棉大卷叶螟对棉花和苘麻2种寄主的偏好性及化感物测定

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2020.04.009

新疆农业科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (4): 650-657.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2020.04.009

棉大卷叶螟对棉花和苘麻2种寄主的偏好性及化感物测定

陈文斌¹, 陈玲^1,2, 王琳丽³, 苏宏华¹, 杨益众¹

1.扬州大学园艺与植物保护学院,江苏扬州 225009;
2.上海都市生活企业发展有限公司,上海 200050;
3.北京海关技术中心,北京 100026

收稿日期:2019-11-04 发布日期:2020-03-26
通信作者: 陈玲(1988-),女,江苏人,农艺师,研究方向为植物保护,(E-mail)690329751@qq.com;杨益众(1960-),男,江苏人,教授,博士,硕/博士生导师,研究方向为害虫综合治理和昆虫生态学,(E-mail)yzyang@yzu.edu.cn
作者简介:陈文斌(1996-),男,江苏人,硕士研究生,研究方向为植物保护,(E-mail)1094041648@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2017YFD0201907); 国家重大转基因专项(2014ZX08012-004)

Host Preference of Sylepta derogata between Cotton and Abutilon and Active Plant Volatile Determination

CHEN Wenbin¹, CHEN Ling^1,2, WANG Linli³, SU Honghua¹, YANG Yizhong¹

1.College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou Jiangsu 225009, China;
2.Shanghai U-life Enterprise Development Co. Ltd., Shanghai 200050,China;
3.Beijing Customs Technology Center, Beijing 100026, China

Received:2019-11-04 Published:2020-03-26
Correspondence author: CHEN Ling(1988-),female, agronomist, research direction for Plant Protection,(E-mail)690329751@qq.com
YANG Yizhong (1960-) , male, professor, research direction for IPM and Insect Ecology, (E-mail) yzyang@yzu.edu.cn
Supported by:
Supported by the National Key Basic R & D Program Project(2017YFD0201907) and the National Major Genetically Modified Project(2014ZX08012-004)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】研究棉花和苘麻挥发物对棉大卷叶螟雌成虫的引诱作用,为开展棉大卷叶螟的绿色防控提供依据。【方法】以棉花品种泗棉3号和苘麻2种寄主为材料,使用Y型嗅觉仪测定棉大卷叶螟雌性成虫在这2种寄主植物上的选择偏好性。借助气-质联用(GC-MS)对收集到的2种寄主挥发物进行组分分析与鉴定,再通过EAG进行行为反应测试,检验卷叶螟成虫对这些特异性挥发物的电生理反应。【结果】棉大卷叶螟雌性成虫选择苘麻上的虫量是棉花上的2.3倍,在苘麻上的产卵量也是棉花上的1.7倍。棉花与苘麻2种寄主上有5种不同的挥发性特异物,棉大卷叶螟成虫对其中的2-乙基苯乙酮和3-乙基庚烷有明显的刺激反应。【结论】棉大卷叶螟成虫在选择产卵寄主时偏好苘麻,棉大卷叶螟雌性成虫对苘麻有明显的趋性,苘麻可作为棉大卷叶螟的引诱寄主。2-乙基苯乙酮和3-乙基庚烷2种挥发物对卷叶螟成虫有显著的刺激作用。

关键词: 棉大卷叶螟; 棉花; 苘麻; 寄主选择偏好; 化感物

Abstract: 【Objective】 With the widespread cultivation of transgenic cotton, Sylepta derogata Fabricius, a leaf borer, has become an important leaf-feeding pest in cotton regions of Yangtze River basin. The attraction effect of cotton and abutilon to S. derogate was studied in order to provide scientific reference for pest green control.【Methods】 Host preference of S. derogate adult females between cotton varieties Simian 3 and abutilon was investigated by using Y-olfactometer. UThe components of the collected two host volatiles were analyzed and identified by gas-mass coupling GC-MS, and then the behavioral response test was performed by EAG to test the electrophysiological response of leaf borer adults to these specific volatiles.【Result】 The results showed that the number of female adult borers on abutilon is more than twice that on cotton, and the number of eggs on abutilon was 1.7 times that on cotton. There were 5 different specific volatiles in the two hosts. The female adults showed strong responses to p-Ethylacetophenone and 3-ethylheptane.【Conclusion】 S. derogate adult females more likely choose abutilon to lay eggs which indicates abutilon can be used as the trap host to control this pest; p-Ethylacetophenone and 3-ethylheptane exhibit significant attractive function which could be developed in future for the green control of this pest.

Key words: Sylepta derogata; cotton; Abutilon theophrasti Medicus; host selection preference; allelochemicais

中图分类号:

S435.65

陈文斌, 陈玲, 王琳丽, 苏宏华, 杨益众. 棉大卷叶螟对棉花和苘麻2种寄主的偏好性及化感物测定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(4): 650-657.

