Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2021, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (10): 1784-1790.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.10.003
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Germplasm Resources·Molecular Genetics·Cultivation Physiology·Physiology and Biochenistry·Agricultural Product Analysis and Detection • Previous Articles Next Articles
Lei ZHANG(), Xiaoqing XIE, Huaijun TANG, Baocheng SUN, Cheng LIU(
)
Received:
2020-08-10
Online:
2021-10-20
Published:
2021-10-26
Correspondence author:
Cheng LIU
Supported by:
通讯作者:
刘成
作者简介:
张磊(1992-),男,甘肃张掖人,助理研究员,硕士,研究方向为粮食作物抗逆,(E-mail) 125006221@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Lei ZHANG, Xiaoqing XIE, Huaijun TANG, Baocheng SUN, Cheng LIU. Maize Grain Configuration Characters: Relationship with Yield and Drought Resistance[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(10): 1784-1790.
张磊, 谢小清, 唐怀君, 孙宝成, 刘成. 玉米籽粒构型与产量和抗旱性的关系分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(10): 1784-1790.
生育期 Growth Stage | 水分处理 Water Treat (m3/667 m2) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 (100%) | T2 (80%) | T3 (60%) | T4 (40%) | T5 (20%) | T6 (0%) | |
播种期 Sowing | 45 | 45 | 45 | 45 | 45 | 45 |
拔节期 Jointing | 45 | 36 | 27 | 18 | 9 | 0 |
喇叭口 Trumpet | 45 | 36 | 27 | 18 | 9 | 0 |
抽雄开花期 Tasseling&Flowering | 45 | 36 | 27 | 18 | 9 | 0 |
灌浆初期 Early Grouting | 45 | 36 | 27 | 18 | 9 | 0 |
灌浆中期 Middle Grouting | 45 | 36 | 27 | 18 | 9 | 0 |
灌浆后期 Later Grouting | 45 | 36 | 27 | 18 | 9 | 0 |
灌浆末期 Later Grouting | 45 | 36 | 27 | 18 | 9 | 0 |
总灌水量 Total Irrigated | 360 | 297 | 234 | 171 | 108 | 45 |
降雨量Rainfall | 44 | 44 | 44 | 44 | 44 | 44 |
总供水量 Total Amount | 404 | 341 | 278 | 215 | 152 | 89 |
Table 1 Irrigation scheme and total water amount
生育期 Growth Stage | 水分处理 Water Treat (m3/667 m2) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 (100%) | T2 (80%) | T3 (60%) | T4 (40%) | T5 (20%) | T6 (0%) | |
播种期 Sowing | 45 | 45 | 45 | 45 | 45 | 45 |
拔节期 Jointing | 45 | 36 | 27 | 18 | 9 | 0 |
喇叭口 Trumpet | 45 | 36 | 27 | 18 | 9 | 0 |
抽雄开花期 Tasseling&Flowering | 45 | 36 | 27 | 18 | 9 | 0 |
灌浆初期 Early Grouting | 45 | 36 | 27 | 18 | 9 | 0 |
灌浆中期 Middle Grouting | 45 | 36 | 27 | 18 | 9 | 0 |
灌浆后期 Later Grouting | 45 | 36 | 27 | 18 | 9 | 0 |
灌浆末期 Later Grouting | 45 | 36 | 27 | 18 | 9 | 0 |
总灌水量 Total Irrigated | 360 | 297 | 234 | 171 | 108 | 45 |
降雨量Rainfall | 44 | 44 | 44 | 44 | 44 | 44 |
总供水量 Total Amount | 404 | 341 | 278 | 215 | 152 | 89 |
项目 Item | 方差来源 Variance Source | DF | SS | MS | F-Value | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单株粒重 Plant Gain Weight (g) | 品种 | 9 | 27 236 | 3 026.2 | 4.4** | 0.000 5 |
灌水 | 1 | 419 499.3 | 419 499.3 | 603** | 0.000 0 | |
品种×灌水 | 9 | 45 137 | 5 015.2 | 7.2** | 0.000 0 | |
机误 | 40 | 27 825.7 | 695.6 | |||
百粒重 Hundred Grain Wight (g) | 品种 | 9 | 817.8 | 90.9 | 13.1** | 0.000 0 |
灌水 | 1 | 1 497 | 1 497 | 215.2** | 0.000 0 | |
品种×灌水 | 9 | 186.5 | 20.7 | 3** | 0.008 3 | |
机误 | 40 | 278.3 | 7 | |||
粒长 Grain Length (mm) | 品种 | 9 | 26.7 | 3 | 5.5** | 0.000 1 |
灌水 | 1 | 75.3 | 75.3 | 138.9** | 0.000 0 | |
品种×灌水 | 9 | 6.9 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 0.214 8 | |
机误 | 40 | 21.7 | 0.5 | |||
粒宽 Grain Width (mm) | 品种 | 9 | 12.9 | 1.4 | 6** | 0.000 0 |
灌水 | 1 | 17.6 | 17.6 | 74.2** | 0.000 0 | |
品种×灌水 | 9 | 3.2 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 0.187 8 | |
