Effects of different planting modes of yellow sand substrate on tomato yield and quality in solar greenhouse

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.04.014

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of sand- substratebag cultivation (BC) and trough cultivation (TC) on tomato yield and quality, and to verify the advantages and effects of different planting modes, aiming to provide technical support for desert and Gobi facility agriculture in Xinjiang. 【Methods】 The tomato varieties under the test were Kardiya 800 and Shijia 1867. This study statistically analyzed the yields of the two tomato varieties under different planting modes, and tested their soluble solid content (SSC), lycopene (LYC) content, vitamin C (VC) content, and sugar-acid ratio. Principal component analysis was applied to comprehensively evaluate the quality of tomatoes grown under different planting modes. 【Results】 There was a significant difference in tomato yields among different planting modes (P<0.01), with an average yield increase of 9.5% in Trough cultivation compared to Sand- substratebag cultivation. Variance analysis of planting modes on tomato quality indicators showed that VC content reached a very significant level (P<0.01), and had a significant impact on Lycopene (P<0.05). Compared to Trough cultivation mode, BC mode had higher VC content and sugar-acid ratio by 22.7% and 15.4% respectively. In contrast, Trough cultivation mode had higher Soluble solid content and Lycopene content by 2.5% and 20.3% respectively compared to BC mode. Principal component analysis was used to comprehensively evaluate the four quality indicators of Soluble solid content, Lycopene, VC content, and sugar-acid ratio in the two tomato varieties under BC and Trough cultivation modes, the scoring order was TC Shijia 1867 > BC Shijia 1867 > BC Kardiya 800 > TC Kardiya 800. 【Conclusion】 The BC mode significantly improves the VC content and sugar-acid ratio of tomatoes, enhances their taste quality and shortens the planting cycle, making it a potential application in the northern Xinjiang region. The Trough cultivation mode was beneficial to increase tomato yield and Lycopene content, the average yield of 2 tomato varieties is 158.3 t/hm², which has reached the higher yield level among the greenhouse tomato with stronger potential for promotion and application in desert and Gobi facility agriculture.

Key words: tomato; yellow sand substrate; planting mode; yield; quality

摘要：

【目的】研究黄沙基质袋式栽培(BC)和槽式栽培(TC)对番茄产量与品质的影响,验证不同栽培方式的优势与效果,为新疆沙漠、戈壁设施农业提供技术支持。【方法】供试番茄品种为卡地亚800和世佳1867,分析2个番茄品种不同栽培方式下的产量,并检测番茄可溶性固形物含量(SSC)、番茄红素(LYC)含量、VC含量和糖酸比,应用主成分分析综合性评价不同栽培方式番茄品质。【结果】番茄不同栽培方式番茄产量呈极显著性的差异(P<0.01),槽式栽培较袋式栽培产量平均高9.5%;不同栽培方式,番茄VC含量达到极显著水平(P<0.01),对番茄红素的影响达到显著水平(P<0.05)。袋式栽培比槽式栽培 VC 含量和糖酸比分别高22.7%和15.4%,槽式栽培对比袋式栽培前者可溶性固形物含量和番茄红素含量分别比后者高2.5%和20.3%。番茄2品种袋式栽培和槽式栽培的可溶性固形物含量、番茄红素、VC含量和糖酸比4个品质指标综合评价,得分顺序为槽式栽培世佳1867> 袋式栽培世佳1867> 袋式栽培卡地亚800> 槽式栽培卡地亚800。【结论】袋式栽培显著提高番茄VC含量,增加糖酸比,改善番茄口感品质,缩短下茬番茄的种植周期,在新疆北疆地区具有应用潜力;槽式栽培有利于增加番茄红素含量,2个番茄品种平均产量为158.3 t/hm²,已达到温室番茄的高产水平,在沙漠、戈壁设施农业上具有推广应用的潜力。

关键词: 番茄, 黄沙基质, 栽培方式, 产量, 品质

CLC Number:

S641.2

MA Ruhai, HUANG Chunyan, CUI Huimei, ZHENG Yuehui, FANG Yuan, WANG Dengwei. Effects of different planting modes of yellow sand substrate on tomato yield and quality in solar greenhouse[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(4): 903-910.

