C1 800 | 24.64a | 17.51a | 93.63c |
Tab.4 Effects of different application rates on nutritional quality of processing tomato fruit
处理 Treat- ment | VC Vitamin C (mg/100g) | 番茄红素 Lycopene (mg/kg) | 硝酸盐 Nitrate nitrogen (mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 20.73b | 15.51ab | 160.66a |
C450 | 18.73c | 13.81b | 120.12b |
C900 | 19.70bc | 17.53a | 114.36b |
C1 800 | 24.64a | 17.51a | 93.63c |
主成分 Principle component | 特征值 Eigen value | 贡献率 Contribution rate (%) | 累积贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate(%) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 6.38 | 45.58 | 45.58 |
2 | 2.94 | 20.98 | 66.56 |
3 | 2.01 | 14.37 | 80.93 |
4 | 1.11 | 7.92 | 88.85 |
Tab.5 Eigenvalue and contribution rate of principal components
主成分 Principle component | 特征值 Eigen value | 贡献率 Contribution rate (%) | 累积贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate(%) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 6.38 | 45.58 | 45.58 |
2 | 2.94 | 20.98 | 66.56 |
3 | 2.01 | 14.37 | 80.93 |
4 | 1.11 | 7.92 | 88.85 |
指标 Index | 主成分(Component) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
单果重 Single fruit weight | -0.005 | 0.98 | -0.097 | -0.033 |
横径×纵径 Transverse diameter ×vertical diameter | -0.497 | 0.617 | 0.422 | -0.006 |
果形指数 Fruit shape index | -0.724 | -0.355 | 0.079 | 0.506 |
硝酸盐 Nitrate nitrogen | -0.572 | -0.592 | -0.101 | -0.459 |
VC | 0.958 | -0.14 | 0.155 | -0.02 |
可滴定酸 Titratable acid | 0.889 | 0.303 | 0.102 | 0.26 |
可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | 0.887 | 0.272 | 0.015 | 0.292 |
糖酸比 Sugar acid ratio | 0.93 | 0.031 | 0.029 | 0.237 |
番茄红素 Lycopene | 0.538 | -0.017 | -0.54 | 0.47 |
硬度 Hardness | 0.005 | 0.004 | 0.893 | 0.042 |
可溶性固形物 Soluble solids | 0.37 | 0.189 | 0.835 | -0.075 |
颜色指数 Color index | 0.212 | 0.343 | -0.041 | 0.785 |
心室数 Number of ventricular | 0.197 | 0.9 | 0.127 | 0.325 |
果肉厚度 Pulp thickness | 0.484 | 0.73 | 0.239 | 0.173 |
Tab.6 The Rotated component matrix
指标 Index | 主成分(Component) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
单果重 Single fruit weight | -0.005 | 0.98 | -0.097 | -0.033 |
横径×纵径 Transverse diameter ×vertical diameter | -0.497 | 0.617 | 0.422 | -0.006 |
果形指数 Fruit shape index | -0.724 | -0.355 | 0.079 | 0.506 |
硝酸盐 Nitrate nitrogen | -0.572 | -0.592 | -0.101 | -0.459 |
VC | 0.958 | -0.14 | 0.155 | -0.02 |
可滴定酸 Titratable acid | 0.889 | 0.303 | 0.102 | 0.26 |
可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | 0.887 | 0.272 | 0.015 | 0.292 |
糖酸比 Sugar acid ratio | 0.93 | 0.031 | 0.029 | 0.237 |
番茄红素 Lycopene | 0.538 | -0.017 | -0.54 | 0.47 |
硬度 Hardness | 0.005 | 0.004 | 0.893 | 0.042 |
可溶性固形物 Soluble solids | 0.37 | 0.189 | 0.835 | -0.075 |
颜色指数 Color index | 0.212 | 0.343 | -0.041 | 0.785 |
心室数 Number of ventricular | 0.197 | 0.9 | 0.127 | 0.325 |
果肉厚度 Pulp thickness | 0.484 | 0.73 | 0.239 | 0.173 |
处理 Treatment | 主成分Principal component | 综合得分 Comprehensive score | 排名 Ranking | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
CK | -3.028 | -1.873 | 0.626 | -0.576 | -1.745 | 4 |
C450 | -0.797 | 1.985 | 0.304 | -0.470 | 0.055 | 2 |
C900 | 0.198 | 0.743 | -1.294 | -0.255 | 0.046 | 3 |
C1 800 | 3.620 | -0.852 | 0.354 | 1.303 | 1.640 | 1 |
