Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (8): 1904-1912.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.08.011
• Horticultural Special Local Products · Agricultural Product Processing Engineering • Previous Articles Next Articles
XIAO Lele1,2(), LI Zhiqiang1(
), YE Jun2, PU Min2, RUAN Xiangyang2, LIU Huaijin1,2
Received:
2022-11-09
Online:
2023-08-20
Published:
2023-08-14
Correspondence author:
LI Zhiqiang (1982 -), male, master, associate researcher, nutrition and fertilization of fruit trees, (E-mail)sars5015@163.comSupported by:
肖乐乐1,2(), 李志强1(
), 冶军2, 蒲敏2, 阮向阳2, 刘怀金1,2
通讯作者:
李志强(1982-),男,河北新乐人,副研究员,硕士,研究方向为果树营养与施肥,(E-mail)sars5015@163.com作者简介:
肖乐乐(1998-),女,河南驻马店人,硕士研究生,研究方向为土壤肥料,(E-mail)xiaolele1117shz@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
XIAO Lele, LI Zhiqiang, YE Jun, PU Min, RUAN Xiangyang, LIU Huaijin. Effects of combined application of peptide fertilizer and magnesium on quality and yield of suntianni seedless grape[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1904-1912.
肖乐乐, 李志强, 冶军, 蒲敏, 阮向阳, 刘怀金. 肽肥与镁配施对森田尼无核葡萄品质和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1904-1912.
处理 Treatments | 浓度 Concentration(%) |
---|---|
清水CK Clean water | - |
多肽肥P Peptide fertilizer | 0.10 |
硫酸镁Mg Magnesium sulfate | 0.30 |
肽肥+硫酸镁P+Mg Peptide fertilizer+Magnesium sulfate | 0.10+0.30 |
氨基酸肥料AA Amino acid fertilizer | 0.15 |
氨基酸+硫酸镁AA+Mg Amino acid+Magnesium sulfate | 0.15+0.30 |
Tab.1 treatment concentration
处理 Treatments | 浓度 Concentration(%) |
---|---|
清水CK Clean water | - |
多肽肥P Peptide fertilizer | 0.10 |
硫酸镁Mg Magnesium sulfate | 0.30 |
肽肥+硫酸镁P+Mg Peptide fertilizer+Magnesium sulfate | 0.10+0.30 |
氨基酸肥料AA Amino acid fertilizer | 0.15 |
氨基酸+硫酸镁AA+Mg Amino acid+Magnesium sulfate | 0.15+0.30 |
Fig.1 Chlorophyll content of grape leaves with different treatments Note: The chlorophyll content of leaves was measured on the 10th day after the third foliar fertilization treatment
Fig.2 Photosynthetic parameters of grape leaves with different treatments Note: The photosynthetic parameters of leaves were measured on the 10th day after the third foliar fertilization treatment
处理 Treatments | 氮 Nitrogen (mg/g) | 磷 Phosphorus (mg/g) | 钾 Potassium (mg/g) | 镁 Magnesium (mg/g) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
枝 Branch | 清水CK | 12.67±0.1b | 4.15±0.2b | 18.22±0.15a | 104.71±2.08a |
肽肥P | 15.16±0.47a | 4.88±0.26a | 18.11±0.65a | 102.58±3.52a | |
硫酸镁Mg | 13.02±0.52b | 4.18±0.18b | 18.33±0.11a | 106.15±7.74a | |
肽肥+硫酸镁P+Mg | 14.72±0.24a | 4.99±0.14a | 18.64±0.19a | 104.62±3.41a | |
氨基酸肥料AA | 14.32±0.14a | 4.48±0.19b | 18.62±0.13a | 106.53±8.36a | |
氨基酸+硫酸镁AA+Mg | 13.02±0.52b | 4.34±0.12b | 18.60±0.13a | 110.66±5.24a | |
叶 Leaf | 清水CK | 13.45±0.4d | 12.51±0.32a | 13.45±0.27a | 68.96±1.96c |
肽肥P | 15.07±0.83ab | 11.78±0.18ab | 13.50±0.34a | 73.24±1.51b | |
硫酸镁Mg | 13.80±0.34cd | 10.49±1.17cd | 12.60±0.18c | 83.75±1.85a | |
肽肥+硫酸镁P+Mg | 14.52±0.41bc | 11.08±0.73bc | 12.19±0.04c | 82.07±2.54a | |
氨基酸肥料AA | 15.59±0.43a | 11.13±0.46bc | 13.85±0.2a | 70.87±1.60bc | |
氨基酸+硫酸镁AA+Mg | 13.09±0.54d | 9.82±0.44d | 12.89±0.46b | 83.76±2.04a |
Tab.2 Nutrient content of grape shoots with different treatments
