Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (7): 1574-1581.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.07.002
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Germplasm Resources·Molecular Genetics·Cultivation Physiology·Physiology and Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Huijie1(), WANG Junhao2, GONG Zhaolong2, LIANG Yajun2, WANG Junduo2, LI Xueyuan2, ZHENG Juyun2(
), WANG Jichuan1(
)
Received:
2023-10-27
Online:
2024-07-20
Published:
2024-09-04
Correspondence author:
ZHENG Juyun, WANG Jichuan
Supported by:
刘慧杰1(), 王俊豪2, 龚照龙2, 梁亚军2, 王俊铎2, 李雪源2, 郑巨云2(
), 王冀川1(
)
通讯作者:
郑巨云,王冀川
作者简介:
刘慧杰(1998-),女,山东人,硕士研究生,研究方向作物遗传育种,(E-mail)1305967899@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
LIU Huijie, WANG Junhao, GONG Zhaolong, LIANG Yajun, WANG Junduo, LI Xueyuan, ZHENG Juyun, WANG Jichuan. Identification of salt tolerance of 197 upland cotton varieties at germination stage[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1574-1581.
刘慧杰, 王俊豪, 龚照龙, 梁亚军, 王俊铎, 李雪源, 郑巨云, 王冀川. 197份陆地棉品种萌发期耐盐性鉴定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1574-1581.
性状 Traits | 最大值 Max | 最小值 Min | 均值 Average | 标准差 SD | 变异系数 CV(%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 Control group | 发芽势GP(%) | 1.350 | 0.233 | 0.820 | 0.181 | 22.098 |
发芽率GR(%) | 1.450 | 0.467 | 0.933 | 0.105 | 11.238 | |
根长RL(cm) | 23.729 | 6.038 | 15.102 | 3.655 | 24.205 | |
盐胁迫 Salt stress treatment | 发芽势GP(%) | 1.050 | 0.000 | 0.402 | 0.267 | 66.553 |
发芽率GR(%) | 1.100 | 0.067 | 0.561 | 0.270 | 48.092 | |
根长RL(cm) | 9.167 | 0.800 | 2.797 | 1.903 | 68.042 |
Tab.1 Phenotypic traits of 197 upland cotton germplasm resources under salt stress
性状 Traits | 最大值 Max | 最小值 Min | 均值 Average | 标准差 SD | 变异系数 CV(%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 Control group | 发芽势GP(%) | 1.350 | 0.233 | 0.820 | 0.181 | 22.098 |
发芽率GR(%) | 1.450 | 0.467 | 0.933 | 0.105 | 11.238 | |
根长RL(cm) | 23.729 | 6.038 | 15.102 | 3.655 | 24.205 | |
盐胁迫 Salt stress treatment | 发芽势GP(%) | 1.050 | 0.000 | 0.402 | 0.267 | 66.553 |
发芽率GR(%) | 1.100 | 0.067 | 0.561 | 0.270 | 48.092 | |
根长RL(cm) | 9.167 | 0.800 | 2.797 | 1.903 | 68.042 |
性状 Traits | 最大值 Max | 最小值 Min | 均值 Average | 标准差 SD | 变异系数 CV(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
相对发芽势 RGP(%) | 1.529 | 0.000 | 0.486 | 0.310 | 63.746 |
相对发芽率 RGR(%) | 1.174 | 0.067 | 0.597 | 0.278 | 46.609 |
相对根长 RRL(%) | 0.743 | 0.049 | 0.184 | 0.119 | 64.278 |
Tab.2 Relative value of each trait at germination stage
性状 Traits | 最大值 Max | 最小值 Min | 均值 Average | 标准差 SD | 变异系数 CV(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
相对发芽势 RGP(%) | 1.529 | 0.000 | 0.486 | 0.310 | 63.746 |
相对发芽率 RGR(%) | 1.174 | 0.067 | 0.597 | 0.278 | 46.609 |
相对根长 RRL(%) | 0.743 | 0.049 | 0.184 | 0.119 | 64.278 |
性状 Traits | 相对发芽势 GP(%) | 相对发芽率 GR(%) | 相对根长 RRL(%) |
---|---|---|---|
相对发芽势RGP(%) | 1 | 0.817** | 0.506** |
相对发芽率RGR(%) | 0.817** | 1 | 0.545** |
相对根长RRL(%) | 0.506** | 0.545** | 1 |
Tab.3 Correlation analysis of relative values of 197 upland cotton varieties resources
性状 Traits | 相对发芽势 GP(%) | 相对发芽率 GR(%) | 相对根长 RRL(%) |
---|---|---|---|
相对发芽势RGP(%) | 1 | 0.817** | 0.506** |
相对发芽率RGR(%) | 0.817** | 1 | 0.545** |
相对根长RRL(%) | 0.506** | 0.545** | 1 |
综合评价D值 Comprehensive evaluation of D value | 耐盐性 Salt tolerence | 等级 Solt-tolerence index |
---|---|---|
0.7<D ≤1.0 | 高耐盐 | 1 |
0.5<D≤0.7 | 耐盐 | 2 |
0.3<D ≤0.5 | 中耐盐 | 3 |
0<D ≤0.3 | 敏盐 | 4 |
