Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (8): 1929-1934.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.8.013
• Horticultural Special Local Products·Germplasm Resources·Storage and Preservation Processing·Soil Fertilizer • Previous Articles Next Articles
GU Ningning1(), ZHANG Pu2, XIE Yanru2, TANG Dan2, ZHAO Zhixin3, DONG Ruifang4, CUI Yongmin4, QIN Yong2(
)
Received:
2021-11-01
Online:
2022-08-20
Published:
2022-10-01
Correspondence author:
QIN Yong
Supported by:
古宁宁1(), 张蒲2, 谢彦如2, 唐丹2, 赵志信3, 董瑞芳4, 崔拥民4, 秦勇2(
)
通讯作者:
秦勇
作者简介:
古宁宁(1989-),女,四川人,硕士研究生,研究方向为蔬菜栽培与生理,(E-mail) 275175120@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
GU Ningning, ZHANG Pu, XIE Yanru, TANG Dan, ZHAO Zhixin, DONG Ruifang, CUI Yongmin, QIN Yong. Effects of Different Fertilizer Rates on the Growth of Tomato Seedlings[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(8): 1929-1934.
古宁宁, 张蒲, 谢彦如, 唐丹, 赵志信, 董瑞芳, 崔拥民, 秦勇. 基质中化肥施入量对番茄幼苗生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(8): 1929-1934.
处理 Treatments | 氮 N (g/m3) | 磷 P2O5 (g/m3) | 钾 K2O (g/m3) |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 0 | 0 | 0 |
T1 | 160 | 36 | 160 |
T2 | 140 | 28 | 140 |
T3 | 120 | 24 | 120 |
T4 | 100 | 20 | 100 |
T5 | 80 | 16 | 80 |
Table 1 Fertilizer concentration ratio
处理 Treatments | 氮 N (g/m3) | 磷 P2O5 (g/m3) | 钾 K2O (g/m3) |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 0 | 0 | 0 |
T1 | 160 | 36 | 160 |
T2 | 140 | 28 | 140 |
T3 | 120 | 24 | 120 |
T4 | 100 | 20 | 100 |
T5 | 80 | 16 | 80 |
处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 茎粗 Stem diameter(mm) | 最大叶面积 Maximum leaf area(cm2) | 地上部鲜重 Fresh aboveground weight(g) | 地下部鲜重 Fresh underground weight(g) | 根长 Root length (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 18.77±0.29a | 3.81±0.16a | 15.49±2.28c | 2.91±0.09d | 0.64±0.006b | 13.43±0.86ab |
T1 | 16.57±0.27bc | 3.31±0.16a | 18.76±1.91ab | 3.59±0.38bc | 0.71±0.04ab | 12.38±0.51ab |
T2 | 18.24±0.38ab | 3.80±0.13a | 21.29±2.35a | 3.88±0.17ab | 0.78±0.04a | 15.54±1.90a |
T3 | 16.34±0.99c | 3.57±0.23a | 17.01±1.88bc | 3.21±0.11cd | 0.68±0.04ab | 15.14±0.52ab |
T4 | 18.51±0.79a | 3.51±0.23a | 21.06±2.47a | 4.23±0.18a | 0.78±0.07a | 14.03±1.26ab |
T5 | 16.95±0.05abc | 3.28±0.15a | 18.84±2.32ab | 3.56±0.09bc | 0.70±0.03ab | 11.81±0.46b |
Table 2 Effects of different fertilizer rates on plant height, stem diameter, maximum leaf area, fresh weight and root length of tomato seedlings
处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 茎粗 Stem diameter(mm) | 最大叶面积 Maximum leaf area(cm2) | 地上部鲜重 Fresh aboveground weight(g) | 地下部鲜重 Fresh underground weight(g) | 根长 Root length (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 18.77±0.29a | 3.81±0.16a | 15.49±2.28c | 2.91±0.09d | 0.64±0.006b | 13.43±0.86ab |
T1 | 16.57±0.27bc | 3.31±0.16a | 18.76±1.91ab | 3.59±0.38bc | 0.71±0.04ab | 12.38±0.51ab |
T2 | 18.24±0.38ab | 3.80±0.13a | 21.29±2.35a | 3.88±0.17ab | 0.78±0.04a | 15.54±1.90a |
T3 | 16.34±0.99c | 3.57±0.23a | 17.01±1.88bc | 3.21±0.11cd | 0.68±0.04ab | 15.14±0.52ab |
T4 | 18.51±0.79a | 3.51±0.23a | 21.06±2.47a | 4.23±0.18a | 0.78±0.07a | 14.03±1.26ab |
T5 | 16.95±0.05abc | 3.28±0.15a | 18.84±2.32ab | 3.56±0.09bc | 0.70±0.03ab | 11.81±0.46b |
