Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (1): 162-169.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.01.019
• Horticultural Special Local Products·Plant Protection·Physiology and Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
SU Panlong(), LI Tao, LIU Xinyuan, WU Cailan, YANG Desong(
)
Received:
2020-10-20
Online:
2022-01-20
Published:
2022-02-18
Correspondence author:
YANG Desong
Supported by:
通讯作者:
杨德松
作者简介:
苏攀龙(1995-),男,河南灵宝人,硕士研究生,研究方向为农药毒理学,(E-mail) 1617984830@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
SU Panlong, LI Tao, LIU Xinyuan, WU Cailan, YANG Desong. The Control Effect, Herbicidal Spectrum and Safety Evaluation of 42% Fluridone Compounded with 33% Pendimethalin EC on Weeds in Cotton Fields[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(1): 162-169.
苏攀龙, 李涛, 刘新元, 吴彩兰, 杨德松. 42%氟啶草酮复配33%二甲戊灵乳油对棉田杂草的防效、杀草谱及安全性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(1): 162-169.
处理 Trea tment | 药剂名称 Drug name | 用药量 Dosage of preparation (mL/667m2) |
---|---|---|
1 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 25+200 |
2 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 30+200 |
3 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 35+200 |
4 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 40+200 |
5 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 45+200 |
6 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 100+200 |
7 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 150+200 |
8 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 200+200 |
9 | 33%二甲戊灵 EC(对照药剂) | 200 |
10 | 清水对照 | / |
Table 1 Treatment and dosage of each agent
处理 Trea tment | 药剂名称 Drug name | 用药量 Dosage of preparation (mL/667m2) |
---|---|---|
1 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 25+200 |
2 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 30+200 |
3 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 35+200 |
4 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 40+200 |
5 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 45+200 |
6 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 100+200 |
7 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 150+200 |
8 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 200+200 |
9 | 33%二甲戊灵 EC(对照药剂) | 200 |
10 | 清水对照 | / |
处理 Treatment | 药剂名称 Drug name | 药剂浓度 Agent concentration (mL/667m2) | 棉花出苗率 Cotton emergence rate(%) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 25+200 | 91.6a |
2 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 30+200 | 90.3a |
3 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 35+200 | 90.2a |
4 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 40+200 | 88.3b |
5 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 45+200 | 86.4b |
6 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 100+200 | 84.6b |
7 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 150+200 | 84.5b |
8 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 200+200 | 83.4b |
9 | 33%二甲戊灵乳油(对照药剂) | 200 | 91.5a |
10 | 清水对照 | - | 92.4a |
Table 2 Effect of each chemical treatment on cotton emergence rate
处理 Treatment | 药剂名称 Drug name | 药剂浓度 Agent concentration (mL/667m2) | 棉花出苗率 Cotton emergence rate(%) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 25+200 | 91.6a |
2 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 30+200 | 90.3a |
3 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 35+200 | 90.2a |
4 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 40+200 | 88.3b |
5 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 45+200 | 86.4b |
6 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 100+200 | 84.6b |
