Effects of two application methods of insect-sand compound microbial agent on cotton growth and control of Verticillium wilt

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.12.001

Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (12): 2861-2871.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.12.001

• Germplasm Resources · Molecular Genetics. Cultivation Physiology · Physiology and Biochemistry Microbes • Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of two application methods of insect-sand compound microbial agent on cotton growth and control of Verticillium wilt

MENG Zhuo¹^,²^,³(), TANG Xiaowen¹^,³, ZHANG Guangjie¹^,²^,³, XU Andong¹^,³, YAN Yu¹^,³, FU Rao¹^,³, QIANG Song¹^,²^,³, JIANG Pingan²(), MA Deying¹^,²^,³()

1. College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
2. Cotton Engineering Research Center of Ministry of Education, College of Agriculture,Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
3. Key Laboratory of Monitoring and Safety Prevention and Control of Agricultural and Forest Pests/ College of Agriculture Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China

Received:2024-04-21 Online:2024-12-20 Published:2025-01-16
Correspondence author: JIANG Pingan, MA Deying
Supported by:
Key Scientific R & D Program Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(2022B02046);Project of College Students' Innovation Training Program(dxscx2022010)

虫砂复合微生物菌剂2种施用方式对棉花生长发育及防控黄萎病的影响

孟卓¹^,²^,³(), 唐小雯¹^,³, 张广杰¹^,²^,³, 徐安东¹^,³, 颜宇¹^,³, 付娆¹^,³, 羌松¹^,²^,³, 蒋平安²(), 马德英¹^,²^,³()

1.新疆农业大学农学院,乌鲁木齐 830052
2.新疆农业大学教育部棉花工程研究中心,乌鲁木齐 830052
3.新疆农业大学农林业有害生物监测与安全防控重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830052

通讯作者: 蒋平安,马德英
作者简介:孟卓(1998-),女,新疆博乐人,硕士研究生,研究方向为棉花黄萎病绿色防控,(E-mail)1349641389@qq.com
基金资助:
新疆维吾尔自治区重点研发计划项目(2022B02046);大学生创新训练计划项目(dxscx2022010)

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 In order to explore the green control technology of cotton Verticillium wilt, the effects of two different application methods on cotton growth and control of verticillium wilt under the synergistic effect of Protaetia brevitarsis worm dung-sand and microbial agents will be clarified, in the hope of providing scheme reference for green control of the cotton disease and sustainable development of cotton industry.【Methods】 Four treatments of larvae dung-sand combined with Bacillus subtilis (LD-KC), Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (LD-JDF), Trichoderma harzianum (LD-HC) and Zhongmian Junletu (LD-ZM) were set up, and total base fertilizer of the larvae dung-sand combined with microbial agents (TBF) and base fertilizer of larvae dung-sand+dressing microbial agents (BF+DBM) were used respectively.【Results】 The growth and development indexes of cotton in BF+DBM group (plant height, stem diameter, first node of fruit branches, etc.) were better than those in TBF group, with LD-JDF and LD-ZM performing better. The yield increase of seed cotton in BF+DBM group was significantly higher than those in TBF group and control group (CK). The yield increase of seed cotton in BF+DBM group was 24.37%-33.40%. The highest yield increase was achieved in LD-JDF group (33.40%), followed by LD-HC (31.10%). In the early stage of Verticillium wilt, the disease index of TBF group was 3.80-5.85, the disease index of LD-JDF treatment was higher, reaching 44.36%, the disease index of BF+DBM group was 2.50-5.33, the disease index of LD-HC treatment was the lowest, and the prevention effect was 63.40%. In the late stage of Verticillium wilt, the disease indexes of TBF group and BF+DBM group were between 27.00-31.67 and 21.67-30.83, respectively, and JDF had the highest control effect, reaching 19.00% and 34.98% respectively.【Conclusion】 During the whole growth period of cotton, the basic application of larvae dung-sand combined with semi-quantitative biocontrol bacteria plus semi-quantitative biocontrol bacteria topdressing can effectively promote the growth and development of cotton, and has a good control effect on cotton Verticillium wilt, and the effect of increasing production is more obvious. LD-JDF has the best effect of increasing production, and base fertilizer of larvae dung-sand+dressing biocontrol microorganisms.

