新疆农业科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (11): 2111-2121.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.11.018
收稿日期:
2020-07-02
出版日期:
2021-11-20
发布日期:
2021-12-16
通信作者:
公勤
作者简介:
公勤(1982-),女,河南宝丰人,副教授,博士,研究方向为逆境植物生理,(E-mail) 45542318@qq.com
基金资助:
GONG Qin1,2(), CHE Yong1, WANG Ling2, LI Zhaohua2,3
Received:
2020-07-02
Online:
2021-11-20
Published:
2021-12-16
Correspondence author:
GONG Qin
Supported by:
摘要:
【目的】研究不同浓度Cu处理对菠菜幼苗氧化应激反应、矿质营养吸收的影响,分析菠菜的耐Cu机理,为筛选强耐Cu性植物提供理论依据。【方法】以菠菜幼苗为材料,设置6组Cu处理浓度,处理7 d后,采样测试植物生物量、抗氧化物酶活性、大量元素和微量元素含量等指标的影响。【结果】低浓度Cu处理(50 mg/kg Cu浓度)时,菠菜幼苗体内Cu含量增加,但是并没有对植物的生长生理活动造成影响,主要表现为植物生物量显著增加,叶部K、Ca、Mg、Fe、Mn、Ni元素含量,以及根部N、P、K、Ca、Mg、Fe、Mn、Zn、Mo、Ni含量均达到最大值,其原因可能是植物能够主动提升自身抗氧化能力(SOD、APX活性和脯氨酸含量增加),将膜质过氧化伤害降至最低,避免Cu2+积累对植物产生的伤害。而高浓度Cu胁迫(1 000 mg/kg Cu浓度)时,菠菜幼苗体内的Cu含量增至最大值,SOD、CAT活性虽有增加但是也无法抵御高浓度Cu对膜质过氧化的严重伤害,幼苗叶部的N、P、K、Ca、Mg、Fe、Mn、Mo、Ni含量,以及根部P、K、Mg、Fe、Mn、Zn、Mo、Ni含量显著下降,生物量降至最低,高浓度Cu胁迫已超过了植物抵御胁迫伤害的能力,严重抑制了植物生长和矿质元素吸收。【结论】菠菜幼苗能够表现出较强的耐Cu性,将其作为Cu污染土壤修复的备选植物。
中图分类号:
公勤, 车勇, 王玲, 李兆华. 铜处理对菠菜幼苗体内氧化应激反应和矿质元素吸收的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(11): 2111-2121.
GONG Qin, CHE Yong, WANG Ling, LI Zhaohua. Effects of Copper Treatment on Oxidative Stress Response and Mineral Element Uptake in Spinach Seedlings[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(11): 2111-2121.
处理浓度 Treatment Concentration (mg/kg) | 根长 Total root length (cm) | 根表面积 Total root surface area (cm2) | 根系平均直径 Total root average diameter (mm) | 总根分叉数 Total root forks number | 总根尖数 Total root tips number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 96.72±1.79d | 14.04±0.48cd | 0.47±0.03bc | 1 160.67±3.09e | 336.33±8.26e |
50 | 129.03±2.52e | 14.76±1.04d | 0.54±0.05c | 1 267.67±1.25f | 365.67±4.03f |
100 | 82.78±2.54c | 12.86±1.19c | 0.47±0.07bc | 1 130.67±12.47d | 259.33±7.41d |
400 | 73.91±3.96c | 11.41±0.15b | 0.46±0.08bc | 1 043.00±9.09c | 206.00±1.41c |
700 | 64.70±2.21b | 11.21±0.07b | 0.36±0.03ab | 847.33±4.03b | 176.67±3.86b |
1000 | 54.98±1.12a | 9.54±0.37a | 0.35±0.02a | 654.67±2.49a | 106.00±0.82a |
表1 不同铜处理浓度下菠菜幼苗根系参数
Table 1 Effects of different Cu treatment concentrations on root parameters of spinach seedling
处理浓度 Treatment Concentration (mg/kg) | 根长 Total root length (cm) | 根表面积 Total root surface area (cm2) | 根系平均直径 Total root average diameter (mm) | 总根分叉数 Total root forks number | 总根尖数 Total root tips number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 96.72±1.79d | 14.04±0.48cd | 0.47±0.03bc | 1 160.67±3.09e | 336.33±8.26e |
