Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2021, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (10): 1765-1774.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.10.001
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Germplasm Resources·Molecular Genetics·Cultivation Physiology·Physiology and Biochenistry·Agricultural Product Analysis and Detection • Previous Articles Next Articles
Qiong LI(), Shihao CHANG, Wentao SHU, Qingchun YANG, Jinhua LI, Donghui ZHANG, Baoliang ZHANG, Laicheng ZHANG, Zhen GENG(
)
Received:
2021-01-22
Online:
2021-10-20
Published:
2021-10-26
Correspondence author:
Zhen GENG
Supported by:
李琼(), 常世豪, 舒文涛, 杨青春, 李金花, 张东辉, 张保亮, 张来成, 耿臻(
)
通讯作者:
耿臻
作者简介:
李琼(1985-),女,河南周口人,助理研究员,硕士,研究方向为大豆遗传育种与栽培,(E-mail) 15290067998@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Qiong LI, Shihao CHANG, Wentao SHU, Qingchun YANG, Jinhua LI, Donghui ZHANG, Baoliang ZHANG, Laicheng ZHANG, Zhen GENG. Comprehensive Analysis of Agronomic Characters of 46 Soybean Varieties (Lines) of Summer Soybeans (South) in Huang-huai-hai Region[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(10): 1765-1774.
李琼, 常世豪, 舒文涛, 杨青春, 李金花, 张东辉, 张保亮, 张来成, 耿臻. 黄淮海地区夏大豆(南片)46份大豆品种(系)农艺性状综合分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(10): 1765-1774.
国家黄淮海夏大豆(南片)中间试验 National Huang-huai-hai Summer Soybean (South) Intermediate Test | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
编号 Number | 品种(系) Variety(line) | 来源 Source | 编号 Number | 品种(系) Variety(line) | 来源 Source |
1 | 山宁23 | 山东 | 24 | 皖宿1019 | 安徽 |
2 | 华豆22 | 山东 | 25 | 郑1440 | 河南 |
3 | 安豆115 | 河南 | 26 | 中豆4901 | 湖北 |
4 | 邯豆15 | 河北 | 27 | 商豆151 | 河南 |
5 | 皇豆12 | 山东 | 28 | 宿豆051 | 安徽 |
6 | 潍豆1897 | 山东 | 29 | 冀1801 | 河北 |
7 | 濮豆754 | 河南 | 30 | 齐黄45 | 山东 |
8 | 菏育10号 | 山东 | 31 | 宿豆219 | 安徽 |
9 | 柳豆108 | 安徽 | 32 | 菏豆44 | 山东 |
10 | 兴豆985 | 湖北 | 33 | 周豆41号 | 河南 |
11 | 淮豆17 | 江苏 | 34 | 中黄207 | 北京 |
12 | 南农47 | 江苏 | 35 | 菏豆39 | 山东 |
13 | 郓豆1号 | 山东 | 36 | 淮豆16 | 江苏 |
14 | 濮豆5110 | 河南 | 37 | 徐豆24 | 江苏 |
15 | 兴农豆2号 | 山东 | 38 | 周豆34号 | 河南 |
16 | 洛豆1305 | 河南 | 39 | 皖宿061 | 安徽 |
17 | 恒豆6号 | 安徽 | 40 | 皖宿112 | 安徽 |
18 | 圣育6号 | 山东 | 41 | 中黄321 | 北京 |
19 | 徐9416-8 | 江苏 | 42 | 阜豆19 | 安徽 |
20 | 邯豆13 | 河北 | 43 | 皖豆40 | 安徽 |
21 | 山宁28 | 山东 | 44 | 山宁27 | 山东 |
22 | 菏豆37 | 山东 | 45 | 圣豆106 | 山东 |
23 | 南农60 | 江苏 | 46 | 圣豆21 | 山东 |
Table 1 Details of tested soybean varieties(lines)
国家黄淮海夏大豆(南片)中间试验 National Huang-huai-hai Summer Soybean (South) Intermediate Test | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
编号 Number | 品种(系) Variety(line) | 来源 Source | 编号 Number | 品种(系) Variety(line) | 来源 Source |
1 | 山宁23 | 山东 | 24 | 皖宿1019 | 安徽 |
2 | 华豆22 | 山东 | 25 | 郑1440 | 河南 |
3 | 安豆115 | 河南 | 26 | 中豆4901 | 湖北 |
