减氮下运筹养分吸收高峰期追施比例对春小麦的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.08.006

新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (8): 1866-1872.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.08.006

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学·土壤肥料 • 上一篇下一篇

减氮下运筹养分吸收高峰期追施比例对春小麦的影响

李怀胜¹(), 艾洪玉²(), 孟玲¹, 王贺亚¹, 张磊³, 艾海峰¹

1.新疆生产建设兵团第九师农业科学研究所(畜牧科学研究所),新疆额敏 834300
2.塔城地区农业科学研究所,新疆塔城 834300
3.塔里木大学,新疆阿拉尔 843300

收稿日期:2022-12-16 出版日期:2023-08-20 发布日期:2023-08-14
通信作者: 艾洪玉(1988-),女,四川南充人,高级农艺师,研究方向为作物栽培与育种,(E-mail)1475918863@qq.com
作者简介:李怀胜(1988-),男,甘肃定西人,助理研究员,研究方向为作物栽培与育种,(E-mail)1505421254@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目“绿洲小麦化肥农药减施技术集成研究与示范”(2018YFD20040608);兵团第九师科技攻关“滴灌春小麦节本提质增效关键技术研究与集成”

Effects of chasing rate during peak nutrient uptake of transport under n Reduction on spring wheat

LI Huaisheng¹(), AI Hongyu²(), MENG Ling¹, WANG Heya¹, ZHANG Lei³, AI Haifeng¹

1. Institute of Agricultural Sciences of the Ninth Division of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps(Animal Husbandry Science Research Institute), Tacheng Xinjiang 834300, China
2. Tacheng Prefecture Agrcultural Science Research Institute,Tachang Xinjiang 834700,China
3. Tarim University, Aral Xinjiang 843300,China

Received:2022-12-16 Online:2023-08-20 Published:2023-08-14
Correspondence author: AI Hongyu (1988-), female, Sichuan, senior agronomist, bachelor degree, research direction: crop cultivation and breeding work,(E-mail)1475918863@qq.com
Supported by:
National Key R & D Program Project "Research on the Oasis Wheat Chemical Fertilizer and Pesticide Application Reduction Technology Integration And Demonstration"(2018YFD20040608);Tackling Hard-Nut Problems in Science and Technology of the Ninth Division of XPCC "Research and Integration of Key Technologies for Saving Cost, Improving Quality and Efficiency of Drip Irrigation Spring Wheat"

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究新疆北疆滴灌春小麦高产、优质栽培中合理减氮养分运筹,为春小麦拔节至开花的氮肥施用量选择提供依据。【方法】以新春43号为供试材料,调研213户农户氮肥施入量390 kg/hm²的基础上,按照氮肥减量20%、30%和40%设置3个施氮水平(312、270和234 kg/hm²)及拔节至开花运筹比例(7∶3、5∶5、6∶4),研究不同施氮水平下运筹调控拔节至开花期的氮肥追施比例对滴灌春小麦的影响。【结果】N₁条件下,产量以R₃最高,较R₁、R₂增产7.4%、3.7%,各生育时期干物质积累量较R₁分别增加13.9%、17.5%、26.2%、10.3%,较R₂分别增加7.7%、3.6%、10.6%和2.6%;花前、花后同化物转运量差异性不显著,叶面积指数也表现为R₃>R₂>R₁。N₂条件下,产量与N₁条件下表现一致,干物质积累量各时期表现为R₂>R₁>R₃,花前、花后同化物转运量呈“先增后降”的变化趋势,均在R₂达到最大,分别为2 614.35和6 284.79 kg/hm²,叶面积指数表现为R₃>R₂>R₁。N₃条件下,R₂的产量显著高于R₁、R₃,增产幅度分别为25.4%和32.0%,各生育时期干物质积累量较R₁分别增加4.8%、10.8%、8.5%和23.2%,花前、花后同化物以R₃最大,为2 242.32 kg/hm²,较R₁、R₂分别增加了50.6%和36.8%,叶面积指数表现为R₂>R₁>R₃。【结论】纯氮234 kg/hm²,拔节至开花期氮肥运筹比例6∶4更加适应春小麦生产。