处理 Treatments | 氮 Nitrogen (mg/g) | 磷 Phosphorus (mg/g) | 钾 Potassium (mg/g) | 镁 Magnesium (mg/g) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
枝 Branch | 清水CK | 12.67±0.1b | 4.15±0.2b | 18.22±0.15a | 104.71±2.08a |
肽肥P | 15.16±0.47a | 4.88±0.26a | 18.11±0.65a | 102.58±3.52a | |
硫酸镁Mg | 13.02±0.52b | 4.18±0.18b | 18.33±0.11a | 106.15±7.74a | |
肽肥+硫酸镁P+Mg | 14.72±0.24a | 4.99±0.14a | 18.64±0.19a | 104.62±3.41a | |
氨基酸肥料AA | 14.32±0.14a | 4.48±0.19b | 18.62±0.13a | 106.53±8.36a | |
氨基酸+硫酸镁AA+Mg | 13.02±0.52b | 4.34±0.12b | 18.60±0.13a | 110.66±5.24a | |
叶 Leaf | 清水CK | 13.45±0.4d | 12.51±0.32a | 13.45±0.27a | 68.96±1.96c |
肽肥P | 15.07±0.83ab | 11.78±0.18ab | 13.50±0.34a | 73.24±1.51b | |
硫酸镁Mg | 13.80±0.34cd | 10.49±1.17cd | 12.60±0.18c | 83.75±1.85a | |
肽肥+硫酸镁P+Mg | 14.52±0.41bc | 11.08±0.73bc | 12.19±0.04c | 82.07±2.54a | |
氨基酸肥料AA | 15.59±0.43a | 11.13±0.46bc | 13.85±0.2a | 70.87±1.60bc | |
氨基酸+硫酸镁AA+Mg | 13.09±0.54d | 9.82±0.44d | 12.89±0.46b | 83.76±2.04a |
处理 Treatments | 横径 Diameter (mm) | 纵径 Vertical diameter (mm) | 单粒重 Single grain weight(g) | 单穗重 Single panicle weight(g) | 产量 Yield (kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
清水CK Clean water | 17.99±0.51b | 35.74±0.44ab | 7.61±0.47c | 697.78±34.05c | 39 075±1 906b |
肽肥P Peptide fertilizer | 19.29±0.67a | 35.25±0.59ab | 8.86±0.16ab | 797.78±10.72ab | 44 217±836ab |
硫酸镁Mg Magnesium sulfate | 19.77±0.23a | 33.80±0.99b | 8.01±0.17bc | 721.11±56.01bc | 43 678±3 092ab |
肽肥+硫酸镁P+Mg Peptide fertilizer+ Magnesium sulfate | 19.20±0.14ab | 37.71±0.63a | 9.39±0.68a | 813.33±57.96a | 46 081±2 021a |
氨基酸肥料AA Amino acid fertilizer | 19.46±0.55a | 35.48±1.72ab | 8.56±0.71ab | 773.89±28.5abc | 43 337±1 595ab |
氨基酸+硫酸镁AA+Mg Amino acid+ Magnesium sulfate | 19.51±0.34a | 36.38±1.84ab | 9.05±0.21ab | 785.72±44.76abc | 43 400±2 506ab |
Tab.3 Effects of different treatments on grape yield components
处理 Treatments | 横径 Diameter (mm) | 纵径 Vertical diameter (mm) | 单粒重 Single grain weight(g) | 单穗重 Single panicle weight(g) | 产量 Yield (kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
清水CK Clean water | 17.99±0.51b | 35.74±0.44ab | 7.61±0.47c | 697.78±34.05c | 39 075±1 906b |
肽肥P Peptide fertilizer | 19.29±0.67a | 35.25±0.59ab | 8.86±0.16ab | 797.78±10.72ab | 44 217±836ab |
硫酸镁Mg Magnesium sulfate | 19.77±0.23a | 33.80±0.99b | 8.01±0.17bc | 721.11±56.01bc | 43 678±3 092ab |
肽肥+硫酸镁P+Mg Peptide fertilizer+ Magnesium sulfate | 19.20±0.14ab | 37.71±0.63a | 9.39±0.68a | 813.33±57.96a | 46 081±2 021a |
氨基酸肥料AA Amino acid fertilizer | 19.46±0.55a | 35.48±1.72ab | 8.56±0.71ab | 773.89±28.5abc | 43 337±1 595ab |
氨基酸+硫酸镁AA+Mg Amino acid+ Magnesium sulfate | 19.51±0.34a | 36.38±1.84ab | 9.05±0.21ab | 785.72±44.76abc | 43 400±2 506ab |
处理 Treatments | 可溶性固形物 Soluble solids(%) | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar(%) | 可滴定酸 Titratable acid(%) | VC (mg/100g) |
---|---|---|---|---|
清水CK Clean water | 15.91±0.54c | 10.12±0.63c | 0.506±0.06ab | 2.15±0.08c |
肽肥P Peptide fertilizer | 17.57±0.52ab | 14.57±0.32a | 0.374±0.05d | 2.58±0.18ab |
硫酸镁Mg Magnesium sulfate | 17.24±0.17b | 12.18±0.18b | 0.437±0.06bcd | 2.30±0.32bc |
肽肥+硫酸镁P+Mg Peptide fertilizer+ Magnesium sulfate | 18.16±0.11a | 14.01±0.51a | 0.403±0.01cd | 2.77±0.15a |
