Effects of different factors on the efficacy of Thaxtomin A against Convolvulus arvensis L. and Abutilon theophrasti Medicus

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.04.020

Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (4): 954-961.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.04.020

• Plant Protection · Prataculture • Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of different factors on the efficacy of Thaxtomin A against Convolvulus arvensis L. and Abutilon theophrasti Medicus

GUO Rui¹^,²(), CHEN Yong¹, WANG Xuejing¹, LI Kemei¹(), SONG Suqin²^,³()

1. College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
2. Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management on Crop in Northwestern Oasis, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs /Institute of Plant Protection,Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Urumqi 830091,China
3. Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Special Environmental Microorganisms /Institute of Microbiology, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China

Received:2024-09-21 Online:2025-04-20 Published:2025-06-20
Supported by:
Fostering Highlevel Evperts in Agriculture and Animal Husbandry(2024SNGGGCC033);Earmark Fund of Key S&T Innovation Incubation Project of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences “The Thaxtomins Yield Difference Analysis of Pathogenic Toxin of Potato Scab Disease and Its Weeding Performance of Weeds in Xinjiang”(xjkcpy-202203);Key R & D Program Project of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region “Research and Integrated Application of Green, High-Yield and High-Efficiency Potato Technology in Xinjiang ”(2022B02044-2)

不同环境因子对Thaxtomin A防除田旋花和苘麻药效的影响

郭瑞¹^,²(), 陈勇¹, 汪雪晶¹, 李克梅¹(), 宋素琴²^,³()

1.新疆农业大学农学院,乌鲁木齐 830052
2.新疆维吾尔自治区农业科学院植物保护研究所/农业农村部西北荒漠绿洲作物有害生物综合治理重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830091
3.新疆维吾尔自治区农业科学院微生物研究所/新疆特殊环境微生物重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830091

通讯作者: 李克梅(1972-), 女,江苏如皋人,教授,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向为农作物病害虫综合防控,(E-mail)likemei@xjau.edu.cn;宋素琴(1976-),女,山西长治人,研究员,研究方向为微生物活性产物及作物病害,(E-mail)suqin_song@163.com
作者简介:郭瑞(1999-),女,甘肃酒泉人,硕士研究生,研究方向为马铃薯疮痂病致病链霉菌分离鉴定及代谢产物活性,(E-mail)1522017534@qq.com
基金资助:
天山英才-高层次农牧人才(2024SNGGGCC033);新疆农业科学院科技创新重点培育专项“马铃薯疮痂病病原菌致病毒素Thaxtomins产量差异分析及其对新疆农田杂草的除草性能研究”(xjkcpy-202203);新疆维吾尔自治区重点研发任务专项“新疆马铃薯绿色高产高效栽培技术研究与集成应用”(2022B02044-2)

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 This project aims toclarify the action characteristics of the new biological herbicide Thaxtomin A (TA) in Convolvulus arvensis L. and Abutilon theophrasti Medicus.Finding from which provides a research basis for the practical application of TA. 【Methods】 The effects of different environmental factors (temperature, humidity and rainfall after application) and soil factors (soil organic matter content and soil pH) on the herbicidal activity of TA against Convolvulus arvensis L. and Abutilon theophrasti Medicus were studied by indoor bioassay method. 【Results】 The results showed that at 35℃ / 30℃, 50% humidity, soil pH = 9 and high organic matter content, TA had the best control effect on Convolvulus arvensis. However, 0.5 h rainfall after application would significantly reduce the control effect and should be sprayed again. At 30℃/ 25℃, 70% humidity, soil pH = 8.0, and low soil organic matter content, TA had the best control effect on Abutilon theophrasti. Rainfall within 1 h after application would reduce its control effect, and appropriate amount of pesticide should be applied. 【Conclusion】 Different climatic factors and soil factors have significant effects on the efficacy of TA, At the same time, for different weeds, the changes of environmental factors have different effects on the efficacy of TA. Different temperatures,humidity,duration of light exposure,rainfall after pesticide application,soil organic matter and soil pH value has a certain impact on the herbicidal activity of TA.