7 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 150+200 | 84.5b |
8 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC+33%二甲戊灵 EC | 200+200 | 83.4b |
9 | 33%二甲戊灵乳油(对照药剂) | 200 | 91.5a |
10 | 清水对照 | - | 92.4a |
处理 Treatment | 药剂名称 Drug name | 药剂浓度 Agent concentration (mL/667m2) | 出苗后After emergence(%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7 d | 15 d | 30 d | 45 d | 60 d | |||
1 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 25+200 | 73.8b | 76.8b | 78.8b | 79.7b | 88.8a |
2 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 30+200 | 81.6b | 90.6a | 90.3a | 92.6a | 94.6a |
3 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 35+200 | 84.8b | 91.8a | 91.4a | 93.8a | 94.7a |
4 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 40+200 | 88.1a | 92.7a | 93.6a | 93.7a | 94.1a |
5 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 45+200 | 90.8a | 92.5a | 93.8a | 94.8a | 95.0a |
6 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 100+200 | 94.6a | 96.6a | 94.6a | 95.6a | 95.2a |
7 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 150+200 | 95.2a | 96.5a | 95.2a | 96.3a | 98.8a |
8 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 200+200 | 97.6a | 98.6a | 98.7a | 99.5a | 98.6a |
9 | 33%二甲戊灵 EC | 200 | 60.4c | 62.8c | 76.8b | 76.4b | 82.8b |
10 | 清水对照 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Table 3 Relative control effect of each chemical treatment on cotton weeds
处理 Treatment | 药剂名称 Drug name | 药剂浓度 Agent concentration (mL/667m2) | 出苗后After emergence(%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7 d | 15 d | 30 d | 45 d | 60 d | |||
1 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 25+200 | 73.8b | 76.8b | 78.8b | 79.7b | 88.8a |
2 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 30+200 | 81.6b | 90.6a | 90.3a | 92.6a | 94.6a |
3 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 35+200 | 84.8b | 91.8a | 91.4a | 93.8a | 94.7a |
4 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 40+200 | 88.1a | 92.7a | 93.6a | 93.7a | 94.1a |
5 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 45+200 | 90.8a | 92.5a | 93.8a | 94.8a | 95.0a |
6 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 100+200 | 94.6a | 96.6a | 94.6a | 95.6a | 95.2a |
7 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 150+200 | 95.2a | 96.5a | 95.2a | 96.3a | 98.8a |
8 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 200+200 | 97.6a | 98.6a | 98.7a | 99.5a | 98.6a |
9 | 33%二甲戊灵 EC | 200 | 60.4c | 62.8c | 76.8b | 76.4b | 82.8b |
10 | 清水对照 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
处理 Treatment | 药剂名称 Drug name | 药剂浓度 Agent concentration (mL/667m2) | 杂草数量 Number of weeds (株/m2) | 株防效 Strain control effect (%) | 鲜重 Fresh weight (g/m2) | 鲜重防效 Fresh weight prevention effect(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 25+200 | 9.2 | 79.7b | 19.2 | 84.8a |
2 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 30+200 | 5.6 | 87.6a | 16.3 | 87.1a |
3 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 35+200 | 4.6 | 89.8a | 16.3 | 87.1a |
4 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 40+200 | 4.3 | 90.5a | 17.6 | 86.1a |
5 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 45+200 | 4.4 | 90.3a | 18.9 | 85.1a |
6 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 100+200 | 4.2 | 90.7a | 13.7 | 89.2a |
7 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 150+200 | 2.8 | 93.8a | 10.4 | 91.8a |
8 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 200+200 | 2.9 | 93.6a | 6.3 | 95.0a |
9 | 33%二甲戊灵 EC | 200 | 10.7 | 76.4b | 65.9 | 48.0b |
