Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (5): 1068-1076.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.05.004
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Cultivation Physiology·Physiology and Biochemistry·Germplasm Resources • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHENG Ruiming1,2(), ZHOU Xiaoyun2,3, LI Jin2,3, ZHANG Jungao2,3, CHENG Yong3, MA Deying1, LIANG Jing2,3, GONG Jingyun2,3, LEI Bin2,3()
Received:
2021-10-11
Online:
2022-05-20
Published:
2022-06-09
Correspondence author:
LEI Bin
Supported by:
郑瑞明1,2(), 周小云2,3, 李进2,3, 张军高2,3, 陈勇3, 马德英1, 梁晶2,3, 龚静云2,3, 雷斌2,3()
通讯作者:
雷斌
作者简介:
郑瑞明(1996-),男,安徽合肥人,硕士研究生,研究方向为农作物化控技术与产品,(E-mail) 196685079@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
ZHENG Ruiming, ZHOU Xiaoyun, LI Jin, ZHANG Jungao, CHENG Yong, MA Deying, LIANG Jing, GONG Jingyun, LEI Bin. Effects of Three Methanol Extracts from Plant on Stem Properties,Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Wheat[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1068-1076.
郑瑞明, 周小云, 李进, 张军高, 陈勇, 马德英, 梁晶, 龚静云, 雷斌. 3种植物提取物对小麦茎秆性状、光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(5): 1068-1076.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.05.004
Fig.1 Comparison of basal internode length in Wheat Note: Different lowercase letters in the picture indicate that there is significant difference between treatments at P<0.05. CK: water as a control group; S1: 0.01% methanol extraction from Sophra alopecuroides; S2: 0.1% methanol extraction from Sophra alopecuroides; S3: 1% methanol extraction from Sophra alopecuroides; S4: 0.01% methanol extraction from Cuminum cyminum; S5: 0.1% methanol extraction from Cuminum cyminum; S6: 1% methanol extraction from Cuminum cyminum; S7: 0.01% methanol extraction from Vallisneria natans; S8: 0.1% methanol extraction from Vallisneria natans; S9: 1% methanol extraction from Vallisneria natans. The same as below
处理 Treatment | 净光合速率 Pn (μmol/(m2·S)) | 蒸腾速率 Tr (mmol/(m2·S)) | 气孔导度 Gs (mol/(m2·S)) | 胞间二氧化碳浓度 Ci (μmol/L) | 气孔限制值 Stomatal limiation | SPAD值 SPAD value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 14.9±1.2a | 9.3±0.7a | 19.4±2.3a | 315.7±15.7a | 0.2a | 50.7±0.6a |
S1 | 15.5±1.1a | 9.7±0.8a | 21.9±3.0a | 322.3±30.0a | 0.2a | 54.1±1.8a |
S2 | 14.9±1.1b | 9.0±0.7a | 19.3±3.5b | 310.3±25.0c | 0.2a | 49.9±1.0b |
S3 | 13.2±1.2c | 9.0±0.9a | 18.3±3.2c | 310.5±23.8c | 0.2a | 48.2±1.0b |
S4 | 15.0±1.1b | 9.3±0.7a | 20.7±3.6b | 316.2±18.6b | 0.2a | 48.0±1.5b |
S5 | 14.8±1.2b | 9.1±0.7a | 19.6±3.0b | 314.6±10.8b | 0.2a | 49.9±0.9b |
S6 | 14.0±1.1c | 9.2±0.7a | 18.5±4.1c | 310.6±23.6b | 0.2a | 48.9±1.9b |
S7 | 15.0±1.1b | 9.7±0.7a | 20.3±4.3b | 318.8±17.0b | 0.2a | 48.6±1.5b |
S8 | 14.9±1.1b | 9.3±0.8a | 19.6±3.4b | 314.3±16.9b | 0.2a | 47.6±1.4b |
S9 | 14.3±1.1c | 9.4±0.7a | 18.8±2.5c | 314.5±28.6b | 0.2a | 47.8±1.5b |
Table 1 Comparison of photosynthetic characteristics of flag leaves in Wheat