Key words: Verticillium dahliae; biological control; insect-microorganisms compound; application mode; prevent diseases and increase production

摘要：

【目的】 通过白星花金龟虫砂与黄萎病生防菌相结合,研究棉花黄萎病绿色防控技术,分析两者协同作用下不同施用方式对棉花生长发育及防控黄萎病的影响,为棉花黄萎病的绿色防控和棉花产业可持续发展提供参考。【方法】 设置虫砂复合枯草芽孢杆菌(LD-KC)、解淀粉芽孢杆菌(LD-JDF)、哈茨木霉(LD-HC)、中棉菌乐土(LD-ZM)4种组合,分别以虫砂复合生防菌全量基施(TBF)和虫砂基施+生防菌追施(BF+DBM)2种方式施入田间,在棉花全生育期测量生长发育和产量指标,在黄萎病发病期调查棉花黄萎病病情指数。【结果】 BF+DBM组的棉花生长发育指标(株高、茎粗、果枝始节高等)优于TBF组,以LD-JDF和LD-ZM表现较好;BF+DBM组籽棉增产效果明显,显著高于TBF组和对照组(CK),BF+DBM籽棉增产在24.37%~33.40%,LD-JDF组增产最高,增产率达33.40%,其次为LD-HC,增产率为31.10%。黄萎病发生初期,TBF组的病情指数在3.80~5.85,LD-JDF处理对棉花黄萎病的防效较高,达到44.36%,BF+DBM组病情指数在2.50~5.33,LD-HC处理下的病情指数最低,防效为63.40%,黄萎病发生后期,TBF组和BF+DBM组病情指数分别在27.00~31.67、21.67~30.83,均为JDF防效最高,分别达到19.00%、34.98%。【结论】 在棉花整个生育期内,虫砂基施+生防菌追施能有效促进棉花的生长发育,对棉花黄萎病的防治效果较佳,且增产效果较为显著,以LD-JDF增产效果最佳,虫砂基施和生防追施相结合的施用方式。

关键词: 棉花黄萎病, 生物防治, 虫菌复合, 施用方式, 防病增产

CLC Number:

S435.62

MENG Zhuo, TANG Xiaowen, ZHANG Guangjie, XU Andong, YAN Yu, FU Rao, QIANG Song, JIANG Pingan, MA Deying. Effects of two application methods of insect-sand compound microbial agent on cotton growth and control of Verticillium wilt[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 2861-2871.

孟卓, 唐小雯, 张广杰, 徐安东, 颜宇, 付娆, 羌松, 蒋平安, 马德英. 虫砂复合微生物菌剂2种施用方式对棉花生长发育及防控黄萎病的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(12): 2861-2871.