氨基酸肥料AA Amino acid fertilizer | 16.99±0.33b | 14.62±0.87a | 0.471±0.02abc | 2.59±0.15ab |
氨基酸+硫酸镁AA+Mg Amino acid+ Magnesium sulfate | 16.13±0.21c | 10.70±0.18bc | 0.536±0.01a | 2.59±0.19ab |
Tab.4 Fruit quality of grapes with different treatments
处理 Treatments | 可溶性固形物 Soluble solids(%) | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar(%) | 可滴定酸 Titratable acid(%) | VC (mg/100g) |
---|---|---|---|---|
清水CK Clean water | 15.91±0.54c | 10.12±0.63c | 0.506±0.06ab | 2.15±0.08c |
肽肥P Peptide fertilizer | 17.57±0.52ab | 14.57±0.32a | 0.374±0.05d | 2.58±0.18ab |
硫酸镁Mg Magnesium sulfate | 17.24±0.17b | 12.18±0.18b | 0.437±0.06bcd | 2.30±0.32bc |
肽肥+硫酸镁P+Mg Peptide fertilizer+ Magnesium sulfate | 18.16±0.11a | 14.01±0.51a | 0.403±0.01cd | 2.77±0.15a |
氨基酸肥料AA Amino acid fertilizer | 16.99±0.33b | 14.62±0.87a | 0.471±0.02abc | 2.59±0.15ab |
氨基酸+硫酸镁AA+Mg Amino acid+ Magnesium sulfate | 16.13±0.21c | 10.70±0.18bc | 0.536±0.01a | 2.59±0.19ab |
处理 Treatments | PC1(CV=9.582) | PC2(CV=2.207) | PC3(CV=1.860) | 综合 得分(F) Composite score | 累计 贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate | 综合得 分排名 Comprehensive Score Ranking | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
得分(F1) | 贡献率 Contri bution rate | 得分(F2) | 贡献率 Contri bution rate | 得分(F3) | 贡献率 Contri bution rate | ||||
清水CK Clean water | -5.139 9 | 63.88% | 0.999 7 | 14.71% | -1.293 | 12.40% | -3.296 7 | 91.00% | 6 |
肽肥P Peptide fertilizer | 3.003 | -0.914 6 | -1.133 3 | 1.643 3 | 2 | ||||
硫酸镁Mg Magnesium sulfate | -1.208 3 | -2.296 5 | 0.421 6 | -1.057 5 | 5 | ||||
肽肥+硫酸镁 P+Mg Peptide fertilizer+ Magnesium sulfate | 3.110 9 | 1.857 7 | -0.177 4 | 2.238 7 | 1 | ||||
氨基酸肥料AA Amino acid fertilizer | 0.924 4 | -0.276 4 | -0.213 4 | 0.523 4 | 3 | ||||
氨基酸+硫酸镁 AA+Mg Amino acid+ Magnesium sulfate | -0.690 2 | 0.630 1 | 2.395 4 | -0.051 1 | 4 |
Tab.5 Principal component analysis of grape photosynthetic parameters, quality and yield with different treatments
处理 Treatments | PC1(CV=9.582) | PC2(CV=2.207) | PC3(CV=1.860) | 综合 得分(F) Composite score | 累计 贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate | 综合得 分排名 Comprehensive Score Ranking | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
得分(F1) | 贡献率 Contri bution rate | 得分(F2) | 贡献率 Contri bution rate | 得分(F3) | 贡献率 Contri bution rate | ||||
清水CK Clean water | -5.139 9 | 63.88% | 0.999 7 | 14.71% | -1.293 | 12.40% | -3.296 7 | 91.00% | 6 |
肽肥P Peptide fertilizer | 3.003 | -0.914 6 | -1.133 3 | 1.643 3 | 2 | ||||
硫酸镁Mg Magnesium sulfate | -1.208 3 | -2.296 5 | 0.421 6 | -1.057 5 | 5 | ||||
肽肥+硫酸镁 P+Mg Peptide fertilizer+ Magnesium sulfate | 3.110 9 | 1.857 7 | -0.177 4 | 2.238 7 | 1 | ||||
氨基酸肥料AA Amino acid fertilizer | 0.924 4 | -0.276 4 | -0.213 4 | 0.523 4 | 3 | ||||
氨基酸+硫酸镁 AA+Mg Amino acid+ Magnesium sulfate | -0.690 2 | 0.630 1 | 2.395 4 | -0.051 1 | 4 |
[1] | 国家统计局. 国家数据:果园面积和水果产品.[2021-09-28] |
https://data:stats.gov.cn/. National Bureau of statistics National data:orchard area and fruit production.[2021-09-28] | |
[2] | 史祥宾, 刘凤之, 邱毅, 等. 葡萄同步全营养配方水溶肥在‘无核白鸡心’上的应用研究[J]. 中国果树, 2021,(10):49-52. |