10 | 清水对照 | - | 45.3 | - | 126.7 | - |
Table 4 45 d effect of each pesticide on weeds in cotton fields
处理 Treatment | 药剂名称 Drug name | 药剂浓度 Agent concentration (mL/667m2) | 杂草数量 Number of weeds (株/m2) | 株防效 Strain control effect (%) | 鲜重 Fresh weight (g/m2) | 鲜重防效 Fresh weight prevention effect(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 25+200 | 9.2 | 79.7b | 19.2 | 84.8a |
2 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 30+200 | 5.6 | 87.6a | 16.3 | 87.1a |
3 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 35+200 | 4.6 | 89.8a | 16.3 | 87.1a |
4 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 40+200 | 4.3 | 90.5a | 17.6 | 86.1a |
5 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 45+200 | 4.4 | 90.3a | 18.9 | 85.1a |
6 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 100+200 | 4.2 | 90.7a | 13.7 | 89.2a |
7 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 150+200 | 2.8 | 93.8a | 10.4 | 91.8a |
8 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 200+200 | 2.9 | 93.6a | 6.3 | 95.0a |
9 | 33%二甲戊灵 EC | 200 | 10.7 | 76.4b | 65.9 | 48.0b |
10 | 清水对照 | - | 45.3 | - | 126.7 | - |
处理 Treatment | 药剂名称 Drug name | 药剂浓度 Agent concentration (mL/667m2) | 株数 Tree (株/667m2) | 果枝数 Number of fruit branches (枝/株) | 单铃重 Single bell weight (g) | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (kg/667m2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 25+200 | 11 320a | 8.1 | 5.23a | 479.55a |
2 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 30+200 | 11 280a | 8.2 | 5.21a | 481.90a |
3 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 35+200 | 11 060a | 8.1 | 5.25a | 470.33a |
4 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 40+200 | 11 090a | 8.1 | 5.27a | 473.40a |
5 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 45+200 | 11 060a | 8.0 | 5.22a | 461.87a |
6 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 100+200 | 11 050a | 8.0 | 5.22a | 461.45a |
7 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 150+200 | 11 030a | 8.0 | 5.20a | 458.85a |
8 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 200+200 | 11 020a | 8.0 | 5.22a | 460.20a |
9 | 33%二甲戊灵 EC | 200 | 10 470a | 8.1 | 5.20a | 441.00a |
10 | 清水对照 | - | 11 280a | 8.0 | 5.19a | 468.35a |
Table 5 Effect of each chemical treatment on cotton yield
处理 Treatment | 药剂名称 Drug name | 药剂浓度 Agent concentration (mL/667m2) | 株数 Tree (株/667m2) | 果枝数 Number of fruit branches (枝/株) | 单铃重 Single bell weight (g) | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (kg/667m2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 25+200 | 11 320a | 8.1 | 5.23a | 479.55a |
2 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 30+200 | 11 280a | 8.2 | 5.21a | 481.90a |
3 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 35+200 | 11 060a | 8.1 | 5.25a | 470.33a |
4 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 40+200 | 11 090a | 8.1 | 5.27a | 473.40a |
5 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 45+200 | 11 060a | 8.0 | 5.22a | 461.87a |
6 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 100+200 | 11 050a | 8.0 | 5.22a | 461.45a |
7 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 150+200 | 11 030a | 8.0 | 5.20a | 458.85a |
8 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 200+200 | 11 020a | 8.0 | 5.22a | 460.20a |
9 | 33%二甲戊灵 EC | 200 | 10 470a | 8.1 | 5.20a | 441.00a |
10 | 清水对照 | - | 11 280a | 8.0 | 5.19a | 468.35a |