关键词: 氮肥运筹; 春小麦; 干物质积累与转运; 叶面积指数; 产量

Abstract:

【Objective】 To provide a basis for reasonable nitrogen reduction in high-yield and high-quality cultivation of spring wheat under drip irrigation in Northern Xinjiang and to determine the amount of nitrogen fertilizer from nodulation to flowering.【Methods】 Xinchun 43 was taken as the test material, on the basis of investigating the nitrogen application amount of 390 kg / hm² in 213 agricultural households, three nitrogen application levels (312, 270 and 234 kg / hm²) and the operation research ratio from nodulation to flowering (7∶3, 5∶5 and 6∶4) were set according to the nitrogen reduction of 20%, 30% and 40%, to study the effect of the transport ratios from nodulation to flowering on drip irrigated spring wheat.【Results】 Under the condition of N₁, the yield of R₃ was the highest, which was increased by 7.4% and 3.7% compared with those of R₁ and R₂.The dry matter accumulation increased by 13.9%, 17.5%, 26.2% and 10.3% compared with that of R₁, and 7.7%, 3.6%, 10.6% and 2.6% compared with R₂ in each period, respectively; There was no significant difference in assimilation transport before and after anthesis, and the leaf area index was R₃ > R₂ > R₁.Under N₂ condition, the yield was consistent with that under N₁ condition.The dry matter accumulation was R₂ > R₁ > R₃ in each period.The assimilation transport before and after flowering showed a trend of "increasing first and then decreasing", which reached the maximum in R₂, 2,614.35 and 6,284.79 kg / hm² respectively.The leaf area index was R₃ > R₂ > R₁.Under the condition of N₃, the yield of R₂ was significantly higher than those of R₁ and R₃, with an increase of 25.4% and 32.0%, respectively.The dry matter accumulation increased by 4.8%, 10.8%, 8.5% and 23.2% compared with that of R₁.The assimilates content before and after anthesis of R₃ was maximum at 2,242.32 kg/hm², which increased by 50.6% and 36.8% compared with R₁ and R₂, respectively, and the leaf area index showed R₂>R₁>R₃.【Conclusion】 The pure nitrogen 234 kg/hm²and the N fertilizer transportation ratio of 6:4 from nodulation to flowering are more suitable for spring wheat production under the conditions of this experiment.

Key words: nitrogen fertilizer operation research; spring wheat; dry matter accumulation and transport; leaf area index; yield

中图分类号:

S512

李怀胜, 艾洪玉, 孟玲, 王贺亚, 张磊, 艾海峰. 减氮下运筹养分吸收高峰期追施比例对春小麦的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1866-1872.

LI Huaisheng, AI Hongyu, MENG Ling, WANG Heya, ZHANG Lei, AI Haifeng. Effects of chasing rate during peak nutrient uptake of transport under n Reduction on spring wheat[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1866-1872.