Tab.7 Comprehensive evaluation results of tomato quality under different fertilization treatments
处理 Treatment | 主成分Principal component | 综合得分 Comprehensive score | 排名 Ranking | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
CK | -3.028 | -1.873 | 0.626 | -0.576 | -1.745 | 4 |
C450 | -0.797 | 1.985 | 0.304 | -0.470 | 0.055 | 2 |
C900 | 0.198 | 0.743 | -1.294 | -0.255 | 0.046 | 3 |
C1 800 | 3.620 | -0.852 | 0.354 | 1.303 | 1.640 | 1 |
[1] | 侯晓静. 新疆加工番茄品质分析及可控性研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆大学, 2013. |
HOU Xiaojing. Quality analysis and controllability of processing tomato in Xinjiang[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang University, 2013. | |
[2] | Bhattarai S P, Su N, Midmore D J. Oxygation unlocks yield potentials of crops in oxygen-limited soil environments[J]. Advances in Agronomy, 2005, 88:313-377. |
[3] | 胡蔼堂. 植物营养学(下册)[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2003. |
HU Aitang. Plant Nutrition (Volume II)[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2003. | |
[4] | 费超, 丁效东. 设施番茄施镁提质增产效果显著[J]. 中国农资, 2020,(19):12. |
FEI Chao, DING Xiaodong. The effect of magnesium application on quality and yield of protected tomato was significant[J]. China Agricultural Materials, 2020,(19): 12. | |
[5] | 董彩霞, 周健民, 王火焰. 不同番茄品种对缺钙敏感性的差异[J]. 西北植物学报, 2003,(5):777-782. |
DONG Caixia, ZHOU Jianmin, WANG Huohuo. Differences in sensitivity of different tomato varieties to calcium deficiency[J]. Journal of Northwest Botany, 2003,(5):777-782. | |
[6] | 王丹丹, 张庆银, 李燕, 等. 日光温室袋培番茄氮、磷、钾、钙、镁营养吸收分配规律研究[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2021, 44(1):33-40. |
WANG Dandan, ZHANG Qingyin, LI Yan, et al. Study on nutrient absorption and distribution of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium and magnesium in bag culture tomato in solar greenhouse[J]. Journal of Hebei Agricultural University, 2021, 44(1):33-40. | |
[7] | 于会丽, 林治安, 李燕婷, 等. 喷施小分子有机物对小油菜生长发育和养分吸收的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(6):1560-1568. |
YU Huili, LIN Zhengan, LI Yanting, et al. Effects of spraying small molecular organic matter on growth, development and nutrient absorption of Brassica napus[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2014, 20(6):1560-1568. | |
[8] | 王娟, 张泽山, 杨江伟. 石灰性土壤施镁助力葡萄提质增产[J]. 中国农资, 2020,(17):9. |
WANG Juan, ZHANG Zeshan, YANG Jiangwei. Magnesium application in calcareous soil helps improve grape quality and yield[J]. China Agricultural Materials, 2020,(17):9. | |
[9] | 李美宁, 危常州, 朱齐超, 等. 不同施钙措施对加工番茄脐腐病发生率及产量品质的影响[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 31(2):133-136. |
LI Meining, WEI Changzhou, ZHU Qichao, et al. Effects of different calcium application measures on the incidence of navel rot, yield and quality of processing tomato[J]. Journal of Shihezi University (Natural Science Ed.), 2013, 31(2):133-136. | |
[10] | 申晓芳. 不同钙、镁肥处理对番茄生长、产量和品质影响的研究[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2015. |
SHEN Xiaofang. Effects of different calcium and magnesium fertilizer treatments on tomato growth, yield and quality[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2015. | |
