Effects of chemical fertilizers with compound microbial fertilizers on soil nutrients and enzyme activities

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.06.021

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 Investigate the effects of applying different ratios of compound microbial fertilizers on the soil nutrients and soil enzyme activities of planting cabbage, as well as to provide theoretical guidance for the application of new compound microbial fertilizers to cabbage planting, field experiments were conducted. 【Methods】 A total of six treatments were set up including CK control (chemical fertilizer alone), T₁ (chemical fertilizer + compound microbial fertilizer 20%), T₂ (chemical fertilizer + compound microbial fertilizer 40%), T₃ (chemical fertilizer + compound microbial fertilizer 60%), T₄ (chemical fertilizer + compound microbial fertilizer 80%), and T₅ (chemical fertilizer + compound microbial fertilizer 100%) and the changes of soil pH value, organic matter, and soil total nutrient content of cabbage were investigated and soil peroxidase, urease, alkaline phosphatase and sucrase among different treatments were studied. 【Results】 Compared with CK treatment, the application of different ratios of composite microbial fertilizers could effectively increase the content of organic matter, total nitrogen, total phosphorus and total potassium in cabbage soil, the size order between the treatments: treatment T₅> T₄> T₃> T₂> T₁> CK. They could effectively maintain the soil acidity and alkalinity, the pH value range between 7.75 and 8.01. And the difference between the CK treatment and the other T₅ treatments was significant (P < 0.05). 【Conclusion】 Compound microbial fertilizer can reduce soil pH value, significantly increase the nutrient content of the soil, and affect soil enzyme activity, of which T₅ treatment has the best effect. The use of chemical fertilizers with compound microbial fertilizer planting cabbage can achieve good results.

Key words: compound microbial fertilizer; Chinese cabbage; soil enzyme activity; soil nutrients; soil pH

摘要：

【目的】探究施用不同比例复合微生物肥料对种植小白菜土壤养分和土壤酶活性的影响,为新型复合微生物肥料应用于小白菜种植提供理论指导。【方法】设置田间试验,共设6个处理:CK对照(单施化肥)、T₁(化肥+复合微生物肥20%)、T₂(化肥+复合微生物肥40%)、T₃(化肥+复合微生物肥60%)、T₄(化肥+复合微生物肥80%)、T₅(化肥+复合微生物肥100%),分析小白菜土壤pH值、有机质和土壤全养分含量的变化及土壤过氧化氢酶、脲酶、碱性磷酸酶和蔗糖酶在不同处理间的变化。【结果】与CK处理相比,施不同比例的复合微生物肥料可有效提高小白菜土壤有机质、全氮、全磷和全钾含量,各处理之间大小顺序处理T₅> T₄> T₃> T₂> T₁> CK。可有效保持土壤酸碱度,pH值7.75~8.01。CK处理与T₅处理之间差异显著(P<0.05)。【结论】复合微生物肥料可降低土壤酸碱度,显著提高土壤的养分含量,影响土壤酶活性,其中T₅处理的效果最佳,使用化肥配施复合微生物肥料种植小白菜效果佳。

关键词: 复合微生物肥料, 小白菜, 土壤酶活性, 土壤养分, 土壤酸碱度

CLC Number:

Kongdusi Paerhati, SI Yan'e, Tuerxun Tuerhong, Aikebaier Yilahong. Effects of chemical fertilizers with compound microbial fertilizers on soil nutrients and enzyme activities[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(6): 1488-1495.

孔都斯·帕尔哈提, 司艳娥, 吐尔逊·吐尔洪, 艾克拜尔·伊拉洪. 化肥配施复合微生物肥料对土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(6): 1488-1495.