图/表 6

参考文献 20

[1]	麻坤, 刁钢. 化肥对中国粮食产量变化贡献率的研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(4):1113-1120.
	MA Kun, DIAO Gang. Research on the contribution rate of fertilizer to grain yield in China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018, 24(4):1113-1120.
[2]	李亮科. 生产要素利用对粮食增产和环境影响研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2015.
	LI Liangke. Researchy on the effect of factor utilization on grain yield and environment[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2015.
[3]	韩晓增, 邹文秀, 尤梦阳. 减氮、加菌、改善土壤物理性状提高大豆固氮能力[J]. 大豆科技, 2011,(1):14.
	HAN Xiaozeng, ZOU Wenxiu, YOU Mengyang. Reducing nitrogen,adding bacteria, improving soil physical properties and increasing nitrogen fixation capacity of soybean[J]. Soybean Science and Technology, 2011,(1):14.
[4]	邹晓锦, 张鑫, 安景文. 氮肥减量后移对玉米产量和氮素吸收利用及农田氮素平衡的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2011,(6): 25.
	ZOU Xiaojin, ZHANG Xin, AN Jingwen. Effects of nitrogen reduction and backward shift on maize yield, nitrogen absorption and utilization and nitrogen balance in farmland[J]. Soil and Fertilizer in China, 2011,(6):25.
[5]	Xiong S P, Wu Y P, Wang X C et al. Effect of lower nitrogen application on dry matter accumulation and nitrogen translocation of different wheat varieties[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2015, 35(8):1134.
[6]	刘长旭, 张静, 张云霞, 等. 化肥减量条件下配施有机肥对设施番茄产量和品质的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2021, 53(2):79-82.
	LIU Changxu, ZHANG Jing, ZHANG Yunxia, et al. Effects of combined application of organic fertilizer on Yield and quality of protected tomato under the condition of chemical fertilizer reduction[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 53 (2): 79-82.
[7]	张娟. 种植密度和氮肥水平互作对冬小麦产量和氮素利用率的调控效应研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2014.
	ZHANG Juan. Effects of interaction between planting density and nitrogen fertilizer level on Yield and nitrogen use efficiency of winter wheat[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2014.
[8]	李升东, 张卫峰, 王法宏, 等. 施氮量对小麦氮素利用的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2016, 36(2): 223-230.
	LI Shengdong, ZHANG Weifeng, WANG Fahong, et al. Effect of nitrogen application rate on nitrogen utilization of wheat[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2016, 36(2): 223-230.
[9]	朱明哲, 吴国梁, 翟素琴, 等. 三种土壤基础肥力不同施氮量对优质小麦产量及品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2004, 10(6):561-567.
	ZHU Mingzhe, WU Guoliang, ZHAI Suqin, et al. Effects of different nitrogen application rates on the yield and quality of high-quality wheat in three kinds of soil basic fertility[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2004, 10(6): 561-567.
[10]	祁静玉, 蒋桂英, 李彦旬. 减量施氮对滴灌春小麦群体结构和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(4):609-617. DOI
	QI Jingyu, JIANG Guiying, LI Yanxun. Effects of reduced nitrogen application on population structure and yield of spring wheat under drip irrigation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55 (4): 609-617.
[11]	孙婷, 张建芳, 石元强, 等. 氮素运筹对滴灌春小麦氮素吸收、利用及产量的影响[J]. 塔里木大学学报, 2019, 31(4):29-40.
	SUN Ting, ZHANG Jianfang, SHI yuanqiang, et al. Effects of nitrogen management on nitrogen absorption, utilization and yield of spring wheat under drip irrigation[J]. Journal of Tarim University, 2019, 31(4): 29-40.
[12]	吴晓丽, 李朝苏, 汤永禄, 等. 氮肥运筹对小麦产量、氮素利用效率和光能利用率的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(6): 1889-1898.
	WU Xiaoli, LI Chaosu, TANG Yonglu, et al. Effects of nitrogen use efficiency and light energy utilization rate on wheat yield[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28 (6): 1889-1898.
[13]	黄严帅, 范袁斌, 李炳生, 等. 氮肥运筹对弱筋小麦宁麦9号群体结构和产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报. 2008, 24(9): 122-126.
	HUANG Yanshuai, FAN Yuanbin, LI Bingsheng, et al. Effects of nitrogen management on population structure and yield of Weak Gluten Wheat Ningmai 9[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2008, 24(9): 122-126.
[14]	于文明, 于振文, 魏守江. 施氮量和基本苗对小麦干物质积累量和产量及氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 山东农业科学. 2006(4): 35-37.
	YU Wenming, YU Zhenwen, WEI Shoujiang. Effects of nitrogen application rate and basic seedlings on dry matter accumulation, yield and nitrogen use efficiency of wheat[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2006 (4): 35-37.
[15]	李瑞奇, 李雁鸣, 何建兴, 等. 施氮量对冬小麦氮素利用和产量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报. 2011, 31(2): 270-275.
	LI Ruiqi, LI Yanming, HE Jianxing, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rate on nitrogen utilization and yield of winter wheat[J]. Journal of TriticeaeCrops, 2011, 31(2): 270-275.
[16]	石元强, 张迪, 孙婷, 等. 氮肥运筹对滴灌春小麦干物质积累及产量特征的调控效应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(6):1022-1031. DOI
	SHI Yuanqiang, ZHANG Di, SUN Ting, et al. Regulation effect of nitrogen management on dry matter accumulation and yield characteristics of spring wheat under drip irrigation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(6): 1022-1031. DOI
[17]	张向前, 杜世州, 曹承富, 等. 种植密度对小麦群体质量叶绿素荧光参数和产量的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2014, 32(5):93-99.
	ZHANG Xiangqian, DU Shizhou, CAO Chengfu, et al. Effects of planting density on population quality, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and yield of wheat[J]. Agricultural Research in Arid Areas, 2014, 32(5): 93-99.
[18]	钱兆国, 吴科, 王瑞霞, 等. 节水条件下不同播期密度设计对不同品种冬小麦群体生长特性和产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(27):124-129.
	QIAN Zhaoguo, WU Ke, WANG Ruixia, et al. Effects of density design at different sowing dates on population growth characteristics and yield of Different Winter Wheat Varieties under water-saving conditions[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2012, 28(27): 124-129.
[19]	黄艺华, 蒋桂英, 王海琪, 等. 氮肥基追比对滴灌春小麦群体质量及产量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2021, 30(6):807-818.
	HUANG Yihua, JIANG Guiying, WANG Haiqi, et al. Effects of base topdressing ratio of nitrogen fertilizer on population quality and yield of spring wheat under drip irrigation[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2021, 30(6): 807-818.
[20]	高聚林, 刘克礼, 刘瑞香, 等. 不同栽培条件对春小麦叶面积指数的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2003,(3):85-89.
	GAO Julin, LIU Keli, LIU Ruixiang, et al. Effects of different cultivation conditions on leaf area index of spring wheat[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2003,(3): 85-89.