[11] | 刘军丽, 包婕, 李建设, 等. 限根下不同施钙量对番茄品质、产量及养分的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32(10):2403-2411. |
LIU Junli, BAO Jie, LI Jianshe, et al. Effects of different calcium application rates on tomato quality, yield and nutrients under root restriction[J]. Southwest Agricultural Journal, 2019, 32(10):2403-2411. | |
[12] | 刘卫萍, 陈日远, 孙光闻, 等. 不同钙素水平对红葱生长和品质的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2008,(2):25-27. |
LIU Weiping, CHEN Riyuan, SUN Guangwen, et al. Effects of different calcium levels on growth and quality of red onion[J]. Chinese Vegetable, 2008,(2):25-27. | |
[13] | 秦鱼生, 涂仕华, 冯文强, 等. 成都平原露地番茄施用钙、镁、锌、锰肥的效应[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2008,(3):57-59. |
QIN Yusheng, TU Shihua, FENG Wenqiang, et al. Effects of calcium, magnesium,zinc and manganese fertilizers on Tomato in open field of Chengdu Plain[J]. China Soil and Fertilizer, 2008,(3):57-59. | |
[14] | Trolove S N, Wheeler S, Spiers A. A comparison of three methods of magnesium application to grapes[J]. Agronomy New Zealand, 2008. |
[15] |
Morton A R, Trolove S N, Kerckhoffs L H J. Magnesium deficiency in citrus grown in the Gisborne district of New Zealand[J]. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 2008, 36(3):199-213.
DOI URL |
[16] | 杨竹青. 钙镁对番茄产量品质和养分吸收的影响[J]. 土壤肥料, 1994, 3(2):14-16. |
YANG Zhuqing. Effects of calcium and magnesium on yield, quality and nutrient absorption of tomato[J]. Soil and Fertilizer, 1994, 3(2):14-16. | |
[17] | 范兵华, 马乐乐, 李建明. 不同配方营养液对番茄产量、品质及养分吸收的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(5):104-112,122. |
FAN Binghua, MA Lele, LI Jianming. Effects of different nutrient solutions on yield, quality and nutrient absorption of tomato[J]. Journal Of Northwest University Of Agriculture And Forestry Science And Technology (Natural Science Ed.), 2021, 49 (5): 104-112,122. | |
[18] | 李小方, 张志良. 植物生理学试验指导[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2016. |
LI Xiaofang, ZHANG Zhiliang. Experimental Guidance Of Plant Physiology[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2016. | |
[19] | 李伏生. 土壤钾钙镁的研究进展[J]. 广西农学报, 1992, 22(4):48-49. |
LI Fusheng. Research progress of soil potassium, calcium and magnesium[J]. Journal of Guangxi agriculture, 1992, 22(4):48-49. | |
[20] | Aghofack Nguemezi J, Noumbo G T, Nkumbe C N. Influence of calcium and magnesium based fertilizers on fungal diseases, plant growth parameters and fruit quality of three varieties of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)[J]. Journal Of Science And Technology (Ghana), 2014, 34(1):9. |
[21] | 李娟, 章明清, 林琼, 等. 钾、钙、镁交互作用对烤烟生长和养分吸收的影响[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2005,(4):125-129. |
LI Juan, ZHANG Mingqing, LIN Qiong, et al. Effects of interaction of potassium, calcium and magnesium on growth and nutrient absorption of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Journal Of Anhui Agricultural University, 2005,(4): 125-129. | |
[22] |
Barrett D M, Beaulieu J C, Shewfelt R. Color, Flavor, Texture, and nutritional quality of fresh-cut fruits and vegetables: Desirable levels, instrumental and sensory measurement, and the effects of Processing[J]. Critical Reviews In Food Science And Nutrition, 2010, 50(5):369-389.
