Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (1): 30-38.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.01.004
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Molecular Genetics·Cultivation Physiology·Germplasm Resources • Previous Articles Next Articles
CAO Yang1(), YAN Yuping1, ZHU Bo1, FENG Zhenxiu1, ZHOU Xiaofeng2, LÜ Bo3, ZHANG Yan1, FANG Rui1
Received:
2021-01-25
Online:
2022-01-20
Published:
2022-02-18
Supported by:
曹阳1(), 严玉萍1, 朱波1, 冯振秀1, 周小凤2, 吕博3, 张燕1, 方瑞1
作者简介:
曹阳(1971-),男,河南人,研究员,研究方向为棉花遗传育种,(E-mail) 1725235568@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
CAO Yang, YAN Yuping, ZHU Bo, FENG Zhenxiu, ZHOU Xiaofeng, LÜ Bo, ZHANG Yan, FANG Rui. Comprehensive Traits Identification and Resource Utilization Analysis of Cotton Germplasm[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(1): 30-38.
曹阳, 严玉萍, 朱波, 冯振秀, 周小凤, 吕博, 张燕, 方瑞. 棉花种质综合性状鉴定及资源利用分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(1): 30-38.
株高Plant height(cm) | 30.0~39.9 | 40.0~49.9 | 50.0~59.9 | 60.0~69.9 | 70.0~79.9 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
品种数Number of varieties | 4 | 114 | 207 | 69 | 2 |
占总数Percentage(%) | 1.0 | 28.8 | 52.3 | 17.4 | 0.5 |
果枝数(个)Fruit branch number | 5.0~5.9 | 6.0~6.9 | 7.0~7.9 | 8.0~8.9 | 9.0~9.9 |
品种数Number of varieties | 23 | 109 | 169 | 89 | 6 |
占总数Percentage(%) | 5.8 | 27.5 | 42.7 | 22.5 | 1.5 |
始果节位First fruit node position | 3.0~3.9 | 4.0~4.9 | 5.0~5.9 | 6.0~6.9 | 7.0~7.9 |
品种数Number of varieties | 3 | 43 | 237 | 107 | 6 |
占总数Percentage(%) | 0.8 | 10.9 | 59.8 | 27.0 | 1.5 |
始果节高度First fruit node height(cm) | ≤10 | 10.1~15.0 | 15.1~20.0 | 20.1~25.0 | 25.1~30.0 |
品种数Number of varieties | 1 | 40 | 197 | 146 | 12 |
占总数Percentage(%) | 0.3 | 10.1 | 49.7 | 36.9 | 3.0 |
空果枝数(个)Empty fruit branch number | 0~0.9 | 1.0~1.9 | 2.0~2.9 | 3.0~3.9 | 4.0~4.9 |
品种数Number of varieties | 15 | 137 | 178 | 57 | 9 |
占总数Percentage(%) | 3.8 | 34.6 | 44.9 | 14.4 | 2.3 |
单株铃数(个)Boll number per plant | 3.0~3.9 | 4.0~4.9 | 5.0~5.9 | 6.0~6.9 | ≥7.0 |
品种数Number of varieties | 24 | 83 | 154 | 90 | 45 |
占总数Percentage(%) | 6.1 | 21.0 | 38.9 | 22.7 | 11.4 |
Table 1 Distribution of main phenotypic characters
株高Plant height(cm) | 30.0~39.9 | 40.0~49.9 | 50.0~59.9 | 60.0~69.9 | 70.0~79.9 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
品种数Number of varieties | 4 | 114 | 207 | 69 | 2 |
占总数Percentage(%) | 1.0 | 28.8 | 52.3 | 17.4 | 0.5 |
