Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (3): 723-731.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.03.022
• Plant Protection·Soil Fertilizer·Microbes • Previous Articles Next Articles
YI Fengyan1(), SUN Shixian2, GUO Chengyu1, YAN Xiaohong2, FANG Yongyu1, YANG Ding1, DING Haijun1(
)
Received:
2024-08-18
Online:
2025-03-20
Published:
2025-05-14
Correspondence author:
DING Haijun
Supported by:
伊风艳1(), 孙世贤2, 郭呈宇1, 闫晓红2, 房永雨1, 杨鼎1, 丁海君1(
)
通讯作者:
丁海君
作者简介:
伊风艳(1984-),女,内蒙古通辽人,副研究员,博士,研究方向为牧草遗传育种与种子生态学,(E-mail) yifengyanonly88@126.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
YI Fengyan, SUN Shixian, GUO Chengyu, YAN Xiaohong, FANG Yongyu, YANG Ding, DING Haijun. Drought resistance evaluation of 11 wild Agropyron cristatum germplasm at germination stage under PEG simulated stress[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(3): 723-731.
伊风艳, 孙世贤, 郭呈宇, 闫晓红, 房永雨, 杨鼎, 丁海君. PEG模拟干旱胁迫下11份野生冰草种质资源萌发期抗旱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(3): 723-731.
编号 No | 采集地点 Collection site | 海拔 Altitude(km) | 生境 Habitat | 土壤类型 Soil type | 千粒重 1000-grain weight(g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | 包头市达茂旗 | 1 630 | 天然草地 | 沙壤土 | 1.796 |
A2 | 包头市达茂旗 | 1 584 | 天然草地 | 沙壤土 | 1.810 |
A3 | 包头市大青山 | 1 358 | - | 壤土 | 2.311 |
A4 | 锡林浩特市白音锡勒牧场 | 1 100 | 天然草地 | 沙壤土 | 1.880 |
A5 | 锡林浩特市白音锡勒牧场 | 1 235 | 天然草地 | 沙壤土 | 2.252 |
A6 | 锡林浩特市 | 1 010 | 天然草地 | 沙壤土 | 1.760 |
A7 | 锡林浩特市白音锡勒牧场 | 1 278 | 天然草地 | 壤土 | 1.851 |
A8 | 锡林浩特市朝克乌拉苏木 | 919 | 天然草地 | 沙壤土 | 1.795 |
A9 | 锡林浩特市毛登牧场 | 1 125 | 天然草地 | 沙壤土 | 1.862 |
A10 | 锡林郭勒盟正镶白旗 | 1 374 | 天然草地 | 壤土 | 1.655 |
A11 | 锡林郭勒盟正蓝旗 | 1291 | 沙地 | 沙土 | 1.963 |
Tab.1 Information of 11 Agropyron cristatum germplasm resources
编号 No | 采集地点 Collection site | 海拔 Altitude(km) | 生境 Habitat | 土壤类型 Soil type | 千粒重 1000-grain weight(g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | 包头市达茂旗 | 1 630 | 天然草地 | 沙壤土 | 1.796 |
A2 | 包头市达茂旗 | 1 584 | 天然草地 | 沙壤土 | 1.810 |
A3 | 包头市大青山 | 1 358 | - | 壤土 | 2.311 |
A4 | 锡林浩特市白音锡勒牧场 | 1 100 | 天然草地 | 沙壤土 | 1.880 |
A5 | 锡林浩特市白音锡勒牧场 | 1 235 | 天然草地 | 沙壤土 | 2.252 |
A6 | 锡林浩特市 | 1 010 | 天然草地 | 沙壤土 | 1.760 |
A7 | 锡林浩特市白音锡勒牧场 | 1 278 | 天然草地 | 壤土 | 1.851 |
A8 | 锡林浩特市朝克乌拉苏木 | 919 | 天然草地 | 沙壤土 | 1.795 |
A9 | 锡林浩特市毛登牧场 | 1 125 | 天然草地 | 沙壤土 | 1.862 |
A10 | 锡林郭勒盟正镶白旗 | 1 374 | 天然草地 | 壤土 | 1.655 |
A11 | 锡林郭勒盟正蓝旗 | 1291 | 沙地 | 沙土 | 1.963 |
编号 No | 相对发芽率RGP | 相对发芽势RGR | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | |
A1 | 106.73Aa | 84.06Cb | 62.20Cc | 38.63Bd | 7.56Be | 116.42Ca | 91.79DEb | 63.24Eb | 6.13Fc | 0.00Ad |
A2 | 92.37CDa | 79.68CDb | 70.34Bc | 25.65Dd | 9.32ABe | 138.38Aa | 126.51Bb | 94.19ABb | 17.68Ec | 0.00Ad |
A3 | 78.30Ea | 61.01Fb | 36.77Dc | 16.07Ed | 0.00Ee | 97.22Da | 75.56FGb | 59.44Ec | 9.44Fd | 0.00Ae |