Figures/Tables 10

References 26

[1]	Wei F, Fan R, Dong H T, et al. Threshold microsclerotial inoculum for cotton Verticillium wilt determined through wet-sieving and real-time quantitative PCR[J]. Phytopathology, 2015, 105(2): 220-229. DOI PMID
[2]	蔡利华, 练文明, 邰红忠, 等. 新疆地区棉花生育期揭膜与否对黄萎病发生的影响[J]. 棉花科学, 2021, 43(4): 58-62, 72.
	CAI Lihua, LIAN Wenming, TAI Hongzhong, et al. Effect of film-uncovering or not during cotton growth period on the Verticillium wilt in Xinjiang[J]. Cotton Sciences, 2021, 43(4): 58-62, 72.
[3]	王珏. 棉花黄萎病发病成因与预防治理策略的经济效益[J]. 中国纤检, 2022,(7): 47-50.
	WANG Jue. Occurrence characteristics and control strategies of cotton blight and Verticillium wilt in northern Xinjiang[J]. China Fiber Inspection, 2022,(7): 47-50.
[4]	蒲丹丹, 张亚林, 白红燕, 等. 内生真菌简青霉CEF-818对棉花黄萎病的防治效果及机理[J]. 棉花学报, 2022, 34(4): 313-324. DOI
	PU Dandan, ZHANG Yalin, BAI Hongyan, et al. Control effect and mechanism of endophytic fungus Penicillium simplicissimum CEF-818 on cotton Verticillium wilt[J]. Cotton Science, 2022, 34(4): 313-324.
[5]	白红燕. 枯草芽孢杆菌EBS03防治棉花黄萎病效果评测及培养条件优化[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2022.
	BAI Hongyan. Evaluation on the effect of Bacillus subtilis EBS03 in controlling cotton Verticillium wilt and optimization of culture conditions[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2022.
[6]	白红燕, 冯自力, 冯鸿杰, 等. 48株枯草芽孢杆菌对棉花黄萎病防治效果评测[J]. 中国棉花, 2021, 48(12): 13-19. DOI
	BAI Hongyan, FENG Zili, FENG Hongjie, et al. Evaluation of the control effect of 48 strains of Bacillus subtilis on cotton Verticillium wilt[J]. China Cotton, 2021, 48(12): 13-19. DOI
[7]	刘璐. 对节白蜡内生细菌YZU-SG146对棉花黄萎病生防作用机制的研究[D]. 荆州: 长江大学, 2021.
	LIU Lu. Study on the biological control mechanism of endophytic bacteria YZU-SG146 against cotton Verticillium wilt[D]. Jingzhou: Yangtze University, 2021.
[8]	Zabihullah Sherzad, 杨娜, 张静, 等. 棉花内生解淀粉芽孢杆菌489-2-2对棉花黄萎病的防效研究[J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35(1): 41-48. DOI
	SHERZAD Z, YANG Na, ZHANG Jing, et al. Study on the control effect of endophytic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens 489-2-2 on Verticillium wilt of cotton[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(1): 41-48.
[9]	邱媛媛. 两株芽孢杆菌提高棉花黄萎病抗性与促生作用的机制的研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2021.
	QIU Yuanyuan. Study on the mechanism of two Bacillus strains improving cotton Verticillium wilt resistance and promoting growth[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2021.
[10]	Berg G, Fritze A, Roskot N, et al. Evaluation of potential biocontrol rhizobacteria from different host plants of Verticillium dahliae Kleb[J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2001, 91(6): 963-971. PMID
[11]	Bubici G, Marsico A D, D’Amico M, et al. Evaluation of Streptomyces spp. for the biological control of corky root of tomato and Verticillium wilt of eggplant[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2013, 72: 128-134.
[12]	Han Q, Wu F L, Wang X N, et al. The bacterial lipopeptide iturins induce Verticillium dahliae cell death by affecting fungal signalling pathways and mediate plant defence responses involved in pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2015, 17(4): 1166-1188. DOI PMID
[13]	Li Z F, Wang L F, Feng Z L, et al. Diversity of endophytic fungi from different Verticillium-wilt-resistant Gossypium hirsutum and evaluation of antifungal activity against Verticillium dahliae in vitro[J]. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2014, 24(9): 1149-1161.
[14]	王静怡, 佐长赓, 牛新湘, 等. 生防菌在棉田土壤中定殖数量与防病作用相关性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 178-184. DOI
	WANG Jingyi, ZUO Changgeng, NIU Xinxiang, et al. The quantity and activity of biocontrol bacteria in cotton field soil and the correlation of disease prevention[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(1): 178-184. DOI
[15]	张国漪, 丁传雨, 任丽轩, 等. 菌根真菌和死谷芽孢杆菌生物有机肥对连作棉花黄萎病的协同抑制[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2012, 35(6): 68-74.
	ZHANG Guoyi, DING Chuanyu, REN Lixuan, et al. The synergetic inhibition effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi cooperated Bacillus vallismortis organic fertilizer on cotton Verticillium wilt[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2012, 35(6): 68-74.
[16]	朱荷琴, 李志芳, 冯自力, 等. 我国棉花黄萎病研究十年回顾及展望[J]. 棉花学报, 2017, 29(S1): 37-50.
	ZHU Heqin, LI Zhifang, FENG Zili, et al. Overview of cotton Verticillium wilt research over the past decade in China and its prospect in future[J]. Cotton Science, 2017, 29(S1): 37-50.
[17]	刘海洋, 王伟, 张仁福, 等. 利用生防菌防治棉花黄萎病效果的制约因素[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(1): 155-161. DOI
	LIU Haiyang, WANG Wei, ZHANG Renfu, et al. A brief analysis of the factors restricting the effectiveness of controlling cotton Verticillium wilt by using biocontrol bacteria in the field[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(1): 155-161. DOI
[18]	张广杰. 虫菌复合技术转化棉秆还田对棉花生长发育及黄萎病发生的影响[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2022.
	ZHANG Guangjie. Effect of insect-fungus compound technology on cotton growth and Verticillium wilt[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2022.
[19]	张广杰, 王倩, 刘玉升. 白星花金龟人为条件生物学与应用潜力[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2020, 42(2): 257-266.
	ZHANG Guangjie, WANG Qian, LIU Yusheng. Biology under artificial condition and utilization potential of Potosia brevitarsis (Coleoptera: Cetoniidea)[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2020, 42(2): 257-266.
[20]	Zhang G J, Meng Z, Ge H, et al. Investigating Verticillium wilt occurrence in cotton and its risk management by the direct return of cotton plants infected with Verticillium dahliae to the field[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2023, 14: 1220921.
[21]	Zhang G J, Xu Y S, Zhang S, et al. Transformation capability optimization and product application potential of proteatia brevitarsis (Coleoptera: Cetoniidae) larvae on cotton stalks[J]. Insects, 2022, 13(12): 1083.
[22]	李俊, 徐艳琪, 刘肖肖. 枯草芽孢杆菌FXX-3对棉花的促生作用[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2017,(8): 100-101.
	LI Jun, XU Yanqi, LIU Xiaoxiao. Effect of Bacillus subtilis FXX-3 on cotton growth promotion[J]. Agricultural Development & Equipments, 2017,(8): 100-101.
[23]	史长旭, 张广杰, 徐业山, 等. 白星花金龟虫粪砂混配基质对黄瓜和辣椒育苗效果的影响[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2021, 44(6): 443-447.
	SHI Changxu, ZHANG Guangjie, XU Yeshan, et al. Effects of Protaetia brevitarsis lewis larvae dung-sand mixture matrix on cucumber and pepper seedling[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2021, 44(6): 443-447.
[24]	李红丽, 李清飞, 郭夏丽, 等. 调节土壤微生态防治烟草青枯病[J]. 河南农业科学, 2006, 35(2): 57-60. DOI
	LI Hongli, LI Qingfei, GUO Xiali, et al. A report of investigating and studying tobacco infectious diseases of 16 main tobacco producing provinces(regions)in China[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2006, 35(2): 57-60.
[25]	陈英化, 李爱霞, 冯丽娜, 等. 棉花黄萎病内生拮抗细菌L-4-2的鉴定及定殖[J]. 西北农业学报, 2012, 21(2): 68-71.
	CHEN Yinghua, LI Aixia, FENG Lina, et al. Identification and colonization of an antagonistic endophytic bacterium L-4-2 against cotton Verticillium wilt[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2012, 21(2): 68-71.
[26]	匡志豪, 王典, 云菲, 等. 哈茨木霉施用方式对烟草生长、黑胫病防治及诱导抗性的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2023, 55(2): 119-126.
	KUANG Zhihao, WANG Dian, YUN Fei, et al. Effect of Trichoderma harzianum application method on tobacco growth, black shank control and inducing resistance[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 55(2): 119-126.