处理 Treatment | 净光合速率 Pn (μmol/(m2·S)) | 蒸腾速率 Tr (mmol/(m2·S)) | 气孔导度 Gs (mol/(m2·S)) | 胞间二氧化碳浓度 Ci (μmol/L) | 气孔限制值 Stomatal limiation | SPAD值 SPAD value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 14.9±1.2a | 9.3±0.7a | 19.4±2.3a | 315.7±15.7a | 0.2a | 50.7±0.6a |
S1 | 15.5±1.1a | 9.7±0.8a | 21.9±3.0a | 322.3±30.0a | 0.2a | 54.1±1.8a |
S2 | 14.9±1.1b | 9.0±0.7a | 19.3±3.5b | 310.3±25.0c | 0.2a | 49.9±1.0b |
S3 | 13.2±1.2c | 9.0±0.9a | 18.3±3.2c | 310.5±23.8c | 0.2a | 48.2±1.0b |
S4 | 15.0±1.1b | 9.3±0.7a | 20.7±3.6b | 316.2±18.6b | 0.2a | 48.0±1.5b |
S5 | 14.8±1.2b | 9.1±0.7a | 19.6±3.0b | 314.6±10.8b | 0.2a | 49.9±0.9b |
S6 | 14.0±1.1c | 9.2±0.7a | 18.5±4.1c | 310.6±23.6b | 0.2a | 48.9±1.9b |
S7 | 15.0±1.1b | 9.7±0.7a | 20.3±4.3b | 318.8±17.0b | 0.2a | 48.6±1.5b |
S8 | 14.9±1.1b | 9.3±0.8a | 19.6±3.4b | 314.3±16.9b | 0.2a | 47.6±1.4b |
S9 | 14.3±1.1c | 9.4±0.7a | 18.8±2.5c | 314.5±28.6b | 0.2a | 47.8±1.5b |
处理 Treatment | 穗粒数 Grain number (粒) | 籽粒重量 Seed weight (g) | 千粒重 1,000 -grain weight (g) | 容重 Density (g/L) | 理论产量 Theoretical yield (kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 31.3±2.6b | 32.0±0.1b | 49.6±1.3b | 810.3±5.5b | 5 449.9±13.4b |
S1 | 34.5±2.6a | 39.9±1.4a | 51.0±1.4a | 839.8±6.5a | 6 204.8±13.6a |
S2 | 33.5±2.9b | 34.3±1.4b | 49.9±1.8b | 821.8±6. | 5 895.1±25.2b |
S3 | 29.0±2. | 28.9±0.8b | 49.7±1.3b | 812.2±6. | 5 082.2±22.7b |
S4 | 34.00±2. | 35.5±1.5a | 50.4±1. | 837.0±4. | 6 042.9±24.8ab |
S5 | 33.00±2.4b | 34.6±0. | 50.0±1. | 812.3±1. | 5 818.3±12.9b |
S6 | 27.0±2.3d | 26.0±0.2c | 49.1±1.2b | 818.0±8. | 4 674.8±22.8d |
S7 | 30.7±2. | 31.5±1.2b | 49.6±1.4b | 809.8±2. | 5 345.3±33.2bc |
S8 | 32.5±2.4b | 30.9±0. | 50.0±1. | 817.8±5. | 5 730.4±22.9b |
S9 | 29.0±2.2bc | 26.8±1.7c | 49.0±1.3b | 814.5±5. | 5 010.8±12.9bc |
Table 2 Comparison of yield and yield components in Wheat
处理 Treatment | 穗粒数 Grain number (粒) | 籽粒重量 Seed weight (g) | 千粒重 1,000 -grain weight (g) | 容重 Density (g/L) | 理论产量 Theoretical yield (kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 31.3±2.6b | 32.0±0.1b | 49.6±1.3b | 810.3±5.5b | 5 449.9±13.4b |
S1 | 34.5±2.6a | 39.9±1.4a | 51.0±1.4a | 839.8±6.5a | 6 204.8±13.6a |
S2 | 33.5±2.9b | 34.3±1.4b | 49.9±1.8b | 821.8±6. | 5 895.1±25.2b |
S3 | 29.0±2. | 28.9±0.8b | 49.7±1.3b | 812.2±6. | 5 082.2±22.7b |
S4 | 34.00±2. | 35.5±1.5a | 50.4±1. | 837.0±4. | 6 042.9±24.8ab |
S5 | 33.00±2.4b | 34.6±0. | 50.0±1. | 812.3±1. | 5 818.3±12.9b |
S6 | 27.0±2.3d | 26.0±0.2c | 49.1±1.2b | 818.0±8. | 4 674.8±22.8d |
S7 | 30.7±2. | 31.5±1.2b | 49.6±1.4b | 809.8±2. | 5 345.3±33.2bc |
S8 | 32.5±2.4b | 30.9±0. | 50.0±1. | 817.8±5. | 5 730.4±22.9b |
S9 | 29.0±2.2bc | 26.8±1.7c | 49.0±1.3b | 814.5±5. | 5 010.8±12.9bc |
处理 Treat ment | 因子 Factors | F1 | F2 | F | 排序 Order | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Factor 1 | Factor 2 | |||||
CK | -0.46 | 0.16 | -1.52 | 0.21 | -1.26 | 7 |