A4 | 100.74Ba | 92.54Bb | 81.36Ac | 18.65Ed | 0.00Ee | 98.85Da | 78.26Fb | 58.95Ec | 7.23Fd | 0.00Ae |
A5 | 97.04BCa | 84.32Cb | 72.41Bc | 34.33Cd | 7.46Be | 105.56Da | 96.39CDb | 85.48Cc | 25.54CDd | 0.00Ae |
A6 | 100.90Ba | 78.45Eb | 62.96Cc | 39.65Bd | 9.49ABe | 126.52Ba | 123.48Ba | 100.25Ab | 53.03Ac | 0.00Ad |
A7 | 88.19Da | 83.48Cb | 71.67Bc | 46.46Ad | 8.66ABe | 103.92Da | 100.11Ca | 88.45BCb | 34.53Bc | 0.00Ae |
A8 | 102.31ABa | 80.16CDb | 72.55Bc | 39.71Bd | 4.58Ce | 128.43Ba | 86.82Eb | 83.01Cb | 50.87Ac | 0.00Ad |
A9 | 104.48Aa | 96.44Ab | 74.11Bc | 36.60BCd | 2.68De | 141.90Aa | 135.64Aa | 83.42Cb | 20.88DEc | 0.00Ad |
A10 | 106.98Aa | 100.00Ab | 86.19Ac | 39.60Bd | 9.89Ae | 122.55BCa | 100.00Cb | 73.41Dc | 22.43DEd | 0.00Ae |
A11 | 75.84Ea | 62.62Fb | 40.68Dc | 31.90Cd | 7.67Be | 64.90Ea | 63.43Ha | 41.16Fb | 29.29Cc | 0.00Ad |
Tab.2 Changes of drought stress on relative germination percentage and relative germination rate of 11 wild Agropyron cristatum germplasm resources
编号 No | 相对发芽率RGP | 相对发芽势RGR | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | |
A1 | 106.73Aa | 84.06Cb | 62.20Cc | 38.63Bd | 7.56Be | 116.42Ca | 91.79DEb | 63.24Eb | 6.13Fc | 0.00Ad |
A2 | 92.37CDa | 79.68CDb | 70.34Bc | 25.65Dd | 9.32ABe | 138.38Aa | 126.51Bb | 94.19ABb | 17.68Ec | 0.00Ad |
A3 | 78.30Ea | 61.01Fb | 36.77Dc | 16.07Ed | 0.00Ee | 97.22Da | 75.56FGb | 59.44Ec | 9.44Fd | 0.00Ae |
A4 | 100.74Ba | 92.54Bb | 81.36Ac | 18.65Ed | 0.00Ee | 98.85Da | 78.26Fb | 58.95Ec | 7.23Fd | 0.00Ae |
A5 | 97.04BCa | 84.32Cb | 72.41Bc | 34.33Cd | 7.46Be | 105.56Da | 96.39CDb | 85.48Cc | 25.54CDd | 0.00Ae |
A6 | 100.90Ba | 78.45Eb | 62.96Cc | 39.65Bd | 9.49ABe | 126.52Ba | 123.48Ba | 100.25Ab | 53.03Ac | 0.00Ad |
A7 | 88.19Da | 83.48Cb | 71.67Bc | 46.46Ad | 8.66ABe | 103.92Da | 100.11Ca | 88.45BCb | 34.53Bc | 0.00Ae |
A8 | 102.31ABa | 80.16CDb | 72.55Bc | 39.71Bd | 4.58Ce | 128.43Ba | 86.82Eb | 83.01Cb | 50.87Ac | 0.00Ad |
A9 | 104.48Aa | 96.44Ab | 74.11Bc | 36.60BCd | 2.68De | 141.90Aa | 135.64Aa | 83.42Cb | 20.88DEc | 0.00Ad |
A10 | 106.98Aa | 100.00Ab | 86.19Ac | 39.60Bd | 9.89Ae | 122.55BCa | 100.00Cb | 73.41Dc | 22.43DEd | 0.00Ae |
A11 | 75.84Ea | 62.62Fb | 40.68Dc | 31.90Cd | 7.67Be | 64.90Ea | 63.43Ha | 41.16Fb | 29.29Cc | 0.00Ad |
编号 No | 相对发芽指数RGI | 相对活力指数RVI | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | |
A1 | 112.50BCa | 86.76CDb | 58.55Dc | 24.19EFd | 4.12De | 121.27Aa | 87.99Bb | 47.95CDc | 12.96EFd | 1.28Be |
A2 | 109.62Da | 98.81Bb | 72.27BCc | 22.28Fd | 5.68ABe | 100.18Ca | 85.43BCb | 46.20Dc | 12.67EFd | 0.45Ee |
A3 | 86.20Fa | 62.50Eb | 37.01Cc | 12.99Gd | 0.00Ge | 88.49Da | 56.94EFb | 26.82Ec | 3.50Gd | 0.00Gd |
A4 | 101.68Ea | 90.07Cb | 72.15BCc | 10.83Gd | 0.00Ge | 104.11Ca | 83.14BCb | 45.89Dc | 4.57Gd | 0.00Ge |
