新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (10): 2558-2565.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.10.026
成臣1(), 鄢雨蛟1, 曾文愉1, 廖雅汶1, 高志强1, 卢占军1, 姚锋先1(), 朱博1, 汪建军2
收稿日期:
2023-01-23
出版日期:
2023-10-20
发布日期:
2023-11-01
通信作者:
姚锋先(1980-),男,副教授,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向为蔬菜生理与栽培, (E-mail) 作者简介:
成臣(1990-),男,江西德安人,讲师,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向为蔬菜生理与栽培, (E-mail)chengchenzxm@163.com
基金资助:
CHENG Chen1(), YAN Yujiao1, ZENG Wenyu1, LIAO Yawen1, GAO Zhiqiang1, LU Zhanjun1, YAO Fengxian1(), ZHU Bo1, WANG Jianjun2
Received:
2023-01-23
Online:
2023-10-20
Published:
2023-11-01
Correspondence author:
YAO Fengxian(1980-), male, associate professor, doctoral, master supervisor, research direction in vegetable physiology and cultivation technology, (E-mail) Supported by:
摘要:
【目的】 研究喷施赤霉素缓解多效唑对叶用莴苣幼苗抑制作用。【方法】 采用叶用莴苣不同品种与不同质量浓度的赤霉素进行双因素完全随机试验设计,采用5个叶用莴苣品种,赤霉素质量浓度以有效成分计,分别设A1(0 mg/L)、A2(15 mg/L)、A3(30 mg/L)、A4(60 mg/L)、A5(120 mg/L)、A6(240 mg/L)和A7(480 mg/L)共7种喷施水平,于叶用莴苣移栽期测定幼苗素质、叶形及叶片可溶性固形物含量。【结果】 随赤霉素质量浓度增加,各叶用莴苣品种的株高、根鲜重、根干重、地上部鲜重、地上部干重、总叶面积、总叶长、总叶宽、最大功能叶叶长及最大功能叶叶宽均先增后降,各指标值均在A5处理时达最大,与A1处理相比,A5处理各指标分别增加36.8%~86.6%、30.1%~53.4%、21.1%~77.7%、56.2%~127.3%、56.0%~115.5%、63.4%~142.1%、30.4%~79.5%、27.0%~65.7%、24.0%~50.0%及21.8%~48.8%。可溶性固形物也呈现先增后降的趋势,以A2处理、A3处理表现最佳。叶用莴苣各品种SPAD值及根冠比先降后增,各指标值均为A5处理最低,与A1处理相比,A5处理各指标分别降低17.6%~28.6%及17.5%~36.2%。【结论】 喷施赤霉素具有缓解多效唑抑制的作用,其中赤霉素质量浓度在A5(120 mg/L)时对叶用莴苣幼苗的调控效果最佳。
中图分类号:
成臣, 鄢雨蛟, 曾文愉, 廖雅汶, 高志强, 卢占军, 姚锋先, 朱博, 汪建军. 喷施赤霉素缓解多效唑对叶用莴苣幼苗的抑制作用[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2558-2565.
CHENG Chen, YAN Yujiao, ZENG Wenyu, LIAO Yawen, GAO Zhiqiang, LU Zhanjun, YAO Fengxian, ZHU Bo, WANG Jianjun. Spraying gibberellin to alleviate the Inhibition of paclobutrazol on leaf lettuce seedlings[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(10): 2558-2565.
品种 Variety | 处理 Treat- ment | 株高 Height (cm) | SPAD值 SPAD value | 根鲜重 Root fresh weight(g) | 根干重 Root dry weight(g) | 地上部鲜重 Shoot fresh weight(g) | 地上部干重 Shoot dry weight(g) | 根冠比 Root shoot ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
奶油生菜 Butter lettuce | A1 | 2.1±0.1c | 20.8±1.8a | 0.44±0.02d | 0.036±0.001a | 0.53±0.04e | 0.061±0.005e | 0.59±0.05a |
A2 | 2.4±0.2b | 18.4±1.1c | 0.47±0.0 | 0.038±0.004a | 0.62±0.0 | 0.070±0.003d | 0.54±0.0 | |
A3 | 2.6±0.1ab | 17.9±0.8bc | 0.52±0.03abc | 0.042±0.006a | 0.82±0.05abc | 0.087±0.010ab | 0.48±0.06ab | |
A4 | 2.8±0.2a | 17.7±1.9bc | 0.55±0.02ab | 0.043±0.009a | 0.84±0.09ab | 0.091±0.008ab | 0.47±0.07b | |
A5 | 2.9±0.2a | 17.0±0.6c | 0.57±0.06a | 0.044±0.005a | 0.89±0.09a | 0.095±0.005a | 0.46±0.05b | |
A6 | 2.6±0.2ab | 20.0±1ab | 0.49±0.05bcd | 0.040±0.002a | 0.74±0.05bc | 0.085±0.005bc | 0.47±0.05b | |
A7 | 2.4±0.2bc | 21.2±0.6a | 0.46±0.05cd | 0.037±0.004a | 0.72±0.06cd | 0.076±0.004cd | 0.49±0.08ab | |
CV(%) | 10.4 | 8.7 | 9.7 | 7.5 | 17.5 | 15.1 | 9.8 | |
耐抽薹 生菜 Bolting to lerance lettuce | A1 | 2.2±0.1d | 23.5±1.2a | 0.48±0.03e | 0.032±0.006c | 0.57±0.03d | 0.059±0.004d | 0.55±0.05a |