SHI Xiangbin, LIU Fengzhi, QIU Yi, et al. Study on the application of grape synchronous total nutrition formula water-soluble fertilizer on 'seedless white chicken heart'[J]. China Fruits, 2021,(10):49-52. | |
[3] | 曹洪宇, 纪小辉, 张昀, 等. 不同含量腐植酸复合肥对葡萄产量和品质的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2019, 50(3):670-674. |
CAO Hongyu, JI Xiaohui, ZHANG Yun, et al. Effects of humic acid compound fertilizer with different content on grape yield and quality[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2019, 50(3):670-674. | |
[4] | 李青军, 张炎, 胡伟, 等. 硫酸钾镁肥在葡萄上施用效果研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2014, 51(11):2009-2013. |
LI Qingjun, ZHANG Yan, HU Wei, et al. Effect of potassium magnesium sulfate fertilizer on grapes[J] Xinjiang Agricultural Science, 2014, 51(11): 2009-2013. | |
[5] | 韩艳婷, 杨国顺, 石雪晖, 等. 不同镁营养水平对红地球葡萄叶绿体结构及光合响应的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2011, 28(4):603-609. |
HAN Yanting, YANG Guoshun, SHI Xuehui, et al. Effects of different magnesium nutrition levels on chloroplast structure and photosynthetic response of Red Globe Grape[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2011, 28(4): 603-609. | |
[6] | 马晓丽, 王进, 关睢, 等. 施镁对缺镁葡萄叶片和果实矿质元素含量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017,(6):117-121. |
MA Xiaoli, WANG Jin, GUAN Sui, et al. Effects of magnesium application on mineral element contents in leaves and fruits of magnesium deficient grapes[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2017, (6): 117-121. | |
[7] | 沈世华, 朱至清. 新型植物生长调节物质——激素性多肽的研究进展[J]. 植物学通报, 1999(6):648-652,641. |
SHEN Shihua, ZHU Zhiqing. Research progress of a new plant growth regulator hormone polypeptide[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 1999(6): 648-652,641. | |
[8] | 熊川, 罗强, 黄文丽, 等. 菜籽饼粕中多肽的提取纯化及抗肿瘤活性[J/OL]. 中国粮油学报:1-11[2021-12-10]. |
XIONG Chuan, LUO Qiang, HUANG Wenli, et al. Extraction, purification and antitumor activity of peptides from rapeseed meal[J/OL]. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association: 1-11 [2021-12-10]. | |
[9] | 周兆禧, 杜中军, 陈业渊, 等. 多肽在农作物生长发育中的作用研究进展[J]. 广东农业科学, 2008,(11):145-147. |
ZHOU Zhaoxi, DU Zhongjun, CHEN Yeyuan, et al. Research Progress on the role of peptides in crop growth and development[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Science, 2008, (11): 145-147. | |
[10] | 马晓丽, 黄本义, 黄艳, 等. 镁肥对葡萄光合速率和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2018,(1):70-76. |
MA Xiaoli, HUANG Benyi, HUANG Yan, et al. Effects of magnesium fertilizer on photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of grape[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2018,(1): 70-76. | |
[11] | 蔡小林, 潘介春, 周煜棉, 等. 大豆多肽对番荔枝幼苗生长和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2017, 46(3):4. |
CAI Xiaolin, PAN Jiechun, ZHOU Yumian, et al. Effects of soybean peptides on growth and antioxidant enzyme activities of Annona chinensis seedlings[J]. Southern ChinaFruits, 2017, 46(3):4. | |
[12] | 刘国强, 强涛涛, 王明华, 等. 多肽与多肽螯合铁叶面肥的制备及应用[J]. 精细化工, 2021, 38(6):1147-1154. |
LIU Guoqiang, QIANG Taotao, WANG Minghua, et al. Preparation and application of polypeptide and polypeptide chelated iron leaf fertilizer[J]. Fine Chemicals, 2021, 38(6):1147- 1154. | |