机误 | 40 | 9.5 | 0.2 | |||
粒厚 Grain Thickness (mm) | 品种 | 9 | 10.8 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 0.088 4 |
灌水 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 6.1* | 0.018 | |
品种×灌水 | 9 | 9.2 | 1 | 1.6 | 0.156 3 | |
机误 | 40 | 26 | 0.6 | |||
圆形性 Circularity | 品种 | 9 | 0.053 7 | 0.006 0 | 6.1** | 0.000 0 |
灌水 | 1 | 0.048 7 | 0.048 7 | 49.6** | 0.000 0 | |
品种×灌水 | 9 | 0.010 3 | 0.001 1 | 1.2 | 0.344 9 | |
机误 | 40 | 0.039 3 | 0.001 0 | |||
矩形性 Rectangularity | 品种 | 9 | 0.001 0 | 0.000 1 | 9.9** | 0.000 0 |
灌水 | 1 | 0.001 3 | 0.001 3 | 112** | 0.000 0 | |
品种×灌水 | 9 | 0.000 5 | 0.000 1 | 4.4** | 0.000 5 | |
机误 | 40 | 0.000 5 | 0.000 0 | |||
粒色R Grain Color-R | 品种 | 9 | 1 420.8 | 157.9 | 3.7** | 0.002 |
灌水 | 1 | 1 188.2 | 1 188.2 | 27.7** | 0.000 0 | |
品种×灌水 | 9 | 597 | 66.3 | 1.5 | 0.165 6 | |
机误 | 40 | 1 716.7 | 42.9 | |||
粒色G Grain Color-G | 品种 | 9 | 1 503.3 | 167 | 3.5** | 0.002 8 |
灌水 | 1 | 540 | 540 | 11.4** | 0.001 7 | |
品种×灌水 | 9 | 670.7 | 74.5 | 1.6 | 0.158 8 | |
机误 | 40 | 1 902.7 | 47.6 | |||
粒色B Grain Color-B | 品种 | 9 | 1 077.6 | 119.7 | 1.3 | 0.262 7 |
灌水 | 1 | 187.3 | 187.3 | 2 | 0.160 2 | |
品种×灌水 | 9 | 705.7 | 78.4 | 0.9 | 0.569 6 | |
机误 | 40 | 3 658 | 91.5 |
Table 2 ANOVA table of effects of irrigation ratio on 10 maize grain related traits
项目 Item | 方差来源 Variance Source | DF | SS | MS | F-Value | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单株粒重 Plant Gain Weight (g) | 品种 | 9 | 27 236 | 3 026.2 | 4.4** | 0.000 5 |
灌水 | 1 | 419 499.3 | 419 499.3 | 603** | 0.000 0 | |
品种×灌水 | 9 | 45 137 | 5 015.2 | 7.2** | 0.000 0 | |
机误 | 40 | 27 825.7 | 695.6 | |||
百粒重 Hundred Grain Wight (g) | 品种 | 9 | 817.8 | 90.9 | 13.1** | 0.000 0 |
灌水 | 1 | 1 497 | 1 497 | 215.2** | 0.000 0 | |
品种×灌水 | 9 | 186.5 | 20.7 | 3** | 0.008 3 | |
机误 | 40 | 278.3 | 7 | |||
粒长 Grain Length (mm) | 品种 | 9 | 26.7 | 3 | 5.5** | 0.000 1 |
灌水 | 1 | 75.3 | 75.3 | 138.9** | 0.000 0 | |
品种×灌水 | 9 | 6.9 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 0.214 8 | |
机误 | 40 | 21.7 | 0.5 | |||
粒宽 Grain Width (mm) | 品种 | 9 | 12.9 | 1.4 | 6** | 0.000 0 |
灌水 | 1 | 17.6 | 17.6 | 74.2** | 0.000 0 | |
品种×灌水 | 9 | 3.2 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 0.187 8 | |
机误 | 40 | 9.5 | 0.2 | |||
粒厚 Grain Thickness (mm) | 品种 | 9 | 10.8 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 0.088 4 |
灌水 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 6.1* | 0.018 | |
品种×灌水 | 9 | 9.2 | 1 | 1.6 | 0.156 3 | |
机误 | 40 | 26 | 0.6 | |||
圆形性 Circularity | 品种 | 9 | 0.053 7 | 0.006 0 | 6.1** | 0.000 0 |
灌水 | 1 | 0.048 7 | 0.048 7 | 49.6** | 0.000 0 | |
品种×灌水 | 9 | 0.010 3 | 0.001 1 | 1.2 | 0.344 9 | |
机误 | 40 | 0.039 3 | 0.001 0 | |||
矩形性 Rectangularity | 品种 | 9 | 0.001 0 | 0.000 1 | 9.9** | 0.000 0 |
灌水 | 1 | 0.001 3 | 0.001 3 | 112** | 0.000 0 | |
品种×灌水 | 9 | 0.000 5 | 0.000 1 | 4.4** | 0.000 5 | |
机误 | 40 | 0.000 5 | 0.000 0 | |||
粒色R Grain Color-R | 品种 | 9 | 1 420.8 | 157.9 | 3.7** | 0.002 |
灌水 | 1 | 1 188.2 | 1 188.2 | 27.7** | 0.000 0 | |
品种×灌水 | 9 | 597 | 66.3 | 1.5 | 0.165 6 | |
机误 | 40 | 1 716.7 | 42.9 | |||
粒色G Grain Color-G | 品种 | 9 | 1 503.3 | 167 | 3.5** | 0.002 8 |
灌水 | 1 | 540 | 540 | 11.4** | 0.001 7 | |
品种×灌水 | 9 | 670.7 | 74.5 | 1.6 | 0.158 8 | |
机误 | 40 | 1 902.7 | 47.6 | |||
粒色B Grain Color-B | 品种 | 9 | 1 077.6 | 119.7 | 1.3 | 0.262 7 |
灌水 | 1 | 187.3 | 187.3 | 2 | 0.160 2 | |
品种×灌水 | 9 | 705.7 | 78.4 | 0.9 | 0.569 6 | |