A5 | 110.47Da | 90.74Cb | 76.07Bc | 26.47EFd | 4.85BCDe | 101.72Ca | 75.48Db | 51.83BCc | 11.41EFd | 0.56Ee |
A6 | 117.19ABa | 105.88Ab | 74.40CBc | 38.08ABd | 5.12BCe | 106.33BCa | 94.95Ab | 59.86Ac | 26.82Ad | 0.98Ce |
A7 | 87.84Fa | 82.01Db | 72.84BCc | 32.62CDd | 4.42CDe | 78.97Ea | 58.48Eb | 45.33Dc | 16.38CDd | 0.64DEe |
A8 | 121.93Aa | 80.56Db | 68.19Cc | 35.48BCd | 2.46Ee | 127.82Aa | 75.72Db | 52.53Bc | 18.45Bd | 0.37EFe |
A9 | 109.44Da | 107.40Aa | 75.92Bb | 24.90EFc | 1.54Fd | 122.83Aa | 98.34Ab | 59.03Ac | 11.06Fd | 0.19FGe |
A10 | 112.95BCa | 106.45Ab | 90.33Ac | 41.18Ad | 6.21Ae | 112.75Ba | 95.83Ab | 44.31Dc | 18.97BCd | 1.59Ae |
A11 | 72.63Ga | 65.15Eb | 44.13Ec | 28.59DEd | 4.81BCDe | 70.47Fa | 51.98Fb | 28.18Ec | 14.62DEd | 0.85CDe |
Tab.3 Changes of drought stress on relative germination index and relative vigor index of 11 wild Agropyron cristatum germplasm resources
编号 No | 相对发芽指数RGI | 相对活力指数RVI | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | |
A1 | 112.50BCa | 86.76CDb | 58.55Dc | 24.19EFd | 4.12De | 121.27Aa | 87.99Bb | 47.95CDc | 12.96EFd | 1.28Be |
A2 | 109.62Da | 98.81Bb | 72.27BCc | 22.28Fd | 5.68ABe | 100.18Ca | 85.43BCb | 46.20Dc | 12.67EFd | 0.45Ee |
A3 | 86.20Fa | 62.50Eb | 37.01Cc | 12.99Gd | 0.00Ge | 88.49Da | 56.94EFb | 26.82Ec | 3.50Gd | 0.00Gd |
A4 | 101.68Ea | 90.07Cb | 72.15BCc | 10.83Gd | 0.00Ge | 104.11Ca | 83.14BCb | 45.89Dc | 4.57Gd | 0.00Ge |
A5 | 110.47Da | 90.74Cb | 76.07Bc | 26.47EFd | 4.85BCDe | 101.72Ca | 75.48Db | 51.83BCc | 11.41EFd | 0.56Ee |
A6 | 117.19ABa | 105.88Ab | 74.40CBc | 38.08ABd | 5.12BCe | 106.33BCa | 94.95Ab | 59.86Ac | 26.82Ad | 0.98Ce |
A7 | 87.84Fa | 82.01Db | 72.84BCc | 32.62CDd | 4.42CDe | 78.97Ea | 58.48Eb | 45.33Dc | 16.38CDd | 0.64DEe |
A8 | 121.93Aa | 80.56Db | 68.19Cc | 35.48BCd | 2.46Ee | 127.82Aa | 75.72Db | 52.53Bc | 18.45Bd | 0.37EFe |
A9 | 109.44Da | 107.40Aa | 75.92Bb | 24.90EFc | 1.54Fd | 122.83Aa | 98.34Ab | 59.03Ac | 11.06Fd | 0.19FGe |
A10 | 112.95BCa | 106.45Ab | 90.33Ac | 41.18Ad | 6.21Ae | 112.75Ba | 95.83Ab | 44.31Dc | 18.97BCd | 1.59Ae |
A11 | 72.63Ga | 65.15Eb | 44.13Ec | 28.59DEd | 4.81BCDe | 70.47Fa | 51.98Fb | 28.18Ec | 14.62DEd | 0.85CDe |
编号 No | 相对苗高RSH | 相对根长RRL | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | |
A1 | 112.06Aa | 104.90Ab | 95.47Ac | 69.01BCd | 37.82Ae | 105.25BCa | 99.34Ab | 74.01ABc | 44.37BCd | 26.91Ae |
A2 | 81.35Fa | 76.95Gab | 69.99Eb | 68.98BCb | 5.15EFc | 98.55DEa | 93.20ABCb | 59.69Dc | 48.42Bd | 10.12CDe |
A3 | 111.80Aa | 96.86Bb | 69.75Ec | 34.77Ed | 0.00Fe | 95.31DEa | 86.44CDEb | 74.63ABc | 20.68Gd | 0.00Ee |
A4 | 95.60DEa | 89.35CDEab | 83.95BCb | 52.31Dc | 0.00Fd | 107.40Ba | 94.07ABb | 53.78Ec | 36.79Dd | 0.00Ee |
