膜下滴灌水稻生理生化特性对灌浆期控水的响应

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.09.002

新疆农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (9): 2091-2103.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.09.002

• 耕作栽培·生理生化·作物遗传育种·种质资源 • 上一篇下一篇

膜下滴灌水稻生理生化特性对灌浆期控水的响应

蒲胜海¹^,²^,³(), 王则玉¹^,², 丁峰¹^,², 王彩风⁴, 刘小利¹^,², 马晓鹏¹^,²(), 王涛⁵, 彭银双⁶, 李韵同¹

1.新疆农业科学院土壤肥料与农业节水研究所，乌鲁木齐 830091
2.农业农村部西北绿洲农业环境重点实验室，乌鲁木齐 830091
3.新疆慧尔农业集团股份有限公司，新疆昌吉 831100
4.奇台县农业技术推广中心，新疆奇台 831800
5.石河子大学水利建筑工程学院，新疆石河子 832000
6.乌鲁木齐京诚检测技术有限公司，乌鲁木齐 830000

收稿日期:2021-12-01 出版日期:2022-09-20 发布日期:2023-01-16
通信作者: 马晓鹏
作者简介:蒲胜海（1982-），男，重庆垫江人，副研究员，研究方向为水肥资源高效利用，（E-mail）aiqing2008@126.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2021YFD1900805);国家自然科学基金(51569033);农业科技创新稳定支持项目(xjnkywdzc-2022005)

Hysiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Rice under Mulch Drip Irrigation with Different Water Controlin the Filling Stage

PU Shenghai¹^,²^,³(), WANG Zeyu¹^,², DING Feng¹^,², WANG Caifeng⁴, LIU Xiaoli¹^,², MA Xiaopeng¹^,²(), WANG Tao⁵, PENG Yinshuang⁶, LI Yuntong¹

1. Research Institute of Soil， Fertilizer and Agricultural Water Conservation， Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences， Urumqi 830091， China
2. Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture in Northwest Oasis Agriculture Environment， Urumqi 830091， China
3. Xinjiang Huier Agricultural Group Co. LTD， Changji Xinjiang 831100， China
4. Center of Agricultural Techniques Extension of Qitai Area，Qitai Xinjiang 831800， China
5. School of Water Conservancy and Architectural Engineering， Shihezi University， Shihezi Xinjiang 832000， China
6. Urumqi Jingcheng Detection Technology Co.，Ltd.， Urumqi 830000， China

Received:2021-12-01 Online:2022-09-20 Published:2023-01-16
Correspondence author: MA Xiaopeng
Supported by:
National Key research and development program(2021YFD1900805);Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China(51569033);Project of Fund for Stable Support to Agricultural Sci-Tech Renovation(xjnkywdzc-2022005)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】 研究膜下滴灌水稻叶片生理生化特性和产量对灌浆期控水的响应，为干旱区水稻节水栽培提供理论依据。【方法】 以田间持水率（θs）为参考，水稻灌浆期设置90%θs（W₁）、80% θs（W₂）和70% θs（W₃）的3种不同灌水控制下限，以常规淹灌为对照（CK），研究不同水分条件对水稻的光合特性、保护酶活性、渗透调节物质、根系活力、产量和水分利用效率的影响。【结果】 灌浆期控水会导致水稻的光合作用减弱，与对照（CK）相比，叶片净光合速率（P_n）、蒸腾速率（T_r）、气孔导度（G_s）和胞间CO₂浓度（C_i）分别下降15.12%~72.38%、25.32%~67.59%、5.93%~24.34%和29.62%~62.61%。灌浆期控水可增强水稻抗氧化系统酶活性，W₃的SOD、CAT和POD均最高，比CK依次高出77.78%、24.64%和14.24%。在灌浆期，控水下限越低，可溶性糖含量、脯氨酸含量越高，可溶性蛋白越低；W₃的可溶性糖含量是其他处理的1.35~2.32倍，CK可溶性蛋白含量高出控水处理6.72%~25.24%。CK最高产量为8 222.12 kg/hm²，比W₁、W₂、W₃增产16.37%~59.96%。与CK相比，控水处理耗水量下降56.06%~61.66%，水分利用效率提高38.65%~48.79%。【结论】 膜下滴灌水稻灌浆期控水对水稻的生理生化特性及稻米品质影响负显著，不宜控水，灌浆期灌水上下限分别设为5和10 cm水层，可保证水稻优质高产。