4 | 邯豆15 | 河北 | 27 | 商豆151 | 河南 |
5 | 皇豆12 | 山东 | 28 | 宿豆051 | 安徽 |
6 | 潍豆1897 | 山东 | 29 | 冀1801 | 河北 |
7 | 濮豆754 | 河南 | 30 | 齐黄45 | 山东 |
8 | 菏育10号 | 山东 | 31 | 宿豆219 | 安徽 |
9 | 柳豆108 | 安徽 | 32 | 菏豆44 | 山东 |
10 | 兴豆985 | 湖北 | 33 | 周豆41号 | 河南 |
11 | 淮豆17 | 江苏 | 34 | 中黄207 | 北京 |
12 | 南农47 | 江苏 | 35 | 菏豆39 | 山东 |
13 | 郓豆1号 | 山东 | 36 | 淮豆16 | 江苏 |
14 | 濮豆5110 | 河南 | 37 | 徐豆24 | 江苏 |
15 | 兴农豆2号 | 山东 | 38 | 周豆34号 | 河南 |
16 | 洛豆1305 | 河南 | 39 | 皖宿061 | 安徽 |
17 | 恒豆6号 | 安徽 | 40 | 皖宿112 | 安徽 |
18 | 圣育6号 | 山东 | 41 | 中黄321 | 北京 |
19 | 徐9416-8 | 江苏 | 42 | 阜豆19 | 安徽 |
20 | 邯豆13 | 河北 | 43 | 皖豆40 | 安徽 |
21 | 山宁28 | 山东 | 44 | 山宁27 | 山东 |
22 | 菏豆37 | 山东 | 45 | 圣豆106 | 山东 |
23 | 南农60 | 江苏 | 46 | 圣豆21 | 山东 |
性状 Traits | 平均值 Mean | 变幅 Luffing | 标准差 SD | 变异系数 CV(%) | 多样性指数H' |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Y1(cm) | 72.054 | 54.9~107.8 | 12.445 | 17.27 | 1.858 |
Y2(cm) | 15.293 | 5.8~25.2 | 4.075 | 26.65 | 1.978 |
Y3(个) | 12.885 | 9.6~16.7 | 1.599 | 12.41 | 1.877 |
Y4(个) | 0.839 | 0~2.3 | 0.626 | 74.61 | 1.947 |
Y5(个) | 29.054 | 15~48.1 | 6.957 | 23.95 | 1.989 |
Y6(个) | 58.800 | 37.5~82.4 | 10.784 | 18.34 | 2.064 |
Y7(g) | 10.183 | 4.8~13.7 | 1.797 | 17.65 | 1.873 |
Y8(g) | 18.707 | 10.0~28.3 | 3.801 | 20.32 | 1.976 |
Y9(g) | 3 263.457 | 2 747~4 107 | 355.065 | 10.88 | 1.697 |
平均值 Average value | - | - | - | 24.67 | 1.918 |
Table 2 Genetic diversity analysis of main agronomic traits
性状 Traits | 平均值 Mean | 变幅 Luffing | 标准差 SD | 变异系数 CV(%) | 多样性指数H' |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Y1(cm) | 72.054 | 54.9~107.8 | 12.445 | 17.27 | 1.858 |
Y2(cm) | 15.293 | 5.8~25.2 | 4.075 | 26.65 | 1.978 |
Y3(个) | 12.885 | 9.6~16.7 | 1.599 | 12.41 | 1.877 |
Y4(个) | 0.839 | 0~2.3 | 0.626 | 74.61 | 1.947 |
Y5(个) | 29.054 | 15~48.1 | 6.957 | 23.95 | 1.989 |
Y6(个) | 58.800 | 37.5~82.4 | 10.784 | 18.34 | 2.064 |
Y7(g) | 10.183 | 4.8~13.7 | 1.797 | 17.65 | 1.873 |
Y8(g) | 18.707 | 10.0~28.3 | 3.801 | 20.32 | 1.976 |
Y9(g) | 3 263.457 | 2 747~4 107 | 355.065 | 10.88 | 1.697 |
平均值 Average value | - | - | - | 24.67 | 1.918 |
性状 Traits | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y4 | Y5 | Y6 | Y7 | Y8 | Y9 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Y1 | 1 | ||||||||
Y2 | 0.316* | 1 | |||||||
Y3 | 0.436** | 0.317* | 1 | ||||||
Y4 | -0.087 | -0.380** | -0.073 | 1 | |||||
Y5 | 0.119 | 0.138 | 0.192 | 0.161 | 1 | ||||
Y6 | 0.311* | 0.177 | 0.291 | 0.190 | 0.602** | 1 | |||
Y7 | 0.057 | -0.054 | 0.131 | -0.085 | 0.387** | 0.495** | 1 | ||
Y8 | -0.054 | -0.027 | -0.049 | -0.324* | 0.053 | -0.218 | 0.550** | 1 | |
Y9 | 0.224 | 0.085 | 0.071 | 0.023 | 0.171 | 0.439** | 0.465** | 0.313* | 1 |
Table 3 Correlation analysis of main agronomic traits