A5 | 92.42Ea | 81.68FGb | 72.07DEc | 61.71Cd | 14.63CDe | 91.82EFa | 84.33DEFb | 65.55Cc | 30.83EFd | 9.47De |
A6 | 100.80CDa | 95.80BCb | 86.07BCc | 76.14ABd | 20.57Ce | 83.43Ga | 80.67EFab | 75.80Ab | 64.14Ac | 17.26Bd |
A7 | 95.04DEa | 88.18DEFa | 78.23CDb | 76.86Ab | 16.30CDc | 86.91FGa | 61.48Gb | 52.91Ec | 34.68DEd | 13.25Ce |
A8 | 102.74BCab | 92.90BCDa | 84.37BCb | 68.20Cc | 10.47DEd | 106.90BCa | 95.06ABb | 70.36Bc | 37.12Dd | 18.74Be |
A9 | 106.88ABa | 106.23Aa | 83.64Bb | 68.03Cc | 10.73DEd | 115.80Aa | 82.02DEFb | 73.87ABb | 28.87Fc | 12.64CDd |
A10 | 99.14CDa | 91.99BCDb | 71.43DEc | 67.43Cc | 38.63Ad | 100.23CDa | 88.77BCDb | 35.43Fc | 32.89DEFc | 17.32Bd |
A11 | 99.10CDa | 83.68EFb | 71.57DEc | 63.94Cd | 27.39Be | 95.71DEa | 77.55Fb | 58.65Dc | 42.43Cd | 11.10CDe |
Tab.4 Changes of drought stress on relative root length and relative seedling height of 11 wild Agropyron cristatum germplasm resources
编号 No | 相对苗高RSH | 相对根长RRL | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | |
A1 | 112.06Aa | 104.90Ab | 95.47Ac | 69.01BCd | 37.82Ae | 105.25BCa | 99.34Ab | 74.01ABc | 44.37BCd | 26.91Ae |
A2 | 81.35Fa | 76.95Gab | 69.99Eb | 68.98BCb | 5.15EFc | 98.55DEa | 93.20ABCb | 59.69Dc | 48.42Bd | 10.12CDe |
A3 | 111.80Aa | 96.86Bb | 69.75Ec | 34.77Ed | 0.00Fe | 95.31DEa | 86.44CDEb | 74.63ABc | 20.68Gd | 0.00Ee |
A4 | 95.60DEa | 89.35CDEab | 83.95BCb | 52.31Dc | 0.00Fd | 107.40Ba | 94.07ABb | 53.78Ec | 36.79Dd | 0.00Ee |
A5 | 92.42Ea | 81.68FGb | 72.07DEc | 61.71Cd | 14.63CDe | 91.82EFa | 84.33DEFb | 65.55Cc | 30.83EFd | 9.47De |
A6 | 100.80CDa | 95.80BCb | 86.07BCc | 76.14ABd | 20.57Ce | 83.43Ga | 80.67EFab | 75.80Ab | 64.14Ac | 17.26Bd |
A7 | 95.04DEa | 88.18DEFa | 78.23CDb | 76.86Ab | 16.30CDc | 86.91FGa | 61.48Gb | 52.91Ec | 34.68DEd | 13.25Ce |
A8 | 102.74BCab | 92.90BCDa | 84.37BCb | 68.20Cc | 10.47DEd | 106.90BCa | 95.06ABb | 70.36Bc | 37.12Dd | 18.74Be |
A9 | 106.88ABa | 106.23Aa | 83.64Bb | 68.03Cc | 10.73DEd | 115.80Aa | 82.02DEFb | 73.87ABb | 28.87Fc | 12.64CDd |
A10 | 99.14CDa | 91.99BCDb | 71.43DEc | 67.43Cc | 38.63Ad | 100.23CDa | 88.77BCDb | 35.43Fc | 32.89DEFc | 17.32Bd |
A11 | 99.10CDa | 83.68EFb | 71.57DEc | 63.94Cd | 27.39Be | 95.71DEa | 77.55Fb | 58.65Dc | 42.43Cd | 11.10CDe |
萌发指标 Germination index | 相对发芽势 RGR | 相对发芽率 RGP | 相对发芽指数 RGI | 相对活力指数 RVI | 相对苗高 RSH | 相对根长 RRL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGR | 1 | |||||
RGP | 0.940** | 1 | ||||
RGI | 0.968** | 0.981** | 1 | |||
RVI | 0.944** | 0.945** | 0.966** | 1 | ||
RSH | 0.837** | 0.839** | 0.859** | 0.831** | 1 | |
RRL | 0.894** | 0.902** | 0.899** | 0.930** | 0.900** | 1 |
Tab.5 correlation coefficient of each growth index of 11 wild Agropyron cristatum germplasm resources