药剂名称 Drug name | 药剂浓度 Agent concen tration (mL/667m2) | 稗草 Echin ochloa crus galli (L.) Beauv | 马唐 Digit aria sang uin alis (L.) Scop. | 狗尾草 Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv | 龙葵 Solanum nigrum L. | 反枝苋 Amaran thus retrofl exus L. | 灰藜 Chenopo dium album L. | 马齿苋 Portu laca olera cea L. | 苘麻 Abutilon theop hrasti Medicus | 田旋花 Convo lvulus arven sis L. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
42%氟啶草酮 SC | 25 | - | - | - | + | + | + | + | - | - |
42%氟啶草酮 SC | 30 | - | - | - | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | - | - |
42%氟啶草酮 SC | 35 | - | - | - | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | + | - |
42%氟啶草酮 SC | 40 | - | - | - | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | + | - |
42%氟啶草酮 SC | 45 | + | + | + | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | + | - |
42%氟啶草酮 SC | 100 | + | + | + | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | + | + |
42%氟啶草酮 SC | 150 | + | + | + | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | + | + |
42%氟啶草酮 SC | 200 | + | + | + | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | + | + |
Table 6 Evaluation of the control effect of 42% fluoxastrone suspension on various weeds
药剂名称 Drug name | 药剂浓度 Agent concen tration (mL/667m2) | 稗草 Echin ochloa crus galli (L.) Beauv | 马唐 Digit aria sang uin alis (L.) Scop. | 狗尾草 Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv | 龙葵 Solanum nigrum L. | 反枝苋 Amaran thus retrofl exus L. | 灰藜 Chenopo dium album L. | 马齿苋 Portu laca olera cea L. | 苘麻 Abutilon theop hrasti Medicus | 田旋花 Convo lvulus arven sis L. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
42%氟啶草酮 SC | 25 | - | - | - | + | + | + | + | - | - |
42%氟啶草酮 SC | 30 | - | - | - | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | - | - |
42%氟啶草酮 SC | 35 | - | - | - | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | + | - |
42%氟啶草酮 SC | 40 | - | - | - | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | + | - |
42%氟啶草酮 SC | 45 | + | + | + | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | + | - |
42%氟啶草酮 SC | 100 | + | + | + | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | + | + |
42%氟啶草酮 SC | 150 | + | + | + | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | + | + |
42%氟啶草酮 SC | 200 | + | + | + | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | + | + |
杂草名称 Weed name | 毒力回归方程 Virulence regression equation | 相关系数 Correlation coefficient | EC50 (mL/667m2) | 95%置信区间 95% confidence interval |
---|---|---|---|---|
稗草 Echin ochloa crus galli (L.) Beauv | Y=4.54x-4.39 | 0.99 | 45.57 | 40.15~50.66 |
马唐 Digit aria sanguin alis (L.) Scop | Y=4.79x-3.57 | 0.98 | 47.78 | 42.32~51.63 |
狗尾草 Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv | Y=4.24x-11.48 | 0.99 | 46.89 | 41.19~50.44 |
龙葵 Solanum nigrum L. | Y=3.27x-2.07 | 0.99 | 17.58 | 14.39~21.32 |
反枝苋 Amaranthus retroflexus L. | Y=7.58x-9.98 | 0.99 | 17.68 | 14.55~21.58 |
灰藜 Chenopodium album L. | Y=9.66x-11.23 | 0.98 | 16.87 | 13.23~20.31 |
马齿苋 Portulaca oleracea L. | Y=3.17x-2.45 | 0.98 | 16.44 | 14.17~22.67 |
苘麻 Abutilon theophrasti Medicus | Y=8.54x-14.67 | 0.97 | 48.56 | 45.69~53.18 |
田旋花 Convolvulus arvensis L. | Y=7.96x-16.56 | 0.97 | 55.49 | 49.66~61.24 |
Table 7 Herbicidal activity of 42% fluoxastrone suspension on main weeds in cotton fields
杂草名称 Weed name | 毒力回归方程 Virulence regression equation | 相关系数 Correlation coefficient | EC50 (mL/667m2) | 95%置信区间 95% confidence interval |
---|---|---|---|---|
稗草 Echin ochloa crus galli (L.) Beauv | Y=4.54x-4.39 | 0.99 | 45.57 | 40.15~50.66 |
马唐 Digit aria sanguin alis (L.) Scop | Y=4.79x-3.57 | 0.98 | 47.78 | 42.32~51.63 |
狗尾草 Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv | Y=4.24x-11.48 | 0.99 | 46.89 | 41.19~50.44 |