处理 Treatments		7月1日 July 1st		7月28日 July 28th		8月11日 August 11th		8月30日 The 30th of August
处理 Treatments		病情指数 Disease index	防效 Anti- efficiency (%)	病情指数 Disease index	防效 Anti- efficiency (%)	病情指数 Disease index	防效 Anti- efficiency (%)	病情指数 Disease index	防效 Anti- efficiency (%)
基施 TBF	LD-KC	5.85±0.83^a	14.35	10.50±1.44^a	25.90	13.87±1.44^a	24.35	31.67±3.33^a	5.00
	LD-JDF	3.80±1.44^a	44.36	6.67±2.20^a	52.93	13.50±3.82^a	26.36	27.00±0.00^a	19.00
	LD-HC	5.00±3.82^a	26.79	11.33±0.83^a	20.04	15.00±1.44^a	18.18	29.17±2.20^a	12.50
	LD-ZM	5.83±0.83^a	14.59	10.83±3.33^a	23.57	15.00±2.50^a	18.18	30.83±3.33^a	7.50
追施 BF+ DBM	LD-KC	5.33±0.83^a	21.96	9.17±0.83^a	35.29	12.83±1.74^a	30.01	30.83±2.64^a	7.50
	LD-JDF	3.17±0.83^a	53.59	10.33±2.20^a	23.53	10.83±1.67^a	40.92	21.67±3.00^a	34.98
	LD-HC	2.50±0.00^a	63.40	8.33±0.83^a	41.18	10.83±2.20^a	40.92	25±2.33^a	24.99
	LD-ZM	3.33±2.20^a	51.24	10.00±2.5^a	29.41	11.50±3.81^a	37.26	25±2.33^a	24.99
	LD	3.17±1.67^a	38.99	11.44±0.83^a	19.22	13.67±4.17^a	25.45	29.67±0.83^a	11.00
	CK	6.83±0.00^a	-	14.17±3.46^a	-	18.33±2.20^a	-	33.33±2.20^a	-