萌发指标 Germination index | 相对发芽势 RGR | 相对发芽率 RGP | 相对发芽指数 RGI | 相对活力指数 RVI | 相对苗高 RSH | 相对根长 RRL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGR | 1 | |||||
RGP | 0.940** | 1 | ||||
RGI | 0.968** | 0.981** | 1 | |||
RVI | 0.944** | 0.945** | 0.966** | 1 | ||
RSH | 0.837** | 0.839** | 0.859** | 0.831** | 1 | |
RRL | 0.894** | 0.902** | 0.899** | 0.930** | 0.900** | 1 |
编号 No | 隶属函数值The value of the membership function | D值 D value | 排序 Ranking | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
相对发芽率 RGP | 相对发芽势 RGR | 相对发芽 指数 RGI | 相对活力 指数 RVI | 相对苗高 RSH | 相对根长 RRL | |||
A1 | 0.549 0 | 0.463 0 | 0.480 1 | 0.525 6 | 0.502 4 | 0.506 0 | 0.504 5 | 1 |
A2 | 0.509 1 | 0.422 2 | 0.528 3 | 0.468 9 | 0.525 6 | 0.469 3 | 0.484 9 | 4 |
A3 | 0.409 9 | 0.533 3 | 0.351 0 | 0.400 7 | 0.467 5 | 0.411 9 | 0.430 3 | 10 |
A4 | 0.387 8 | 0.351 3 | 0.432 3 | 0.377 6 | 0.387 9 | 0.395 5 | 0.387 7 | 11 |
A5 | 0.427 3 | 0.380 7 | 0.537 0 | 0.454 3 | 0.520 2 | 0.594 8 | 0.483 6 | 6 |
A6 | 0.544 6 | 0.481 8 | 0.524 7 | 0.460 2 | 0.466 8 | 0.499 7 | 0.496 3 | 3 |
A7 | 0.466 1 | 0.407 1 | 0.528 6 | 0.548 6 | 0.463 8 | 0.493 7 | 0.483 9 | 5 |
A8 | 0.426 4 | 0.443 6 | 0.489 9 | 0.534 1 | 0.558 0 | 0.435 1 | 0.478 8 | 7 |
A9 | 0.527 2 | 0.402 1 | 0.478 3 | 0.576 6 | 0.532 1 | 0.500 1 | 0.501 7 | 2 |
A10 | 0.443 3 | 0.371 6 | 0.504 0 | 0.521 7 | 0.518 3 | 0.447 6 | 0.465 1 | 8 |
A11 | 0.418 2 | 0.366 5 | 0.456 6 | 0.476 6 | 0.589 4 | 0.387 8 | 0.444 8 | 9 |
Tab.6 Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of 11 wild Agropyron cristatum germplasm resources at germination stage
编号 No | 隶属函数值The value of the membership function | D值 D value | 排序 Ranking | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
相对发芽率 RGP | 相对发芽势 RGR | 相对发芽 指数 RGI | 相对活力 指数 RVI | 相对苗高 RSH | 相对根长 RRL | |||
A1 | 0.549 0 | 0.463 0 | 0.480 1 | 0.525 6 | 0.502 4 | 0.506 0 | 0.504 5 | 1 |
A2 | 0.509 1 | 0.422 2 | 0.528 3 | 0.468 9 | 0.525 6 | 0.469 3 | 0.484 9 | 4 |
A3 | 0.409 9 | 0.533 3 | 0.351 0 | 0.400 7 | 0.467 5 | 0.411 9 | 0.430 3 | 10 |
A4 | 0.387 8 | 0.351 3 | 0.432 3 | 0.377 6 | 0.387 9 | 0.395 5 | 0.387 7 | 11 |
A5 | 0.427 3 | 0.380 7 | 0.537 0 | 0.454 3 | 0.520 2 | 0.594 8 | 0.483 6 | 6 |
A6 | 0.544 6 | 0.481 8 | 0.524 7 | 0.460 2 | 0.466 8 | 0.499 7 | 0.496 3 | 3 |
A7 | 0.466 1 | 0.407 1 | 0.528 6 | 0.548 6 | 0.463 8 | 0.493 7 | 0.483 9 | 5 |
A8 | 0.426 4 | 0.443 6 | 0.489 9 | 0.534 1 | 0.558 0 | 0.435 1 | 0.478 8 | 7 |
A9 | 0.527 2 | 0.402 1 | 0.478 3 | 0.576 6 | 0.532 1 | 0.500 1 | 0.501 7 | 2 |
A10 | 0.443 3 | 0.371 6 | 0.504 0 | 0.521 7 | 0.518 3 | 0.447 6 | 0.465 1 | 8 |
A11 | 0.418 2 | 0.366 5 | 0.456 6 | 0.476 6 | 0.589 4 | 0.387 8 | 0.444 8 | 9 |
[1] |
张佳宁, 刘坤. 植物调节萌发时间和萌发地点的机制[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(1): 328-338.