龙葵 Solanum nigrum L. | Y=3.27x-2.07 | 0.99 | 17.58 | 14.39~21.32 |
反枝苋 Amaranthus retroflexus L. | Y=7.58x-9.98 | 0.99 | 17.68 | 14.55~21.58 |
灰藜 Chenopodium album L. | Y=9.66x-11.23 | 0.98 | 16.87 | 13.23~20.31 |
马齿苋 Portulaca oleracea L. | Y=3.17x-2.45 | 0.98 | 16.44 | 14.17~22.67 |
苘麻 Abutilon theophrasti Medicus | Y=8.54x-14.67 | 0.97 | 48.56 | 45.69~53.18 |
田旋花 Convolvulus arvensis L. | Y=7.96x-16.56 | 0.97 | 55.49 | 49.66~61.24 |
处理 Treatment | 药剂名称 Drug name | 药剂浓度 Agent concentration (mL/667m2) | 出苗率 Emergence rate (%) | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 鲜重 Fresh weight (g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 25+200 | 94.8a | 14.8a | 10.85a |
2 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 30+200 | 94.2a | 14.7a | 10.67a |
3 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 35+200 | 94.3a | 14.3a | 10.78a |
4 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 40+200 | 90.6a | 14.4a | 10.54a |
5 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 45+200 | 89.6a | 14.5a | 10.49a |
6 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 100+200 | 85.6b | 14.6a | 10.50a |
7 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 150+200 | 85.3b | 14.2a | 10.52a |
8 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 200+200 | 84.5b | 14.3a | 10.12a |
9 | 33%二甲戊灵 EC | 200 | 94.7a | 14.1a | 10.11a |
10 | 清水对照 | - | 95.4a | 14.6a | 10.16a |
Table 8 Effects of treatments on the growth and development of cotton mixed with 42% fluoxastrone suspension and 33% pendimethalin EC
处理 Treatment | 药剂名称 Drug name | 药剂浓度 Agent concentration (mL/667m2) | 出苗率 Emergence rate (%) | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 鲜重 Fresh weight (g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 25+200 | 94.8a | 14.8a | 10.85a |
2 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 30+200 | 94.2a | 14.7a | 10.67a |
3 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 35+200 | 94.3a | 14.3a | 10.78a |
4 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 40+200 | 90.6a | 14.4a | 10.54a |
5 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 45+200 | 89.6a | 14.5a | 10.49a |
6 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 100+200 | 85.6b | 14.6a | 10.50a |
7 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 150+200 | 85.3b | 14.2a | 10.52a |
8 | 42%氟啶草酮 SC +33%二甲戊灵 EC | 200+200 | 84.5b | 14.3a | 10.12a |
9 | 33%二甲戊灵 EC | 200 | 94.7a | 14.1a | 10.11a |
10 | 清水对照 | - | 95.4a | 14.6a | 10.16a |
[1] | 张亚林, 李根源, 袁有禄, 等. 新疆喀什地区主要植棉县棉花产业现状及科技扶贫工作建议[J]. 中国棉花, 2019, 46(9):1-3,25. |
ZHANG Yanlin, LI Genyuan, YUAN Youlu, et al. The cotton industry in the main cotton-growing counties in Kashgar, Xinjiang, and suggestions for poverty alleviation by science and technology[J]. China Cotton, 2019, 46(9):1-3,25. | |
[2] | 冯琦. 石河子垦区滴灌棉田杂草的种类调查与防治[D]. 石河子,石河子大学, 2016. |
FENG Qi. Investigation and control of weed species in cotton fields under drip irrigation in Shihezi reclamation area[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2016. | |
[3] | 马小艳, 马艳, 彭军, 等. 我国棉田杂草研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 棉花学报, 2010, 22(4):372-380. |
MA Xiaoyan, MA Yan, PENG Jun, et al. Current status and development trends of cotton field weed research in China[J]. Cotton Science, 2010, 22(4):372-380. | |
[4] | 魏建华, 张建云, 马冬梅. 新疆昌吉州棉田杂草发生演替规律调查研究[J]. 中国棉花, 2016, 43(1):31-33. |
WEI Jianhua, ZHANG Jianyun, MA Dongmei. Investigation and study on weed occurrence and succession law of cotton fields in Changji Prefecture, Xinjiang[J]. China Cotton, 2016, 43(1):31-33. | |
[5] | 李欢欢, 马小艳, 姜伟丽, 等. 棉田化学除草现状及对策[J]. 中国棉花, 2019, 46(5):1-7,10. |