A2 | 2.6±0.1bc | 21.1±1.5b | 0.58±0.03bc | 0.040±0.003ab | 0.76±0.05bc | 0.083±0.008abc | 0.49±0.09ab | |
A3 | 2.7±0.1b | 20.8±0.5bc | 0.60±0.02bc | 0.041±0.004ab | 0.83±0.10ab | 0.085±0.009abc | 0.48±0.04ab | |
A4 | 3.0±0.2a | 20.3±1.2bc | 0.63±0.05ab | 0.042±0.003ab | 0.86±0.04ab | 0.090±0.010ab | 0.47±0.05ab | |
A5 | 3.2±0.2a | 18.6±1.0c | 0.65±0.03a | 0.044±0.003a | 0.89±0.07a | 0.096±0.003a | 0.44±0.02b | |
A6 | 2.4±0.1cd | 19.6±1.7bc | 0.55±0.03cd | 0.038±0.003abc | 0.71±0.05c | 0.078±0.006bc | 0.48±0.07ab | |
A7 | 2.3±0.2d | 20.9±1.4bc | 0.53±0.03de | 0.037±0.002bc | 0.64±0.06cd | 0.075±0.008c | 0.50±0.03ab | |
CV(%) | 14.1 | 7.3 | 10.3 | 9.8 | 15.7 | 15.1 | 6.3 | |
玻璃生菜 Lceberg lettuce | A1 | 2.2±0.1e | 23.8±2.3a | 0.54±0.07c | 0.044±0.008b | 0.61±0.07e | 0.059±0.004d | 0.74±0.07a |
A2 | 2.7±0.2cd | 21.2±0.7ab | 0.64±0.05b | 0.053±0.007ab | 0.85±0.08cd | 0.095±0.009c | 0.56±0.08b | |
A3 | 3.6±0.1b | 20.5±2.0bc | 0.68±0.03ab | 0.057±0.002a | 0.97±0.09bc | 0.104±0.005bc | 0.55±0.01b | |
A4 | 3.7±0.2b | 17.6±1.1d | 0.70±0.03ab | 0.059±0.009a | 1.05±0.08ab | 0.109±0.006ab | 0.54±0.03b | |
A5 | 4.2±0.1a | 17.0±0.7d | 0.74±0.07a | 0.062±0.006a | 1.17±0.08a | 0.120±0.012a | 0.52±0.02b | |
A6 | 3.0±0.2c | 17.3±1.3d | 0.66±0.03ab | 0.056±0.004a | 0.89±0.08cd | 0.106±0.008bc | 0.53±0.03b | |
A7 | 2.5±0.2de | 18.5±0.6cd | 0.62±0.06bc | 0.054±0.003ab | 0.77±0.06d | 0.101±0.001bc | 0.54±0.02b | |
CV(%) | 22.7 | 13.0 | 9.6 | 10.5 | 20.5 | 19.5 | 13.6 | |
罗马直立 生菜 Roman upright lettuce | A1 | 1.9±0.1d | 30.8±0.3a | 0.46±0.01e | 0.034±0.002c | 0.55±0.05d | 0.068±0.011e | 0.50±0.04a |
A2 | 2.3±0.2c | 28.3±0.2b | 0.53±0.05cde | 0.047±0.001b | 0.67±0.04cd | 0.099±0.004d | 0.48±0.01ab | |
A3 | 2.7±0.1ab | 27.8±1.7bc | 0.58±0.09bcd | 0.049±0.008b | 0.69±0.02c | 0.104±0.008cd | 0.47±0.05ab | |
A4 | 2.9±0.2a | 26.0±0.6d | 0.62±0.02abc | 0.056±0.005ab | 0.92±0.08b | 0.120±0.006bc | 0.46±0.03ab | |
A5 | 3.0±0.1a | 25.4±1.2d | 0.71±0.09a | 0.061±0.006a | 1.06±0.07a | 0.146±0.008a | 0.41±0.06b | |
A6 | 2.5±0.2bc | 26.6±0.6cd | 0.64±0.12ab | 0.055±0.010ab | 0.84±0.10b | 0.123±0.013b | 0.45±0.05ab | |
A7 | 2.4±0.2bc | 27.9±0.8bc | 0.49±0.05de | 0.046±0.004b | 0.64±0.08cd | 0.097±0.008d | 0.47±0.07ab | |
CV(%) | 15.0 | 6.5 | 15.4 | 17.3 | 23.2 | 22.8 | 5.9 | |
香港软尾 生菜 Hong kong soft tailed lettuce | A1 | 2.3±0.1e | 21.6±1.2a | 0.52±0.06c | 0.041±0.004b | 0.56±0.02c | 0.055±0.010c | 0.75±0.05a |
A2 | 3.1±0.1c | 20.0±1.5abc | 0.66±0.07abc | 0.047±0.003ab | 0.86±0.04b | 0.081±0.020b | 0.58±0.03b | |
A3 | 3.1±0.1bc | 19.5±2.3abc | 0.68±0.06ab | 0.049±0.007ab | 0.90±0.17b | 0.090±0.017b | 0.55±0.06b | |
A4 | 3.3±0.2ab | 18.5±1.1bc | 0.70±0.10ab | 0.051±0.005ab | 0.96±0.08b | 0.096±0.006ab | 0.53±0.03b | |
A5 | 3.4±0.1a | 17.7±0.9c | 0.74±0.10a | 0.056±0.008a | 1.26±0.17a | 0.118±0.010a | 0.48±0.07b | |
A6 | 2.7±0.1d | 18.1±1.1c | 0.62±0.07abc | 0.047±0.007ab | 0.84±0.05b | 0.092±0.018b | 0.51±0.09b | |
A7 | 2.4±0.2e | 20.9±1.3ab | 0.57±0.10bc | 0.044±0.007b | 0.81±0.09b | 0.080±0.009b | 0.55±0.03b | |
CV(%) | 15.1 | 7.6 | 12.0 | 10.2 | 23.8 | 21.8 | 15.4 | |