50 | 129.03±2.52e | 14.76±1.04d | 0.54±0.05c | 1 267.67±1.25f | 365.67±4.03f |
100 | 82.78±2.54c | 12.86±1.19c | 0.47±0.07bc | 1 130.67±12.47d | 259.33±7.41d |
400 | 73.91±3.96c | 11.41±0.15b | 0.46±0.08bc | 1 043.00±9.09c | 206.00±1.41c |
700 | 64.70±2.21b | 11.21±0.07b | 0.36±0.03ab | 847.33±4.03b | 176.67±3.86b |
1000 | 54.98±1.12a | 9.54±0.37a | 0.35±0.02a | 654.67±2.49a | 106.00±0.82a |
图2 不同铜处理浓度下菠菜幼苗根系形态变化 Ⅰ: 0 mg/kg (CK); Ⅱ: 50 mg/kg; Ⅲ: 100 mg/kg; Ⅳ: 400 mg/kg; Ⅴ: 700 mg/kg; Ⅵ: 1 000 mg/kg
Fig.2 Effects of different Cu treatment concentrations on root morpho-logy of spinach seedling
图3 不同铜处理浓度下菠菜幼苗MDA(a)、脯氨酸(b)含量变化
Fig.3 Effects of different Cu treatment concentration on the contents of MDA (a) and Proline (b) in the spinach seedlings
图4 不同铜处理浓度下菠菜幼苗SOD(a)、POD(b)、CAT(c)、APX(d)含量变化
Fig.4 Effects of different Cu treatment concentration on the contents of SOD(a), POD(b), CAT(c) and APX(d) in the spinach seedlings
处理浓度 Treatment concentration (mg/kg) | 叶部 Leaves (mg/kg) | 根部 Roots (mg/kg) |
---|---|---|
0 | 19.72±0.14a | 7.97±0.06a |
50 | 194.30±3.82b | 14.60±0.04b |
100 | 295.08±9.32c | 30.10±0.04c |
400 | 1 908.17±16.60d | 120.97±0.06d |
700 | 3 005.83±21.21e | 194.15±1.06e |
1 000 | 3 611.00±21.52f | 230.85±2.35f |
表2 不同铜处理浓度下菠菜幼苗叶部、根部Cu含量变化
Table 2 Effects of different Cu treatment concentrations on the Cu contents in the leaves and roots of spinach seedling
处理浓度 Treatment concentration (mg/kg) | 叶部 Leaves (mg/kg) | 根部 Roots (mg/kg) |
---|---|---|
0 | 19.72±0.14a | 7.97±0.06a |
50 | 194.30±3.82b | 14.60±0.04b |
100 | 295.08±9.32c | 30.10±0.04c |
400 | 1 908.17±16.60d | 120.97±0.06d |
700 | 3 005.83±21.21e | 194.15±1.06e |
1 000 | 3 611.00±21.52f | 230.85±2.35f |
部位 Part | 处理浓度 Treatment concentration (mg/kg) | N (mg/g) | P (μg/g) | K (μg/g) | Ca (μg/g) | Mg (μg/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶部 Leaves | 0 | 83.43±0.62b | 901.63±1.74b | 38.11±0.29c | 1 488.92±10.36d | 13.09±0.13d |
50 | 83.47±0.62b | 863.63±6.76a | 46.76±0.23e | 1 777.50±15.84f | 14.16±0.02f | |
100 | 97.03±1.89e | 867.33±5.69a | 41.65±1.93d | 1 709.17±5.62e | 13.48±0.08e | |
400 | 90.77±1.07d | 926.08±8.20c | 37.66±1.29c | 1 445.42±4.60c | 12.35±0.04c | |
700 | 86.73±0.39c | 921.63±3.29c | 33.91±0.85b | 1 351.46±6.85b | 6.12±0.02b | |
1 000 | 77.47±0.79a | 859.83±11.71a | 30.75±0.16a | 1 208.43±1.47a | 4.57±0.04a | |
根部 Roots | 0 | 37.93±0.25a | 727.31±1.58e | 16.76±0.15c | 357.11±4.60a | 753.71±3.49e |
50 | 56.87±0.57f | 741.20±1.41f | 18.35±0.19d | 1 207.33±3.52f | 802.19±2.23f | |