性状 Traits | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y4 | Y5 | Y6 | Y7 | Y8 | Y9 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Y1 | 1 | ||||||||
Y2 | 0.316* | 1 | |||||||
Y3 | 0.436** | 0.317* | 1 | ||||||
Y4 | -0.087 | -0.380** | -0.073 | 1 | |||||
Y5 | 0.119 | 0.138 | 0.192 | 0.161 | 1 | ||||
Y6 | 0.311* | 0.177 | 0.291 | 0.190 | 0.602** | 1 | |||
Y7 | 0.057 | -0.054 | 0.131 | -0.085 | 0.387** | 0.495** | 1 | ||
Y8 | -0.054 | -0.027 | -0.049 | -0.324* | 0.053 | -0.218 | 0.550** | 1 | |
Y9 | 0.224 | 0.085 | 0.071 | 0.023 | 0.171 | 0.439** | 0.465** | 0.313* | 1 |
成分 Ingredient | 初始特征值 Initial eigenvalue | 提取载荷平方和 Extract the sum of squares of the load | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总计 Total | 方差百分比 Variance (%) | 累积 Accumulation (%) | 总计 Total | 方差百分比 Variance (%) | 累积 Accumulation (%) | |
F1 | 2.645 | 29.384 | 29.384 | 2.645 | 29.384 | 29.384 |
F2 | 1.721 | 19.119 | 48.502 | 1.721 | 19.119 | 48.502 |
F3 | 1.620 | 17.998 | 66.500 | 1.620 | 17.998 | 66.500 |
4 | 0.864 | 9.599 | 76.099 | |||
5 | 0.745 | 8.276 | 84.375 | |||
6 | 0.511 | 5.679 | 90.054 | |||
7 | 0.486 | 5.404 | 95.458 | |||
8 | 0.317 | 3.524 | 98.983 | |||
9 | 0.092 | 1.017 | 100.000 |
Table 4 Variance contribution rate of principal component factors of main agronomic traits
成分 Ingredient | 初始特征值 Initial eigenvalue | 提取载荷平方和 Extract the sum of squares of the load | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总计 Total | 方差百分比 Variance (%) | 累积 Accumulation (%) | 总计 Total | 方差百分比 Variance (%) | 累积 Accumulation (%) | |
F1 | 2.645 | 29.384 | 29.384 | 2.645 | 29.384 | 29.384 |
F2 | 1.721 | 19.119 | 48.502 | 1.721 | 19.119 | 48.502 |
F3 | 1.620 | 17.998 | 66.500 | 1.620 | 17.998 | 66.500 |
4 | 0.864 | 9.599 | 76.099 | |||
5 | 0.745 | 8.276 | 84.375 | |||
6 | 0.511 | 5.679 | 90.054 | |||
7 | 0.486 | 5.404 | 95.458 | |||
8 | 0.317 | 3.524 | 98.983 | |||
9 | 0.092 | 1.017 | 100.000 |
性状 Traits | 成分 Ingredient | ||
---|---|---|---|
F1 | F2 | F3 | |
Y1 | 0.190 | 0.263 | -0.177 |
Y2 | 0.132 | 0.238 | -0.364 |
Y3 | 0.188 | 0.266 | -0.162 |
Y4 | -0.018 | 0.097 | 0.515 |
Y5 | 0.246 | 0.031 | 0.215 |
Y6 | 0.303 | 0.127 | 0.237 |
Y7 | 0.266 | -0.331 | 0.044 |
Y8 | 0.092 | -0.461 | -0.238 |
Y9 | 0.240 | -0.189 | 0.028 |
Table 5 Principal component score coefficient matrix of main of agronomic traits
性状 Traits | 成分 Ingredient | ||
---|---|---|---|
F1 | F2 | F3 | |
Y1 | 0.190 | 0.263 | -0.177 |
Y2 | 0.132 | 0.238 | -0.364 |
Y3 | 0.188 | 0.266 | -0.162 |
Y4 | -0.018 | 0.097 | 0.515 |
Y5 | 0.246 | 0.031 | 0.215 |
Y6 | 0.303 | 0.127 | 0.237 |
Y7 | 0.266 | -0.331 | 0.044 |
Y8 | 0.092 | -0.461 | -0.238 |
Y9 | 0.240 | -0.189 | 0.028 |