DOI PMID |
[23] |
刘美迎, 李小龙, 梁茁, 等. 基于模糊数学和聚类分析的鲜食葡萄品种综合品质评价[J]. 食品科学, 2015, 36(13) :57-64.
DOI |
LIU Meiying, LI Xiaolong, LIANG Zhuo, et al. Comprehensive quality evaluation of fresh grape varieties based on fuzzy mathematics and cluster analysis[J]. Food Science, 2015, 36(13):57-64. | |
[24] | 姚棋, 韩天云, 梁祎, 等. 外源钙和EBR处理对番茄果实品质特性的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2021, 34(10):74-79. |
YAO Qi, HAN Tianyun, LIANG Yi, et al. Effects of exogenous calcium and EBR treatment on fruit quality characteristics of tomato[J]. Chinese Melons and Vegetables, 2021, 34(10):74-79. | |
[25] | 刘军丽, 包婕, 李建设, 等. 日光温室土壤限根下不同施钙量对番茄品质产量及植株养分的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2019,(16):82-89. |
LIU Junli, BAO Jie, LI Jianshe, et al. Effects of different calcium application rates on tomato quality, yield and plant nutrients under soil root restriction in solar greenhouse[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2019,(16):82-89. | |
[26] | 关军锋, 李广敏. 钙在植物乙烯生成及信号传递中的生理作用[J]. 植物学通报, 2000,(5):413-418. |
GUAN Junfeng, LI Guangmin. Physiological role of calcium in plant ethylene production and signal transduction[J]. Bulletin of Botany, 2000,(5):413-418. | |
[27] |
Feng W, Kang S, Du T, et al. Determination of comprehensive quality index for tomato and its response to different irrigation treatments[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2011, 98(8):1228-1238.
DOI URL |
[28] | 吴一群, 林琼, 陈子聪, 等. 钙水平对无限生长型番茄钙吸收利用及果实品质和产量的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(5):185-189. |
WUYiqun, LIN Qiong, CHEN Zicong, et al. Effects of calcium level on calcium absorption and utilization, fruit quality and yield of infinite growth tomato[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 33(5):185-189. | |
[29] |
Patras A, Brunton N P, Downey G, et al. Application of principal component and hierarchical cluster analysis to classify fruits and vegetables commonly consumed in Ireland based on in vitro antioxidant activity[J]. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2011, 24(2):250-256.
DOI URL |
[30] | 王辉民, 靳小勇, 刘颖超, 等. 叶面喷施镁肥对缺镁番茄养分吸收和分配的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017, 35(3):226-231. |
WANG Huimin, JIN Xiaoyong, LIU Yingchao, et al. Effects of foliar spraying magnesium fertilizer on nutrient absorption and distribution of magnesium deficient tomato[J]. Agricultural Research in Arid Areas, 2017, 35(3):226-231. | |
[31] | 蒋欣梅, 董然, 郑姗姗, 等. 不同性质钙肥施用对番茄产量及品质的影响[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2015,(20):77-79. |
JIANG Xinmei, DONG Ran, ZHENG Shanshan, et al. Effects of different calcium fertilizers on Yield and quality of tomato[J]. Changjiang Vegetable, 2015,(20):77-79. | |
[32] | 董琼, 李世民, 高尚杰, 等. 不同种源树番茄果实品质比较及综合分析[J/OL]. 食品与发酵工业:1-11[2021-11-17]. |
DONG Qiong, LI Shimin, GAO Shangjie, et al. Comparison and comprehensive analysis of fruit quality of tomato from different provenance trees[J/OL]. Food and Fermentation Industry: 1-11[2021-11-17]. |
[1] | YANG Hongmei, ZHANG Yueqiang, SHI Yingwu, Omarjan Kurban, LIN Qing, WANG Ning, CHU Min, ZENG Jun. Effects of different types of foliar fertilizers on grain yield and 1uality of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2182-2188. |
[2] | LIU Yufang, ZHANG Zhigang, LI Changcheng, LI Hong, CHENG Ping, YANG Lu. Effects of different temperature and maturity on rot rate and quality of apricot during storage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2189-2197. |