LI Huanhuan, MA Xiaoyan, JIANG Weili, et al. Status and countermeasures of chemical weeding in cotton fields[J]. China Cotton, 2019, 46(5):1-7,10. | |
[6] | 罗巨海, 张勇, 何海芬, 等. 北疆棉田杂草消长调查及综合治理[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2004,(S1):75-76. |
LUO Juhai, ZHANG Yong, HE Haifen, et al. Investigation and Comprehensive Management of Weed Growth and Decline in Cotton Fields in Northern Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2004,(S1):75-76. | |
[7] | 徐洪乐, 樊金星, 苏旺苍, 等. 42%氟啶草酮悬浮剂的除草活性及对棉花的安全性[J]. 中国棉花, 2018, 45(11):14-18. |
XU Hongle, FAN Jinxing, SU Jinwang, et al. Herbicidal activity of 42% fluoxastrone suspension and its safety to cotton[J]. China Cotton, 2018, 45(11):14-18. | |
[8] | 郭文磊, 王兆振, 谭金妮, 等. 氟咯草酮与二甲戊灵或乙草胺复配的联合除草作用及其对棉花的安全性[J]. 农药学学报, 2016, 18(5):605-611. |
GUO Wenlei, WANG Zhaozhen, TAN Jinni, et al. The combined herbicidal effect of flumezone and pendimethalin or acetochlor and its safety to cotton[J]. Journal of Pesticide Science, 2016, 18(5):605-611. | |
[9] | 许贤, 刘小民, 许贞贞, 等. 二甲戊灵与扑草净或异丙甲草胺复配制剂的活性和安全性测定[J]. 杂草学报, 2017, 35(3):27-33. |
XU Xian, LIU Xiaomin, XU Zhenzhen, et al. Determination of the activity and safety of the combination preparations of pendimethalin and prochloraz or metochlor[J] Journal of Weeds, 2017, 35(3):27-33. | |
[10] | 赵冰梅, 丁丽丽, 张强, 等. 42%氟啶草酮悬浮剂桶混二甲戊灵对覆膜棉田恶性杂草防除效果及安全性[J]. 中国棉花, 2018, 45(2):33-36,43. |
ZHAO Bingmei, DING Lili, ZHANG Qiang, et al. Controlling effect and safety of 42% fluoxastrone suspension-mixed pendimethalin on malignant weeds in coated cotton fields[J]. China Cotton, 2018, 45(2):33-36,43. | |
[11] | 赛丽蔓·马木提, 古海尔·买买提, 3种除草剂防治新疆博乐棉田杂草效果[J]. 中国棉花, 2014, 41(6):34-35. |
Seliman Mumti, Guhaier Mumati. Effects of 3 kinds of herbicides on weed control in Xinjiang Bole cotton field[J]. China Cotton, 2014, 41(6):34-35. | |
[12] | 蒋成国, 刘彤, 张建萍, 等. 滴灌下新疆北部棉田杂草土壤种子库的时空变化[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(6):3081-3089. |
JIANG Chengguo, LIU Tong, ZHANG Jianping, et al. Spatio-temporal changes of weed soil seed banks in cotton fields in northern Xinjiang under drip irrigation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(6):3081-3089. | |
[13] | 郑本明. 33%二甲戊灵乳油防除棉花田杂草试验[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2012,(4):78-79. |
ZHENG Benming, Experiment of 33% pendimethalin EC in controlling weeds in cotton fields[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2012(4):78-79. | |
[14] | 王恒智, 谭金妮, 吕学深, 等. 丙炔氟草胺与二甲戊灵复配的联合除草作用及对棉花的安全性[J]. 农药学学报, 2018, 20(3):309-315. |
WANG Hengzhi, TAN Jinni, LV Xueshen, et al. The combined herbicidal effect of fluroxypyr and dimethalin and its safety to cotton[J]. Journal of Pesticide Science, 2018, 20(3):309-315. | |
[15] | 张朝贤, 倪汉文, 魏守辉, 等. 杂草抗药性研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(4):1274-1289. |
ZHANG Zhaoxian, NI Hanwen, WEI Shou-hui, et al. Research progress on weed resistance[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(4):1274-1289. | |
[16] | 邱芳心, 杜桂萍, 刘开林, 等. 杂草抗药性及其治理策略研究进展[J]. 杂草科学, 2015, 33(2):1-6. |
LUO Fangxin, DU Guiping, LIU Kailin, et al. Research progress on weed resistance and its management strategies[J]. Chinese Journal of Weed Science, 2015, 33(2):1-6. |
[1] | MA Baihuan, ZHAO Qiang, XIE Jia, XU Kaiyue, REN Ruofei, SONG Xinghu. Effects of biopharmaceutical mixture on the control and growth of cotton Verticillium wilt [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1748-1756. |
[2] | GENG Songyi, SUN Hongtao, ZHAO Weiqi, WANG Mei, MA Rong. Survey of the occurrence of apple tree Valsa canker and screening of new control agents [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1461-1467. |