S1 | 1.59 | -0.35 | 5.20 | -0.48 | 4.35 | 1 |
S2 | -0.01 | 1.32 | -0.02 | 1.81 | 0.26 | 4 |
S3 | -1.12 | -0.52 | -3.66 | -0.72 | -3.22 | 9 |
S4 | 0.32 | 1.92 | 1.06 | 2.62 | 1.29 | 2 |
S5 | 0.07 | 0.53 | 0.22 | 0.72 | 0.30 | 3 |
S6 | -1.14 | -1.16 | -3.73 | -1.58 | -3.41 | 10 |
S7 | -0.06 | -0.52 | -0.20 | -0.72 | -0.28 | 5 |
S8 | -0.15 | 0.52 | -0.50 | 0.71 | -0.32 | 6 |
S9 | -0.95 | -0.61 | -3.10 | -0.83 | -2.76 | 8 |
Table 3 Comparison of principal component analysis
处理 Treat ment | 因子 Factors | F1 | F2 | F | 排序 Order | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Factor 1 | Factor 2 | |||||
CK | -0.46 | 0.16 | -1.52 | 0.21 | -1.26 | 7 |
S1 | 1.59 | -0.35 | 5.20 | -0.48 | 4.35 | 1 |
S2 | -0.01 | 1.32 | -0.02 | 1.81 | 0.26 | 4 |
S3 | -1.12 | -0.52 | -3.66 | -0.72 | -3.22 | 9 |
S4 | 0.32 | 1.92 | 1.06 | 2.62 | 1.29 | 2 |
S5 | 0.07 | 0.53 | 0.22 | 0.72 | 0.30 | 3 |
S6 | -1.14 | -1.16 | -3.73 | -1.58 | -3.41 | 10 |
S7 | -0.06 | -0.52 | -0.20 | -0.72 | -0.28 | 5 |
S8 | -0.15 | 0.52 | -0.50 | 0.71 | -0.32 | 6 |
S9 | -0.95 | -0.61 | -3.10 | -0.83 | -2.76 | 8 |
[1] | 马瑞琦. 化控剂对冬小麦植株性状及产量品质的调节效应[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (1): 133-140. |
MA Ruiqi. The Regulatory Effect of Chemical Control Agent on Plant Traits and Yield Quality of Winter Wheat[J]. Journal of Crops, 2018, (1) : 133-140. | |
[2] | 朱权辉. 生物农药开发与运用的现状及其在西藏的前景和可行性初探[J]. 河南农业, 2021,(23): 42-43. |
ZHU Quanhui. Current situation of development and application of biological pesticides and its prospect and feasibility in Tibet[J]. Henan Agriculture, 2021,(23): 42-43. | |
[3] | 毛亮, 张以和, 潘卫萍. 吐鲁番市绿色植保工作思路探讨[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2021, 41(3): 92-95. |
MAO Liang, ZHANG Yihe, PAN Weiping. Discussion on the working ideas of green plant protection in Turpan[J]. China Plant Protection Guide, 2021, 41 (3): 92-95. | |
[4] | 宋三涛. 提高小麦品质的几种途径[J]. 河南农业, 2021,(22): 52. |
Song Santao. Several ways to improve wheat quality[J]. Henan Agriculture, 2021,(22): 52. | |
[5] | 许学明. 生物源农药的概念及其发展展望[J]. 连云港职业技术学院学报. 2015, 18(2): 40-43. |
XU Xueming. Concept and development prospect of Biogenic Pesticides[J]. Journal of Lianyungang Vocational and Technical College, 2015, 18 (2): 40-43. | |
[6] | 操海群, 岳永德, 化日茂, 等. 植物农药研究与开发进展[J]. 安徽农药大学学报, 2000, 27(1): 40-44. |
CAO Haiqun, YUE Yongde, HUA Rimao, et al. Research and development progress of plant pesticides[J]. Journal of Anhui Pesticide University, 2000, 27 (1): 40-44. | |
[7] | 于忻滢, 张国良, 范松, 等. 植物源农药研究进展[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2021,(7): 123-129. |
YU Xinying, ZHANG Guoliang, FAN Song, et al. Research progress of botanical pesticides[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Science, 2021,(7): 123-129. | |
[8] |
Geiger Michaela. Synergie zwischen priesterlichem und g ttlichem Handeln im Aaronitischen Segen (Num 6, 22-27)[J]. Vetus Testamentum, 2018, 68(1):51-72.