DOI |
ZHANG Jianing, LIU Kun. Mechanisms for plants detecting the optimum time and place to germinate[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(1): 328-338.
DOI |
|
[2] | 符开欣, 刘新, 张新全, 等. 六份川西北短芒披碱草种质萌发期抗旱性评价[J]. 中国草地学报, 2017, 39(2): 41-47. |
FU Kaixin, LIU Xin, ZHANG Xinquan, et al. Evaluation of drought resistance of six Elymus breviaristatus accessions from the northwest plateau of Sichuan Province at germination stage[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2017, 39(2): 41-47. | |
[3] | 樊瑀, 董淑琦, 原向阳, 等. 谷子种质资源萌发期抗旱性综合评价及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2022, 27(6): 42-54. |
FAN Yu, DONG Shuqi, YUAN Xiangyang, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of foxtail millet germplasm resources during germination period and drought resistance index screening[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2022, 27(6): 42-54. | |
[4] | 李培英, 孙宗玖, 阿不来提. PEG模拟干旱胁迫下29份偃麦草种质种子萌发期抗旱性评价[J]. 中国草地学报, 2010, 32(1): 32-39. |
LI Peiying, SUN Zongjiu, Abulaiti. Evaluation of drought resistance of 29 accessions of elytrigria Repens at seed germination stage under PEG-6000 stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2010, 32(1): 32-39. | |
[5] |
王平, 王沛, 孙万斌, 等. 8份披碱草属牧草苗期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(2): 397-404.
DOI |
WANG Ping, WANG Pei, SUN Wanbin, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of eight Elymus germplasms at seedling stage[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(2): 397-404.
DOI |
|
[6] | 孙可蒙, 隋晓青, 王玉祥, 等. PEG模拟干旱胁迫下12份新疆野生无芒雀麦种质萌发期抗旱性评价[J]. 草原与草坪, 2020, 40(6): 102-107, 117. |
SUN Kemeng, SUI Xiaoqing, WANG Yuxiang, et al. Evaluation of drought resistance for 12 Bromus inermis germplasms in Xinjiang under PEG stress at germination stage[J]. Grassland and Turf, 2020, 40(6): 102-107, 117. | |
[7] | 云锦凤, 赵彦, 石凤敏, 等. 蒙古冰草肌动蛋白基因片段的克隆与组织表达分析[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(2): 170-176. |
YUN Jinfeng, ZHAO Yan, SHI Fengmin, et al. Cloning and analysis on tissue specific expression of a Actin gene fragment from Agropyron mongolicum[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(2): 170-176. | |
[8] | Zhao Y, Gao C P, Shi F L, et al. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of drought responsive genes and proteins in Agropyron mongolicum Keng[J]. Current Plant Biology, 2018, 14: 19-29. |
[9] | 曾亮, 袁庆华, 王方, 等. 冰草属植物种质资源遗传多样性的ISSR分析[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(1): 260-267. |
ZENG Liang, YUAN Qinghua, WANG Fang, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of Agropyron germplasm resources by ISSR[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(1): 260-267. | |
[10] | 杨靖, 张晓明, 陈越, 等. 内蒙古30份冰草属种质资源表型性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 中国草地学报, 2023, 45(9): 1-11. |
YANG Jing, ZHANG Xiaoming, CHEN Yue, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of phenotypic traits of 30 Agropyron genus germplasm resources in Inner Mongolia[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2023, 45(9): 1-11. | |
[11] |
焦树英, 韩国栋. 若干禾本科牧草在荒漠草原区的适应性及其生产性能和营养价值评价[J]. 草地学报, 2007, 15(4): 327-334.