100 | 53.83±0.63e | 661.33±1.22d | 17.99±0.59cd | 1 076.00±7.15e | 682.13±1.10d | |
400 | 51.70±0.37d | 584.19±1.80c | 17.21±1.25cd | 940.67±5.31d | 635.88±1.85c | |
700 | 48.73±0.83c | 420.88±3.45b | 14.84±0.39b | 900.33±3.63c | 529.41±1.43b | |
1 000 | 40.43±0.63b | 372.41±2.93a | 11.16±0.26a | 751.33±4.73b | 498.52±5.95a |
表3 不同铜处理浓度下菠菜幼苗叶部、根部大量元素吸收变化
Table 3 Effects of different Cu treatment concentrations on the absorption of macroelements in the leaves and roots of spinach seedlings
部位 Part | 处理浓度 Treatment concentration (mg/kg) | N (mg/g) | P (μg/g) | K (μg/g) | Ca (μg/g) | Mg (μg/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶部 Leaves | 0 | 83.43±0.62b | 901.63±1.74b | 38.11±0.29c | 1 488.92±10.36d | 13.09±0.13d |
50 | 83.47±0.62b | 863.63±6.76a | 46.76±0.23e | 1 777.50±15.84f | 14.16±0.02f | |
100 | 97.03±1.89e | 867.33±5.69a | 41.65±1.93d | 1 709.17±5.62e | 13.48±0.08e | |
400 | 90.77±1.07d | 926.08±8.20c | 37.66±1.29c | 1 445.42±4.60c | 12.35±0.04c | |
700 | 86.73±0.39c | 921.63±3.29c | 33.91±0.85b | 1 351.46±6.85b | 6.12±0.02b | |
1 000 | 77.47±0.79a | 859.83±11.71a | 30.75±0.16a | 1 208.43±1.47a | 4.57±0.04a | |
根部 Roots | 0 | 37.93±0.25a | 727.31±1.58e | 16.76±0.15c | 357.11±4.60a | 753.71±3.49e |
50 | 56.87±0.57f | 741.20±1.41f | 18.35±0.19d | 1 207.33±3.52f | 802.19±2.23f | |
100 | 53.83±0.63e | 661.33±1.22d | 17.99±0.59cd | 1 076.00±7.15e | 682.13±1.10d | |
400 | 51.70±0.37d | 584.19±1.80c | 17.21±1.25cd | 940.67±5.31d | 635.88±1.85c | |
700 | 48.73±0.83c | 420.88±3.45b | 14.84±0.39b | 900.33±3.63c | 529.41±1.43b | |
1 000 | 40.43±0.63b | 372.41±2.93a | 11.16±0.26a | 751.33±4.73b | 498.52±5.95a |
部位 Part | 处理浓度 Treatment concentration (mg/kg) | Fe (μg/g) | Mn (μg/g) | Zn (μg/g) | B (μg/g) | Mo (μg/g) | Ni (μg/g) | Si (μg/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶部 Leaves | 0 | 121.80±0.89b | 357.33±0.96c | 33.6±0.11b | 34.70±0.46a | 0.45±0.01d | 0.60±0.04c | 118.17±3.98b |
50 | 143.30±1.01d | 457.90±1.02e | 34.69±0.71b | 42.20±0.15c | 0.32±0.02c | 0.65±0.04c | 59.78±0.06a | |
100 | 131.90±4.16c | 453.77±5.75e | 33.56±0.73b | 39.61±0.05b | 0.3±0.01c | 0.42±0.02b | 138.08±0.46c | |
400 | 118.05±3.53b | 434.12±6.54d | 31.82±0.67a | 43.20±0.33d | 0.27±0.02bc | 0.27±0.02a | 250.60±0.04e | |
700 | 117.63±0.27b | 312.50±4.67b | 41.38±0.16c | 43.43±0.35d | 0.22±0.06ab | 0.25±0.04a | 206.77±0.46d | |
1 000 | 99.33±1.16a | 252.08±5.22a | 44.15±0.19d | 45.90±0.33e | 0.20±0.01a | 0.23±0.08a | 748.17±4.55f | |
根部 Roots | 0 | 133.00±0.87e | 80.1±0.41d | 16.02±0.08ab | 6.23±0.16a | 0.67±0.02a | 11.72±0.22b | 250.13±1.75a |