关键词: 水分调控; 水稻灌浆期; 生理生化特性; 产量; 水分利用效率

Abstract:

【Objective】 The effect of water control on rice during grain-filling stage was studied in this paper，providing a theoretical support for water-saving rice cultivation in arid areas. 【Methods】 At rice filling stage，three lower limits of irrigation control were set：90% θs （field water-holding capacity），80%θs and 70% θs （marked as W₁，W₂ and W₃，respectively），and conventional flood irrigation was set as control （marked as CK）. The photosynthetic characteristics，protective enzyme activities，osmotic adjustment substances，root activity，yield and water use efficiency of rice under different water conditions were compared. 【Results】 Water controlwould weaken photosynthesis of rice in the filling stage. The results showed that the P_n（net photosynthetic rate），T_r（intercellular carbon dioxide concentration），G_s（stomatal conductance） and C_i（Intercellular carbon dioxide concentration） decreased by 15.12%-72.38%，25.32%-67.59%，5.93%-24.34% and 29.62%-62.61%，respectively. Water control can enhance the enzyme activity of rice antioxidant system in the filling stage. SOD，CAT and POD of W₃ were the highest，which were 77.78%，24.64% and 14.24% higher than those of CK. In the filling stage，the lower the water control limit，the higher the soluble sugar content and proline content，the lower the soluble protein content. The soluble sugar content of W₃ was 1.35-2.32 times of that of other treatments，and the soluble protein content of CK was 6.72%~25.24% higher than that of the three water control treatments. The highest yield of CK was 8 222.12 kg/hm²，which was 16.37%~59.96% higher than that of W₁，W₂ and W₃. Compared with CK，water consumption for W₁，W₂ and W₃ decreased by 56.06%~61.66%，and water use efficiency increased by 38.65%~48.79%. 【Conclusion】 Water control during grain filling period under mulch drip irrigation has a negative effect on physiological and biochemical characteristics and rice quality，and it is not suitable to control water. During the grain filling period，the upper and lower limits of water control were set to 5 cm and 10 cm，respectively，to ensure high quality and high yield of rice.

Key words: water control; rice grain filling; hysiological and biochemical characteristics; yiled; water use efficiency

中图分类号:

S511

蒲胜海, 王则玉, 丁峰, 王彩风, 刘小利, 马晓鹏, 王涛, 彭银双, 李韵同. 膜下滴灌水稻生理生化特性对灌浆期控水的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(9): 2091-2103.

PU Shenghai, WANG Zeyu, DING Feng, WANG Caifeng, LIU Xiaoli, MA Xiaopeng, WANG Tao, PENG Yinshuang, LI Yuntong. Hysiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Rice under Mulch Drip Irrigation with Different Water Controlin the Filling Stage[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2091-2103.

