Comparison on Characteristic Parameters of Photosynthesis Diurnal Variation and Light Response Curve of 5 Grape Cultivars under ‘V’ Shaped Casserole

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.01.013

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 To compare the photosynthetic capacity of five grape cultivars and provide theoretical basis for the selection and formulation of scientific field management techniques. 【Method】 Krissen, Xinyu, Flame Seedless, Jumeigui and Sapphire under the "V" shape cultivation mode were used as test materials to determine their diurnal variation trend of photosynthesis characteristic parameters and Pn - light response curve. 【Results】 Among the 5 grape cultivars, the Pn diurnal variation of Crimson, Xinyu and Jumeigui had a single peak, which showed a gradual downward trend, namely, higher in the morning and lower in the afternoon. There were double peaks in Pn diurnal variation of Flame Seedless and Sapphire, both of which showed "midday depression" caused by high temperature and strong light (stomatal factors) at noon. The daily average Pn values of 5 grape cultivars were Crimson (8.395±3.541)μmol/(m ²·s), Xinyu (9.303±2.643)μmol/(m²·s), Flame Seedless(8.796±3.588)μmol/(m²·s), Jumeigui (8.043±2.614)μmol/(m²·s), Sapphire (8.002±4.157)μmol/(m²·s). Among the characteristic parameters of Pn - light response curves of 5 grape cultivars, the light compensation point (LCP) ranged from 51.0 to 78.0 μmol/(m²·s), among which Xinyu and Sapphire had higher LCP, and the other 3 cultivars had lower LCP than 60.0 μmol/(m²·s); Sapphire had the highest light saturation point (LSP), which was 1,582.2 μmol/(m²·s), followed by Xinyu, and the LSP of Crimson was the lowest, which was 1,151.9 μmol/(m²·s). 【Conclusion】 All of the 5 grape cultivars planted in Yutian County showed better photosynthetic adaptability, and their daily average values of water use efficiency (WUE) of the 5 grape cultivars were ranked as follows: Crimson > Flame Seedless > Sapphire > Xinyu > Jumeigui.

Key words: grape; diurnal variation of photosynthesis; light response curve; photosynthetic characteristic parameters

摘要：

【目的】比较5个葡萄品种光合能力,为其合理选(引)种和科学田间管理技术的制定提供理论依据。【方法】以克瑞森、新郁、火焰无核、巨玫瑰和蓝宝石为试材,测定‘V’形架栽培模式下5个葡萄品种的光合日变化趋势及光合速率(Pn)-光响应曲线特征参数。【结果】5个葡萄品种Pn日变化中,克瑞森、新郁、巨玫瑰均有单峰,均呈上午高下午低的逐渐下降趋势,火焰无核和蓝宝石均有双峰,均呈因中午的高温和强光(气孔因素)而导致的“午休现象”,5个葡萄品种Pn日平均值分别为克瑞森(8.395±3.541)μmol/(m²·s)、新郁(9.303±2.643)μmol/(m²·s)、火焰无核(8.796±3.588)μmol/(m²·s)、巨玫瑰(8.043±2.614)μmol/(m²·s)、蓝宝石(8.002±4.157)μmol/(m²·s)。5个葡萄品种Pn-光响应曲线特征参数中,光补偿点(LCP)在(51.0~78.0)μmol/(m²·s)范围内,其中新郁和蓝宝石的LCP均较高,其它3个品种的LCP均低于60.0 μmol/(m²·s)以下;蓝宝石的光饱和点(LSP)最高,为1 582.2 μmol/(m²·s),其次为新郁,克瑞森的LSP最低,为1 151.9 μmol/(m²·s)。【结论】5个葡萄品种在于田县的光合适应性均比较好,其光合水分利用效率(WUE)日平均值由大到小排序为克瑞森>火焰无核>蓝宝石>新郁>巨玫瑰。

关键词: 葡萄, 光合日变化, 光响应曲线, 光合特征参数

CLC Number:

S663.1

Adil Hekim, Muhtar Zari, Roxangul Mahmut, WANG Baoqing. Comparison on Characteristic Parameters of Photosynthesis Diurnal Variation and Light Response Curve of 5 Grape Cultivars under ‘V’ Shaped Casserole[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(1): 105-112.

阿地力·衣克木, 木合塔尔·扎热, 茹先古丽·买合木提, 王宝庆. ‘V’形架式下5个鲜食葡萄品种光合日变化和光响应曲线特征参数比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(1): 105-112.