[3] | GONG Duorui, YANG Liling, HAN Jiang, YANG Zhongqiang, LIU Jia, WEN Yu, ZHU Zhanjiang, CUI Kuanbo. Effects of simulated cold chain transport on cell membrane lipid peroxidation and quality of apricot fruit during storage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2198-2207. |
[4] | LI Ziqin, CHEN Ya, LI Wenqi, JIA Wenting, GUO Huijing, SONG Fangyuan, ZHAO Zhiyong, LIU Chengjiang. Effects of different precooling methods combined with H2O2 treatment on the quality of lvtangxin winter jujube during storage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2208-2215. |
[5] | WANG Xin, LIN Tao, CUI Jianping, WU Fengquan, TANG Zhixuan, CUI Laiyuan, GUO Rensong, WANG Liang, ZHENG Zipiao. Effects of planting mode and irrigation quota on yield and fiber quality of machine-picked long-staple cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1821-1829. |
[6] | HAN Shouan, WANG Min, Maihemuti Turupu, XIE Hui, Aiermaike Caikasimu, LIU Jiale, ZHANG Wen, PAN Mingqi. Effects of different light quality treatments on leaf photosynthetic characteristics and fruit quality of Cabernet Sauvignon grapes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1894-1903. |
[7] | XIAO Lele, LI Zhiqiang, YE Jun, PU Min, RUAN Xiangyang, LIU Huaijin. Effects of combined application of peptide fertilizer and magnesium on quality and yield of suntianni seedless grape [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1904-1912. |
[8] | ZHANG Chao, BAI Yungang, ZHENG Ming, XIAO Jun, DING Ping. Synergistic effect of water and fertilizer on grape in extreme arid area [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1931-1939. |
[9] | WANG Ping, KONG Na, PAN Yan, SUN Xiping, XU Bin, ZHANG Ting. Effects of chlorine dioxide fumigation treatments on the storage of fresh walnuts [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1940-1949. |
[10] | ZHENG Heyun, YAO Jun, LI Chao, ZHANG Cuihuan, GENG Xinli. Effects of storage temperatures on melon quality and the establishment of prediction models [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1950-1957. |
[11] | DUAN Songjiang, PENG Zengying, SHEN Yingying, Mulidier Baibolati, WU Yifan, CUI jianping, ZHANG Jusong. Responses of seed cotton yield and fiber quality of different sea island cotton varieties to nitrogen fertilizer [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1569-1579. |
[12] | LIANG Zhiguo, WANG Zepeng, JIA Songnan, FAN Fengcui, LIU Shengyao, ZHANG Zhe, DU Fenghuan, QIN Yong. Effects of different soil moisture on growth, yield, quality and water use efficiency of greenhouse eggplant [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1713-1721. |
[13] | WANG Wentao, WU Bo, TAI Hongzhong, LIAN Wenming, DAI Cuirong, LI Shuangjiang, PU Yanmei. Effects of different sowing dates on cotton growth in aral reclamation area, Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1413-1422. |
[14] | SUN Xiping, KONG Na, XU Mingqiang, WANG Ping, XU Bin, ZHANG Ting. Effects of low-pressure static magnetic field treatments on defrosting and shelf Life quality of fresh walnuts [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1506-1514. |
[15] | WANG Feifei, GU Yangyang, YU Guoqi, CHENG Jingye, PAN Hui, WANG Shunmeng, ZHU Juan, LYU Chao, GUO Baojian, XU Rugen. Grain and malt quality analysis of malting barley [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1134-1140. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||