机误 | 40 | 3 658 | 91.5 |
[1] | 张凤路, 孙国伟, 郭江, 等. 常用玉米杂交种的耐旱性研究[J]. 玉米科学, 2004, 12(1):16-17. |
ZHANG Fenglu, SUN Guowei, GUO Jiang, et al. Study on drought tolerance of commonly used maize hybrids[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2004, 12(1):16-17. | |
[2] | 李亮, 郝转芳, 翁建峰, 等. 玉米自交系萌发期与苗期的耐旱性评价[J]. 玉米科学, 2011, 19(4):5-9. |
LI Liang, HAO Zhuanfang, WENG Jianfeng, et al. Evaluation of Maize Drought Tolerance atGermination and Seedling Stages[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2011, 19(4):5-9. | |
[3] | 郝转芳, 苏治军, 李亮, 等. 基于SNP标记的关联分析在玉米耐旱研究中的应用[J]. 作物杂志, 2009,(6):1-7 |
HAO Zhuanfang, SU Zhijun, LI Liang, et al. Application of CORRELATION analysis based on SNP markers in maize drought tolerance research[J]. Crops, 2009,(6):1-7. | |
[4] | 王利润. 我国玉米生产现状及发展趋势[J]. 山西农经, 2015,(3):8-9. |
WANG Lirun. Status quo and Development Trend of Corn production in China[J]. Shanxi Agricultural Economics, 2015,(3):8-9. | |
[5] | 彭勃, 王阳, 李永祥, 等. 玉米籽粒产量与产量构成因子的关系及条件QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 3(10):1624-1633. |
PENG Bo, WANG Yang, LI Yongxiang, et al. Relationship between grain yield and yield components of maize and QTL analysis[J]. Crops, 2010, 3(10):1624-1633. | |
[6] | Austin D F. Comparative mapping in F2:3 and F6:7 generations of quantitative trait loci for grain yield and yield components in maize[J]. Theoretical & Applied Genetics, 1996, 92:817-826. |
[7] | 朱春杰. 玉米籽粒性状与产量的相关性分析[J]. 种子世界, 2016,(6):16. |
ZHU Chunjie. Correlation analysis of corn grain character and yield[J]. Seed World, 2016,(6):16. | |
[8] | 李波, 许晶, 刘虹, 等. 玉米主要农艺性状与产量相关分析[J]. 种子科技, 2014,(12):35-37. |
LI Bo, XU Jing, LIU Hong, et al. Correlation analysis of main agronomic traits and yield of maize[J]. Seed Scicence& Technology, 2014, (12):35-37. | |
[9] | 王国宏, 董润楠, 孙成韬, 等. 玉米百粒重与主要籽粒性状的相关分析[J]. 园艺与种苗, 2015,(12):48-50. |
WANG Guohong, DONG Runnan, SUN Chengtao, et al. Correlation analysis of 100-grain weight and main grain characters in maize[J]. Horticulture and Seedling, 2015,(12):48-50. | |
[10] | 郑有良, 赖仲铭, 杨克诚. 玉米籽粒生长特性与籽粒大小的关系及其遗传研究[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 1985,(2):73-79. |
ZHENG Youliang, LAI Zhongming, YANG Kecheng. Studies on the relationship between grain growth characteristics and grain size and its inheritance in maize[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 1985,(2):73-79. | |
[11] | 李永祥, 王阳, 石云素, 等. 玉米籽粒构型与产量性状的关系及QTL作图[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(2):408-418. |
LI Yongxiang, WANG Yang, SHI Yunsu, et al. Relationship between grain configuration and yield characters of maize and QTL mapping[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(2):408-418. | |
[12] | 张向歌, 王彬, 袁亮, 等. 基于单片段代换系玉米子粒性状的QTL定位[J]. 玉米科学, 2013,(6):35-40. |
ZHANG Xiangge, WANG Bin, YUAN Liang, et al. QTL mapping based on single - segment substitution line maize seed traits[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2013,(6):35-40. |
[1] | ZENG Wanying, GENG Hongwei, CHENG Yukun, LI Sizhong, QIAN Songting, GAO Weishi, ZHANG Liming. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance during the rapid growth stage of sugar beet cultivars [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2140-2151. |
[2] | LI Jinyao, XU Guiqing, WANG Lisheng, LU Ping, SHI Dongfang, ZHENG Weihua. Study on the effect of N fertilization on drought resistance of Calligonum caput-medusae seedlings [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2330-2340. |