DOI URL |
[9] | 高玉莲, 常静, 王贻卉, 等. 瑞香狼毒根提取物对3种作物种子萌发和幼苗生长的化感作用[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(10): 83-91. |
GAO Yulian, CHANG Jing, WANG Weihui, et al. The chemical effect of The Rhian wolf poison root extract on the germination of seeds and seedling growth of 3 crops[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(10): 83-91. | |
[10] | 刘建新. 骆驼蓬提取物浸种对小麦幼苗生长及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2005, 25(9): 5. |
LIU Jianxin. Effect of camel poncho extract immersion on wheat seedling growth and antioxidant enzyme activity[J]. Northwestern Journal of Botany, 2005, 25 (9): 5. | |
[11] | 陈向明. 山核桃外果皮几种化学成分及对植物生长影响的研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2008. |
CHEN Xiangming. Study on several chemical components of pecan skins and their effects on plant growth[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2008. | |
[12] | 曾坤玉, 胡飞, 陈玉芬, 等. 四种与福寿螺(Ampullaria gigas)同源地入侵植物的杀螺效果[J]. 生态学报, 2008,(1): 260-266. |
ZENG Kunyu, HU Fei, CHEN Yufen, et al. Four homologous invasive plant effects with Ampullaria gigas[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008,(1): 260-266. | |
[13] | 周兵, 闫小红, 钟娟, 等. 3种莎草属伴生杂草提取物对水稻种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2010, 31(9): 1542-1548. |
ZHOU Bing, YAN Xiaohong, ZHONG Juan, et al. Effects of Extracts from Three Companion Weeds in Cyperus sp.on Rice Seed Germination and Seedling Growth[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2010, 31 (9): 1542-1548. | |
[14] | 韩丰竹, 姜琳, 李永德, 等. 大黄提取物对小麦种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 种子科技, 2016, 34(7): 105-106. |
HAN Fengzhu, JIANG Lin, LI Yongde, et al. Effects of Large Yellow Extract on Wheat Seed Germination and Seedling Growth[J]. Seed Science & Technology, 2016, 34 (7): 105-106. | |
[15] | 孙慧, 王亚玲, 刘易, 等. 新疆地区马铃薯品种抗旱性比较及筛选[J]. 西北农业学报, 2021, 30(12): 1787-1796. |
SUN Hui, WANG Yaling, LIU Yi, et al. Comparison and Screening of Drought Resistance of Potato Varieties in Xinjiang[J]. Northwest Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 30 (12): 1787-1796. | |
[16] | 郭小强. 苦豆子种子提取物对小麦幼苗生长的影响[J]. 甘肃农业, 2012,(9): 70-71. |
GUO Xiaoqiang. Effect of bitter bean seed extract on Wheat Seedling Growth[J]. Gansu Agriculture, 2012,(9): 70-71. | |
[17] | 赵冬霞, 焦国安, 王璐, 等. 不同化控剂两种剂量对小麦农艺性状及产量的影响初探[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2021,(1): 112-114. |
ZHAO Dongxia, JIAO Guoan, WANG Lu, et al. Preliminary study on the effects of two doses of different chemical control agents on wheat agronomic characters and yield[J]. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021,(1): 112-114. | |
[18] |
张玉琼, 仲延龙, 高翠云, 等. 高效液相色谱法分离和测定小麦中的5种内源激素[J]. 色谱, 2013, 31(8): 800-803.
DOI PMID |
ZHANG Yuqiong, ZHONG Yanlong, GAO Cuiyun, et al. High-efficiency liquid chromatography separation and determination of 5 endogenous hormones in wheat[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2013, 31 (8): 800-803.