序号 Number | 品种 Variety | F1 | F2 | F3 | 综合得分 Overall ratings | 排名 Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 山宁23 | -0.925 | -0.850 | -0.389 | -0.758 | 41 |
2 | 华豆22 | 1.093 | -1.144 | -1.275 | -0.191 | 29 |
3 | 安豆115 | -0.085 | -0.936 | 1.631 | 0.135 | 17 |
4 | 邯豆15 | -0.462 | -1.622 | 1.742 | -0.199 | 30 |
5 | 皇豆12 | 0.354 | -0.590 | -0.590 | -0.173 | 27 |
6 | 潍豆1897 | -0.124 | 0.940 | -0.148 | 0.175 | 16 |
7 | 濮豆754 | 0.104 | 0.828 | -0.212 | 0.226 | 15 |
8 | 菏育10号 | -0.653 | -1.156 | -1.383 | -0.995 | 45 |
9 | 柳豆108 | -1.059 | -0.491 | 0.026 | -0.602 | 38 |
10 | 兴豆985 | -0.350 | 0.456 | -1.799 | -0.511 | 36 |
11 | 淮豆17 | 0.392 | 0.453 | 0.498 | 0.438 | 11 |
12 | 南农47 | 1.004 | 0.815 | 1.013 | 0.952 | 5 |
13 | 郓豆1号 | 0.845 | -0.649 | -0.669 | 0.006 | 24 |
14 | 濮豆5110 | 0.999 | 1.559 | 0.948 | 1.146 | 3 |
15 | 兴农豆2号 | -0.360 | -0.807 | 0.278 | -0.316 | 34 |
16 | 洛豆1305 | 0.786 | 0.358 | 0.257 | 0.520 | 9 |
17 | 恒豆6号 | 0.838 | -0.104 | 2.637 | 1.054 | 4 |
18 | 圣育6号 | -0.823 | -1.162 | -0.618 | -0.865 | 43 |
19 | 徐9416-8 | 0.119 | -0.112 | 0.102 | 0.048 | 21 |
20 | 邯豆13 | -1.186 | -0.494 | 0.114 | -0.635 | 39 |
21 | 山宁28 | -0.746 | -0.385 | 0.974 | -0.176 | 28 |
22 | 菏豆37 | -0.189 | -1.469 | -1.060 | -0.793 | 42 |
23 | 南农60 | -0.159 | -2.826 | 0.737 | -0.683 | 40 |
24 | 皖宿1019 | 0.712 | -0.582 | -1.365 | -0.222 | 31 |
25 | 郑1440 | 2.301 | -0.238 | 1.041 | 1.230 | 1 |
26 | 中豆4901 | -0.644 | 0.599 | 1.378 | 0.261 | 13 |
27 | 商豆151 | 1.267 | 0.743 | -0.360 | 0.676 | 6 |
28 | 宿豆051 | 0.797 | -1.095 | 0.220 | 0.097 | 19 |
29 | 冀1801 | 0.412 | 1.708 | -0.601 | 0.510 | 10 |
30 | 齐黄45 | 0.563 | 1.679 | -0.516 | 0.592 | 8 |
31 | 宿豆219 | 0.362 | -0.214 | -0.168 | 0.053 | 20 |
32 | 菏豆44 | -0.940 | 0.194 | -0.738 | -0.559 | 37 |
33 | 周豆41号 | 0.396 | -0.591 | 0.846 | 0.234 | 14 |
34 | 中黄207 | -0.342 | 0.707 | 0.298 | 0.133 | 18 |
35 | 菏豆39 | 0.290 | -0.948 | -0.355 | -0.241 | 32 |
36 | 淮豆16 | 1.476 | 0.295 | -1.504 | 0.330 | 12 |
37 | 徐豆24 | 0.393 | 0.643 | -1.165 | 0.043 | 22 |
38 | 周豆34号 | 2.080 | 0.924 | -0.121 | 1.152 | 2 |
39 | 皖宿061 | -0.983 | -0.179 | 0.790 | -0.272 | 33 |
40 | 皖宿112 | 0.125 | -0.355 | -0.164 | -0.091 | 26 |
41 | 中黄321 | -2.086 | 1.633 | 0.266 | -0.380 | 35 |
42 | 阜豆19 | -0.958 | 0.834 | 0.745 | 0.018 | 23 |
43 | 皖豆40 | -2.032 | 1.477 | 1.671 | -0.021 | 25 |
44 | 山宁27 | -2.092 | 0.933 | -1.536 | -1.072 | 46 |
45 | 圣豆106 | -1.256 | 0.063 | -1.415 | -0.920 | 44 |
46 | 圣豆21 | 0.747 | 1.159 | -0.061 | 0.647 | 7 |
Table 6 Principal component factor comprehensive scores of tested varieties
序号 Number | 品种 Variety | F1 | F2 | F3 | 综合得分 Overall ratings | 排名 Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 山宁23 | -0.925 | -0.850 | -0.389 | -0.758 | 41 |