F值 F value | 品种 (V) | 56.8** | 170.2** | 23.0** | 32.4** | 20.6** | 37.3** | 16.2** |
处理(T) | 95.5** | 24.9** | 18.7** | 12.5** | 59.5** | 52.1** | 14.4** | |
V×T | 4.7** | 1.8* | 0.6 | 0.8 | 2.1* | 1.8* | 1.0 |
表1 多效唑显著抑制下喷施赤霉素叶用莴苣幼苗品质变化
Tab.1 Effects of spraying gibberellin on seedling quality of leaf lettuce under significant inhibition of paclobutrazol
品种 Variety | 处理 Treat- ment | 株高 Height (cm) | SPAD值 SPAD value | 根鲜重 Root fresh weight(g) | 根干重 Root dry weight(g) | 地上部鲜重 Shoot fresh weight(g) | 地上部干重 Shoot dry weight(g) | 根冠比 Root shoot ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
奶油生菜 Butter lettuce | A1 | 2.1±0.1c | 20.8±1.8a | 0.44±0.02d | 0.036±0.001a | 0.53±0.04e | 0.061±0.005e | 0.59±0.05a |
A2 | 2.4±0.2b | 18.4±1.1c | 0.47±0.0 | 0.038±0.004a | 0.62±0.0 | 0.070±0.003d | 0.54±0.0 | |
A3 | 2.6±0.1ab | 17.9±0.8bc | 0.52±0.03abc | 0.042±0.006a | 0.82±0.05abc | 0.087±0.010ab | 0.48±0.06ab | |
A4 | 2.8±0.2a | 17.7±1.9bc | 0.55±0.02ab | 0.043±0.009a | 0.84±0.09ab | 0.091±0.008ab | 0.47±0.07b | |
A5 | 2.9±0.2a | 17.0±0.6c | 0.57±0.06a | 0.044±0.005a | 0.89±0.09a | 0.095±0.005a | 0.46±0.05b | |
A6 | 2.6±0.2ab | 20.0±1ab | 0.49±0.05bcd | 0.040±0.002a | 0.74±0.05bc | 0.085±0.005bc | 0.47±0.05b | |
A7 | 2.4±0.2bc | 21.2±0.6a | 0.46±0.05cd | 0.037±0.004a | 0.72±0.06cd | 0.076±0.004cd | 0.49±0.08ab | |
CV(%) | 10.4 | 8.7 | 9.7 | 7.5 | 17.5 | 15.1 | 9.8 | |
耐抽薹 生菜 Bolting to lerance lettuce | A1 | 2.2±0.1d | 23.5±1.2a | 0.48±0.03e | 0.032±0.006c | 0.57±0.03d | 0.059±0.004d | 0.55±0.05a |
A2 | 2.6±0.1bc | 21.1±1.5b | 0.58±0.03bc | 0.040±0.003ab | 0.76±0.05bc | 0.083±0.008abc | 0.49±0.09ab | |
A3 | 2.7±0.1b | 20.8±0.5bc | 0.60±0.02bc | 0.041±0.004ab | 0.83±0.10ab | 0.085±0.009abc | 0.48±0.04ab | |
A4 | 3.0±0.2a | 20.3±1.2bc | 0.63±0.05ab | 0.042±0.003ab | 0.86±0.04ab | 0.090±0.010ab | 0.47±0.05ab | |
A5 | 3.2±0.2a | 18.6±1.0c | 0.65±0.03a | 0.044±0.003a | 0.89±0.07a | 0.096±0.003a | 0.44±0.02b | |
A6 | 2.4±0.1cd | 19.6±1.7bc | 0.55±0.03cd | 0.038±0.003abc | 0.71±0.05c | 0.078±0.006bc | 0.48±0.07ab | |
A7 | 2.3±0.2d | 20.9±1.4bc | 0.53±0.03de | 0.037±0.002bc | 0.64±0.06cd | 0.075±0.008c | 0.50±0.03ab | |
CV(%) | 14.1 | 7.3 | 10.3 | 9.8 | 15.7 | 15.1 | 6.3 | |
玻璃生菜 Lceberg lettuce | A1 | 2.2±0.1e | 23.8±2.3a | 0.54±0.07c | 0.044±0.008b | 0.61±0.07e | 0.059±0.004d | 0.74±0.07a |
A2 | 2.7±0.2cd | 21.2±0.7ab | 0.64±0.05b | 0.053±0.007ab | 0.85±0.08cd | 0.095±0.009c | 0.56±0.08b | |
A3 | 3.6±0.1b | 20.5±2.0bc | 0.68±0.03ab | 0.057±0.002a | 0.97±0.09bc | 0.104±0.005bc | 0.55±0.01b | |
A4 | 3.7±0.2b | 17.6±1.1d | 0.70±0.03ab | 0.059±0.009a | 1.05±0.08ab | 0.109±0.006ab | 0.54±0.03b | |
A5 | 4.2±0.1a | 17.0±0.7d | 0.74±0.07a | 0.062±0.006a | 1.17±0.08a | 0.120±0.012a | 0.52±0.02b | |
A6 | 3.0±0.2c | 17.3±1.3d | 0.66±0.03ab | 0.056±0.004a | 0.89±0.08cd | 0.106±0.008bc | 0.53±0.03b | |
A7 | 2.5±0.2de | 18.5±0.6cd | 0.62±0.06bc | 0.054±0.003ab | 0.77±0.06d | 0.101±0.001bc | 0.54±0.02b | |
CV(%) | 22.7 | 13.0 | 9.6 | 10.5 | 20.5 | 19.5 | 13.6 | |
罗马直立 生菜 Roman upright lettuce | A1 | 1.9±0.1d | 30.8±0.3a | 0.46±0.01e | 0.034±0.002c | 0.55±0.05d | 0.068±0.011e | 0.50±0.04a |