CHEN Wenbin, CHEN Ling, WANG Linli, SU Honghua, YANG Yizhong. Host Preference of Sylepta derogata between Cotton and Abutilon and Active Plant Volatile Determination[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(4): 650-657.

参考文献

[1]Agrawal, A. A. Induced Responses to Herbivory and Increased Plant Performance [J]. Science, 1998, 279(5354):1201-1202.
[2]Symondson W O, Sunderland K D, Greenstone M H. Can generalist predators be effective biocontrol agents [J]. Annu. rev. entomol, 2002, 47(1):561-549.
[3]钦俊德.昆虫与植物的关系[J].生物学通报,1985,20(10):16-18.
QIN Junde.The relationship of insects and plants[J].Bulletin of Biology,1985, 20(10):16-18.
[4]李绍文.生态生物化学(八):植食性昆虫对食物的选择[J].生态学杂志,1991,10(1):65-70.
LI Shaowen. Ecologicalchemistry (VIII): Thechoiceoffoodplantbyphytophagousinsects[J].Chin.J.Ecol.1991, 10(1):65-70.
[5]杜永均,严福顺.植物挥发性次生物质在植食性昆虫、寄生植物和昆虫天敌关系中的作用机理[J].昆虫学报,1994,37(2):233-249.
DU Yongjun,YAN Fushun.The role of plant volatiles in tritrophic interactions among phytophagous insects,their host plants and natural enemies[J].Acta Entomologica Sinica,1994, 37(2):233-249.
[6]闫凤鸣.化学生态学[M].北京:科学出版社, 2003.
YAN Fengming.Chemical Ecology[M].Beijing:Science Press, 2003.
[7]尹姣,薛银根,乔红波,李克斌,胡毅,曹雅忠.粘虫选择产卵场所的意义及颜色在定位中的作用[J].生态学报,2007,27(6):2483-2489.
YING Jiao,XUE Yinggen,QIAO Hongbo,et al.The significance of oviposition site selection and effect of color in orientation by oriental armyworm, Mythimna separata Walker[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007, 27(6):2483-2489.
[8]林克剑.B型烟粉虱寄主选择机制及其应用的研究[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2006.
LIN Kejian.The mechanism of host selection and its application in the manipulation of B biotype Bemisia tabaci(Gennadius)[D].Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2006.
[9]林克剑,吴孔明,张永军,等.棉田种植苘麻诱集B型烟粉虱机制研究[J].应用与环境生物学报,2008,(2):167-171.
LIN Keian,WU Kongming,ZHANG Yongjun,et al. Mechanism of abuti-lontheophrastimedic as a trap plant for control of Bemisia tabaci(Gennadius)biotype B in cotton field[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2008, 14(2):167-171.
[10]林克剑,吴孔明,张永军,等.利用诱集寄主苘麻防治B型烟粉虱的研究[J].中国农业科学,2006,39(7):1379-1386.
LIN Kejian,WU Kongming,ZHANG Yongjun,et al.Evaluation of piemarker abutilon theophrastimedic as a trap plant in the integrated management of Bemisia tabaci(biotype B) in cotton and soybean crops[J].Scientia Agriculture Sinica,2006, 39(7):1379-1386.
[11]刘芳,杨益众,陆宴辉,等.转Bt基因棉对棉大卷叶螟种群动态的影响[J].昆虫知识,2005,42(3):275-277.
LIU Fang,YANG Yizhong,LU Yanhui,et al. Effects of the transgenic Bt cotton on population dynamics of the cotton leaf -roller Sylepta derogata[J].Entomological Knowledge,2005, 42(3):275-277.
[12]余月书,杨益众,陆宴辉. 棉田棉铃虫寄生蜂对常规棉及转Bt棉品种的趋性反应[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(5):845-848.
YU Yueshu,YANG Yizhong,LU Yanhui. Response of parasitic w asps of cotton bollworm to different cotton varieties with transgenic Bacillus thringienthsis genes[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2004, 15(50):845-848.
[13]于惠林,张永军,潘文亮,等.田间条件下不同诱导棉花挥发性物质的鉴定[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(4):859-864.
YU Huilin,ZHANG Yongjun,PAN Wenliang,et al.Identification of volatiles from field cotton plant under different induction treatments[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2007, 18(4):859-864.
[14]郝德君,张永慧,戴华国,等.气相色谱/质谱法分析柏树叶挥发油的化学成分[J].色谱,2006,24(2):82-84.
HAO Dejun,ZHANG Yonghui,DAI huaguo,et al.Analysis of Volatile Constituents in Leaves of Three Cypress Species by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry[J].Chinese Journal of Chromatography,2006, 24(2):82-84.
[15]陈建.棉大卷叶螟主要生物生态学习性的再研究及主害代种群动态分析[D].扬州:扬州大学,2007.
CHEN Jian.Restudies on central biological and ecological characters and analysis on major harmful population dynamics of Sylepta derogata[D].Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2007.
[16]陆佩玲,陈建,武二忠,等.不同寄主对棉大卷叶螟第4代种群增长的影响[J].棉花学报,2011,23(3):241-246.
LU Peilin,CHEN Jian,WU Erzhong,et al.Effect of different hosts on population increase of the fourth generation of Sylepta derogata[J].Cotton Science,2011, 23(3):241-246.
[17]陈建,杨进,陆佩玲,等.棉大卷叶螟的年生活史与种群动态[J].植物保护,2008,34(3):119-122.
CHEN Jian, YANG Jin,LU Peilin,et al. Annual life cycle and population dynamics of Sylepta derogata[J].Plant Protection,2008, 34(3):119-122.
[18]潘洪生,修春丽.锦葵科4种植物上棉大卷叶螟幼虫种群发生动态[J].中国生物防治学报,2016,32(6):708-711.
PAN Hongsheng,XIU Chunli. Population dynamics of leaf roller Haritalodes derogata(Fabricius)larvae on four malvaceae plant species[J].Chinese Journal of Biological Control,2016, 32(6):708-711.
[19]苏建伟,高峰,刘玲,等.棉铃虫危害对转基因棉花挥发物成分和释放速率的影响[J].植物保护,2007,33(1):29-33.
SU Weijian,GAO Feng,LIU Ling,et al.Components and emitting rate of the volatiles released from the transgenic cotton damaged by cotton bollworm[J].Plant Protection,2007, 33(1):29-33.