马如海, 黄春燕, 崔辉梅, 郑越辉, 方圆, 王登伟. 黄沙基质不同栽培方式对设施番茄产量与品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(4): 903-910.

Figures/Tables 8

References 24

[1]	杨俊杰, 韩波. 大有开发潜力的西部沙漠农业[J]. 生态经济, 2000,(12): 48-50.
	YANG Junjie, HAN Bo. The great development potential of desert agriculture in western China[J]. Ecological Economy, 2000,(12): 48-50.
[2]	Wanjala, Bramwel W. Srinivasulu. Improving rapid multiplication of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas L. (Lam) pre-basic seed using technology in East Africa[J]. Experimental Agriculture, 2020, 56(3) : 347-354. DOI
[3]	李春雨, 谭占明, 程云霞, 等. 水肥耦合对沙培番茄生长发育及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(9): 2158-2169. DOI
	LI Chunyu, TAN Zhanming, CHENG Yunxia, et al. The influence of water and fertilizer coupling on the growth-development and quality of sand culture tomato[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2158-2169. DOI
[4]	陈亮, 杨世梅, 栾倩倩, 等. 设施黄沙基质栽培对草莓生长及产量品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2021,(19): 61-69.
	CHEN Liang, YANG Shimei, LUAN Qianqian, et al. Effects of yellow sand substrate cultivation on plant growth and yield quality of facility strawberry[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2021,(19): 61-69.
[5]	严宗山, 杨世梅, 张亚萍, 等. 不同黄沙栽培模式对温室番茄生长、产量、光合特性及品质的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2023, 36(12):100-106.
	YAN Zongshan, YANG Shimei, ZHANG Yaping, et al. Effects of different yellow sand cultivation modes on growth, yield, photo-synthetic characteristics and quality of tomato in greenhouse[J]. China Cucurbits and Vegetables, 2023, 36(12):100-106.
[6]	杨世梅, 王世余, 严宗山, 等. 设施条件下不同黄沙栽培模式对番茄生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2021,(13): 25-29.
	YANG Shimei, WANG Shiyu, YAN Zongshan, et al. Effects of different cultivation patterns of yellow sand on growth, yield and quality of tomato in greenhouse[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2021,(13): 25-29.
[7]	姚正毅, 陈广庭, 张伟民. 沙丘表面沙土密度分布特征及其成因[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2003, 30(3): 15-18.
	YAO Zhengyi, Chen Guangting, ZHANG Weimin. The distribution characteristics of sandy soil densities on the dune surface and it’s genesis[J]. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, 2003, 30(3): 15-18.
[8]	吕娜. 设施栽培方式对四个番茄品种产量和品质的影响[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2017.
	LYU Na. Effects of protected cultivation methods on yield and quality of four tomato varieties[D]. Guangzhou: South China Agricultural University, 2017.
[9]	杨雨松, 郑昕雨, 刘杰, 等. 日光温室基质袋培番茄东西垄向栽培模式研究[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2020,(5): 40-47.
	YANG Yusong, ZHENG Xinyu, LIU Jie, et al. Studies on cultivation mode of east-west ridge for tomato cultivation with bags in sliding-cover solar greenhouse[J]. China Vegetables, 2020,(5): 40-47.
[10]	崔天宇, 卢中领, 薛琳, 等. 基于近红外反射光谱的番茄糖分快速检测模型研究[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2023, 43(4): 1218-1224.
	CUI Tianyu, LU Zhongling, XUE Lin, et al. Research on the rapid detection model of tomato sugar based onNear-infrared reflectance spectroscopy[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2023, 43(4): 1218-1224.
[11]	王雅芳, 王登伟, 黄春燕, 等. 黄沙基质设施大棚辣椒高产栽培技术[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2015, 38(1): 13-15.
	WANG Yafang, WANG Dengwei, HUANG Chunyan, et al. High yield cultivation techniques for chili pepper in yellow sand substrate facility greenhouse[J]. Xinjiang Farm Research of Science and Technology, 2015, 38(1): 13-15.
[12]	田春雨, 刘野. 番茄风味品质性状遗传研究进展[J]. 农业科技与装备, 2009,(3): 4-5.