处理 Treatment | 地上部干重 Above ground dry weight(g) | 地下部干重 Underground dry weight(g) | 根体积 Root volume (cm3) | 根冠比 Root shoot ratio | 壮苗指数 Sound Seedling Index | G值 G value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 0.43±0.02a | 0.06±0.003bc | 3.83±0.12d | 0.13±0.01b | 0.16±0.01bc | 0.012±0.00a |
T1 | 0.33±0.02b | 0.06±0.006bc | 5.67±0.44abc | 0.19±0.02a | 0.15±0.01cd | 0.010±0.00b |
T2 | 0.41±0.03a | 0.07±0.006ab | 6.17±0.17a | 0.17±0.02b | 0.18±0.01ab | 0.012±0.00a |
T3 | 0.28±0.01b | 0.05±0.003c | 5.17±0.44bc | 0.19±0.01a | 0.14±0.01d | 0.008±0.00b |
T4 | 0.43±0.02a | 0.08±0.00a | 6.00±0.29ab | 0.19±0.01a | 0.19±0.00a | 0.013±0.00b |
T5 | 0.33±0.01b | 0.06±0.003bc | 4.83±0.17c | 0.17±0.01b | 0.14±0.02cd | 0.009±0.00b |
Table 3 Effects of different fertilizer rates on dry weight, root volume, root cap ratio, seedling strength index and G value of tomato seedlings
处理 Treatment | 地上部干重 Above ground dry weight(g) | 地下部干重 Underground dry weight(g) | 根体积 Root volume (cm3) | 根冠比 Root shoot ratio | 壮苗指数 Sound Seedling Index | G值 G value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 0.43±0.02a | 0.06±0.003bc | 3.83±0.12d | 0.13±0.01b | 0.16±0.01bc | 0.012±0.00a |
T1 | 0.33±0.02b | 0.06±0.006bc | 5.67±0.44abc | 0.19±0.02a | 0.15±0.01cd | 0.010±0.00b |
T2 | 0.41±0.03a | 0.07±0.006ab | 6.17±0.17a | 0.17±0.02b | 0.18±0.01ab | 0.012±0.00a |
T3 | 0.28±0.01b | 0.05±0.003c | 5.17±0.44bc | 0.19±0.01a | 0.14±0.01d | 0.008±0.00b |
T4 | 0.43±0.02a | 0.08±0.00a | 6.00±0.29ab | 0.19±0.01a | 0.19±0.00a | 0.013±0.00b |
T5 | 0.33±0.01b | 0.06±0.003bc | 4.83±0.17c | 0.17±0.01b | 0.14±0.02cd | 0.009±0.00b |
处理 Treatment | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar (mg/g) | 可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein(mg/g) | 类胡萝卜素 Carotenoids (mg/g) | 叶绿素a Chlorophyll a (mg/g) | 叶绿素b Chlorophyll b (mg/g) | 叶绿素a+b Chlorophyll a+b (mg/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 7.13±1.42a | 10.00±0.95a | 0.25±0.02a | 0.74±0.04c | 0.19±0.00b | 0.93±0.04b |
T1 | 5.36±0.49a | 10.48±1.18a | 0.18±0.02c | 0.89±0.08bc | 0.39±0.03ab | 1.28±0.11ab |
T2 | 8.15±0.89a | 11.88±1.01a | 0.19±0.01bc | 1.15±0.16ab | 0.63±0.22a | 1.78±0.38a |
T3 | 7.26±0.36a | 11.09±1.34a | 0.21±0.01bc | 1.06±0.05ab | 0.46±0.03ab | 1.53±0.08a |
T4 | 6.97±0.89a | 11.19±0.72a | 0.23±0.01ab | 1.20±0.06a | 0.51±0.03a | 1.72±0.08a |
T5 | 6.50±0.89a | 10.75±1.02a | 0.22±0.03abc | 1.10±0.07ab | 0.50±0.04ab | 1.60±0.11a |
Table 4 Effects of different fertilizer rates on physiological and biochemical indexes of tomato seedlings
处理 Treatment | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar (mg/g) | 可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein(mg/g) | 类胡萝卜素 Carotenoids (mg/g) | 叶绿素a Chlorophyll a (mg/g) | 叶绿素b Chlorophyll b (mg/g) | 叶绿素a+b Chlorophyll a+b (mg/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 7.13±1.42a | 10.00±0.95a | 0.25±0.02a | 0.74±0.04c | 0.19±0.00b | 0.93±0.04b |
T1 | 5.36±0.49a | 10.48±1.18a | 0.18±0.02c | 0.89±0.08bc | 0.39±0.03ab | 1.28±0.11ab |
T2 | 8.15±0.89a | 11.88±1.01a | 0.19±0.01bc | 1.15±0.16ab | 0.63±0.22a | 1.78±0.38a |
T3 | 7.26±0.36a | 11.09±1.34a | 0.21±0.01bc | 1.06±0.05ab | 0.46±0.03ab | 1.53±0.08a |
T4 | 6.97±0.89a | 11.19±0.72a | 0.23±0.01ab | 1.20±0.06a | 0.51±0.03a | 1.72±0.08a |
T5 | 6.50±0.89a | 10.75±1.02a | 0.22±0.03abc | 1.10±0.07ab | 0.50±0.04ab | 1.60±0.11a |
[1] | 王晓雪, 付亚文, 金巨胜. 蔬菜合理施肥[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1997. |