50 | 154.29±0.77f | 93.63±0.53e | 18.72±0.10cd | 7.65±0.27b | 2.10±0.01f | 16.65±0.04e | 441.62±8.45d | |
100 | 130.92±0.16d | 62.50±0.76b | 15.84±0.04bc | 7.98±0.08c | 1.72±0.02e | 15.42±0.26d | 399.37±1.09c | |
400 | 123.16±0.41c | 64.58±1.31c | 13.72±0.51bc | 9.07±0.02d | 1.07±0.02d | 14.93±0.10d | 341.70±0.37b | |
700 | 89.56±0.65b | 65.92±0.16c | 8.16±0.05a | 9.48±0.08e | 0.57±0.02c | 13.48±0.85c | 1 279.83±14.96e | |
1 000 | 86.81±0.64a | 53.75±0.32a | 7.81±0.10a | 9.47±0.06e | 0.30±0.04b | 8.77±0.39a | 1 427.83±5.51f |
表4 不同铜处理浓度下菠菜幼苗叶部、根部微量元素吸收变化
Table 4 Effects of different Cu treatment concentrations on the absorption of trace elements in the leaves and roots of spinach seedling
部位 Part | 处理浓度 Treatment concentration (mg/kg) | Fe (μg/g) | Mn (μg/g) | Zn (μg/g) | B (μg/g) | Mo (μg/g) | Ni (μg/g) | Si (μg/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶部 Leaves | 0 | 121.80±0.89b | 357.33±0.96c | 33.6±0.11b | 34.70±0.46a | 0.45±0.01d | 0.60±0.04c | 118.17±3.98b |
50 | 143.30±1.01d | 457.90±1.02e | 34.69±0.71b | 42.20±0.15c | 0.32±0.02c | 0.65±0.04c | 59.78±0.06a | |
100 | 131.90±4.16c | 453.77±5.75e | 33.56±0.73b | 39.61±0.05b | 0.3±0.01c | 0.42±0.02b | 138.08±0.46c | |
400 | 118.05±3.53b | 434.12±6.54d | 31.82±0.67a | 43.20±0.33d | 0.27±0.02bc | 0.27±0.02a | 250.60±0.04e | |
700 | 117.63±0.27b | 312.50±4.67b | 41.38±0.16c | 43.43±0.35d | 0.22±0.06ab | 0.25±0.04a | 206.77±0.46d | |
1 000 | 99.33±1.16a | 252.08±5.22a | 44.15±0.19d | 45.90±0.33e | 0.20±0.01a | 0.23±0.08a | 748.17±4.55f | |
根部 Roots | 0 | 133.00±0.87e | 80.1±0.41d | 16.02±0.08ab | 6.23±0.16a | 0.67±0.02a | 11.72±0.22b | 250.13±1.75a |
50 | 154.29±0.77f | 93.63±0.53e | 18.72±0.10cd | 7.65±0.27b | 2.10±0.01f | 16.65±0.04e | 441.62±8.45d | |
100 | 130.92±0.16d | 62.50±0.76b | 15.84±0.04bc | 7.98±0.08c | 1.72±0.02e | 15.42±0.26d | 399.37±1.09c | |
400 | 123.16±0.41c | 64.58±1.31c | 13.72±0.51bc | 9.07±0.02d | 1.07±0.02d | 14.93±0.10d | 341.70±0.37b | |
700 | 89.56±0.65b | 65.92±0.16c | 8.16±0.05a | 9.48±0.08e | 0.57±0.02c | 13.48±0.85c | 1 279.83±14.96e | |
1 000 | 86.81±0.64a | 53.75±0.32a | 7.81±0.10a | 9.47±0.06e | 0.30±0.04b | 8.77±0.39a | 1 427.83±5.51f |
[1] | Zhang J H, Li Z, Sun H L, et al. Adversity stress-related responses at physiological attributes, transcriptional and enzymatic levels after exposure to Cu in Lycopersicum esculentm seedlings[J]. Scientia Hotticulturae, 2017, 222:213-220. |
[2] |
Burkhead J L, Reynolds K A G, Abdel-Ghany S E, et al. Copper Homeostasis[J]. New Phytol, 2009, 182:799-816.