A2 | 2.3±0.2c | 28.3±0.2b | 0.53±0.05cde | 0.047±0.001b | 0.67±0.04cd | 0.099±0.004d | 0.48±0.01ab | |
A3 | 2.7±0.1ab | 27.8±1.7bc | 0.58±0.09bcd | 0.049±0.008b | 0.69±0.02c | 0.104±0.008cd | 0.47±0.05ab | |
A4 | 2.9±0.2a | 26.0±0.6d | 0.62±0.02abc | 0.056±0.005ab | 0.92±0.08b | 0.120±0.006bc | 0.46±0.03ab | |
A5 | 3.0±0.1a | 25.4±1.2d | 0.71±0.09a | 0.061±0.006a | 1.06±0.07a | 0.146±0.008a | 0.41±0.06b | |
A6 | 2.5±0.2bc | 26.6±0.6cd | 0.64±0.12ab | 0.055±0.010ab | 0.84±0.10b | 0.123±0.013b | 0.45±0.05ab | |
A7 | 2.4±0.2bc | 27.9±0.8bc | 0.49±0.05de | 0.046±0.004b | 0.64±0.08cd | 0.097±0.008d | 0.47±0.07ab | |
CV(%) | 15.0 | 6.5 | 15.4 | 17.3 | 23.2 | 22.8 | 5.9 | |
香港软尾 生菜 Hong kong soft tailed lettuce | A1 | 2.3±0.1e | 21.6±1.2a | 0.52±0.06c | 0.041±0.004b | 0.56±0.02c | 0.055±0.010c | 0.75±0.05a |
A2 | 3.1±0.1c | 20.0±1.5abc | 0.66±0.07abc | 0.047±0.003ab | 0.86±0.04b | 0.081±0.020b | 0.58±0.03b | |
A3 | 3.1±0.1bc | 19.5±2.3abc | 0.68±0.06ab | 0.049±0.007ab | 0.90±0.17b | 0.090±0.017b | 0.55±0.06b | |
A4 | 3.3±0.2ab | 18.5±1.1bc | 0.70±0.10ab | 0.051±0.005ab | 0.96±0.08b | 0.096±0.006ab | 0.53±0.03b | |
A5 | 3.4±0.1a | 17.7±0.9c | 0.74±0.10a | 0.056±0.008a | 1.26±0.17a | 0.118±0.010a | 0.48±0.07b | |
A6 | 2.7±0.1d | 18.1±1.1c | 0.62±0.07abc | 0.047±0.007ab | 0.84±0.05b | 0.092±0.018b | 0.51±0.09b | |
A7 | 2.4±0.2e | 20.9±1.3ab | 0.57±0.10bc | 0.044±0.007b | 0.81±0.09b | 0.080±0.009b | 0.55±0.03b | |
CV(%) | 15.1 | 7.6 | 12.0 | 10.2 | 23.8 | 21.8 | 15.4 | |
F值 F value | 品种 (V) | 56.8** | 170.2** | 23.0** | 32.4** | 20.6** | 37.3** | 16.2** |
处理(T) | 95.5** | 24.9** | 18.7** | 12.5** | 59.5** | 52.1** | 14.4** | |
V×T | 4.7** | 1.8* | 0.6 | 0.8 | 2.1* | 1.8* | 1.0 |
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 总叶面积 Total leaf area (cm2) | 总叶长 Total leaf length (cm) | 总叶宽 Total leaf width (cm) | 最大功能叶叶长 Maximum function leaf length (cm) | 最大功能叶叶宽 Maximum function leaf width (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
奶油生菜 Butter lettuce | A1 | 16.9±0.7c | 14.9±0.4d | 10.8±0.7b | 3.02±0.01c | 2.15±0.18b |
A2 | 22.9±1.5b | 16.4±1.1cd | 12.1±0.3ab | 3.12±0.23c | 2.41±0.32ab | |
A3 | 24.9±2.2ab | 17.6±1.0bc | 12.7±0.5a | 3.49±0.25ab | 2.58±0.29a | |
A4 | 25.6±2.9ab | 18.6±0.8ab | 13.2±0.9a | 3.57±0.21a | 2.60±0.27a | |
A5 | 27.6±1.0a | 19.4±0.8a | 13.7±1.1a | 3.74±0.30a | 2.62±0.10a | |
A6 | 24.8±1.7ab | 18.6±0.9ab | 13.4±1.4a | 3.51±0.15a | 2.51±0.10ab | |
A7 | 23.3±1.4b | 18.1±0.9abc | 12.8±0.5a | 3.15±0.11bc | 2.49±0.18ab | |
CV(%) | 14.3 | 8.7 | 7.7 | 8.1 | 6.6 | |
耐抽薹 生菜 Bolting to lerance lettuce | A1 | 13.6±1.1d | 13.6±0.1d | 10.0±0.6e | 2.69±0.09e | 2.15±0.21d |
A2 | 17.1±1.4c | 16.9±1.9b | 12.0±0.9d | 3.02±0.15c | 2.43±0.11bc | |
A3 | 24.7±1.8a | 18.8±0.3a | 13.4±0.3bc | 3.22±0.09b | 2.59±0.14ab | |
A4 | 25.3±1.3a | 19.3±0.3a | 13.9±0.9ab | 3.50±0.09a | 2.69±0.11a | |
A5 | 26.9±1.9a | 20.1±1.7a | 14.8±1.0a | 3.61±0.11a | 2.72±0.11a | |
A6 | 21.8±0.8b | 15.7±0.4bc | 12.8±0.2bcd | 2.95±0.07cd | 2.55±0.08abc | |