Tab.4 Salt tolerance criteria of upland cotton
综合评价D值 Comprehensive evaluation of D value | 耐盐性 Salt tolerence | 等级 Solt-tolerence index |
---|---|---|
0.7<D ≤1.0 | 高耐盐 | 1 |
0.5<D≤0.7 | 耐盐 | 2 |
0.3<D ≤0.5 | 中耐盐 | 3 |
0<D ≤0.3 | 敏盐 | 4 |
因子 Factor | 初始特征值 Initial eigenvalue | ||
---|---|---|---|
特征值 Eigenvalue | 贡献率Contribution (%) | 累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution(%) | |
1 | 3.256 | 81.388 | 81.388 |
2 | 0.563 | 14.077 | 95.466 |
3 | 0.181 | 4.534 | 100 |
4 | -6.34E-17 | -1.58E-15 | 100 |
Tab.5 Comparison of principal components of upland cotton under salt stress
因子 Factor | 初始特征值 Initial eigenvalue | ||
---|---|---|---|
特征值 Eigenvalue | 贡献率Contribution (%) | 累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution(%) | |
1 | 3.256 | 81.388 | 81.388 |
2 | 0.563 | 14.077 | 95.466 |
3 | 0.181 | 4.534 | 100 |
4 | -6.34E-17 | -1.58E-15 | 100 |
性状Traits | 因子1 Factor 1 |
---|---|
相对发芽势RGP(%) | 0.909 |
相对发芽率RGR(%) | 0.927 |
相对根长RRL(%) | 0.755 |
综合评价D值D-value | 1 |
贡献率Contribution(%) | 81.388 |
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution(%) | 95.466 |
Tab.6 Composite factor score
性状Traits | 因子1 Factor 1 |
---|---|
相对发芽势RGP(%) | 0.909 |
相对发芽率RGR(%) | 0.927 |
相对根长RRL(%) | 0.755 |
综合评价D值D-value | 1 |
贡献率Contribution(%) | 81.388 |
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution(%) | 95.466 |
棉区 Cotton areas | 高耐 High salt | 耐盐 Salt | 中耐 Medium salt | 敏盐 Sensitivity salt | 总计 Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
国内Domestic | 西北内陆棉区 | 4 | 23 | 23 | 42 | 92 |
黄河流域棉区 | 0 | 9 | 23 | 18 | 50 | |
长江流域棉区 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 17 | 27 | |
辽宁特早熟棉区 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | |
国外Overseas | 0 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 22 | |
总计Total | 4 | 39 | 65 | 89 | 197 |
Tab.7 Comparison of salt tolerance of cotton varities resources accessions from different origins
棉区 Cotton areas | 高耐 High salt | 耐盐 Salt | 中耐 Medium salt | 敏盐 Sensitivity salt | 总计 Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
国内Domestic | 西北内陆棉区 | 4 | 23 | 23 | 42 | 92 |
黄河流域棉区 | 0 | 9 | 23 | 18 | 50 | |
长江流域棉区 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 17 | 27 | |
辽宁特早熟棉区 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | |
国外Overseas | 0 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 22 | |
总计Total | 4 | 39 | 65 | 89 | 197 |
编号 Number | 品种 Varieties | 发芽势GP(%) | 发芽率GR(%) | 根长RL(cm) | 综合评价 D值 D-value | 耐盐性 | 来源 Origin | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
相对值 | 隶属 函数值 | 相对值 | 隶属 函数值 | 相对值 | 隶属 函数值 | |||||
1 | 20N705 | 0.700 | 1.000 | 1.174 | 1.000 | 0.516 | 0.673 | 0.897 | 高耐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
2 | C6524 | 0.767 | 0.981 | 1.167 | 0.993 | 0.282 | 0.336 | 0.783 | 高耐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
3 | 新陆早17号 | 0.800 | 0.588 | 0.852 | 0.709 | 0.664 | 0.886 | 0.723 | 高耐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
4 | 新陆202号 | 0.533 | 0.701 | 1.000 | 0.843 | 0.459 | 0.592 | 0.715 | 高耐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
5 | 新陆中38号 | 0.933 | 0.817 | 0.739 | 0.607 | 0.508 | 0.662 | 0.698 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
6 | 新陆中48号 | 0.533 | 0.602 | 0.966 | 0.812 | 0.485 | 0.629 | 0.681 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
7 | 新陆早57号 | 0.533 | 0.629 | 0.966 | 0.812 | 0.424 | 0.542 | 0.663 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
