氟节胺与缩节胺施用时间对棉花株型及其经济性状的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.05.003

新疆农业科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (5): 802-813.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.05.003

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学·耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇下一篇

氟节胺与缩节胺施用时间对棉花株型及其经济性状的影响

史亚辉, 蔡晓虎, 韩睿, 张玉栋, 王俊刚

石河子大学农学院/绿洲农业病虫害治理与植保资源利用重点实验室,新疆石河子 832003

收稿日期:2020-05-13 出版日期:2021-05-20 发布日期:2021-05-26
通信作者: 王俊刚(1970-),男,甘肃秦安人,教授,研究生导师,研究方向为植物保护,(E-mail)wangjungang98@163.com
作者简介:史亚辉(1994-),男,新疆博尔塔拉人,硕士研究生,研究方向为植物保护,(E-mail)372999623@qq.com
基金资助:
兵团重大科技项目(2018AA06-02);国家自然科学基金(31660519)

Effects of Application Time of Flumetralin and Mepiquat Chloride on Cotton Plant Type and Economic Characters

SHI Yahui, CAI Xiaohu, HAN Rui, ZHANG Yudong, WANG Jungang

Key Laboratory for Oasis Agricultural Pest Management and Plant Resource Utilization, College of Agronomy/ Shihezi University, Shihezi Xinjiang 832003,China

Received:2020-05-13 Online:2021-05-20 Published:2021-05-26
Correspondence author: WANG Jungang (1970-), male, native place: Qinan Gansu, Professor and master tutor of Shihezi University, research field: plant protection, (E-mail) wangjungang98@163.com
Supported by:
Major S & T Project of XPCC(2018AA06-02)and the Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (31660519)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】研究氟节胺与缩节胺施用时间对棉花株型及其经济性状的影响,筛选出棉花化学封顶和前期调控塑形最佳时间。【方法】采用裂区试验设计,以棉花不同时间封顶施药为主区,封顶前不同时间施药调控为副区,人工打顶为对照,测定棉花株高、叶枝长、果枝长、节间长、结铃数、单铃重、实收产量以及纤维品质指标。【结果】棉田施用2次氟节胺与缩节胺进行棉花调控和封顶。棉花株高和叶枝增长量均低于人工打顶,并且2次施药间隔期越长则棉花株高增长量越少,倒1、倒2、倒3主茎节间距显著短于对照(P＜0.05),棉花倒1、倒2、倒3、倒4果枝长度较对照缩短61.57%~70.57%。棉花不同部位结铃数表现为下部铃＞中部铃＞上部铃,且主要集中于棉花下部。随着2次施药间隔期缩短,棉花单株铃数、单铃重有增加趋势,而7月15日封顶棉花的单铃重呈减少趋势,但与对照(CK0-5、CK0-10、CK0-15)无差异(P＞0.05)。【结论】2次施药间隔期对棉花纤维品质指标也有一定影响。在6月30日和7月10日2次施药可以达到棉花化学封顶效果,有助于高光效群体形成。

关键词: 棉花; 氟节胺; 缩节胺; 施用时间; 株型; 经济性状

Abstract: 【Objective】 This study aims to examine the effects of application time of Flumetralin and Mepiquat chloride on plant type and economic characters of cotton, In order to screen out the optimal time for chemical capping and pre-regulation and shaping of cotton. 【Methods】 The split-plot experiment design was carried out in this experiment to determine the plant height, leaf branch length, fruit branch length, internode length, boll number, boll weight, single boll weight, yield and fiber quality index of cotton capping period as the main plot, cotton with different time before capping as secondary zone and artificial topping as control. 【Results】 Flumetralin and Mepiquat chloride were administered twice in cotton field for cotton regulation and capping. The plant height and leaf branch growth of cotton chemical capping were lower than those of artificial topping. The longer the two-period application period of plant growth regulators mixed with Flumetralin and Mepiquat chloride, the shorter the cotton plant height growth. The distance between main stem nodes of cotton inverted one, inverted two, and inverted three was significantly shorter than that of the control (P <0.05), and the length of the fruit branches of inverted one, inverted two, and inverted three was 61.57% -70.57% shorter than the control. The number of cotton bolls in different parts of cotton was as follows: lower boll > middle boll > top boll, and it was mainly concentrated in the lower part of cotton. With the shortening of the interval between the two treatments, the number of bolls per plant and the weight of single boll increased, while the single boll weight of cotton capped on July 15 decreased, but there were no significant difference between each treatment and control (CK0-5, CK0-10, CK0-15)(P>0.05). 【Conclusion】 The interval of two applications also had certain influence on cotton fiber quality index. According to weight of seed and lint yield of cotton, the plant growth regulators mixed with Flumetralin and Mepiquat chloride sprayed twice on June 30th and July 10th can cause cotton to cap itself and help the formation of higher light efficiency groups.