果枝数(个)Fruit branch number | 5.0~5.9 | 6.0~6.9 | 7.0~7.9 | 8.0~8.9 | 9.0~9.9 |
品种数Number of varieties | 23 | 109 | 169 | 89 | 6 |
占总数Percentage(%) | 5.8 | 27.5 | 42.7 | 22.5 | 1.5 |
始果节位First fruit node position | 3.0~3.9 | 4.0~4.9 | 5.0~5.9 | 6.0~6.9 | 7.0~7.9 |
品种数Number of varieties | 3 | 43 | 237 | 107 | 6 |
占总数Percentage(%) | 0.8 | 10.9 | 59.8 | 27.0 | 1.5 |
始果节高度First fruit node height(cm) | ≤10 | 10.1~15.0 | 15.1~20.0 | 20.1~25.0 | 25.1~30.0 |
品种数Number of varieties | 1 | 40 | 197 | 146 | 12 |
占总数Percentage(%) | 0.3 | 10.1 | 49.7 | 36.9 | 3.0 |
空果枝数(个)Empty fruit branch number | 0~0.9 | 1.0~1.9 | 2.0~2.9 | 3.0~3.9 | 4.0~4.9 |
品种数Number of varieties | 15 | 137 | 178 | 57 | 9 |
占总数Percentage(%) | 3.8 | 34.6 | 44.9 | 14.4 | 2.3 |
单株铃数(个)Boll number per plant | 3.0~3.9 | 4.0~4.9 | 5.0~5.9 | 6.0~6.9 | ≥7.0 |
品种数Number of varieties | 24 | 83 | 154 | 90 | 45 |
占总数Percentage(%) | 6.1 | 21.0 | 38.9 | 22.7 | 11.4 |
铃重Boll weight | 衣分Lint percentage | 籽指Seed index | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均 Average (g) | 品种数目 Number of varieties | 占总数 Percentage (%) | 平均 Average (%) | 品种数目 Number of varieties | 占总数 Percentage (%) | 平均 Average (g) | 品种数目 Number of varieties | 占总数 Percentage (%) |
<4.0 | 8 | 2.0 | <35.0 | 22 | 5.6 | 8.0~8.9.0 | 13 | 3.3 |
4.0~4.4 | 41 | 10.4 | 35.1~37.9 | 43 | 10.9 | 9.0~9.9 | 90 | 22.7 |
4.5~4.9 | 112 | 28.3 | 38.0~39.9 | 59 | 14.9 | 10.0~10.9 | 183 | 46.2 |
5.0~5.4 | 156 | 39.4 | 40.0~41.9 | 95 | 24.0 | 11.0~11.9 | 88 | 22.2 |
5.5~5.9 | 68 | 17.2 | 42.0~43.9 | 121 | 30.6 | 12.0~12.9 | 15 | 3.8 |
6.0~6.4 | 10 | 2.5 | 44.0~45.9 | 46 | 11.6 | 13.0~13.9 | 4 | 1.0 |
≥6.5 | 1 | 0.3 | ≥46.0 | 10 | 2.5 | ≥14 | 3 | 0.8 |
Table 2 Distribution of characters in seed examination
铃重Boll weight | 衣分Lint percentage | 籽指Seed index | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均 Average (g) | 品种数目 Number of varieties | 占总数 Percentage (%) | 平均 Average (%) | 品种数目 Number of varieties | 占总数 Percentage (%) | 平均 Average (g) | 品种数目 Number of varieties | 占总数 Percentage (%) |
<4.0 | 8 | 2.0 | <35.0 | 22 | 5.6 | 8.0~8.9.0 | 13 | 3.3 |
4.0~4.4 | 41 | 10.4 | 35.1~37.9 | 43 | 10.9 | 9.0~9.9 | 90 | 22.7 |
4.5~4.9 | 112 | 28.3 | 38.0~39.9 | 59 | 14.9 | 10.0~10.9 | 183 | 46.2 |
5.0~5.4 | 156 | 39.4 | 40.0~41.9 | 95 | 24.0 | 11.0~11.9 | 88 | 22.2 |
5.5~5.9 | 68 | 17.2 | 42.0~43.9 | 121 | 30.6 | 12.0~12.9 | 15 | 3.8 |
6.0~6.4 | 10 | 2.5 | 44.0~45.9 | 46 | 11.6 | 13.0~13.9 | 4 | 1.0 |