A7 | 19.8±1.4b | 14.4±0.6cd | 12.3±0.8cd | 2.81±0.18de | 2.31±0.08cd | |
CV(%) | 22.4 | 14.9 | 12.1 | 11.2 | 8.3 | |
玻璃生菜 Lceberg lettuce | A1 | 16.4±2.2e | 13.2±1.6c | 10.2±1.3c | 3.33±0.31c | 2.51±0.14d |
A2 | 27.3±2cd | 17.6±1.7b | 13.5±0.6b | 3.94±0.20b | 3.08±0.22c | |
A3 | 29.8±1.1bc | 18.4±1.3b | 13.8±0.5b | 4.59±0.13a | 3.42±0.13ab | |
A4 | 36.3±1.5a | 22.2±1.4a | 16.5±0.5a | 4.71±0.11a | 3.49±0.12a | |
A5 | 39.6±0.8a | 23.6±1.0a | 16.9±0.4a | 4.90±0.16a | 3.52±0.08a | |
A6 | 32.2±3.6b | 19.4±1.0b | 14.4±1.2b | 3.94±0.31b | 3.23±0.3abc | |
A7 | 25.9±1.6d | 18.1±0.4b | 13.7±1.2b | 3.67±0.33bc | 3.12±0.09bc | |
CV(%) | 25.6 | 17.9 | 15.7 | 14.1 | 11.0 | |
罗马直立 生菜 Roman upright lettuce | A1 | 12.1±1.4e | 14.4±0.6e | 9.3±1.0c | 2.78±0.23d | 2.09±0.02d |
A2 | 20.7±1.8d | 16.6±1.0d | 12.5±0.5b | 3.27±0.13bc | 2.39±0.15bc | |
A3 | 21.6±1.4cd | 17.4±0.7cd | 12.9±1.0ab | 3.38±0.15bc | 2.45±0.04bc | |
A4 | 24.4±2.6bc | 19.0±0.8b | 13.4±0.4ab | 3.50±0.16b | 2.59±0.19ab | |
A5 | 28.4±2.1a | 20.6±0.6a | 14.1±0.2a | 3.83±0.14a | 2.72±0.10a | |
A6 | 25.9±1.0ab | 20.1±0.8ab | 13.5±0.7ab | 3.40±0.19bc | 2.34±0.1bcd | |
A7 | 20.7±2.2d | 18.8±1.4bc | 12.5±1.2b | 3.10±0.11c | 2.24±0.13cd | |
CV(%) | 23.7 | 11.9 | 12.3 | 9.9 | 8.8 | |
香港软尾 生菜 Hong kong soft tailed lettuce | A1 | 16.1±1.5c | 15.0±1.3d | 10.7±1.3b | 3.00±0.26d | 2.34±0.14c |
A2 | 29.1±0.6b | 19.8±0.2abc | 14.9±0.4a | 4.01±0.30abc | 3.05±0.13ab | |
A3 | 31.5±3.0ab | 20.8±1.7ab | 15.4±1.1a | 4.24±0.27ab | 3.15±0.21ab | |
A4 | 32.4±4.6ab | 21.4±2.8ab | 15.8±0.6a | 4.36±0.34a | 3.19±0.40ab | |
A5 | 34.5±2.5a | 22.8±1.8a | 16.5±1.0a | 4.50±0.30a | 3.49±0.43a | |
A6 | 28.4±3.2b | 18.1±1.8bcd | 15.9±0.7a | 3.79±0.19bc | 2.90±0.28bc | |
A7 | 28.0±2.3b | 16.5±2.2cd | 15.4±0.6a | 3.69±0.28c | 2.88±0.18bc | |
CV(%) | 20.9 | 14.5 | 13.0 | 12.9 | 11.8 | |
F值 F value | 品种(V) | 73.6** | 11.8** | 33.8** | 98.3** | 67.4** |
处理(T) | 98.5** | 51.0** | 54.8** | 57.0** | 22.2** | |
V×T | 3.2** | 3.4** | 1.7* | 2.3** | 0.9 |
表2 多效唑显著抑制下喷施赤霉素叶用莴苣幼苗叶形变化
Tab.2 Effects of spraying gibberellin on seedling leaf type of leaf lettuce under significant inhibition of paclobutrazol
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 总叶面积 Total leaf area (cm2) | 总叶长 Total leaf length (cm) | 总叶宽 Total leaf width (cm) | 最大功能叶叶长 Maximum function leaf length (cm) | 最大功能叶叶宽 Maximum function leaf width (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
奶油生菜 Butter lettuce | A1 | 16.9±0.7c | 14.9±0.4d | 10.8±0.7b | 3.02±0.01c | 2.15±0.18b |
A2 | 22.9±1.5b | 16.4±1.1cd | 12.1±0.3ab | 3.12±0.23c | 2.41±0.32ab | |
A3 | 24.9±2.2ab | 17.6±1.0bc | 12.7±0.5a | 3.49±0.25ab | 2.58±0.29a | |
A4 | 25.6±2.9ab | 18.6±0.8ab | 13.2±0.9a | 3.57±0.21a | 2.60±0.27a | |
A5 | 27.6±1.0a | 19.4±0.8a | 13.7±1.1a | 3.74±0.30a | 2.62±0.10a | |
A6 | 24.8±1.7ab | 18.6±0.9ab | 13.4±1.4a | 3.51±0.15a | 2.51±0.10ab | |
A7 | 23.3±1.4b | 18.1±0.9abc | 12.8±0.5a | 3.15±0.11bc | 2.49±0.18ab | |
CV(%) | 14.3 | 8.7 | 7.7 | 8.1 | 6.6 | |
耐抽薹 生菜 Bolting to lerance lettuce | A1 | 13.6±1.1d | 13.6±0.1d | 10.0±0.6e | 2.69±0.09e | 2.15±0.21d |