Key words: cotton; flumetralin; mepiquat chloride; application time; plant type; economic characters

中图分类号:

S562

史亚辉, 蔡晓虎, 韩睿, 张玉栋, 王俊刚. 氟节胺与缩节胺施用时间对棉花株型及其经济性状的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(5): 802-813.

SHI Yahui, CAI Xiaohu, HAN Rui, ZHANG Yudong, WANG Jungang. Effects of Application Time of Flumetralin and Mepiquat Chloride on Cotton Plant Type and Economic Characters[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(5): 802-813.

参考文献 24

[1]	董合忠, 李维江, 唐薇, 等. 棉花生理性早衰研究进展[J]. 棉花学报, 2005, 17(1): 56-60.DONG Hezhong, LI Weijiang, TANG Wei, et al. Research progress in physiological premature senescence in cotton [J]. Cotton Science, 2005, 17(1): 56-60.
[2]	董合忠, 毛树春, 张旺锋, 等. 棉花优化成铃栽培理论及其新发展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(3): 441-451.DONG Hezhong, MAO Shuchun, ZHANG Wangfeng, et al. On boll-setting optimization theory for cotton cultivation and its new development [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(3): 441-451.
[3]	苏成付, 邱新棉, 王世林. 烟草抑芽剂氟节胺在棉花打顶上的应用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2012, 24(4): 545-548.SU Chengfu, QIU Xinmian, WANG Shilin. Utilization study on application of tobacco suckercides flumetralin in cotton topping [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2012, 24(4): 545-548.
[4]	徐宇强, 张静, 管利军, 等. 化学打顶对东疆棉花生长发育主要性状的影响[J]. 中国棉花, 2014, 41(2): 30-31, 38.XU Yuqiang, ZHANG Jing, GUAN Lijun, et al. Effects of chemical detopping on main traits of cotton growth in East Xinjiang [J]. China Cotton, 2014, 41(2): 30-31, 38.
[5]	赵强, 周春江, 张巨松, 等. 化学打顶对南疆棉花农艺和经济性状的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2011, 23(4): 329-333.ZHAO Qiang, ZHOU Chunjiang, ZHANG Jusong, et al. Effect of chemical detopping on the canopy and yield of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) in South Xinjiang [J]. Cotton Science, 2011, 23(4): 329-333.
[6]	戴翠荣, 练文明, 李子, 等. 南疆棉区氟节胺化学打顶技术初探[J]. 中国棉花, 2013, 40(9): 31-33.DAI Cuirong, LIAN Wenming, LI Zi, et al. Study on cotton chemical topping technology of flumetralin [J]. China Cotton, 2013, 40(9): 31-33.
[7]	韩焕勇. 北疆棉区棉花增效缩节胺化学封顶技术及其机理研究[D]. 北京:中国农业大学, 2016.HAN Huanyong. Study on the technical and mechanism of no topping by efficiency DPC application in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in North Xinjiang [D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2016.
[8]	叶春秀, 庄振刚, 李有忠, 等. 北疆早熟陆地棉化学打顶效果研究[J]. 西北农业学报, 2015, 24(1): 91-96. YE Chunxiu, ZHUANG Zhengang, LI Youzhong, et al. Effect of chemical de-topping on early maturing upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) in Northern Xinjiang [J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2015, 24(1): 91-96.
[9]	Donald C M. The breeding of crop ideotypes [J]. Euphytica, 1968, 17(3): 385-403.
[10]	谈春松. 棉花株型栽培研究. [J]. 中国农业科学, 1993, 26(4): 36-43.TAN Chunsong. On ideotype cultivation of cotton [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 1993, 26 (4): 36-43.
[11]	南殿杰, 赵海祯, 吴云康. 棉花株型栽培的增产机理及技术研究[J]. 棉花学报,1995, 7(4): 238-242.NAN Dianjie, ZHAO Haizhen, WU Yunkang. Mechanism of increasing yield and its technical studies for cotton plant pattern cultivation [J]. Acta Gossypii Sinica, 1995, 7(4): 238-242.
[12]	Siebert J D, Stewartd A M. Influence of plant density on cotton response to mepiquat chloride application [J]. Agronomy Journal, 2006, 98(6): 1634-1639.