图/表 10

参考文献 40

[1]	冀俊超. 不同水分管理对旱直播水稻生长生理特性与温室气体排放的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2021.
	Ji Junchao. Effects of Different Water Management on Growth and Physiological Characteristics and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Dry Direct Seeding Rice[D]. Haerbing: Northeast Agricultural University, 2021.
[2]	丁峰, 蒲胜海, 吕玉平, 等. 不同灌溉定额对膜下滴灌水稻耗水特征及水分生产效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(9):1577-1584. DOI
	DING Feng, PU Shenghai, LV Yuping, et al. Effects of Different Irrigation Quotas on Water Consumption Characteristics and Water Production Efficiency of Rice under Film Drip Irrigation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(9):1577-1584. DOI
[3]	段孟越. 不同水分利用效率水稻品种筛选及其光合特性初步探究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2019.
	DUAN Mengyue. Screening of Rice Varieties with Different Water Use Efficiency and Their Photosynthetic Characteristics[D]. Haerbing: Northeast Agricultural University, 2019.
[4]	杨秀霞, 燕辉, 周春火, 等. 水分胁迫下氮形态对水稻根系孔隙度及水分吸收的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2019, 37(2):144-149.
	YANG Xiuxia, YAN Hui, ZHOU Chunhuo, et al. Effects of nitrogen forms on root porosity and waterabsorption of rice under drought stress[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2019, 37(2):144-149.
[5]	朱士江, 叶晓思, 王斌, 等. 不同水分调控、生物炭配比对水稻产量与水分利用效率的影响[J]. 节水灌溉, 2018,(1):1-5.
	ZHU Shijiang, YE Xiaosi, WANG Bin, et al. Effects of Water-Biochar Coupling on Rice Yield and Water Use Efficiency[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2018,(1):1-5.
[6]	Barnaby J Y, Rohila J S, Henry C G, et al. Physiological and Metabolic Responses of Rice to Reduced Soil Moisture:Relationship of Water Stress Tolerance and Grain Production[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2019, 20(8).
[7]	刘虎, 王健, 阿比亚斯, 等. 内蒙古东部膜下滴灌旱作水稻作物需水量与产量研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(29):146-151.
	Liu Hu, Wang Jian, Abiyasi, et al. Crop Water Requirement and Yield of Aerobic Rice Under Mulched Drip Irrigation in Eastern Inner Mongolia[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(29):146-151.
[8]	何海兵, 杨茹, 武立权, 等. 膜下滴灌水稻优化毛管配置模式及适宜灌溉强度的研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(1):75-84. DOI
	HE Haibing, YANG Ru, WU Liquan, et al. Optimal Capillary Configuration Modes and Irrigation Intensities for Drip Irrigation with Plastic Film Mulching in Rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2016, 30(1):75-84. DOI
[9]	Zhuang Y, Zhang L, Li S, et al. Effects and potential of water-saving irrigation for rice production in China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 217:374-382. DOI URL
[10]	蔡一霞, 李洋, 朱海涛, 等. 灌浆期亏缺灌溉对水稻产量形成的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(8):1492-1505.
	CAI Yixia, LI Yang, ZHU Haitao, et al. Effects of Deficit Irrigation on the Formation of the Yield in Rice(Oryza sativa) During Filling Period[J]. ScientiaAgriculturaSinica, 2015, 48(8):1492-1505.
[11]	杨晓龙, 程建平, 汪本福, 等. 灌浆期干旱胁迫对水稻生理性状和产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(1):38-46. DOI
	YANG Xiaolong, CHENG Jianping, WANG Benfu, et al. Effects of Drought Stress at Grain Filling Stage on Rice Physiological Characteristics and Yield[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2021, 35(1):38-46. DOI
[12]	Palanog A D, Swamy B P M, Shamsudin N A A, et al. Grain yield QTLs with consistent-effect under reproductive-stage drought stress in rice[J]. Field Crops Research, 2014, 161:46-54. DOI URL
[13]	Ndjiondjop M N, Futakuchi K, Cisse F, et al. Field evaluation of rice genotypes from the two cultivated species (Oryza sativa L. and OryzaglaberrimaSteud.) and their interspecifics for tolerance to drought[J]. Crop science, 2012, 52(2):524-538. DOI URL