A2 | 17.1±1.4c | 16.9±1.9b | 12.0±0.9d | 3.02±0.15c | 2.43±0.11bc | |
A3 | 24.7±1.8a | 18.8±0.3a | 13.4±0.3bc | 3.22±0.09b | 2.59±0.14ab | |
A4 | 25.3±1.3a | 19.3±0.3a | 13.9±0.9ab | 3.50±0.09a | 2.69±0.11a | |
A5 | 26.9±1.9a | 20.1±1.7a | 14.8±1.0a | 3.61±0.11a | 2.72±0.11a | |
A6 | 21.8±0.8b | 15.7±0.4bc | 12.8±0.2bcd | 2.95±0.07cd | 2.55±0.08abc | |
A7 | 19.8±1.4b | 14.4±0.6cd | 12.3±0.8cd | 2.81±0.18de | 2.31±0.08cd | |
CV(%) | 22.4 | 14.9 | 12.1 | 11.2 | 8.3 | |
玻璃生菜 Lceberg lettuce | A1 | 16.4±2.2e | 13.2±1.6c | 10.2±1.3c | 3.33±0.31c | 2.51±0.14d |
A2 | 27.3±2cd | 17.6±1.7b | 13.5±0.6b | 3.94±0.20b | 3.08±0.22c | |
A3 | 29.8±1.1bc | 18.4±1.3b | 13.8±0.5b | 4.59±0.13a | 3.42±0.13ab | |
A4 | 36.3±1.5a | 22.2±1.4a | 16.5±0.5a | 4.71±0.11a | 3.49±0.12a | |
A5 | 39.6±0.8a | 23.6±1.0a | 16.9±0.4a | 4.90±0.16a | 3.52±0.08a | |
A6 | 32.2±3.6b | 19.4±1.0b | 14.4±1.2b | 3.94±0.31b | 3.23±0.3abc | |
A7 | 25.9±1.6d | 18.1±0.4b | 13.7±1.2b | 3.67±0.33bc | 3.12±0.09bc | |
CV(%) | 25.6 | 17.9 | 15.7 | 14.1 | 11.0 | |
罗马直立 生菜 Roman upright lettuce | A1 | 12.1±1.4e | 14.4±0.6e | 9.3±1.0c | 2.78±0.23d | 2.09±0.02d |
A2 | 20.7±1.8d | 16.6±1.0d | 12.5±0.5b | 3.27±0.13bc | 2.39±0.15bc | |
A3 | 21.6±1.4cd | 17.4±0.7cd | 12.9±1.0ab | 3.38±0.15bc | 2.45±0.04bc | |
A4 | 24.4±2.6bc | 19.0±0.8b | 13.4±0.4ab | 3.50±0.16b | 2.59±0.19ab | |
A5 | 28.4±2.1a | 20.6±0.6a | 14.1±0.2a | 3.83±0.14a | 2.72±0.10a | |
A6 | 25.9±1.0ab | 20.1±0.8ab | 13.5±0.7ab | 3.40±0.19bc | 2.34±0.1bcd | |
A7 | 20.7±2.2d | 18.8±1.4bc | 12.5±1.2b | 3.10±0.11c | 2.24±0.13cd | |
CV(%) | 23.7 | 11.9 | 12.3 | 9.9 | 8.8 | |
香港软尾 生菜 Hong kong soft tailed lettuce | A1 | 16.1±1.5c | 15.0±1.3d | 10.7±1.3b | 3.00±0.26d | 2.34±0.14c |
A2 | 29.1±0.6b | 19.8±0.2abc | 14.9±0.4a | 4.01±0.30abc | 3.05±0.13ab | |
A3 | 31.5±3.0ab | 20.8±1.7ab | 15.4±1.1a | 4.24±0.27ab | 3.15±0.21ab | |
A4 | 32.4±4.6ab | 21.4±2.8ab | 15.8±0.6a | 4.36±0.34a | 3.19±0.40ab | |
A5 | 34.5±2.5a | 22.8±1.8a | 16.5±1.0a | 4.50±0.30a | 3.49±0.43a | |
A6 | 28.4±3.2b | 18.1±1.8bcd | 15.9±0.7a | 3.79±0.19bc | 2.90±0.28bc | |
A7 | 28.0±2.3b | 16.5±2.2cd | 15.4±0.6a | 3.69±0.28c | 2.88±0.18bc | |
CV(%) | 20.9 | 14.5 | 13.0 | 12.9 | 11.8 | |
F值 F value | 品种(V) | 73.6** | 11.8** | 33.8** | 98.3** | 67.4** |
处理(T) | 98.5** | 51.0** | 54.8** | 57.0** | 22.2** | |
V×T | 3.2** | 3.4** | 1.7* | 2.3** | 0.9 |
图1 多效唑显著抑制下喷施赤霉素叶用莴苣幼苗地上部可溶性固形物含量变化 注:不同小写字母的值在同一品种下不同赤霉素质量浓度间差异达5%显著水平;**表示在0.01水平上差异显著,ns 表示差异不显著
Fig.1 Effects of spraying gibberellin on the ground leaf soluble solids content of the seedlings of leaf lettuce under significant inhibition of paclobutrazol Note: different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significantly different concentrations of gibberellin sprayed of the same variety at 5%.** indicates significant difference at the 0.01 level, ns: No significance
[1] |
Chen Y, Huang B, Hu W Y, et al. Assessing the risks of trace elements in environmental materials under selected greenhouse vegetable production systems of China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2014, 470/471: 1140-1150.