项目 Item	指标 Index	出苗-拔节 Emergence -Jointing	拔节-孕穗 Jointing -Flowering	孕穗-开花 Booting stage -Flowering	开花-成熟 Flowering -Maturity	全生育期 Whole growth period
水分 Water	分配比例(%)	25	30	20	25	100
	灌水量(m³/hm²)	1 050~1 125	1 260~1 500	840~1 350	1 050~1 125	4 200~4 500
	灌水次数	2	2	1	2	7
氮肥N Fertilizer	R₁	25	38.5	16.5	20	100
	R₂	25	33	22	20	100
	R₃	25	27.5	27.5	20	100
	随水施肥次数	1	1	1	1	4

项目 Item	指标 Index	出苗-拔节 Emergence -Jointing	拔节-孕穗 Jointing -Flowering	孕穗-开花 Booting stage -Flowering	开花-成熟 Flowering -Maturity	全生育期 Whole growth period
水分 Water	分配比例(%)	25	30	20	25	100
	灌水量(m³/hm²)	1 050~1 125	1 260~1 500	840~1 350	1 050~1 125	4 200~4 500
	灌水次数	2	2	1	2	7
氮肥N Fertilizer	R₁	25	38.5	16.5	20	100
	R₂	25	33	22	20	100
	R₃	25	27.5	27.5	20	100
	随水施肥次数	1	1	1	1	4