DOI PMID |
[3] |
Florence V D, Daniel E, Badr A S, et al. Effects of copper on growth and on photosynjournal of mature and expanding leaves in cucumber plants[J]. Plant Science, 2002, 163:53-58.
DOI URL |
[4] |
Zhang X, Zha T, Guo X, et al. Spatial distribution of metal pollution of soils of Chinese provincial capital cities[J]. Total Environmental, 2018, 643:1502-1513.
DOI URL |
[5] | GB15618-2018. 土壤环境质量农用地土壤污染风险管控标准[S]. |
GB15618-2018. Soil Environmental Quality Risk Control Standard for Soil Contamination of Agricultural Land[S]. | |
[6] |
Yruela I. Copper in plants: acquisition, transport and interactions[J]. Functional Plant Biology, 2009, 36:409-430.
DOI URL |
[7] |
Beatri S P, Mercedes F P, Pilar Z. Copper microlocalisation, ultrastructural alterations and antioxidant responses in the nodules of white lupin and soybean plants grown under conditions of copper excess[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2012, 84:52-60.
DOI URL |
[8] |
Machado M D, Soares H M V M, Soares V E. Removal of chromium, copper, and nickel from an electroplating effluent using a flocculent brewer's yeast strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae[J]. Water Air and Soil Pollution, 2010, 212:199-204.
DOI URL |
[9] |
Claudia Y M L, Francisco E G, Gabriela F O, et al. Bioaccumulation and changes in the photosynthetic appartus ofProsopis julifloraexposed to copper[J]. Botanical Sciences, 2016, 94(2):323-330.
DOI URL |
[10] |
Alkorta I, Hernández-Allica J, BecerrilI J M, et al. Chelate-enhanced phytoremediation of soils polluted with heavy metals[J]. Reviews in Environmental Science Biotechnology, 2004, 3:55-70.
DOI URL |
[11] | González-Mendoza D, Zapata-Pérez O. Mecanismos de tolerancia a elementos potencialmente tóxicos en plantas[J]. Boletin de la Sociedad Botanica de Mexico, 2008, 82:53-61. |
[12] | 贾丽, 郭笃发, 王龙龙. 济南市菜地蔬菜富集重金属的特征研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(2):117-119. |
JIA Li, GUO Dufa, WANG Longlong. Characteristic of heavy metal accumulation in vegetables in Jinan vegetable fields[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 43(2):117-119. | |
[13] | 刘庆, 李文庆, 王欣英, 等. 菠菜和油菜对铜的吸收及化学结合形态研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2005, 27(1):150-153. |
LIU Qing, LI Wenqing, WANG Xinying, et al. The absorption of copper in Spinach and rape and its chemical bound forms[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2005, 27(1):150-153. | |
[14] | 刘文英, 周凤, 戎婷婷, 等. 重金属铜对菠菜生理指标的影响[J]. 农业与技术, 2016, 36(3):1-4. |
LIU Wenying, ZHOU Feng, RONG Tingting, et al. Effects of copper on physiological indexes of Spinach[J]. Agriculture and Technology, 2016, 36(3):1-4. | |
[15] | Naz S, Anjum M A, Akhtar S. Monitoring of growth, yield, biomass and heavy metals accumulation in spinach grown under different irrigation sources[J]. Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics, 2016, 18:689-697. |
[16] |
Gong Q, Wang L, Dai T W, et al. Effects of copper on the growth, antioxidant enzymes and photosynjournal of spinach seedlings[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2019, 171:771-780.