≥6.5 | 1 | 0.3 | ≥46.0 | 10 | 2.5 | ≥14 | 3 | 0.8 |
籽棉产量Seed cotton yield | 皮棉产量Lint yield | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均 Average(kg/hm2) | 品种数目(个) Number of varieties | 占总数 Percentage(%) | 平均 Average(kg/hm2) | 品种数目(个) Number of varieties | 占总数 Percentage(%) |
<2 250 | 3 | 0.8 | <1 050 | 9 | 2.3 |
2 250~3 000 | 10 | 2.5 | 1 051~1 500 | 61 | 15.4 |
3 001~3 750 | 47 | 11.9 | 1 501~1 800 | 85 | 21.5 |
3 751~4 500 | 100 | 25.3 | 1 801~2 100 | 97 | 24.5 |
4 501~5 250 | 111 | 28.0 | 2 101~2 400 | 61 | 15.4 |
5 251~6 000 | 80 | 20.2 | 2 401~2 700 | 53 | 13.4 |
6 001~6 750 | 28 | 7.1 | 2 701~3 000 | 15 | 3.8 |
6 751~7 500 | 9 | 2.3 | 3 001~3 300 | 11 | 2.8 |
7 501~8 250 | 5 | 1.3 | 3 301~3 750 | 2 | 0.5 |
≥8 251 | 3 | 0.8 | ≥3 751 | 2 | 0.5 |
Table 3 Distribution of yield
籽棉产量Seed cotton yield | 皮棉产量Lint yield | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均 Average(kg/hm2) | 品种数目(个) Number of varieties | 占总数 Percentage(%) | 平均 Average(kg/hm2) | 品种数目(个) Number of varieties | 占总数 Percentage(%) |
<2 250 | 3 | 0.8 | <1 050 | 9 | 2.3 |
2 250~3 000 | 10 | 2.5 | 1 051~1 500 | 61 | 15.4 |
3 001~3 750 | 47 | 11.9 | 1 501~1 800 | 85 | 21.5 |
3 751~4 500 | 100 | 25.3 | 1 801~2 100 | 97 | 24.5 |
4 501~5 250 | 111 | 28.0 | 2 101~2 400 | 61 | 15.4 |
5 251~6 000 | 80 | 20.2 | 2 401~2 700 | 53 | 13.4 |
6 001~6 750 | 28 | 7.1 | 2 701~3 000 | 15 | 3.8 |
6 751~7 500 | 9 | 2.3 | 3 001~3 300 | 11 | 2.8 |
7 501~8 250 | 5 | 1.3 | 3 301~3 750 | 2 | 0.5 |
≥8 251 | 3 | 0.8 | ≥3 751 | 2 | 0.5 |
调查时间 Investigation time | 项目 Project | 0 | 0.1~5.0 | 5.1~10.0 | 10.1~20.0 | 20.1~35.0 | ≥35.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6月底病指 Disease index at the end of June | 品种数 | 218 | 169 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
占总数(%) | 55.1 | 42.7 | 2.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
8月底校正病指 Correction of disease index at the end of August | 品种数 | 5 | 21 | 47 | 125 | 127 | 71 |
占总数(%) | 1.3 | 5.3 | 11.9 | 31.6 | 32.1 | 17.9 |
Table 4 Distribution of disease index of Verticillium wilt in the tested germplasm resources
调查时间 Investigation time | 项目 Project | 0 | 0.1~5.0 | 5.1~10.0 | 10.1~20.0 | 20.1~35.0 | ≥35.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6月底病指 Disease index at the end of June | 品种数 | 218 | 169 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
占总数(%) | 55.1 | 42.7 | 2.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