处理 Treatments		7月1日 July 1st		7月28日 July 28th		8月11日 August 11th		8月30日 The 30th of August
处理 Treatments		病情指数 Disease index	防效 Anti- efficiency (%)	病情指数 Disease index	防效 Anti- efficiency (%)	病情指数 Disease index	防效 Anti- efficiency (%)	病情指数 Disease index	防效 Anti- efficiency (%)
基施 TBF	LD-KC	5.85±0.83^a	14.35	10.50±1.44^a	25.90	13.87±1.44^a	24.35	31.67±3.33^a	5.00
	LD-JDF	3.80±1.44^a	44.36	6.67±2.20^a	52.93	13.50±3.82^a	26.36	27.00±0.00^a	19.00
	LD-HC	5.00±3.82^a	26.79	11.33±0.83^a	20.04	15.00±1.44^a	18.18	29.17±2.20^a	12.50
	LD-ZM	5.83±0.83^a	14.59	10.83±3.33^a	23.57	15.00±2.50^a	18.18	30.83±3.33^a	7.50
追施 BF+ DBM	LD-KC	5.33±0.83^a	21.96	9.17±0.83^a	35.29	12.83±1.74^a	30.01	30.83±2.64^a	7.50
	LD-JDF	3.17±0.83^a	53.59	10.33±2.20^a	23.53	10.83±1.67^a	40.92	21.67±3.00^a	34.98
	LD-HC	2.50±0.00^a	63.40	8.33±0.83^a	41.18	10.83±2.20^a	40.92	25±2.33^a	24.99
	LD-ZM	3.33±2.20^a	51.24	10.00±2.5^a	29.41	11.50±3.81^a	37.26	25±2.33^a	24.99
	LD	3.17±1.67^a	38.99	11.44±0.83^a	19.22	13.67±4.17^a	25.45	29.67±0.83^a	11.00
	CK	6.83±0.00^a	-	14.17±3.46^a	-	18.33±2.20^a	-	33.33±2.20^a	-