DOI PMID |
[17] | Graaff M D A, Six J, Huang S Z, et al. Variation in root architecture among switchgrass cultivars impacts root decomposition rates[J]. Soil Bioloy & Biochemistry, 2013, 58:198-206. |
[18] |
Tewari R K, Kumar P, Sharma P N, et al. Modulation of oxidative stress responsive enzymes by excess cobalt[J]. Plant Science, 2002, 162:381-388.
DOI URL |
[19] |
Beauchamp C, Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels[J]. Analytical Biochemistry, 1971, 44:276-287.
PMID |
[20] |
Zheng X, Huystee R B V.. Peroxidase-regulated elongation of segments from peanut hypocotyls[J]. Plant Science, 1992, 81:47-56.
DOI URL |
[21] |
Lu Q, Zhang T, Zhang W, et al. Alleviation of cadmium toxicity in Lemna minor by exogenous salicylic acid[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2018, 147:500-508.
DOI URL |
[22] | Nakano Y, Asada K. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts[J]. Plant and Cell Physiology, 1981, 22:867-880. |
[23] | Lu R K. Analysis Methods for Soil and Agricultural Chemistry[D]. Naijing: Hohai University Press, 2000: 146-147. |
[24] | Li H S. The experiment principle and technique on plant physiology and biochemistry[D]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000: 121-123. |
[25] |
Israr M, Jewell A, Kumar D, et al. Ineractive effects of lead, copper, nickel and zine on growth, metal uptake and antioxidative metabolism of Sesbania drummondii[J]. Journal of Hazardous Material, 2011, 186:1520-1526.
DOI URL |
[26] |
Liu J J, Wei Z, Li J H. Effects of copper on leaf membrane structure and root activity of maize seedling[J]. Botanical Studies, 2014, 55:47-49.
DOI URL |
[27] |
Zheng H, Zhang Z, Xing X, et al. Potentially Toxic Metals in Soil and Dominant Plants from Tonglushan Cu-Fe Deposit, Central China[J]. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2019, 102:92-97.
DOI URL |
[28] | Chen J, Shafi M, Li S, et al. Copper induced oxidative stresses, antioxidant responses and phytoremediation potential of Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens)[J]. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5:135-138. |
[29] | Sajid A, Muhammad S, Ahmad N S, et al. Impact of copper toxicity on stone-head cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) in hydroponics[J]. Peer Journal, 2015: 1119-1122. |
[30] |
Florence VD, Daniel E, Badr AS, et al. Effects of copper on growth and on photosynjournal of mature and expanding leaves in cucumber plants[J]. Plant Science, 2002, 163:53-58.
DOI URL |
[31] |
Chen F, Wang F, Wu F B, et al. Modulation of exogenous glutathione in antioxidant defense system against Cd stress in the two barley genotypes differing in Cd tolerance[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2010, 48:663-672.
DOI PMID |
[32] | Rombel-Bryzek A, Rajfur M, Zhuk O. The impact of copper ions on oxidative stress in garden cress Lepidium sativum[J]. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S-Chemia I Inzynieria Ekologiczna, 2017, 24:78-82. |
[33] |
Vijendra P D, Huchappa K M, Lingappa R, et al. Physiological and biochemical changes in moth bean (Vigna aconitifoliaL.) under cadmium stress[J]. American Journal of Botany, 2016, 3(30):1-13.
DOI URL |
[34] |
Dai H, Xu Y, Zhao L, et al. Alleviation of copper toxicity on chloroplast antioxidant capacity and photosystem II photochemistry of wheat by hydrogen sulfide[J]. Brazilian Journal of Botany, 2016, 39:787-793.
DOI URL |
[35] |
Diao M, Ma L, Wang J, et al. Selenium Promotes the Growth and Photosynjournal of Tomato Seedlings Under Salt Stress by Enhancing Chloroplast Antioxidant Defense System[J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2014, 33:671-682.