8月底校正病指 Correction of disease index at the end of August | 品种数 | 5 | 21 | 47 | 125 | 127 | 71 |
占总数(%) | 1.3 | 5.3 | 11.9 | 31.6 | 32.1 | 17.9 |
纤维长度Fiber length(mm) | 22.0~27.9 | 28.0~29.9 | 30.0-30.9 | 31.0~31.9 | 32.0~35.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
品种数Number of varieties | 52 | 199 | 98 | 35 | 12 |
占总数Percentage(%) | 13.1 | 50.3 | 24.7 | 8.8 | 3.0 |
整齐度Uniformity(%) | <77.0 | 77.0~79.9 | 80.0~82.9 | 83.0~85.9 | ≥86.0 |
品种数Number of varieties | 0 | 0 | 6 | 220 | 170 |
占总数Percentage(%) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 55.6 | 42.9 |
马克隆值Micronaire value | 3.7~4.2 | 3.5~3.6 | 4.3~4.9 | 3.4及以下 | 5.0及以上 |
品种数Number of varieties | 133 | 13 | 219 | 9 | 22 |
占总数Percentage(%) | 33.6 | 3.3 | 55.3 | 2.3 | 5.6 |
比强度Fiber strength(cN/tex) | 20.0~27.9 | 28.0~29.9 | 30.0~31.9 | 32.0~33.9 | ≥34.0 |
品种数Number of varieties | 45 | 77 | 73 | 97 | 104 |
占总数Percentage(%) | 11.4 | 19.4 | 18.4 | 24.5 | 26.3 |
伸长率Elongation(%) | ≤6.6 | 6.7 | 6.8 | 6.9 | ≥7.0 |
品种数Number of varieties | 21 | 50 | 126 | 109 | 90 |
占总数Percentage(%) | 5.3 | 12.6 | 31.8 | 27.5 | 22.7 |
Table 5 Distribution table of fiber quality characters
纤维长度Fiber length(mm) | 22.0~27.9 | 28.0~29.9 | 30.0-30.9 | 31.0~31.9 | 32.0~35.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
品种数Number of varieties | 52 | 199 | 98 | 35 | 12 |
占总数Percentage(%) | 13.1 | 50.3 | 24.7 | 8.8 | 3.0 |
整齐度Uniformity(%) | <77.0 | 77.0~79.9 | 80.0~82.9 | 83.0~85.9 | ≥86.0 |
品种数Number of varieties | 0 | 0 | 6 | 220 | 170 |
占总数Percentage(%) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 55.6 | 42.9 |
马克隆值Micronaire value | 3.7~4.2 | 3.5~3.6 | 4.3~4.9 | 3.4及以下 | 5.0及以上 |
品种数Number of varieties | 133 | 13 | 219 | 9 | 22 |
占总数Percentage(%) | 33.6 | 3.3 | 55.3 | 2.3 | 5.6 |
比强度Fiber strength(cN/tex) | 20.0~27.9 | 28.0~29.9 | 30.0~31.9 | 32.0~33.9 | ≥34.0 |
品种数Number of varieties | 45 | 77 | 73 | 97 | 104 |
占总数Percentage(%) | 11.4 | 19.4 | 18.4 | 24.5 | 26.3 |
伸长率Elongation(%) | ≤6.6 | 6.7 | 6.8 | 6.9 | ≥7.0 |
品种数Number of varieties | 21 | 50 | 126 | 109 | 90 |
占总数Percentage(%) | 5.3 | 12.6 | 31.8 | 27.5 | 22.7 |
种质名称 Germplasm name | 生育期 Growth period (d) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) | 皮棉产量 Lint yield (kg/hm2) | 纤维长度 Fiber length (mm) | 马值隆值 Micronaire value | 比强度 Fiber strength (cN/tex) | 校正病指 Corrected disease index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新陆早82号(Y17) | 119 | 42.7 | 3 871.5 | 28.7 | 4.3 | 32.7 | 19.7 |