2 | 华豆22 | 1.093 | -1.144 | -1.275 | -0.191 | 29 |
3 | 安豆115 | -0.085 | -0.936 | 1.631 | 0.135 | 17 |
4 | 邯豆15 | -0.462 | -1.622 | 1.742 | -0.199 | 30 |
5 | 皇豆12 | 0.354 | -0.590 | -0.590 | -0.173 | 27 |
6 | 潍豆1897 | -0.124 | 0.940 | -0.148 | 0.175 | 16 |
7 | 濮豆754 | 0.104 | 0.828 | -0.212 | 0.226 | 15 |
8 | 菏育10号 | -0.653 | -1.156 | -1.383 | -0.995 | 45 |
9 | 柳豆108 | -1.059 | -0.491 | 0.026 | -0.602 | 38 |
10 | 兴豆985 | -0.350 | 0.456 | -1.799 | -0.511 | 36 |
11 | 淮豆17 | 0.392 | 0.453 | 0.498 | 0.438 | 11 |
12 | 南农47 | 1.004 | 0.815 | 1.013 | 0.952 | 5 |
13 | 郓豆1号 | 0.845 | -0.649 | -0.669 | 0.006 | 24 |
14 | 濮豆5110 | 0.999 | 1.559 | 0.948 | 1.146 | 3 |
15 | 兴农豆2号 | -0.360 | -0.807 | 0.278 | -0.316 | 34 |
16 | 洛豆1305 | 0.786 | 0.358 | 0.257 | 0.520 | 9 |
17 | 恒豆6号 | 0.838 | -0.104 | 2.637 | 1.054 | 4 |
18 | 圣育6号 | -0.823 | -1.162 | -0.618 | -0.865 | 43 |
19 | 徐9416-8 | 0.119 | -0.112 | 0.102 | 0.048 | 21 |
20 | 邯豆13 | -1.186 | -0.494 | 0.114 | -0.635 | 39 |
21 | 山宁28 | -0.746 | -0.385 | 0.974 | -0.176 | 28 |
22 | 菏豆37 | -0.189 | -1.469 | -1.060 | -0.793 | 42 |
23 | 南农60 | -0.159 | -2.826 | 0.737 | -0.683 | 40 |
24 | 皖宿1019 | 0.712 | -0.582 | -1.365 | -0.222 | 31 |
25 | 郑1440 | 2.301 | -0.238 | 1.041 | 1.230 | 1 |
26 | 中豆4901 | -0.644 | 0.599 | 1.378 | 0.261 | 13 |
27 | 商豆151 | 1.267 | 0.743 | -0.360 | 0.676 | 6 |
28 | 宿豆051 | 0.797 | -1.095 | 0.220 | 0.097 | 19 |
29 | 冀1801 | 0.412 | 1.708 | -0.601 | 0.510 | 10 |
30 | 齐黄45 | 0.563 | 1.679 | -0.516 | 0.592 | 8 |
31 | 宿豆219 | 0.362 | -0.214 | -0.168 | 0.053 | 20 |
32 | 菏豆44 | -0.940 | 0.194 | -0.738 | -0.559 | 37 |
33 | 周豆41号 | 0.396 | -0.591 | 0.846 | 0.234 | 14 |
34 | 中黄207 | -0.342 | 0.707 | 0.298 | 0.133 | 18 |
35 | 菏豆39 | 0.290 | -0.948 | -0.355 | -0.241 | 32 |
36 | 淮豆16 | 1.476 | 0.295 | -1.504 | 0.330 | 12 |
37 | 徐豆24 | 0.393 | 0.643 | -1.165 | 0.043 | 22 |
38 | 周豆34号 | 2.080 | 0.924 | -0.121 | 1.152 | 2 |
39 | 皖宿061 | -0.983 | -0.179 | 0.790 | -0.272 | 33 |
40 | 皖宿112 | 0.125 | -0.355 | -0.164 | -0.091 | 26 |
41 | 中黄321 | -2.086 | 1.633 | 0.266 | -0.380 | 35 |
42 | 阜豆19 | -0.958 | 0.834 | 0.745 | 0.018 | 23 |
43 | 皖豆40 | -2.032 | 1.477 | 1.671 | -0.021 | 25 |
44 | 山宁27 | -2.092 | 0.933 | -1.536 | -1.072 | 46 |
45 | 圣豆106 | -1.256 | 0.063 | -1.415 | -0.920 | 44 |
46 | 圣豆21 | 0.747 | 1.159 | -0.061 | 0.647 | 7 |
Fig.1 Cluster analysis of 46 soybean varieties(lines) based on 9 agronomic traits(left picture) and principal component analysis comprehensive score(right picture)
[1] |
Kim H, Xing G n, Wang Y F, et al. Constitution of resistance to common cutworm in terms of antibiosis and antixenosis in soybean RIL populations[J]. Euphytica, 2014, 196:137-154.