[14]	Yang X, Wang B, Chen L, et al. The different influences of drought stress at the flowering stage on rice physiological traits,grain yield,and quality[J]. Scientific reports, 2019, 9(1):1-12. DOI URL
[15]	吕艳梅. 两个优质水稻品种孕穗至灌浆期高温干旱对品质和产量性状的影响[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2015.
	LV Yanmei. Effects of High Temperature and Drought during Booting to Filling Stage on the Grain Quality and Yield Characters for Two High Quality Rice Varieties[D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2015.
[16]	马文慧. 土壤水分下限控制灌溉对水稻生长性状及产量的影响[D]. 天津: 天津农学院, 2021.
	MA Wenhui. Effects of Lower Limit-controlled Irrigation of Soil Moisture on Growth Characteristics and Yield of Rice[D]. Tianjing: Tianjin Agricultural College, 2021.
[17]	王易天, 郭相平, Hamoud YousefAlhaj, 等. 智能氮肥在干湿交替灌溉下对水稻产量与水分利用率的影响[J]. 节水灌溉, 2021,(8):37-41.
	WANG Yitian, GUO Xiangping, Hamoud YousefAlhaj, et al. Effects of Smart Fertilizer Under Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation on Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Rice[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2021(8):37-41.
[18]	徐晨, 凌风楼, 徐克章, 等. 盐胁迫对不同水稻品种光合特性和生理生化特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(3):280-286.
	XU Chen, LING Fenglou, XU Kezhang, et al. Effect of Salt Stress on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Physiological and Biochemical Traits of Different Rice Varieties[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2013, 27(3):280-286.
[19]	李合生. 现代植物生理学(第3版)[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2012:131-138.
	LI Hesheng. Plant Physiology (3rd edition)[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2012:131-138.
[20]	钱晓晴, 沈其荣, 徐勇, 等. 不同水分管理方式下水稻的水分利用效率与产量[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003,(3):399-404. PMID
	QIAN Xiaoqing, SHEN Qirong, XU Yong, et al. Water use efficiency and rice yield under different water managements.[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2003(3):399-404. PMID
[21]	He H, Yang R, Jia B, et al. Rice photosynthetic productivity and PSII photochemistry under nonflooded irrigation[J]. The scientific world journal, 2014:1-14.
[22]	徐强, 马晓鹏, 吕廷波, 等. 分蘖期干旱胁迫对水稻光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2020, 38(1):133-139.
	XU Qiang, MA Xiaopeng, LV Tingbo, et al. Effects of drought stress at tillering stage on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of rice[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2020, 38(1):133-139.
[23]	Jones H G. Partitioning stomatal and non‐stomatal limitations to photosynthesis[J]. Plant,Cell & Environment, 1985, 8(2):95-104.
[24]	Xu Q, Ma X, Lv T, et al. Effects of water stress on fluorescence parameters and photosynthetic characteristics of drip irrigation in rice[J]. Water, 2020, 12(1):289. DOI URL
[25]	Chaves M M, Oliveira M M. Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits:prospects for water-saving agriculture[J]. Journal of experimental botany, 2004, 55(407):2365-2384. DOI PMID
[26]	蔡昆争, 吴学祝, 骆世明. 不同生育期水分胁迫对水稻根叶渗透调节物质变化的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008,(2):491-500. DOI
	CAI KunZheng, WU XueZhu,and LUO ShiMing. Effects of water stress on osmolytes at different growth stages in rice leaves and roots[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2008,(2):491-500.
[27]	Koca H, Bor M, Özdemir F, et al. The effect of salt stress on lipid peroxidation,antioxidative enzymes and proline content of sesame cultivars[J]. Environmental and experimental Botany, 2007, 60(3):344-351. DOI URL
[28]	Tripathi S B, Gurumurthi K, Panigrahi A K, et al. Salinity induced changes in proline and betaine contents and synthesis in two aquatic macrophytes differing in salt tolerance[J]. Biologiaplantarum, 2007, 51(1):110-115.