8 | 新陆201 | 0.700 | 0.498 | 0.917 | 0.768 | 0.524 | 0.685 | 0.648 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
9 | 20N699 | 0.900 | 0.654 | 1.000 | 0.843 | 0.344 | 0.425 | 0.646 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
10 | 鲁9 | 0.700 | 0.628 | 1.080 | 0.915 | 0.271 | 0.320 | 0.628 | 耐盐 | 中国黄河流域棉区 |
11 | C-3174 | 0.600 | 0.578 | 0.933 | 0.783 | 0.407 | 0.516 | 0.628 | 耐盐 | 前苏联 |
12 | 新陆中71号 | 0.633 | 0.537 | 1.000 | 0.843 | 0.389 | 0.491 | 0.626 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
13 | 20N698 | 0.867 | 0.679 | 0.897 | 0.750 | 0.346 | 0.429 | 0.624 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
14 | 20N703 | 0.700 | 0.535 | 1.000 | 0.843 | 0.373 | 0.467 | 0.618 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
15 | FL12012 | 0.800 | 0.569 | 1.040 | 0.879 | 0.309 | 0.375 | 0.613 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
16 | 达棉20 | 0.833 | 0.687 | 1.000 | 0.843 | 0.217 | 0.243 | 0.600 | 耐盐 | 中国黄河流域棉区 |
17 | 17N11 | 0.933 | 0.631 | 0.967 | 0.813 | 0.280 | 0.334 | 0.599 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
18 | 晋棉19 | 0.367 | 0.654 | 0.933 | 0.783 | 0.283 | 0.338 | 0.598 | 耐盐 | 中国黄河流域棉区 |
19 | 17N12 | 0.800 | 0.630 | 1.000 | 0.843 | 0.255 | 0.297 | 0.598 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
20 | 银棉1号 | 0.900 | 0.192 | 0.760 | 0.626 | 0.743 | 1.000 | 0.593 | 耐盐 | 中国黄河流域棉区 |
21 | 3Z-125-44 | 1.000 | 0.713 | 0.897 | 0.750 | 0.237 | 0.271 | 0.587 | 耐盐 | 中国黄河流域棉区 |
22 | 18X326 | 0.733 | 0.483 | 0.808 | 0.669 | 0.447 | 0.573 | 0.574 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
23 | 17N2 | 0.933 | 0.545 | 0.933 | 0.783 | 0.304 | 0.368 | 0.570 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
24 | 20N701 | 0.633 | 0.584 | 0.967 | 0.813 | 0.248 | 0.288 | 0.568 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
25 | 20N702 | 0.733 | 0.575 | 0.966 | 0.812 | 0.236 | 0.270 | 0.559 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
26 | 鲁棉研21 | 0.933 | 0.505 | 0.840 | 0.698 | 0.367 | 0.458 | 0.556 | 耐盐 | 中国黄河流域棉区 |
27 | 3Z-R15-28 | 0.667 | 0.505 | 0.828 | 0.687 | 0.374 | 0.469 | 0.555 | 耐盐 | 中国黄河流域棉区 |
28 | 鄂棉21 | 0.733 | 0.578 | 1.000 | 0.843 | 0.189 | 0.202 | 0.550 | 耐盐 | 中国长江流域棉区 |
29 | KK-351 | 0.567 | 0.473 | 0.897 | 0.750 | 0.338 | 0.417 | 0.549 | 耐盐 | 前苏联 |
30 | 新陆早33号 | 0.100 | 0.473 | 0.800 | 0.662 | 0.401 | 0.508 | 0.548 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
31 | 徐州142 | 0.133 | 0.471 | 0.966 | 0.812 | 0.277 | 0.329 | 0.542 | 耐盐 | 中国长江流域棉区 |
32 | 辽7334-7728 | 0.267 | 0.632 | 0.967 | 0.813 | 0.150 | 0.146 | 0.541 | 耐盐 | 中国辽宁特早熟棉区 |
33 | 150030 | 0.567 | 0.514 | 0.900 | 0.753 | 0.274 | 0.324 | 0.535 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
34 | 新陆中62号 | 0.267 | 0.377 | 0.815 | 0.676 | 0.425 | 0.542 | 0.530 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
35 | 3TH-R15-146 | 0.767 | 0.553 | 0.800 | 0.662 | 0.297 | 0.357 | 0.529 | 耐盐 | 中国黄河流域棉区 |
36 | 65-201 | 0.733 | 0.557 | 0.964 | 0.811 | 0.177 | 0.185 | 0.526 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
37 | 新陆早55号 | 0.267 | 0.519 | 0.900 | 0.753 | 0.246 | 0.285 | 0.524 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
38 | 新陆早12号 | 0.367 | 0.565 | 0.750 | 0.617 | 0.307 | 0.372 | 0.522 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
39 | 鄂抗棉33 | 0.333 | 0.490 | 1.000 | 0.843 | 0.193 | 0.208 | 0.521 | 耐盐 | 中国长江流域棉区 |