DOI URL |
[2] | 王连铮, 王岚, 赵荣娟, 等. 关于发展黄淮海地区大豆生产和育种问题[J]. 中国种业, 2002,(10):4-7. |
WANG Lianzheng, WANG Lan, ZHAO Rongjuan, et al. On the development of soybean production and breeding in the Huanghuahai area[J]. China Seed Industry, 2002,(10):4-7. | |
[3] | 韩秉进, 潘相文, 金剑, 等. 大豆农艺及产量性状的主成分分析[J]. 大豆科学, 2008, 27(1):67-73. |
HAN Bingjin, PAN Xiangwen, JIN Jian, et al. Principal Component Analysis of Agronomic and Yield-related Traits in Soybean[J]. Soybean Science, 2008, 27(1):67-73. | |
[4] | 余继忠. 福鼎大白茶半同胞系和云南大叶茶半同胞系遗传多样性和亲缘关系研究[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2010. |
YU Jizhong. Genetic Diversity and Relationship of Half-sib Tea Cultivars Related to Fuding Dabaicha and Yunnan Dayecha[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2010. | |
[5] |
周波, 江海东, 张秀新, 等. 部分引进牡丹品种的形态多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2011, 19(5):543-550.
DOI |
ZHOU Bo, JIANG Haidong, ZHANG Xiuxin, et al. Morphological diversity of some introduced tree peony cultivars[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2011, 19(5):543-550.
DOI |
|
[6] | 何继红, 董孔军, 刘敏轩, 等. 甘肃省新征集高粱地方品种资源的鉴定与遗传多样性评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2015, 16(3):479-484. |
HE Jihong, DONG Kongjun, LIU Minxuan, ea al. Identification and Genetic Diversity Evaluation of New-collective Germplasm of Sorghum in Gansu Province[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2015, 16(3):479-484. | |
[7] | 汪宝卿, 张礼凤, 戴海英, 等. 黄淮海地区夏大豆农艺性状的遗传变异、相关及主成分分析[J]. 大豆科学, 2012, 31(2):208-212. |
WANG Baoqing, ZHANG Lifeng, DAI Haiying, et al. Genetic Variation, Correlation and Principal Component Analysis on Agronomic Traits of Summer Sowing Soybean(Glycine max Merr.)in Huanghuai Region[J]. Soybean Science, 2012, 31(2):208-212. | |
[8] | 林文磊, 吕美琴, 李明松, 等. 39份春大豆种质资源的主成分分析及其聚类分析[J]. 福建农业学报, 2018, 33(10):1016-1022. |
LIN Wenlei, LÜ Meiqin, LI Mingsong, et al. Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis of 39 Spring Soybean Germplasm Resources[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(10):1016-1022. | |
[9] | 常世豪, 杨青春, 舒文涛, 等. 黄淮海夏大豆品种(系)主要农艺性状的综合性分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2020,(3):66-72. |
CHANG Shihao, YANG Qingchun, SHU Wentao, et al. Comprehensive Analysis of Main Agronomic Traits of Summer Sowing Soybean Varieties (Lines) in Huang-Huai-Hai Region[J]. Crops, 2020,(3):66-72. | |
[10] | 李向华, 常汝镇. 中国春大豆品种聚类分析及主成分分析[J]. 作物学报, 1998, 24(3):325-332. |
LI Xianghua, CHAO Ruzhen. Cluster and Principal Component Analysis of the Spring Soybean Varieties in China[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1998, 24(3):325-332. | |
[11] | 王平, 徐加利, 闫保罗, 等. 基于主成分-聚类-逐步回归分析的夏玉米品种光温利用能力综合评价[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(10):71-77. |
WANG Ping, XU Jiali, YAN Baoluo, et al. Comprehensive Evaluation on Light and Temperature Utilization Ability of Different Summer Maize Varieties Based on Principal Component, Cluster and Stepwise Regression Analyses[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 52(10):71-77. | |
[12] | 冯海萍, 苏存录, 谢华, 等. 基于主成分分析的宁南山区露地栽培小型甘蓝品种的综合评价[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2020, 33(11):68-71,76. |
FENG Haiping, SU Cunlu, XIE Hua, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of different miniature cabbage varieties in the mountainous area of southern Ningxia based on principal components analysis[J]. Chinese Melon, 2020, 33(11):68-71,76. | |
[13] | 王彦花, 张云, 王容, 等. 基于主成分分析的茶油品质综合评价研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2019, 39(6):45-51. |
WANG Yanhua, ZHANG Yun, WANG Rong, et al. Research on comprehensive evaluation of Camellia oil quality based on principal component analysis[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2019, 39(6):45-51. | |
[14] | 都真真, 李锡香, 宋江萍, 等. 228份引进大蒜资源的表型多样性分析及适应性初步评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20(5):1186-1196. |