K2725 | 118 | 45.5 | 3 471.0 | 29.5 | 4.3 | 31.8 | 8.9 |
石K14 | 117 | 40.6 | 3 387.8 | 29.6 | 4.4 | 32.6 | 18.7 |
鲁K638 | 130 | 42.8 | 3 222.0 | 28.5 | 5.2 | 29.3 | 0.0 |
JF-2 | 121 | 40.4 | 3 180.0 | 32.3 | 3.8 | 36.9 | 2.4 |
新陆早61号 | 121 | 43.1 | 3 153.8 | 30.4 | 4.2 | 35.6 | 5.2 |
国欣棉3号 | 129 | 41.6 | 3 134.3 | 30.8 | 4.7 | 32.9 | 16.2 |
SW1 | 123 | 42.7 | 3 111.0 | 29.9 | 3.8 | 37.1 | 12.5 |
G2-2-5 | 123 | 41.4 | 3 054.8 | 32.0 | 4.3 | 39.2 | 1.0 |
晋棉36号 | 121 | 44.2 | 2 861.3 | 28.8 | 4.8 | 31.0 | 11.9 |
B4-23 | 125 | 44.5 | 2 840.3 | 30.2 | 4.6 | 33.2 | 4.6 |
光叶岱字棉 | 119 | 43.6 | 2 827.5 | 30.0 | 4.2 | 37.0 | 15.3 |
新陆中15号 | 126 | 42.4 | 2 739.0 | 29.5 | 4.1 | 35.2 | 18.5 |
新陆中42号 | 120 | 42.8 | 2 716.5 | 29.5 | 4.0 | 32.0 | 11.2 |
邯棉885 | 130 | 43.4 | 2 675.3 | 30.9 | 4.4 | 34.7 | 17.0 |
豫棉20 | 128 | 41.4 | 2 625.0 | 30.6 | 4.2 | 32.0 | 6.7 |
Table 6 Results of main traits of the 16 selected excellent germplasm
种质名称 Germplasm name | 生育期 Growth period (d) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) | 皮棉产量 Lint yield (kg/hm2) | 纤维长度 Fiber length (mm) | 马值隆值 Micronaire value | 比强度 Fiber strength (cN/tex) | 校正病指 Corrected disease index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新陆早82号(Y17) | 119 | 42.7 | 3 871.5 | 28.7 | 4.3 | 32.7 | 19.7 |
K2725 | 118 | 45.5 | 3 471.0 | 29.5 | 4.3 | 31.8 | 8.9 |
石K14 | 117 | 40.6 | 3 387.8 | 29.6 | 4.4 | 32.6 | 18.7 |
鲁K638 | 130 | 42.8 | 3 222.0 | 28.5 | 5.2 | 29.3 | 0.0 |
JF-2 | 121 | 40.4 | 3 180.0 | 32.3 | 3.8 | 36.9 | 2.4 |
新陆早61号 | 121 | 43.1 | 3 153.8 | 30.4 | 4.2 | 35.6 | 5.2 |
国欣棉3号 | 129 | 41.6 | 3 134.3 | 30.8 | 4.7 | 32.9 | 16.2 |
SW1 | 123 | 42.7 | 3 111.0 | 29.9 | 3.8 | 37.1 | 12.5 |
G2-2-5 | 123 | 41.4 | 3 054.8 | 32.0 | 4.3 | 39.2 | 1.0 |
晋棉36号 | 121 | 44.2 | 2 861.3 | 28.8 | 4.8 | 31.0 | 11.9 |
B4-23 | 125 | 44.5 | 2 840.3 | 30.2 | 4.6 | 33.2 | 4.6 |
光叶岱字棉 | 119 | 43.6 | 2 827.5 | 30.0 | 4.2 | 37.0 | 15.3 |
新陆中15号 | 126 | 42.4 | 2 739.0 | 29.5 | 4.1 | 35.2 | 18.5 |
新陆中42号 | 120 | 42.8 | 2 716.5 | 29.5 | 4.0 | 32.0 | 11.2 |
邯棉885 | 130 | 43.4 | 2 675.3 | 30.9 | 4.4 | 34.7 | 17.0 |
豫棉20 | 128 | 41.4 | 2 625.0 | 30.6 | 4.2 | 32.0 | 6.7 |
[1] | 刘剑光, 赵君, 吴巧娟, 等. 棉花新种质系的性状鉴定与育种利用评价[J]. 西南农业学报, 2014, 27(4):1414-1418. |
LIU Qianguang, ZHAO Jun, WU Qiaojuan. Identification and Appraisal on Characters of New Germplasm Lines in Upland Cotton[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 27(4):1414-1418. | |