[29]	He H, Ma F, Yang R, et al. Rice performance and water use efficiency under plastic mulching with drip irrigation[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(12):e83103. DOI URL
[30]	王抄抄, 孔雷蕾, 李妹娟, 等. 分蘖期控水处理对超级稻产量和生理特性的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2015, 30(5):146-152. DOI
	WANG Chaochao, KONG Leilei, LI Meijuan, et al. Effect of Water Treatments at Tillering Stage on Super Rice Yield and Physiological Characteristics[J]. ActaAgriculturaeBoreali-Sinica, 2015, 30(5):146-152.
[31]	宋新颖, 邬爽, 张洪生, 等. 土壤水分胁迫对不同品种冬小麦生理特性的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2014, 29(2):174-180. DOI
	SONG Xinying, WU Shuang, ZHANG Hongsheng, et al. Effect of Soil Water Stress on Physiological Characteristics in Different Winter Wheat Cultivars[J]. ActaAgriculturaeBoreali-Sinica, 2014, 29(2):174-180.
[32]	Raza S H, Athar H R, Ashraf M, et al. Glycinebetaine-induced modulation of antioxidant enzymes activities and ion accumulation in two wheat cultivars differing in salt tolerance[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2007, 60(3):368-376. DOI URL
[33]	王贺正, 马均, 李旭毅, 等. 水分胁迫对水稻结实期活性氧产生和保护系统的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2007,(7):1379-1387.
	WANG Hezheng, MA Jun, LI Xuyi, et al. Effects of Water Stress on Active Oxygen Generation and Protection System in Rice During Grain Filling Stage[J]. ScientiaAgriculturaSinica, 2007,(7):1379-1387.
[34]	王贺正, 马均, 李旭毅, 等. 水分胁迫对水稻结实期一些生理性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2006,(12):1892-1897.
	WANG HeZheng, MA Jun, LI XuYi, et al. Effects of Water Stress on Some Physiological Characteristics in Rice during Grain Filling Stage[J]. ActaAgronomicaSinica, 2006,(12):1892-1897.
[35]	耿艳秋, 金峰, 朱明霞, 等. 灌浆乳熟期土壤水势对苏打盐渍土水稻产量及生理性状的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(5):534-540.
	GENG Yanqiu, JIN Feng, ZHU Mingxia, et al. Effects of Soil Water Potential at Grain Filling-Milky Stage on Rice Yield and Physiological Traits in Saline-alkali Soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2014, 28(5):534-540.
[36]	白如霄, 陈勇, 张新疆, 等. 土壤盐分对膜下滴灌水稻生长及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2016, 53(3):473-480.
	BAI Ruxiao, CHEN Yong, ZHANG Xinjiang, et al. Effects of Soil Salinity on Rice Growth and Yield under Drip Irrigation and Film Mulch[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 53(3):473-480.
[37]	陈金武. 内蒙古通辽市水稻膜下滴灌灌溉制度试验研究[J]. 节水灌溉, 2018,(4):11-14.
	CHEN Jinwu. Experimental Research on Irrigation Schedule of Drip Irrigation under Film for Rice of Tongliao City[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2018(4):11-14.
[38]	李冬, 杨江平, 王欢庆, 等. 新疆膜下滴灌旱作水稻不同生育期控制性灌溉对产量及农艺性状的影响[J]. 北方水稻, 2018, 48(6):11-12,15.
	LI Dong, YANG Jiangping, WANG Huanqing, et al. Effects of Control Irrigation on Yield and Agronomic Characteristics of Different Fertility Periods of Drip Irrigation for Rice in Xinjiang[J]. North Rice, 2018, 48(6):11-12,15.
[39]	吕艳东, 郭晓红, 李猛, 等. 膜下滴灌水肥耦合对寒地水稻产量构成因素及产量的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017, 37(5):46-52.
	LV Yandong, GUO Xiaohong, LI Meng, et al. Effect of Water and Fertilizer Coupling on Rice Yield and Its Components Under Drip Irrigation with Plastic Film Mulching in Cold Region[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 37(5):46-52.
[40]	何进宇, 田军仓. 膜下滴灌旱作水稻水肥耦合模型及组合方案优化[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(13):77-82.
	He Jinyu, Tian Juncang. Model of coupling water with fertilizer and optimum combination scheme of rice cultivated in aerobic soil with drip irrigation under plastic film[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(13):77-82.