[13]	Reddy V R, Trent A, Acock B. Mepiquat chloride and irrigation versus cotton growth and development [J]. Agronomy Journal, 1992, 84(6): 930-933.
[14]	安静, 黎芳, 周春江, 等. 增效缩节胺化学封顶对棉花主茎生长的影响及其相关机制[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(12): 1837-1843. AN Jing, LI Fang, ZHOU Chunjiang, et al. Morpho-physiological responses of cotton shoot apex t-o the chemical topping with fortified mepiquat chloride [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(12): 1837-1843.
[15]	陈兵, 王静, 王刚, 等. 土优塔化学打顶剂对新疆棉花农艺性状及经济特性的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2017, 48(6): 991-996. CHEN Bing, WANG Jing, WANG Gang, et al. Chemical topping agent Toyouta on agronomic traits and economical characters of cotton in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2017, 48(6): 991-996.
[16]	娄善伟, 康正华, 赵强, 等. 化学封顶高产棉花株型研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2015, 52(7): 1328-1333. LOU Shanwei, KANG Zhenghua, ZHAO Qiang, et al. Study on plant type of high yield cotton after chemical detopping [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 52(7): 1328-1333.
[17]	孙国军, 李克富, 彭延. 南疆棉区棉花利用氟节胺打顶技术试验[J]. 棉花科学, 2014, 36(2): 23-25. SUN Guojun, LI Kefu, PENG Yan. Test of topping technology by using flumetralin in Southern Xinjiang cotton region [J]. Cotton Sciences, 2014, 36(2): 23-25.
[18]	魏海燕, 凌启鸿, 张洪程, 等. 作物群体质量及其关键调控技术[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2018, 39(2): 1-9. WEI Haiyan, LING Qihong, ZHANG Hongcheng, et al. The quality of crop population and its key regulation technology [J]. Journal of Yangzhou University (Agricultural and Life Science Ed.), 2018, 39(2): 1-9.
[19]	董春玲, 罗宏海, 张亚黎, 等. 喷施氟节胺对棉花农艺性状的影响及化学打顶效应研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2013, 50(11): 1985-1990. DONG Chunling, LUO Honghai, ZHANG Yali, et al. Research on cotton agronomic traits and chemical topping effect after spraying flumetralin [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 50(11): 1985-1990.
[20]	杨成勋. 化学打顶对棉花植株形态、冠层结构及群体光合生产的影响[D]. 石河子:石河子大学,2016.YANG Chengxun. Effects of chemical topping on plant morphological, canopy structure, and canopy photosynthetic production of cotton [D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2016.
[21]	Gwathmey C O, Clement J D. Alteration of cotton source sink relations with plant population density and mepiquat chloride [J]. Field Crops Research, 2010, 116(1): 101-107.
[22]	冯国艺, 罗宏海, 姚炎帝, 等. 新疆超高产棉花叶、铃空间分布及与群体光合生产的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(13): 2607-2617. FENG Guoyi, LUO Honghai, YAO Yandi, et al. Spatial distribution of leaf and boll in relation to canopy photosynthesis of super high-yielding cotton in Xinjiang [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(13): 2607-2617.
[23]	王刚, 张鑫, 陈兵, 等. 新疆第七师130团土优塔棉花化学打顶剂效果试验研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(33): 67-68.WANG Gang, ZHANG Xin, CHEN Bing, et al. Effect test of toyota-cotton topping agent in Xinjiang Seventh Division 130 Group [J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 43(33): 67-68.
[24]	陈金湘. 棉铃形成过程中花器形态量变规律的研究[J]. 棉花学报, 2002, 14(4): 204-208.CHEN Jinxiang. Studied on floral organ quantitative change rules in progressive development of cotton boll [J]. Cotton Science, 2002, 14(4): 204-208.