[3] | QIAN Tao, WU Lili, LI Lei, Anniwaer Kuerban, DING Ruifeng. Control effect of pyroxasulfone mixed with pendimethalin on broadleaf weeds in cotton filed and its safety evaluation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 861-868. |
[4] | TIAN Meng, JIA Wenjie, Nuerziya Yalimaimaiti, LUO Ying, JIA Peisong, NI Zhiyong. Population structure and geographical distribution of wild Awei mushroom compound group in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 996-1002. |
[5] | LIU Zhenya, SU Xuanle, TANG Li, JIANG Siming, LI Yapeng, DAN Hongxia, ZHANG Wangbin. Toxicity determination of Twenty-two antibiotics against oear fire blight and its safety evaluation on floral organ [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 461-468. |
[6] | MENG Zhuo, TANG Xiaowen, ZHANG Guangjie, XU Andong, YAN Yu, FU Rao, QIANG Song, JIANG Pingan, MA Deying. Effects of two application methods of insect-sand compound microbial agent on cotton growth and control of Verticillium wilt [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 2861-2871. |
[7] | LIU Huifang, WANG Qiang, HAN Hongwei, ZHUANG Hongmei, WANG Hao, CHANG Yanan. Effects of salt, alkali and complex salt alkali stress on the photosynthetic characteristics and antioxidant enzyme activity of tomato seedlings [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(11): 2658-2666. |
[8] | YANG Ni, Mayila Yusuyin, YANG Yanlong, LI Chunping, ZHANG Dawei, XU Haijiang, LAI Chengxia. Comparative analysis of plant volatiles from the Verticillium-Infected withered spot and etiolated leaves in cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1975-1986. |
[9] | WEI Yingfeng, ZHANG Quancheng, ZHA Hui, WANG Xiaoli, WANG Jungang. Effect of pendimethalin on the main growth and development and physiological indicators of Solanum nigrum L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 2013-2021. |
[10] | XU Chang, ZHANG Guangdi, ZHANG Haoyu, JIA Yinan, ZHANG Kunming, WANG Jianglong, HOU Xiaojian. Studies on Volatile Organic Compounds of Muscat Hamburg Berry Treated by Foliar Spraying Silicon during the Growing Period [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 359-367. |
[11] | ZHANG Hao, LIU Yi, ZHOU Bo, HUANG Yuan, FU Xiaofa, MA Yue, WU Haibo, HU Guozhi, MAO Jiancai, CHEN Jihao, LIANG Qigan, WANG Min. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on aromatic compounds of muskmelon [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(12): 2993-3007. |
[12] | WU Lili, QIAN Tao, CHEN Yan, Wumaierjiang Baikeli, LI Guangkuo, DING Ruifeng. Control effects of pendimethalin and flumioxazin to annual weeds in cotton field [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2790-2797. |
[13] | ZHANG Lifang, LI Zhiyuan, QIN Yong. Effects of Different Compound Substrates on the Growth and Quality of Herba schizonepetae in Pots [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(1): 150-160. |
[14] | XU Junfeng, YANG Rong, ZHAN Faqiang, HOU Min, BAO Huifang, WANG Ning, LONG Xuanqi, ZHANG Zhidong, CUI Weidong. Screening of Functional Bacteria of Organic-Inorganic Liquid Compound Fertilizers and Its Effect on the Quality and Physiological Activity of Greenhouse Tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(7): 1758-1766. |
[15] | HE Wei, LUO Wenfang, YU Zhenhua, XU Jianjun, SUN Xiaojun. Growth Promoting Effect and Safety Evaluation of Bacillus velezensis JTB8-2 on Processed Tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1260-1269. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||