DOI URL |
[2] | 贾丽, 乔玉辉, 陈清, 等. 我国设施菜田土壤重金属含量特征与影响因素[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(2): 263-274. |
JIA Li, QIAO Yuhui, CHEN Qing, et al. Characteristics and affecting factors of heavy metals content in greenhouse vegetable soils in China[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2020, 39(2): 263-274. | |
[3] | 马倩, 董连新, 张小燕, 等. 3种植物生长延缓剂对温室甜瓜生长发育的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2020, 33(5): 39-44. |
MA Qian, DONG Lianxin, ZHANG Xiaoyan, et al. Effects of three kind of plant growth retardants on growth and development of muskmelon in greenhouse[J]. China Cucurbits and Vegetables, 2020, 33(5): 39-44. | |
[4] | Anwar S, Kuai J, Khan S, et al. Soaking seeds with paclobutrazol enhances winter survival and yield of rapeseed in a rice-rapeseed relay cropping system[J]. International Journal of Plant Production, 2017, 11(4): 1735-6814. |
[5] |
Kamran M, Su W N, Ahmad I, et al. Application of paclobutrazol affect maize grain yield by regulating root morphological and physiological characteristics under a semi-arid region[J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8: 4818.
DOI PMID |
[6] | Kumar S, Tomar B S, Arora A, et al. Influence of plant growth retardants on growth, seed yield and quality in onion (Allium cepa) cv.PusaRiddhi[J]. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 86(11): 1413-1417. |
[7] | 赵锋, 李光耀, 黄璐璐, 等. 多效唑在花生和土壤中的残留分析及消解动态[J]. 南方农业学报, 2017, 48(8): 1421-1426. |
ZHAO Feng, LI Guangyao, HUANG Lulu, et al. Residues and degradation dynamics of paclobutrazol in peanut and soil[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2017, 48(8): 1421-1426. | |
[8] | Rademacher W. Chemical regulators of gibberellins status and their application in plant production[M]. Annual Plant Reviews, Volume 49. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2016: 359-404. |
[9] |
Greenboim-Wainberg Y, Maymon I, Borochov R, Et al. Cross talk between gibberellin and cytokinin: The Arabidopsis GA response inhibitor SPINDLY plays a positive role in cytokinin signaling[J]. The Plant Cell, 2005, 17(1): 92-102.
DOI URL |
[10] |
Zhang G, Johkan M, Hohjo M, et al. Plant growth and photosynthesis response to low potassium conditions in three lettuce (Lactuca sativa) types[J]. The Horticulture Journal, 2017, 86(2): 229-237.
DOI URL |
[11] |
Chadwick M, Gawthrop F, Michelmore R W, et al. Perception of bitterness, sweetness and liking of different genotypes of lettuce[J]. Food Chemistry, 2016, 197: 66-74.
DOI PMID |
[12] | 郑春风, 刘春增, 任伟, 等. 不同时期叶面喷施多效唑对紫云英结实性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(1): 172-178. |
ZHENG Chunfeng, LIU Chunzeng, REN Wei, et al. Effects of spraying stages of paclobutrazol on seed setting characteristics of Chinese milk vetch(Astragalus sinicus L.)[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27(1): 172-178. | |
[13] | 张佳蕾, 郭峰, 李新国, 等. 不同时期喷施多效唑对花生生理特性、产量和品质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(3): 874-882. |
ZHANG Jialei, GUO Feng, LI Xinguo, et al. Effects of spraying paclobutrazol at different stages on physiological characteristics, yield and quality of peanut[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(3): 874-882. | |
[14] |
Kuai J, Yang Y, Sun Y Y, et al. Paclobutrazol increases canola seed yield by enhancing lodging and pod shatter resistance in Brassica napus L[J]. Field Crops Research, 2015, 180: 10-20.
DOI URL |
[15] | 黄诚梅, 班德宇, 魏源文, 等. 赤霉素与多效唑对甘蔗愈伤再生苗植株内源激素含量的影响[J]. 热带农业科学, 2019, 39(4): 41-47. |
HUANG Chengmei, BAN Deyu, WEI Yuanwen, et al. Effect of GA or PP333 on endogenous hormone content of sugarcane plants regenerated from calli[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 2019, 39(4): 41-47. | |
[16] | 吕梦雯, 徐金光, 杜杰, 等. 外源赤霉素和多效唑对芍药冬季鳞芽发育的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2018, 54(5): 790-802. |
LYU Mengwen, XU Jinguang, DU Jie, et al. Effects of exogenous gibberellins A3 and paclobutrazol on development of herbaceous peony(Paeonialactiflora) bulbils[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2018, 54(5): 790-802. | |
[17] |
龚明霞, 罗海玲, 袁红娟, 等. 外源赤霉素和多效唑对山药块茎膨大和零余子形成的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2015, 42(6): 1175-1184.
DOI |
GONG Mingxia, LUO Hailing, YUAN Hongjuan, et al. Effects of exogenous gibberellin and paclobutrazol on Tuber expansion and bulbil formation of Chinese yam[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2015, 42(6): 1175-1184.