WANG Xiaoxue, FU Yawen, JIN Jusheng. Reasonable fertilization of vegetables[M]Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1997. | |
[2] | 费素娥, 王秀峰, 等. 育苗基质中氮磷钾配比对番茄穴盘苗质量的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2006,(1):50-53. |
FEI Sue, WANG Xiufeng, et al. The Effect of the Proportion of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium in Seedling Media on Tomato Plug Seedling Quality[J]. Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences,(2006),(1):50-53. | |
[3] | 赵明, 李祥云, 高峻岭, 等. 茄果类蔬菜育苗基质优化施肥技术研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2002,(2):42-44. |
ZHAO Ming, LI Xiangyun, GAO Junling, et al. Research on Optimum Fertilization Technology of Solanum Fruit Seedlings[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2002,(2):42-44. | |
[4] | 王瑞. 不同肥料配方对番茄复合基质育苗的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2012,(6):58-59. |
WANG Rui. Effect of Different Fertilizer Formulas on Tomato Seedling Raising in Compound Substrate[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2012,(6):58-59. | |
[5] | 陈振德, 黄俊杰, 蔡葵, 等. 合成基质条件下番茄苗期施肥量研究[J]. 土壤, 1997,(3):158-160. |
CHEN Zhende, HUANG Junjie, CAI Kui, et al. Study on Fertilizer Rate of Tomato Seedling under Synthetic Substrate[J]. Soil, 1997,(3):158-160. | |
[6] | 李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京高等教育出版社, 2000. |
LI Hesheng. Principles and Techniques of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry Experiments[M]. Beijing Higher Education Press, 2000. | |
[7] | 郭世荣. 无土栽培学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003. |
GUO Shirong. Soilless culture[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press. 2003. | |
[8] | 杨鹏鸣, 周修任. 不同施肥水平对南瓜根冠比和壮苗指标的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2010, 23(1):115-118. |
YANG Pengming, ZHOU Xiuren. Effects of Different Fertilization Levels on Pumpkin Root/shoot Ratio and Strong Seedling Index[J]. Southwest Agricultural Journal, 2010, 23(1):115-118. | |
[9] | 杨延杰, 赵康, 陈宁, 等. 不同基质理化性状对春季番茄幼苗生长及根系形态的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2013, 22(7):125-131. |
YANG Yanjie, ZHAO Kang, CHEN Ning, et al. Effects of physical and chemical properties of different substrates on spring tomato seedling growth and root morphology[J]. Northwest Agricultural Journal, 2013, 22(7):125-131. | |
[10] | 杨军, 邵玉翠, 仁顺荣, 等. 不同基质配方对番茄冬季育苗的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(4):223-226. |
YANG Jun, SHAO Yucui, REN Shunrong, et al. Effects of Different Substrate Formulas on Tomato Seedlings in Winter[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(4):223-226. | |
[11] | 孙建磊, 吕晓惠, 赵西, 等. 椰糠与蛭石不同配比对番茄穴盘苗生长的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2016,(5):45-48. |
SUN Jianlei, LV Xiaohui, ZHAO Xi, et al. Effects of different ratios of coconut peat and vermiculite on the growth of tomato plug seedlings[J]. Chinese vegetables, 2016,(5):45-48. | |
[12] | 耿广东, 宋明军, 张素勤. 不同氮磷钾配比对番茄幼苗生长的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2016,(3):41-43. |
GENG Guangjun, SONG Mingjun, ZHANG Suqin. Effects of Different Ratios of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium on Tomato Seedling Growth[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2016,(3):41-43. | |
[13] |
张志刚, 台连丽, 李福凯, 等. 基质养分添加量对番茄穴盘苗成苗质量的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2016, 31(S1):302-305.