	TIAN Chunyu, LIU Ye. Study on the heredity of tomato’s flavor, quality and trait[J]. Agricultural Science & Technology and Equipment, 2009,(3): 4-5.
[13]	孟鑫, 吕剑, 罗石磊, 等. 不同营养液浓度对日光温室番茄果实品质的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2021,(10): 85-90.
	MENG Xin, LYU Jian, LUO Shilei, et al. Effects of different nutrient solution concentrations on tomato fruit quality in solar greenhouse[J]. China Vegetables, 2021,(10): 85-90.
[14]	罗颖. 番茄可溶性固形物含量与相关生理生化指标关系研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2010.
	LUO Ying. Study on the relationship between soluble solid content and related physiological and biochemical indexes of tomato[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2010.
[15]	王亚萍, 李仪曼, 黄代峰, 等. 栽培方式和根系空间大小对日光温室番茄产量和品质的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(23): 37-39.
	WANG Yaping, LI Yiman, HUANG Daifeng, et al. Effects of cultivation methods and root space on yield and quality of tomato in solar greenhouse[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 49(23): 37-39.
[16]	刘聪聪, 黄春燕, 王登伟. 黄沙基质水肥一体化对番茄产量与品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(12): 2250-2259. DOI
	LIU Congcong, HUANG Chunyan, WANG Dengwei. Effects of water and fertilizer integration on yield and quality of tomato planting in yellow sand substrate[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(12): 2250-2259. DOI
[17]	梁梅, 周蓉, 邹滔, 等. 番茄农艺性状与果实主要营养成分相关性分析[J]. 西北农业学报, 2013, 22(5): 91-100.
	LIANG Mei, ZHOU Rong, ZOU Tao, et al. Analysis of correlation between main nutritional compositions and agronomic traits in tomato[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2013, 22(5): 91-100.
[18]	周秀利. 日光温室番茄椰糠基质栽培模式研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2017.
	ZHOU Xiuli. Study on cultivation mode of tomato coconut bran substrate in solar greenhouse[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2017.
[19]	朱强. 鲜食番茄口感和特征风味客观评价方法的研究[D]. 青岛: 青岛农业大学, 2018.
	ZHU Qiang. Study on objective evaluation method of taste and characteristic flavor of fresh tomato[D]. Qingdao: Qingdao Agricultural University, 2018.
[20]	何亚飞. 不同栽培模式对封闭式无机基质槽培番茄生长发育的影响[D]. 邯郸: 河北工程大学, 2017.
	HE Yafei. Effects of different cultivation patterns on the growth and development of tomato in closed inorganic substrate trough culture[D]. Handan: Hebei University of Engineering, 2017.
[21]	马洪英, 靳力争, 李响, 等. 不同基质栽培模式对温室番茄生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 天津农业科学, 2016, 22(11): 130-132.
	MA Hongying, JIN Lizheng, LI Xiang, et al. Effects of different grown substrate culture on the growth, yield and quality of tomato in greenhouse[J]. Tianjin Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 22(11): 130-132.
[22]	李佳, 黄灵丹, 张丽娟, 等. 不同基质栽培对温室番茄生长、品质和产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(5): 1046-1049. DOI
	LI Jia, HUANG Lingdan, ZHANG Lijuan, et al. The effects of different substrate cultivation on the growth, quality and yield greenhouse tomatoes[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 64(5): 1046-1049.
[23]	唐欣悦, 阿西木·吾舒尔, 王磊, 等. 限根栽培对杂交番茄‘松田粉玉’和‘松田粉娜’产量品质的影响[J]. 天津农业科学, 2023, 29(2): 20-26.
	TANG Xinyue, Aximu Wushuer, WANG Lei, et al. Effects of root restriction cultivation on yield and quality of hybrid tomato’Songtianfenyu’ and’Songtianfenna’[J]. Tianjin Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 29(2): 20-26.
[24]	冯锡鸿, 王彦刚, 冯汝龙, 等. 温室不同栽培方式对番茄生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2023, 64(9): 30-32, 44.
	FENG Xihong, WANG Yangang, FENG Rulong, et al. Effect of different cultivation methods in greenhouse on tomato growth, yield and quality[J]. Journal of Ningxia Agriculture and Forestry Science and Technology, 2023, 64(9): 30-32, 44.