[2] | 杜雄明, 刘方, 王坤波, 等. 棉花种质资源收集鉴定与创新利用[J]. 棉花学报, 2017,(z1):51-61. |
DU Xiongming, LIU Fang, WANG Kunbo. Collection, Evaluation and Utilization of Cotton Germplasm[J]. Cotton Science, 2017,(z1):51-61. | |
[3] | 孙君灵, 周忠丽, 贾银华, 等. “十一五”棉花优异创新种质简介[J]. 江西棉花, 2011, 33(4):55-57. |
SUN Junling, ZHOU Zhongli, JIA Yinhua, et al. Brief introduction of excellent and innovative Cotton Germplasm during the Eleventh five-year Plan[J]. Jiangxi Cotton, 2011, 33(4):55-57. | |
[4] | 卢新雄, 辛霞, 刘旭. 作物种质资源安全保存原理与技术[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019. |
LU Xinxiong, XIN Xia, LIU XU, Principle and Technology of safe Preservation of crop Germplasm Resources [M]. Beijing: science Press, 2019. | |
[5] | 喻树迅. 我国棉花遗传育种进展与展望[J]. 棉花学报, 2003, 15(2):120-124. |
YU Shuxun. The Evolutions and Prospect of Cotton Genetics and Breeding in China[J]. Cotton Sciences, 2003, 15(2):120-124. | |
[6] | 曹阳, 严玉萍, 朱波, 等. 棉花核心种质的创制及性状鉴定研究[J]. 绿洲农业科学与工程, 2018, 4(1):3-10. |
CAO Yang, YAN Yuping, ZHU Bo, et al. Study on the Establishment and character Identification of Cotton Core Collection[J]. Oasis Agriculture Science and Engineering, 2018, 4(1):3-10. | |
[7] | 胡玉枢. 辽宁棉花种质资源研究思路与方法[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2016,(4):42-45. |
HU Yushu. Research ideas and methods of Cotton Germplasm Resources in Liaoning Province[J]. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences | |
[8] | 吴香华, 肖水平, 孙亮庆, 等. 江西新引进棉花种质资源的鉴定与筛选[J]. 江西棉花, 2011, 33(4):19-24. |
WU Xianghua, XIAO Shuiping, SUN Liangqin, et al. Identification and Screening of the Newly Introduced Cotton Germplasm Resources in Jiangxi Province[J]. Jiangxi Cotton, 2011, 33(4):19-24. | |
[9] | 王林辉, 余正军, 刘少卿, 等. 27个棉花育种材料的产量度部分纤堆品质差异分析[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 35(1):9-12. |
WANG Linhui, YU Zhengjun, LIU Shaoqing, et al. Differences analysis on yield and fiber quality of 27 cotton varieties[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences Ed.), 2009, 35(1):9-12. | |
[10] |
石志钰, 裴雅琨, 朱玉涛, 等. 基于数字图像棉花黄萎病诊断与防治的管理远程监测[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(6):1166-1174.
DOI |
SHI Zhiyu, FEI Yakun, ZHU Yutao, et al. Study on remote monitoring of cotton verticillium wilt diagnosis and control management based on digital image[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(6):1166-1174.