40 | 3Z-R15-24 | 0.433 | 0.484 | 0.967 | 0.813 | 0.218 | 0.243 | 0.520 | 耐盐 | 中国黄河流域棉区 |
41 | 8024抗 | 0.800 | 0.560 | 0.800 | 0.662 | 0.253 | 0.294 | 0.511 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
42 | 新陆中40号 | 0.200 | 0.453 | 0.690 | 0.563 | 0.403 | 0.511 | 0.508 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
43 | 泗棉2号 | 0.567 | 0.503 | 1.000 | 0.843 | 0.143 | 0.136 | 0.503 | 耐盐 | 中国长江流域棉区 |
Tab.8 Comprehensive evaluation of some salt-tolerant upland cotton varieties
编号 Number | 品种 Varieties | 发芽势GP(%) | 发芽率GR(%) | 根长RL(cm) | 综合评价 D值 D-value | 耐盐性 | 来源 Origin | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
相对值 | 隶属 函数值 | 相对值 | 隶属 函数值 | 相对值 | 隶属 函数值 | |||||
1 | 20N705 | 0.700 | 1.000 | 1.174 | 1.000 | 0.516 | 0.673 | 0.897 | 高耐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
2 | C6524 | 0.767 | 0.981 | 1.167 | 0.993 | 0.282 | 0.336 | 0.783 | 高耐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
3 | 新陆早17号 | 0.800 | 0.588 | 0.852 | 0.709 | 0.664 | 0.886 | 0.723 | 高耐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
4 | 新陆202号 | 0.533 | 0.701 | 1.000 | 0.843 | 0.459 | 0.592 | 0.715 | 高耐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
5 | 新陆中38号 | 0.933 | 0.817 | 0.739 | 0.607 | 0.508 | 0.662 | 0.698 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
6 | 新陆中48号 | 0.533 | 0.602 | 0.966 | 0.812 | 0.485 | 0.629 | 0.681 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
7 | 新陆早57号 | 0.533 | 0.629 | 0.966 | 0.812 | 0.424 | 0.542 | 0.663 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
8 | 新陆201 | 0.700 | 0.498 | 0.917 | 0.768 | 0.524 | 0.685 | 0.648 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
9 | 20N699 | 0.900 | 0.654 | 1.000 | 0.843 | 0.344 | 0.425 | 0.646 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
10 | 鲁9 | 0.700 | 0.628 | 1.080 | 0.915 | 0.271 | 0.320 | 0.628 | 耐盐 | 中国黄河流域棉区 |
11 | C-3174 | 0.600 | 0.578 | 0.933 | 0.783 | 0.407 | 0.516 | 0.628 | 耐盐 | 前苏联 |
12 | 新陆中71号 | 0.633 | 0.537 | 1.000 | 0.843 | 0.389 | 0.491 | 0.626 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
13 | 20N698 | 0.867 | 0.679 | 0.897 | 0.750 | 0.346 | 0.429 | 0.624 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
14 | 20N703 | 0.700 | 0.535 | 1.000 | 0.843 | 0.373 | 0.467 | 0.618 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
15 | FL12012 | 0.800 | 0.569 | 1.040 | 0.879 | 0.309 | 0.375 | 0.613 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
16 | 达棉20 | 0.833 | 0.687 | 1.000 | 0.843 | 0.217 | 0.243 | 0.600 | 耐盐 | 中国黄河流域棉区 |
17 | 17N11 | 0.933 | 0.631 | 0.967 | 0.813 | 0.280 | 0.334 | 0.599 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
18 | 晋棉19 | 0.367 | 0.654 | 0.933 | 0.783 | 0.283 | 0.338 | 0.598 | 耐盐 | 中国黄河流域棉区 |
19 | 17N12 | 0.800 | 0.630 | 1.000 | 0.843 | 0.255 | 0.297 | 0.598 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
20 | 银棉1号 | 0.900 | 0.192 | 0.760 | 0.626 | 0.743 | 1.000 | 0.593 | 耐盐 | 中国黄河流域棉区 |
21 | 3Z-125-44 | 1.000 | 0.713 | 0.897 | 0.750 | 0.237 | 0.271 | 0.587 | 耐盐 | 中国黄河流域棉区 |
22 | 18X326 | 0.733 | 0.483 | 0.808 | 0.669 | 0.447 | 0.573 | 0.574 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
23 | 17N2 | 0.933 | 0.545 | 0.933 | 0.783 | 0.304 | 0.368 | 0.570 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
24 | 20N701 | 0.633 | 0.584 | 0.967 | 0.813 | 0.248 | 0.288 | 0.568 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
25 | 20N702 | 0.733 | 0.575 | 0.966 | 0.812 | 0.236 | 0.270 | 0.559 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