PMID |
|
[19] | 吕丽荣. 茶多酚对盐处理下小麦幼苗叶片光合特性及抗氧化反应的影响[D]. 兰州: 西北师范大学, 2018. |
LÜ Lirong. Effects of tea polyphenols on Photosynthetic Characteristics and antioxidant response of Wheat Seedling Leaves under salt treatment[D]. Lanzhou: Northwest Normal University, 2018. | |
[20] | 薛香. 小麦叶片叶绿素含量测定及其与SPAD值的关系[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2010, 49(11): 2701-2702. |
XUE Xiang. Determination of chlorophyll content in wheat leaves and its relationship with SPAD value[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 49 (11): 2701-2702. | |
[21] | 杜小凤, 顾大路, 杨文飞, 等. 增产抗倒伏化控剂劲丰谷德对小麦生长发育及产量构成的影响[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2019,(2): 113-115. |
DU Xiaofeng, GU Dalu, YANG Wenfei, et al. Effects of yield increasing and lodging resistant chemical control agent jinfenggude on wheat growth and yield composition[J]. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019,(2): 113-115. | |
[22] | 洪坡. 小麦TaTOC1s基因调控开花与发育的分子机理研究[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2018. |
HONG Po. Study on the molecular mechanism of wheat tatoc1s gene regulating flowering and development [D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2018. | |
[23] | 邓霞. 小麦灌浆期SPAD值对产量的影响研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆师范大学, 2020. |
DENG Xia. Study on the effect of SPAD value on yield during wheat grouting period[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Normal University, 2020. | |
[24] | 王倩, 孙会军, 孙令强, 等. 化感物质及作用机理[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2005, (S1): 70-74. |
WANG Qian, SUN Huijun, SUN Lingqiang, et al. Allelopathic Substances and Mechanisms of Action[J]. Chinese Vegetables, 2005, (S1): 70-74 | |
[25] | 朱丽珍. 植物化感作用及其在草地农业生态系统中的应用[J]. 土壤与作物, 2021, 10(1): 1-17. |
ZHU Lizhen. Phytoplasty and Its Application in Grassland Agro-ecosystems[J]. Soil and Crops, 2021, 10(1): 1-17. | |
[26] | 卢辛成. 木醋液对小麦幼苗生长、抗氧化特性及内源激素含量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(7): 7-13. |
LU Xincheng. Effects of Wood Vinegar Solution on Growth, Antioxidant Characteristics and Endogenous Hormone content of Wheat Seedlings[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(7): 7-13. | |
[27] | 罗洁. 基肥与播种密度对冬小麦西农805光合特性及穗部性状的影响[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2021. |
LUO Jie. Effect of base fertilizer and seed density on the photosynthesis characteristics and spike characteristics of winter wheat 805 [D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2021. | |
[28] | 马雪, 朱忠坤, 郭景丽, 等. 海藻酸复合肥对叶菜类蔬菜产量的影响[J]. 化肥工业, 2019, 46(6): 72-74. |
MA Xue, ZHU Zhongkun, GUO Jingli, et al. Effects of Alginate Compound Fertilizer on Yield of Leafy Vegetables[J]. Chemical Fertilizer Industry, 2019, 46(6) : 72-74. | |
[29] | 任晶. 人参根际有机酸的化感活性及环境行为研究[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2016. |
REN Jing. Study on The Allelopathic Activity and Environmental Behavior of Rhizosphere Organic Acids of Ginseng[D]. Changchun: Jilin Agricultural University, 2016. | |
[30] | 吴金芝. 干旱对冬小麦旗叶光合参数、产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2021, 37(5): 1108-1118. |
WU Jinzhi. Effects of drought on the photosynthesis parameters, yield and water utilization efficiency of winter wheat flag leaves[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 37(5): 1108-1118. | |
[31] | 孙晓, 尹皓婵, 张占田, 等. 海藻提取物对水稻产量及养分利用的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(16): 100-103. |
Sun Xiao, Yin Haochan, Zhang Zhantian, et al. Effects of Seaweed Extract on Rice Yield and Nutrient Utilization[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(16): 100-103. | |
[32] | 马德源, 马云飞, 于金慧, 等. 海藻肥在现代农业生产中的研究进展[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(8): 145-151. |
Ma Deyuan, Ma Yunfei, Yu Jinhui, et al. Research progress of seaweed fertilizer in modern agricultural production[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 52(8): 145-151. |
[1] | CHEN Chuanxin, ZHNAG Yongqiang, NIE Shihui, KONG Depeng, Sailihan Sai, XU Qijiang, LEI Junjie. Effects of biomass charcoal application rate on the growth, development, and yield of winter wheat under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2146-2151. |