DU Zhenzhen, LI Xixiang, SONG Jiangping, et al. Phenotypic Diversity and Adaptability of 228 Accessions of Introduced Garlic Genetic Resources[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2019, 20(5):1186-1196. | |
[15] | 樊树雷, 李和孟, 邱宝财, 等. 基于主成分及聚类分析的10个杨梅品种生产性状综合评价[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(14):170-173. |
FAN Shulei, LI Hemeng, QIU Baocai, et al. Comprehensive Evaluation of Evaluation of Production Traits of 10 Bayberry Varieties Based on Component and Cluster Analysis[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(14):170-173. | |
[16] | 邱丽娟, 常汝镇, 等. 大豆种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006. |
QIU Lijuan, CHANG Ruzhen, et al. Description and data standards for soybean germplasm resources [M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006. | |
[17] | 南铭, 赵桂琴, 柴继宽. 黄土高原半干旱区饲用燕麦种质表型性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 25(6):1197-1205. |
NAN Ming, ZHAO Guiqin, CHAI Jikuan. Phenotypic Diversity and Comprehensive Evaluations of Avena sativa L. Gernplasm in Semi-arid Area of the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2017, 25(6):1197-1205. | |
[18] | Zheng D S, Wang X M, Zhang J. Oat germplasm resource description specification and data standard[J]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2006:10-45. |
[19] | 杨春杰, 陈佳琴, 黄建斌, 等. 贵州112份引进大豆资源的遗传多态性[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2015, 43(12):1-5. |
YANG Chunjie, CHEN Jiaqin, HUANG Jianbin, et al. Genetic Diversity of 112 Introduced Soybean Germplasm Resources in Guizhou[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 43(12):1-5. | |
[20] | 张鹏. 基于主成分分析的综合评价研究[D]. 南京:南京理工大学, 2004:5-58. |
ZHANG Peng. Comprehensive evaluation research based on principal component analysis[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2004:5-58. | |
[21] | 余飞, 王友华, 许海涛, 等. 黄淮海大豆区试品种主要农艺性状的多元相关分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2008,(10):41-44. |
YU Fei, WANG Youhua, XU Haitao, et al. Multivariate Correlation Analyses of Main Agronomic Characters of Soybean Varieties in Huanghuaihai Region[J]. Henan Agicultural Sciences, 2008,(10):41-44. | |
[22] | 汪宝卿, 张礼凤, 慈敦伟, 等. 黄淮海地区夏大豆农艺性状与产量的相关性及灰色关联度分析[J]. 山东农业科学, 2010,(3):20-25. |
WANG Baoqing, ZHANG Lifeng, CI Dunwei, et al. Correlation and Grey Relation Analysis of Agronomic Traits with Yield of Summer Soybean in the Huanghuaihai Area[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2010,(3):20-25. | |
[23] | 汪宝卿, 张礼凤, 慈敦伟, 等. 黄淮海地区夏大豆农艺性状与产量的多元回归和通径分析[J]. 大豆科学, 2010, 29(2):255-259. |
WANG Baoqing, ZHANG Lifeng, CI Dunwei, et al. Multiple Regression and Path Analysis between Agronomic Traits and Yield of Summer Sowing Soybean(Glycine max Merr.) in Huanghuai River Region[J]. Soybean Science, 2010, 29(2):255-259. | |
[24] | 史京京, 薛盈文, 郭伟, 等. 黑龙江西部地区引进的饲用燕麦种质资源遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 南方农业学报, 2019, 50(3):515-523. |
SHI Jingjing, XUE Yingwen, GUO Wei, et al. Genetic diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation of introduced Avena sativa L. germplasm resources in the western area of Heilongjiang[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2019, 50(3):515-523. | |
[25] | 赵朝森, 王瑞珍, 李英慧. 江西大豆种质资源表型及品质性状综合分析与评价[J]. 大豆科学, 2019, 38(5):686-693. |
ZHAO Chaosen, WANG Ruizhen, LIYinghui. Comprehensive analysis and evaluation of phenotype and quality character of soybean germplasm resources in Jiangxi[J]. Soybean Science, 2019, 38(5):686-693. | |
[26] | 赵斌, 陈晓东, 季昌好, 等. 111份多棱大麦种质主要农艺性状的遗传多样性[J]. 大麦与谷类科学, 2020, 37(5):1-7. |
ZHAO Bin, CHEN Xiaodong, JI Changhao, et al. Analysis of the Genetic Diversity of the Main Agronomic Traits of 111 Multi-rowed Barley Germplasm Accessions[J]. Barley and Cereal Sciences, 2020, 37(5):1-7. |
[1] | LIU Jing, DU Mingchuan, ZHANG Wenting, BAO Haijuan, JING Meiling, DU Wenhua. Screening of triticale germplasm in different areas of Qinghai [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2183-2190. |