处理 Treatments		出苗率 Seedling emergence rate(%)	单株铃数 Number of cotton bells per plant	单铃重 Single boll weight(g)	单产 Yield per (kg/667m²)	增产率 Rate of growth(%)
基施 TBF	LD-KC	81.94±6.06^a	5.10±0.40^ab	6.34±0.67^a	372.97±4.76^a	4.82
	LD-JDF	83.33±4.81^a	5.37±0.51^ab	5.67±0.19^a	386.25±1.25^a	8.56
	LD-HC	76.39±5.01^a	4.70±0.63^b	5.67±0.19^a	376.35±15.95^a	5.77
	LD-ZM	83.33±4.17^a	5.07±0.63^ab	5.67±0.00^a	365.29±22.24^a	2.66
追施 BF+DBM	LD-KC	86.11±6.05^a	6.10±0.35^ab	5.67±0.19^a	454.13±11.34^a	27.63
	LD-JDF	83.33±4.17^a	6.13±0.47^ab	5.78±0.40^a	474.66±8.36^a	33.40
	LD-HC	76.39±9.11^a	5.07±0.50^ab	5.55±0.22^a	466.45±7.47^a	31.10
	LD-ZM	78.05±2.11^a	6.57±0.40^a	5.44±0.11^a	442.53±7.50^a	24.37
	LD	86.33±1.39^a	5.90±0.49^ab	5.64±0.11^a	390.84±8.64^a	9.85
	CK	71.73±3.93^a	4.83±0.38^ab	5.78±0.22^a	355.81±24.67	-

处理 Treatments		出苗率 Seedling emergence rate(%)	单株铃数 Number of cotton bells per plant	单铃重 Single boll weight(g)	单产 Yield per (kg/667m²)	增产率 Rate of growth(%)
基施 TBF	LD-KC	81.94±6.06^a	5.10±0.40^ab	6.34±0.67^a	372.97±4.76^a	4.82
	LD-JDF	83.33±4.81^a	5.37±0.51^ab	5.67±0.19^a	386.25±1.25^a	8.56
	LD-HC	76.39±5.01^a	4.70±0.63^b	5.67±0.19^a	376.35±15.95^a	5.77
	LD-ZM	83.33±4.17^a	5.07±0.63^ab	5.67±0.00^a	365.29±22.24^a	2.66
追施 BF+DBM	LD-KC	86.11±6.05^a	6.10±0.35^ab	5.67±0.19^a	454.13±11.34^a	27.63
	LD-JDF	83.33±4.17^a	6.13±0.47^ab	5.78±0.40^a	474.66±8.36^a	33.40
	LD-HC	76.39±9.11^a	5.07±0.50^ab	5.55±0.22^a	466.45±7.47^a	31.10
	LD-ZM	78.05±2.11^a	6.57±0.40^a	5.44±0.11^a	442.53±7.50^a	24.37
	LD	86.33±1.39^a	5.90±0.49^ab	5.64±0.11^a	390.84±8.64^a	9.85
	CK	71.73±3.93^a	4.83±0.38^ab	5.78±0.22^a	355.81±24.67	-

Effects of two application methods of insect-sand compound microbial agent on cotton growth and control of Verticillium wilt