26 | 鲁棉研21 | 0.933 | 0.505 | 0.840 | 0.698 | 0.367 | 0.458 | 0.556 | 耐盐 | 中国黄河流域棉区 |
27 | 3Z-R15-28 | 0.667 | 0.505 | 0.828 | 0.687 | 0.374 | 0.469 | 0.555 | 耐盐 | 中国黄河流域棉区 |
28 | 鄂棉21 | 0.733 | 0.578 | 1.000 | 0.843 | 0.189 | 0.202 | 0.550 | 耐盐 | 中国长江流域棉区 |
29 | KK-351 | 0.567 | 0.473 | 0.897 | 0.750 | 0.338 | 0.417 | 0.549 | 耐盐 | 前苏联 |
30 | 新陆早33号 | 0.100 | 0.473 | 0.800 | 0.662 | 0.401 | 0.508 | 0.548 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
31 | 徐州142 | 0.133 | 0.471 | 0.966 | 0.812 | 0.277 | 0.329 | 0.542 | 耐盐 | 中国长江流域棉区 |
32 | 辽7334-7728 | 0.267 | 0.632 | 0.967 | 0.813 | 0.150 | 0.146 | 0.541 | 耐盐 | 中国辽宁特早熟棉区 |
33 | 150030 | 0.567 | 0.514 | 0.900 | 0.753 | 0.274 | 0.324 | 0.535 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
34 | 新陆中62号 | 0.267 | 0.377 | 0.815 | 0.676 | 0.425 | 0.542 | 0.530 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
35 | 3TH-R15-146 | 0.767 | 0.553 | 0.800 | 0.662 | 0.297 | 0.357 | 0.529 | 耐盐 | 中国黄河流域棉区 |
36 | 65-201 | 0.733 | 0.557 | 0.964 | 0.811 | 0.177 | 0.185 | 0.526 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
37 | 新陆早55号 | 0.267 | 0.519 | 0.900 | 0.753 | 0.246 | 0.285 | 0.524 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
38 | 新陆早12号 | 0.367 | 0.565 | 0.750 | 0.617 | 0.307 | 0.372 | 0.522 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
39 | 鄂抗棉33 | 0.333 | 0.490 | 1.000 | 0.843 | 0.193 | 0.208 | 0.521 | 耐盐 | 中国长江流域棉区 |
40 | 3Z-R15-24 | 0.433 | 0.484 | 0.967 | 0.813 | 0.218 | 0.243 | 0.520 | 耐盐 | 中国黄河流域棉区 |
41 | 8024抗 | 0.800 | 0.560 | 0.800 | 0.662 | 0.253 | 0.294 | 0.511 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
42 | 新陆中40号 | 0.200 | 0.453 | 0.690 | 0.563 | 0.403 | 0.511 | 0.508 | 耐盐 | 中国西北内陆棉区 |
43 | 泗棉2号 | 0.567 | 0.503 | 1.000 | 0.843 | 0.143 | 0.136 | 0.503 | 耐盐 | 中国长江流域棉区 |
[1] | 国家统计局. 国家统计局关于 2022 年棉花产量的公告[EB/OL].(2022-12-26)[2022-12-30]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/xxgk/sjfb/zxfb2020/202212/t20221227_1891259.html. |
[2] | 朱生堡, 乌尔古丽·托尔逊, 唐光木, 等. 新疆盐碱地变化及其治理措施研究进展[J]. 山东农业科学, 2023, 55(3):158-165. |
ZHU Shengbao, Wuerguli Tuoerxun, Tang Guangmu, et al. Research Progress on Saline-Alkali Land Changes and Its Treatment Measures in Xinjiang[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 55(3):158-165. | |
[3] | 王俊铎, 黎玉华, 龚照龙, 等. 棉花耐盐性研究进展[J]. 棉花科学, 2021, 43(5):3-10. |
WANG Junduo, LI Yuhua, GONG Zhaolong, et al. Research Progresses on Salt Tolerence of Cotton[J]. Cotton Science, 2021, 43(5):3-10. | |
[4] | 孙小芳, 郑青松, 刘友良. 盐胁迫下不同基因型棉花萌发生长和离子吸收特性[J]. 棉花学报, 2001,(3):134-137. |
SUN Xiaofang, ZHENG Qingsong, LIU Youliang. Characteristics of Growth and Ion Absorbability in Different Geno types of Cotton at Germinating and Seedling Stages under Salt Stresses[J]. Cotton Science, 2001,(3):134-137. | |
[5] | Zahra M, Tahira L, Sahar N, et al. An overview of salinity stress, mechanism of salinity tolerance and strategies for its management in cotton#13[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2022,13 |
[6] | 陈莹, 王萌, 王晓禹. 棉花种子耐盐碱能力快速筛选研究[J]. 中国种业, 2022,(9):64-70. |
Chen Ying, Wang Meng, Wang Xiaoyu, et al. Rapid screening study on saline-alkali tolerance of cotton seeds[J]. China's seed industry, 2022,(9):64-70. | |
[7] | 张国伟, 路海玲, 张雷, 等. 棉花萌发期和苗期耐盐性评价及耐盐指标筛选[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(8):2045-2053. |