DOI URL |
[36] | Sgherri C, Quartacci M F, Navariizzo F. Early production of activated oxygen species in root apoplast of wheat following copper excess[J]. Plant Physiology, 2007, 164:1152-1160. |
[37] |
Zhang H, Yan X, Wang G, et al. Excess copper induces accumulation of hydrogen peroxide and increases lipid peroxidation and total activity of copper-zinc superoxide dismutase in roots ofElsholtzia haichowensis[J]. Planta, 2008, 227:465-475.
DOI URL |
[38] | 翁南燕, 周东美, 武敬, 等. 铜镉复合胁迫下温度对小麦幼苗生长及其对铜、镉和矿质营养元素吸收与各元素在亚细胞分布的影响[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2011, 6(6):607-616. |
WENG Nanyan, ZHOU Dongmei, WU Jing, et al. Uptake, subcellular distributions of Cu, Cd and mineral elements, and plant growth for wheat seedlings under stress of Cu and Cd as affected by temperature[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2011, 6(6):607-616. | |
[39] | 夏国华, 黄坚钦, 解红恩, 等. 山核桃不同器官矿质元素含量的动态变化[J]. 果树学报, 2014, 31(5):854-862. |
XIA Guohua, HUANG Jianqin, XIE Hongen, et al. Dynamic changes of mineral elements in different organs of hickory (Carya cathayensis)[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2014, 31(5):854-862. | |
[40] | 公勤, 王玲, 戴同威, 等. 铜处理对菠菜幼苗矿质营养吸收和细胞超微结构的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(3):941-950. |
GONG Qin, WANG Ling, DAI Tongwei, et al. Effects of copper treatment on mineral nutrient absorption and cell ultrastructure of spinach seedlings[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(3):941-950. | |
[41] | Azooz M M, Abouelhand M F, Alfredan M A. Biphasic effect of copper on growth, proline, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzyme activies of wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Hasaawi) at early growing stage[J]. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 2012, 6:334-339. |
[42] |
Lequeux H, Hermans C, Lutls S, et al. Response to copper excess in Arabidopsis thaliana: Impact on the root system archiecture, hormone distribution, lignin accumulation and mineral profile[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2010, 48:673-682.
DOI PMID |
[43] |
Thounaojam T C, Panda P, Mazumdar P, et al. Excess copper induced oxidative stress and response of antioxidants in rice[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2012, 53:33-39.
DOI PMID |
[44] | 张然然, 张鹏, 都邵婷. 镉毒害下植物氧化胁迫及其信号调节机制的研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(3):981-992. |
ZHANG Ranran, ZHANG Peng, DU Shaoting. Oxidative stress-related signals and their regulation under Cd stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(3):981-992. | |
[45] | 陈京都, 何理, 许轲, 等. 镉胁迫对不同基因型水稻生长及矿质营养元素吸收的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(12):3219-3225. |
CHEN Jingdu, HE Li, XU Ke, et al. Growth and nutritional element absorption of different rice genotypes under cadmium stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2013, 32(12):3219-3225. | |
[46] |
Zhang G P, Fukami M, Sekimoto H. Influence of cadmium on mineral concentrations and yield components in wheat genotypes differing in Cd tolerance at seedling stage[J]. Field Crops research, 2002, 77:93-98.
DOI URL |
[47] |
RishiKesh U, Sanjib K P. Zinc reduces copper toxicity induced oxidative stress by promoting antioxidant defense in freshly grown aquatic duckweedSpirodela polyrhizaL.[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 175:1081-1084.
DOI PMID |
[48] | 王欣欣. 硅缓解欧美杨无性系Ⅰ-214镉胁迫的生理及转录调控机理[D]. 沈阳:沈阳农业大学. 2017. |
WANG Xinxin. Physiological and transcriptional regulatory mechanisms of silicon in alleviating cadmium stress in Populus euramericana clone I-214[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2017. |
[1] | 阿迪力·阿卜来提, 贾凯, 张妮, 罗燕梅, 许豪, 马丽娜, 高杰. 不同播种期对露地越冬菠菜生长发育及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(9): 1697-1703. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||