DOI |
JIAO Shuying, HAN Guodong. The adaptation and evaluation of perennial grasses in desert steppe area[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2007, 15(4): 327-334.
DOI |
|
[12] | 刘洁琼. 不同冰草品种(系)生产性能及营养品质的比较研究[D]. 秦皇岛: 河北科技师范学院, 2023. |
LIU Jieqiong. Comparative study on production performance and nutritional quality of different Agropyron varieties (lines)[D]. Qinhuangdao: Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology, 2023. | |
[13] |
李晓全, 高有汉, 刘扬, 等. 我国北方9份旱生—沙生植物蒙古冰草遗传多样性研究[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(3): 77-85.
DOI |
LI Xiaoquan, GAO Youhan, LIU Yang, et al. The genetic diversity of 9 populations of dry-desert Agropyron mongolicumcollected in northern China[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(3): 77-85.
DOI |
|
[14] |
Rajjou L, Duval M, Gallardo K, et al. Seed germination and vigor[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2012, 63: 507-533.
DOI PMID |
[15] | 徐恒恒, 黎妮, 刘树君, 等. 种子萌发及其调控的研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(7): 1141-1156. |
XU Hengheng, LI Ni, LIU Shujun, et al. Research progress in seed germination and its control[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014, 40(7): 1141-1156. | |
[16] | 王彦荣. 种子引发的研究现状[J]. 草业学报, 2004, 13(4): 7-12. |
WANG Yanrong. Current status of seed priming research[J]. Acta Pratacultural Science, 2004, 13(4): 7-12. | |
[17] | 王慧慧, 王普昶, 赵钢, 等. 干旱胁迫下白刺花种子大小与萌发对策[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(2): 335-341. |
WANG Huihui, WANG Puchang, ZHAO Gang, et al. Seed size and germination strategy of Sophora davidii under drought stress[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(2): 335-341. | |
[18] | Soeda Y, Konings M C J M, Vorst O, et al. Gene expression programs during Brassica oleracea seed maturation, osmopriming, and germination are indicators of progression of the germination process and the stress tolerance level[J]. Plant Physiology, 2005, 137(1): 354-368. |
[19] | 廖博通, 陈琳, 唐可兰, 等. PEG模拟干旱胁迫下辣椒种子萌发特性及抗旱性评价[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2022, 35(3): 64-69. |
LIAO Botong, CHEN Lin, TANG Kelan, et al. Germination and drought tolerance evaluation of pepper seeds under PEG simulated drought stress[J]. China Cucurbits and Vegetables, 2022, 35(3): 64-69. | |
[20] | 杨旭东, 聂慧, 侯建华, 等. PEG模拟干旱胁迫对向日葵种子萌发的影响[J]. 种子, 2016, 35(5): 71-75. |
YANG Xudong, NIE Hui, HOU Jianhua, et al. Effect of polyethylene glycol(PEG)simulated drought stress on seed germination of sunflower[J]. Seed, 2016, 35(5): 71-75. | |
[21] |
蔺豆豆, 赵桂琴, 琚泽亮, 等. 15份燕麦材料苗期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(11): 108-121.
DOI |
LIN Doudou, ZHAO Guiqin, JU Zeliang, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of 15 oat varieties at the seedling stage[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(11): 108-121.
DOI |
|
[22] | 张辰昊, 热孜亚·艾力, 晁跃辉, 等. 21份杂花苜蓿种质萌发期抗旱性评价[J]. 中国草地学报, 2022, 44(3): 58-65. |
ZHANG Chenhao, Reziya ili, CHAO Yuehui, et al. Evaluation of drought resistance of 21 variegated alfalfa cultivars during germination[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2022, 44(3): 58-65. | |
[23] | 黄莉娟, 赵丽丽, 唐华江, 等. 不同毛花雀稗种质对干旱胁迫的响应及其抗旱性评价[J]. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32(11): 2557-2563. |
HUANG Lijuan, ZHAO Lili, TANG Huajiang, et al. Drought stress responses of six Paspalum dilatatum germplasms and drought resistance evaluation[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 32(11): 2557-2563. | |
[24] |
毛培春, 孟林, 高洪文, 等. 20份无芒雀麦种质材料苗期抗旱性综合评价及光合特性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2011, 19(4): 619-624, 630.
DOI |
MAO Peichun, MENG Lin, GAO Hongwen, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance and photosynthetic characteristic of 20 Bromus inermis leyss. accessions at seedling stage[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2011, 19(4): 619-624, 630.