[13] | 沈欣, 李燕婷, 袁亮, 等. 氨基酸与锌配合喷施提高小白菜生物量、品质及锌利用效率[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(1):181-188. |
SHEN Xin, LI Yanting, YUAN Liang, et al. Combined spraying of amino acid and zinc to improve biomass, quality and zinc utilization efficiency of Chinese Cabbage[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2017, 23(1): 181-188. | |
[14] | 杜邦, 周兆禧, 李贵利, 等. 多肽在凯特芒果上的应用效果[J]. 热带作物学报, 2009,(11):1608-1611. |
DU Bang, ZHOU Zhaoxi, LI Guili, et al. Application effect of polypeptide on Kate mango[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2009,(11): 1608-1611. | |
[15] | 周兆禧, 杜中军, 陈业渊, 等. 多肽处理对芒果钙素营养吸收的影响研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2009, (2):21-22. |
ZHOU Zhaoxi, DU Zhongjun, CHEN Yeyuan, et al. Effect of polypeptide treatment on calcium absorption of mango[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Science, 2009, (2): 21-22. | |
[16] |
Calvo Pamela, Nelson Louise, Kloepper Joseph W. Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants[J]. Plant and Soil, 2014, 383(1/2):3-41.
DOI URL |
[17] | 王东升, 黄忠阳, 吴旭东, 等. 不同施肥对鲜食玉米生长及肥料农学利用率的影响[J]. 土壤, 2021, 53(2):299-304. |
WANG Dongsheng, HUANG Zhongyang, WU Xudong, et al. Effects of different fertilization on growth and fertilizer agronomic utilization of fresh maize[J]. Soils, 2021, 53(2): 299-304. | |
[18] | 汤秋云, 高琪, 李思彤, 等. 污泥蛋白肽对土壤微生态及植物生长调控[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015, 9(11):5611-5616. |
TANG Qiuyun, GAO Qi, LI Sitong, et al. Regulation of sludge protein peptides on soil microecology and plant growth[J]. ChineseJournal of Environmental Engineering, 2015, 9(11): 5611-5616. | |
[19] | 李效超, 王蕊, 李新国, 等. 大豆多肽对巴西蕉幼苗抗冷性的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2009,(5):5. |
LI Xiaochao, WANG Rui, LI Xinguo, et al. Effects of soybean peptides on Chilling Resistance of banana seedlings[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2009,(5): 5. | |
[20] | 王胤, 祖力皮卡尔·阿不力克木, 贾鑫慧, 等. 生物多肽在黄瓜上的抗病及促生效果研究[J]. 蔬菜, 2021(4):47-51. |
WANG Yin, Zulipikaer Abulikemu, JIA Xinhui, et al. Study on disease resistance and growth promoting effect of biological peptides on cucumber[J]. Vegetables, 2021(4): 47-51. | |
[21] | 李松刚, 陈业渊, 杜中军, 等. 多肽对荔枝成花、果实发育、产量和果实品质的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2010,(4):567-571. |
LI Songgang, CHEN Yeyuan, DU Zhongjun, et al. Effects of polypeptides on flowering, fruit development, yield and fruit quality of litchi[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2010,(4): 567-571. | |
[22] | 曾小岑. 多肽对巨峰葡萄冬果品质,产量及主要元素吸收的影响[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2011. |
ZENG Xiaocen. Effects of polypeptides on winter fruit quality, yield and absorption of main elements of Jufenggrape[D]. Naning: Guangxi University, 2011. | |
[23] | 杨江山. 氨基酸叶面肥对设施延后‘红地球’葡萄光合特性和品质的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2012, 47(6):81-86. |
YANG Jiangshan. Effects of amino acid foliar fertilizer on Photosynthetic Characteristics and quality of 'red earth' grape after facility delay[J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2012, 47(6): 81-86. | |
[24] |
谢辉, 张雯, 王敏, 等. 不同干燥方法对森田尼无核葡萄干色泽及次生代谢物质变化的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(12):2166-2174.