Figures/Tables 8

References 26

[1]	张玉星. 果树栽培学各论[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003.
	ZHANG Yuxing. Pomology cultivator[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2003.
[2]	骆萌, 王杰, 李玉玲, 等. “新郁”葡萄离体再生体系的建立[J]. 北方园艺, 2016, (9):109-113.
	LUO Meng, WANG Jie, LI Yuling, et al. Establishment of regeneration system of‘Xinyu' Grapevinein vitro[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2016,(9):109-113.
[3]	马千里, 田英姿, 英犁, 等. 模糊综合评价法在新疆葡萄质量评价分析中的应用[J]. 现代食品科技, 2015, 31(2):179-183.
	MA Qianli, TIAN Yingzi, YING Li, et al. Evaluation of the quality of Xinjiang grapes with fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model[J]. Modern Food Science and Technology, 2015, 31(2):179-183.
[4]	Joel A, Iago Q, Gabriela P, et al. Antioxidant capacity, phenolic compound content and sensory properties of cookies produced from organic grape peel (Vitis labrusca) flour[J]. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 2019, 54(4):1215-1224.
[5]	Trilícia M G, Isabela M T, Isabel C S H, et al. Differential contribution of grape peel, pulp, and seed to bioaccessibility of micronutrients and major polyphenolic compounds of red and white grapes through simulated human digestion[J]. Journal of Functional Foods, 2019, 52:699-708. DOI URL
[6]	新疆统计年鉴委员会. 新疆统计年鉴[J]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2020.
	Xinjiang Statistical Yearbook Committee. Xinjiang statistical yearbook[J]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2020.
[7]	Poni S, Casalini L, Bernizzoni F, et al. Effects of early defoliation on shoot photosynjournal, yield components, and grape composition[J]. American Journal of Enology & Viticulture, 2006, 57(4):397-407.
[8]	韩多红, 周德峰, 孟好军. 干旱荒漠区早酥和红早酥梨夏季光合作用日变化规律研究[J]. 河南农业科学, 2020, 49(4):120-123.
	HAN Duohong, ZHOU Defeng, MENG Haojun. Diurnal variation of photosynjournal of Zaosu and Hongzaosu pears in summer in arid desert area[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 49(4):120-123.
[9]	Ji W, Sun F, Luo Q, et al. Photosynthetic responses of a new grapevine variety ’Xinyu’ in Turpan[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2015, 30(5):79-85.
[10]	苏学德, 李铭, 郭绍杰, 等. 水肥耦合对干旱区滴灌克瑞森葡萄光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2015, 34(S1):1-5.
	SU Xuede, LI Ming, GUO Shaojie, et al. Effect of water and fertilizer coupling on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of crimson seedless grape under drip irrigation in arid region[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2015, 34(S1):1-5.
[11]	Wei M, Niu Y, Luo Q, et al. Differences of photosynthetic characteristics of the grape cultivated in greenhouse and open field in Turpan[J]. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2016, 17(6):1285-1288.
[12]	金莉, 周琦, 李长林, 等. 巨玫瑰和辽峰2个葡萄品种叶片光合日变化及其与环境因子的相关性[J]. 西北农业学报, 2015, (7):92-97.
	JIN Li, ZHOU Qi, LI Changlin, et al. Diurnal variation environmental of leave photosynjournal rate and correlation with factors in grape cultivar Jumeigui and Liaofeng[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2015(7):92-97.
[13]	金莉, 李长林, 宿福园, 等. 巨玫瑰葡萄叶片光合日变化及其与环境因子的相关性研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2015, 28(2):768-771.
	JIN Li, LI Changlin, SU Fuyuan, et al. Studies on diurnal variation of photosynjournal rate in leaves of ‘Jumeigui’ and correlation with environmental factors[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 28(2):768-771.
[14]	邢燕江. 尉犁县种植蓝宝石葡萄气候适宜性分析[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2019, (12):20-22.
	XING Yanjiang. Climate suitability analysis of sapphire grape planting in Lopnur County[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Reclamation Science and Technology, 2019 (12):20-22.
[15]	Farquhar G D, Caemmerer S V, Berry J A. Models of photosynjournal[J]. Plant Physiology, 2001, 125:42-45. PMID
[16]	Massai R, Remorirfi D, Tattini M. Gas exchange, water relations and osmotic adjustment in two scion/rootstock combinations of Prunus, under various salinity concentrations[J]. Plant and Soil, 2004, 259(1):153-162. DOI URL
[17]	王博, 种培芳, 李毅, 等. 2种晚实核桃光合特性及产量变化[J]. 果树学报, 2017, 34(7):851-860.
	WANG Bo, CHONG Peifang, LI Yi, et al. Studies on photosynthetic characters and their relationship with yield in two late season walnut cultivars[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2017, 34(7):851-860.
[18]	刘红明, 龙春瑞, 李进学, 等. 3个柠檬品种在云南干热河谷区的光合特性及结果性能分析[J]. 果树学报, 2017, 34(1):59-68.
	LIU Hongming, LONG Chunrui, LI Jinxue, et al. A study on photosynthetic characteristics and fruiting performance of three lemon varieties in dry-hot valley regions in Yunnan province[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2017, 34(1):59-68.
[19]	Nevine M T, Ghany K M. Some horticultural and pathological studies to reduce fruit decay of "Anna" apple and increase fruit set, yield and improve fruit quality and storability. Journal of American Science, 2016, 12(1):104-122
[20]	曹庆昌, 王乐乐, 兰彦平, 等. V字形树形对板栗光合特性及生长结果的影响试验初报[J]. 中国果树, 2017 (4):40-43.
	CAO Qingchang, WANG Lele, LAN Yanping, et al. Effects of V-shaped tree on photosynthetic characteristics and growth and fruiting ofCastanea mollissima[J]. China Fruits, 2017 (4):40-43.
[21]	潘明启, 张付春, 钟海霞, 等. 北方葡萄水平棚架“顺沟高厂”树形的高光效、省力化评价[J]. 果树学报, 2017, 34(9):1134-1143.
	PAN Mingqi, ZHANG Fuchun, ZHONG Haixia, et al. Evaluation of photosynthetic efficiency and labor cost in cultivation of grape with an “oblique single cordon along ditch” trellis type in northern China[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2017, 34(9):1134-1143.
[22]	赵海亮, 赵文东, 孙凌俊, 等. 不同架式巨峰葡萄光合特性与叶绿素荧光参数研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2015, 28(6):2691-2695.
	ZHAO Hailiang, ZHAO Wendong, SUN Lingjun, et al. Study on photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Kyoho grape in different trellis[J]. SouthwestChina Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 28(6):2691-2695.
[23]	赵雪辉, 黄丽萍, 张晓萍, 等. 3个不同桃品种光合特性的研究[J]. 天津农业科学, 2016, 22(7):15-19.
	ZHAO Xuehui, HUANG Liping, ZHANG Xiaoping, et al. Photosynthetic characteristics of 3 different species of peach trees[J]. Tianjin Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 22(7):15-19.
[24]	许大全. 光合作用效率[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2002.
	XU Daquan. Photosynthetic Efficiency[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Press, 2002.
[25]	张利刚, 曾凡江, 刘波, 等. 塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘3种果树幼苗光合及抗逆性研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2011, 31(10):2027-2034.
	ZHANG Ligang, ZENG Fanjiang, LIU Bo. Photosynthetic and physiological characteristics of three fruit trees in the southern fringe of Taklamakan desert[J]. Acta Bot. Boreal. -Occident. Sin., 2011, 31(10):2027-2034.
[26]	张梦丽, 岳春芳, 李艺珍. 成龄枣树光合特性与光响应曲线模型[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(2):274-282. DOI
	ZHANG Mengli, YUE Chunfang, LI Yizhen. Photosynthetic characteristics and light response curve model of mature Jujube in southern Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(2):274-282. DOI