棉大卷叶螟对棉花和苘麻2种寄主的偏好性及化感物测定

Host Preference of Sylepta derogata between Cotton and Abutilon and Active Plant Volatile Determination

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	陈茂光, 林涛, 张昊, 刘海军, 王一帆, 汤秋香. 地膜类型对棉花生长的影响及自身降解和回收特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108.
[2]	杨川, 张凯, 陈冰, 张慧, 柳萍, 常松, 盛建东. 棉花植株形态特征对不同水分状况的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2120-2127.
[3]	杨国江, 陈云, 林祥群, 何江勇, 刘盛林, 曲永清. 氮肥减施下有机肥替代对滴灌棉花产量、氮素吸收利用及土壤硝态氮的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145.
[4]	李雪玲, 郭俊先, 陈莉, 宋鹤岭, 张众. 不同覆膜宽度对棉花农田环境的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1840-1847.
[5]	阳妮, 玛依拉·玉素音, 杨延龙, 李春平, 张大伟, 徐海江, 赖成霞. 黄萎病枯斑型与黄化型病症棉花叶片的植物挥发物对比[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1975-1986.
[6]	米尔扎提·木塔力甫, 石秀楠, 柏军兵, 祖拜代·阿布都克日木, 吾勒加勒哈斯·阿扎提, 石书兵. 不同脱绒方式及PEG胁迫下对棉花种子活力及幼苗性状的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1561-1568.
[7]	江柱, 张江辉, 白云岗, 杨鹏年, 刘洪波, 肖军, 刘旭辉. 膜下咸水滴灌水肥盐调控对棉花生长及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1389-1397.
[8]	王文涛, 吴博, 邰红忠, 练文明, 戴翠荣, 李双江, 蒲艳梅. 新疆阿拉尔垦区不同播期对棉花生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1413-1422.
[9]	桑志伟, 梁亚军, 龚照龙, 郑巨云, 王俊铎, 李雪源, 陈全家. 不同陆地棉种质资源机采性状分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1088-1098.
[10]	逯涛, 曾庆涛, 张文, 王文博, 王政洋, 杨芮, 孙玉岩. 主成分分析及灰色关联度分析综合评价棉花产量与品质[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1099-1109.
[11]	王宁, 史应武, 牛新湘, 杨红梅, 楚敏, 詹发强, 包慧芳, 杨蓉, 龙宣杞, 丁荣荣. 棉花根际溶磷菌WJP-7发酵培养基优化及防病增产效果[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1263-1270.
[12]	张泓, 吐尔逊江·买买提, 张少民, 张军高, 周小云. 近30 a全国棉花生产区域时空变化及区域优势分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 1028-1040.
[13]	代健敏, 张巨松, 徐新龙, 李始鑫, 翟梦华, 孙明辉. 氮肥运筹对雹后重播受旱棉花生长特性及产量影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 798-809.
[14]	丁宇, 张江辉, 白云岗, 刘洪波, 郑明, 赵经华, 肖军, 韩政宇. 双膜条件下不同干播湿出水分处理对棉花生理、生长特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 810-822.
[15]	张宸, 梁悦, 殷昊, 张应榕, 陈波浪. 氮肥形态和品种对棉花根系形态与氮素积累的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 823-831.