Figures/Tables 7

References 31

[1]	吴瑕, 周浩楠, 刘德阳, 等. 有机肥与生物炭对小白菜光合作用及硝酸盐积累的影响[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2023, 54(4): 403-412.
	WU Xia, ZHOU Haonan, LIU Deyang, et al. Effects of organic fertilizer and biochar on photosynthesis and nitrate accumulation in Chinese cabbage[J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2023, 54(4): 403-412.
[2]	吴增凤, 何嘉欣, 戴曲顺. 复合微生物菌肥对小白菜产量及经济效益的影响[J]. 东南园艺, 2021, 9(1): 23-26.
	WU Zengfeng, HE Jiaxin, DAI Qushun. Effect of compound microbial fertilizer on yield and economic benefits in Brassica chinensis[J]. Southeast Horticulture, 2021, 9(1): 23-26.
[3]	陆丽华, 查金芳, 张文滔, 等. 生物炭对小白菜产量与品质的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2022,(15): 84-86, 90.
	LU Lihua, ZHA Jinfang, ZHANG Wentao, et al. Effect of biochar on yield and quality of Brassica chinensis L[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022,(15): 84-86, 90.
[4]	付浩然, 李婷玉, 曹寒冰, 等. 我国化肥减量增效的驱动因素探究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(3): 561-580.
	FU Haoran, LI Tingyu, CAO Hanbing, et al. Research on the driving factors of fertilizer reduction in China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(3): 561-580.
[5]	Guo J H, Liu X J, Zhang Y, et al. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands[J]. Science, 2010, 327(5968): 1008-1010.
[6]	刘钦普. 中国化肥施用强度及环境安全阈值时空变化[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(6): 214-221.
	LIU Qinpu. Spatio-temporal changes of fertilization intensity and environmental safety threshold in China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(6): 214-221.
[7]	祝海燕. 过量施肥对设施果菜类蔬菜的影响——以山东省寿光市为例[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2018, 31(11): 50-52.
	ZHU Haiyan. The effect of excessive fertilization on facility fruit and vegetable vegetables--taking Shouguang City, Shandong Province as an example[J]. China Cucurbits and Vegetables, 2018, 31(11): 50-52.
[8]	王素英, 陶光灿, 谢光辉, 等. 我国微生物肥料的应用研究进展[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2003, 8(1): 14-18.
	WANG Suying, TAO Guangcan, XIE Guanghui, et al. A review of effects of biofertilizers on crop yield and quality[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2003, 8(1): 14-18.
[9]	师海斌, 马亚军, 张璐, 等. 减量施氮配施复合微生物肥料对旱地苹果产量、品质的影响[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2023, 69(2): 87-91, 104.
	SHI Haibin, MA Yajun, ZHANG Lu, et al. Effects of nitrogen reduction and combined application of compound microbial fertilizer on apple yield and quality in dryland[J]. Shaanxi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 69(2): 87-91, 104.
[10]	郑立伟, 闫洪波, 张丽, 等. 微生物肥料发展及作用机理综述[J]. 河北省科学院学报, 2020, 37(1): 61-67.
	ZHENG Liwei, YAN Hongbo, ZHANG Li, et al. A review on development and mechanism of microbial fertilizer[J]. Journal of the Hebei Academy of Sciences, 2020, 37(1): 61-67.
[11]	葛均青, 于贤昌, 王竹红. 微生物肥料效应及其应用展望[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2003, 11(3): 87-88.
	GE Junqing, YU Xianchang, WANG Zhuhong. The function of microbial fertilizer and its application prospects[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2003, 11(3): 87-88.
[12]	郑琳. 菌肥对茶园土壤氮磷淋溶及酶活性和微生物的影响[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2018.
	ZHENG Lin. Effects of bacterial fertilizer on nitrogen and phosphorus leaching and enzyme activity and microorganisms in tea garden soil[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2018.
[13]	宋玉珍. 微生物肥料在松嫩平原盐碱地造林中的应用研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2009.
	SONG Yuzhen. Application of microbial fertilizers in afforestation of saline and alkaline land in Songnen Plain[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2009.
[14]	罗玉兰, 田龚, 张冬梅, 等. 微生物菌剂对连栋大棚土壤养分及硝态氮累积的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(13): 224-228.
	LUO Yulan, TIAN Gong, ZHANG Dongmei, et al. Effects of biological bacterial manure on soil nutrient and nitrate-N accumulation in greenhouse[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(13): 224-228.
[15]	卢慧, 丛静, 刘晓, 等. 三江源区高寒草甸植物多样性的海拔分布格局[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(7):197-204.
	LU Hui, CONG Jing, LIU Xiao, et al. Elevational distribution pattern of plant diversity in alpine meadows in the Sanjiangyuan area[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(7):197-204.
[16]	范洁群, 褚长彬, 吴淑杭, 等. 不同微生物菌肥对桃园土壤微生物活性和果实品质的影响[J]. 上海农业学报, 2013, 29(1): 51-54.
	FAN Jiequn, CHU Changbin, WU Shuhang, et al. Effects of bio-fertilizers on soil microbes and fruit quality of peach[J]. Acta Agriculturae Shanghai, 2013, 29(1): 51-54.