Key words: TA; herbicidal activity; environmental factors; Convolvulus arvensis L.; Abutilon theophrasti Medicus

摘要：

【目的】研究新型生物除草剂Thaxtomin A(TA)在田旋花和苘麻作用特性,为TA的实际应用提供理论基础。【方法】采用常规室内生物测定法,分析不同环境因子(温度、湿度和施药后降雨)和土壤因子(土壤有机质含量和土壤pH值)对TA防除田旋花和苘麻除草活性的影响。【结果】在35℃/30℃、50%湿度、土壤pH=9和有机质含量较高时,TA对田旋花其防除效果最佳,但是在施药后0.5 h降雨,会明显降低防效,应再次喷施;在30℃/25℃、70%湿度、土壤pH=8.0、土壤有机质含量较低时,TA对苘麻防效最佳,在施药后1 h内降雨,均会降低其防效,应适量补施药剂。【结论】不同气候因子和土壤因子对TA药效具有显著影响,而不同杂草种类环境因子的改变,对TA防效的影响不同,不同温度、湿度、光照时长、施药后降雨、土壤有机质和土壤pH值对其除草活性均有一定影响。

关键词: TA, 除草活性, 环境因子, 田旋花, 苘麻

CLC Number:

GUO Rui, CHEN Yong, WANG Xuejing, LI Kemei, SONG Suqin. Effects of different factors on the efficacy of Thaxtomin A against Convolvulus arvensis L. and Abutilon theophrasti Medicus[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(4): 954-961.

郭瑞, 陈勇, 汪雪晶, 李克梅, 宋素琴. 不同环境因子对Thaxtomin A防除田旋花和苘麻药效的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(4): 954-961.

Figures/Tables 9

Fig.1 TA structural formula

Tab.1 Changes of root height and fresh weight inhibition rates of Convolvulus arvensis in different TA

处理剂量 Dose processing (μm/mL)	根长 Root length (cm)	根长抑制率 Root length inhibition rate(%)	鲜重 Fresh weight (g)	鲜重抑制率 Fresh weight inhibition rate(%)
CK	8.28	-	0.19	-
35	9.41	-13.647	0.29	-48.40
70	8.70	-5.072	0.27	-40.68
140	7.50	9.432	0.23	-16.71
280	3.38	59.179	0.12	37.39
350	2.72	67.150	0.11	44.39

Tab.2 Changes of root height and fresh weight inhibition rates of Abutilon theophrasti in different TA

处理剂量 Dose processing (μm/mL)	根长 Root length (cm)	根长抑制率 Root length inhibition rate(%)	鲜重 Fresh weight (g)	鲜重抑制率 Fresh weight inhibition rate(%)
CK	7.97	-	0.18	-
35	5.79	27.35	0.13	26.12
70	5.16	35.25	0.12	34.12
140	4.28	46.29	0.09	45.42
280	4.10	48.55	0.09	47.64
350	3.75	52.94	0.07	61.44

Fig.2 Changes of different concentrations of TA on the growth of Convolvulus arvensis and Abutilon theophrasti

Fig.3 Changes of growth inhibition rate of TA on Convolvulus arvensis and Abutilon theophrasti under different temperature conditions Notes:A:inhibition rate of root length of Convolvulus arvensis and Abutilon theophrasti; B: Fresh weight inhibition rate of Convolvulus arvensis and Abutilon theophrasti ; the same as below

Fig.4 Changes of growth inhibition rate of TA on Convolvulus arvensis and Abutilon theophrasti under different humidity conditions

Fig.5 Changes of inhibition rate of rainfall TA on the growth of Convolvulus arvensis and Abutilon theophrasti at different time after spraying

Fig.6 Changes of growth inhibition rate of TA on Convolvulus arvensis and Abutilon theophrasti under different soil organic matter content conditions

Fig.7 Changes of inhibition rate of rainfall TA on the growth of Convolvulus arvensis and Abutilon theophrasti under different soil pH conditions