处理 Treatment	灌溉标准 Irrigation limit	苗期 Seedling Stage	分蘖期 Tilling stage	拔节期 Jointing stage	灌浆期 Filling stage	成熟期 Maturity stage
W₁	灌水下限（θs）	0.90	0.75	0.90	0.90	0.70
W₁	灌水上限（θs）	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
W₂	灌水下限（θs）	0.90	0.75	0.90	0.80	0.70
W₂	灌水上限（θs）	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
W₃	灌水下限（θs）	0.90	0.75	0.9	0.70	0.70
W₃	灌水上限（θs）	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
CK	灌水下限（cm）	0	5	5	5	0
CK	灌水上限（cm）	5	10	10	10	5

处理 Treatment	灌溉标准 Irrigation limit	苗期 Seedling Stage	分蘖期 Tilling stage	拔节期 Jointing stage	灌浆期 Filling stage	成熟期 Maturity stage
W₁	灌水下限（θs）	0.90	0.75	0.90	0.90	0.70
W₁	灌水上限（θs）	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
W₂	灌水下限（θs）	0.90	0.75	0.90	0.80	0.70
W₂	灌水上限（θs）	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
W₃	灌水下限（θs）	0.90	0.75	0.9	0.70	0.70
W₃	灌水上限（θs）	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
CK	灌水下限（cm）	0	5	5	5	0
CK	灌水上限（cm）	5	10	10	10	5

参数 Parameter	P_n	G_s	C_i	T_r
P_n	1.00	0.62*	-0.71**	0.49*
G_s		1.00	-0.03	0.57**
C_i			1.00	0.08
T_r				1.00

参数 Parameter	P_n	G_s	C_i	T_r
P_n	1.00	0.62*	-0.71**	0.49*
G_s		1.00	-0.03	0.57**
C_i			1.00	0.08
T_r				1.00

年份 Years	处理 Treatment	有效穗数Effective panicle （穗/m²）	穗粒数 Grain Number per spike	千粒重 1000-grain weight（g）	结实率 Seed setting rate（%）	处理 Yield （kg/hm²）	ET （mm）	WUE （kg/（mm·hm²））
2018	W₁	484.69±32.46^bc	121.66±14.21^a	21.04±0.91^a	73.96±2.10^a	7 018.06±260.31^a	1 438.66±35.44^b	4.88±0.08^a
	W₂	543.87±45.61^b	109.04±10.42^a	19.22±0.60^b	67.83±2.50^b	6 053.73±275.69^b	1 338.44±34.84^b	4.52±0.13^b
	W₃	502.54±20.77^b	113.94±2.34^a	18.20±0.70^b	63.89±2.71^c	5 042.92±178.50^c	1 209.65±43.03^c	4.17±0.02^c
	CK	604.57±22.77^a	128.05±9.52^a	25.77±1.07^a	80.27±6.21^a	8 228.01±296.54^a	3 279.71±26.97^a	2.51±0.11^d
2019	W₁	490.77±8.40^b	125.34±5.82^ab	22.07±1.02^b	74.58±0.96^b	7 113.48±94.16^b	1 412.84±22.36^b	5.04±0.14^a
	W₂	508.29±31.87^b	114.68±8.42^b	19.14±0.42^c	68.95±1.41^c	6 195.35±181.73^c	1 384.77±45.61^b	4.47±0.049^b
	W₃	480.07±19.72^b	110.34±8.11^b	18.39±0.53^c	64.83±1.48^c	5 237.49±283.88^c	1 278.54±21.68^b	4.10±0.29^c
	CK	589.47±10.40^a	129.67±4.04^a	24.25±1.55^a	79.22±2.66^a	8 216.22±111.21^a	3 209.83±157.43^a	2.57±0.16^d