[17]	王文庆, 史清亮, 白建军, 等. 微生物肥料对山药土壤生态特征及病情指数的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2010, 38(12): 37-39, 56.
	WANG Wenqing, SHI Qingliang, BAI Jianjun, et al. Effects of microbial fertilizers on the ecological characteristics of soil in the Chinese yam field and disease index[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 38(12): 37-39, 56.
[18]	关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1986: 274-232.
	GUAN Songyin. Soil enzymes and their research methods[M]. Beijing: Agriculture Press, 1986: 274-232.
[19]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
	BAO Shidan. Soil Agrochemical Analysis[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000.
[20]	黄会前, 张慧, 胡震, 等. 贵州山区耕地土壤有机质及pH的空间分布与影响因素研究[J/OL]. 西南农业学报:1-9[2023-10-19].
	HUANG Huizhan, ZHANG Hui, HU Zhen, et al. Study on the spatial distribution and influencing factors of soil organic matter and pH in cropland in mountainous areas of Guizhou[J/OL]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences:1-9[2023-10-19].
[21]	吴凤云, 崔秀明, 杨野, 等. 不同施肥处理调节土壤pH值对三七发病率及其生长的影响[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(5): 908-914.
	WU Fengyun, CUI Xiuming, YANG Ye, et al. Effects of soil pH values regulated by different fertilization on the disease incidence and growth of Panax Notoginseng[J]. Journal of Yunnan University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2017, 39(5): 908-914.
[22]	崔彩秀. 微生物肥料对土壤的改良以及在农作物生产中的应用[J]. 河北农机, 2023,(9): 115-117.
	CUI Caixiu. Improvement of soil by microbial fertilizer and its application in crop[J]. Hebei Agricultural Machinery, 2023,(9): 115-117.
[23]	刘军辉. 复合微生物制剂对盐碱地土壤修复效果研究[J]. 河北林业科技, 2016,(3): 43-45.
	LIU Junhui. Complex microbial agents on saline-alkali soil restoration effect research[J]. The Journal of Hebei Forestry Science and Technology, 2016,(3): 43-45.
[24]	彭言劼, 宋春草, 康颖, 等. 竹纤维微生物肥对‘巨峰’葡萄发育和土壤养分的影响[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2021,(4):45-49.
	PENG Yanjie, SONG Chuncao, KANG Ying et al. Effects of bamboo fiber microbial fertilizer on the development and soil nutrients of 'Jumbo' grapes[J]. Sino-Overseas Grapevine & Wine, 2021,(4):45-49.
[25]	付文杰. 不同施肥处理对小白菜生长、产量和品质的影响[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2019.
	FU Wenjie. Effects of different fertilization treatments on growth, yield and quality of Chinese cabbage[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2019.
[26]	张国江, 袁晓明, 蔡明清, 等. 基施微生物肥对水稻产量及土壤养分的影响[J]. 上海农业科技, 2021,(4): 109-110, 112.
	ZHANG Guojiang, YUAN Xiaoming, CAI Mingqing, et al. Effects of basal application of microbial fertilizer on rice yield and soil nutrients[J]. Shanghai Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021,(4): 109-110, 112.
[27]	田效琴, 贾会娟, 熊瑛, 等. 保护性耕作下蚕豆生育期土壤有机碳、氮含量变化与分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(5): 1132-1141.
	TIAN Xiaoqin, JIA Huijuan, XIONG Ying, et al. Changes and distribution characteristics of contents of soil organic carbon and nitrogen in broad bean growth period under conservation tillage[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019, 28(5): 1132-1141.
[28]	胡铁军, 张怀杰, 魏杰, 等. 微生物肥对小麦产量、赤霉病以及土壤养分的影响[J]. 大麦与谷类科学, 2021, 38(5): 48-51.
	HU Tiejun, ZHANG Huaijie, WEI Jie, et al. Effects of microbial fertilizer on wheat yield, Fusarium head blight, and soil nutrients[J]. Barley and Cereal Sciences, 2021, 38(5): 48-51.
[29]	宋以玲, 马学文, 于建, 等. 复合微生物肥料替代部分复合肥对花生生长及根际土壤微生物和理化性质的影响[J]. 山东科学, 2019, 32(1): 38-45, 123.
	SONG Yiling, MA Xuewen, YU Jian, et al. Effects of compound fertilizer partly replaced by compound microbial fertilizer on growth of peanut, microorganism and physicochemical properties in rhizosphere soil[J]. Shandong Science, 2019, 32(1): 38-45, 123.
[30]	杨瑒, 靳学慧, 周燕, 等. 施氮量对寒区盐碱地马铃薯生育期土壤微生物数量和酶活性的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2014,(3): 32-37.
	YANG Yang, JIN Xuehui, ZHOU Yan, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rate on the microorganism and soil enzyme activities with different growth stages of potato plant in the cold saline-alkali soil[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2014,(3): 32-37.
[31]	Chen L, Wang X B, Zhou W, et al. Responses of crop yields, soil enzymatic activities, and microbial communities to different long-term organic materials applied with chemical fertilizer in purple soil[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2021, 105: 103319.