氟节胺与缩节胺施用时间对棉花株型及其经济性状的影响

Effects of Application Time of Flumetralin and Mepiquat Chloride on Cotton Plant Type and Economic Characters

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 24

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	陈茂光, 林涛, 张昊, 刘海军, 王一帆, 汤秋香. 地膜类型对棉花生长的影响及自身降解和回收特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108.
[2]	杨川, 张凯, 陈冰, 张慧, 柳萍, 常松, 盛建东. 棉花植株形态特征对不同水分状况的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2120-2127.
[3]	杨国江, 陈云, 林祥群, 何江勇, 刘盛林, 曲永清. 氮肥减施下有机肥替代对滴灌棉花产量、氮素吸收利用及土壤硝态氮的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145.
[4]	李雪玲, 郭俊先, 陈莉, 宋鹤岭, 张众. 不同覆膜宽度对棉花农田环境的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1840-1847.
[5]	阳妮, 玛依拉·玉素音, 杨延龙, 李春平, 张大伟, 徐海江, 赖成霞. 黄萎病枯斑型与黄化型病症棉花叶片的植物挥发物对比[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1975-1986.
[6]	米尔扎提·木塔力甫, 石秀楠, 柏军兵, 祖拜代·阿布都克日木, 吾勒加勒哈斯·阿扎提, 石书兵. 不同脱绒方式及PEG胁迫下对棉花种子活力及幼苗性状的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1561-1568.
[7]	江柱, 张江辉, 白云岗, 杨鹏年, 刘洪波, 肖军, 刘旭辉. 膜下咸水滴灌水肥盐调控对棉花生长及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1389-1397.
[8]	王文涛, 吴博, 邰红忠, 练文明, 戴翠荣, 李双江, 蒲艳梅. 新疆阿拉尔垦区不同播期对棉花生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1413-1422.
[9]	桑志伟, 梁亚军, 龚照龙, 郑巨云, 王俊铎, 李雪源, 陈全家. 不同陆地棉种质资源机采性状分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1088-1098.
[10]	逯涛, 曾庆涛, 张文, 王文博, 王政洋, 杨芮, 孙玉岩. 主成分分析及灰色关联度分析综合评价棉花产量与品质[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1099-1109.
[11]	申莹莹, 张巨松, 彭增莹, 段松江, 李宗润, 吴一帆. 缩节胺复配打顶剂对机采棉冠层结构、光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1110-1117.
[12]	王宁, 史应武, 牛新湘, 杨红梅, 楚敏, 詹发强, 包慧芳, 杨蓉, 龙宣杞, 丁荣荣. 棉花根际溶磷菌WJP-7发酵培养基优化及防病增产效果[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1263-1270.
[13]	张泓, 吐尔逊江·买买提, 张少民, 张军高, 周小云. 近30 a全国棉花生产区域时空变化及区域优势分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 1028-1040.
[14]	彭增莹, 张巨松, 卡地力亚·阿不都克力木, 贺宏伟, 刘群, 郭仁松. 氮肥与缩节胺对机采棉生长发育及氮素分布的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 781-789.
[15]	申莹莹, 张巨松, 彭增莹, 李宗润, 段松江, 吴一帆, 郭仁松. 缩节胺复配打顶剂对机采棉株型塑造和棉铃分布的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 790-797.