DOI |
|
[18] | 耿玉娴. 不同浓度的赤霉素对打破多效唑药物残留的影响[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2005, 19(5): 300. |
GENG Yuxian. Effects of different concentrations of gibberellins on breaking the residue of paclobutrazole[J]. Chinese Potato, 2005, 19(5): 300. | |
[19] | 高术国, 苏翠军, 吴学仁, 等. GA3缓解多效唑对苹果树抑制作用试验研究(简报)[J]. 河北农业技术师范学院学报, 1997, 11(3): 69-71. |
GAO Shuguo, SU Cuijun, WU Xueren, et al. Alleviation of GA3 on inhibition of apple trees by PP333[J]. Journal of Hebei Agro Technical Teachers College, 1997, 11(3): 69-71. | |
[20] | 许文奇, 潘朗, 傅银祥. 用赤霉素缓解多效唑对桃树抑制作用的试验初报[J]. 北方果树, 1993,(2): 27. |
XU Wenqi, PAN Lang, FU Yinxiang. A preliminary study of gibberellin to alleviate the inhibition of paclobutrazol on peach trees[J]. Northern Fruits, 1993,(2): 27. | |
[21] | 班德宇, 陈小英, 黄诚梅. 赤霉素与多效唑对甘蔗愈伤再生苗生长的影响[J]. 中国糖料, 2015, 37(5): 24-27. |
BAN Deyu, CHEN Xiaoying, HUANG Chengmei. Effects of GA and PP333 on the growth of callus regenerated seedlings of sugarcane[J]. Sugar Crops of China, 2015, 37(5): 24-27. | |
[22] | 陈吴海, 刘元德. 苹果施用多效唑过量造成的抑制作用及喷施赤霉素后的缓解效应[J]. 烟台果树, 1995,(2): 33-34. |
CHEN Wuhai, LIU Yuande. Inhibitory effect of excessive application of paclobutrazol and relieving effect of gibberellin in apple[J]. Yantai Fruits, 1995,(2): 33-34. | |
[23] | 王志杰, 樊屹松, 蔡德义, 等. 赤霉素和多效唑对天女花移植苗生长的影响[J]. 河北林果研究, 2000, 15(4): 349-352. |
WANG Zhijie, FAN Yisong, CAI Deyi, et al. Effects OF gibberellin and PP 333 ON growth OF replanted seedlings of magncliasiebobdii[J]. Hebei Journal of Forestry and Orchard Research, 2000, 15(4): 349-352. | |
[24] | 李铭桐, 张增芹, 李敏, 等. 不同保鲜剂处理对鲜切生菜贮藏品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2016,(18): 139-142. |
LI Mingtong, ZHANG Zhengqin, LI Min, et al. Effect of different preservatives and storage temperature on the quality of fresh-cut lettuce[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2016,(18): 139-142. |
[1] | 冯彩军, 宋瑞娇, 宋凌宇, 张松, 齐军仓. 2,4-表芸苔素内酯浸种对干旱胁迫下大麦种子萌发及幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(2): 309-316. |
[2] | 胡文聪, 潘存德, 赵善超, 宋梦真, 童海麦, 田晨阳. 天山北坡中部天山云杉1 a生天然更新幼苗存活数量与功能性状的微生境分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(2): 454-463. |
[3] | 徐珊珊, 王环宇, 陆婷, 刘爱民. 下延叶古当归种子休眠特性与解除方法[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 3094-3101. |
[4] | 熊韬, 闫淼, 王豪杰, 毛建才, 王江涛, 胡国智. 盐碱胁迫对甜瓜种子萌发及幼苗生长发育的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(8): 1965-1974. |
[5] | 刘志刚, 任红松, 胡西旦·买买提, 王瑞华, 李海峰, 胡国智. 高温期喷施外源钙对甜瓜幼苗叶片生理特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(3): 588-596. |
[6] | 苏攀龙, 翟羽佳, 刘新元, 杨德松. 6种除草剂土壤封闭处理对板蓝根幼苗期生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(3): 725-734. |
[7] | 赵婧彤, 樊丁宇, 阿布都卡尤木·阿依麦提, 杨磊, 靳娟, 郝庆, 耿文娟. 花期喷施GA3对骏枣产量品质影响及枣果残留评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(1): 199-204. |
[8] | 李阳, 陈静, 刘绍东, 沈倩, 张思平, 葛常伟, 刘瑞华, 马慧娟, 万素梅, 庞朝友. 外源褪黑素对盐胁迫下棉花幼苗生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(8): 1418-1426. |
[9] | 孙艳芸, 朱普生, 刁明, 崔金霞, 徐巍, 刘慧英. 不同浓度GSNO对盐胁迫下番茄幼苗生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(4): 625-633. |
[10] | 刘春花, 张锐, 谢富, 王阳, 胡凯红, 王健健, 宋岩, 赵振坤, 张建良. 核桃实生幼苗光合特性对高磷胁迫的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(2): 254-264. |
[11] | 张梦婕, 吴湘琳, 魏亚媛, 耿庆龙, 哈丽哈什·依巴提, 李青军. 混合盐碱对棉花幼苗渗透调节物质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(11): 2011-2023. |
[12] | 公勤, 车勇, 王玲, 李兆华. 铜处理对菠菜幼苗体内氧化应激反应和矿质元素吸收的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(11): 2111-2121. |
[13] | 王海琪, 庞胜群, 杜红艳, 吉雪花, 马海翔, 张小燕. 加工番茄亲代与子代生长期内源激素含量与植株生长相关性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(1): 40-48. |
[14] | 贾凯, 闫会转, 高杰. 外源MeJA对芜菁幼苗生长及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(5): 806-813. |
[15] | 阿布都卡尤木·阿依麦提, 樊丁宇, 郝庆, 曾斌, 张翔飞, 余镇藩, 唐义莲. 赤霉素对枣花繁殖生物学特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(2): 283-291. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||