References 24

[1]	李香菊. 近年我国农田杂草防控中的突出问题与治理对策[J]. 植物保护, 2018, 44(5): 77-84.
	LI Xiangju. Main problems and management strategies of weeds in agricultural fields in China in recent years[J]. Plant Protection, 2018, 44(5): 77-84.
[2]	Varanasi A, Vara Prasad P V, Jugulam M. Impact of climate change factors on weeds and herbicide efficacy[M]// Advances in Agronomy. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2016: 107-146.
[3]	Ramesh K, Matloob A, Aslam F, et al. Weeds in a changing climate: vulnerabilities, consequences, and implications for future weed management[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8: 95. DOI PMID
[4]	Thompson K, Grime J P, Mason G. Seed germination in response to diurnal fluctuations of temperature[J]. Nature, 1977, 267(5607): 147-149.
[5]	Patterson D T, Westbrook J K, Joyce R J V, et al. Weeds, insects, and diseases[J]. Climatic Change, 1999, 43(4): 711-727.
[6]	Hanzlik K, Gerowitt B. Occurrence and distribution of important weed species in German winter oilseed rape fields[J]. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 2012, 119(3): 107-120.
[7]	Walck J L, Hidayati S N, Dixon K W, et al. Climate change and plant regeneration from seed[J]. Global Change Biology, 2011, 17(6): 2145-2161.
[8]	张学坤, 惠慧, 赵静, 等. 新疆棉田田旋花对二甲戊灵的耐药性测定[J]. 农药, 2017, 56(7): 542-545.
	ZHANG Xuekun, HUI Hui, ZHAO Jing, et al. Identification of field bindweed(Convolvulus arvensis L.) tolerance to pendimethal in cotton field in Xinjiang Province[J]. Agrochemicals, 2017, 56(7): 542-545.
[9]	李扬汉. 中国杂草志[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1998.
	LI Yanghan. Weeds in China[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1998.
[10]	王颖. 新疆棉田恶性杂草田旋花的种子繁殖特性及除草剂筛选[D]. 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学, 2019.
	WANG Ying. Seed reproduction characteristics and herbicide screening of malignant weeds in cotton fields in Xinjiang[D]. Ala’er: Tarim University, 2019.
[11]	Loria R, Bignell D R D, Moll S, et al. Thaxtomin biosynthesis: the path to plant pathogenicity in the genus Streptomyces[J]. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 2008, 94(1): 3-10.
[12]	Santos-Cervantes M E, Felix-Gastelum R, Herrera-Rodríguez G, et al. Characterization, pathogenicity and chemical control of Streptomyces acidiscabies associated to potato common scab[J]. American Journal of Potato Research, 2017, 94(1): 14-25.
[13]	Bischoff V, Cookson S J, Wu S, et al. Thaxtomin A affects CESA-complex density, expression of cell wall genes, cell wall composition, and causes ectopic lignification in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2009, 60(3): 955-965. DOI PMID
[14]	King R R, Lawrence C H, Gray J A. Herbicidal properties of the thaxtomin group of phytotoxins[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2001, 49(5): 2298-2301. PMID
[15]	NY/T 1155.3—2006.农药室内生物测定试验准则除草剂第3部分:活性测定试验土壤喷雾法:[S].
	NY/T 1155.3—2006.Pesticides guidelines for laboratory bioactivity tests Part 3: Soil spray application test for herbicide bioactivity[S].
[16]	陈年春. 农药生物测定技术[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 1991.
	CHEN Nianchun. Pesticide bioassay technology[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 1991.
[17]	林方锐, 黄晓慧, 常慧, 等. 新型原卟啉原氧化酶抑制剂Y11049的作用特性[J]. 农药学学报, 2021, 23(5): 886-892.
	LIN Fangrui, HUANG Xiaohui, CHANG Hui, et al. Herbicidal characteristics of a novel protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitor-Y11049[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2021, 23(5): 886-892.
[18]	徐小燕, 唐伟, 姚燕飞, 等. 土壤环境因子对氯胺嘧草醚除草活性的影响[J]. 农药学学报, 2015, 17(3): 357-361.
	XU Xiaoyan, TANG Wei, YAO Yanfei, et al. Influence of soil environmental factors on herbicidal activity of ZJ1835[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2015, 17(3): 357-361.
[19]	柴文杰. 影响土壤处理除草剂二甲戊灵药效的因素[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2018.
	CHAI Wenjie. Factors affecting the efficacy of soil treatment herbicide pendimethalin[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2018.
[20]	Flore J A, Bukovac M J. Pesticide effects on the plant cuticle: III. EPTC effects on the qualitative composition of Brassica oleracea L. leaf Cuticle1[J]. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 103(3): 297-301.
[21]	王志良, 王志超. 影响除草剂除草效果的气候环境因素有哪些[J]. 农民致富之友, 2009,(2): 31.
	WANG Zhiliang, WANG Zhichao. What are the climatic and environmental factors that affect the weeding effect of herbicides[J]. Friend of Farmers' wealth Creation, 2009,(2): 31.
[22]	王颖, 王兰, 马艳, 等. 环境因素对新疆不同地区田旋花种子萌发的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(5): 890-898. DOI
	WANG Ying, WANG Lan, MA Yan, et al. Seed germination of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis L.) from different areas of Xinjiang in response to different environmental factors[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(5): 890-898. DOI
[23]	耿志同, 韩玉军, 张永倩, 等. 不同环境因素对苘麻种子萌发及出苗的影响[J]. 植物保护, 2022, 48(3): 131-135.
	GENG Zhitong, HAN Yujun, ZHANG Yongqian, et al. Effects of environmental factors on seed germination and seedling emergence of Abutilon theophrasti Medikus[J]. Plant Protection, 2022, 48(3): 131-135.
[24]	Souza G S F, Martins D, Pereira M R R, et al. Action of rain on the efficiency of herbicides applied post-emergence in the control of Senna obtusifolia[J]. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 2014, 45(3): 550-557.