[3] | WANG Yizhao, YANG Qizhi, LIU Yuxiu, Alayi Nurkamali, Vladimir Shvidchenko, ZHANG Zhengmao. Evaluation of drought resistance of different Kazakhstan spring wheat at seeding stage under PEG-6000 stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1352-1360. |
[4] | TANG Xixi, Mubarek Ayup, XU Panyun, YU Qiuhong, GUO Chunmiao, ZHANG Ping, GONG Peng. Response of root anatomical structure of different rootstock resources of almond to drought stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 897-907. |
[5] | JIA Yonghong, WEI Haipeng, HOU Dianliang, ZENG Chaowu, Nasirula Keremu, LIANG Xiaodong. Evaluation of correlation between drought resistance and agronomic traits of self-breeding spring wheat varieties in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(12): 2940-2948. |
[6] | SHAN Ying, LI Yue, XU Min, LIU Yanzhen, LI Ran, CHEN Jieyin, WANG Zisheng, ZHU He. Drought resistance evaluation of liaomian cotton varieties at germination stage under PEG simulated drought stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2653-2660. |
[7] | TANG Huaijun, XIE Xiaoqing, ZHANG Lei, SUN Baocheng, YANG Jie, LIU Cheng. Drought resistance identification and screening of 283 maize [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2687-2693. |
[8] | SUN Fenglei, REN Jiaojiao, LEI Bin, GAO Wenwei, QU Yanying. QTL mapping and genomic selection of maize leaf width [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(10): 2341-2351. |
[9] | XIE Xiaoqing, TANG Huaijun, ZHANG Lei, SUN Baocheng, LIU Cheng. Changes of maize ear traits and drought resistance with irrigation amount [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(10): 2412-2418. |
[10] | NIE Shihui, WANG Xian, PENG Lin, JI Liang. Preliminary Construction of Chickpea Drought Resistance Core Germplasm Based on Agronomic Traits [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(4): 847-854. |
[11] | YANG Long, ZHAO Fuxiang, DUAN Yajie, CAI Yongsheng, ZHENG Kai, CHEN Qin, CHEN Quanjia, QU Yanying. Evaluation on Drought Resistance of Recombinant Inbred Lines of Gossypium barbadense L. at Flowering and Boll Stages [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(12): 2861-2869. |
[12] | ZOU Chenglin, TAN Hua, HUANG Kaijian, HUANG Aihua, ZHAI Ruining, MO Runxiu. Drought Resistance Identification of 28 Maize Lines [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(10): 2411-2420. |
[13] | XIE Xiaoqing, TANG Huaijun, ZHANG Lei, SUN Baocheng, LIU Cheng. Study on the Theoretical Model of Watering Ratio and Drought Resistance under Proportional Irrigation of Maize [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(1): 70-78. |
[14] | MIAO Haocui, LI Qiang, HOU Xianfei, JIA Donghai, SHI Bixian, DING Hong, LI Limin, ZHANG Zhimeng. Effects of Drought at Different Growth Stages on Growth and Yield of Peanut [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(3): 441-449. |
[15] | ZHAO Long, LIU Xiangyu, XU Jiang, ZHU Li, LI Yabin, Mamat Ahmat, LI Qun, Alimu Abudilimu. Performance and Drought Resisting Group Classification of 43 Maize Varieties in the Arid Area of Turpan, Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(12): 2182-2190. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 68
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 106
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||