[2] | LIU Huijie, WANG Junhao, GONG Zhaolong, LIANG Yajun, WANG Junduo, LI Xueyuan, ZHENG Juyun, WANG Jichuan. Identification of salt tolerance of 197 upland cotton varieties at germination stage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1574-1581. |
[3] | Abudukadier Kurban, PAN Jinghai, CHEN Youqiang, LIU Huajun, DONG Xinjiu, BAI Xiaoshan, LI Sizhong, GAO Weishi, LI Xiaohui. Comprehensive evaluation of adaptability of late sowing sugar-beet varieties based on yield correlation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1368-1377. |
[4] | YANG Junyan, YAN Miao, WU Haibo, YANG Wenli, WANG Haojie, MAO Jiancai, ZHAI Wenqiang, LI Junhua. The impact of high temperature on different thick -skinned melon varieties and comprehensive evaluation of its heat resistance [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1386-1396. |
[5] | ZHU Tao, Lei Qingyuan, MA Liang. Effects of water and nitrogen on growth, yield and water and nitrogen utilization efficiency of resown Maize and verification of scheme optimization model [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 835-844. |
[6] | GAO Mutian, XIAO Yanmei, LIAO Zhijie, HUANG Cheng. Comprehensive evaluation of kernel and quality traits in maize-teosinte introgression line population [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 885-891. |
[7] | Mahemuti Abulaiti, Muhetaer zhare, Mireguli Waili, Hadier Yishake. Correlation and regression analysis between leaf margin scorch diseases and leaf nutrient content of walnut [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 945-953. |
[8] | YANG Minghua, LIAO Biyong, LIU Qiang, FENG Guorui, Dawulai Jiekeshan, Buayixiamu Namanti, LIU Qi, Aierjuma Tuluhan, PENG Yuncheng. Comprehensive evaluation of dehydration of maize hybrid combinations based on principal component analysis [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 318-325. |
[9] | WANG Jijiao, PAN Yue, WANG Shiwei, HAN Zhengwei, MA Yong, HU Haifang, WANG Baoqing. Canonical correlation analysis of soil nutrients and the quality of Beibinghong grape juice [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 355-364. |
[10] | OU Yuan, LUO Shasha, WANG Ruyue, SUN Yali, HU Haifang. Effects of salt stress on the growth and physiological characteristics of american black walnut seedlings [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 393-401. |
[11] | YANG Cunming, ZHANG Xiaoxue, ZHANG Menghua, ZHAO Zhiwen, LI Fengjie, HUANG Xixia, LI Jie, Aizimaiti Awuti, HE Junmin, LI Xue, LI Tingting, TANG Li, ZHANG Wenjing, TIAN Yuezhen, TIAN Kechuan. Analysis of correlation and difference of target traits in fine wool sheep breeding [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 514-520. |
[12] | HAO Xiyu, LIU Tingting, WANG Hui, LENG Jingwen, GONG Shihang, LIU Wei, LIANG Jie. Comprehensive evaluation of foxtail millet varieties based on entropy weight method and grey relational analysis [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 2902-2912. |
[13] | YANG Xiangbo, CHEN Liangyu, YANG Songnan, CHEN Xifeng, XING Weiming, LI Xueying, CONG Weixuan, ZANG Zhenyuan, ZANG Yuanbo, ZHANG Jun. Phenotype analysis and comprehensive evaluation of spring soybean germplasm resources from northeast China [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 2921-2933. |
[14] | LI Chunyu, TAN Zhanming, CHENG Yunxia, GAO Yuan, MA Quanhui, LI Zhiguo, MA Xing. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on diurnal changes of chlorophyll content and photosynthetic characteristics of sand-cultivated tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 3006-3013. |
[15] | XU Bin, WANG Zheng, SONG Zhanteng, Merhaba Paerhati, ZHU Jingrong, CHE Fengbin, LI Yonghai, WU Fengyan, MIAO Fuhong. Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of the fruit quality of 11 wild seabuckthorn germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 3020-3031. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||