DOI |
XIE Hui, ZHANG Wen, WANG Min, et al. Effects of different drying methods on color and secondary metabolites of suntani seedless raisins[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(12): 2166-2174.
DOI |
|
[25] | 周兴本, 刘士冲, 郭修武, 等. 不同水分条件下森田尼无核葡萄光合日变化[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2012, 40(12):182-184. |
ZHOU Xingben, LIU Shichong, GUO Xiuwu, et al. Diurnal changes of photosynthesis of seedless grape Moritani under different water conditions[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 40(12): 182-184. | |
[26] | 张宪政. 植物叶绿素含量测定——丙酮乙醇混合液法[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 1986,(3):28-30. |
ZHANG Xianzheng. Determination of plant chlorophyll content ——acetone ethanol mixture method[J]. Liaoning Agricultural Science, 1986,(3): 28-30. | |
[27] | 曹建康, 姜微波, 赵玉梅. 果蔬采后生理生化实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国轻工业出版社, 2007. |
CAO Jiankang, JIANG Weibo, ZHAO Yumei. Guidance for postharvest physiological and biochemical experiments of fruits and vegetables[M]. Beijing: China Light Industry Press, 2007. | |
[28] | 陈钧辉, 李俊. 生物化学实验(第5版)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014. |
CHEN Junhui, LI Jun. Biochemistry experiment (the 5th Ed.)[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2014. | |
[29] | 古超峰, 张丽, 闫鹏科, 等. 叶面喷施不同浓度镁肥对酿酒葡萄光合特性、产量及浆果品质的影响[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2021, 48(2):206-212. |
GU Chaofeng, ZHANG Li, YAN Pengke, et al. Effects of foliar spraying of different concentrations of magnesium fertilizer on photosynthetic characteristics, yield and berry quality of wine grape[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 2021, 48(2): 206-212. | |
[30] | 马宗桓, 陈佰鸿, 胡紫瞡, 等. 施氮时期对干旱荒漠区‘蛇龙珠’葡萄叶片糖代谢及果实品质的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018, 36(6):145-152,167. |
MA Zonghuan, CHEN Baihong, HU Zizhen, et al. Effects of nitrogen application period on leaf sugar metabolism and fruit quality of 'snake dragon pearl' grape in arid desert area[J]. Agricultural Research in Arid Areas, 2018, 36(6): 145-152,167. | |
[31] | 李磊, 王锐, 纪立东, 等. 氮肥施用量对酿酒葡萄初果期生长及产量品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2016,(21):32-36. |
LI Lei, WANG Rui, JI Lidong, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rate on growth, yield and quality of wine grape in early fruit stage[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2016,(21): 32-36. | |
[32] | 王华静, 吴良欢, 陶勤南. 高等植物氨基酸生物效应的研究进展[J]. 土壤通报, 2003,(5):469-472. |
WANG Huajing, WU Lianghuan, TAO Qinnan. Research Progress on biological effects of amino acids in higher plants[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2003,(5): 469-472. | |
[33] |
温明霞, 张顺昌, 吴韶辉, 等. 蛋白水解氨基酸肥料对红美人杂柑果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(3):422-428.