Zhang Guowei, Lu Hailing, Zhang Lei, etc. Salt tolerance evaluation and salt tolerance index screening of cotton at germination stage and seedling stage[J]. Application Ecology, 2011, 22(8): 2045-2053. | |
[8] | 杜磊, 雄东毕, 李成奇, 等. 盐胁迫下黄河流域棉花品种主要性状的通径分析及优异种质筛选[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(14):101-108. |
DU Lei, XIONG Dongbi, LI Chengqi, et al. Path Analysis of Main Traits and Superior Germplasm Screening of Cotton Cultivars in Yellow River Region Under Salt Stress[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 51(14):101-108. | |
[9] | 王俊铎, 曾辉, 龚照龙, 等. 陆地棉品种资源耐复合盐碱性综合评价分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(10):1-11. |
Wang Junduo, Zeng Hui, Gong Zhaolong, et al. Comprehensive Assessment of Complex Salt-alkali Tolerance of the Upland Cotton Varities Resources[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(10):1-11. | |
[10] | 陈雪梅, 刘骅峻, 杨曌, 等. 盐碱胁迫对苜蓿种子萌发性状的影响及耐盐碱性评价[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2024,(3):64-70. |
CHEN XUEmei, LIU Huajun, YANG Zhao, et al. Effects of saline-alkali stress on germination traits of alfalfa seeds and evaluation of saline-alkali tolerance[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024,(3):64-70. | |
[11] | 郑巨云, 曾辉, 王俊铎, 等. 陆地棉品种资源萌发期耐盐性的隶属函数法评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(9):1579-1592. |
ZHENG Juyun, ZENG Hui, WANG Junduo, et al. Comprehensive Assessment of Salt Tolerance of the Upland Cotton Varities Resources in Seedling Stage by Membership Function Method[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(9):1579-1592. | |
[12] | 姜瑛, 周萌, 吴越, 等. 不同燕麦品种耐盐性差异及其生理机制[J]. 草业科学, 2018, 35(12):2903-2914. |
JIANG Ying, ZHOU Meng, WU Yue, et al. Evaluation of Salt Tolerance and Its Underlying Physiological Mechanisms in Different Oats[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(12):2903-2914. | |
[13] | 徐佳陵, 曾文官, 袁延超, 等. 陆地棉种质资源萌发出苗期耐盐性鉴定[J]. 山东农业科学, 2017, 49(9):32-36. |
XU Jialing, ZENG Wenguan, YUAN Yanchao, et al. Salt Tolerance Evaluation at Germination Stage of Upland Cotton Germplasms[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 49(9):32-36. | |
[14] | 白灯莎·买买提艾力, 李寒暝, 张少民, 等. 不同棉花品种种子萌发阶段耐盐性综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2011, 48(1):18-24. |
Baidengsha·Maimaitiaili, Li Hanming, Zhang Shaomin, et al. Assesment on the Salt Resistance of Seven Cotton Varieties (Gossypium hirsutum L.) During Germination Stage[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 48(1):18-24. | |
[15] | 余如刚, 王雪茄, 王国良, 等. 紫花苜蓿品种苗期耐盐性分析及评价指标筛选[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(7):1781-1789. |
YU Rugang, WANG Xuejia, WANG Guoliang, et al. Analysis of Salinity-Tolerance and Screening Evaluation Indicators to Salinity-Tolerance in Medicago Sativa Seedlings[J]. Journal of Grassland Science, 2022, 30(7):1781-1789. | |
[16] | 何进尚, 冯伟东, 刘旺清, 等. NaCl胁迫对小麦种子发芽率的影响及耐盐性分析[J]. 寒旱农业科学, 2023, 2(3):229-233. |
HE JinShang, FENG Weidong, LIU Wangqing, et al. Effects of NaCl Stress on Seed Germination Rate of Wheat Varieties and Their Salt Tolerance Evaluation[J]. Journal of Cold-Arid Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 2(3):229-233. | |
[17] | 王朋, 郑凯, 赵杰银, 等. 陆地棉种质资源材料的耐热性评价及指标筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9):2081-2090. |
WANG Peng, ZHENG Kai, ZHAO Jieyin, et al. Evaluation and index screening of heat resistance of Gossypium hirsutum germplasm resources[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9):2081-2090. | |