DOI |
ZHANG Zhigang, TAI Lianli, LI Fukai, et al. Effects of Nutrient Addition in Substrate on the Quality of Tomato Plug Seedlings[J]. Journal of North China Agriculture, 2016, 31(S1):302-305. | |
[14] | 张恩平, 谭福雷, 王月. 氮磷钾与有机肥配施对番茄产量品质及土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2015, 42(10):2059-2067. |
ZHANG Enping, TAN Fulei, WANG Yue, et al. Effects of Combined Application of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium and Organic Fertilizers on Tomato Yield and Quality and Soil Enzyme Activities[J]. Acta Horticulture,(2015), 42(10):2059-2067. | |
[15] | 杨旭, 殷朝珍. 不同氮磷钾配比及其含量对番茄穴盘苗生长的影响[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2008,(20):40-41. |
YANG Xv, YIN Chaozhen. Effects of different ratios of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium and theircontents on the growth of tomato plug seedlings[J]. Yangtze River Vegetables, 2008,(20):40-41. | |
[16] | 潘晖. 氮磷钾肥不同配比在加工番茄上的应用效果[J]. 农村科技, 2017,(1):23-24. |
PAN Hui. Application Effect of Different Proportions of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium on Processing Tomato[J]. Rural Technology,(2017),(1):23-24. |
[1] | BIAN Qingyong, FU Yanbo, QI Tong, HUANG Jian, PU Shenghai, MENG Ajing, Halihashi Yibati. Study on influencing factors of cotton emergence and protection measures in saline-alkali land in southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 95-100. |
[2] | HUANG Boxuan, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, SHAO Jingjing, FENG Weina, PANG Chaoyou, XU Wenxiu, DONG Helin. Effects of different nitrogen inhibitors on growth, nitrogen utilization and yield of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131. |
[3] | WANG Chao, XU Wenxiu, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, FENG Weina, SHAO Jingjing, DONG Helin. Response of cotton seedling growth and development to soil available potassium levels [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2132-2139. |
[4] | ZHANG Fan, CHEN Xiaolu, WANG Jie, HOU Xianfei, JIA Donghai, GU Yuanguo, MIAO Haocui, LI Qiang. Effects of mixed salt stress on seed germination and seedling growth of peanut seed [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2168-2182. |
[5] | XU Maomao, GAO Jie, LI Junming, LI Xin, LIU Lei, PAN Feng. Population diversity analysis of 20 commercial tomato cultivars [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2191-2196. |
[6] | TIAN Haiyan, ZHANG Zhanqin, XIE Jianhui, WANG Jianjiang, YANG Xiangkun. Study on the relationship between Lycopene and main quality characters of processing tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2197-2202. |
[7] | TIAN Chao, LI Yushan, MA Yue, SONG Yu. Effects of different concentrations of sophora alopecuroides extract on the growth and soil fertility of continuous cropping tomatoes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2203-2210. |
[8] | CHEN Fang, LI Zihui, SUNXiaogui , ZHANG Tingjun. Different dosage of microbial agents on the yield and quality of processed tomatoes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289. |
[9] | ZHAO Suya, YANG Yanai, ZHOU Ling, LYU Xifeng, YAO Jiang, LU Yaling. Preparation of jujube based carbon slow release fertilizer with starch as adhesive and its release property analysis [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2315-2322. |
[10] | ZHANG Chengjie, HU Haoran, DUAN Songjiang, WU Yifan, ZHANG Jusong. Effects of nitrogen-dense interaction on growth, development, yield and quality of Gossypium barbadense L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830. |
[11] | YUAN Yilin, YAN An, ZUO Xiaoxiao, HOU Zhengqing, ZHANG Zhenfei, XIAO Shuting, SUN Zhe, MA Mengqian, ZHAO Yuhang. Impact of reduced nitrogen fertilization combined with bio-organic fertilizer on spring wheat yield enhancement and soil enrichment [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1872-1882. |
[12] | LI Suocheng, LIU Yantao, DONG Hongye, SUN Zhenbo, LI Ziwei, ZHANG Chunyuan, WANG Kaiyong, LI Qiang, YANG Mingfeng. Effects of potassium nutrition on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of peanut [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1926-1936. |
[13] | XI Rui, CHEN Yijia, LI Ning, YU Qinghui, WANG Qiang, QIN Yong. Effects of exogenous 2, 4-epibrassinolide on seed germination of different salt-sensitive tomatoes under salt stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1983-1992. |
[14] | ZHANG Caihong, WANG Guoqiang, JIANG Luyan, LIU Tao, DE Xianming. Variation of environmental factors and analysis of tomato traits in low-energy assembly-type deep-winter production solar greenhouse [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 2043-2053. |
[15] | YANG Mei, ZHAO Hongmei, Dilireba Xiamixiding, YANG Weijun, ZHANG Jinshan, HUI Chao. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction and biochar application on population structure, photosynthetic characteristics and yield of spring wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1582-1589. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 83
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 194
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||