DOI |
|
[11] | 张文蔚, 赵磊, 王升正, 等. 10个棉花品种(系)田间人工病圃黄萎病抗性稳定性分析[J]. 中国棉花, 2012, 39(5);20-22. |
ZHANG Wenwei, ZHAO Lei, WANG Shengzheng, et al. Stability Analysis on Verticillium Wilt Resistance of Ten Cotton Cultivars in Disease Nursery[J]. China Cotton, 2012, 39(5);20-22. | |
[12] | 杜雄明, 周忠丽. 棉花种质资源调查标准和描述规范[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005. |
DU Xiongming, ZHOU Zhongli. Investigation Standard and description Standard of Cotton Germplasm Resources [M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2005. | |
[13] | 王爱玉, 赵金辉, 王志伟, 等. 抗虫棉数量性状的相关及通径分析[J]. 山东农业科学, 2014, 46(9):24-26. |
WANG Aiyu, ZHAO Jinhui, WANG Zhiwei, et al. Correlation and Path Analysis of Quantitative Traits in Insect-Resistant Cotton[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 46(9):24-26. | |
[14] | 潘存祥, 许勇, 纪海波, 等. 西瓜种质资源表型多样性及聚类分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2015, 16(1):59-63. |
PAN Cunxiang, XU Yong, JI Haibo, et al. Phenotypic Diversity and Clustering Analysis of Watermelon Germplasm[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2015, 16(1):59-63. | |
[15] | 曹阳, 严玉萍, 冯振秀, 等. 棉花F1性状与亲本关系分析[J]. 广东农业科学, 2014, 41(4):28-31. |
CAO Yang, YAN Yuping, GENG Zhenxiu, et al. Analysis on relationship of cotton traits between F1 hybrid and parents[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 41(4):28-31. | |
[16] | 孙振纲, 姜艳丽, 陈耕, 等. 山西陆地棉品种资源农艺性状鉴定结果分析[J]. 中国棉花, 2014, 41(12):15-16,19. |
SUN Zhengan, JIANG Yanli, CHEN Gen, et al. Analysis on Identification Results of Agronomical Characters of Cotton Germplasm Resources in Shanxi Province[J]. China Cotton, 2014, 41(12):15-16,19. | |
[17] | 田琴, 司爱君, 陈红, 等. 新陆早系列棉花品种产量性状与品质性状的相关性[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2018, 46(2):1-4. |
TIAN Qin, SHI Aijun, CHEN Hong, et al. Correlation between Yield and Quality Trait of Xinluzao Series Cotton Varieties[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(2):1-4. | |
[18] | 张冬梅, 张艳军, 李存东, 等. 论棉花轻简化栽培[J]. 棉花学报, 2019, 31(2):163-168. |
ZHANG Dongmei, ZHANG Yanjun, LI Cundong, et al. On Light and Simplified Cotton Cultivation[J]. Cotton Science, 2019, 31(2):163-168. | |
[19] | 谢标洪, 孔令甲, 邱新平, 等. 棉花种质资源和品种(系)的抗黄萎病性鉴定[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2001, 47(4):23-24. |
XIE Biaohong, KONG Lingjia, QIU Xinping, et al. Identification of Resistance to Verticillium Wilt of Cotton Germplasm Resources and varieties (Lines)[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2001, 47(4):23-24. | |
[20] | 陈志宏, 李新一, 王加亭, 等. 中国苜蓿种质资源保护及创新利用[J]. 种子, 2020, 39(5):59-63. |
CHEN Zhihong, LI Xinyi, WANG Jiating, et al. Conservation and Innovative Utilization of Alfalfa Germplasm Resources in China[J]. Seed, 2020, 39(5):59-63. | |
[21] | 熊宗伟, 王雪姣, 顾生浩, 等. 中国主产棉区气象因子和纤维品质的相关性研究[J]. 棉花学报, 2014, 26(2):95-104. |
XIONG Zhongwei, WANG Xuejiao, GU Shenghao, et al. Correlation between Meteorological Factors and Cotton Fiber Quality in Major Cotton-producing Region of China[J]. Cotton Science, 2014, 26(2):95-104. |
[1] | ZHOU Xin, LIU Xuanfeng, JIANG Yuhan, ZHANG Haichun, YANG Yuxin, Yeerbdati Tiemuer, JIANG Yongxin, ZHANG Li. Current situation and development proposal of mechanized recovery and resource utilization of used mulch film in cotton fields in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 131-141. |
[2] | MIAO Hongping, WANG Xiaowei, TIAN Conghua, LI Zhi, ZHANG Yuxin, DAI Junsheng. Evolution characteristics and driving factors of cotton production and distribution in Tarim River basin [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 217-226. |