虫砂复合微生物菌剂2种施用方式对棉花生长发育及防控黄萎病的影响

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 26

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles 0

Metrics

[1]	YUAN Zihan, ZHAO Wenhui, WANG Xiaowu, Tuerxun Ahemaiti, DING Xinhua, ZHANG Shuai, FU Kaiyun, JIA Zunzun, GUO Wenchao. Screening of Corn Stalk Rot control bacteria and evaluation of control effects [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 35-48.
[2]	GENG Songyi, SUN Hongtao, ZHAO Weiqi, WANG Mei, MA Rong. Survey of the occurrence of apple tree Valsa canker and screening of new control agents [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1461-1467.
[3]	CAO Zhujun, ZHANG Zhenyu, KANG Ning, ZHAO Qian, HU Hongying. Research of parasitoids of Sphaerolecanium prunastri fonscolombe in the western Tianshan wild fruit forest [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 971-983.
[4]	CHEN Rong, LAI Ning, GENG Qinglong, LI Yongfu, XIN Huinan, LYU Caixia, LI Na, CHEN Shuhuang. Study on variable nitrogen fertilization model of winter wheat during booting period based on remote sensing data [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(11): 2705-2712.
[5]	YANG Haitao, XI Ouyan, ZHAO Qian, CAO Zhujun, HU Hongying. Investigation of parasitoids of Didesmococcus koreanus Borchsenius [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2273-2280.
[6]	WEN Xia, TIAN Lichao, GAO Guizhen. Functional response of Chilomenes quadriplagiata to Tinocallis kahawaluokalani [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2266-2272.
[7]	WANG Jingyi, ZUO Changgeng, NIU Xinxiang, YANG Hongmei, CHU Min, WANG Ning, LIN Qing, WANG Youwu, LOU Kai, SHI Yingwu. The Quantity and Activity of Biocontrol Bacteria in Cotton Field Soil and the Correlation of Disease Prevention [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(1): 178-184.
[8]	ZHAO Yingying, ZHANG Jungao, LI Jin, LIANG Jing, GAO Xiangyu, GU Aixing, LIE Bin. Preliminary Study on the Synergistic Effects of Bacillus subtilis KXZ-33 and Chemical Pesticides against Cotton Fusarium wilt [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1216-1222.
[9]	LI Yanbing, GUO Xiaohu, Nuershiwake Adalbieke, Patima Wumuerhan, MA Deying. Effects of Artificial Migration of Harmonia Axyridis and Chemical Control on the Control Effect of Cotton Aphid and the Population Dynamics of Natural Enemies [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1173-1179.
[10]	LIU Haiyang, WANG Wei, ZHANG Renfu, Wenqiemu Abulizi, YAO Ju. A Brief Analysis of the Factors Restricting the Effectiveness of Controlling Cotton Verticillium wilt by Using Biocontrol Bacteria in the Field [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(1): 155-161.
[11]	LIU Haiyang, WANG Wei, ZHANG Renfu, Wenqiemu Abulizi, YAO Ju. Quantitative Characteristics of Microsclerotia of Verticillium dahliae in Cotton Field Soil under Different Factors [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(3): 522-531.
[12]	LAI Chengxia, Mayila Yusuyin, SHI Bixian, LI Chunping, JIANG Mengzhu, ZHENG Zipiao, YANG Dong. Application Study on the Adjuvant Jijian as Synergist for Cotton Verticillium Disease Control [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(12): 2220-2227.
[13]	DU Pengcheng , LIU Haiyang, ZHANG Jungao, LI Jin, ZHOU Xiaoyun, LIU Mengli, LEI Bin, GUO Qingyuan. Screening and Identification of Biocontrol Bacteria against Cotton Root Rot Diseases at Seedling Stage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(4): 686-693.
[14]	LI Xue-ling , LUO Yan-liang, LI Hui, XIE Xin, MA Ruo-han, LIU Yong-Jian, WANG Pei-ling, LU Yan-hui. Regulation and Control Effects of Suaeda Strips on the Population Occurrence of Hippomidia variegata in Cotton Fields [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(1): 13-22.
[15]	ZHU Dan, LU Jia-xiong, ZHONG Wen, LI Qin, GUO Wen-chao, HU Hong-ying. An Investigation into the Parasitic Wasps as Natural Enemies of Colorado Potato Beetle in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 54(12): 2248-2254.