DOI |
|
[25] |
石永红, 万里强, 刘建宁, 等. 多年生黑麦草抗旱性主成分及隶属函数分析[J]. 草地学报, 2010, 18(5): 669-672.
DOI |
SHI Yonghong, WAN Liqiang, LIU Jianning, et al. Analysis of the principal components and the subordinate function of Lolium perenne drought resistance[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2010, 18(5): 669-672.
DOI |
[1] | SHENG Yangqian, ZHOU Jiaqi, HUANG Yangjie, ZHANG Meiqi, XUE Nana. Effects of Sophora alopecuroides L. extracts on allelopathy of Hami melon seed germination [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(3): 732-738. |
[2] | WANG Yongpan, MA Jun, LI Chenyu, YAO Mengyao, WANG Zixuan, HUANG Lingzhi, ZHU Haiyan, LIU Wanrong, LI Bo, YANG Yang, GAO Wenwei. Salt tolerance in germination period of cotton seeds based on convolutional neural network and synthetic dataset [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 261-269. |
[3] | GONG Xuehua, WANG Xiaowu, FU Kaiyun, JIA Zunzun, TURSUN Ahmat, QIAO Xiaoyan, YE Xiaoqin, GUO Wenchao, DING Xinhua. Effects of weed seeds bank and environmental factors on weed seeds germination in oasis irrigation areas of Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 49-59. |
[4] | ZENG Wanying, GENG Hongwei, CHENG Yukun, LI Sizhong, QIAN Songting, GAO Weishi, ZHANG Liming. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance during the rapid growth stage of sugar beet cultivars [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2140-2151. |
[5] | ZHANG Fan, CHEN Xiaolu, WANG Jie, HOU Xianfei, JIA Donghai, GU Yuanguo, MIAO Haocui, LI Qiang. Effects of mixed salt stress on seed germination and seedling growth of peanut seed [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2168-2182. |
[6] | LI Jinyao, XU Guiqing, WANG Lisheng, LU Ping, SHI Dongfang, ZHENG Weihua. Study on the effect of N fertilization on drought resistance of Calligonum caput-medusae seedlings [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2330-2340. |
[7] | DONG Zhiduo, XU Fei, FU Qiuping, HUANG Jian, QI Tong, MENG Ajing, FU Yanbo, Kaisaier Kuerban. Effects of different types of salt and alkali stress on cotton seed germination [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1831-1844. |
[8] | XI Rui, CHEN Yijia, LI Ning, YU Qinghui, WANG Qiang, QIN Yong. Effects of exogenous 2, 4-epibrassinolide on seed germination of different salt-sensitive tomatoes under salt stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1983-1992. |
[9] | QIANG Lidong, FENG Kuan, ZHU Changan, ZHAO Yun, LI Zhaofeng, LI Weihua. Effect of high temperature stress at anthesis on seed vigor of wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1345-1351. |
[10] |
WANG Yizhao, YANG Qizhi, LIU Yuxiu, Alayi Nurkamali, Vladimir Shvidchenko, ZHANG Zhengmao.
Evaluation of drought resistance of different spring wheat germplasm introduced from Kazakhstan during seedling stage under 20% PEG stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1352-1360. |
[11] | YANG Junyan, YAN Miao, WU Haibo, YANG Wenli, WANG Haojie, MAO Jiancai, ZHAI Wenqiang, LI Junhua. The impact of high temperature on different thick -skinned melon varieties and comprehensive evaluation of its heat resistance [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1386-1396. |
[12] | ZHANG Guoru, TANG Yaping, SHI Linyuan, YUAN Lei, ZHANG Yong, YANG Shengbao. Genetic properties of interspecific crosses in pepper [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(3): 632-641. |
[13] | ZHOU Xiaoyun, ZHANG Jungao, LIANG Jing, GONG Jingyun, ZHOU Guangwei, ZHANG Shaomin, LEI Bin. Effects of the carboxin from seed coating formulation on the cotton seed germination and seedling agronomic characteristics under water and temperature stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 3051-3060. |
[14] | LIAO Caiyun, MA Gui, ZHOU Yanyan, DING Jiafu, ZHOU Yue, BI Kexin, SUN Rong, LI Youhua. Effects of combined exposure of zinc and different microplastics on seed germination and growth of maize [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(11): 2713-2721. |
[15] | Wang Tianling, Hou Xianfei, Shi Junjie, Sun Quanxi, Jia Donghai, Gu Yuanguo, Shan Shihua, Miao Haocui, Li Qiang. Genetic diversity analysis of 67 creeping peanut germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(1): 42-54. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||