[2] | WANG Lihong, ZHANG Hongzhi, ZHANG Yueqiang, LI Jianfeng, WANG Zhong, GAO Xin, SHI Jia, WANG Chunsheng, XIA Jianqiang, FAN Zheru. Analysis of dry matter production, transport and nitrogen fertilizer utilization caused by yield Gap at different yield levels of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2152-2162. |
[3] | WANG Xiaoyu, WANG Xiaoping, SHI Wenyu, LIU Meiyan, MA Jian, GUO Yunpeng, SONG Ruixin, WANG Qingtao. Responses of photosynthetic characteristics, dry matter accumulation and yield to drought stress in winter wheat at jointing stage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2163-2172. |
[4] | YANG Hongmei, ZHANG Yueqiang, SHI Yingwu, Omarjan Kurban, LIN Qing, WANG Ning, CHU Min, ZENG Jun. Effects of different types of foliar fertilizers on grain yield and 1uality of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2182-2188. |
[5] | DONG Yanxue, JIA Yonghong, ZHANG Jinshan, LI Dandan, WANG Kai, LUO Siwei, WANG Runqi, SHI Shubing. Effects of different ecological conditions on dry matter accumulation and yield of spring wheat varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1848-1857. |
[6] | FENG Mei, LIU Chaoqin, CHEN Jie, LIU Wenlong, YANG Zhigang, TIAN Jieying, HUANG Xin. Analysis of character variation and heterosis of F1 generation of different crosses in wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1858-1865. |
[7] | LI Huaisheng, AI Hongyu, MENG Ling, WANG Heya, ZHANG Lei, AI Haifeng. Effects of chasing rate during peak nutrient uptake of transport under n Reduction on spring wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1866-1872. |
[8] | ZHANG Yongqiang, CHEN Chuanxin, NIE Shihui, XU Qijiang, Sailihan Sai, LEI Junjie. Regulation of chlormequat on lodging resistance of winter wheat stem during the period of drip application of CCC [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1873-1878. |
[9] | HAN Shouan, WANG Min, Maihemuti Turupu, XIE Hui, Aiermaike Caikasimu, LIU Jiale, ZHANG Wen, PAN Mingqi. Effects of different light quality treatments on leaf photosynthetic characteristics and fruit quality of Cabernet Sauvignon grapes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1894-1903. |
[10] | ZHU Xuehui, ZHANG Wen, MA Yunlong, HE Pengfei, HAN Shouan, WANG Min, TIAN Jia, XIE Hui. Effects of high temperature stress on photosynthetic characteristics of grape [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1913-1921. |
[11] | YANG Jinyu, WANG Xihe, SUN Jiusheng. Effect of hydroponic culture on amino acid composition of whole plant barley and wheat seedlings and comparative analysis [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1589-1595. |
[12] | TIAN Wenqiang, DONG Yanxue, SHI Yongqing, LEI Junjie, SUN Ganggang, WANG Hongyi, NIE Lingfan, GOU Fei, AI Hongyu, SHI Shubing, ZHANG Jinshan. Effects of sowing date on stem traits and population dynamics of ultra late winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1301-1307. |
[13] | DONG Deyu, CHENG Yukun, WANG Rui, LEI Junjie, WANG Wei, CHEN Chuanxin, ZHENG Yongqiang, GENG Hongwei. Retrieval of wheat photosynthetic parameters at different growth stages based on UAV multispectral images [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1308-1318. |
[14] | ZHANG Yongqiang, CHEN Chuanxin, XU Qijiang, NIE Shihui, LEI Junjie, LIU Changwen. Effects of combined application of nitrogen enhancer and nitrogen reduction on leaf physiology and yield of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1319-1325. |
[15] | LAI Ning, GENG Qinglong, LI Yongfu, LI Na, XIN Huinan, BU Shengbing, CHEN Shuhuang. Effects of organic manure application combined with chemical fertilizer on yield, nitrogen, phosphorus uptake and utilization, and soil fertility of the extremely-late winter sown wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1335-1343. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||