[18] | 李双男, 郭慧娟, 王晶, 等. 不同盐碱胁迫对棉花种子萌发的影响[J]. 种子, 2018, 37(1):38-45. |
LI Shuangnan, GUO Huijuan, WANG Jing, et al. Effects of Different Saline and stress on seed[J]. Seed, 2018, 37(1):38-45. | |
[19] | 马洪雨. 高低耐盐性大豆幼苗根叶和黄麻幼苗根响应盐胁迫的蛋白质组学研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2015. |
MA Hongyu. Proteomic analysis of roots and leaves from soybean seedlings and roots from kenaf seedlings with different salt tolerance under salt stress[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2015. | |
[20] | 宋冰梅, 姜岩, 陈鑫, 等. 新型转基因高产棉花萌发期和苗期耐盐性与耐碱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9):2239-2247. |
SONG Bingmei, JIANG Yan, CHEN Xin, et al. Evaluation of salt tolerance and alkali tolerance of new transgenic high-yield cotton at germination stage and seedling stage[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9):2239-2247. | |
[21] | 余宝宝. 新疆阿拉尔地区土壤盐渍化的发育规律及防治技术[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2021. |
YU Baobao. Development law and prevention and control technology of soil salinization in alar region, xinjiang[D]. Chang’an University, 2021. | |
[22] | 刘娜. 陆地棉耐盐性评价及遗传分析[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2019. |
LIU Na. Evaluation and genetic analysis of salt tolerance in upland cotton[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2019. | |
[23] | 王宁, 冯克云, 南宏宇, 等. 甘肃河西走廊棉区棉花萌发期和苗期耐盐性鉴定与评价[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018, 36(1):148-155. |
WANG Ning, FENG Keyun, NAN Hongyu, et al. Salt tolerance identification and evaluation of cotton at its germination and seedling stages in Hexi area of Gansu[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2018, 36(1):148-155. | |
[24] | 施洋, 杨华, 施庆华, 等. 海盐胁迫对棉花种子萌发的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2022,(15):18-22,26. |
SHI Yang, YANG Hua, SHI Qinghua, et al. Effects of Sea Salt Stress on Cotton Seed Germination[J]. Modern Agricultural Sciences and Technology, 2022,(15):18-22,26. | |
[25] | 赵康, 杨涛, 王红刚, 等. 42个新疆海岛棉品种萌发期耐盐性评价[J]. 作物杂志, 2022,(5):27-33. |
ZHAO Kang, YANG Tao, WANG Honggang, et al. Evaluation on Salt Tolerance of 42 Sea-Island Cotton (Gossypium barbadense) Varieties in Xinjiang during Germination Period[J]. Crops, 2022,(5):27-33. | |
[26] | 罗礽兰, 胡道武, 王静静, 等. 基于主成分分析和隶属函数的棉花种子萌发期耐涝性鉴定评价[J]. 中国棉花, 2023, 50(3):1-5. |
LUO Renglan, HU Daowu, WANG Jingjing, et al. Identification and evaluation of waterlogging tolerance of cotton seed at germination stage based on the principal component analysis and subordinate function[J]. China cotton, 2023, 50(3):1-5. | |
[27] | 黄雅婕, 任丹, 李生梅, 等. 陆地棉苗期的耐盐碱性评价及鉴定指标筛选[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(5):46-55. |
HUANG Yajie, REN Dan, LI Shengmei, et al. Evaluation and Screening of Salt and Alkali Tolerance Indices of Upland Cotton Seedlings[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5):46-55. |
[1] | ZHOU Xin, LIU Xuanfeng, JIANG Yuhan, ZHANG Haichun, YANG Yuxin, Yeerbdati Tiemuer, JIANG Yongxin, ZHANG Li. Current situation and development proposal of mechanized recovery and resource utilization of used mulch film in cotton fields in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 131-141. |
[2] | MIAO Hongping, WANG Xiaowei, TIAN Conghua, LI Zhi, ZHANG Yuxin, DAI Junsheng. Evolution characteristics and driving factors of cotton production and distribution in Tarim River basin [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 217-226. |