[3] | WANG Junduo, CUI Yujiang, LIANG Yajun, GONG Zhaolong, ZHENG Junyun, LI Xueyuan. Xinjiang cotton production advantageous regional layout scheme [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 60-69. |
[4] | ZHENG Juyun, GONG Zhaolong, LIANG Yajun, GENG Shiwei, SUN Fenglei, YANG ni, LI Xueyuan, WANG Junduo. Key technology model of machine-picked cotton production in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 70-74. |
[5] | LI Jie, LIU Jia, WANG Liang, ZHANG Na, YANG Yanlong, ZHENG Zipiao, WEI Xin, WANG Meng, ZHOU Zixin, YANG Ni, GONG Zhaolong, HOU Xianfei, HUANG Qixiu, Abudukadier kuerban, ZHANG Jipeng, CHANG Pengzhong. Current situation of transformation and application of scientific and technological achievements of "cotton, oil and sugar" [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 89-94. |
[6] | BIAN Qingyong, FU Yanbo, QI Tong, HUANG Jian, PU Shenghai, MENG Ajing, Halihashi Yibati. Study on influencing factors of cotton emergence and protection measures in saline-alkali land in southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 95-100. |
[7] | LI Yongtai, GAO Axiang, LI Yanjun, ZHANG Xinyu. Effects of defoliants on the physiological characteristics of cotton varieties with different sensitivities [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2094-2102. |
[8] | ZHANG Zehua, YE Hanchun, WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao, LI Haiqiang, LIU Jian. Effects of equal nitrogen applied with urease inhibitor on cotton growth, yield, and quality under mulched drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111. |
[9] | CHEN Ruijie, LUO Linyi, RUAN Xiangyang, YE Jun. Effects of humic acid on soil nutrients, cotton yield and quality in cotton fields under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121. |
[10] | HUANG Boxuan, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, SHAO Jingjing, FENG Weina, PANG Chaoyou, XU Wenxiu, DONG Helin. Effects of different nitrogen inhibitors on growth, nitrogen utilization and yield of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131. |
[11] | WANG Chao, XU Wenxiu, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, FENG Weina, SHAO Jingjing, DONG Helin. Response of cotton seedling growth and development to soil available potassium levels [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2132-2139. |
[12] | TIAN Haiyan, ZHANG Zhanqin, XIE Jianhui, WANG Jianjiang, YANG Xiangkun. Study on the relationship between Lycopene and main quality characters of processing tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2197-2202. |
[13] | ZHANG Tingjun, LI Zihui, CUI Yujiang, SUN Xiaogui, CHEN Fang. Effects of microbial agents on cotton growth and soil physico-chemical properties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2269-2276. |
[14] | CHEN Yong, ZHOU Lei, SUI Chun, LIN Caixia. The characteristics of 32 cultivated germplasms of Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus in Xinjiang production area [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2307-2314. |
[15] | DONG Zhiduo, XU Fei, FU Qiuping, HUANG Jian, QI Tong, MENG Ajing, FU Yanbo, Kaisaier Kuerban. Effects of different types of salt and alkali stress on cotton seed germination [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1831-1844. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 92
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 179
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||