变异来源 Origin of variance	自由度 Df	平方和 Sum of squares	均方 Equal squares	F 值 F-value	显著水平 Significance level
区组Granule	2	6.7	3.4	0.37	0.704 3
品种Variety	1	8 232	8 232	1 080.7	8.00e-10 ^**
栽培方式 Planting mode	1	722	722	79.9	0.000 1^**
品种×栽培方式 Variety by planting mode	1	83.7	83.7	10.9	0.0106^*
误差Residuals	8	61	8

变异来源 Origin of variance	自由度 Df	平方和 Sum of squares	均方 Equal squares	F 值 F-value	显著水平 Significance level
区组Granule	2	6.7	3.4	0.37	0.704 3
品种Variety	1	8 232	8 232	1 080.7	8.00e-10 ^**
栽培方式 Planting mode	1	722	722	79.9	0.000 1^**
品种×栽培方式 Variety by planting mode	1	83.7	83.7	10.9	0.0106^*
误差Residuals	8	61	8

变异来源 Origin of variance	品质指标 Qulity indice	自由度 Df	平方和 Sum of squares	均方 Equal squares	F 值 F-value	显著水平 Significance level
品种 Variety	可溶性固形物含量(%)	1	0.226 9	0.226 9	26.288	0.000 9^**
	番茄红素(mg/100g)		36.750	36.750	45.938	0.043 9^*
	VC(mg/100g)		10.641	10.641	15.717	0.004 2^**
	糖酸比		8.67	8.670	2.471	0.155
栽培方式 Planting modes	可溶性固形物含量(%)	1	0.029 0	0.029 0	3.354 0	0.104 4
	番茄红素(mg/100g)		4.560 0	4.560 0	5.704 0	0.043 9^*
	VC (mg/100g)		25.521	25.521	37.669	0.000 3^**
	糖酸比		5.88	5.880	1.676	0.232
品种×栽培方式 Variety×planting modes	可溶性固形物含量(%)	1	0.066 0	0.066 0	7.631 0	0.024 6^*
	番茄红素(mg/100g)		0.080 0	0.080 0	0.104 0	0.755 2
	VC (mg/100g)		2.167 0	2.167 0	3.199 0	0.111 5
	糖酸比		13.65	13.653	3.891
误差 Residuals	可溶性固形物含量(%)	8	0.069 2	0.008 7	0.084
	番茄红素(mg/100g)		6.400 0	0.800 0
	VC (mg/100g)		5.420 0	0.677 0
	糖酸比		28.07	3.509

变异来源 Origin of variance	品质指标 Qulity indice	自由度 Df	平方和 Sum of squares	均方 Equal squares	F 值 F-value	显著水平 Significance level
品种 Variety	可溶性固形物含量(%)	1	0.226 9	0.226 9	26.288	0.000 9^**
	番茄红素(mg/100g)		36.750	36.750	45.938	0.043 9^*
	VC(mg/100g)		10.641	10.641	15.717	0.004 2^**
	糖酸比		8.67	8.670	2.471	0.155
栽培方式 Planting modes	可溶性固形物含量(%)	1	0.029 0	0.029 0	3.354 0	0.104 4
	番茄红素(mg/100g)		4.560 0	4.560 0	5.704 0	0.043 9^*
	VC (mg/100g)		25.521	25.521	37.669	0.000 3^**
	糖酸比		5.88	5.880	1.676	0.232
品种×栽培方式 Variety×planting modes	可溶性固形物含量(%)	1	0.066 0	0.066 0	7.631 0	0.024 6^*
	番茄红素(mg/100g)		0.080 0	0.080 0	0.104 0	0.755 2
	VC (mg/100g)		2.167 0	2.167 0	3.199 0	0.111 5
	糖酸比		13.65	13.653	3.891
误差 Residuals	可溶性固形物含量(%)	8	0.069 2	0.008 7	0.084
	番茄红素(mg/100g)		6.400 0	0.800 0
	VC (mg/100g)		5.420 0	0.677 0
	糖酸比		28.07	3.509

主成分 Principal component	特征值 Eigenvalue	贡献率 Contribution rate(%)	累积贡献率 Accumulate contribution rate(%)
1	2.472 9	61.82	61.82
2	1.167 3	29.18	91.01
3	0.220 8	0.055 2	0.965 3
4	0.138 9	0.034 7	1.000 0