处理 Treatments	株高 Plant height (cm)	叶长 Leaf length (cm)	叶宽 Leaf width (cm)	叶片数/片 Number of blades (piece)	叶面积 Leaf area (cm²)
CK	18.53±0.21^d	13.02±0.33^e	6.85±0.11^c	7.87±0.31^c	58.89±1.47^e
T₁	19.93±0.10^c	13.47±0.33^de	7.23±0.09^b	8.43±0.21^b	64.22±0.87^d
T₂	20.12±0.10^c	13.76±0.18^d	9.05±0.33^b	8.43±0.12^b	82.16±2.37^c
T₃	21.07±0.58^b	14.35±0.19^c	9.12±0.21^b	8.47±0.12^b	86.37±3.02^bc
T₄	21.47±0.11^b	14.85±0.20^b	9.27±0.33^b	8.73±0.12^ab	90.92±3.86^b
T₅	22.69±0.48^a	15.43±0.14^a	10.32±0.37^a	8.87±0.21^a	105.05±2.83^a

处理 Treatments	株高 Plant height (cm)	叶长 Leaf length (cm)	叶宽 Leaf width (cm)	叶片数/片 Number of blades (piece)	叶面积 Leaf area (cm²)
CK	18.53±0.21^d	13.02±0.33^e	6.85±0.11^c	7.87±0.31^c	58.89±1.47^e
T₁	19.93±0.10^c	13.47±0.33^de	7.23±0.09^b	8.43±0.21^b	64.22±0.87^d
T₂	20.12±0.10^c	13.76±0.18^d	9.05±0.33^b	8.43±0.12^b	82.16±2.37^c
T₃	21.07±0.58^b	14.35±0.19^c	9.12±0.21^b	8.47±0.12^b	86.37±3.02^bc
T₄	21.47±0.11^b	14.85±0.20^b	9.27±0.33^b	8.73±0.12^ab	90.92±3.86^b
T₅	22.69±0.48^a	15.43±0.14^a	10.32±0.37^a	8.87±0.21^a	105.05±2.83^a

处理 Treatments	苗期 Seedling stage	中期 Midterm	收获期 Harvest time
CK	7.87±0.07^bc	7.92±0.09^a	7.98±0.04^a
T₁	7.92±0.02^b	7.90±0.05^a	7.89±0.07^ab
T₂	7.87±0.02^bc	7.90±0.04^a	7.83±0.08^b
T₃	7.93±0.06^b	7.87±0.06^a	7.89±0.05^ab
T₄	7.78±0.15^bc	7.83±0.10^a	7.82±0.07^b
T₅	7.72±0.06^c	7.87±0.05^a	7.87±0.08^ab

处理 Treatments	苗期 Seedling stage	中期 Midterm	收获期 Harvest time
CK	7.87±0.07^bc	7.92±0.09^a	7.98±0.04^a
T₁	7.92±0.02^b	7.90±0.05^a	7.89±0.07^ab
T₂	7.87±0.02^bc	7.90±0.04^a	7.83±0.08^b
T₃	7.93±0.06^b	7.87±0.06^a	7.89±0.05^ab
T₄	7.78±0.15^bc	7.83±0.10^a	7.82±0.07^b
T₅	7.72±0.06^c	7.87±0.05^a	7.87±0.08^ab

处理 Treat- ments	w土壤有机质 Organic matter content ( g/kg)	w土壤全氮 Total N content ( g/kg)	w土壤全磷 Total P content (g/kg)	w土壤全钾 Total K content (mg/kg)
CK	32.88±0.45^e	1.09±0.50^d	2.58±0.23^bc	9.91±0.55^e
T₁	34.77±0.21^d	1.02±0.20^d	2.85±0.59^b	12.06±0.27^d
T₂	35.69±0.40^cd	1.18±0.15^cd	2.96±0.53^b	12.51±0.14^cd
T₃	36.45±0.18^c	1.27±0.35^bc	2.94±0.25^b	13.02±0.15^bc
T₄	37.88±0.28^b	1.36±0.20^b	3.01±0.33^a	13.46±0.26^ab
T₅	41.56±0.08^a	1.40±0.40^b	3.05±0.08^a	13.71±0.26^a