变异来源 Origin of variance	平方和 Sum of squares	自由度 df	均方 Equal squares	F值 F-value	P值 P-value
氮肥减量Nitrogen reduction	207 583.978	2	103 791.989	0.306	0.739
运筹比例Operational ratio	3 206 751.874 763	2	1 603 375.937	4.735	0.021
施氮量×运筹比例Nitrogen reduction×Operational ratio	8 460 058.199	8	1 057 507.275	9.796	0
误差Error	1 834 250.271	18	101 902.793
总变异Total variance	13 708 644.32	30

变异来源 Origin of variance	平方和 Sum of squares	自由度 df	均方 Equal squares	F值 F-value	P值 P-value
氮肥减量Nitrogen reduction	207 583.978	2	103 791.989	0.306	0.739
运筹比例Operational ratio	3 206 751.874 763	2	1 603 375.937	4.735	0.021
施氮量×运筹比例Nitrogen reduction×Operational ratio	8 460 058.199	8	1 057 507.275	9.796	0
误差Error	1 834 250.271	18	101 902.793
总变异Total variance	13 708 644.32	30

氮肥减量 NR (kg/hm²)	运筹比列 Operational Comparison	穗数 Spike number (10⁴/hm²)	千粒重 1000-grain weight (g)	穗粒数 Kernel No. (No./spike)	产量 Yield (kg/hm²)
N₁	R₁	595.59^ab	52.57^a	25.20^c	6 803.67^cde
	R₂	579.67^ab	43.15^c	32.90^a	7 043.69^bcd
	R₃	500.03^bc	43.57^bc	33.10^a	7 303.70^bc
N₂	R₁	587.08^ab	44.99^bc	30.87^ab	6 830.34^cde
	R₂	475.59^c	44.23^bc	33.23^a	7 460.37^b
	R₃	592.26^ab	46.23^bc	28.73^b	7 477.04^b
N₃	R₁	591.89^ab	46.95^bc	29.20^b	6 647.00^de
	R₂	623.00^a	45.82^bc	29.17^b	8 337.08^a
	R₃	604.85^ab	48.97^b	25.33^c	6 313.65^e

减氮下运筹养分吸收高峰期追施比例对春小麦的影响

Effects of chasing rate during peak nutrient uptake of transport under n Reduction on spring wheat

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 20

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

处理 Treatment	干物质积累量Dry matter accumulation(kg/hm²)
处理 Treatment	拔节期 Jointing stage	开花期 Flowering stage	灌浆期 Filling stage	成熟期 Maturity stage
N₁R₁	5 654.13^bc	10 758.02^c	12 604.96^d	17 021.07^bcd
N₁R₂	5 975.42^ab	11 147.13^c	14 382.00^c	18 299.00^abc
N₁R₃	6 439.52^a	12 642.44^b	15 907.89^b	18 781.37^ab
N₂R₁	6 157.62^a	12 644.18^b	16 542.71^b	17 413.53^bc
N₂R₂	6 384.56^a	13 793.05^ab	18 272.80^a	18 804.57^ab
N₂R₃	5 323.86^c	9 985.61^c	14 051.49^cd	16 380.17^cd
N₃R₁	6 194.55^a	10 260.06^c	12 601.68^de	16 294.13^cd
N₃R₂	6 492.94^a	11 367.08^c	13 673.66^cde	20 069.93^a
N₃R₃	5 654.01^bc	9 825.81^c	12 459.72^e	14 785.17^d