DOI |
WEN Mingxia, ZHANG Shunchang, WU Shaohui, et al. Effects of protei- n hydrolyzed amino acid fertilizer on fruit quality of red beauty hybrid citrus[J]. Zhejiang Agricultural Journal, 2021, 33(3): 422-428. | |
[34] | 李磊, 尹显慧, 龙友华, 等. 氨基酸水溶肥对辣椒果实氨基酸含量及品质的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2019, 50(5):1049-1056. |
LI Lei, YIN Xianhui, LONG Youhua, et al. Effects of amino acid water-soluble fertilizer on amino acid content and quality of pepper fruit[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2019, 50(5): 1049-1056. | |
[35] | 谢荔, 成学慧, 冯新新, 等. 氨基酸肥料对‘夏黑’葡萄叶片光合特性与果实品质的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2013, 36(2):31-37. |
XIE Li, CHENG Xuehui, FENG Xinxin, et al. Effects of amino acid fertilizer on leaf photosynthetic characteristics and fruit quality of 'Xiahei' grape[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2013, 36 (2): 31-37. |
[1] | JIN Juan, LI lili, YANG Lei, FAN Dingyu, HAO Qing. Analysis on the Development status of Xinjiang Jujube Industry [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 106-110. |
[2] | WU Yating, CHEN He, ZHENG Nan, MA Xianlan, ZHOU Lina, ZHAO Yankun. Current situation and development trend prospect of Xinjiang characteristic dairy industry [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 158-162. |
[3] | HOU Xianzheng, XIAO Tong, CHEN Yulan, WEI Jiyu. The spatial effects and mechanism of digital technology innovation on agricultural economic resilience [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 196-205. |
[4] | YUE Rongqiang, ZHANG Qiong, WANG Fang, DENG Wenwen, CHEN Yu, Maiwulanjiang Mamut, Nurmanquli Batur. Improve the academic quality and influence of agricultural academic journals [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 256-260. |
[5] | WANG Junduo, CUI Yujiang, LIANG Yajun, GONG Zhaolong, ZHENG Junyun, LI Xueyuan. Xinjiang cotton production advantageous regional layout scheme [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 60-69. |
[6] | FANG Hui, DING Yindeng, FAN Guiqiang, GAO Yonghong, HUANG Tianrong. Research report on the development status of wheat industry in southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 75-80. |
[7] | YANG Minghua, LIAO Biyong, LIU Qiang, PENG Yuncheng, Dawulai Jiekeshan, FENG Guorui, TANG Shimin. Study on variation of grain nutritional quality of glutinous maize [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2087-2093. |
[8] | ZHANG Zehua, YE Hanchun, WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao, LI Haiqiang, LIU Jian. Effects of equal nitrogen applied with urease inhibitor on cotton growth, yield, and quality under mulched drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111. |
[9] | CHEN Ruijie, LUO Linyi, RUAN Xiangyang, YE Jun. Effects of humic acid on soil nutrients, cotton yield and quality in cotton fields under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121. |
[10] | LIU Jing, DU Mingchuan, ZHANG Wenting, BAO Haijuan, JING Meiling, DU Wenhua. Screening of triticale germplasm in different areas of Qinghai [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2183-2190. |
[11] | TIAN Haiyan, ZHANG Zhanqin, XIE Jianhui, WANG Jianjiang, YANG Xiangkun. Study on the relationship between Lycopene and main quality characters of processing tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2197-2202. |
[12] | ZHANG Tingjun, LI Zihui, CUI Yujiang, SUN Xiaogui, CHEN Fang. Effects of microbial agents on cotton growth and soil physico-chemical properties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2269-2276. |
[13] | CHEN Fang, LI Zihui, SUNXiaogui , ZHANG Tingjun. Different dosage of microbial agents on the yield and quality of processed tomatoes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289. |
[14] | QIAO Yajie, FU Huixin, QIAO Xue, MENG Xintao, ZHANG Ting, PAN Yan. Study on the variation of fresh beef quality under different storage temperature conditions [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2323-2329. |
[15] | ZHANG Chengjie, HU Haoran, DUAN Songjiang, WU Yifan, ZHANG Jusong. Effects of nitrogen-dense interaction on growth, development, yield and quality of Gossypium barbadense L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 61
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 175
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||