膜下滴灌水稻生理生化特性对灌浆期控水的响应

Hysiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Rice under Mulch Drip Irrigation with Different Water Controlin the Filling Stage

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 40

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

参数 Parameter	有效穗数 Effective panicle number	穗粒数 Grain number per spike	千粒重 1000-grain weight	结实率 Seed setting rate	产量 Yield	耗水量 ET
有效穗数 Effective panicle number	1	0.53	0.69*	0.68*	0.74**	0.91**
穗粒数 Grain number per spike		1	0.81**	0.72**	0.78**	0.63*
千粒重 1000-grain weight			1	0.88**	0.91**	0.80**
结实率 Seed setting rate				1	0.98**	0.77**
产量 Yield					1	0.82**
耗水量ET						1

[1]	陈茂光, 林涛, 张昊, 刘海军, 王一帆, 汤秋香. 地膜类型对棉花生长的影响及自身降解和回收特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108.
[2]	杨国江, 陈云, 林祥群, 何江勇, 刘盛林, 曲永清. 氮肥减施下有机肥替代对滴灌棉花产量、氮素吸收利用及土壤硝态氮的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145.
[3]	陈传信, 张永强, 聂石辉, 孔德鹏, 赛力汗·赛, 徐其江, 雷钧杰. 生物质炭施用量对滴灌冬小麦生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2146-2151.
[4]	王立红, 张宏芝, 张跃强, 李剑峰, 王重, 高新, 时佳, 王春生, 夏建强, 樊哲儒. 不同产量水平冬小麦产量差异形成的干物质生产、转运及氮肥利用分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2152-2162.
[5]	王晓雨, 王小平, 史文宇, 刘美艳, 马健, 郭云鹏, 宋瑞欣, 王清涛. 拔节期冬小麦光合特性、干物质积累和产量对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2163-2172.
[6]	向莉, 王仙, 董裕生, 郭小玲, 方伏荣, 陈智军, 马艳明, 苗雨. 外源丁酸对干旱胁迫下大麦产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2173-2181.
[7]	杨红梅, 张跃强, 史应武, 吾买尔江·库尔班, 林青, 王宁, 楚敏, 曾军. 不同类型叶面肥喷施对冬小麦籽粒产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2182-2188.
[8]	马明杰, 赵经华, 李冬民, 杨胜春, 王克贤, 李池. 不同灌溉方式对苜蓿土壤水分与灌溉水利用效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2306-2313.
[9]	王心, 林涛, 崔建平, 吴凤全, 唐志轩, 崔来园, 郭仁松, 王亮, 郑子漂. 种植模式与灌溉定额对机采长绒棉产量及纤维品质形成的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1821-1829.
[10]	董艳雪, 贾永红, 张金汕, 李丹丹, 王凯, 罗四维, 王润琪, 石书兵. 不同生态区环境下春小麦干物质积累及产量形成分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1848-1857.
[11]	李怀胜, 艾洪玉, 孟玲, 王贺亚, 张磊, 艾海峰. 减氮下运筹养分吸收高峰期追施比例对春小麦的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1866-1872.
[12]	张超, 白云岗, 郑明, 肖军, 丁平. 极端干旱区葡萄水肥协同效应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1931-1939.
[13]	王挺, 张力, 张凡凡, 黄嵘峥, 李肖, 张玉琳, 陈永成, 赵建涛, 马春晖. 适合青贮的玉米品种生产性能筛选及营养价值评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1596-1605.
[14]	梁志国, 王泽鹏, 贾宋楠, 范凤翠, 刘胜尧, 张哲, 杜凤焕, 秦勇. 不同土壤水分对设施茄子生长、产量、品质及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1713-1721.
[15]	张永强, 陈传信, 徐其江, 聂石辉, 雷钧杰, 刘昌文. 氮肥增效剂与氮肥减量配施对冬小麦叶片生理及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1319-1325.