品种 Cultivars	Pn-光响应曲线特征参数 Characteristic parameters of Pn-light response curve
品种 Cultivars	直线回归方程 Linear regression equationPFD≤200 (μmol/(m²·s))	暗呼吸速率 Dark respiration rate (μmol/(m²·s))	表观量子效率 Apparent quantum efficiency	光补偿点 Light compensation point (μmol/(m²·s))	光饱和点 Light saturation point (μmol/(m²·s))	最高光合速率 Maximum photosynthetic rate (μmol/(m²·s))
克瑞森 Crimson	у=0.035x-1.830	-2.332	0.035	51.992	1 151.9	12.566
新郁 Xinyu	у=0.040x-3.104	-3.013	0.040	77.399	1 219.7	13.841
火焰无核 Flame seedless	у=0.044x-2.274	-2.239	0.044	51.205	1 194.5	15.277
巨玫瑰 Jumeigui	у=0.037x-2.133	-2.448	0.037	58.273	1 582.2	14.623
蓝宝石 Sapphire	у=0.022x-1.681	-2.009	0.022	76.041	1 296.0	17.719

品种 Cultivars	Pn-光响应曲线特征参数 Characteristic parameters of Pn-light response curve
品种 Cultivars	直线回归方程 Linear regression equationPFD≤200 (μmol/(m²·s))	暗呼吸速率 Dark respiration rate (μmol/(m²·s))	表观量子效率 Apparent quantum efficiency	光补偿点 Light compensation point (μmol/(m²·s))	光饱和点 Light saturation point (μmol/(m²·s))	最高光合速率 Maximum photosynthetic rate (μmol/(m²·s))
克瑞森 Crimson	у=0.035x-1.830	-2.332	0.035	51.992	1 151.9	12.566
新郁 Xinyu	у=0.040x-3.104	-3.013	0.040	77.399	1 219.7	13.841
火焰无核 Flame seedless	у=0.044x-2.274	-2.239	0.044	51.205	1 194.5	15.277
巨玫瑰 Jumeigui	у=0.037x-2.133	-2.448	0.037	58.273	1 582.2	14.623
蓝宝石 Sapphire	у=0.022x-1.681	-2.009	0.022	76.041	1 296.0	17.719