Effects of different factors on the efficacy of Thaxtomin A against Convolvulus arvensis L. and Abutilon theophrasti Medicus

不同环境因子对Thaxtomin A防除田旋花和苘麻药效的影响

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 24

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	GAO Feng, MENG Jun, ZENG Yaqi, ZENG Mingmin, XUE Yuheng, SHANG Tingting, YUAN Xinxin, REN Wanlu, YAO Xinkui. Comparative analysis of milk components and plasma metabolomes between colostrum and regular milk periods in Ili horses [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(4): 1002-1013.
[2]	MA Lan, LIU Yingyu, Zulihumaer Aili, ZHENG Baili, DOU Tao, CAI Yuxuan, CHENG Yaling. Molecular characteristics and drug resistance analysis of Staphylococcus aureus in a goose slaughterhouse in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(4): 1022-1031.
[3]	LIU Xuhuan, YU Shan, LIU Yue, SHI Shubing. Comprehensive evaluation of low temperature tolerance of different varieties of spring wheat seeds during germination [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(4): 820-828.
[4]	HOU Liangzhong, TAN Rui, DU Baojun, GUO Tongjun, CAO Hongbin, Guzailinuer Aimaiti. Quality analysis of whole-plant silage corn in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(4): 850-857.
[5]	YANG Ruwei, LIU Yi, Gulimila Rehemutula, SUN Hui, JIANG Yinghong. Effects of different substrates, cuttings densities and times of fertilizers on micropotato production [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(4): 869-875.
[6]	HUA Hui, ZENG Xueling, TANG Zhanghu, WANG Shaopeng, YU Shuiyun, ZHANG Shikui, ZHOU Weiquan. Effects of exogenous sugar alcohol calciumon the quality and volatile substances of Kumaiti apricot [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(4): 876-886.
[7]	CAI Chenyang, GUO Limin, WU Bin. Process optimization of tomato and carrot mixed juice prepared by compound enzyme [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(4): 944-953.
[8]	MA Jilong, Aliya Baidurela, WANG Xinying, LIU Maoxiu, Aijier Abula. Characteristics and influencing factors of soil microbial community diversity in middle reaches of Tarim River [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(4): 982-992.
[9]	MENG Chen, ZENG Yaqi, WANG Jianwen, YAO Xinkui, LUO Penghui, XIE Xiaoyu, LI Pengcheng, LIU Xiaoxiao, WANG Chuankun, MENG Jun. Whole genome resequencing screening of candidate genes for lactation yield in Kazakh horses [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(4): 993-1001.
[10]	ZHAO Yupeng, CHEN Bolang, WANG Zhiguo, FU Yanbo, BIAN Qingyong. Effects of different carbon source inputs on the characteristics of compacted clay and the growth of cotton seedlings [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(3): 556-571.
[11]	ZHAO Yi, WU Hongqi, FAN Yanmin, SHENG Jiandong, GU Haibin, SHI Mingjie. Analysis of spatiotemporal variation characteristics of wheat dry hot wind disasters in Xinjiang in the past 60 years [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(3): 600-608.
[12]	ZHANG Xiaole, Wueren Ahebieerdi, Entemake Bulatibai, Muguli Muhaxi, YUAN Qingqing, BAI Ru. Changes in bacterial diversity and community structure in rhizosphere soil of lavender with different continuous cropping years [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(3): 706-714.
[13]	XIE Wenwen, WANG Huinan, Ainijiang Ersiman, ZHU Jing, GU Meiying, ZHANG Zhidong. Multimethod screening of bacterial diversity and related strains in radiation-contaminated areas [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(3): 715-722.
[14]	YI Fengyan, SUN Shixian, GUO Chengyu, YAN Xiaohong, FANG Yongyu, YANG Ding, DING Haijun. Drought resistance evaluation of 11 wild Agropyron cristatum germplasm at germination stage under PEG simulated stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(3): 723-731.
[15]	SHENG Yangqian, ZHOU Jiaqi, HUANG Yangjie, ZHANG Meiqi, XUE Nana. Effects of Sophora alopecuroides L. extracts on allelopathy of Hami melon seed germination [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(3): 732-738.