处理 Treatment	花前同化物Assimilate before anthesis			花后同化物Assimilate after anthesis
处理 Treatment	转运量 Transportation (kg/hm²)	转运率 Transshipment rate (%)	对籽粒贡献率 Contribution rate (%)	转运量 Transportation (kg/hm²)	对籽粒贡献率 Contribution rate (%)
N₁R₁	1 635.52^bcd	15.19^bc	20.69^b	6 263.04^a	68.69^ab
N₁R₂	1 223.53^d	10.98^c	14.75^b	7 068.53^a	71.34^ab
N₁R₃	1 579.28^bcd	12.50^c	20.51^b	6 138.92^a	55.53^c
N₂R₁	2 173.92^abc	15.78^bc	37.77^a	3 620.48^c	31.51^d
N₂R₂	2 614.35^a	20.85^ab	29.39^a	6 284.79^a	63.48^bc
N₂R₃	996.58^d	9.84^c	13.71^b	6 094.55^a	71.48^ab
N₃R₁	1 488.32^cd	15.01^bc	18.86^b	6 468.32^a	77.48^a
N₃R₂	1 638.68^bcd	14.58^bc	18.74^b	7 036.18^a	72.88^ab
N₃R₃	2 242.32^ab	22.91^a	31.10^a	4 959.35^b	65.70^abc

[1]	陈茂光, 林涛, 张昊, 刘海军, 王一帆, 汤秋香. 地膜类型对棉花生长的影响及自身降解和回收特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108.
[2]	杨国江, 陈云, 林祥群, 何江勇, 刘盛林, 曲永清. 氮肥减施下有机肥替代对滴灌棉花产量、氮素吸收利用及土壤硝态氮的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145.
[3]	陈传信, 张永强, 聂石辉, 孔德鹏, 赛力汗·赛, 徐其江, 雷钧杰. 生物质炭施用量对滴灌冬小麦生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2146-2151.
[4]	王立红, 张宏芝, 张跃强, 李剑峰, 王重, 高新, 时佳, 王春生, 夏建强, 樊哲儒. 不同产量水平冬小麦产量差异形成的干物质生产、转运及氮肥利用分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2152-2162.
[5]	王晓雨, 王小平, 史文宇, 刘美艳, 马健, 郭云鹏, 宋瑞欣, 王清涛. 拔节期冬小麦光合特性、干物质积累和产量对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2163-2172.
[6]	向莉, 王仙, 董裕生, 郭小玲, 方伏荣, 陈智军, 马艳明, 苗雨. 外源丁酸对干旱胁迫下大麦产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2173-2181.
[7]	杨红梅, 张跃强, 史应武, 吾买尔江·库尔班, 林青, 王宁, 楚敏, 曾军. 不同类型叶面肥喷施对冬小麦籽粒产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2182-2188.
[8]	马明杰, 赵经华, 李冬民, 杨胜春, 王克贤, 李池. 不同灌溉方式对苜蓿土壤水分与灌溉水利用效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2306-2313.
[9]	王心, 林涛, 崔建平, 吴凤全, 唐志轩, 崔来园, 郭仁松, 王亮, 郑子漂. 种植模式与灌溉定额对机采长绒棉产量及纤维品质形成的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1821-1829.
[10]	董艳雪, 贾永红, 张金汕, 李丹丹, 王凯, 罗四维, 王润琪, 石书兵. 不同生态区环境下春小麦干物质积累及产量形成分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1848-1857.
[11]	张超, 白云岗, 郑明, 肖军, 丁平. 极端干旱区葡萄水肥协同效应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1931-1939.
[12]	王挺, 张力, 张凡凡, 黄嵘峥, 李肖, 张玉琳, 陈永成, 赵建涛, 马春晖. 适合青贮的玉米品种生产性能筛选及营养价值评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1596-1605.
[13]	梁志国, 王泽鹏, 贾宋楠, 范凤翠, 刘胜尧, 张哲, 杜凤焕, 秦勇. 不同土壤水分对设施茄子生长、产量、品质及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1713-1721.
[14]	张永强, 陈传信, 徐其江, 聂石辉, 雷钧杰, 刘昌文. 氮肥增效剂与氮肥减量配施对冬小麦叶片生理及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1319-1325.
[15]	赖宁, 耿庆龙, 李永福, 李娜, 信会男, 步生兵, 陈署晃. 有机无机配施对超晚播冬小麦产量、氮磷养分吸收利用及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1335-1343.