[3] | WANG Junduo, CUI Yujiang, LIANG Yajun, GONG Zhaolong, ZHENG Junyun, LI Xueyuan. Xinjiang cotton production advantageous regional layout scheme [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 60-69. |
[4] | ZHENG Juyun, GONG Zhaolong, LIANG Yajun, GENG Shiwei, SUN Fenglei, YANG ni, LI Xueyuan, WANG Junduo. Key technology model of machine-picked cotton production in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 70-74. |
[5] | LI Jie, LIU Jia, WANG Liang, ZHANG Na, YANG Yanlong, ZHENG Zipiao, WEI Xin, WANG Meng, ZHOU Zixin, YANG Ni, GONG Zhaolong, HOU Xianfei, HUANG Qixiu, Abudukadier kuerban, ZHANG Jipeng, CHANG Pengzhong. Current situation of transformation and application of scientific and technological achievements of "cotton, oil and sugar" [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 89-94. |
[6] | BIAN Qingyong, FU Yanbo, QI Tong, HUANG Jian, PU Shenghai, MENG Ajing, Halihashi Yibati. Study on influencing factors of cotton emergence and protection measures in saline-alkali land in southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 95-100. |
[7] | LI Yongtai, GAO Axiang, LI Yanjun, ZHANG Xinyu. Effects of defoliants on the physiological characteristics of cotton varieties with different sensitivities [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2094-2102. |
[8] | ZHANG Zehua, YE Hanchun, WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao, LI Haiqiang, LIU Jian. Effects of equal nitrogen applied with urease inhibitor on cotton growth, yield, and quality under mulched drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111. |
[9] | CHEN Ruijie, LUO Linyi, RUAN Xiangyang, YE Jun. Effects of humic acid on soil nutrients, cotton yield and quality in cotton fields under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121. |
[10] | HUANG Boxuan, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, SHAO Jingjing, FENG Weina, PANG Chaoyou, XU Wenxiu, DONG Helin. Effects of different nitrogen inhibitors on growth, nitrogen utilization and yield of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131. |
[11] | WANG Chao, XU Wenxiu, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, FENG Weina, SHAO Jingjing, DONG Helin. Response of cotton seedling growth and development to soil available potassium levels [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2132-2139. |
[12] | ZHANG Fan, CHEN Xiaolu, WANG Jie, HOU Xianfei, JIA Donghai, GU Yuanguo, MIAO Haocui, LI Qiang. Effects of mixed salt stress on seed germination and seedling growth of peanut seed [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2168-2182. |
[13] | LIU Jing, DU Mingchuan, ZHANG Wenting, BAO Haijuan, JING Meiling, DU Wenhua. Screening of triticale germplasm in different areas of Qinghai [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2183-2190. |
[14] | ZHANG Tingjun, LI Zihui, CUI Yujiang, SUN Xiaogui, CHEN Fang. Effects of microbial agents on cotton growth and soil physico-chemical properties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2269-2276. |
[15] | DONG Zhiduo, XU Fei, FU Qiuping, HUANG Jian, QI Tong, MENG Ajing, FU Yanbo, Kaisaier Kuerban. Effects of different types of salt and alkali stress on cotton seed germination [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1831-1844. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 81
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 214
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||